Abstract
Background
In the context of sustainable development, yeast are one class of microorganisms foreseen for the production of oil from diverse renewable feedstocks, in particular those that do not compete with the food supply. However, their use in bulk production, such as for the production of biodiesel, is still not cost effective, partly due to the possible poor use of desired substrates or poor robustness in the practical bioconversion process. We investigated the natural capacity of Blastobotrys adeninivorans, a yeast already used in biotechnology, to store lipids under different conditions.
Results
The genotyping of seven strains showed the species to actually be composed of two different groups, one that (including the well-known strain LS3) could be reassigned to Blastobotrys raffinosifermentans. We showed that, under nitrogen limitation, strains of both species can synthesize lipids to over 20% of their dry-cell weight during shake-flask cultivation in glucose or xylose medium for 96 h. In addition, organic acids were excreted into the medium. LS3, our best lipid-producing strain, could also accumulate lipids from exogenous oleic acid, up to 38.1 ± 1.6% of its dry-cell weight, and synthesize lipids from various sugar substrates, up to 36.6 ± 0.5% when growing in cellobiose. Both species, represented by LS3 and CBS 8244T, could grow with little filamentation in the lipogenic medium from 28 to 45 °C and reached lipid titers ranging from 1.76 ± 0.28 to 3.08 ± 0.49 g/L in flasks. Under these conditions, the maximum bioconversion yield (YFA/S = 0.093 ± 0.017) was obtained with LS3 at 37 °C. The presence of genes for predicted subunits of an ATP citrate lyase in the genome of LS3 reinforces its oleaginous character.
Conclusions
Blastobotrys adeninivorans and B. raffinosifermentans, which are known to be xerotolerant and genetically-tractable, are promising biotechnological yeasts of the Saccharomycotina that could be further developed through genetic engineering for the production of microbial oil. To our knowledge, this is the first report of efficient lipid storage in yeast when cultivated at a temperature above 40 °C. This paves the way to help reducing costs through consolidated bioprocessing.
Electronic supplementary material
The online version of this article (10.1186/s13068-019-1492-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Keywords: Microbial oil, Lipid metabolism, Biotechnology, Saccharomycotina, Thermotolerance, Oleaginous yeasts
Background
The use of renewable feedstocks to produce microbial oil for biodiesel or other applications has become a scientific and environmental issue over the last two decades. Oleaginous yeasts, defined as those that can accumulate lipids to over 20% of their dry-cell weight (DCW), are still being screened and can be found in different taxa. A useful criterion is their ability to grow on pentoses or polysaccharides, which are lignocellulosic sugars. However, although some of these yeasts are immediately suitable for providing useful enzymes (such as sugar hydrolases), their capacity to be custom engineered for specific lipid production will require additional effort. Conversely, known genetically-tractable yeasts may not have yet been tested for their oleaginous potential.
Blastobotrys adeninivorans is part of a basal clade of the Saccharomycotina subphylum [1] and diverged long before Saccharomyces cerevisiae. The species was first described in 1984, under the name of Trichosporon adeninovorans [2], and successively reclassified into the genera Arxula (adeninivorans) in 1990 [3] and Blastobotrys in 2007 [1]. A few natural isolates of soil, plant (wood hydrolysate, silage), or animal origin have been described in the literature or deposited in culture collections. Among them, the type strain CBS 8244T and the industrial strain LS3 have been the best studied, LS3 being used to develop auxotrophic recipients for genetic transformation [4, 5].
Since the early 1990s, the species has attracted attention because of its interesting biochemical, physiological, and genetic properties. First, it exhibits a versatile metabolism, indicative of the presence of various degradative enzymes and pathways linked to central metabolism [6]. One to several strains can assimilate a number of sugar substrates, such as d-galactose, d-xylose, l-arabinose, raffinose, sucrose, trehalose, cellobiose, starch, and arbutin, and can also ferment some of them (glucose, sucrose, and starch) [6, 7]. Organic acids (e.g., pyruvate, acetate, and butyrate), as well as aromatic compounds (e.g., hydroxybenzoates), may also serve as a growth source [6, 7]. Moreover, various nitrogenous compounds may serve as nitrogen sources (e.g., urea, formamide, ethanolamine, and most amino acids), both carbon and nitrogen sources (e.g., adenine, acetamide, uric acid, putrescine, and some amino acids) [6, 7], or an energy source via nitrate reductase [8]. Second, B. adeninivorans exhibits extremophilic traits, such as halotolerance, osmotolerance, and thermotolerance. This last characteristic is particularly interesting, as only a few yeasts, especially few biotechnological yeasts, have been found to grow at temperatures over 40 °C [9, 10]. Indeed, B. adeninivorans is able to grow at up to 48 °C [11] and survive a few hours at 55 °C [12]. In addition, as shown in the case of the LS3 strain, temperature can induce a reversible developmental state, with the cells being mainly in the yeast form at lower temperatures and (pseudo)hyphae forms at higher temperatures (above 42 °C) [11]. Third, with an eye towards metabolic engineering, valuable information has been brought to light by sequencing of the complete genome of LS3 [13] and integrative plasmids and recipient strains for genetic engineering have been developed [14]. The small size of the haploid genome of this yeast (11.8 Mb) is an additional advantage for gene function studies or chassis strain development for various applications.
Blastobotrys adeninivorans has earned its stripes as a biotechnological yeast mainly after being engineered in the laboratory of Kunze. It has been engineered for diverse applications, such as for a biosensor, a platform for protein expression, and a solventogenic yeast for butanol production [14]. Efficient cultivation in bioreactors has also been achieved, with Stöckmann et al. reporting a biomass titer of 240 g/L under pressure [15]. The ability of B. adeninivorans to produce lipids has been rarely reported in the literature. Strain LS3 was included in an assay to monitor lipid bodies by impedance spectroscopy a decade ago [16]. More recently, Olstorpe et al. [17] reported the relative fatty acid (FA) composition of two strains of this species, without however mentioning the total amount of lipid.
Several yeast species are well-known lipid producers. Three have attracted most of the research efforts in recent years [18]: Yarrowia lipolytica and Lipomyces starkeyi, belonging to the Saccharomycotina, and Rhodotorula (Rhodosporidium) toruloides, belonging to the Basidiomycota. All three species exhibit a genome size of over 20 Mb [19–21]. L. starkeyi and R. toruloides are known for their utilization of a wide range of substrates and their outstanding lipogenic capabilities (up to 70% DCW as lipids) [22–24]. L. starkeyi is particularly well suited for rapid and simultaneous utilization of sugar mixtures, reaching a lipid content of 52% DCW and a lipid titer of 13.3 g/L in a mixture of cellobiose and glucose [25]. Strain diversity or culture conditions may alter lipid production; to maximize lipid production, the synthesis of endopolysaccharides under nitrogen limitation should be avoided [26]. Although progress has been made in recent years, the genetic engineering of these yeasts is still a shortcoming [18]. B. adeninivorans is phylogenetically close to Y. lipolytica [27]. Some strains of Y. lipolytica, as well as other species in the genus, are naturally more prone to store lipids from exogenous hydrophobic compounds than to turn glucose into lipids. Lipid content can easily reach 30% DCW [28] in the former case and generally 6 to 15% DCW in the latter [28, 29]. Metabolic engineering and/or process optimization, as well as strain screening, have been successfully used to increase lipid content above 35% DCW and reportedly up to 90%. Y. lipolytica has also required genetic engineering or specific culture conditions to utilize xylose, cellobiose, or cellulose polymers, which are major components of lignocellulosic materials. Depending on the strain, biotechnological processes should be fine-tuned to prevent excessive excretion of citric acid, which competes with lipid production in the presence of excess carbon, and strong filamentation, which depends on multiple parameters (dissolved oxygen, medium composition, and initial carbon concentration, etc.) and may alter the process of lipid production and its yield [30, 31].
