Abstract
Replication stalling has been associated with the formation of pathological mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) rearrangements. Yet, almost nothing is known about the fate of stalled replication intermediates in mitochondria. We show here that replication stalling in mitochondria leads to replication fork regression and mtDNA double-strand breaks. The resulting mtDNA fragments are normally degraded by a mechanism involving the mitochondrial exonuclease MGME1, and the loss of this enzyme results in accumulation of linear and recombining mtDNA species. Additionally, replication stress promotes the initiation of alternative replication origins as an apparent means of rescue by fork convergence. Besides demonstrating an interplay between two major mechanisms rescuing stalled replication forks – mtDNA degradation and homology-dependent repair – our data provide evidence that mitochondria employ similar mechanisms to cope with replication stress as known from other genetic systems.
Subject terms: Stalled forks, DNA damage and repair, DNA recombination
Introduction
DNA replication is an inherently complex cellular event, where any fault in the processes can have dire consequences for the cell. In contrast to test tube conditions, DNA synthesis in a cell is not just a polymerization reaction with standard kinetic properties. Instead, replication forks stall frequently as the replisome encounters template damage, transcription complexes, positive superhelical torsion and protein-DNA complexes1,2. If replication fork arrest is not relieved in a controlled manner, the condition will eventually result in a double-strand break and the loss of the non-replicated part of the genome in the absence of repair. Consequently, both prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells have evolved a vast arsenal of tools and strategies to remove the various obstacles blocking replisome progression as well as to deal with the DNA damage caused by replication failure.
Compared to nuclear genomes, the mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) is tiny, 16–19 kb in most metazoans, and exists in hundreds to thousands of copies per cell3. For a long time it has been thought that mitochondria lack most of the DNA repair pathways existing in the nucleus, therefore preferring mtDNA maintenance quantity over quality, and damaged molecules would be targeted for degradation rather than investing in their repair4. While the latter could be true for post-mitotic or ephemeral cells in some organisms5, exhaustive mutation pattern analyses from mouse have concluded that replication errors – not damage – are the main sources of mtDNA mutations6,7. Similar to nuclear replication forks, mtDNA replication arrests at sites of template damage8,9, on naturally occurring replication pause sites controlling transcription complex bypass10,11 or due impaired enzyme function caused by pathological mutations in the replicative helicase TWNK or mitochondrial DNA polymerase Pol γ12–14. Double-strand breaks resulting from replication stress have been suggested to be the main culprits behind the pathological mtDNA rearrangements observed in many human conditions15,16.
In contrast to nuclear genome replication, mtDNA replication in mammals is mostly strand-asynchronous, with the lagging strand synthetized with a considerable delay compared to the leading strand17,18. Replication of the leading strand (heavy or H-strand, due to its higher G to C ratio) initiates at one major origin (OH), resulting in a displaced single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) intermediate, protected by mtSSB18 and/or active hybridization with preformed RNA19. Compared to the H-strand, the initiation of the lagging strand (light or L-strand) is considerably more flexible. The major L-strand origin (OL)16,20 is complemented by more-or-less frequent lagging strand initiation at undefined sites21,22. The uncoupled leading and lagging strand synthesis means that potential template damage has very different consequences for the synthesis of the two strands. Both in prokaryotes and in the eukaryotic nucleus, damage in the lagging strand template does not significantly hamper replication progression1,2, as expected from the discontinuous nature of its DNA synthesis – new Okazaki-fragments are constantly primed independently from the preceding ones. If the replisome stalls at a damaged site during leading strand synthesis, a dedicated translesion polymerase can be recruited to the replication fork to synthesize across the damage1. Alternatively, replication of the two strands can be uncoupled with the replicative helicase continuing to unwind while the lagging strand is synthetized. This will result in lesion skipping by upstream priming or fork regression and reset by origin-independent restart1,2. Both, regressed forks as well as broken, partially replicated molecules resulting from the cleavage of stalled replication fork, can be repaired by recombination-dependent replication23.
We have previously shown that the archaic primase-polymerase PrimPol is required for lesion skipping and promiscuous lagging strand priming in mammalian mitochondria22. The involvement of PrimPol in lagging strand priming is highly interesting as it helps to understand some aspects of basic mtDNA maintenance mechanisms, such as the occurrence of fully double-strand DNA (dsDNA) mtDNA replication intermediates that have been previously associated with strand-coupled replication24–26. While it is impossible to differentiate between frequent lagging strand priming and true strand-coupled replication, this might not be mechanistically important. Recent insight into the genome replication of bacteria has demonstrated that DNA replication is often dynamic, with frequent uncoupling and recoupling of leading and lagging strand synthesis27. In essence, replication coupling is mechanistically arbitrary, as fully dsDNA mtDNA replication intermediates can arise when L-strand synthesis catches up with the H-strand synthesis.
Regardless of their origin, fully dsDNA (i. e. RNaseH and ssDNA cleaving enzyme resistant) replication intermediates of mtDNA exist in all tissues, being predominant in metabolically active post-mitotic tissues28,29. Interestingly, mtDNA damage in rapidly dividing cultured cells results in dramatic accumulation of partially ssDNA replication intermediates, but also increases the abundance of fully dsDNA intermediates8. In the presented study, we reveal that these fully dsDNA replication forks can regress upon replication stalling. Although fork regression-dependent replication rescue has been well characterized in other systems30–32, our results are the first demonstration of this mechanism occurring in mitochondria, revealing biologically relevant differences between dsDNA and ssDNA replication intermediates. Furthermore, we are able to demonstrate that mitochondria have additional genome safeguarding mechanisms, such as the ability to initiate replication twice on the same template to converge replication forks. Important for human pathological conditions, our data also show that the stalled forks frequently break, resulting in linear fragments that contribute to the formation of mtDNA recombination intermediates unless degraded by an MGME1-dependent pathway.
