Skip to main content
JAMA Network logoLink to JAMA Network
. 2018 May 15;319(19):2009–2020. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.5690

Trends in Prescription Medication Use Among Children and Adolescents—United States, 1999-2014

Craig M Hales 1,, Brian K Kit 1,2, Qiuping Gu 1, Cynthia L Ogden 1
PMCID: PMC6583241  PMID: 29800213

Key Points

Question

What are the trends in use of the most common therapeutic classes of prescription medications among US children and adolescents from 1999 to 2014?

Findings

In this serial cross-sectional study that included 38 277 participants, the overall use of prescription medications in the last 30 days decreased from 24.6% in 1999-2002 to 21.9% in 2011-2014; however, the prevalence of use of asthma medications, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder medications, proton pump inhibitors, and contraceptives increased among certain age groups. Use of antibiotics, antihistamines, and upper respiratory combination medications decreased.

Meaning

Between 1999 and 2014 there were divergent patterns in the use of prescription medications among US children and adolescents.

Abstract

Importance

Access to appropriate prescription medications, use of inappropriate or ineffective treatments, and adverse drug events are public health concerns among US children and adolescents.

Objective

To evaluate trends in use of prescription medications among US children and adolescents.

Design, Setting, and Participants

US children and adolescents aged 0 to 19 years in the 1999-2014 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES)—serial cross-sectional, nationally representative surveys of the civilian noninstitutionalized population.

Exposures

Sex, age, race and Hispanic origin, household income and education, insurance status, current health status.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Use of any prescription medications or 2 or more prescription medications taken in the past 30 days; use of medications by therapeutic class; trends in medication use across 4-year periods from 1999-2002 to 2011-2014. Data were collected though in-home interview and direct observation of the prescription container.

Results

Data on prescription medication use were available for 38 277 children and adolescents (mean age, 10 years; 49% girls). Overall, use of any prescription medication in the past 30 days decreased from 24.6% (95% CI, 22.6% to 26.6%) in 1999-2002 to 21.9% (95% CI, 20.3% to 23.6%) in 2011-2014 (β = −0.41 percentage points every 2 years [95% CI, −0.79 to −0.03]; P = .04), but there was no linear trend in the use of 2 or more prescription medications (8.5% [95% CI, 7.6% to 9.4%] in 2011-2014). In 2011-2014, the most commonly used medication classes were asthma medications (6.1% [95% CI, 5.4% to 6.8%]), antibiotics (4.5% [95% CI, 3.7% to 5.5%]), attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) medications (3.5% [95% CI, 2.9% to 4.2%]), topical agents (eg, dermatologic agents, nasal steroids) (3.5% [95% CI, 3.0% to 4.1%]), and antihistamines (2.0% [95% CI, 1.7% to 2.5%]). There were significant linear trends in 14 of 39 therapeutic classes or subclasses, or in individual medications, with 8 showing increases, including asthma and ADHD medications and contraceptives, and 6 showing decreases, including antibiotics, antihistamines, and upper respiratory combination medications.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this study of US children and adolescents based on a nationally representative survey, estimates of prescription medication use showed an overall decrease in use of any medication from 1999-2014. The prevalence of asthma medication, ADHD medication, and contraceptive use increased among certain age groups, whereas use of antibiotics, antihistamines, and upper respiratory combination medications decreased.


This pharmacoepidemiology study uses 1999-2014 NHANES data to characterize trends in use of prescription medications among children and adolescents aged 0 to 19 years in the United States.

Introduction

Monitoring trends in use of prescription medications among children and adolescents provides insights on several important public health concerns, such as shifting disease burden, changes in access to health care and medicines, increases in the adoption of appropriate therapies, and decreases in use of inappropriate or ineffective treatments. Adverse drug events, particularly involving antibiotics, psychotropics, opioids, and cold and cough medications, are also a concern.1,2,3,4,5 Since the 2009 publication of population-based, age-specific prescription medication trends among US children,6 patterns of use may have changed because of adoption of new clinical practice guidelines, growing concerns about childhood obesity–related health conditions such as diabetes and hypertension, and increased awareness of antibiotic resistance.

This study provides nationally representative estimates and trends in prescription medication use overall and by common therapeutic classes among US children and adolescents from 1999 to 2014.

Methods

The National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) is a nationally representative cross-sectional survey designed to monitor the health and nutritional status of the civilian, noninstitutionalized US population and has been conducted continuously in 2-year cycles since 1999.7 Data from the 2013-2014 cycle are the most recent prescription medication data available. The interview response rate for children and adolescents through age 19 years was 89.2% in 1999-2002 and 80.1% in 2011-2014.8 NHANES participants 18 years or older provided written consent, whereas parental permission was obtained for those younger than 18 years; children and adolescents aged 7 to 17 years also provided documented assent. NHANES was approved by the National Center for Health Statistics research ethics review board.

Home face-to-face interviews were conducted throughout each year. Participants 16 years or older answered questions about prescription medication use themselves; for participants younger than 16 years and those not able to answer questions themselves, a proxy respondent (usually a parent) provided this information. During the interview, survey participants were asked if they had taken any prescription medication in the past 30 days. If “yes,” the interviewer recorded the names of up to 20 prescription medications taken in the last 30 days directly from the medication container (eg, bottle, vial, inhaler, blister pack, paperboard box). If the container was not available, the interviewer recorded the medication name as reported by the participant. In 2013-2014, the interviewer could record the medication name using the participant’s prescription documentation printed at the pharmacy (“printout”) if the medication container was not available. The medication name was matched to the brand or generic name in the Multum Lexicon Plus drug database and converted to the standard drug name.9 Any medications reported that were available only as an over-the-counter product during the 2-year survey cycle were excluded.

The prevalence of use of any prescription medication and 2 or more prescription medications were evaluated for 2011-2012 and 2013-2014 combined, by age group (0-23 months, 2-5 years, 6-11 years, and 12-19 years), sex, race and Hispanic origin, household income to poverty ratio, education level of the household head, insurance status, and current health status, because previous studies have shown different patterns of prescription medication use by these characteristics.6,10,11

Information on race and Hispanic origin were self-reported and categorized as non-Hispanic white, non-Hispanic black, Mexican American, Hispanic (including Mexican American and other Hispanic participants), non-Hispanic Asian, or other (including multiple races). Participants categorized as “other” were included in analyses but were not reported separately. Income to poverty ratio is the ratio of household income to poverty level accounting for inflation and household size and was categorized as less than 1, 1 to less than 2, 2 to less than 3, 3 to less than 4, and 4 or greater (eg, 2 indicates an income 2 times the poverty level). Education level of the household head characterized the socioeconomic status of the household and was categorized as less than a high school degree, high school degree, some college, or college degree or higher. Self-reported insurance status was categorized as insured (including public and private sources) or uninsured.12 Current health status was self-reported12 and categorized as “excellent or very good,” “good,” or “fair or poor.”

Linear trends in use of any prescription medication and 2 or more prescription medications were evaluated from 1999 to 2014 by sex, age group, and race and Hispanic origin. For the trend analysis, race and Hispanic origin was categorized as non-Hispanic white, non-Hispanic black, and Mexican American because surveys from 1999-2006 oversampled Mexican Americans, but not all Hispanics, and non-Hispanic Asians were not oversampled until 2011.

Medications were categorized into therapeutic classes using the Multum Lexicon Plus drug database,13 which provided nested levels of classification. The following additional therapeutic classes were created (eTable in the Supplement): antibiotics (oral only), asthma medications,14 attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) medications,15 antihypertensive agents, and narcotic-containing analgesics. These classes were added because of their particular relevance to child and adolescent heath, public health priorities, and/or clinical practice guidelines16,17,18,19,20,21 and were created by either separating certain medications from a broader class (eg, antibiotics were in the same therapeutic class as all other anti-infective agents) or by grouping together medications from different therapeutic classes. Because many medical conditions affect youth at specific ages, use of prescription medication by age group was examined. Individual prescription medications or therapeutic subclasses selected for presentation were reported by at least 10 children or adolescents during at least 2 of the 4-year periods for the age group presented. Prevalence of contraceptive use was estimated in girls only.

Statistical Analysis

Data were aggregated over 4-year periods to provide adequate sample size for estimating small proportions. All analyses used NHANES interview sample weights that adjust for nonresponse, noncoverage, and unequal probabilities of selection; all estimates and 95% CIs were weighted to be nationally representative. Standard errors of prevalences were estimated using Taylor series linearization, and 95% CIs were constructed using the method of Korn and Graubard.22 Trend tests for prevalence of prescription medication use in 2011-2014 across categories of age, education level of the household head, household income, and current health status were performed using linear regression by including these as continuous variables. Differences in prevalence by sex, race and Hispanic origin, and insurance status were evaluated using Pearson χ2 test. Pairwise differences in prevalence by race and Hispanic origin were evaluated using a 2-sided t test. Linear time trends in prevalence were calculated using linear regression models, in which the 2-year NHANES cycle was modeled as a continuous variable. The linear regression estimate for the 2-year cycle (β) can be interpreted as the average percentage point change every 2 years; the 95% CI and P value for this estimate were also calculated. Stated increasing or decreasing linear trends were significant at P < .05 (2-sided).

Trends for a large number of therapeutic classes and individual and prescription medications are presented. No adjustments were made for multiple comparisons, but the magnitude of the trend (β) and 95% CI are presented in addition to the P value to help guide interpretation. Patterns of prescription medication use should be considered in the context of use of related therapeutic classes and among different age groups.

R version 3.4.123 was used for data management, and analyses were performed using the R “survey” package24 to account for the complex sample design.

Results

The sample comprised 38 277 children and adolescents aged 0 to 19 years (mean age, 10 years; 49% girls) over the period 1999-2014, which excluded 21 youths because of missing data on prescription medication use. There were 10 706 study participants in 1999-2002 and 8600 in 2011-2014.