None of these species has been reported to grow at temperatures above 37 °C, though some thermotolerant strains may have been isolated. An R. toruloides DMKU3-TK16 mutant obtained through an adaptive breeding strategy can store lipids at approximately 14% DCW at 37 °C [32]. However, working at upper temperatures could provide specific advantages for compound solubilization (e.g., FA), help to minimize the costs of cooling of bioreactors and facilitate consolidated bioprocesses. These processes are considered to be relevant at a temperature around 50 °C as microbial enzymes involved in the degradation of hemicellulose/cellulose or starch have been generally described to have optimal temperatures above 40 °C, up to 60 °C [10, 33, 34].
The upper permissive temperature for growth of eucaryotes has been considered to be near 60 °C [35], far below that of eubacteria and archae. Relatively few thermophilic fungi were found to grow at elevated temperatures, optimally around 55 °C, and tolerated up to 61 °C [36, 37]. Some of these (not yeast-like) fungi might be useful bioconverters of lignocellulosic residues into sugars [37]. Yeast species comprising strains able to grow at temperatures up to 45 °C were listed in a specific survey by Robert et al. in 2015 [9]. Among the 28 most thermotolerant species, two are well-known for different applications not related to lipid production, Ogataea (Hansenula) polymorpha and Kluyveromyces marxianus [38]. Few others were reported with a lipid content over 20% DCW in screening studies, such as Kodamaea ohmeri [39] and Kurtzmaniella cleridarum [40]. We are not aware of studies concerning lipid accumulation at high temperatures, except for K. marxianus. The potential of K. marxianus as an oleaginous yeast is unclear. A strain isolated from Kefir exhibited over 30% DCW in lipids [41], while different strategies—including genetic modifications typically used in other organisms—to increase lipogenesis of several K. marxianus strains yielded at best a FA content of 16% DCW [42].
Because of its aforementioned advantageous traits, we reasoned that B. adeninivorans could be a valuable thermotolerant oleaginous yeast. Here, we assessed the ability of Blastobotrys species to naturally produce and accumulate lipids from a set of different substrates. Several strains of what was believed to be B. adeninivorans were used to examine the robustness of lipid production in the species. However, in the course of our study, strain genotyping showed that they can be divided into two different groups and various marker sequences actually placed the LS3 group into the Blastobotrys raffinosifermentans species. We took advantage of the thermotolerance of these yeasts and assayed lipid production at various temperatures, up to 45 °C. Overall, the natural capacity of these two species to produce lipids is promising and may be an alternative to currently-studied oleaginous yeasts.
Results and discussion
Nitrogen limitation and lipid accumulation in strain LS3
Oleaginous yeasts generally synthesize and abundantly store lipids in lipid droplets under specific environmental conditions, one of which is nitrogen limitation [43, 44]. In addition to FA synthesis, these yeasts can import and direct exogenous FAs into the lipid storage pathway, sometimes with particularly high efficiency, such as in Y. lipolytica [45].
We examined the capacity of strain LS3 to store lipids after neo-synthesis from glucose or after accumulation from exogenous oleic acid. We performed flask cultivation in YNB-based media with two different carbon sources at a fixed concentration of 30 g/L (glucose or a mixture of oleic acid and glucose) and two different concentrations of NH4Cl as a unique nitrogen source (5 g/L or 0.75 g/L) to vary the carbon-to-nitrogen ratio (C/N). Efficient lipid storage occurred following growth in both substrates to above 30% DCW. However, as expected, it strongly relied on a low-nitrogen concentration when glucose was the sole substrate (Fig. 1a). When the exogenous FA C18:1 was provided, the FA profile of the strain was enriched in C18:1 (Fig. 1b), suggesting entry of the FA directly into the storage pathway. BODIPY staining showed storage to occur in the form of neutral lipids in lipid droplets in both cases (Fig. 1c). Our results show that strain LS3 has a good natural capacity for both lipogenesis and lipid accumulation upon FA uptake; in reaching approximately 30% DCW as lipids from glucose, it may be qualified as oleaginous.
The genome of strain LS3 encodes a putative ATP citrate lyase
The complete genome sequence of LS3 (first identified as B. adeninivorans, then reassigned to B. raffinosifermentans; see below and Table 1), already recognized to be of biotechnological interest, was published a few years ago [13]. We searched the genome for potential “markers” of oleaginicity by mining the genome of LS3 for specific genes involved in lipid metabolism, using proteins of Y. lipolytica as a query (Table 2). First, cytoplasmic ATP citrate lyase (ACL), which can efficiently convert respiratory citrate to acetyl-CoA for FA biosynthesis, is considered to be a signature (first biochemical then genetic) of oleaginous yeasts [46–48]. ACL, of which the subunits are encoded by two distinct genes in LS3, could be confidently predicted by its high amino acid similarity with this enzyme in Y. lipolytica (Table 2). The presence of these genes suggests the native oleaginous character of the Blastobotrys strain. Second, we found that LS3 possesses a copy of an AAL-like gene encoding putative peroxisomal acyl-CoA synthetase (Table 2). Homologous gene products in Y. lipolytica, which has a family of ten genes of Acyl/Aryl-CoA-ligases (AAL), were shown to be responsible for the activation of FAs into acyl-CoA [48]. Although various types of acyl-CoA synthetases are found in yeast (e.g., Faa2 in S. cerevisiae), the distribution of these particular AAL-like genes was hypothesized to be biased towards oleaginous species [48]. Third, we examined the formation of triacylglycerol (TG). In yeast, TG synthesis relies on esterification of diacylglycerol with a third FA [49]. This last step of TG formation has been considered to be a limiting step for oil storage. It involves acyl-CoA dependent diacylglycerol acetyltransferases (DGAT) and/or phospholipid:diacylglycerol acetyltransferases (PDAT), which use phospholipids as FA donors. S. cerevisiae, Y. lipolytica [50], and B. raffinosifermentans LS3 (Table 2) all possess one gene encoding a PDAT enzyme. S. cerevisiae possesses only one DGAT gene, whereas Y. lipolytica [51, 52] and LS3 (Table 2) have two DGATs, possibly emphasizing their capacity for TG storage, a preferred form of oil storage in oleaginous yeasts. While our study was being conducted, the genetic content of strain CBS 8244T (type strain of B. adeninivorans) was analyzed in a patent in view of lipid production [53]. The genome reportedly contained the two genes for ACL and two different genes for DGAT, as in LS3. The genome sequence is not available, however.
Table 1.
Strain | Synonym | Isolated from | By | Reference | New species assignment |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CBS 8244T | CSIR 577, CLIB 1468 | Soil, The Netherlands (adenine-enrichment) | Middelhoven, 1983 | [2] | B. adeninivorans (type strain) |
CBS 7766 | Reptile (liver and intestines), Sweden | Mattsson, 1993 | B. adeninivorans | ||
CBS 7350 | Maize silage, The Netherlands | Middelhoven, 1987 | B. adeninivorans | ||
LS3 | Wood hydrolysates, Russia (Siberia) | Kapultsevich, selected as industrial strain | [9] | B. raffinosifermentans | |
CBS 8335 | Soil (clay-like, pH 8.5), Italy | Middelhoven 1996 | B. raffinosifermentans | ||
CBS 7370 | CSIR 1117 | Soil (humus-rich), South Africa | van der Walt | [3] | B. raffinosifermentans |
CBS 7377 | CSIR 1118 | Soil, South Africa | van der Walt, 1988 | [3] | B. raffinosifermentans |
CSIR Council for Scientific and Industrial Research (Pretoria, South Africa), CLIB CIRM-Levures (France)
Table 2.