Results
We have previously reported that UV and oxidative damage as well as inhibition of mitochondrial DNA polymerase Pol γ by ddC result in an increase in dsDNA intermediates concomitantly with the appearance of cruciform (x-form) mtDNA8. To distinguish these x-forms from resembling replication termination intermediates with two meeting replication forks that occur at the non-coding region (NCR) of mtDNA33, we focused on a region spanning nts 12,273–16,012 of mtDNA, generated by DraI restriction (Fig. 1A). The NCR, including the main leading strand origin (OH) and the site of termination, lies outside of this fragment and any strand-asynchronous replication entering the fragment will give rise to so-called slow moving y-arc intermediates (smy) due to the inability of DraI to cleave the displaced ssDNA strand (Fig. 1A,B). Fully dsDNA replication intermediates in contrast are cleaved by DraI to generate y-forms (y). Replication initiating within the analyzed fragment will give rise to replication bubbles (b). All cruciform DNA will be double-stranded and consist of recombination junctions with equally long arms (x) or trident-shaped DNA (rx), the latter generated by regression of the replication fork. Both x-forms can be enhanced by UV treatment (Fig. 1C, Supplementary Fig. S2) and are resistant to the single-stranded DNA-digesting S1 nuclease, which also removes the RNA:DNA hybrid containing intermediates34. Regressed forks and recombination junctions identical to these x-forms are known to accumulate during replication stalling also in other genomes30–32. Note also the relative increase in the dsDNA y-forms and the appearance of replication bubbles (b) after UV exposure (Fig. 1C, Supplementary Fig. S2).
Homology-dependent rescue of broken and reversed forks in prokaryotes as well as the eukaryotic nucleus requires the action of a recombinase1,2. Although no dedicated recombinases have been reported from mammalian mitochondria, the replicative helicase TWNK has substantial strand-exchange activity in vitro and is involved in x-form mtDNA induction in a transgenic animal model29,35 as well as in the human heart36. Overexpression of TWNK in cells under normal culture conditions results in an increase of dsDNA replication intermediates (y) and reduced levels of all x-forms (Supplementary Fig. S3A). Remarkably, TWNK overexpression almost completely prevents fork regression following UV exposure (no rx). As knockout of TWNK results in loss of mtDNA, we decided to use cells expressing the dominant-negative TWNK-LD mutation to see if fork regression and recombination junction formation are dependent on the helicase activity. TWNK-LD represents a clinically relevant patient mutation with a 13 aa duplication in the so-called linker region (352–364), resulting in severe impairment of the helicase activity, mtDNA replication stalling and depletion of copy number12. Interestingly, expression of the mutant TWNK did not prevent the formation of either x-form, but dramatically increased the amount of bubble structures (b) (Supplementary Fig. S3B).
The mitochondrial DNA exonuclease MGME1 has been shown to be involved in the turnover of linear mtDNA37. Therefore, we aimed to address its role in the processing of stalled dsDNA replication intermediates, which can generate double-strand breaks when broken. Overexpression of MGME1 in HEK293cells increased the abundance of dsDNA replication intermediates (y) at the expense of strand-displacement intermediates (smy) and reduced levels of all x-forms, similar to TWNK overexpression. MGME1 overexpression also strongly reduced the UV-induced formation of cruciform (x and rx) mtDNA species (Fig. 1D). The knockout (KO) of MGME1 had high basal levels of regressed forks and recombination junctions compared to controls. Upon UV treatment the knockout cells showed a clear increase of mtDNA x-forms, but still showed a strong shift towards dsDNA (y) mitochondrial replication intermediates (Fig. 1D). While MGME1 overexpression and knockout as well as TWNK overexpression prevented replication initiation within the studied fragment, none of the manipulations influenced the UV-dependent increase in smy-forms upon UV exposure as reported for PrimPol22.
As MGME1 KO cells showed the most prominent recombination intermediates (x-forms) we have ever observed in cultured cells, we hypothesized these to be linked with the high levels of linear mtDNA forms that appear as a consequence of MGME1 loss37–40. These 11 kb subgenomic linear fragments map rather precisely to the region between between OH and OL40 and are similar to the ones observed in mice expressing exonuclease-deficient Pol γ (the so-called mutator mice)41. The OH–OL fragments have been suggested to originate from replication fork breakage at a nick left of the replication origin due to a ligation defect caused by incomplete processing of flap structures at these loci42. The persistence of these subgenomic linear forms both in the mutator mouse as well as in the MGME1 knockout is explained by the fact that both the 5´-exonuclease activity of MGME1 and the 3´-exonuclease activity of Pol γ are required for the turnover of broken mtDNA37. We reasoned that increased replication stress results in more frequent double-strand breaks, which are enriched in MGME1 knockout cells due their inability to turn over broken molecules. The accumulation of linear mtDNA forces the cells to deploy other means to their disposal, such as recombination-dependent repair, which is detectable by an increase of x-forms.
As expected, the MGME1 KO HEK293 cells had high levels of the linear OH–OL fragment and 7 S DNA (Fig. 2), similar to the MGME1 patients39 and knockout mice38. While the level of the subgenomic fragment did not rise upon mild stalling caused by UV treatment, enforced replication after ddC treatment increased it 40-fold compared to untreated cells (Fig. 2B: +96 h, 4 kb fragment in AflII + HindIII digest). Interestingly, a similar fragment as observed in the MGME1 KO cells also appeared in parental HEK293T cells upon ddC treatment, together with an additional band corresponding to an mtDNA dimer in size (Fig. 2C). Whereas the OH–OL fragment was lost in normal HEK293T cells during the recovery after the ddC treatment, high levels of the fragment remained in MGME1 KO cells.
To see if the MGME1 knockout had any effect on mtDNA topology, we analyzed native undigested mtDNA using 1D- and 2D-AGE (Fig. 3, Supplementary Fig. S4). Again, the most prominent differences between parental HEK293T and knockout cells were observed in the cells recovering from ddC. MGME1 KO cells had high levels of linear mtDNA forms, including a 33 kb species corresponding to dimeric mtDNA in size (Fig. 3C). Additionally, novel “eyebrow” forms (eb in Fig. 3C) were also observed (Fig. 3D). These forms start from the open circular species (oc) and form an arc that is growing in size in the first dimension, thus behaving similarly as replication intermediates. Further analysis of the non-linear forms revealed that in contrast to the control cells showing bubbles and circles, the MGME1 KO cells had mainly y-shaped replicative molecules (Fig. 3E,F), which arise from broken replication forks with one end attached to OH or OL (Supplementary Fig. S5). Although the MGME1 knockout had a relatively small (25% reduction) effect on steady-state mtDNA levels under normal conditions, the cells were nearly unable to regain normal mtDNA copy number levels after a ddC treatment (Fig. 4A). Concomitant with the failure to recover mtDNA copy number, MGME1 knockout cells were unable to increase replication initiation from OH in a similar manner as the wild type cells, as seen by the absence of a bubble arc in the observed fragment (Supplementary Fig. S6). In addition, replication initiation from alternative origins as a response to stalling was abolished in MGME1 KO cells (Fig. 4B,C), as also seen after UV treatment (Fig. 1D).
2D-AGE is a powerful tool to achieve a snapshot of all molecular forms present in a sample, but is dependent on the correct interpretation of the observed patterns. To consolidate our findings, we analyzed the mtDNA from untreated and 72 h ddC treated wild type HEK293T as well as MGME1 knockout cells using transmission electron microscopy (Table 1). As expected, forced replication during recovery after ddC treatment caused a marked increase in replicative forms resulting from replication stalling, with a much stronger influence on MGME1 knockout cells (8% vs. 19% replicative forms, Table 1). The majority of these molecules were broken at one end of the replication bubble (Supplementary Fig. S7), as already evident in the 2D-AGE analysis (Fig. 3C–F, Supplementary Fig. S5). Although these molecules might have been broken during sample preparation, it is highly unlikely that the breakage would mainly affect the MGME1 KO cells (compare also the difference in the linear arc between control and knockouts in Fig. 3C). Concomitant with our observations using 2D-AGE, the MGME1 KO cells also had higher levels of complex mtDNA forms containing two or more molecules (Fig. 5A, Supplementary Fig. S8), representing either recombining or catenated DNA, which also increased under ddC treatment (Table 1, Supplementary Fig. S4). Although linear mtDNA fragments are impossible to differentiate from contaminating nuclear DNA, we observed linear molecules corresponding to the size of dimeric mtDNA complexed with circular molecules in ddC treated MGME1 knockout cells (Fig. 5B, see also Fig. 3C) as well as cruciform molecules (Fig. 5C). Other odd molecules observed from MGME1 KO cells included several circular forms of about 6 kb in size (Supplementary Fig. S8). Interestingly, in parental HEK293T cells ddC treatment induced a specific molecular class with two replication events in one molecule (Fig. 6), likely corresponding to the observed increase in non-conventional replication bubbles under replicative stress (Figs 1, 4, Supplementary Figs S2 and 3).
Table 1.
HEK untreated | HEK ddC | MGME1 KO untreated | MGME1 KO ddC | |
---|---|---|---|---|
N | 400 | 400 | 400 | 100 |
Catenated or recombining | 9% | 15% | 11% | 29% |
Dimeric circles | 0.1% | 0.2% | 1.3% | ND |
Replicating | 5% | 8% | 5% | 19% |
of which broken | 10% | 40% | 57% | 32% |
N = number of counted molecules. Note that catenated and recombining circles cannot be distinguished from the TEM imagery. Only 100 molecules were counted from the ddC treated MGME1 KO due to high levels of linear mtDNA in these samples and therefore rare dimeric molecules were not detected (ND).
Discussion
Replication stress or global impairment of DNA replication2 results in the transient slowing down or stalling of replication forks. In mitochondria, this has been suggested to be a major contributor for pathological mtDNA rearrangements12,15,16,43. Perturbations in replication processes have an obvious impact on mitochondrial genome maintenance, especially due to the mainly strand-asynchronous manner of mtDNA synthesis17. Damage on the leading strand template will stall the DNA polymerase9, resulting in the accumulation of strand-asynchronous replication intermediates (smy, Figs 1 and 7A)8. If leading strand stalling persists or also the helicase progression is halted12,13,34, lagging strand synthesis can catch up with the replication fork (Fig. 7B), converting mtDNA strand-asynchronous replication intermediates to fully duplex DNA intermediates. If the replication block only affects the DNA polymerase, the replicative helicase can continue to unwind the DNA duplex beyond the lesion, allowing the by-pass by a re-priming event (Fig. 7C)22.
If the replicative helicase (Supplementary Fig. S3)12,13 or the synthesis of both strands is stalled, as in the case of ddC treatment (Figs 2–4), re-start is no longer an option. In the nucleus such stalled forks can be rescued by converging forks from replication origins nearby (Fig. 7D), where a subset of replication origins are activated only during replication stress conditions44. Interestingly, also in mitochondria replication stress results in the appearance of replication bubbles outside of the canonical replication origins (b in e.g. Figs 1, 4 and 7B, Supplementary Figs S2 and 3)8 and in mtDNA molecules having two replication events (Fig. 6). As replication stress seems to specifically cause replication initiation outside of NCR, mitochondrial must possess mechanisms to license and prime alternative replication origins, which enable the completion of replication if the stalled fork cannot be resolved by other means. In bacterial systems, replication initiation outside of the canonical origins is primarily controlled by a RecBCD complex -mediated strand-invasion event45. As MGME1 is a RecB-type exonuclease39 and the loss of MGME1 activity abolishes stress-induced replication initiation (Figs 1D and 4D), existence of similar mechanisms in mitochondria should be investigated. This type of mechanism would also have considerable flexibility as it would not be dependent on the existence of specific origin sequences. Interestingly, the first step of the RecBCD -dependent replication initiation is the formation of a displacement loop (D-loop)46, a prominent but enigmatic feature of also mammalian mtDNA, that is modified in MGME1-deficient cells40.
Our observations on stress-induced replication could also explain the biological significance of replication initiation outside of the canonical origins, which have been known for over a decade24,26,47, but whose significance has been heavily disputed16,21,48. In contrast to replication initiating at OH, replication from the stress-induced origins is bidirectional and strand-coupled, as evident from the S1 nuclease-resistant bubble arcs that span the entire restriction fragment length in 2D-AGE analysis (Figs 1, 4 and 7B, Supplementary Figs S2 and 3). As pointed out before, this type of replication can be confused with frequent lagging-strand priming49, which also occurs under stress conditions22. Due to this similarity, separation of the two mechanisms is technically challenging. Similarly, nothing is known about the replication origin licensing or initiation in mitochondria and the experimental interrogation of the different origins is currently impossible. The fact that overexpression of TWNK can effectively repress this alternative origin initiation in mitochondria (Supplementary Fig. S3A) could simply indicate that excess helicase availability can forcibly push the stalled fork forward, allowing re-priming to take place.
If a stalled fork is fully duplex DNA, as expected once the lagging strand synthesis has caught up with the leading strand, the fork can be rescued by a mechanism involving fork regression and restart1,2. Fork regression results in a four-way junction – chicken foot – where the newly synthetized strands are annealed at the free end (Fig. 7E: ii). On 2D-AGE these structures migrate as typical spikes or cones originating from the y-arc31,32, and these spikes/features (rx) appear also in mtDNA after damage (Figs 1, 4 and 7D). As of note, x-forms are sensitive to branch migration and more likely lost than generated as an artefact during the DNA extraction (Supplementary Fig. S9). In the nucleus, the RAD51 recombinase is required for the first step of fork regression50, while bacterial systems use helicases such as RuvAB and RecG51.
TWNK helicase has been shown to possess strand-exchange activity in vitro52,53 and to be able to induce mtDNA recombination in vivo35. Interestingly, TWNK overexpression reduced the regressed forks (rx) and recombination junctions (x) during replication stalling (Supplementary Fig. S3A). This is in contrast to the effects in some solid tissues, where x-forms are specifically induced by TWNK overexpression29,35. It should be noted that this phenotype in transgenic mice is restricted only to tissues having mainly dsDNA mtDNA replication intermediates such as skeletal muscle and heart, indicating a fundamental difference in the mtDNA maintenance strategies in different tissues28. The effect observed in cultured cells is quite likely due to a more efficient lesion bypass instead of initiation of alternative origins (note the lack of b in Supplementary Fig. S3A). Alternatively, excess TWNK might increase the turnover of the regressed forks. In fact, TWNK has been shown to possess potent 5′ to 3′ DNA branch migration activity54, which might be required for the turnover of the rx-forms. In contrast, the expression of the catalytically impaired dominant-negative TWNK-LD did not suppress the appearance of the regressed forks, and the cells maintained replication initiation from alternative origins (Supplementary Fig. S3A). The experiment demonstrates that the helicase activity of TWNK is not required for fork regression (rx-arc), formation of recombination junctions (x-arc) or replication initiation from alternative origins.
In the nucleus, fork rescue continues with the repair and restart of the stalled fork by a homologous recombination-mediated mechanism1,2 (Fig. 7E). Fork regression will initially enable the nascent lagging strand to be used as a template to continue the leading strand synthesis, resulting in a chicken foot structure that stabilizes the stalled fork (Fig. 7E: i – ii). If the cell is unable to repair the damage on the leading strand template, the 5´-end at the chicken foot structure is enzymatically degraded, resulting in a free 3´-end that can strand invade upstream of the lesion (Fig. 7E: iii vs. iv). The initial strand-invasion event will eventually form true Holliday-junctions (x-forms) after the replication has finished (Fig. 7E: v). As of note, the required strand-invasion step is in principle identical to the replication template switching observed to occur upon double-strand breaks in human mitochondria and highly similar to the replication-dependent break repair seen in T7 phage16. In T7 phage, the gp2.5 single-strand DNA binding protein is responsible for the strand-invasion step55, whereas in mammalian mitochondria this reaction might be catalyzed by TWNK52,53, independently of its helicase activity. Molecular recombination is also the main rescue mechanism of broken replication intermediates and an important genome maintenance mechanism from bacteria to vertebrates56 (Fig. 7F).
The accumulation of linear subgenomic fragments, corresponding to broken replication intermediates, in patients with an MGME1 loss-of-function mutation39,40 or knockout mice38 are likely a consequence of two independent events. They are probably generated by defective ligation of nascent strands at the origin due to faulty processing of DNA flap structures42 and then accumulate due to the inability of MGME1-deficient cells to degrade linear mtDNA fragments37. We show these molecules to arise from site-specific stalling and breakage at either one of the main replication origins (Supplementary Fig. S5), resulting in tailed intermediates (Fig. 3D–F, Supplementary Fig. S7) that eventually break to form the linear 11 kb fragment.
The fact that MGME1 overexpression resulted in a decrease of all x-forms after mtDNA damage (Figs 1D and 3–5) could be linked to an increased turnover of linear mtDNA. The free end of a regressed fork is essentially a double-strand break and its rapid turnover in MGME1 overexpressor cells might result in a repair defect, which could explain the delayed recovery from ddC treatment (Fig. 4A). Conversely, impairment of linear DNA disposal in the MGME1 knockout cells increases the x-forms (Figs 1D, 4 and 5, Supplementary Fig. S4, Table 1), likely indicating an active double-strand break repair. This observation suggests that cells primarily try to discard broken mtDNA, but if this does not work, homology dependent repair is used as a reserve mechanism. The importance of the two mechanisms likely varies between cell types, explaining the abundance of x-forms in some tissues but not in others28,29. As of note, even untreated MGME1 KO cells have a specific class of dimeric molecules, which are sensitive to the cruciform-cutting endonuclease T7gp3, but not to the decatenating Topoisomerase IV enzyme (Supplementary Figs S4 and S9). Interestingly, both T7gp3 as well as S1 nuclease can convert more complex MGME1 KO mtDNA forms into a 33 kb linear species, further demonstrating that these genomic dimers are generated by recombination in mitochondria, as previously suggested for the human heart mtDNA forms29,35.
While it is impossible to pinpoint to which extent these recombining forms arise from fork rescue (Fig. 7E) or double-strand break repair (Fig. 7F), it is reasonable to assume that both mechanisms work in mitochondria. First, replication stalling per se results in fork regression and x-formation in UV treated cells (Fig. 1) without increasing the levels of the OH–OL fragment (Fig. 2B). Secondly, MGME1 KO cells have high basal levels of x-forms (Fig. 1D), correlating with linear fragments (Fig. 2), dimeric mtDNA (Fig. 3C) and junctional molecules (Fig. 5), all consistent with double-strand break repair by recombination. The dimeric mtDNA forms are mostly head-to-tail dimers, as their cleavage with a single-cut restriction enzyme results in 16.6 kb linears (Fig. 3C vs. 3F). Similar rearrangements, including unicircular dimers to pentamers and strand-invasion intermediates, have been reported from cells expressing catalytically impaired TWNK helicase43, suggesting a common mechanism for their formation through replication stalling-induced double-strand breaks.
The fact that the OH–OL fragment appears transiently also in control cells as a result of replication stalling or when mtDNA replication is boosted to recover the copy number (Fig. 2), is interesting. First, the type and persistence of the damage seems to be important. Although UV treatment causes a distinct replication stalling phenotype, it does not influence mtDNA copy number (Supplementary Fig. S10) or the abundance of the OH–OL fragment (Fig. 2B), probably due to the transient nature of the replication stalling compared to the ddC treatment, which leaves blocked 3′-ends that require an exonuclease for repair. Secondly, the increase in the sub-genomic fragment during mtDNA copy number recovery after ddC treatment demonstrates that OH and OL are frequent breakpoints also under normal conditions and that even normal mtDNA replication could contribute to double-strand breaks and subsequent deletion formation. In fact, rearrangement hotspots around OH are well known both from mice57,58 and humans40,59, further indicating that this replication origin is an important fragile site on mtDNA. Our experiments might also give cues how mtDNA deletions rise during post-natal development in some tissues. Recovery from ddC-induced mtDNA depletion, characterized by rapid amplification of mtDNA to return to the steady-state copy number25,34, emulates physiological conditions where mtDNA levels increase as a response to mitochondrial biogenesis. A boost in mitochondrial biogenesis, such as during muscle development60, could generate a first generation of pathological deletion mutants, which get clonally expanded over time15. Furthermore, antiretroviral therapy using ddC or other similar nucleotide analogues has been shown to result in expansion of mutant mtDNA forms with deletions spanning between OH and OL61, providing a potential link between replication fork breakage observed in this study and the generation of pathological deletions.
As a conclusion, our study demonstrates that mitochondria show similar responses to replication stress as the nuclear genome, including initiation of alternative replication origins and fork regression. Interestingly, linear mtDNA resulting from breakage of replication intermediates seems to be highly recombinogenic. An efficient MGME1-dependent pathway to dispose broken mtDNA molecules could therefore be a first line of genomic defense against pathological rearrangements. On the other hand, our results also suggest an important, perhaps tissue-specific role for recombination-dependent DNA repair in mitochondria. While the molecular mechanisms to overcome replication stalling are well known from other genetic entities, their elucidation in mitochondria, including the interdependence of x-forms and replication bubbles, remains a challenge for future research.
Methods
An overview of the reagents, cell lines and key equipment used in the study is presented in Supplementary Table S1.
Cell culture, ddC and UV light treatments
HEK293T and HEK MGME1-KO cell lines were cultured in DMEM containing 4.5 g/l glucose, 2 mM L-glutamine, 1 mM sodium pyruvate, 50 μg/ml uridine and 10% fetal bovine serum at 37 °C in a humidified atmosphere with 8.5% CO2 atmosphere. Flp-InTM T-RExTM 293 MGME1 wild type (MGME1 OE)62 and TWNK wild-type (TWNK OE) and linker-duplication (TWNK LD) mutant13 cell lines were cultured similarly, and 5 ng/ml of doxycycline was used to induce transgene expression (Supplementary Fig. S1). After the indicated times, cells were harvested and DNA samples were extracted. To induce mitochondrial DNA replication stalling, cells were treated for 3 days with 200 μM of 2′,3′-dideoxycytidine (ddC) (Sigma-Aldrich)8. For UV damage, cells were exposed on the tissue culture dish with DMEM to a single dose of 30 seconds of 1.34 mJ/cm2 x s UVB (302 nm), using a Benchtop 2UVTM transilluminator 302 nm (UVP) instrument8. UV light doses were controlled using a handheld UV radiometer (MINOLTA, UM-25).
Generation of HEK293T MGME1 KO cell line
MGME1 knockout (KO) HEK293 cells were generated using the Crispr-Cas9 approach, as described previously37. The plasmid vector carrying a single guide RNA (sgRNA) sequence for MGME1 (5′-AGACCATTTGCAGGCAGCTC-3′) and coding for Cas9 were purchased from Origene. HEK293T cells were plated at a density of 104 cells per 96-well and transfected with the plasmid using the GeneJuice transfection reagent (Novagen) on the following day. 48 hours after transfection, cells were resuspended and plated on 96-well plates at 0.5 cells/well concentration. After 2 weeks of growth, cells from single colonies were resuspended in 200 μl medium. Half the volume was transferred to a new well for further growth, while cells from the other half were centrifuged and resuspended in 20 μl lysis buffer (1 mM CaCl2, 3 mM MgCl2, 1 mM EDTA, 1% Triton X-100, 10 mM Tris pH 7.5) containing proteinase K (0.2 mg/mL, Qiagen). Incubation at 65 °C for 10 min was followed by heat inactivation at 95 °C for 15 min. Lysates were directly used for PCR amplification and subsequent genotyping by Sanger sequencing. The obtained MGME1 knockout clone was homozygous for the c.37_41del5 frameshift deletion and carried a 197-bp insertion from the cloning vector on one allele.
Protein isolation and western blotting
To check protein expression of TWNK-WT-myc13, TWNK-LD-myc12 and MGME1-WT-flag62 constructs in the respective cell lines (TWNK OE, TWNK LD and MGME1 OE), cellular proteins were extracted as described28. 30–40 μg of total protein were separated by 8–12% SDS-PAGE and blotted onto nitrocellulose membrane (AmershamTM ProtranTM 0.2 μm, GE Healthcare). Detection of transgenic proteins was performed using anti-flag or anti-myc primary antibodies (Supplementary Table S1), HRP-coupled secondary antibodies and chemiluminescent detection with the BioSpectrum ® 810 imaging System (UVP).
Total DNA extraction, mtDNA topology and mtDNA species determination by Southern blotting
Total cellular DNA was isolated using proteinase K and SDS lysis followed by phenol:chloroform extraction and ethanol precipitation29. DNA pellets were re-suspended overnight at 37 °C in the presence of FastDigest BglII (ThermoFisher), which does not cut mtDNA, and the DNA concentration was determined with a NanoDropTM1000 spectrophotometer. For mtDNA topology analysis, 2 μg of BglII digested total DNA were separated on a 0.4% agarose gel in 1 x TBE at 1.2 V/cm for 16 h. Southern blotting and DNA hybridization were carried out as previously29, using a PCR probe spanning nucleotides 12,992–13,670 (ND5). For mtDNA species (intact mtDNA, 11 kb linear fragment, duplication and 7 S DNA) determination, 2 μg of total DNA were digested with FastDigest AflII and HindIII (ThermoFisher) for 6 hours at 37 °C, and then separated on a 0.8% agarose gel in 1x TAE buffer at 25 volts for at least 16 hours. For the visualization of 7 S DNA, DNA samples were partially denatured for 10 minutes at 65 °C before loading. Southern blotting was performed as before and the blot was probed with a 7 S probe spanning nts 12,992–13,670. Probes were labeled using the Rediprime™ II random prime labeling kit (GE Healthcare) and [α-32P]-dCTP (PerkinElmer; 3,000 Ci/mmol). The autoradiographs were captured on a KODAK storage phosphor screen SO230, detected using Molecular Imager FX (BioRad) and quantified using the associated QuantityOne software.
mtDNA copy number determination by real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR)
mtDNA copynumber per cell was determined from total DNA using duplex Taqman quantitative PCR as described28 on an AriaMx Real-Time system (Agilent Technologies).
Mitochondrial DNA isolation, two-dimensional agarose gel electrophoresis (2D-AGE) and Southern blotting
Mitochondrial DNA was isolated using 20 µg/ml cytochalasin (Sigma-Aldrich) treatment for 30 minutes prior to cell breakage, followed by differential centrifugation and sucrose gradient purification63. The 2D-AGE analysis was performed essentially as in Pohjoismäki et al. 200634. Briefly, 10 μg of mitochondrial nucleic acid were digested according to the manufacturer’s recommendation with FastDigest DraI (Thermo Scientific) and run on a 0.4% agarose gel in 1xTBE until the fragments of interest had migrated 10 cm into the gel. The gel slab was rotated 90° and a 0.95% agarose gel with 0.5 µg/ml ethidium bromide (EtBr) was cast around it. The second dimension was run in the presence of 0.5 µg/mL EtBr until the fragment of interest had migrated ~10 cm. Southern blotting and hybridization were performed as described before using the ND5 probe. Where indicated, partially single-stranded DNA was degraded by adding 50 units of S1 nuclease (Thermo Scientific) to the digested DNA samples and incubated for 5 minutes at room temperature prior loading the samples onto the gel. The long-range PvuII 2D-AGE analysis was performed as in Torregrosa-Muñumer et al.22 Uncut long-range 2D-AGE analysis was performed with 10 µg of undigested total DNA, run as a normal long-range 2D-AGE and probed against ND5. The autoradiographs were exposed either on Kodak MS film (Sigma-Aldrich) or captured on a KODAK storage phosphor screen SO230 and detected using Molecular Imager FX (BioRad).
Transmission electron microscopy (TEM)
Mitochondrial DNA was isolated as for 2D-AGE, treated with 50 units of RNase I (Thermo Scientific) at 37 °C for 30 min, subsequently purified using phenol-chloroform extraction and ethanol precipitation and dissolved in TEM grade TE buffer (10 mm Tris-HCl, 0.1 mm ETDA, pH 7.6). mtDNA preparation was visualized by EM following the Kleinschmidt procedure64,65. Briefly, 25–50 ng of mtDNA were diluted in 50 µl aqueous solution of 250 mM ammonium acetate and 100 µg/µl cytochrome c, mixed gently, and the drop allowed to develop for 15–20 min on parafilm. Cytochrome-coated DNA floating on the drop surface was captured by gently touching the drop with a parlodion-coated copper grid. The grids were rinsed in 70% and 85% EtOH solutions, 20 s. each. Following quick air-drying, the grids were placed in a high vacuum evaporator and a thin layer of platinum (80%): palladium (20%) was evaporated on the sample at an angle of 8 degrees at 2 × 10−6 torr. Finally, the grids were covered with a thin layer of carbon to stabilize the parlodion film. Samples were examined in an FEI T12 TEM equipped with a Gatan 2kx2k Orius CCD camera at 40 kV. Contour lengths of the molecules were measured using Digital Micrograph software. Monomeric mtDNA (16,569 bp) equals about 5,500 nm.
Supplementary information
Acknowledgements
Ms. Smaranda Willcox, Chapel Hill, NC, U.S.A., is thanked for her valuable support of the TEM analyses and excellent suggestions to improve our manuscript. The MGME1 overexpression construct was a kind gift from Dr. Michal Minczuk, Cambridge, UK. JLOP wishes to thank the Jane and Aatos Erkko Foundation for their open-minded and generous support of our work. This work was supported by grants of the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (KU 911/21-2 to WSK and ZS 99/3-2 to GZ).
Author Contributions
J.L.O.P. and S.G. conceived and designed the experiments, supervised the experiments and wrote the manuscript. RT-M performed the majority of the experiments, A.H. and J.D.G. conducted the TEM experiments and contributed to the writing of the manuscript. D.B., G.Z. and W.K. generated and characterized the MGME1 knockout cells as well as participated in the manuscript writing.
Competing Interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Supplementary information accompanies this paper at 10.1038/s41598-019-45244-6.
