Abstract
Larval crowding is one of the abiotic factors affecting biological fitness in mosquitoes. This study aims at elucidating, quantitatively, the influence of more larval crowding on aspects of fitness in Culex quinquefasciatus mosquito. To this end, day-old larvae of the species were reared in 4 density regimens equivalent to 1 larva in 1.25, 2.5, 5, and 10 mL of distilled water. Developmental indices, adult fitness indices, and accumulation and utilisation of teneral reserves for metamorphosis were determined at these density regimens. The results revealed varying significant negative effects of larval density on all fitness indices measured for the species. The study also revealed high utilisation of teneral reserves for metamorphosis at high larval densities. The information generated will be useful in making informed-decisions in allocating scare resources for vector control, although field trials are advocated to establish these laboratory findings.
Keywords: biological fitness, development, survivorship
Introduction
Lymphatic filariasis is a disease of the lymphatic system. The disease is caused by infection with thread-like nematode worms transmitted through bites from infected mosquitoes, principally, Culex quinquefasciatus.1 Control of the disease remains elusive, despite the use of chemotherapy. Hence, the World Health Organization (WHO) recommended mosquito-vector control as a supplemental strategy for eliminating the disease.2,3 However, effective mosquito-vector control must be predicated on an adequate knowledge of the ecophysiology of the vector species. Ecological interaction among immature mosquitoes is of particular importance as they affect egg hatching,4 competition, and abundance.5,6
One of such ecological factors is larval crowding. Although there exist an avalanche of literature on the influence of larval crowding on the life cycle of insects,7–19 this information is species-specific20 and cannot be generalised to all mosquito species.21 There is, therefore, need for detailed species-based ecological studies for understanding species-specific interactions for effective integration into control strategies.
In nature, the gravid female C quinquefasciatus are capable of exploiting most available water body for egg-laying, eg, drainages, rice fields, swamps, gutters, and rain pools for laying eggs.22 These gravid females ensure optimal development and survivorship of the immatures by actively searching for and selecting nutrient-rich and productive habitats.23 Presence of conspecifics,24 semiochemicals from previously hatched-out larvae,25 chemicals from decaying organic matters,26,27 predators,28 mineral salts,29 water surface tension,30 and quality and quantity of larval habitat31 are some examples of cues, which the females depend on for oviposition site selection.
These conditions determine the attractiveness of larval habitats to the gravid females, and degree of egg rafts oviposition, and, hence, their relative productivity (ie, in terms of density of immature life stages). Female C quinquefasciatus mosquitoes lay an average of 30 to 350 eggs/raft; these eggs have high fertility, hatchability, and immature survival rates.32,33 Therefore, with favourable oviposition attractants and immature breeding conditions, there is likelihood for increased larval density in the mosquito population and, often, competition for limited resources and space.34
Although there is the potential health implication of high mosquito larval density,35–37 there is need to answer the question ‘Does high mosquito population density constitute epidemiological threat?’ This study, therefore, attempts to quantitatively elucidate the impacts of such crowded conditions on developmental and adult fitness indices, and how these affect teneral reserve mobilisation and utilisation in C quinquefasciatus mosquito. Some adult fitness indices include duration of development (DD), immature survivorship, adult emergence success, daily survivorship, longevity, and teneral reserve. Teneral reserves, for example, determine the amount of energy available for most adult life traits such as body size, longevity, vitellogenesis, and flight.38–40
Therefore, this study aims at elucidating the influence of varying density regimen on these indices of fitness of the species. The information generated in this study will be important in developing efficient control protocols for cost-effective deployment of resources for control of the vector.
Materials and Methods
Duration of study
The study was carried out at the Entomology Unit of the Department of Animal Biology, Federal University of Technology, Minna, Nigeria. The study was carried out between May 2017 and April 2018.
Culture of experimental mosquito
Freshly laid egg rafts of C quinquefasciatus were collected from an established colony of mosquitoes in the Insectary Unit of the Department of Animal Biology, Federal University of Technology, Minna, Nigeria. These were placed in transparent plastic hatching trays and incubated for 24 hours at ambient room temperature. Hatched larvae were cultured at rates equivalent to simulated larval density regimens in plastic trays following standard techniques.41 The larvae were fed with fish feed (Coppens®) at the rate of 0.32 mg/100 larvae which was sprinkled daily on the water surface. Excessive feed was removed using pipette to avoid mould formation. Water from the culture bowls were changed daily until pupation to prevent formation of scum. The pupae were collected in small bowls and placed in adult-holding cages for emergence. Emerged adults were maintained in the holding cages, and fed 10% sucrose solution soaked in clean cotton balls as described by Olayemi and Ande.42 Prevailing laboratory conditions during experimentation were 28.00 ± 2.00°C, 86.00%, and 12:12 (light:dark hours), respectively, for temperature, relative humidity, and photoperiod.
