Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Jun 19.
Published in final edited form as: Proc Meet Acoust. 2017 Dec 18;32(1):020013. doi: 10.1121/2.0000746

Reconstruction of nonlinear ultrasound field of an annular therapeutic array from acoustic holograms of its individual elements

Vera A Khokhlova 1, Petr Yuldashev 2, Pavel Rosnitskiy 3, Oleg Sapozhnikov 4, Erik Dumont 5, Martijn Hoogenboom 6, Martijn den Brok 7, Jurgen Fütterer 8, Gosse Adema 9
PMCID: PMC6583799  NIHMSID: NIHMS1028406  PMID: 31217834

Abstract

Acoustic holography method has been shown to provide accurate reconstruction of 3D ultrasound fields generated by various medical transducers including multi-element arrays as well as to set a boundary condition for nonlinear field modeling at high pressure levels. Here an approach of measuring holograms of individual array elements for modeling of an entire array field is proposed and tested for a 3 MHz 16-element annular array (48 mm diameter and 35 mm radius of curvature). The array is a part of a high intensity focused ultrasound system with magnetic resonance guidance used for developing thermal and mechanical methods of tissue ablation in mouse tumors. The holograms measured separately for each array element were combined together to obtain a boundary condition for the array with all operating elements. Modeling results were compared to low-amplitude beam scans and good agreement was demonstrated. Then, nonlinear field simulations were performed at increasing power outputs based on the 3D Westervelt equation. It was shown that the transducer is capable to produce focal waveforms with 140 MPa shock amplitude at 110 W acoustic power and thus is well suited for evaluating shock-based ablation therapies in small animals.

1. INTRODUCTION

Acoustic holography method has been shown to provide accurate reconstruction of 3D ultrasound fields generated by various medical transducers including multi-element arrays.1 However, multiple holograms should be acquired for reconstructing various focusing configurations of array fields when electronic phasing is applied to the array elements which can be unpractical. Here an approach of measuring holograms of individual array elements for modeling of an entire array field is presented and tested for a 3 MHz annular array (Fig. 1a,b).

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

A photograph (a) and sketch (b) of the array and a diagram of the holography measurements (c).

The array (16 elements, 48 mm diameter, and 35 mm radius of curvature) is a part of a high intensity focused ultrasound system with magnetic resonance guidance (Image Guided Therapy, Pessac, France) used for evaluation of thermal and mechanical ablation methods in mouse tumors.2,3 The holograms measured separately for each array element were combined together to obtain a boundary condition for the array with all operating elements and simulate its linear 3D field. The results were compared to simulations when the hologram of the entire array was used as a boundary condition and to low-output experimental field scans.

At high power outputs, measurements of nonlinear acoustic field generated by such high-frequency strongly focused transducer was technically challenging because of its high frequency, fine spatial structure of the field, small dimensions of the focal lobe, and limited hydrophone bandwidth. Here, an approach that combines measurements and modeling was used. Nonlinear field simulations based on the 3D Westervelt equation with holographic boundary condition were performed at increasing power outputs to determine shock-forming conditions and acoustic pressure levels for the system.4,5

2. MATERIALS AND METHODS

A. ACOUSTIC HOLOGRAPHY MEASUREMENTS

2D measurements of acoustic pulses were conducted with a needle hydrophone (0.2 mm active size, Precision Acoustics, Ltd., UK) in the plane xy perpendicular to the array axis and located at the distance z = 15.2 mm from its center (Fig. 1c). Pressure waveforms were measured at each point of the 250×250 mm square with the increment of 0.2 mm; pulse duration at each scanning point was 100 μs. Sixteen individual holograms from each array element operating with the same phase as well as the hologram of the entire array with all operating elements were acquired at low power output of the system.

Pressure magnitude and phase then were determined from the acoustic waveform at each scanning point. Spatial spectrum of the field was calculated by performing a 2D spatial Fourier transform and the angular spectrum approach was used for setting two boundary conditions in a plane z = 0 by back-propagating numerically the pressure fields from the scanning plane.4,5 Either holography measurements of the entire array or holograms measured separately for each element and combined together were used in these low-power output simulations.1

To test the differences in operating the array elements either separately or all together, which may be caused by the electronics of the system, the boundary conditions were compared. Then linear simulations of the pressure field were performed at the array axis and in the focal plane for both cases and validated by the corresponding linear scan measurements.

B. MEASUREMENT-BASED MODELING OF NONLINEAR ARRAY FIELD

Nonlinear field simulations were performed at increasing power outputs of the array based on the 3D Westervelt equation. Numerical solutions were obtained using a previously developed algorithm validated for various high power HIFU transducers.4,5 The method of fractional steps with an operator splitting procedure of the second-order accuracy over the propagation distance z was employed. The diffraction operator was calculated for the amplitudes of each harmonic in the waveform spectrum using the angular spectrum method. A Godunov-type shock-capturing scheme was employed for modeling the nonlinear operator. Absorption operator was calculated in the spectral representation using an exact solution for each harmonic. Physical parameters of the propagation medium in simulations were chosen as follows: sound speed - 1485 m/s, nonlinear parameter - 3.5, density 998 kg/m3, and thermoviscous absorption 4.33·106 m2/s. Shock-forming conditions at the focus as well as maximum achievable pressure levels and shock amplitude were determined.