References
- 1.Marians Kenneth J. Lesion Bypass and the Reactivation of Stalled Replication Forks. Annual Review of Biochemistry. 2018;87(1):217–238. doi: 10.1146/annurev-biochem-062917-011921. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Pasero P, Vindigni A. Nucleases Acting at Stalled Forks: How to Reboot the Replication Program with a Few Shortcuts. Annual review of genetics. 2017;51:477–499. doi: 10.1146/annurev-genet-120116-024745. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Pohjoismaki JL, Goffart S. Of circles, forks and humanity: Topological organisation and replication of mammalian mitochondrial DNA. BioEssays: news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology. 2011;33:290–299. doi: 10.1002/bies.201000137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Kazak L, Reyes A, Holt IJ. Minimizing the damage: repair pathways keep mitochondrial DNA intact. Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology. 2012;13:659–671. doi: 10.1038/nrm3439. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Oldenburg DJ, Kumar RA, Bendich AJ. The amount and integrity of mtDNA in maize decline with development. Planta. 2013;237:603–617. doi: 10.1007/s00425-012-1802-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Ameur A, et al. Ultra-deep sequencing of mouse mitochondrial DNA: mutational patterns and their origins. PLoS genetics. 2011;7:e1002028. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Kauppila TES, Kauppila JHK, Larsson NG. Mammalian Mitochondria and Aging: An Update. Cell metabolism. 2017;25:57–71. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2016.09.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Torregrosa-Munumer R, Goffart S, Haikonen JA, Pohjoismaki JL. Low doses of ultraviolet radiation and oxidative damage induce dramatic accumulation of mitochondrial DNA replication intermediates, fork regression, and replication initiation shift. Molecular biology of the cell. 2015;26:4197–4208. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E15-06-0390. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Stojkovic G, et al. Oxidative DNA damage stalls the human mitochondrial replisome. Scientific reports. 2016;6:28942. doi: 10.1038/srep28942. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Hyvarinen AK, et al. The mitochondrial transcription termination factor mTERF modulates replication pausing in human mitochondrial DNA. Nucleic acids research. 2007;35:6458–6474. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkm676. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Shi Y, et al. Mitochondrial transcription termination factor 1 directs polar replication fork pausing. Nucleic acids research. 2016;44:5732–5742. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw302. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Goffart S, et al. Twinkle mutations associated with autosomal dominant progressive external ophthalmoplegia lead to impaired helicase function and in vivo mtDNA replication stalling. Human molecular genetics. 2009;18:328–340. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddn359. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Wanrooij S, Goffart S, Pohjoismaki JL, Yasukawa T, Spelbrink JN. Expression of catalytic mutants of the mtDNA helicase Twinkle and polymerase POLG causes distinct replication stalling phenotypes. Nucleic acids research. 2007;35:3238–3251. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkm215. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Atanassova N, et al. Sequence-specific stalling of DNA polymerase gamma and the effects of mutations causing progressive ophthalmoplegia. Human molecular genetics. 2011;20:1212–1223. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddq565. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Krishnan KJ, et al. What causes mitochondrial DNA deletions in human cells? Nat Genet. 2008;40:275–279. doi: 10.1038/ng.f.94. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Phillips AF, et al. Single-Molecule Analysis of mtDNA Replication Uncovers the Basis of the Common Deletion. Molecular cell. 2017;65:527–538 e526. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2016.12.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Holt IJ, Jacobs HT. Unique features of DNA replication in mitochondria: a functional and evolutionary perspective. BioEssays: news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology. 2014;36:1024–1031. doi: 10.1002/bies.201400052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Miralles Fuste J, et al. In vivo occupancy of mitochondrial single-stranded DNA binding protein supports the strand displacement mode of DNA replication. PLoS genetics. 2014;10:e1004832. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1004832. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Reyes A, et al. Mitochondrial DNA replication proceeds via a ‘bootlace’ mechanism involving the incorporation of processed transcripts. Nucleic acids research. 2013;41:5837–5850. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt196. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Fuste JM, et al. Mitochondrial RNA polymerase is needed for activation of the origin of light-strand DNA replication. Molecular cell. 2010;37:67–78. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2009.12.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Brown TA, Cecconi C, Tkachuk AN, Bustamante C, Clayton DA. Replication of mitochondrial DNA occurs by strand displacement with alternative light-strand origins, not via a strand-coupled mechanism. Genes Dev. 2005;19:2466–2476. doi: 10.1101/gad.1352105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Torregrosa-Munumer R, et al. PrimPol is required for replication reinitiation after mtDNA damage. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2017;114:11398–11403. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1705367114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Saini N, et al. Migrating bubble during break-induced replication drives conservative DNA synthesis. Nature. 2013;502:389–392. doi: 10.1038/nature12584. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Bowmaker M, et al. Mammalian mitochondrial DNA replicates bidirectionally from an initiation zone. The Journal of biological chemistry. 2003;278:50961–50969. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M308028200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Holt IJ, Lorimer HE, Jacobs HT. Coupled leading- and lagging-strand synthesis of mammalian mitochondrial DNA. Cell. 2000;100:515–524. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80688-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Reyes A, Yang MY, Bowmaker M, Holt IJ. Bidirectional replication initiates at sites throughout the mitochondrial genome of birds. The Journal of biological chemistry. 2005;280:3242–3250. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M411916200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Graham JE, Marians KJ, Kowalczykowski SC. Independent and Stochastic Action of DNA Polymerases in the Replisome. Cell. 2017;169:1201–1213 e1217. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2017.05.041. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Herbers E, Kekalainen NJ, Hangas A, Pohjoismaki JL, Goffart S. Tissue specific differences in mitochondrial DNA maintenance and expression. Mitochondrion. 2018 doi: 10.1016/j.mito.2018.01.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Pohjoismaki JL, et al. Human heart mitochondrial DNA is organized in complex catenated networks containing abundant four-way junctions and replication forks. The Journal of biological chemistry. 2009;284:21446–21457. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109.016600. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Courcelle J, Donaldson JR, Chow KH, Courcelle CT. DNA damage-induced replication fork regression and processing in Escherichia coli. Science. 2003;299:1064–1067. doi: 10.1126/science.1081328. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Cotta-Ramusino C, et al. Exo1 processes stalled replication forks and counteracts fork reversal in checkpoint-defective cells. Molecular cell. 2005;17:153–159. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2004.11.032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Giannattasio M, et al. Visualization of recombination-mediated damage bypass by template switching. Nature structural & molecular biology. 2014;21:884–892. doi: 10.1038/nsmb.2888. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Nicholls TJ, et al. Topoisomerase 3alpha Is Required for Decatenation and Segregation of Human mtDNA. Molecular cell. 2018;69:9–23 e26. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2017.11.033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Pohjoismaki JL, et al. Alterations to the expression level of mitochondrial transcription factor A, TFAM, modify the mode of mitochondrial DNA replication in cultured human cells. Nucleic acids research. 2006;34:5815–5828. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkl703. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Pohjoismaki JL, et al. Overexpression of Twinkle-helicase protects cardiomyocytes from genotoxic stress caused by reactive oxygen species. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2013;110:19408–19413. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1303046110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Pohjoismaki JL, et al. Developmental and pathological changes in the human cardiac muscle mitochondrial DNA organization, replication and copy number. PloS one. 2010;5:e10426. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0010426. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Peeva V, et al. Linear mitochondrial DNA is rapidly degraded by components of the replication machinery. Nature communications. 2018;9:1727. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-04131-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Matic S, et al. Mice lacking the mitochondrial exonuclease MGME1 accumulate mtDNA deletions without developing progeria. Nature communications. 2018;9:1202. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-03552-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Kornblum C, et al. Loss-of-function mutations in MGME1 impair mtDNA replication and cause multisystemic mitochondrial disease. Nat Genet. 2013;45:214–219. doi: 10.1038/ng.2501. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Nicholls TJ, et al. Linear mtDNA fragments and unusual mtDNA rearrangements associated with pathological deficiency of MGME1 exonuclease. Human molecular genetics. 2014;23:6147–6162. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddu336. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Trifunovic A, et al. Premature ageing in mice expressing defective mitochondrial DNA polymerase. Nature. 2004;429:417–423. doi: 10.1038/nature02517. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Uhler JP, et al. MGME1 processes flaps into ligatable nicks in concert with DNA polymerase gamma during mtDNA replication. Nucleic acids research. 2016;44:5861–5871. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw468. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Pohjoismaki JL, Goffart S, Spelbrink JN. Replication stalling by catalytically impaired Twinkle induces mitochondrial DNA rearrangements in cultured cells. Mitochondrion. 2011;11:630–634. doi: 10.1016/j.mito.2011.04.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Ge XQ, Blow JJ. Chk1 inhibits replication factory activation but allows dormant origin firing in existing factories. The Journal of cell biology. 2010;191:1285–1297. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201007074. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Rudolph CJ, Upton AL, Stockum A, Nieduszynski CA, Lloyd RG. Avoiding chromosome pathology when replication forks collide. Nature. 2013;500:608–611. doi: 10.1038/nature12312. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Kowalczykowski SC. Initiation of genetic recombination and recombination-dependent replication. Trends in biochemical sciences. 2000;25:156–165. doi: 10.1016/S0968-0004(00)01569-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Yasukawa T, Yang MY, Jacobs HT, Holt IJ. A bidirectional origin of replication maps to the major noncoding region of human mitochondrial DNA. Molecular cell. 2005;18:651–662. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2005.05.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Falkenberg M, Larsson NG, Gustafsson CM. DNA replication and transcription in mammalian mitochondria. Annual review of biochemistry. 2007;76:679–699. doi: 10.1146/annurev.biochem.76.060305.152028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Cluett TJ, et al. Transcript availability dictates the balance between strand-asynchronous and strand-coupled mitochondrial DNA replication. Nucleic acids research. 2018 doi: 10.1093/nar/gky852. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Zellweger R, et al. Rad51-mediated replication fork reversal is a global response to genotoxic treatments in human cells. The Journal of cell biology. 2015;208:563–579. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201406099. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Gupta S, Yeeles JT, Marians KJ. Regression of replication forks stalled by leading-strand template damage: I. Both RecG and RuvAB catalyze regression, but RuvC cleaves the holliday junctions formed by RecG preferentially. The Journal of biological chemistry. 2014;289:28376–28387. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M114.587881. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Sen D, Nandakumar D, Tang GQ, Patel SS. Human mitochondrial DNA helicase TWINKLE is both an unwinding and annealing helicase. The Journal of biological chemistry. 2012;287:14545–14556. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.309468. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Sen D, Patel G, Patel SS, Homologous DNA. strand exchange activity of the human mitochondrial DNA helicase TWINKLE. Nucleic acids research. 2016;44:4200–4210. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw098. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Khan I, et al. Biochemical Characterization of the Human Mitochondrial Replicative Twinkle Helicase: SUBSTRATE SPECIFICITY, DNA BRANCH MIGRATION, AND ABILITY TO OVERCOME BLOCKADES TO DNA UNWINDING. The Journal of biological chemistry. 2016;291:14324–14339. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M115.712026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Hernandez AJ, Richardson CC. Gp2.5, the multifunctional bacteriophage T7 single-stranded DNA binding protein. Seminars in cell & developmental biology. 2018 doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2018.03.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Yeeles JT, Poli J, Marians KJ, Pasero P. Rescuing stalled or damaged replication forks. Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology. 2013;5:a012815. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a012815. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Bacman SR, Williams SL, Moraes CT. Intra- and inter-molecular recombination of mitochondrial DNA after in vivo induction of multiple double-strand breaks. Nucleic acids research. 2009;37:4218–4226. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkp348. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Williams SL, et al. The mtDNA mutation spectrum of the progeroid Polg mutator mouse includes abundant control region multimers. Cell metabolism. 2010;12:675–682. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2010.11.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Williams SL, Mash DC, Zuchner S, Moraes CT. Somatic mtDNA mutation spectra in the aging human putamen. PLoS genetics. 2013;9:e1003990. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Goffart S, von Kleist-Retzow JC, Wiesner RJ. Regulation of mitochondrial proliferation in the heart: power-plant failure contributes to cardiac failure in hypertrophy. Cardiovascular research. 2004;64:198–207. doi: 10.1016/j.cardiores.2004.06.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Payne BAI, et al. Mitochondrial aging is accelerated by anti-retroviral therapy through the clonal expansion of mtDNA mutations. Nat Genet. 2011;43:806–U121. doi: 10.1038/ng.863. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Szczesny RJ, et al. Identification of a novel human mitochondrial endo-/exonuclease Ddk1/c20orf72 necessary for maintenance of proper 7S DNA levels. Nucleic acids research. 2013;41:3144–3161. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Yang MY, et al. Biased incorporation of ribonucleotides on the mitochondrial L-strand accounts for apparent strand-asymmetric DNA replication. Cell. 2002;111:495–505. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(02)01075-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Davis RW, Davidson N. Electron-microscopic visualization of deletion mutations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 1968;60:243–250. doi: 10.1073/pnas.60.1.243. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Thresher R, Griffith J. Electron-Microscopic Visualization of DNA and DNA - Protein Complexes as Adjunct to Biochemical-Studies. Methods in enzymology. 1992;211:481–490. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(92)11026-F. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.