Simulation of larval density regimens
Different mosquito larval densities were simulated according to the methods described by Takken et al,13 though with slight modification. Briefly, 4 density regimens were adopted, namely, 50, 100, 200, and 400 larvae/500 mL of water to produce densities of 1 larva per 10.0, 5.0, 2.5, and 1.25 mL of distilled water, respectively. Each density regimen had 5 replicates. The entire experimental setup was repeated immediately after the first, resulting in 2 rounds of experimentation and 10 replicates.
Determination of entomological variables
Developmental indices
Duration (days) of development of larval instars (LI-IV) and immature life stages (average larval and pupal) were estimated as the time spent by the instar or life stage before entering the next. Survival rates of immature instars and life stages were determined as the percentage of mosquitoes at the beginning of a life instar or stage that successfully entered the next stage.33 Larval growth rates (GR) were determined as average daily weight gain by the larvae during development. It was expressed as a ratio of weight at eclosion to age at pupation.43 The weight of the mosquitoes was determined using electrical weighing balance (Model: JA303P) with sensitivity (of readability) of 0.001 g. Mean GRs were used for statistical analysis.
Adult success indices
Adult emergence success involved counting of the numbers of adult mosquitoes that successfully eclosed and expressing it as a percentage of the total larvae at start. The ratio of live adults to total adults on the preceding day was used to estimate daily adult survivorship, while post-emergence longevity was estimated as the number of days the adult mosquito spent post-emergence, while fed sugar solution.33 Adult values are mean of male and female mosquito values.
Mosquito biochemical analyses
Mobilisation of teneral reserves (lipid, glycogen, glucose, and protein) at larval instars (LI-IV) and life stages (larval, pupal, and adult) were carried out as described by Van-Handel,44,45 Van-Handel and Day,46 and Kaufmann and Brown47 and reported by Ukubuiwe et al.48 Rates of teneral components accumulation were determined as the ratio of teneral components at terminal (fourth) larval instar and age at pupation and expressed in mg/component/day. All biochemical analyses were done in triplicates. Metabolic reserves for the processes of pupation and eclosion were estimated, respectively, as the difference between teneral reserve components at terminal larval instar and pupal stage, and between the pupal and adult stages.
Data analysis
All data generated in the study were processed into means and standard deviation using Microsoft Office Excel 2016 and IBM SPSS (Statistical Package for Social Science) Version 23. Differences in mean values of entomologic variables among density regimens were compared for significance difference using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) as appropriate. All decisions on statistical comparison of means were taken at P = .05 level of significance. The means were separated using Duncan Multiple Range Test (DMRT).
Results
Effects of larval density on duration of immature development and larval GR of C quinquefasciatus mosquito
The effects of larval density on DD and GR of C quinquefasciatus are shown in Figure 1 and Table 1. Analyses revealed significant (P < .05) negative effects of increased density on these entomo variables.
Figure 1.
Effects of rearing density on duration of development of Culex quinquefasciatus mosquito larvae. Bars with same letter are not significantly different (P < .05) according to analysis of variance. Values are expressed as mean ± SD.
Table 1.
Effects of larval density on duration (days) of development and larval growth rate (mg/day) of Culex quinquefasciatus mosquito.
| Density regimen (larva: mL) | Total larval duration | Pupal stage duration | Total immature duration | Growth rate (mg/day) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1: 1.25 | 17.99 ± 0.11d | 1.39 ± 0.89c | 19.38 ± 0.17d | 0.0278 ± 0.0002a |
| 1: 2.5 | 14.68 ± 0.15c | 1.33 ± 0.14c | 16.11 ± 0.21c | 0.0341 ± 0.0004b |
| 1: 5 | 11.27 ± 0.28b | 1.28 ± 0.14b | 12.55 ± 0.36b | 0.0444 ± 0.0011c |
| 1: 10 | 8.72 ± 0.50a | 0.96 ± 0.31a | 9.68 ± 0.69a | 0.0575 ± 0.0035d |
Values followed by same superscript alphabet in a column are not significantly (P < .05) different. All values are expressed as mean ± SD of mean.
There were variations in DD among the larval instars at different density, especially at the fourth larval instar (LIV) (Figure 1). Meanwhile, mosquito larvae reared at 1 larva/1.25 mL had the most delayed development time (17.99 ± 0.11 days), while those reared at 1 larva/10 mL developed fastest (8.72 ± 0.50 days) (Table 1).
Time taken till eclosion (ie, total immature DD) was significantly (P = .018) prolonged as rearing density increased, with mosquitoes reared at 1 larva/1.25 mL spending the longest time as immature (19.38 ± 0.17 days). GR significantly (P = .00) reduced with increasing density, exhibiting an inverse relationship (Table 1).
Effects of larval density on immature survivorship in C quinquefasciatus mosquito
The impacts of larval density on survivorship of immature life stages of C quinquefasciatus mosquitoes are shown in Figure 2 and Table 2. Generally, survivorship of immature life stages of the species exhibited a negative relationship with rearing density. Increasing density resulted in significant reduction in survivorship, with mosquitoes reared at 1 larva/1.25 mL having the lowest survivorship (<40% at LIV) (Figure 2).