3. RESULTS

Shown in Fig. 2 are distributions of acoustic pressure magnitude (Fig. 2a,b) and phase (Fig. 2c,d) reconstructed in the plane z = 0 from the combined holograms of the individual elements and from the hologram of the entire array (b, d). The distributions are in a good agreement both showing an annular structure of the array and boundaries between four pieces of the composite ceramics from which the array was assembled (Fig. 2a,b). Small differences can be noticed such as finer spatial structure of the pressure magnitude distribution obtained from the combined holograms. Performance of each array element was therefore not exactly the same when operating alone or together with all other elements. However, these differences did not noticeably affect the array field simulated using these distributions as a boundary condition. Validation of the linear simulations results versus measurements is presented in Fig. 3a,b. Modeling results obtained with the two holographic boundary conditions and with nominal parameters of an annular array consisting of ideal rings with nominal parameters are compared to the measurements conducted at low power output on the beam axis (Fig. 3a) and in the focal plane (Fig. 3b). The results agree very well demonstrating the accuracy of the proposed method and that the array performs in accordance to its nominal parameters.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Comparison of boundary conditions for the pressure magnitude (a, b) and phase (c, d) obtained by combining holograms from individual elements (a, c) and from the hologram of the entire array (b, d).

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Pressure magnitude distributions modeled and measured at low power output on the beam axis (a) and in the focal plane (b). Focal waveforms simulated for increasing pressure at the array elements (c).

Focal waveforms simulated based on the Westervelt equation at increasing power level of the array are shown in Fig. 3c. Gradual steepening of the waveform that leads to formation of a high amplitude shock fronts is illustrated. Red dashed curve corresponds to the waveform containing a developed shock, which is a characteristic parameter of the system to be used when planning shock-based therapies. Following the definition introduced recently, the shock front is developed when its lower pressure is located at the zero level.5 The amplitude of the developed shock here is 140 MPa reached at 110 W acoustic power of the array when focusing in water. The dimensions of the focal region defined at this power at −6 dB are 1.7 and 0.3 mm for the peak positive and 2.6 and 0.6 mm for the peak negative pressure. According to the nonlinear derating approach, for in situ conditions when focusing at specific depths in tissue, the developed shock will form at the array power increased to compensate attenuation losses on the way to the focus.6

4. CONCLUSION

An approach of measuring acoustic holograms of individual array elements for modeling an entire array field at low and high power outputs is presented and tested for a 3 MHz 16-element highly focused annular array (48 mm diameter and 35 mm radius of curvature) of a preclinical MRgHIFU system. A boundary condition for modeling the array field was set from the holograms obtained either separately for each array element and then combined together or with all operating elements. Good agreement was demonstrated between the linear modeling results of the array field and experimental low-amplitude beam scans. Further studies are planned to evaluate the accuracy of the approach when additional phases are applied to the array for electronic steering of the focus along its axis.

Nonlinear simulations based on the 3D Westervelt equation showed that the transducer is capable to produce focal waveforms with 140 MPa shock amplitude at 110 W acoustic power and thus is well suited for evaluating shock-based ablation therapies in small animals.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

Work supported by Radboudumc PhD grant, NIH RO1EB007643, and RSF 14-12-00974.

Contributor Information

Vera A. Khokhlova, M.V. Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, 119991, RUSSIAN FEDERATION

Petr Yuldashev, M.V. Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, 119991, RUSSIAN FEDERATION.

Pavel Rosnitskiy, M.V. Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, 119991, RUSSIAN FEDERATION.

Oleg Sapozhnikov, M.V. Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, 119991, RUSSIAN FEDERATION.

Erik Dumont, Image Guided Therapy, Pessac, FRANCE.

Martijn Hoogenboom, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, NETHERLANDS.

Martijn den Brok, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, NETHERLANDS.

Jurgen Fütterer, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, NETHERLANDS.

Gosse Adema, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, NETHERLANDS.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Sapozhnikov OA, Tsysar SA, Khokhlova VA, Kreider W, “Acoustic holography as a metrological tool for characterizing medical ultrasound sources and fields,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 138(3), 1515–1532 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Hoogenboom M, van Amerongen MJ, Eikelenboom DC, Wassink M, den Brok MH, Hulsbergen-van de Kaa C, Dumont E, Adema GJ, Heerschap A, Fütterer JJ, “Development of a high-field MR-guided HIFU setup for thermal and mechanical ablation methods in small animals,” Journal of Therapeutic Ultrasound 3(1), 14 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Hoogenboom M, Eikelenboom D, den Brok MH, Veltien A, Wassink M, Wesseling P, Dumont E, Fütterer JJ, Adema GJ, Heerschap A, “In vivo MR guided boiling histotripsy in a mouse tumor model evaluated by MRI and histopathology,” NMR in Biomedicine 29(6), 721–731 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Kreider W, Yuldashev PV, Sapozhnikov OA, Farr N, Partanen A, Bailey MR, and Khokhlova VA, “Characterization of a multi-element clinical HIFU system using acoustic holography and nonlinear modeling,” IEEE Trans. Ultrason., Ferroelect., Freq. Contr. 60(8), 1683–1698 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Rosnitskiy PB, Yuldashev PV, Sapozhnikov OA, Maxwell A, Kreider W, Bailey MR, Khokhlova VA, “Design of HIFU transducers for generating specified nonlinear ultrasound fields,” IEEE Trans. Ultrason., Ferroelect., Freq. Contr. 64(2), 374–390 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Bessonova OV, Khokhlova VA, Canney MS, Bailey MR, Crum LA, “A derating method for therapeutic applications of high intensity focused ultrasound,” Acoust. Phys. 56(3), 376–385 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES