Abstract
Accumulation of heavy metals in vegetables adversely affects the well-being of human health. In this study, we investigated the heavy metals (Hg, Zn, Cu, Pb and Mn) contamination in different environmental samples collected from five major sites (Gaighat, Paijawa, Danapur, Ranipur and Marchi) of Patna. In all the samples concentration of manganese (Mn) was found to be higher in soil samples. The concentration of heavy metals in soil samples were in the order Mn > Zn > Cu > Pb > Hg in water sample; Mn > Zn > Pb > Cu > Hg, and in vegetables Mn > Zn > Cu > Pb > Hg. In all sites, majority of heavy metal were within the permissible limits except the Zn and Pb. The Zn and Pb contents in vegetables and soil were measured above the permissible limit recommended by WHO/FAO (2007) and Indian standard. The bioconcentration factors (BCFs) for the heavy metal transfer from soils to vegetables are analysed and were ranked in the order of Hg > Pb > Zn > Cu > Mn. The estimated daily intake of metals suggested low health risk despite higher metal content in soil/vegetables. The metal pollution index (MPI) analysis showed high MPI for spinach (15.6) followed by red spinach (14.0) whereas beans (8.6) showed lower metal pollution index.
Keywords: Heavy metals, Soil, Contamination, Risk
Specifications table
| Subject area | Environmental sciences |
| More specific subject area | Geochemistry and heavy metal pollution |
| Type of data | Table, figure and graph |
| How data was acquired | Atomic absorption spectroscopy (AAS), Thermoscientific, Ice 3000 Series |
| Data format | Raw and analyzed |
| Experimental factors | Water samples were collected using polyethylene bottles immersed in an open drain that was being used for irrigation purposes. 1mL of concentrated HNO3 was added in the bottle filled with water to avoid microbial utilization of heavy metals immediately after filling. Soil samples were collected in triplicate from the field receiving wastewater regularly for irrigation at the depth of 0–20 cm layer which is known to be plough layer. Vegetable samples were collected from the same field simultaneously. Care was taken to get samples of the same varieties and age group from different selected sites and delicately analysis of samples were done via AAS, Thermoscientific, Ice 3000 Series. |
| Experimental features | Standard methods were followed for the purpose of collecting samples, taking it to laboratory, preserving water, preparing samples (cutting, drying and grinding) and analysis. |
| Data source location | Patna city, Bihar, India. |
| Data accessibility | Detailed data are conveyed in this article |
Value of the data
|
1. Data
Different concentration levels of heavy metals in water, soil and vegetables from sampling sites Gaighat, Paijawa, Danapur, Ranipur and Marchi are given in Table 1 and Table 2. Occurrence of heavy metals in the wastewater was in an order of Mn > Zn > Cu > Pb > Hg. Among all concentration of manganese in soil was found to be higher followed by Zn, Cu, Pb and Hg respectively. Concentrations of heavy metal were below the safe limits prescribed by WHO/FAO (2007) [1] and Indian standards [2]. However, heavy metal concentrations in vegetables are in the order of Zn > Mn > Cu > Pb > Hg respectively (Fig. 1).
Table 1.
Concentrations of Heavy metals in Water and Soil samples across the sampling sites of Patna city.
| Heavy metals | Water (mg/L) | Permissible limit |
Permissible limit |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WHO/FAO (2007) | Indian Standard (2000) | Soil (mg/Kg) | WHO/FAO | Indian Standard (2000) | |||
| Hg | Range | 0.001–0.008 | 0.18–0.923 | ||||
| Mean | 0.006 | 0.445 | |||||
| Zn | Range | 0–0.223 | 2.0 | 5.0 | 76.11–347.46 | 300–600 | |
| Mean | 0.065 | 136.952 | |||||
| Pb | Range | 0.058–0.066 | 5.0 | 0.10 | 14.53–57.42 | 250–500 | |
| Mean | 0.061 | 24.454 | |||||
| Cu | Range | 0–0.018 | 0.20 | 0.05 | 31.22–119.61 | 135–270 | |
| Mean | 0.003 | 49.604 | |||||
| Mn | Range | 0.124–0.338 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 298.92–642.48 | ||
| Mean | 0.239 | 417.73 | |||||
Table 2.
Heavy metal concentration (in milligrams per kilogram dry weight) in vegetable samples grown in wastewater-irrigated agricultural field.
| Sampling site | Vegetables | Heavy Metal concentration in mg/Kg |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hg | Zn | Pb | Cu | Mn | ||
| Gaighat | Spinach | 0.240 | 137.84 | 14.61 | 29.65 | 41.37 |
| Red Spinach | 0.169 | 118.72 | 11.66 | 36.16 | 64.48 | |
| Bean | 0.211 | 85.26 | 9.42 | 10.64 | 26.20 | |
| Lady finger | 0.191 | 80.88 | 13.17 | 12.27 | 27.31 | |
| Cabbage | 0.154 | 80.02 | 24.2 | 6.30 | 20.72 | |
| Paijawa | Spinach | 0.189 | 161.82 | 30.08 | 4.56 | 143.36 |
| Cabbage | 0.171 | 183.72 | 27.44 | 28.10 | 68.48 | |
| Cauliflower | 0.145 | 68.52 | 29.34 | 26.02 | 13.52 | |
| Danapur | Spinach | 0.269 | 53.91 | 13.15 | 18.87 | 136.75 |
| Cauliflower | 0.186 | 32.88 | 14.90 | 5.73 | 13.09 | |
| Ranipur | Spinach | 0.542 | 60.32 | 13.11 | 13.67 | 75.28 |
| Cabbage | 0.541 | 42.73 | 15.84 | 2.83 | 26.03 | |
| Cauliflower | 0.705 | 37.32 | 13.68 | 2.17 | 21.96 | |
| Marchi | Cabbage | 0.455 | 32.94 | 12.95 | 3.11 | 26.81 |
| Cauliflower | 0.592 | 24.66 | 11.57 | 36.3 | 17.96 | |
| Beetroot | 0.393 | 50.31 | 12.61 | 11.78 | 40.43 | |
| WHO/FAO (2007) | 60 | 5 | 40 | |||
| IS (2000) | 50 | 2.5 | 30 | |||
Fig. 1.
Concentration of heavy metals in vegetable samples collected from wastewater irrigated sites of Patna city.
1.1. Bioconcentration factor (BCF)
The bioconcentration factors (BCFs) estimated for the heavy metal transfer from soils to vegetables are shown in Table 3. The BCF values of the heavy metals such as Hg, Zn, Pb, Cu, and Mn were found to be in the ranges of 0.2–0.9, 0.2 to 1.5, 0.2 to 1.9, 0.1 to 0.5, and 0.1 to 0.2, respectively. The trend in the BCF for heavy metals in the sampling sites was in the ranking order of Hg > Pb > Zn > Cu > Mn. The food chain (soil-plant-human) is mainly known as one of the major pathways for exposure of human to soil contaminants.
Table 3.
Bio-concentration of different metals in vegetables irrigated with waste water of Patna city.
| Heavy metals | Gaighat | Paijawa | Danapur | Ranipur | Marchi |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hg | 0.209 | 0.569 | 1.261 | 1.928 | 0.921 |
| Zn | 0.289 | 1.534 | 0.481 | 0.577 | 0.472 |
| Pb | 0.254 | 1.919 | 0.836 | 0.769 | 0.851 |
| Cu | 0.158 | 0.582 | 0.393 | 0.195 | 0.545 |
| Mn | 0.12 | 0.216 | 0.173 | 0.111 | 0.044 |
Soil-to-plant transfer is one of the key processes of human exposure to toxic heavy metals through the food chain. When BCF <1 or BAF = 1, it denotes that the plant only absorbs the heavy metal but does not accumulate when BCF >1, and this indicates that plant accumulates the heavy metals. BAF values of Hg, Zn and Pb were found to be greater than one which means that they are not only absorbing the heavy metals but also they are accumulating the heavy metals concentration which may cause health problems for human whereas BAF values of Cu and Mn were found to be less than one in the vegetable samples which indicates that plants only absorb the heavy metals not accumulate them [3].
1.2. Daily intake of metals (DIM)
Assessing the exposure level and tracing the path of contaminants to the observed organisms are of great value as a result to observe the underlying health risks (see Fig. 2). There may be several pathways but food chain is proved to be the important pathway of human exposure heavy metals. DIM in adults as well as children were calculated using the average amount of vegetable consumed by them on daily routine (Table 4). Fig. 2 shows the DIM in adults and children from different vegetables. DIM values for heavy metals were found to be almost negligible for Hg but were found to be highest in case of Zn, Mn, Pb and Cu from the consumption of spinach, red spinach, cabbage and beans respectively, for both adults and children, grown in wastewater-irrigated soils. DIM suggest that the consumption of vegetables grown in wastewater contaminated soils is high, but it is nearly free of risks, as the dietary intake limits of Cu, Zn and Mn in adults can range from 1.2 to 3.0 mg, 5.0–22.0 mg and 2.0–20.0 mg, respectively [4].
Fig. 2.
Comparison of heavy metals intake by adult and children through vegetables irrigated with waste water of Patna city.
Table 4.
Daily intakes of metals (in mg) for individual heavy metal in different vegetables grown in wastewater - irrigated agricultural area.
| Plants | Hg |
Zn |
Pb |
Cu |
Mn |
|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adult | Child | Adult | Child | Adult | Child | Adult | Child | Adult | Child | |
| Spinach | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.054 | 0.062 | 0.009 | 0.010 | 0.008 | 0.010 | 0.051 | 0.059 |
| Red Spinach | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.062 | 0.071 | 0.006 | 0.007 | 0.018 | 0.021 | 0.033 | 0.038 |
| Beans | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.044 | 0.051 | 0.004 | 0.005 | 0.005 | 0.006 | 0.013 | 0.015 |
| L. Finger | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.042 | 0.048 | 0.006 | 0.007 | 0.006 | 0.007 | 0.014 | 0.016 |
| Cabbage | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.044 | 0.054 | 0.010 | 0.012 | 0.005 | 0.006 | 0.018 | 0.021 |
| Cauliflower | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.021 | 0.024 | 0.009 | 0.010 | 0.009 | 0.010 | 0.008 | 0.010 |
| Beetroot | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.026 | 0.030 | 0.006 | 0.007 | 0.006 | 0.007 | 0.021 | 0.024 |
1.3. Metal pollution index (MPI)
Calculation of Metal pollution index (MPI) is effective method for monitoring of metal pollution in wastewater irrigated areas [5]. Among all collected different vegetable samples, spinach (15.659) showed highest value of MPI followed by red spinach (14.039), and beans (8.607) showed lower metal pollution index (Table 5). Higher MPI value of spinach, red spinach and cabbage recommend that leafy vegetables are potential in causing more human health risk due to the increased accumulation of heavy metals in the vegetables.
Table 5.
Metal pollution index in different foodstuffs from wastewater irrigated site.
| Samples | Metal Pollution Index |
|---|---|
| Spinach | 15.659 |
| Red spinach | 14.039 |
| Beans | 8.607 |
| Lady finger | 9.262 |
| Cabbage | 11.505 |
| Cauliflower | 9.664 |
| Beetroot | 10.349 |
2. Experimental design, materials and methods
2.1. Study area
The multi-environmental samples were collected from Patna city (25.6°N 85.1°E), Bihar, located in the southern bank of the river Ganga in Eastern India. The total area of Patna is 136 km2 (53 sq mi). The municipal area constitutes 99 km2 (38 sq mi), while the suburban area constitutes 36 km2 (14 sq mi). It has an average elevation of 53 m (174 ft). It had an estimated population of 1.68 million in 2011, making it the 19th largest city in India. With over 2 million people, its urban agglomeration is the 18th largest in India. Surveillance was done in urban and semi-urban areas of Patna city to find out those sites were industrial wastewater, municipal and domestic sewage is used for irrigation purpose. Five sampling sites were identified were wastewater is direct source of irrigation including Danapur, Gaighat, Ranipur, Paijawa and Marchi were vegetables are grown using wastewater (Fig. 3).
Fig. 3.
Detailed of Sampling sites of Patna city.
2.2. Sampling of soil, water and vegetables
Samples of water, soil and vegetables were collected from five different sites namely Danapur, Gaighat, Ranipur, Paijawa and Marchi located in Patna city. Samples were collected in the morning between 6:00 a.m.–10:00 a.m. from the irrigation sites from December to February in 2016–2017. However, the samples of water were collected immersed in an open drain that was being used for irrigation purposes. 1mL of concentrated HNO3 was added in the bottle filled with water to avoid microbial utilization of heavy metals immediately after filling. Soil samples were collected in triplicate from the field receiving wastewater regularly for irrigation at the depth of 0–20 cm layer which is known to be plough layer. Vegetable samples were collected from the same field simultaneously. Care was taken to get samples of the same varieties and age group from different selected sites. Samples of seven different kinds of vegetables; leafy vegetables included Spinach (Spinacia oleracea), Red spinach (Amaranthus dubius) and Cabbage (Brassica oleracea L. Var. Capatuta). Inflorescence vegetable included Cauliflower (Brassica oleracea L. Var. botrytis), Fruit vegetables included Lady's Finger (Abelmoschus esculentus L.), Beetroot (Beta vulgaris), and Beans (Phaseolus vulgaris) were taken from the same experimental sites where waters and soils samples were taken.