Gene identifier | Previous function/similarity [reference yeast]a | New function prediction | Amino acid % identity (coverage) | Process |
---|---|---|---|---|
ARAD1B07414 | Succinyl CoA ligase (alpha subunit) [sc] |
ATP:citrate lyase (subunit) EC:2.3.3.8 |
88% (99%) with YALI0E34793 | Formation of cytosolic acetyl-CoA, precursor of FA synthesis |
ARAD1D32164 | Succinyl CoA ligase (beta subunit) [sc] |
ATP:citrate lyase (subunit) EC:2.3.3.8 |
82% (100%) with YALI0D24431 | Formation of cytosolic acetyl-CoA, precursor of FA synthesis |
ARAD1C08250 | Acyl-CoA:diacylglycerol acyltransferase (DGAT) [sc] |
DGAT (no change) EC:2.3.1.20 |
69% (59%) with YALI0E32769 | Formation of TG |
ARAD1D42460 | Acyl-CoA:sterol acyltransferase [sc] |
DGAT EC:2.3.1.20 |
42% (86%) with YALI0D07986 | Formation of TG |
ARAD1C30118 | Weakly similar to FAT2 peroxisomal AMP binding protein [sc] | Acyl-CoA synthetase | 38% (99%) with YALI0E12419 (10 paralogs). PTS1 motifb | Formation of acyl-CoA (peroxisomal activation of FA) |
aIn the current (first) version of the annotated genome of LS3 in GRYC database. First-round annotation was performed using BLAST against S. cerevisiae (sc) as the reference yeast to look for similarity
bAKL in C terminus of the protein which likely targets it to peroxisome
Diversity among strains and species assignment
We continued our investigation of the oleaginous character of the species by expanding our investigation to several strains. Strains LS3 and CBS 8244T were previously suggested to belong to different genetic subgroups, given the size of their four chromosomes and DNA-fingerprints [54]. We thus genotyped five strains of various origins obtained from the CBS collection (Table 1) along with LS3 and CBS 8244T.
Using AluI fingerprinting of intergenic spacer rDNA (IGS), we found the seven strains to be clearly distributed into two distinct groups, a first group of three strains, including CBS 8244T, and a second group of four strains, including LS3 (Fig. 2a). The sequences of ITS and D1D2 showed the second group to be homogenous for this marker (no sequence polymorphism between strains), whereas it differs from the first group by three to five nucleotides (Fig. 2b, Additional file 1: Figure S1). The sequence of mtCOXII in CBS 7370 and LS3 confirmed the proximity of these strains, while showing divergence of CBS 8244T (Fig. 2b). The sequence of these markers for strains of the LS3 group better matched those of B. raffinosifermentans, according to the YeastIP database [55]. This species, closely related to B. adeninivorans, was described in 2007 and represented by a unique strain at that time [1]. Our results highlight the existence of two distinct groups among strains previously identified as B. adeninivorans, resulting in the reassignment of the LS3 group to the B. raffinosifermentans species.
Capacity of sugar assimilation of B. raffinosifermentans and B. adeninivorans
We examined the ability of the various strains to grow on three different simple carbohydrates, potentially useful as carbon and energy sources for microbial oil production. All strains exhibited relatively similar growth curves when cultivated in minimal medium supplemented with glucose or xylose, which reflects efficient assimilation of these substrates (maximum growth rate from 0.13 to 0.16 h−1 and stationary phase reached within 24 to 30 h in microplates). In contrast, glycerol promoted much slower and delayed growth, depending on the strain and substrate concentration (Additional file 1: Figure S2). For B. raffinosifermentans strains, the maximum growth rate ranged from 0.078 to 0.12 h−1 in 10 g/L glycerol and 0.025 (CBS 8335) to 0.1 h−1 in 2 g/L glycerol. This phase was generally preceded by a much slower growth phase or lag phase, especially in low concentrations of glycerol, extending up to 60 h. For strains of the B. adeninivorans species (CBS 8244T group), growth was very weak (10 g/L glycerol) or not visible (2 g/L glycerol) after 96 h cultivation in microplates (Additional file 1: Figure S2). In plate assays with 10 g/L glycerol, growth was also reproducibly observed to be delayed relative to growth on glucose, and all seven strains reached lower-density streaks on glycerol than glucose after 7 days at 28 °C. As a control, Y. lipolytica W29 grew similarly on both glycerol and glucose plates (data not shown).
Glycerol assimilation is a typical variable trait among yeasts [56]. Glycerol is generally regarded to be an efficient carbon source for L. starkeyi [22] and even a preferred substrate for Y. lipolytica, especially as it is first consumed when both glycerol and glucose are present [26, 57]. In contrast, most strains of S. cerevisiae do not grow in synthetic glycerol media without successful adaptation or medium supplementation with complex compounds, amino acids, or nucleobases [56]. Our results underline a difference in glycerol catabolism between some oleaginous yeasts and the two Blastobotrys species under study, or at least in its regulation. More favorable environmental conditions or conditions of possible adaptation are yet to be determined for efficient glycerol assimilation. However, glycerol is not only a potential substrate for growth but also the precursor backbone esterified by FAs in triglycerides. Sugar/glycerol blends or glycerol co-feeding have been successfully used to improve lipogenesis [58, 59] and would be interesting to evaluate in this particular context of poor glycerol catabolism, providing that transport would not be a limiting step.
Capacity for lipogenesis of B. raffinosifermentans and B. adeninivorans
We evaluated the robustness of lipogenesis among strains and investigated possible phenotypic diversity concerning this trait by assaying lipid production over time of two strains of each species (LS3 and CBS 7377 for one and CBS 8244T and CBS 7766 for the other). They were cultivated in glucose or xylose, in which all strains grew easily. We periodically measured the OD600 and FA content of the cells, as well as sugars and organic acids in the medium, throughout the 96-h cultivation in flasks under nitrogen limitation (0.75 g/L or 0.5 g/L NH4Cl in YNB medium with 30 g/L carbon source, leading to a mass carbon-to-nitrogen ratio (C/N) of 60 and 90, respectively). Under these conditions, lipogenesis began at the start of growth for all strains. The highest amount of lipids in the cells was reached after 72 h and ranged from 14 to 29% DCW (Figs. 3, 4). Lipogenesis was negligibly better at C/N 90 than C/N 60 (up to 10% better) but it lowered growth and global sugar consumption.
The four strains exhibited different behaviors in terms of growth and metabolism, lipid accumulation, organic acid excretion, and sugar consumption. There were no strict species-specific correlations. CBS 7377 was the slowest and least efficient strain for lipid accumulation, whereas LS3 (of the same species) reached the highest lipid content. Conversely, the OD reached by LS3 in stationary phase was the lowest of all strains. However, different OD may reflect morphological differences between strains rather than differences in biomass production. The results of the strains of B. adeninivorans were more similar to each other. Overall, both species cultivated in low-nitrogen medium reached a lipid content above 20%. Sugar uptake was more efficient for LS3 than for other strains in all media (Figs. 3, 4). With few exceptions, < 75% of the initial sugar was consumed by the end of experiment, leaving room for optimization of the medium and culture conditions. Within the time of the experiment, B. raffinosifermentans LS3 reached the highest lipid content among all four strains, whereas B. adeninivorans CBS 8244T accumulated lipid more slowly and probably did not reach its maximum.
The excretion of organic compounds is a well-known competing sink for lipid production, particularly that of citric acid, both an intermediate of the TCA cycle and a precursor for acetyl-CoA in oleaginous yeasts. In our shake-flask experiments, we found two different organic acids to be excreted into the medium: citric acid and acetic acid. Globally, their cumulative concentration in the medium (Figs. 3, 4) tended to steadily rise over time and reached 3.4 ± 0.2 g/L (CBS 7766 cultivated in xylose C/N 90) to 10.1 ± 0.6 g/L (LS3 cultivated in xylose C/N 90) by the end of experiment. LS3 was unique concerning the excretion of organic acids, both in terms of their total concentration, which did not increase after 50 to 60 h of cultivation in some media, and the relative proportion of acetic to citric acid. Although acetic acid was the most abundant organic acid excreted by all other strains, excretions of citric acid was equivalent or more abundant in LS3 (Additional file 1: Figure S3). In glucose media, in particular, the final concentration of acetic acid was no more than half that of citric acid for this strain. This lower final concentration of acetic acid was due to reaching the plateau early (C/N 90, Additional file 1: Figure S3) or clear reuptake of this compound (C/N 60, Additional file 1: Figure S3), whereas glucose was not exhausted.
In terms of their FA composition, Blastobotrys strains synthesized and stored four main FAs during the 96 h of cultivation, accounting for more than 96% of total FA content: C18:1 (43 to 52%, depending on the strain and medium), C16:0 (23 to 27%), C18:2 (11 to 20%), and C18:0 (4 to 11%) (Additional file 1: Figure S4). C16 and C18 FAs are typically the most abundant FAs in a wide range of yeasts and fungi [60, 61]. However, the relative proportion varies depending on the yeast and culture/media conditions. The FA fraction was particularly poor in mono unsaturated C16:1. This feature was also noted for B. adeninivorans CBS 8244T in a comparative study of the FA composition of Saccharomycotina yeasts cultivated in YPD [62].
We found consistent but only very low levels of C17 chain-length FA (< 4 mg/g DCW). Indeed, yeast are not known to naturally synthesize large amounts of such odd-chain FAs, unless provided, for example, with odd-carbon precursors or benzoate [63–65]. Olstorpe et al. [17] reported FA profiles for CBS 8244T and CBS 7377 cultured in YPD medium, which were unexpectedly poor in oleic acid (3 to 11% of total FA at 30 °C) and rich in C17:1 (20 to 29% of total FA at 30 °C). The reason for these uncommon profiles is unknown, especially since Froissard et al. [62] reported the same four main FAs in B. adeninivorans CBS 8244T cultivated in YPD at 28 °C as those observed here.
Lipid synthesis from various carbon sources
Sugars found in plants as reserve sugars or constituting lignocellulosic fibers, as well as the industrial by-product glycerol, are attractive substrates for microbial oil production. We tested the LS3 strain, our best lipid producer, for its ability to accumulate lipids while growing in various hexoses, polysaccharides, or glycerol. The FA fraction of the cells was characterized after 72 and 96 h of culture at 28 °C in YNB-based medium with the C source at 30 g/L and 0.75 g/L NH4Cl. After 96 h, lipids accumulated to above 30% DCW in all substrates, except galactose, starch, and glycerol (Fig. 5). Maximum lipid synthesis and storage was obtained for some of the sugars (i.e., cellobiose, glucose, sucrose, or fructose), likely rapidly assimilated, after 96 h in our shake-flask cultures since the rise between 72 and 96 h was less than 5.5% (Additional file 2: Table S1). In contrast, glycerol appeared to be the least favorable substrate for bioconversion into lipids (total FAs reached only 16.1 ± 0.4% DCW), probably because of its slow assimilation, which also affected the OD reached at 96 h: 11.4 ± 1.0% in glycerol instead of 16.8 ± 0.4% in cellobiose. We also observed small differences in the composition of FA profiles relative to that obtained in glucose, especially when LS3 was grown in starch or glycerol (Additional file 2: Table S1). Such variations that depend on the culture conditions have already been reported for other oleaginous yeasts [66]. In all cases, however, C18:1 was the main FA, followed in decreasing proportion by C16:0, C18:2, and C18:0 (Additional file 2: Table S1). In conclusion, all tested substrates, from simple to complex, could be turned into lipids by strain LS3, although with varying efficiency.
Efficient lipid synthesis at high temperature
Blastobotrys adeninivorans and B. raffinosifermentans, represented by the strains listed in Table 1, are known to grow at 45 °C. Temperature is known to influence plasma membrane composition, which must adapt to preserve an adequate level of fluidity and function. The nature of FAs, including their chain length and degree of unsaturation (DUS), is involved in this aspect [67–69] and we reasoned that FAs may be stored or recycled accordingly. We thus investigated the ability of two strains, LS3 (B. raffinosifermentans) and CBS 8244T (B. adeninivorans), to produce lipids at four different temperatures: 28, 37, 42, and 45 °C.
Cultures in C/N 60 glucose media were periodically monitored by OD600 and microscopy to evaluate the temperature-dependent growth capacity of the strains and possible filamentation. Both strains grew at each temperature tested (Additional file 1: Figure S5). However, growth of LS3 was lower with high temperatures (42 °C and 45 °C), in contrast to that of CBS 8244T (Additional file 1: Figure S5 for OD, Fig. 6a for biomass in g/L). Hyphae were only transiently detected in our lipogenic YNB medium (Additional file 1: Figure S5), contrary to other media, such as YPD, which gradually pushed the LS3 and CBS 8244T cells into (pseudo)hyphae phase above 37 °C and 42 °C, respectively ([11], our unpublished results in YPD medium).
As observed for growth, the amount of total cellular FAs was independent of the temperature of cultivation for CBS 8244T: approximately 19% DCW (Fig. 6b). Instead, LS3 showed an optimum at 37 °C for lipid content, reaching 30% DCW (approximately 20% higher than at 28 °C and 25% higher than at 42 to 45 °C). Despite the moderate decrease in lipid content of LS3 at temperatures above 37 °C, we concluded that lipid metabolism of B. adeninivorans and B. raffinosifermentans was still active at temperatures of up to 45 °C.
Sugar consumption was temperature-dependent for both CBS 8244T and LS3, however, with opposite trends (Fig. 6c). For strain LS3, glucose consumption was lower at elevated temperatures (42 °C and 45 °C), consistent with the lower biomass and lipid content. Instead, glucose consumption of strain CBS 8244T was higher at elevated temperatures, though the amount of lipid and biomass were globally conserved. Overall, final bioconversion yields (YFA/S) were within the range of 0.048 to 0.093 for LS3 and 0.056 to 0.070 for CBS 8244T (Fig. 6d and Additional file 2: Table S2). Higher yields were obtained at lower temperatures (28 °C, 37 °C) for both strains; the difference was more pronounced, however, for LS3.
Finally, we examined the FA composition for each strain at each temperature in detail, early in the culture (4.5 h) and at 24 h and 72 h (Additional file 1: Figure S6 and Additional file 2: Table S3). The most divergent FA profiles between the two strains were globally observed at 4.5 h. At that stage, as lipid content of the cells is still low (4 to 8% DCW), structural lipids are likely to significantly contribute to these differences. In this respect, a specific trait of CBS 8244T relative to LS3 is its richness in both C16:0 and C18:2, which is relatively independent of temperature (37 to 45 °C). A comparison of the proportions of FAs at 4.5 and 72 h showed that C18:1 accumulated preferentially over C18:2 in CBS 8244T, whereas C16:0 was preferentially stored over C18:0 in LS3. Overall, at 72 h, the DUS of total FAs was slightly lower in CBS 8244T than in LS3, regardless of the temperature (by 6 to 14%).
Temperature had only a moderate effect on global FA composition of the cells. Indeed, we were unable to detect a specific temperature-dependent FA between 28 and 45 °C; the four main FAs remained the same and their relative abundance had only a moderate impact on the global DUS and chain-length index (C16/C18). The maximum temperature-dependent difference of the DUS was 8.5% and that of C16/C18 38% for each strain at each stage of growth. Other authors have also observed that the major FAs in total lipids of various yeast species remained the same over a wide range of temperatures [67, 70, 71], although the DUS and C16/C18 could be altered by more than 25% and 100%, respectively [70, 71]. Their detailed analysis revealed complex alterations in the abundance of FAs and its dependence on temperature, the specific nature of FAs depending on the species (in particular the presence of C18:3 or C16:1) and lipid class (i.e., different categories of phospholipids, triacylglycerols, etc.). In our analysis, which considered only total lipids, the alteration of FA composition, though modest, also appeared to be complex and strain and temperature-dependent. However, elevated temperatures had a similar effect for both CBS 8244T and LS3 for certain FAs at 72 h (Additional file 1: Figure S6). From 28 to 42 °C, C16:0 and C18:1 decreased moderately in proportion to the total lipids, whereas C18:0 and C18:2 increased. Consequently, increasing temperatures led to more similar proportions of C16:0 and C18:2 (likely stored at this stage). The FA profile at 45 °C was highly similar to that at 42 °C for each strain. The strategy of adaptation to ‘high’ temperatures expectedly varies among species and strains; in the aforementioned R. toruloides thermotolerant mutant, a temperature increase from 30 to 37 °C, while stimulating lipid production, drastically raised the relative proportion of C18:1, which reached 86% of total FA [32].