In 2011-2014, 21.9% (95% CI, 20.3% to 23.6%) of children and adolescents took any prescription medication within 30 days before the interview, and 8.5% (95% CI, 7.6% to 9.4%) took 2 or more prescription medications (Table 1). The prevalence of use of both any and 2 or more prescription medications increased with age, from 17.4% (95% CI, 14.9% to 20.1%) and 4.7% (95% CI, 3.6% to 6.0%), respectively, in children aged 0 to 23 months to 25.9% (95% CI, 22.6% to 29.4%) and 10.9% (95% CI, 9.1% to 12.8%), respectively, in adolescents aged 12 to 19 years (Table 1).

Table 1. Prevalence of Prescription Medication Use in Prior 30 Days Among Children and Adolescents Aged 0 to 19 Years: United States, 2011-2014a.

Characteristic No. of Participants Any Prescription Medication ≥2 Prescription Medications
Unweighted No. Prevalence, % (95% CI) P Value Unweighted No. Prevalence, % (95% CI) P Value
Overall 8600 1651 21.9 (20.3-23.6) 638 8.5 (7.6-9.4)
Age
0-23 mo 1288 229 17.4 (14.9-20.1) <.001b 62 4.7 (3.6-6.0) <.001b
2-5 y 1910 309 16.5 (13.7-19.7) 96 4.9 (3.4-6.8)
6-11 y 2698 532 21.5 (19.2-24.0) 238 8.6 (7.3-10.2)
12-19 y 2704 581 25.9 (22.6-29.4) 242 10.9 (9.1-12.8)
Sex
Boys 4360 859 20.6 (18.5-22.9) .12c 361 8.7 (7.5-10.1) .52c
Girls 4240 792 23.3 (20.7-25.9) 277 8.1 (6.9-9.5)
Race and Hispanic origind
Non-Hispanic white 2133 505 25.3 (22.6-28.2) <.001c 189 9.5 (8.1-11.0) .002c
Non-Hispanic black 2318 474 21.1 (18.6-23.7)e 202 9.2 (7.6-11.0)
Hispanicf 2727 447 16.8 (14.3-19.4)e,g 169 6.5 (5.2-8.1)e
Mexican American 1778 266 15.9 (12.9-19.2) 104 6.6 (4.9-8.5)
Non-Hispanic Asian 895 114 13.2 (10.5-16.2)e,g 39 4.7 (3.2-6.7)e,g
Family income to poverty ratioh,i
<1 2859 538 19.9 (17.4-22.5) .36b 216 8.0 (6.7-9.4) .93b
1 to <2 2042 411 24.0 (20.2-28.1) 169 10.1 (7.6-13.0)
2 to <3 961 201 23.4 (19.7-27.4) 76 8.5 (6.1-11.4)
3 to <4 686 144 22.9 (18.2-28.1) 56 8.3 (5.3-12.1)
≥4 1273 241 22.5 (18.7-26.6) 84 8.8 (7.0-10.9)
Educationi,j
<High school 2097 341 18.2 (15.5-21.0) .11b 128 6.9 (5.6-8.6) .26b
High school 1903 390 22.7 (19.5-26.0) 145 8.3 (6.3-10.7)
Some college 2449 501 23.6 (20.2-27.2) 204 9.1 (7.5-11.0)
College degree or higher 1853 357 22.0 (18.5-25.9) 133 8.3 (6.4-10.4)
Insurance statusi
Insured 7844 1592 23.1 (21.3-24.9) <.001c 618 9.0 (8.1-10.0) <.001c
Uninsured 739 58 9.7 (5.9-14.8) 20 2.4 (1.4-3.8)
Current health status
Excellent or very good 5992 960 18.4 (17.0-19.9) <.001b 303 5.8 (5.0-6.6) <.001b
Good 2108 497 28.7 (24.5-33.3) 224 13.8 (11.2-16.7)
Fair or poor 500 194 42.7 (34.4-51.3) 111 23.5 (18.3-29.5)
a

Source: National Center for Health Statistics, National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2011-2014. Prevalence estimates are weighted to account for differential probabilities of selection and survey nonresponse.

b

P value for trend using linear regression.

c

P value calculated using Pearson χ2 test with Rao-Scott second-order correction.

d

Categories “other Hispanic” and “other” not shown; χ2 and t tests compared mutually exclusive categories: non-Hispanic white, non-Hispanic black, Hispanic, and non-Hispanic Asian.

e

Significantly different from non-Hispanic white youth (P < .05).

f

Includes Mexican American.

g

Significantly different from non-Hispanic black youth (P < .05).

h

Ratio of family income to poverty level specific to the survey year (eg, 2 indicates a household income of 2 times the poverty level).

i

Fewer than 8600 participants because of missing data.

j

Education level of head of household.

Use of any prescription medication was lower among non-Hispanic black (21.1% [95% CI, 18.6% to 23.7%]), Hispanic (16.8% [95% CI, 14.3% to 19.4%]), and non-Hispanic Asian (13.2% [95% CI, 10.5% to 16.2%]) youth compared with non-Hispanic white youth (25.3% [95% CI, 22.6% to 28.2%]) and also was lower among Hispanic and non-Hispanic Asian youth compared with non-Hispanic black youth. Use of 2 or more prescription medications was lower among Hispanic (6.5% [95% CI, 5.2% to 8.1%]) and non-Hispanic Asian (4.7% [95% CI, 3.2% to 6.7%]) youth compared with non-Hispanic white youth (9.5% [95% CI, 8.1% to 11.0%]) and also was lower among non-Hispanic Asian youth compared with non-Hispanic black youth (9.2% [95% CI, 7.6% to 11.0%]).

Insured youth had a higher prevalence of use of any prescription medication (23.1% [95% CI, 21.3% to 24.9%]) and 2 or more prescription medications (9.0% [95% CI, 8.1% to 10.0%]) compared with uninsured youth (9.7% [95% CI, 5.9% to 14.8%] and 2.4% [95% CI, 1.4% to 3.8%], respectively). Prevalence of use of both any prescription medication and 2 or more prescription medications increased with poorer health status, from 18.4% (95% CI, 17.0% to 19.9%) and 5.8% (95% CI, 5.0% to 6.6%), respectively, among youth reporting excellent or very good health to 42.7% (95% CI, 34.4% to 51.3%) and 23.5% (95% CI, 18.3% to 29.5%), respectively, among youth reporting fair or poor health. The prevalence of prescription medication use did not differ by sex, and there were no significant trends by household income or education of the household head.

Overall, use of any prescription medication decreased from 24.6% in 1999-2002 to 21.9% in 2011-2014 (β = −0.41 percentage points every 2 years [95% CI, −0.79 to −0.03]; P = .04), but there was no significant linear trend in the use of 2 or more prescription medications (Table 2). Among children aged 0 to 23 months, use of any prescription medication decreased from 25.5% in 1999-2002 to 17.4% in 2011-2014 (β = −1.14 percentage points every 2 years [95% CI, −1.79 to −0.49]; P < .001) and use of 2 or more prescription medications decreased from 8.3% to 4.7% (β = −0.58 percentage points every 2 years [95% CI, −0.88 to −0.27; P < .001), but there was no significant linear trend for the other age groups. Use of any prescription medication decreased among boys, from 25.7% to 20.6% (β = −0.69 percentage points every 2 years [95% CI, −1.18 to −0.21]; P = .006), and use of 2 or more prescription medication decreased among girls, from 9.3% to 8.1% (β = −0.30 percentage points every 2 years [95% CI, −0.57 to −0.04]; P = .03). Among non-Hispanic black youth, use of any prescription medication increased from 18.1% in 1999-2002 to 21.1% in 2011-2014 (β = 0.52 percentage points every 2 years [95% CI, 0.06 to 0.98]; P = .03) and use of 2 or more prescription medications increased from 6.4% to 9.2% (β = 0.44 percentage points every 2 years [95% CI, 0.12 to 0.76]; P = .009) but showed no significant linear trend for other race and Hispanic origin groups.

Table 2. Trends in Prevalence of Use of Any Prescription Medication and 2 or More Prescription Medications in Prior 30 Days, by Sex, Age Group, and Race or Hispanic Origin: Children and Adolescents Aged 0 to 19 Years, United States, 1999-2014a.