2.3. Preparation of sample
Samples of vegetables were then washed using clean water and then air dried till constant weight was achieved. The samples were then crushed separately through a steel grinder and the crushed material was then passed through 2-mm sieve. The sieved samples were kept at ambient temperature before analysis.
For the analysis of heavy metals, 100 ml of water samples were digested after adding 10 ml. of concentrated nitric acid (HNO3) at 80 °C. The heating was continued, until the solution appeared transparent. After cooling the digested samples were then diluted up to 100 ml with distilled water [6].
For Soil and vegetables samples, 0.5 g of dried samples was digested with 10mL of HNO3 at 250 °C in tefflon bomb on hot plate until a transparent solution was obtained. The solution was then filtered through Whattman No. 42 filter paper and the solution was finally diluted to 50mL with distilled water [7].
2.4. Analysis of sample
2.4.1. Determination of heavy metals
The prepared samples were then analysed by using Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometer (AAS, Thermoscientific, Ice 3000 Series). The AAS value of blank solution was taken for each heavy metal.
2.5. Data analysis
2.5.1. Bioconcentration factor (BCF)
It refers to the ratio of concentration of metal in plant parts to the metal concentration in the soil.
In order to assess the concentration of metals from soil to vegetables, the BCF values of metals were calculated as follows:
BCF = Cvegetables/Csoil
Where, Cvegetable and Csoil represent the concentration of heavy metals in vegetables and soils, respectively [2], [10].
2.5.2. Daily intake of metals (DIM)
The daily intake of metals (DIM) was calculated using the following equation:
DIM = M × K × I/W
Where,
M = Concentration of heavy metals in plants (mg kg−1),
K = Conversion factor,
I = Daily intake of vegetables,
W = Average body weight,
At first, weights of the fresh vegetables were converted into dry weight by using the value of conversion factor 0.085, as described previously [8]. The average body weights of the adult and child were considered to be 55.9 and 32.7 kg, respectively, while the average daily intakes of vegetable for adults and children's were considered to be 0.345 and 0.232 kg/person/day, respectively [9].
2.5.3. Metal pollution index (MPI)
To analyse the overall concentration of heavy metal in all the vegetable samples collected from the different wastewater irrigated site, metal pollution index (MPI) was used. This index was obtained by calculating the geometrical mean of concentrations of all the metals in the vegetables [10].
MPI (mg/Kg) = (Cf1 × Cf2 × …….. × Cfn)1/n
Where, Cfn = concentration of metal n in the sample.
Acknowledgement
The present work is funded by the University Grants Commission, Government of India (No.F.30-68/2014 (BSR)
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
References
- 1.WHO/FAO . 2007. Joint FAO/WHO Food Standard Programme Codex Alimentarius Commission 13th Session. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Chary N.S., Kamala C.T., Raj D.S.S. Assessing risk of heavy metals from consuming food grown on sewage irrigated soils and food chain transfer. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2008;69(3):513–524. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2007.04.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Satpathy D., Reddy M.V., Dhal S.P. Risk assessment of heavy metals contamination in paddy soil, plants, and grains (Oryza sativa L.) at the East Coast of India. BioMed Res. Int. 2014 doi: 10.1155/2014/545473. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.World Health Organization . vol. 2. World Health Organization; Geneva: 1996. Health criteria and other supporting information; pp. 31–388. (Guidelines for Drinking Water Quality). 2. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Singh A., Sharma R.K., Agrawal M., Marshall F.M. Health risk assessment of heavy metals via dietary intake of foodstuffs from the wastewater irrigated site of a dry tropical area of India. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2010;48(2):611–619. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2009.11.041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.APHA, AWWA and WEF . XX Edn. American Public Health Association; Washington, DC: 2005. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Devi N.L., Yadav I.C. Chemometric evaluation of heavy metal pollutions in Patna region of the Ganges alluvial plain, India: implication for source apportionment and health risk assessment. Environ. Geochem. Health. 2018;40(6):2343–2358. doi: 10.1007/s10653-018-0101-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Rattan R.K., Datta S.P., Chhonkar P.K., Suribabu K., Singh A.K. Long-term impact of irrigation with sewage effluents on heavy metal content in soils, crops and groundwater—a case study. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2005;109(3):310–322. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Chen Y., Wang C., Wang Z. Residues and source identification of persistent organic pollutants in farmland soils irrigated by effluents from biological treatment plants. Environ. Int. 2005;31:778–783. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2005.05.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Singh A., Sharma R.K., Agrawal M., Marshall F.M. Health risk assessment of heavy metals via dietary intake of foodstuffs from the wastewater irrigated site of a dry tropical area of India. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2010;48(2):611–619. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2009.11.041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]