In conclusion, lipid metabolism of the LS3 and CBS 8244T strains was robust at temperatures from 28 to 45 °C. Temperature had a moderate impact on the final amount and nature of total cellular FAs, although LS3 showed optimal lipid production at 37 °C. Such robustness of lipid metabolism to differences in temperature is not shared across all yeasts. For example, the lipid content of L. starkeyi DSM 70295 reportedly decreased by 57% when the culture temperature was raised from 10 to 20 °C [70]. In the thermophilic species Kluyveromyces marxianus, 11 wild-type strains recently screened for lipogenesis (the best strain reportedly reached 10% DCW, mainly stored as free FAs) had a much lower FA content at 30 than 42 °C [42].
Conclusions
Harnessing microbial lipid metabolism to produce oils or other chemicals of interest is a promising alternative to petroleum or plant oil. However, limitations in the use of yeast have been encountered, such as the poor utilization of certain types of substrates, weak xerotolerance, limited yields for lipid conversion in competition with other metabolic pathways, or difficult culturing in bioreactors (filamentation, foaming). We believe that the availability of a set of various oleaginous microorganisms adapted to different types of applications could be useful. Elevated temperatures may help reduce the costs of the process and participate in the solubilization of substrates. B. adeninivorans and B. raffinosifermentans exhibit many advantageous traits for biotechnological processes and, as reported here, were able to synthesize and store lipids at high temperatures, up to 45 °C.
Among four tested strains, LS3 was the best lipid-producing one. Although it showed a temperature dependence for growth, glucose consumption, and lipid storage, its native performance in the tested range of 28 to 45 °C is a good starting point (24 to 30% DCW from glucose).
As for other oleaginous yeasts, strain screening, process optimization, and/or metabolic engineering is likely to be successful. Knowledge of the lipid metabolism in these Blastobotrys species, as well as their genetic engineering, could be facilitated by their small genome. Accurate genome editing tools should be developed to complement existing classical genetic tools.
Materials and methods
Strains, genotyping, identification
Yeast strains formerly classified as B. adeninivorans are listed in Table 1; LS3 was in the collection of IPK, other strains were obtained from the CBS-KNAW. Y. lipolytica W29 was used as a control [72].
Genotyping of these strains was performed by intergenic spacer rDNA amplification and AluI Fingerprinting (IGSAF). The IGSAF technique has been successfully used to differentiate previously misidentified species in different taxa [73, 74].
The entire ITS + D1D2 region of the rDNA was amplified from genomic DNA in a single run, as previously described [75], using the primer pair ITSF (5′ AGGAACTAAAAGTCGTAACAAG) and DDR (5′ GGTTTTACACCCAAACACTC). After sequencing, the ITS and D1D2 sequences were delimited before multiple alignment with clustal X [76]. Sequences used for strain identification were as follows: ITS-D1D2 for LS3 was extracted from the LS3 genome sequence in the GRYC database [77] and mitochondrial COXII was retrieved from the NCBI accession number CBZY010000007; ITS-D1D2 fragments for CBS 8244T, CBS 7350, CBS 7766, CBS 8335, CBS 7377, CBS 7370, and mitochondrial mtCOXII (partial sequence) for CBS 7370 were deposited at the ENA under the study accession number PRJEB29673; type strain sequences for the mtCOXII marker were retrieved via YeastIP and the Genbank accession numbers were DQ443105.1 (CBS 6800T) and DQ443104.1 (CBS 8244).
BLAST search
Homologous gene products shared by Y. lipolytica E150 and B. raffinosifermentans LS3 were sought by reciprocal BLASTP with the BLOSUM62 matrix, using facilities of the GRYC database [77] and a threshold of 1.e−40.
Media and growth conditions
Rich medium YPD (yeast extract, peptone, and glucose, 10 g/L each) was used for precultures and minimal medium (YNB) supplemented with various carbon sources for cultures. All YNB-based media contained 1.7 g/L yeast nitrogen base (without amino acids or ammonium sulfate, Difco, Paris), NH4Cl as the nitrogen source (at various concentrations, as indicated), and were buffered with 50 mM phosphate buffer (Na2HPO4, KH2PO4, pH 6.8). Cells were cultured at 28 °C unless otherwise indicated. Absorbance at 600 nm (OD600) was measured with an LKB-Novaspec II spectrophotometer (Pharmacia), except for growth tests in microplates.
Growth tests were carried out in 96-well microplates (Greiner) incubated in a BIOTEK synergy MX plate reader under strong and constant agitation. OD600 was measured every 20 min. Wells were filled with 190 µL YNB-based buffered media with glucose, xylose, or glycerol (at either 10 or 2 g/L), all supplemented with 5 g/L NH4CL. They were inoculated with 10 µL of a cell suspension from overnight precultures in YPD and adjusted to an OD600 of 4 by the addition of the desired volume of YNB (without carbon) to the cell pellet.
Cultures for lipid accumulation
Experiments were carried out in 500-mL baffled flasks filled with 100 mL YNB-based medium and incubated under agitation at 160 rpm in a Minitron incubator (INFOR-HT, Swisserland). Carbon sources were added at a concentration of 30 g/L. When indicated, the carbon-to-nitrogen mass ratio (C/N) was adjusted to 60 or 90 by adding 0.75 g/L or 0.5 g/L NH4Cl, respectively. Oleic acid (65.0–88.0%, Sigma-Aldrich) used in this study contained 70% C18:1 (n − 9) cis, 3% C18:1 (n − 9) trans, 7% C18:2 (n − 6), 1.2% C17:1, 3.9% C16:0, 4.7% C16:1 (n − 7), 0.9% C16:1 (n − 9), and other FAs in low amounts [78]. Cultures were routinely performed at 28 °C. The experiment testing various temperatures was carried out for 72 h in four incubators in which the temperature was recorded by USB thermometers.
Precultures were grown for 20 h at 28 °C in flasks filled with YPD and used for culture inoculation at an OD600nm of 0.5. YPD of the preculture was eliminated by centrifugation and the cells resuspended in YNB without carbon and nitrogen.
Lipid and biomass quantification
Lipid content of the cells was determined by quantifying their FA fraction, as previously described [59]. Cells from-10 mL culture samples were collected in pre-weighed tubes, washed twice in water (for cultures in sugar-based medium), or twice successively in a mixture of 0.5% BSA and 0.9% NaCl and once in water (for oily medium), and resuspended in 1 mL water. After freeze-drying for 24 h at − 55 °C (Alpha 1-2Dplus, Bioblock Scientific), samples in their tubes were weighed and stored at − 20 °C. The difference in tube weights represented the mass of the cells found in 10-mL cultures and permitted calculation of the biomass in g/L.
Fatty acid methyl esters (FAMES) were recovered from 10 to 20 mg aliquots of freeze-dried cells (2 to 4 mg in samples collected at 4.5 h), using a hot methanol–H2SO4 method, adapted from Browse et al. [79], and analyzed by gas chromatography on a Varian 430 equipped with a flame-ionization detector and a FactorFour vf-23 ms column. FAMES were identified by comparison to commercial standards (FAME32; Supelco); an internal FA standard (100 µg C12:0 from Sigma) was added to each sample prior to transesterification to enable FA quantification in the analyzed aliquots.
Lipid content is expressed with respect to DCW: lipid content of 1% DCW = 10 mg FA per g of dry cell.