1999-2002
(n = 10 706)
2003-2006
(n = 10 441)
2007-2010
(n = 8530)
2011-2014
(n = 8600)
β (95% CI)b P Value for Trendb
Unweighted No. Prevalence, % (95% CI) Unweighted No. Prevalence, % (95% CI) Unweighted No. Prevalence, % (95% CI) Unweighted No. Prevalence, % (95% CI)
Use of Any Prescription Medication
Overall 2203 24.6 (22.6 to 26.6) 2188 24.8 (22.8 to 26.9) 1836 24.6 (23.0 to 26.3) 1651 21.9 (20.3 to 23.6) −0.41 (−0.79 to −0.03) .04
Age
0-23 mo 406 25.5 (21.8 to 29.6) 370 24.0 (20.7 to 27.5) 338 24.1 (20.6 to 27.8) 229 17.4 (14.9 to 20.1) −1.14 (−1.79 to −0.49) <.001
2-5 y 332 19.5 (16.3 to 23.1) 373 21.1 (17.1 to 25.7) 377 20.0 (17.7 to 22.4) 309 16.5 (13.7 to 19.7) −0.52 (−1.17 to 0.14) .12
6-11 y 433 22.0 (18.5 to 25.9) 427 23.0 (19.5 to 26.8) 548 24.3 (21.2 to 27.7) 532 21.5 (19.2 to 24.0) 0.09 (−0.64 to 0.82) .81
12-19 y 1032 28.8 (26.5 to 31.1) 1018 28.0 (25.3 to 30.9) 573 27.3 (24.2 to 30.6) 581 25.9 (22.6 to 29.4) −0.58 (−1.16 to 0.00) .05
Sex
Boys 1143 25.7 (23.1 to 28.4) 1078 24.5 (21.8 to 27.5) 965 23.8 (21.9 to 25.8) 859 20.6 (18.5 to 22.9) −0.69 (−1.18 to −0.21) .006
Girls 1060 23.4 (21.5 to 25.5) 1110 25.1 (23.2 to 27.0) 871 25.5 (22.6 to 28.5) 792 23.3 (20.7 to 25.9) −0.12 (−0.60 to 0.36) .63
Race and Hispanic originc
Non-Hispanic white 831 28.3 (25.4 to 31.4) 812 28.6 (25.8 to 31.5) 759 29.1 (26.8 to 31.5) 505 25.3 (22.6 to 28.2) −0.41 (−1.02 to 0.21) .20
Non-Hispanic black 537 18.1 (16.2 to 20.1) 621 19.4 (17.1 to 21.8) 385 21.1 (19.0 to 23.4) 474 21.1 (18.6 to 23.7) 0.52 (0.06 to 0.98) .03
Mexican American 586 15.6 (14.1 to 17.1) 550 16.5 (14.7 to 18.4) 395 16.6 (14.1 to 19.3) 266 15.9 (12.9 to 19.2) −0.07 (−0.59 to 0.45) .79
Use of ≥2 Prescription Medications
Overall 796 9.3 (7.9 to 10.9) 847 9.9 (8.9 to 10.9) 700 9.3 (8.3 to 10.5) 638 8.5 (7.6 to 9.4) −0.17 (−0.40 to 0.06) .15
Age
0-23 mo 132 8.3 (6.5 to 10.3) 128 8.3 (6.6 to 10.3) 101 6.5 (4.5 to 9.0) 62 4.7 (3.6 to 6.0) −0.58 (−0.88 to −0.27) <.001
2-5 y 110 7.0 (5.2 to 9.3) 139 7.1 (5.5 to 9.0) 134 6.9 (5.6 to 8.5) 96 4.9 (3.4 to 6.8) −0.35 (−0.71 to 0.01) .06
6-11 y 167 7.4 (5.6 to 9.7) 177 9.6 (7.7 to 11.8) 223 9.3 (7.3 to 11.6) 238 8.6 (7.3 to 10.2) 0.21 (−0.16 to 0.58) .26
12-19 y 387 12.2 (10.6 to 14.0) 403 11.8 (10.4 to 13.3) 242 11.3 (9.6 to 13.2) 242 10.9 (9.1 to 12.8) −0.28 (−0.63 to 0.06) .11
Sex
Boys 403 9.4 (7.3 to 11.8) 436 9.8 (8.4 to 11.3) 385 9.4 (7.8 to 11.3) 361 8.7 (7.5 to 10.1) −0.04 (−0.38 to 0.30) .81
Girls 393 9.3 (7.9 to 10.8) 411 10.0 (9.0 to 11.1) 315 9.3 (7.9 to 10.8) 277 8.1 (6.9 to 9.5) −0.30 (−0.57 to −0.04) .03
Race and Hispanic originc
Non-Hispanic white 318 11.1 (9.1 to 13.3) 320 11.5 (10.2 to 12.9) 274 10.7 (9.2 to 12.4) 189 9.5 (8.1 to 11.0) −0.28 (−0.62 to 0.07) .12
Non-Hispanic black 181 6.4 (4.9 to 8.3) 250 8.0 (6.7 to 9.3) 154 8.5 (6.9 to 10.4) 202 9.2 (7.6 to 11.0) 0.44 (0.12 to 0.76) .009
Mexican American 199 5.0 (4.3 to 5.8) 199 6.1 (4.9 to 7.5) 155 6.7 (5.3 to 8.3) 104 6.6 (4.9 to 8.5) 0.22 (−0.06 to 0.50) .13
a

Source: National Center for Health Statistics, National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1999-2014. Prevalence estimates are weighted to account for differential probabilities of selection and survey nonresponse.

b

The estimate (β), 95% CI, and P value were calculated using linear regression models that included the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2-y cycle as a continuous variable. The estimate (β) can be interpreted as the average percentage point change in prevalence every 2 y.

c

Categories “other Hispanic” and “other” not shown.

From 1999-2000 to 2013-2014, 84% of medication names were recorded from medication containers, and in 2013-2014, 1.2% were recorded from pharmacy printouts. Estimates were calculated for 40 therapeutic classes and subclasses or individual medications (Table 3), or 89.6% of all medications reported. In 1999-2002, the 5 most commonly used prescription medication classes among children and adolescents were antibiotics (8.4%), asthma medications (4.3%), antihistamines (4.3%), topical agents (3.2%), and ADHD medications (2.8%), and in 2011-2014 the 5 most commonly used medication classes were asthma medications (6.1%), antibiotics (4.5%), ADHD medications (3.5%), topical agents (3.5%), and antihistamines (2.0%).

Table 3. Trends in Prevalence of Prescription Medication Use in the Prior 30 Days Among Children and Adolescents Aged 0 to 19 Years, by Therapeutic Class: United States, 1999-2014a.

Therapeutic Class Prevalence, % (95% CI) β (95% CI)b P Value for Trendb
1999-2002
(n = 10 706)
2003-2006
(n = 10 441)
2007-2010
(n = 8530)
2011-2014
(n = 8600)
ADHD medications 2.8 (2.3 to 3.4) 2.9 (2.3 to 3.5) 4.0 (3.3 to 4.8) 3.5 (2.9 to 4.2) 0.15 (0.03 to 0.28) .02
Antiadrenergic agents (centrally acting) 0.4 (0.2 to 0.7) 0.3 (0.2 to 0.5) 0.4 (0.2 to 0.8)c 0.9 (0.6 to 1.2) 0.09 (0.04 to 0.13) <.001
CNS stimulants 2.7 (2.2 to 3.3) 2.4 (1.9 to 2.9) 3.6 (2.9 to 4.4) 3.0 (2.4 to 3.7) 0.10 (−0.02 to 0.23) .11
Amphetamines 1.0 (0.7 to 1.5) 0.9 (0.6 to 1.2) 2.0 (1.4 to 2.6) 1.3 (0.9 to 1.8) 0.10 (0.02 to 0.19) .02
Methylphenidate or dexmethylphenidate 1.6 (1.3 to 2.0) 1.5 (1.1 to 2.0) 1.7 (1.2 to 2.2) 1.7 (1.2 to 2.3) 0.01 (−0.09 to 0.11) .82
SNRI (atomoxetine) NAd 0.5 (0.3 to 0.6) 0.4 (0.2 to 0.7) 0.4 (0.2 to 0.7)c NAd NAd
Antibiotics 8.4 (7.1 to 9.9) 7.3 (6.0 to 8.7) 6.0 (5.0 to 7.1) 4.5 (3.7 to 5.5) −0.62 (−0.86 to −0.38) <.001
Amoxicillin 3.8 (3.1 to 4.7) 2.5 (2.0 to 3.2) 2.7 (2.1 to 3.4) 2.0 (1.4 to 2.8) −0.24 (−0.38 to −0.10) <.001
Amoxicillin/clavulanate 0.9 (0.6 to 1.3) 0.8 (0.5 to 1.3) 0.4 (0.2 to 0.6) 0.3 (0.1 to 0.6)c −0.10 (−0.17 to −0.04) .003
Cephalosporins 1.1 (0.8 to 1.6) 1.4 (0.9 to 2.0) 1.1 (0.6 to 1.7) 0.6 (0.3 to 0.9) −0.10 (−0.17 to −0.02) .01
Macrolides 1.2 (0.8 to 1.7) 1.0 (0.6 to 1.4) 0.7 (0.4 to 1.0) 0.8 (0.5 to 1.3) −0.06 (−0.13 to 0.02) .15
Azithromycin 0.7 (0.4 to 1.2) 0.7 (0.5 to 1.2) 0.6 (0.4 to 0.9) 0.8 (0.5 to 1.2) 0.01 (−0.06 to 0.07) .81
Tetracyclines 0.7 (0.5 to 1.0) 0.8 (0.5 to 1.3) 0.6 (0.3 to 0.9) 0.6 (0.3 to 1.1)c −0.04 (−0.10 to 0.03) .26
Anticonvulsants 0.8 (0.5 to 1.2) 0.6 (0.4 to 0.9) 0.7 (0.5 to 1.0) 0.8 (0.5 to 1.3) −0.01 (−0.09 to 0.07) .85
Antidepressants 2.0 (1.7 to 2.4) 1.5 (1.1 to 1.9) 1.6 (1.1 to 2.3) 1.6 (1.0 to 2.3) −0.07 (−0.17 to 0.04) .21
SSRIs 1.4 (1.1 to 1.7) 1.1 (0.8 to 1.5) 1.2 (0.8 to 1.7) 1.0 (0.6 to 1.5) −0.07 (−0.14 to 0.00) .06
Antidiabetic agents 0.2 (0.1 to 0.4) 0.2 (0.1 to 0.4) 0.3 (0.2 to 0.5) 0.4 (0.2 to 0.8)c 0.03 (−0.01 to 0.08) .15
Antihistamines 4.3 (3.6 to 5.0) 3.2 (2.7 to 3.9) 1.9 (1.5 to 2.5) 2.0 (1.7 to 2.5) −0.37 (−0.49 to −0.26) <.001
Antihypertensive agents 0.2 (0.1 to 0.4)c 0.3 (0.1 to 0.5) 0.3 (0.2 to 0.6) 0.4 (0.2 to 0.8)c 0.02 (−0.02 to 0.07) .31
Antipsychotics 0.4 (0.3 to 0.7) 0.5 (0.4 to 0.8) 0.6 (0.4 to 0.9) 0.6 (0.5 to 0.8) 0.04 (0.00 to 0.07) .06
Anxiolytics, sedatives, and hypnotics 0.6 (0.5 to 0.8) 0.5 (0.3 to 0.7) 0.4 (0.3 to 0.7) 0.6 (0.4 to 0.9) −0.01 (−0.05 to 0.03) .62
Asthma medications 4.3 (3.6 to 5.1) 5.8 (5.2 to 6.5) 6.6 (5.9 to 7.4) 6.1 (5.4 to 6.8) 0.25 (0.11 to 0.40) <.001
Bronchodilators 3.9 (3.2 to 4.6) 4.7 (4.1 to 5.3) 5.3 (4.6 to 6.1) 4.3 (3.7 to 4.9) 0.06 (−0.08 to 0.19) .40
Albuterol 3.5 (2.9 to 4.3) 4.0 (3.6 to 4.4) 4.5 (4.0 to 5.1) 3.8 (3.3 to 4.4) 0.03 (−0.10 to 0.16) .61
Inhaled corticosteroids 1.0 (0.7 to 1.3) 1.1 (0.8 to 1.4) 1.6 (1.3 to 2.0) 1.7 (1.4 to 2.1) 0.20 (0.12 to 0.27) <.001
Montelukast 0.6 (0.4 to 0.9) 1.8 (1.4 to 2.4) 2.2 (1.7 to 2.9) 1.9 (1.5 to 2.5) 0.15 (0.08 to 0.21) <.001
Contraceptivese 0.9 (0.6 to 1.3) 1.2 (0.9 to 1.8) 1.5 (1.0 to 2.0) 1.8 (1.3 to 2.3) 0.26 (0.11 to 0.41) .004
Glucocorticoids 0.8 (0.6 to 1.0) 1.1 (0.9 to 1.4) 1.6 (1.3 to 2.0) 0.9 (0.6 to 1.3) 0.02 (−0.04 to 0.09) .43
H2 antagonists 0.3 (0.2 to 0.6) 0.4 (0.2 to 0.7) 0.6 (0.4 to 0.9) 0.5 (0.3 to 0.7) 0.03 (−0.01 to 0.07) .16
Narcotic-containing analgesics 1.0 (0.6 to 1.6) 0.9 (0.6 to 1.2) 0.7 (0.5 to 0.9) 0.6 (0.4 to 0.9) −0.06 (−0.13 to 0.01) .11
Proton pump inhibitors 0.2 (0.1 to 0.4) 0.5 (0.3 to 0.8) 0.7 (0.4 to 1.0) 0.7 (0.4 to 1.1) 0.08 (0.03 to 0.13) .004
Topical agents 3.2 (2.6 to 3.8) 4.0 (3.5 to 4.5) 3.4 (2.8 to 4.1) 3.5 (3.0 to 4.1) 0.03 (−0.07 to 0.14) .55
Dermatological agents 1.2 (0.9 to 1.6) 1.5 (1.1 to 2.0) 1.2 (1.0 to 1.5) 1.3 (1.0 to 1.6) 0.01 (−0.07 to 0.08) .89
Topical acne agents 0.6 (0.4 to 0.8) 0.4 (0.2 to 0.8) 0.3 (0.2 to 0.5) 0.5 (0.2 to 0.9)c −0.01 (−0.07 to 0.04) .70
Topical steroids 0.4 (0.2 to 0.6) 0.4 (0.2 to 0.7) 0.6 (0.4 to 0.8) 0.5 (0.3 to 0.6) 0.03 (−0.01 to 0.06) .18
Nasal steroids 1.1 (0.8 to 1.5) 1.9 (1.5 to 2.3) 1.3 (1.0 to 1.8) 1.6 (1.2 to 2.1) 0.04 (−0.05 to 0.13) .36
Mometasone nasal 0.3 (0.1 to 0.5) 0.7 (0.4 to 1.0) 0.4 (0.3 to 0.7) 0.7 (0.4 to 1.1) 0.04 (−0.01 to 0.09) .14
Ophthalmic preparations 0.2 (0.1 to 0.4) 0.5 (0.3 to 0.7) 0.5 (0.3 to 0.7) 0.5 (0.3 to 0.8) 0.03 (0.00 to 0.07) .07
Otic preparations 0.5 (0.3 to 0.7) 0.2 (0.1 to 0.4)c 0.4 (0.2 to 0.7) 0.3 (0.1 to 0.5)c −0.02 (−0.05 to 0.02) .44
Upper respiratory combination medications 2.3 (1.5 to 3.2) 2.1 (1.5 to 2.8) 1.3 (0.9 to 1.7) 0.5 (0.2 to 0.9) −0.29 (−0.40 to −0.19) <.001

Abbreviations: ADHD, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder; CNS, central nervous system; H2, histamine H2-receptor; NA, not available; SNRI, selective norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor; SSRI, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor.

a

Source: National Center for Health Statistics, National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1999-2014. Prevalence estimates are weighted to account for differential probabilities of selection and survey nonresponse. Individual prescription medications or therapeutic subclasses presented in this table were reported by at least 10 children or adolescents during at least 2 of the 4-y periods.

b

The estimate (β), 95% CI, and P value were calculated using linear regression models that included the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2-y cycle as a continuous variable. The estimate (β) can be interpreted as the average biannual percentage point change in prevalence.

c

Estimate may be unreliable because of relative standard error greater than 30% but less than 40%.

d

Atomoxetine was approved in 2002. Prevalence in 1999-2002, β, and P value for trend over 1999-2014 could not be calculated.

e

Limited to girls only.

Among children and adolescents aged 0 to 19 years there were significant linear trends from 1999-2002 and 2011-2014 in 14 therapeutic classes or subclasses, or in individual medications, with 6 demonstrating decreases and 8 demonstrating increases (Table 3). Use of ADHD medications increased from 2.8% to 3.5% (β = 0.15 percentage points every 2 years [95% CI, 0.03 to 0.28]; P = .02) with significant increases in use of both centrally acting antiadrenergic agents and amphetamines. Overall antibiotic use decreased from 8.4% to 4.5% (β = −0.62 percentage points every 2 years [95% CI, −0.86 to −0.38]; P < .001) and specifically for cephalosporins, amoxicillin, and amoxicillin/clavulanate. Antihistamine use decreased from 4.3% to 2.0% (β = −0.37 percentage points every 2 years [95% CI, −0.49 to −0.26]; P < .001). Use of asthma medications increased from 4.3% to 6.1% (β = 0.25 percentage points every 2 years [95% CI, 0.11 to 0.40]; P < .001), with significant increases in use of montelukast and inhaled corticosteroids. Contraceptive use among girls increased from 0.9% to 1.8% (β = 0.26 percentage points every 2 years [95% CI, 0.11 to 0.41]; P = .004). Use of proton pump inhibitors increased from 0.2% to 0.7% (β = 0.08 percentage points every 2 years [95% CI, 0.03 to 0.13]; P = .004), and use of upper respiratory combination medications decreased from 2.3% to 0.5% (β = −0.29 percentage points every 2 years [95% CI, −0.40 to −0.19]; P < .001). No statistically significant linear trends were observed among other therapeutic classes, including antidepressants, anticonvulsants, antihypertensive agents, antidiabetic agents, and topical agents.

Among children aged 0 to 23 months, all antibiotic use decreased from 15.5% to 7.6% (β = −1.12 percentage points every 2 years [95% CI, −1.62 to −0.61]; P < .001) and specifically for amoxicillin and amoxicillin/clavulanate (Table 4). Use of upper respiratory combination medications also decreased from 4.3% to 1.1% (β = −0.53 percentage points every 2 years [95% CI, −0.79 to −0.27]; P < .001). However, no statistically significant linear trends were observed among other therapeutic classes, including antihistamines, asthma medications, and topical agents.

Table 4. Trends in Prevalence of Prescription Medication Use in the Prior 30 Days Among Children Aged 0 to 23 Months, by Therapeutic Class: United States, 1999-2014a.

Therapeutic Class Prevalence, % (95% CI) β (95% CI)b P Value for Trendb
1999-2002
(n = 1646)
2003-2006
(n = 1699)
2007-2010
(n = 1539)
2011-2014
(n = 1288)
Antibiotics 15.5 (12.6 to 18.7) 10.9 (8.8 to 13.1) 11.7 (9.3 to 14.5) 7.6 (6.2 to 9.1) −1.12 (−1.62 to −0.61) <.001
Amoxicillin 8.9 (7.0 to 11.2) 5.7 (4.3 to 7.5) 6.6 (4.9 to 8.6) 4.9 (3.8 to 6.2) −0.52 (−0.87 to −0.18) .004
Amoxicillin/clavulanate 2.1 (1.3 to 3.1) 1.6 (0.7 to 3.1)c 0.7 (0.3 to 1.5)c 0.4 (0.0 to 1.6)d,e −0.26 (−0.40 to −0.11) <.001
Cephalosporins 2.6 (1.6 to 4.2) 2.4 (1.3 to 3.9) 2.4 (1.1 to 4.5)c 1.7 (0.8 to 3.1) −0.15 (−0.41 to 0.11) .27
Macrolides 1.7 (1.0 to 2.8) 1.6 (0.8 to 2.8) 1.7 (0.9 to 2.8) 0.9 (0.3 to 2.1)f −0.13 (−0.31 to 0.05) .16
Azithromycin 1.5 (0.8 to 2.5) 1.4 (0.7 to 2.6) 1.4 (0.7 to 2.6) 0.8 (0.2 to 2.1)f −0.10 (−0.27 to 0.08) .27
Antihistamines 1.6 (0.7 to 2.9)c 1.6 (0.9 to 2.5) 1.4 (0.8 to 2.4) 0.7 (0.3 to 1.3)c −0.09 (−0.23 to 0.05) .20
Asthma medications 4.1 (3.1 to 5.3) 4.5 (3.3 to 5.9) 5.1 (4.0 to 6.3) 2.8 (2.0 to 3.8) −0.16 (−0.36 to 0.04) .12
Bronchodilators 3.6 (2.7 to 4.8) 3.9 (2.7 to 5.4) 3.8 (2.6 to 5.4) 2.5 (1.7 to 3.5) −0.18 (−0.38 to 0.02) .09
Albuterol 2.8 (2.0 to 3.9) 3.8 (2.7 to 5.2) 3.1 (2.2 to 4.3) 2.3 (1.5 to 3.2) −0.12 (−0.29 to 0.06) .19
Inhaled corticosteroids 1.0 (0.4 to 1.8)c 1.8 (1.0 to 2.8) 1.8 (1.1 to 2.8) 0.6 (0.3 to 1.3) −0.02 (−0.14 to 0.11) .79
Glucocorticoids 1.6 (0.9 to 2.7) 2.2 (1.3 to 3.5) 2.2 (1.3 to 3.3) 1.1 (0.5 to 2.3)c −0.05 (−0.23 to 0.13) .56
H2 antagonists 1.1 (0.5 to 2.1)c 1.3 (0.7 to 2.0) 1.9 (1.1 to 2.9) 2.1 (1.3 to 3.3) 0.18 (0.00 to 0.36) .06
Topical agents 3.7 (2.6 to 5.1) 3.5 (2.4 to 5.0) 4.2 (2.7 to 6.0) 3.1 (2.0 to 4.5) −0.03 (−0.27 to 0.21) .78
Dermatological agents 1.3 (0.6 to 2.2) 1.6 (0.8 to 2.7) 1.6 (0.8 to 2.8) 1.0 (0.5 to 1.7) −0.02 (−0.17 to 0.14) .83
Topical steroids 0.8 (0.3 to 1.6)c 1.1 (0.5 to 2.1)c 0.8 (0.4 to 1.6)c 0.5 (0.2 to 1.1)c,e −0.04 (−0.17 to 0.08) .50
Upper respiratory combination medications 4.3 (2.6 to 6.7) 3.2 (2.0 to 4.8) 2.1 (1.2 to 3.5) 1.1 (0.5 to 2.1)c −0.53 (−0.79 to −0.27) <.001

Abbreviation: H2, histamine H2-receptor.

a

Source: National Center for Health Statistics, National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1999-2014. Prevalence estimates are weighted to account for differential probabilities of selection and survey nonresponse. Individual prescription medications or therapeutic subclasses presented in this table were reported by at least 10 children during at least 2 of the 4-y periods.

b

The estimate (β), 95% CI, and P value were calculated using linear regression models that included the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2-y cycle as a continuous variable. The estimate (β) can be interpreted as the average percentage point change in prevalence every 2 y.

c

Estimate may be unreliable because of relative standard error greater than 30% but less than 40%.

d

Estimate may be unreliable because of relative standard error greater than 50%.

e

Estimate may be unreliable because of unweighted number less than 10.

f

Estimate may be unreliable because of relative standard error greater than 40% but less than 50%.

Among children aged 2 to 5 years, use of inhaled corticosteroids increased from 1.2% to 2.1% (β = 0.20 percentage points every 2 years [95% CI, 0.02 to 0.39]; P = .03), and use of antihistamines and upper respiratory combination medications decreased 3.1% to 2.3% (β = −0.25 percentage points every 2 years [95% CI, −0.49 to −0.01]; P = .04) and 2.5% to 0.4% (β = −0.39 percentage points every 2 years [95% CI, −0.54 to −0.23]; P < .001), respectively (Table 5). However, no statistically significant linear trends were observed among other therapeutic classes, including antibiotics, glucocorticoids, and topical agents.

Table 5. Trends in Prevalence of Prescription Medication Use in the Prior 30 Days Among Children Aged 2 to 5 Years, by Therapeutic Class: United States, 1999-2014a.

Therapeutic Class Prevalence, % (95% CI) β (95% CI)b P Value for Trendb
1999-2002
(n = 1807)
2003-2006
(n = 1977)
2007-2010
(n = 1898)
2011-2014
(n = 1910)
Antibiotics 9.1 (7.0 to 11.5) 7.3 (5.0 to 10.1) 7.1 (5.2 to 9.5) 5.9 (3.7 to 8.9) −0.43 (−0.88 to 0.02) .07
Amoxicillin 5.0 (3.4 to 7.0) 2.9 (1.7 to 4.7) 4.1 (2.9 to 5.6) 4.0 (1.8 to 7.6)c −0.06 (−0.46 to 0.34) .77
Cephalosporins 0.9 (0.4 to 1.9)c 1.8 (0.8 to 3.3)c 1.0 (0.5 to 1.8)c 0.8 (0.3 to 1.6)c −0.07 (−0.20 to 0.07) .34
Macrolides 1.4 (0.7 to 2.5) 1.0 (0.5 to 1.8) 0.6 (0.3 to 1.2)c 0.9 (0.2 to 2.4)d −0.10 (−0.26 to 0.06) .23
Azithromycin 1.1 (0.5 to 2.1)c 0.8 (0.3 to 1.7)c 0.6 (0.3 to 1.2)c 0.9 (0.2 to 2.4)d −0.04 (−0.19 to 0.11) .60
Antihistamines 3.1 (2.0 to 4.6) 3.8 (2.3 to 5.9) 1.1 (0.7 to 1.7) 2.3 (1.4 to 3.6) −0.25 (−0.49 to −0.01) .04
Asthma medications 4.5 (3.2 to 6.1) 6.5 (5.1 to 8.1) 6.9 (5.3 to 8.8) 5.4 (4.1 to 6.9) 0.09 (−0.20 to 0.39) .54
Bronchodilators 3.6 (2.5 to 5.1) 4.7 (3.6 to 6.1) 5.2 (4.1 to 6.5) 3.8 (2.8 to 5.0) 0.03 (−0.22 to 0.27) .84
Albuterol 3.2 (2.2 to 4.4) 3.8 (2.7 to 5.0) 4.6 (3.6 to 5.7) 3.5 (2.5 to 4.7) 0.05 (−0.18 to 0.28) .66
Inhaled corticosteroids 1.2 (0.5 to 2.3)c 2.0 (1.1 to 3.2) 2.7 (1.8 to 3.8) 2.1 (1.2 to 3.4) 0.20 (0.02 to 0.39) .03
Montelukast 0.8 (0.4 to 1.6)c 2.0 (1.2 to 3.0) 2.4 (1.4 to 3.8) 1.2 (0.7 to 2.0) 0.04 (−0.09 to 0.17) .55
Glucocorticoids 1.1 (0.6 to 1.9) 1.4 (0.8 to 2.3) 2.5 (1.8 to 3.4) 1.3 (0.6 to 2.4) 0.06 (−0.09 to 0.21) .44
Topical agents 2.8 (1.9 to 3.9) 3.2 (2.1 to 4.5) 3.0 (1.9 to 4.4) 2.5 (1.4 to 4.2) −0.05 (−0.27 to 0.17) .64
Dermatological agents 0.6 (0.2 to 1.1)c 1.2 (0.6 to 2.1) 1.3 (0.8 to 2.1) 0.7 (0.3 to 1.2) 0.02 (−0.07 to 0.11) .61
Nasal steroids 1.0 (0.5 to 2.0)c 1.6 (0.8 to 2.7) 0.4 (0.1 to 1.0)e 1.1 (0.5 to 2.0)c −0.04 (−0.17 to 0.09) .52
Upper respiratory combination medications 2.5 (1.5 to 3.9) 3.1 (2.0 to 4.5) 1.6 (1.0 to 2.4) 0.4 (0.1 to 0.8)c,f −0.39 (−0.54 to −0.23) <.001
a

Source: National Center for Health Statistics, National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1999-2014. Prevalence estimates are weighted to account for differential probabilities of selection and survey nonresponse. Individual prescription medications or therapeutic subclasses presented in this table were reported by at least 10 children during at least 2 of the 4-y periods.

b

The estimate (β), 95% CI, and P value were calculated using linear regression models that included the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2-y cycle as a continuous variable. The estimate (β) can be interpreted as the average percentage point change in prevalence every 2 y.

c

Estimate may be unreliable because of relative standard error greater than 30% but less than 40%.

d

Estimate may be unreliable because of relative standard error greater than 50%.

e

Estimate may be unreliable because of relative standard error greater than 40% but less than 50%.

f

Estimate may be unreliable because of unweighted number less than 10.

Among children aged 6 to 11 years, use of ADHD medications increased from 4.8% to 6.2% (β = 0.32 percentage points every 2 years [95% CI, 0.04 to 0.59]; P = .03) and specifically for amphetamines (Table 6). Significant decreases in all antibiotic use occurred (6.1% to 2.7%, β = −0.52 percentage points every 2 years [95% CI, −0.91 to −0.14]; P = .009) and specifically for amoxicillin. Antihistamine use decreased from 4.8% to 3.0% (β = −0.27 percentage points every 2 years [95% CI, −0.51 to −0.02]; P = .04), and antipsychotic use increased from 0.5% to 1.2% (β = 0.13 percentage points every 2 years [95% CI, 0.04 to 0.22]; P = .006). Asthma medication use increased from 4.6% to 7.6% (β = 0.50 percentage points every 2 years [95% CI, 0.16 to 0.83]; P = .004) and specifically for montelukast and inhaled corticosteroids. Use of proton pump inhibitors and dermatologic agents increased from 0.1% to 0.7% (β = 0.10 percentage points every 2 years [95% CI, 0.02 to 0.19]; P = .02) and 0.5% to 1.2% (β = 0.11 percentage points every 2 years [95% CI, 0.03 to 0.20]; P = .009), respectively, and use of upper respiratory combination medications decreased from 1.8% to 0.6% (β = −0.21 percentage points every 2 years [95% CI, −0.36 to −0.06]; P = .007). However, no statistically significant linear trends were observed among other therapeutic classes, including anticonvulsants; antidepressants; and anxiolytics, sedatives, and hypnotics.

Table 6. Trends in Prevalence of Prescription Medication Use in the Prior 30 Days Among Children Aged 6 to 11 Years, by Therapeutic Class: United States, 1999-2014a.

Therapeutic Class Prevalence, % (95% CI) β (95% CI)b P Value for Trendb
1999-2002
(n = 2353)
2003-2006
(n = 2178)
2007-2010
(n = 2519)
2011-2014
(n = 2698)
ADHD medications 4.8 (3.7 to 5.9) 4.6 (3.4 to 6.0) 6.0 (4.9 to 7.3) 6.2 (4.8 to 7.8) 0.32 (0.04 to 0.59) .03
Antiadrenergic agents (centrally acting) 1.1 (0.5 to 2.0)c 0.8 (0.4 to 1.3) 0.6 (0.2 to 1.4)d 1.6 (0.9 to 2.6) 0.11 (−0.03 to 0.24) .14
CNS stimulants 4.3 (3.4 to 5.5) 3.6 (2.6 to 4.9) 5.3 (4.3 to 6.5) 5.3 (4.0 to 7.0) 0.25 (−0.03 to 0.52) .08
Amphetamines 1.3 (0.7 to 2.3) 1.2 (0.6 to 2.2) 2.8 (2.0 to 4.0) 2.1 (1.5 to 2.7) 0.21 (0.07 to 0.35) .005
Methylphenidate or dexmethylphenidate 3.0 (2.0 to 4.3) 2.4 (1.4 to 3.7) 2.5 (1.6 to 3.6) 3.3 (2.2 to 4.9) 0.05 (−0.22 to 0.31) .73
SNRI (atomoxetine) NAe 0.8 (0.5 to 1.3) 0.8 (0.3 to 1.4)c 0.6 (0.2 to 1.3)d NAe NAe
Antibiotics 6.1 (4.1 to 8.6) 5.8 (4.1 to 7.9) 4.8 (3.5 to 6.3) 2.7 (1.8 to 4.0) −0.52 (−0.91 to −0.14) .009
Amoxicillin 3.7 (2.6 to 5.0) 2.5 (1.5 to 3.9) 2.5 (1.7 to 3.4) 1.0 (0.6 to 1.5) −0.39 (−0.58 to −0.19) <.001
Cephalosporins 0.7 (0.3 to 1.5)c 1.2 (0.5 to 2.3)c 1.1 (0.6 to 1.8) 0.4 (0.1 to 1.1)f,g −0.04 (−0.14 to 0.06) .41
Macrolides 0.7 (0.3 to 1.6)c 0.6 (0.2 to 1.5)d,g 0.7 (0.3 to 1.3)c 0.8 (0.3 to 1.5)c 0.04 (−0.08 to 0.15) .56
Azithromycin 0.5 (0.1 to 1.5)f,g 0.4 (0.1 to 1.1)f,g 0.6 (0.3 to 1.2)c 0.7 (0.3 to 1.4)c 0.07 (−0.04 to 0.18) .21
Anticonvulsants 0.2 (0.1 to 0.6)d,g 0.8 (0.3 to 1.6)c 0.6 (0.3 to 1.2)c 0.8 (0.3 to 1.5)c 0.06 (−0.02 to 0.15) .16
Antidepressants 1.5 (0.8 to 2.4) 0.6 (0.2 to 1.4)c,g 0.9 (0.4 to 1.6) 0.5 (0.2 to 1.2)c −0.12 (−0.26 to 0.02) .10
SSRIs 0.8 (0.4 to 1.4) 0.4 (0.1 to 1.0)f,g 0.5 (0.2 to 0.9)c 0.4 (0.2 to 0.9)c,g −0.04 (−0.14 to 0.05) .33
Antihistamines 4.8 (3.5 to 6.5) 3.3 (2.4 to 4.5) 2.6 (1.8 to 3.7) 3.0 (2.1 to 4.1) −0.27 (−0.51 to −0.02) .04
Antipsychotics 0.5 (0.2 to 1.1)d,g 0.4 (0.2 to 0.8)c 0.9 (0.4 to 1.7)c 1.2 (0.8 to 1.7) 0.13 (0.04 to 0.22) .006
Anxiolytics, sedatives, and hypnotics 0.5 (0.2 to 1.1)c 0.4 (0.2 to 0.9)c 0.5 (0.3 to 1.0)c 0.6 (0.3 to 1.2)c 0.02 (−0.07 to 0.11) .69
Asthma medications 4.6 (3.2 to 6.4) 6.5 (5.0 to 8.2) 8.2 (6.6 to 10.1) 7.6 (6.4 to 9.0) 0.50 (0.16 to 0.83) .004
Bronchodilators 4.2 (2.8 to 6.0) 5.1 (3.7 to 6.7) 6.0 (4.9 to 7.3) 4.8 (3.9 to 5.7) 0.11 (−0.19 to 0.41) .47
Albuterol 4.1 (2.7 to 5.9) 4.3 (3.4 to 5.5) 5.1 (4.1 to 6.2) 4.0 (3.3 to 4.9) 0.01 (−0.28 to 0.30) .95
Inhaled corticosteroids 0.9 (0.4 to 1.7)c 1.0 (0.6 to 1.6) 2.2 (1.6 to 3.0) 2.4 (1.7 to 3.3) 0.30 (0.16 to 0.44) <.001
Montelukast 0.7 (0.3 to 1.4)c 2.7 (1.5 to 4.2) 3.8 (2.5 to 5.5) 3.0 (2.1 to 4.0) 0.38 (0.23 to 0.53) <.001
Glucocorticoids 0.6 (0.3 to 1.0) 1.5 (1.0 to 2.1) 1.4 (0.9 to 2.0) 0.8 (0.5 to 1.3) 0.02 (−0.07 to 0.11) .70
Proton pump inhibitors 0.1 (0.0 to 0.6)f,g 0.4 (0.1 to 0.9)d,g 0.9 (0.4 to 1.6) 0.7 (0.2 to 1.5)d 0.10 (0.02 to 0.19) .02
Topical agents 2.6 (1.7 to 3.6) 4.2 (3.0 to 5.7) 3.3 (2.4 to 4.4) 3.7 (2.8 to 4.9) 0.15 (−0.05 to 0.36) .14
Dermatological agents 0.5 (0.2 to 1.0)c 0.8 (0.3 to 1.8)c 0.7 (0.4 to 1.3) 1.2 (0.8 to 1.7) 0.11 (0.03 to 0.20) .009
Nasal steroids 1.5 (0.7 to 2.7)c 2.7 (1.8 to 4.0) 1.9 (1.4 to 2.5) 2.0 (1.3 to 2.9) 0.06 (−0.13 to 0.25) .55
Mometasone nasal 0.2 (0.0 to 0.6)f,g 1.2 (0.6 to 2.1) 0.6 (0.3 to 1.1) 0.8 (0.4 to 1.5)c 0.07 (−0.03 to 0.17) .16
Upper respiratory combination medications 1.8 (1.0 to 3.0) 1.8 (1.0 to 2.9) 1.2 (0.6 to 2.0) 0.6 (0.2 to 1.5)d −0.21 (−0.36 to −0.06) .007

Abbreviations: ADHD, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder; CNS, central nervous system; NA, not available; SNRI, selective norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor; SSRI, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor.

a

Source: National Center for Health Statistics, National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1999-2014. Prevalence estimates are weighted to account for differential probabilities of selection and survey nonresponse. Individual prescription medications or therapeutic subclasses presented in this table were reported by at least 10 children or adolescents during at least 2 of the 4-y periods.

b

The estimate (β), 95% CI, and P value were calculated using linear regression models that included the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2-y cycle as a continuous variable. The estimate (β) can be interpreted as the average percentage point change in prevalence every 2 y.

c

Estimate may be unreliable because of relative standard error greater than 30% but less than 40%.

d

Estimate may be unreliable because of relative standard error greater than 40% but less than 50%.

e

Atomoxetine was approved in 2002. Prevalence in 1999-2002, β, and P value for trend over 1999-2014 could not be calculated.

f

Estimate may be unreliable because of relative standard error greater than 50%.

g

Estimate may be unreliable because of unweighted number less than 10.

Among adolescents aged 12 to 19 years, use of centrally acting antiadrenergic agents (clonidine and guanfacine) increased from 0.1% to 0.9% (β = 0.13 percentage points every 2 years [95% CI, 0.06 to 0.20]; P < .001), but statistically significant linear trends were not observed in central nervous system stimulants or in ADHD medications overall (Table 7). Significant decreases in all antibiotic use from 8.2% to 4.5% (β = −0.67 percentage points every 2 years [95% CI, −0.97 to −0.38]; P < .001) occurred and specifically for cephalosporins and amoxicillin. Antihypertensive agent use increased from 0.2% to 0.8% (β = 0.10 percentage points every 2 years [95% CI, 0.00 to 0.19]; P = .04), and antihistamine use decreased from 5.1% to 1.5% (β = −0.57 percentage points every 2 years [95% CI, −0.74 to −0.40]; P < .001). Use of asthma medication increased from 4.0% to 6.0% (β = 0.25 percentage points every 2 years [95% CI, 0.04 to 0.47]; P = .02) and specifically for montelukast. Contraceptive use among adolescent girls increased from 4.6% to 8.8% (β = 0.63 percentage points every 2 years [95% CI, 0.27 to 0.99]; P < .001). Use of upper respiratory combination medications decreased from 2.0% to 0.3% (β = −0.26 percentage points every 2 years [95% CI, −0.37 to −0.14]; P < .001). The prevalence of narcotic-containing analgesics was 1.2% in 2011-2014, with no statistically significant linear trend observed (β = −0.10 percentage points every 2 years [95% CI, −0.25 to 0.06]; P = .23).

Table 7. Trends in Prevalence of Prescription Medication Use in the Prior 30 Days Among Adolescents Aged 12 to 19 Years, by Therapeutic Class: United States, 1999-2014a.