FA profiles, index, statistics
The main identified FAs were: C18:1 (n − 9) cis (oleic acid, simplified as C18:1 in the text), C18:0 (stearic acid), C18:2 (n − 6) cis (linoleic acid, simplified as C18:2 in the text), and C16:0 (palmitic acid). C16:1 (n − 9) cis (palmitoleic acid) and C16:1 (n − 7), both grouped under C16:1, were also identified, in low amounts. Unidentified or minor FAs were grouped under ‘other FAs’; among them, C18:3 was sporadically detected (relative amount < 0.45%).
The DUS [69] was calculated as follows: (percentage of monoene FAs + 2 × the percentage of diene FAs)/total percentage of four main FAs. C16/C18 [70] was calculated as the ratio of carbon-chain length of 16 to carbon-chain length of 18 for the four main FAs.
Kruskal and Wallis tests with multiple comparisons [80] were run using Excel facilities designed by P. Georgin, M. Gouet, and G. Le Pape.
Quantification of sugars and organic acids
Sugars and organic acids in the culture supernatants were analyzed by the HPLC method of calibration with external standards. Immediately after centrifugation of culture samples, supernatants were conserved frozen (− 20 °C). Prior to analysis, they were homogenized, centrifuged again to eliminate any remaining cells, and diluted 10 times in water. They were analyzed by HPLC (UltiMate 3000, Dionex-ThermoFisher Scientific, UK) coupled to UV (210 nm) and RI detectors. The Aminex HPX87H column (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA) was eluted with 0.01 N H2SO4 at 35 °C at a flow rate of 0.6 mL/min. Peak integration, identification, and quantification were performed using CHROMELEON software (Thermo Scientific, USA) and standards purchased at Sigma-Aldrich.
Cell imaging
Images were acquired using a Zeiss Axio Imager M2 microscope (Zeiss, Le Pecq, France) fitted with an Apochromat 100×/1.40 oil M27 objective and operated with Axiovision 4.8.2 software. Fluorescently-stained lipid bodies were visualized using Zeiss filters 45 and 46, after incubating culture samples with 1.5 µg/mL BODIPY® Lipid Probe (493/503 (D-3922), Invitrogen) for at least 15 min at room temperature.
Additional files
Acknowledgements
We thank A. Beopoulos, R. Ledesma-Amaro, and J-M. Nicaud for helpful discussions, and R. Ledesma-Amaro for critical reading of the manuscript. We also thank William Hempel of Alex Edelman and Associates for English editing of the manuscript.
Authors’ contributions
CN and AMCLC conceived and supervised the study. ST and DS performed experiments for lipid production and participated in their analysis. FF performed preliminary experiments for lipid production and carried out growth tests with AMCLC. VN performed IGSAF and genotyping. GK provided strain LS3 and knowledge on the species and discussed the results. AMCLC wrote the manuscript, which was reviewed and commented on by all authors. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Funding
This work was supported by INRA; DS was funded by IsDB (Islamic Development Bank) during his Ph.D.
Availability of data and materials
All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article and its additional files.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Stéphane Thomas and Daniel R. A. Sanya contributed equally to this work
Contributor Information
Stéphane Thomas, Email: stephane.thomas@inra.fr.
Daniel R. A. Sanya, Email: sanyadaniel86@yahoo.com
Florian Fouchard, Email: frm.fouchard@gmail.com.
Huu-Vang Nguyen, Email: vangng08@yahoo.fr.
Gotthard Kunze, Email: kunzeg@ipk-gatersleben.de.
Cécile Neuvéglise, Email: cecile.neuveglise@inra.fr.
Anne-Marie Crutz-Le Coq, Email: anne-marie.le-coq@inra.fr.
References
- 1.Kurtzman CP, Robnett CJ. Multigene phylogenetic analysis of the Trichomonascus, Wickerhamiella and Zygoascus yeast clades, and the proposal of Sugiyamaella gen. nov. and 14 new species combinations. FEMS Yeast Res. 2007;7:141–151. doi: 10.1111/j.1567-1364.2006.00157.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Middelhoven WJ, Hoogkamer-Te Niet MC, Kreger-Van Rij NJ. Trichosporon adeninovorans sp. nov., a yeast species utilizing adenine, xanthine, uric acid, putrescine and primary n-alkylamines as the sole source of carbon, nitrogen and energy. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 1984;50:369–378. doi: 10.1007/BF00394651. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Van der Walt JP, Smith MT, Yamada Y. Arxula gen. nov. (Candidaceae), a new anamorphic, arthroconidial yeast genus. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 1990;57:59–61. doi: 10.1007/BF00400338. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Samsonova IA, Kunze G, Bode R, Bottcher F. A set of genetic markers for the chromosomes of the imperfect yeast Arxula adeninivorans. Yeast. 1996;12:1209–1217. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0061(19960930)12:12<1209::AID-YEA12>3.0.CO;2-W. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Rosel H, Kunze G. Integrative transformation of the dimorphic yeast Arxula adeninivorans LS3 based on hygromycin B resistance. Curr Genet. 1998;33:157–163. doi: 10.1007/s002940050322. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Middelhoven WJ, de Jong IM, de Winter M. Arxula adeninivorans, a yeast assimilating many nitrogenous and aromatic compounds. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 1991;59:129–137. doi: 10.1007/BF00445657. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Buttner R, Bode R, Birbaum D. Alcoholic fermentation of starch by Arxula adeninivorans. Zentralbl Mikrobiol. 1992;147:225–230. doi: 10.1016/S0232-4393(11)80333-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Boer E, Schroter A, Bode R, Piontek M, Kunze G. Characterization and expression analysis of a gene cluster for nitrate assimilation from the yeast Arxula adeninivorans. Yeast. 2009;26:83–93. doi: 10.1002/yea.1653. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Robert V, Cardinali G, Casadevall A. Distribution and impact of yeast thermal tolerance permissive for mammalian infection. BMC Biol. 2015;13:18. doi: 10.1186/s12915-015-0127-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Radecka D, Mukherjee V, Mateo RQ, Stojiljkovic M, Foulquie-Moreno MR, Thevelein JM. Looking beyond Saccharomyces: the potential of non-conventional yeast species for desirable traits in bioethanol fermentation. FEMS Yeast Res. 2015;15:fov053. doi: 10.1093/femsyr/fov053. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Wartmann T, Kruger A, Adler K, Duc BM, Kunze I, Kunze G. Temperature-dependent dimorphism of the yeast Arxula adeninivorans Ls3. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 1995;68:215–223. doi: 10.1007/BF00871818. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Bischoff F, Chamas A, Litwinska K, Matthes F, Böer E, Kunze G. Application of Blastobotrys (Arxula) adeninivorans in biotechnology. In: Satyanarayana T, Kunze G, editors. Yeast diversity in human welfare. Singapore: Springer Singapore; 2017. pp. 455–479. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Kunze G, Gaillardin C, Czernicka M, Durrens P, Martin T, Boer E, et al. The complete genome of Blastobotrys (Arxula) adeninivorans LS3—a yeast of biotechnological interest. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2014;7:66. doi: 10.1186/1754-6834-7-66. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Malak A, Baronian K, Kunze G. Blastobotrys (Arxula) adeninivorans: a promising alternative yeast for biotechnology and basic research. Yeast. 2016;33:535–547. doi: 10.1002/yea.3180. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Stockmann C, Scheidle M, Dittrich B, Merckelbach A, Hehmann G, Melmer G, et al. Process development in Hansenula polymorpha and Arxula adeninivorans, a re-assessment. Microb Cell Fact. 2009;8:22. doi: 10.1186/1475-2859-8-22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Maskow T, Rollich A, Fetzer I, Ackermann JU, Harms H. On-line monitoring of lipid storage in yeasts using impedance spectroscopy. J Biotechnol. 2008;135:64–70. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2008.02.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Olstorpe M, Pickova J, Kiessling A, Passoth V. Strain- and temperature-dependent changes of fatty acid composition in Wickerhamomyces anomalus and Blastobotrys adeninivorans. Biotechnol Appl Biochem. 2014;61:45–50. doi: 10.1002/bab.1130. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Adrio JL. Oleaginous yeasts: promising platforms for the production of oleochemicals and biofuels. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2017;114:1915–1920. doi: 10.1002/bit.26337. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Dujon B, Sherman D, Fischer G, Durrens P, Casaregola S, Lafontaine I, et al. Genome evolution in yeasts. Nature. 2004;430:35–44. doi: 10.1038/nature02579. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Kumar S, Kushwaha H, Bachhawat AK, Raghava GP, Ganesan K. Genome sequence of the oleaginous red yeast Rhodosporidium toruloides MTCC 457. Eukaryot Cell. 2012;11:1083–1084. doi: 10.1128/EC.00156-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Riley R, Haridas S, Wolfe KH, Lopes MR, Hittinger CT, Goker M, et al. Comparative genomics of biotechnologically important yeasts. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2016;113:9882–9887. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1603941113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.McNeil BA, Stuart DT. Lipomyces starkeyi: an emerging cell factory for production of lipids, oleochemicals and biotechnology applications. World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2018;34:147. doi: 10.1007/s11274-018-2532-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Sutanto S, Zullaikah S, Tran-Nguyen PL, Ismadji S, Ju Y-H. Lipomyces starkeyi: its current status as a potential oil producer. Fuel Process Technol. 2018;177:39–55. doi: 10.1016/j.fuproc.2018.04.012. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Park Y-K, Nicaud J-M, Ledesma-Amaro R. The engineering potential of Rhodosporidium toruloides as a workhorse for biotechnological applications. Trends Biotechnol. 2018;36:304–317. doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2017.10.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Gong Z, Wang Q, Shen H, Hu C, Jin G, Zhao ZK. Co-fermentation of cellobiose and xylose by Lipomyces starkeyi for lipid production. Bioresour Technol. 2012;117:20–24. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2012.04.063. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Papanikolaou S, Rontou M, Belka A, Athenaki M, Gardeli C, Mallouchos A, et al. Conversion of biodiesel-derived glycerol into biotechnological products of industrial significance by yeast and fungal strains. Eng Life Sci. 2017;17:262–281. doi: 10.1002/elsc.201500191. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Hittinger CT, Rokas A, Bai FY, Boekhout T, Goncalves P, Jeffries TW, et al. Genomics and the making of yeast biodiversity. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2015;35:100–109. doi: 10.1016/j.gde.2015.10.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Michely S, Gaillardin C, Nicaud JM, Neuveglise C. Comparative physiology of oleaginous species from the Yarrowia clade. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e63356. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0063356. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Tai M, Stephanopoulos G. Engineering the push and pull of lipid biosynthesis in oleaginous yeast Yarrowia lipolytica for biofuel production. Metab Eng. 2013;15:1–9. doi: 10.1016/j.ymben.2012.08.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Timoumi A, Guillouet SE, Molina-Jouve C, Fillaudeau L, Gorret N. Impacts of environmental conditions on product formation and morphology of Yarrowia lipolytica. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2018;102:3831–3848. doi: 10.1007/s00253-018-8870-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Rakicka M, Lazar Z, Dulermo T, Fickers P, Nicaud JM. Lipid production by the oleaginous yeast Yarrowia lipolytica using industrial by-products under different culture conditions. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2015;8:104. doi: 10.1186/s13068-015-0286-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Wu C-C, Tsai Y-Y, Ohashi T, Misaki R, Limtong S, Fujiyama K. Isolation of a thermotolerant Rhodosporidium toruloides DMKU3-TK16 mutant and its fatty acid profile at high temperature. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2018;365:fny203. doi: 10.1093/femsle/fny203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Abdel-Banat BMA, Hoshida H, Ano A, Nonklang S, Akada R. High-temperature fermentation: how can processes for ethanol production at high temperatures become superior to the traditional process using mesophilic yeast? Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2010;85:861–867. doi: 10.1007/s00253-009-2248-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Guo Z, Duquesne S, Bozonnet S, Nicaud J-M, Marty A, O’Donohue MJ. Expressing accessory proteins in cellulolytic Yarrowia lipolytica to improve the conversion yield of recalcitrant cellulose. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2017;10:298. doi: 10.1186/s13068-017-0990-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Tansey MR, Brock TD. The upper temperature limit for eukaryotic organisms. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1972;69:2426–2428. doi: 10.1073/pnas.69.9.2426. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Mouchacca J. Heat tolerant fungi and applied research: addition to the previously treated group of strictly thermotolerant species. World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2007;23:1755. doi: 10.1007/s11274-007-9426-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.de Oliveira TB, Gomes E, Rodrigues A. Thermophilic fungi in the new age of fungal taxonomy. Extremophiles. 2015;19:31–37. doi: 10.1007/s00792-014-0707-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Lobs A-K, Schwartz C, Wheeldon I. Genome and metabolic engineering in non-conventional yeasts: current advances and applications. Synth Syst Biotechnol. 2017;2:198–207. doi: 10.1016/j.synbio.2017.08.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Polburee P, Yongmanitchai W, Lertwattanasakul N, Ohashi T, Fujiyama K, Limtong S. Characterization of oleaginous yeasts accumulating high levels of lipid when cultivated in glycerol and their potential for lipid production from biodiesel-derived crude glycerol. Fungal Biol. 2015;119:1194–1204. doi: 10.1016/j.funbio.2015.09.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Sitepu IR, Sestric R, Ignatia L, Levin D, German JB, Gillies LA, et al. Manipulation of culture conditions alters lipid content and fatty acid profiles of a wide variety of known and new oleaginous yeast species. Bioresour Technol. 2013;144:360–369. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2013.06.047. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Gientka I, Kieliszek M, Jermacz K, Blazejak S. Identification and characterization of oleaginous yeast isolated from kefir and its ability to accumulate intracellular fats in deproteinated potato wastewater with different carbon sources. Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:6061042. doi: 10.1155/2017/6061042. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Cernak P, Estrela R, Poddar S, Skerker JM, Cheng Y-F, Carlson AK, et al. Engineering Kluyveromyces marxianus as a robust synthetic biology platform host. mBio. 2018;9:e01410–e01418. doi: 10.1128/mBio.01410-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Beopoulos A, Cescut J, Haddouche R, Uribelarrea JL, Molina-Jouve C, Nicaud JM. Yarrowia lipolytica as a model for bio-oil production. Prog Lipid Res. 2009;48:375–387. doi: 10.1016/j.plipres.2009.08.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Ratledge C. Regulation of lipid accumulation in oleaginous micro-organisms. Biochem Soc Trans. 2002;30:1047–1050. doi: 10.1042/bst0301047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Beopoulos A, Nicaud JM, Gaillardin C. An overview of lipid metabolism in yeasts and its impact on biotechnological processes. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2011;90:1193–1206. doi: 10.1007/s00253-011-3212-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Boulton CA, Ratledge C. Correlation of lipid accumulation in yeasts with possession of ATP:citrate lyase. J Gen Microbiol. 1981;127:169–176. [Google Scholar]
- 47.Vorapreeda T, Thammarongtham C, Cheevadhanarak S, Laoteng K. Alternative routes of acetyl-CoA synthesis identified by comparative genomic analysis: involvement in the lipid production of oleaginous yeast and fungi. Microbiology. 2012;158:217–228. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.051946-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Dulermo R, Gamboa-Melendez H, Ledesma-Amaro R, Thevenieau F, Nicaud JM. Yarrowia lipolytica AAL genes are involved in peroxisomal fatty acid activation. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2016;1861:555–565. doi: 10.1016/j.bbalip.2016.04.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Liang MH, Jiang JG. Advancing oleaginous microorganisms to produce lipid via metabolic engineering technology. Prog Lipid Res. 2013;52:395–408. doi: 10.1016/j.plipres.2013.05.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Athenstaedt K. YALI0E32769g (DGA1) and YALI0E16797g (LRO1) encode major triacylglycerol synthases of the oleaginous yeast Yarrowia lipolytica. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2011;1811:587–596. doi: 10.1016/j.bbalip.2011.07.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Beopoulos A, Haddouche R, Kabran P, Dulermo T, Chardot T, Nicaud JM. Identification and characterization of DGA2, an acyltransferase of the DGAT1 acyl-CoA:diacylglycerol acyltransferase family in the oleaginous yeast Yarrowia lipolytica. New insights into the storage lipid metabolism of oleaginous yeasts. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2012;93:1523–1537. doi: 10.1007/s00253-011-3506-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Zhang H, Damude HG, Yadav NS. Three diacylglycerol acyltransferases contribute to oil biosynthesis and normal growth in Yarrowia lipolytica. Yeast Chichester Engl. 2012;29:25–38. doi: 10.1002/yea.1914. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Brevnova EE, Shaw AJI, Van Diken JP. Increasing lipid production and optimizing lipid composition. Cambridge: Novogy, Inc.; 2015. [Google Scholar]
- 54.Kunze G, Kunze I. Characterization of Arxula adeninivorans strains from different habitats. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 1994;65:29–34. doi: 10.1007/BF00878276. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Weiss S, Samson F, Navarro D, Casaregola S. YeastIP: a database for identification and phylogeny of Saccharomycotina yeasts. FEMS Yeast Res. 2013;13:117–125. doi: 10.1111/1567-1364.12017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Klein M, Swinnen S, Thevelein JM, Nevoigt E. Glycerol metabolism and transport in yeast and fungi: established knowledge and ambiguities. Environ Microbiol. 2017;19:878–893. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.13617. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Workman M, Holt P, Thykaer J. Comparing cellular performance of Yarrowia lipolytica during growth on glucose and glycerol in submerged cultivations. AMB Express. 2013;3:58. doi: 10.1186/2191-0855-3-58. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Bommareddy RR, Sabra W, Maheshwari G, Zeng A-P. Metabolic network analysis and experimental study of lipid production in Rhodosporidium toruloides grown on single and mixed substrates. Microb Cell Fact. 2015;14:36. doi: 10.1186/s12934-015-0217-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Ledesma-Amaro R, Lazar Z, Rakicka M, Guo Z, Fouchard F, Crutz-Le Coq A-M, et al. Metabolic engineering of Yarrowia lipolytica to produce chemicals and fuels from xylose. Metab Eng. 2016;38:115–124. doi: 10.1016/j.ymben.2016.07.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Bharathiraja B, Sridharan S, Sowmya V, Yuvaraj D, Praveenkumar R. Microbial oil—a plausible alternate resource for food and fuel application. Bioresour Technol. 2017;233:423–432. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2017.03.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Li Q, Du W, Liu D. Perspectives of microbial oils for biodiesel production. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2008;80:749–756. doi: 10.1007/s00253-008-1625-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Froissard M, Canonge M, Pouteaux M, Cintrat B, Mohand-Oumoussa S, Guillouet SE, et al. Lipids containing medium-chain fatty acids are specific to post-whole genome duplication Saccharomycotina yeasts. BMC Evol Biol. 2015;15:97. doi: 10.1186/s12862-015-0369-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Amara S, Seghezzi N, Otani H, Diaz-Salazar C, Liu J, Eltis LD. Characterization of key triacylglycerol biosynthesis processes in rhodococci. Sci Rep. 2016;6:24985. doi: 10.1038/srep24985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Matatkova O, Gharwalova L, Zimola M, Rezanka T, Masak J, Kolouchova I. Using odd-alkanes as a carbon source to increase the content of nutritionally important fatty acids in Candida krusei, Trichosporon cutaneum, and Yarrowia lipolytica. Int J Anal Chem. 2017;2017:8195329. doi: 10.1155/2017/8195329. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Rezanka T, Kolouchova I, Sigler K. Precursor directed biosynthesis of odd-numbered fatty acids by different yeasts. Folia Microbiol. 2015;60:457–464. doi: 10.1007/s12223-015-0388-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Yun EJ, Lee J, Kim DH, Kim J, Kim S, Jin Y-S, et al. Metabolomic elucidation of the effects of media and carbon sources on fatty acid production by Yarrowia lipolytica. J Biotechnol. 2018;272–273:7–13. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2018.02.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Suutari M, Liukkonen K, Laakso S. Temperature adaptation in yeasts: the role of fatty acids. J Gen Microbiol. 1990;136:1469–1474. doi: 10.1099/00221287-136-8-1469. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Rossi M, Buzzini P, Cordisco L, Amaretti A, Sala M, Raimondi S, et al. Growth, lipid accumulation, and fatty acid composition in obligate psychrophilic, facultative psychrophilic, and mesophilic yeasts. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2009;69:363–372. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2009.00727.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Arthur H, Watson K. Thermal adaptation in yeast: growth temperatures, membrane lipid, and cytochrome composition of psychrophilic, mesophilic, and thermophilic yeasts. J Bacteriol. 1976;128:56–68. doi: 10.1128/jb.128.1.56-68.1976. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Suutari M, Rintamaki A, Laakso S. The effect of temperature on lipid classes and their fatty acid profiles in Lipomyces starkeyi. J Am Oil Chem Soc. 1996;73:1071–1073. doi: 10.1007/BF02523419. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Suutari M, Rintamaki A, Laakso S. Membrane phospholipids in temperature adaptation of Candida utilis: alterations in fatty acid chain length and unsaturation. J Lipid Res. 1997;38:790–794. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Lazar Z, Dulermo T, Neuveglise C, Crutz-Le Coq AM, Nicaud JM. Hexokinase—a limiting factor in lipid production from fructose in Yarrowia lipolytica. Metab Eng. 2014;26:89–99. doi: 10.1016/j.ymben.2014.09.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Nguyen H-V, Gaillardin C, Neuveglise C. Differentiation of Debaryomyces hansenii and Candida famata by rRNA gene intergenic spacer fingerprinting and reassessment of phylogenetic relationships among D. hansenii, C. famata, D. fabryi, C. flareri (= D. subglobosus) and D. prosopidis: description of D. vietnamensis sp. nov. closely related to D. nepalensis. FEMS Yeast Res. 2009;9:641–662. doi: 10.1111/j.1567-1364.2009.00510.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Cornet M, Sendid B, Fradin C, Gaillardin C, Poulain D, Nguyen H-V. Molecular identification of closely related Candida species using two ribosomal intergenic spacer fingerprinting methods. J Mol Diagn JMD. 2011;13:12–22. doi: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2010.11.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Nguyen H-V, Boekhout T. Characterization of Saccharomyces uvarum (Beijerinck, 1898) and related hybrids: assessment of molecular markers that predict the parent and hybrid genomes and a proposal to name yeast hybrids. FEMS Yeast Res. 2017;17:fox014. doi: 10.1093/femsyr/fox014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Larkin MA, Blackshields G, Brown NP, Chenna R, McGettigan PA, McWilliam H, et al. Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0. Bioinformatics. 2007;23:2947–2948. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Neuvéglise C, Devillers H. Genome resources for yeast chromosomes. http://gryc.inra.fr. Accessed 9 May 2019.
- 78.Dulermo R, Gamboa-Melendez H, Dulermo T, Thevenieau F, Nicaud JM. The fatty acid transport protein Fat1p is involved in the export of fatty acids from lipid bodies in Yarrowia lipolytica. FEMS Yeast Res. 2014;14:883–896. doi: 10.1111/1567-1364.12177. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Browse J, McCourt PJ, Somerville CR. Fatty acid composition of leaf lipids determined after combined digestion and fatty acid methyl ester formation from fresh tissue. Anal Biochem. 1986;152:141–145. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(86)90132-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Siegel S, Castellan NJ. Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral science. 2. New York: McGraw-Hill Inc.; 1988. [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article and its additional files.