Therapeutic Class Prevalence, % (95% CI) β (95% CI)b P Value for Trendb
1999-2002
(n = 4900)
2003-2006
(n = 4587)
2007-2010
(n = 2574)
2011-2014
(n = 2704)
ADHD medications 3.2 (2.2 to 4.5) 3.7 (2.8 to 4.9) 5.3 (3.8 to 7.1) 3.8 (2.7 to 5.2) 0.12 (−0.10 to 0.34) .29
Antiadrenergic agents, centrally acting 0.1 (0.0 to 0.4)c,d 0.2 (0.1 to 0.5)d,e 0.6 (0.2 to 1.4)e 0.9 (0.5 to 1.4) 0.13 (0.06 to 0.20) <.001
CNS stimulants 3.1 (2.1 to 4.4) 3.1 (2.4 to 4.1) 4.9 (3.4 to 6.8) 3.2 (2.2 to 4.5) 0.06 (−0.16 to 0.28) .60
Amphetamines 1.4 (0.8 to 2.1) 1.3 (0.7 to 2.0) 2.7 (1.6 to 4.3) 1.6 (0.9 to 2.6) 0.10 (−0.05 to 0.25) .18
Methylphenidate or dexmethylphenidate 1.7 (1.2 to 2.4) 1.9 (1.3 to 2.6) 2.2 (1.4 to 3.3) 1.7 (1.0 to 2.6) −0.02 (−0.15 to 0.11) .75
SNRI (atomoxetine) NAf 0.5 (0.2 to 1.0)g 0.4 (0.2 to 0.7)g 0.5 (0.1 to 1.3)c,d NAf NAf
Antibiotics 8.2 (7.0 to 9.5) 7.5 (6.1 to 9.1) 5.0 (3.6 to 6.6) 4.5 (3.0 to 6.6) −0.67 (−0.97 to −0.38) <.001
Amoxicillin 2.2 (1.5 to 3.1) 1.5 (1.1 to 2.0) 1.2 (0.5 to 2.3)g 1.2 (0.6 to 2.0) −0.15 (−0.29 to 0.00) .05
Cephalosporins 1.2 (0.8 to 1.7) 1.1 (0.6 to 1.8) 0.8 (0.3 to 1.5)g 0.4 (0.1 to 0.9)d,e −0.14 (−0.24 to −0.05) .004
Macrolides 1.3 (0.9 to 1.8) 1.0 (0.5 to 1.9)g 0.5 (0.2 to 1.1)e 0.9 (0.4 to 1.8)g −0.09 (−0.19 to 0.01) .09
Azithromycin 0.5 (0.3 to 0.9) 0.8 (0.3 to 1.6)g 0.4 (0.1 to 1.0)c,d 0.8 (0.3 to 1.7)g 0.01 (−0.08 to 0.10) .83
Tetracyclines 1.8 (1.2 to 2.5) 2.0 (1.3 to 3.0) 1.4 (0.8 to 2.3) 1.4 (0.7 to 2.6)g −0.10 (−0.25 to 0.05) .20
Anticonvulsants 1.4 (0.9 to 2.1) 0.9 (0.5 to 1.4) 1.1 (0.5 to 2.0)g 1.2 (0.6 to 2.0) −0.03 (−0.17 to 0.11) .70
Antidepressants 3.9 (3.0 to 5.0) 3.1 (2.3 to 4.2) 3.3 (2.1 to 4.8) 3.4 (2.2 to 5.0) −0.09 (−0.31 to 0.14) .46
SSRIs 2.9 (2.2 to 3.8) 2.5 (1.7 to 3.5) 2.5 (1.6 to 3.8) 2.0 (1.3 to 3.2) −0.14 (−0.31 to 0.02) .09
Antidiabetic agents 0.5 (0.2 to 1.0)g 0.4 (0.2 to 0.8)g 0.6 (0.3 to 1.0) 0.9 (0.4 to 1.7)g 0.07 (−0.03 to 0.17) .18
Antihistamines 5.1 (4.2 to 6.0) 3.4 (2.6 to 4.3) 2.0 (1.3 to 2.9) 1.5 (0.9 to 2.3) −0.57 (−0.74 to −0.40) <.001
Antihypertensive agents 0.2 (0.0 to 0.4)d,e 0.4 (0.2 to 0.9)g 0.5 (0.2 to 1.0)g 0.8 (0.3 to 1.7)g 0.10 (0.00 to 0.19) .04
Antipsychotics 0.7 (0.4 to 1.1) 1.0 (0.7 to 1.6) 0.8 (0.4 to 1.5) 0.7 (0.4 to 1.1) 0.00 (−0.07 to 0.08) .95
Anxiolytics, sedatives, and hypnotics 0.6 (0.4 to 0.8) 0.5 (0.2 to 0.8) 0.5 (0.2 to 1.0)g 0.7 (0.4 to 1.1) 0.01 (−0.05 to 0.07) .82
Asthma medications 4.0 (3.1 to 5.1) 5.4 (4.7 to 6.3) 5.7 (4.5 to 7.2) 6.0 (4.9 to 7.2) 0.25 (0.04 to 0.47) .02
Bronchodilators 3.7 (2.9 to 4.8) 4.6 (3.9 to 5.4) 5.3 (4.1 to 6.7) 4.5 (3.5 to 5.7) 0.09 (−0.11 to 0.28) .40
Albuterol 3.4 (2.6 to 4.4) 3.9 (3.3 to 4.5) 4.4 (3.5 to 5.5) 4.1 (3.2 to 5.2) 0.08 (−0.11 to 0.27) .42
Inhaled corticosteroids 0.9 (0.6 to 1.4) 0.5 (0.3 to 0.8) 0.5 (0.2 to 1.2)g 1.2 (0.8 to 1.8) 0.04 (−0.04 to 0.12) .36
Montelukast 0.6 (0.3 to 1.1) 1.5 (1.1 to 2.0) 1.3 (0.7 to 2.2) 1.9 (1.2 to 2.8) 0.17 (0.05 to 0.29) .005
Contraceptivesh 4.6 (3.2 to 6.4) 6.2 (4.4 to 8.4) 7.4 (5.1 to 10.1) 8.8 (6.9 to 11.1) 0.63 (0.27 to 0.99) <.001
Glucocorticoids 0.6 (0.2 to 1.1)g 0.5 (0.3 to 0.8) 1.2 (0.6 to 2.0) 0.6 (0.3 to 1.3)g 0.03 (−0.05 to 0.12) .46
Narcotic-containing analgesics 2.0 (1.1 to 3.4) 1.5 (0.9 to 2.2) 1.5 (1.0 to 2.1) 1.2 (0.7 to 1.9) −0.10 (−0.25 to 0.06) .23
Proton pump inhibitors 0.4 (0.2 to 0.7) 0.7 (0.3 to 1.4)g 0.9 (0.5 to 1.6) 0.9 (0.5 to 1.7) 0.10 (0.00 to 0.19) .04
Topical agents 3.7 (3.0 to 4.5) 4.3 (3.3 to 5.5) 3.5 (2.6 to 4.6) 3.9 (3.1 to 5.0) 0.00 (−0.18 to 0.17) .98
Dermatological agents 2.0 (1.5 to 2.7) 2.1 (1.4 to 3.1) 1.4 (0.9 to 2.1) 1.7 (1.0 to 2.6) −0.08 (−0.23 to 0.06) .26
Topical acne agents 1.4 (1.0 to 1.9) 1.1 (0.5 to 1.9) 0.8 (0.4 to 1.3) 1.0 (0.4 to 2.1)g −0.06 (−0.20 to 0.07) .35
Nasal steroids 1.2 (0.7 to 1.8) 1.8 (1.3 to 2.4) 1.6 (0.9 to 2.6) 1.9 (1.1 to 3.0) 0.08 (−0.08 to 0.23) .34
Upper respiratory combination medications 2.0 (1.3 to 3.0) 1.5 (1.0 to 2.2) 1.0 (0.5 to 1.7) 0.3 (0.1 to 0.7). −0.26 (−0.37 to −0.14) <.001

Abbreviations: ADHD, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder; CNS, central nervous system; NA, not available; SNRI, selective norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor; SSRI, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor.

a

Source: National Center for Health Statistics, National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1999-2014. Prevalence estimates are weighted to account for differential probabilities of selection and survey nonresponse. Individual prescription medications or therapeutic subclasses presented in this table were reported by at least 10 adolescents during at least 2 of the 4-y periods.

b

The estimate (β), 95% CI, and P value were calculated using linear regression models that included the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2-y cycle as a continuous variable. The estimate (β) can be interpreted as the average percentage point change in prevalence every 2 y.

c

Estimate may be unreliable because of relative standard error greater than 50%.

d

Estimate may be unreliable because of unweighted number less than 10.

e

Estimate may be unreliable because of relative standard error greater than 40% but less than 50%.

f

Atomoxetine was approved in 2002. Prevalence in 1999-2002, β, and P value for trend over 1999-2014 could not be calculated.

g

Estimate may be unreliable because of relative standard error greater than 30% but less than 40%.

h

Limited to girls only.

Discussion

In 2011-2014, 21.9% of US children and adolescents used any prescription medication in the prior month, and 8.5% used 2 or more prescription medications. The prevalence of using any medication and 2 or more medications varied by age, race and Hispanic origin, insurance status, and current health status; however, medication use did not differ by sex, household income, or education level of the household head. Overall use of any medication decreased from 1999-2002 to 2011-2014, and use of any and 2 or more medications decreased among children aged 0 to 23 months; however, use of any and 2 or more medications increased among non-Hispanic black children and adolescents.

Trends in prevalence of ADHD medication use from 1999-2002 to 2011-2014 in children aged 6 to 11 years and in adolescents aged 12 to 19 years varied. Use of ADHD medications increased among children aged 6 to 11 years and specifically the use of amphetamines. Among adolescents, there were no statistically significant linear trends in overall use of ADHD medications or central nervous system stimulants, but use of centrally acting antiadrenergic agents (clonidine and guanfacine), commonly used to treat ADHD, increased. New ADHD medications, including lisdexamfetamine and the selective norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor atomoxetine, were introduced during the study period, and guanfacine and clonidine were first approved to treat ADHD in 2009 and 2010.

Antibiotic use in children and adolescents decreased by almost half between 1999-2002 and 2011-2014, predominantly in amoxicillin-containing antibiotics and cephalosporins. Decreases were significant in all age groups except children aged 2 to 5 years. Decreases in antibiotic use among children and adolescents have been previously reported using NHANES25 and other data sources.26,27,28 Children aged 0 to 23 months were the only age group to show decreasing medication use over time, and antibiotics constituted a relatively large proportion of medications used in this age group. This study adds nationally representative age-specific trends for common individual antibiotic classes and provides information for continued monitoring of antibiotic use in children and adolescents to inform programs such as the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Be Antibiotics Aware: Smart Use, Best Care educational effort,16 which promotes awareness of antibiotic resistance and the importance of appropriate antibiotic prescribing.

This study also showed an increase in use of antihypertension medications among adolescents. There was no statistically significant linear trend in use of antidiabetic agents. An expert panel has provided recommendations to optimize cardiovascular health of children and adolescents, including recommendations for pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic treatment of hypertension and diabetes.19 While the expert panel also provided recommendations for interventions to reduce dyslipidemia, too few children and adolescents reported taking cholesterol-lowering medications to present prevalence estimates.

Antipsychotic use increased in children aged 6 to 11 years but not in adolescents. A previous study showed increases in the proportion of outpatient visits that included a prescription of antipsychotics from 1993-1998 to 2005-2009 in both children and adolescents.29 Another study of data from 2009 showed that among claims for antipsychotic prescriptions in children aged 7 to 12 years with a psychiatric diagnosis, ADHD was the most common diagnosis, followed by disruptive behavioral disorders and autism and other pervasive developmental disorders.30

Patterns of asthma medication use were consistent with previously reported trends in asthma prevalence, which increased until a plateau in 2009, with subsequent decreases in children but steady increasing prevalence among adolescents.31 The overall increase in use of montelukast may reflect its introduction in 1998 and incorporation into treatment regimens.

The effectiveness and safety of cough and cold medications have been called into question.3,32 NHANES did not collect data on most over-the-counter medications. While certain upper respiratory combination medications (eg, those containing codeine) could be obtained by prescription only, many formulations were available both by prescription and over the counter (eTable in the Supplement). Moreover, certain antihistamines became available over the counter during the study period. This study showed a marked decrease in the use of prescription upper respiratory combination medications and prescription antihistamines overall; decreases also occurred within each age category.

NHANES has several strengths for surveillance of trends in prescription medication use among children and adolescents. NHANES data are nationally representative and included the medication name and linkage to Multum Lexicon Plus therapeutic drug categories. Recording the names of prescription drugs from the medication container by trained personnel strengthened validity and completeness. This study provided more recent estimates over a wider age range then those published using the Slone Survey, a nationally representative telephone survey that included 2857 children younger than 12 years from 1998-2007.6 NHANES data have also been used for surveillance of prescription medication trends among adults 20 years or older,33 and Health, United States periodically publishes estimates of prescription medication use using NHANES data by therapeutic category.34

Limitations

This study has several limitations. First, NHANES did not capture dosages, formulations, or frequency of use, nor did it collect data on most over-the-counter medications. Second, although survey staff worked to capture all prescription medication use, underreporting is possible. Third, because of small sample sizes, estimates could be calculated for only the most common therapeutic classes of prescription medications and individual medications. Interpreting trends in outcomes with low prevalence is difficult in complex surveys, including NHANES, because of uncertainty in the distribution of the outcome and appropriate methods for statistical testing. Large samples are desirable for such analyses, and strategies could include combining NHANES cycles and avoiding analysis of small subgroups. Fourth, because there was no adjustment for multiple comparisons, there is the potential for type I error.

Conclusions

In this study of US children and adolescents based on a nationally representative survey, estimates of prescription medication use showed an overall decrease in use of any medication from 1999-2014. The prevalence of asthma medication, ADHD medication, and contraceptive use increased among certain age groups, whereas use of antibiotics, antihistamines, and upper respiratory combination medications decreased.

Supplement.

eTable. Classification of Prescription Medications Reported by NHANES Participants Aged 0-19 Years From 1999-2000 to 2013-2014 by Therapeutic Class

References

  • 1.Shehab N, Lovegrove MC, Geller AI, Rose KO, Weidle NJ, Budnitz DS. US emergency department visits for outpatient adverse drug events, 2013-2014. JAMA. 2016;316(20):2115-2125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Johann-Liang R, Wyeth J, Chen M, Cope JU. Pediatric drug surveillance and the Food and Drug Administration’s adverse event reporting system: an overview of reports, 2003-2007. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2009;18(1):24-27. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Vernacchio L, Kelly JP, Kaufman DW, Mitchell AA. Cough and cold medication use by US children, 1999-2006: results from the Slone Survey. Pediatrics. 2008;122(2):e323-e329. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Tobias JD, Green TP, Coté CJ; Section on Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine; Committee on Drugs . Codeine: time to say “no.” Pediatrics. 2016;138(4):e20162396. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Youngster I, Avorn J, Belleudi V, et al. . Antibiotic use in children—a cross-national analysis of 6 countries. J Pediatr. 2017;182:239-244. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Vernacchio L, Kelly JP, Kaufman DW, Mitchell AA. Medication use among children <12 years of age in the United States: results from the Slone Survey. Pediatrics. 2009;124(2):446-454. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Johnson CL, Dohrmann SM, Burt VL, Mohadjer LK. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey: sample design, 2011-2014. Vital Health Stat 2. 2014;(162):1-33. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.National Center for Health Statistics, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) NHANES Response Rates. CDC website. https://wwwn.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes/ResponseRates.aspx. Accessed July 7, 2017.
  • 9.National Center for Health Statistics, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) NHANES Data Documentation, Codebook, and Frequencies: Prescription Medications. CDC website. https://wwwn.cdc.gov/Nchs/Nhanes/2013-2014/RXQ_RX_H.htm. Published December 2016. Accessed July 7, 2017.
  • 10.Tran AR, Zito JM, Safer DJ, Hundley SD. National trends in pediatric use of anticonvulsants. Psychiatr Serv. 2012;63(11):1095-1101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Visser SN, Danielson ML, Bitsko RH, et al. . Trends in the parent-report of health care provider-diagnosed and medicated attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: United States, 2003-2011. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2014;53(1):34-46. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.National Center for Health Statistics, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey: Questionnaires, Datasets, and Related Documentation. CDC website. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes/nhanes_questionnaires.htm. Updated October 30, 2015. Accessed July 14, 2017.
  • 13.National Center for Health Statistics, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) NHANES 1988-2014 Data Documentation: Prescription Medications—Drug Information. CDC website. https://wwwn.cdc.gov/Nchs/Nhanes/1999-2000/RXQ_DRUG.htm. Revised December 2016. Accessed July 7, 2017.
  • 14.Kit BK, Simon AE, Ogden CL, Akinbami LJ. Trends in preventive asthma medication use among children and adolescents, 1988-2008. Pediatrics. 2012;129(1):62-69. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Jonas BS, Gu Q, Albertorio-Diaz JR. Psychotropic medication use among adolescents: United States, 2005-2010. NCHS Data Brief. 2013;(135):1-8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Be Antibiotics Aware: Smart Use, Best Care. CDC website. https://www.cdc.gov/antibiotic-use/. Published 2017. Accessed October 19, 2017.
  • 17.National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) Expert Panel Report 3: Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Asthma. NHLBI website. https://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/files/docs/guidelines/asthgdln.pdf. Published 2007. Accessed June 27, 2017.
  • 18.Wolraich M, Brown L, Brown RT, et al. ; Subcommittee on Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder; Steering Committee on Quality Improvement and Management . ADHD: clinical practice guideline for the diagnosis, evaluation, and treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in children and adolescents. Pediatrics. 2011;128(5):1007-1022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Expert Panel on Integrated Guidelines for Cardiovascular Health and Risk Reduction in Children and Adolescents; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute . Expert panel on integrated guidelines for cardiovascular health and risk reduction in children and adolescents: summary report. Pediatrics. 2011;128(suppl 5):S213-S256. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) CDC Guideline for Prescribing Opioids for Chronic Pain—United States, 2016. CDC website. https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/65/rr/rr6501e1.htm. Published 2016. Accessed June 27, 2017.
  • 21.Dowell D, Haegerich TM, Chou R. CDC guideline for prescribing opioids for chronic pain—United States, 2016. JAMA. 2016;315(15):1624-1645. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Korn EL, Graubard BI. Confidence intervals for proportions with small expected number of positive counts estimated from survey data. Surv Methodol. 1998;24(2):193-201. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing [computer program]. Vienna, Austria: R Project for Statistical Computing; 2017.
  • 24.Survey: analysis of complex survey samples. R package version 3.32 [computer program]. Vienna, Austria: R Project for Statistical Computing; 2017.
  • 25.Frenk SM, Kit BK, Lukacs SL, Hicks LA, Gu Q. Trends in the use of prescription antibiotics: NHANES 1999-2012. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2016;71(1):251-256. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Chai G, Governale L, McMahon AW, Trinidad JP, Staffa J, Murphy D. Trends of outpatient prescription drug utilization in US children, 2002-2010. Pediatrics. 2012;130(1):23-31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Vaz LE, Kleinman KP, Raebel MA, et al. . Recent trends in outpatient antibiotic use in children. Pediatrics. 2014;133(3):375-385. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Antibiotic use in the United States, 2017: progress and opportunities. CDC website. https://www.cdc.gov/antibiotic-use/stewardship-report/index.html. Published 2017. Accessed April 12, 2018.
  • 29.Olfson M, Blanco C, Liu SM, Wang S, Correll CU. National trends in the office-based treatment of children, adolescents, and adults with antipsychotics. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2012;69(12):1247-1256. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Olfson M, King M, Schoenbaum M. Treatment of young people with antipsychotic medications in the United States. JAMA Psychiatry. 2015;72(9):867-874. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Akinbami LJ, Simon AE, Rossen LM. Changing trends in asthma prevalence among children [published online December 28, 2015]. Pediatrics. doi: 10.1542/peds.2015-2354 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Sharfstein JM, North M, Serwint JR. Over the counter but no longer under the radar—pediatric cough and cold medications. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(23):2321-2324. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Kantor ED, Rehm CD, Haas JS, Chan AT, Giovannucci EL. Trends in prescription drug use among adults in the United States from 1999-2012. JAMA. 2015;314(17):1818-1831. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.National Center for Health Statistics Health, United States 2016. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics; 2017. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplement.

eTable. Classification of Prescription Medications Reported by NHANES Participants Aged 0-19 Years From 1999-2000 to 2013-2014 by Therapeutic Class


Articles from JAMA are provided here courtesy of American Medical Association

RESOURCES