Figure 2.
Effects of rearing density on survivorship of Culex quinquefasciatus mosquito larvae. Bars with same letter are not significantly different (P < .05) according to analysis of variance. Values are expressed as mean ± SD.
Table 2.
Effects of larval density on survivorship (%) of immature stages of Culex quinquefasciatus mosquito.
| Density regimen (larva: mL) | Average larval survivorship | Pupal stage survivorship | Average immature survivorship |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1: 1.25 | 54.40 ± 5.40a | 68.30 ± 9.05a | 65.18 ± 4.39a |
| 1: 2.5 | 76.73 ± 4.46b | 81.16 ± 6.55b | 87.62 ± 4.46b |
| 1: 5 | 91.31 ± 3.92c | 98.34 ± 2.09c | 94.72 ± 2.92c |
| 1: 10 | 96.88 ± 0.89c | 98.36 ± 2.30c | 97.17 ± 0.43c |
Values followed by same superscript alphabet in a column are not significantly (P < .05) different. All values are expressed as mean ± SD of mean.
There were no significant (P = .00) differences in immature (larval and pupal) survivorship of the species across the different density regimen. Furthermore, average immature survivorship was lowest at 1 larva/1.25 mL (65.18% ± 4.39%) and highest at 1 larva/10 mL (97.17% ± 0.43%) (Table 2).
Effects of larval density on emergence success, survivorship, and longevity of adult C quinquefasciatus
Adult emergence success, survivorship, and longevity of adult C quinquefasciatus are significantly affected by larval density (Table 3). Adult emergence success varied significantly (df = 3, P = .01) across the density regimens, ranging from 42.19% ± 2.58% to 76.50% ± 10.94% at 1 larva/1.25 mL and 1 larva/10 mL, respectively.
Table 3.
Effects of larval density on emergence success, survivorship, and longevity of imaginal life stage of Culex quinquefasciatus.
| Density regimen (larva: mL) | Emergence success of adult (%)* | Daily survivorship of imagines (%)* | Post-emergence longevity (days)* |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1: 1.25 | 42.19 ± 2.58a | 62.08 ± 6.81a | 3.63 ± 0.36a |
| 1: 2.5 | 49.00 ± 12.94b | 69.51 ± 3.50b | 5.74 ± 0.58b |
| 1: 5 | 70.50 ± 13.97c | 74.01 ± 5.01c | 11.25 ± 1.12c |
| 1: 10 | 76.50 ± 10.94d | 75.00 ± 5.57c | 13.45 ± 0.30d |
Values followed by same superscript alphabet in a column of a parameter are not significantly (P < .05) different. All values are expressed as mean ± SD of mean.
Adult values are mean of male and female mosquito values.
Mosquitoes reared at 1 larva/10 mL had the highest (75.00% ± 5.57%) daily adult survivorship, while those reared at 1 larva/1.25 mL had the lowest (62.08% ± 6.81%). Post-emergence longevity also followed a similar trend as daily adult survivorship (Table 3).
Effects of rearing density on teneral composition across life stages of C quinquefasciatus
Lipid composition
Analyses revealed significant effects of rearing density on mobilisation of lipid across the life stages of C quinquefasciatus mosquito (Table 4 and Figure 3). As larval density increased progressively, there was a significant (P = .00) decrease in the quantity of lipid across the life stages and within a life stage. Furthermore, irrespective of density regimen, there was a significant (df = 4, P < .05) progressive increase in larval stages’ accumulation of lipid as the larvae progressed from LI through to LIV (Figure 3). However, the quantity accumulated was dependent on density regimen. Pupal values reduced significantly as it progressed to the adult stage (Table 4).
Table 4.
Effects of larval rearing density on life stages’ composition and larval accumulation rates of lipid in Culex quinquefasciatus mosquito.
| Density regimen (larva: mL) | Pupae (µg lipid/pupa) | Adult (µg lipid/adult)* | Larval accumulation rate (µg lipid/larva/day) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1: 1.25 | 12.06 ± 0.07a | 9.69 ± 0.33a | 0.87 ± 0.03a |
| 1: 2.5 | 16.05 ± 0.24b | 12.39 ± 0.52b | 1.44 ± 0.07b |
| 1: 5 | 18.11 ± 0.31c | 16.42 ± 2.01c | 1.98 ± 0.05c |
| 1: 10 | 25.20 ± 0.45d | 22.18 ± 0.78d | 3.27 ± 0.21d |
Values followed by same superscript alphabet in a column are not significantly (P < .05) different. All values are expressed as mean ± SD of mean.
Adult values are mean values of male and female lipid composition.
Figure 3.
Effects of rearing density on lipid accumulation in larval instars of Culex quinquefasciatus mosquito. Bars with same letter are not significantly different (P < .05) according to analysis of variance. Values are expressed as mean ± SD.
The rate of accumulation of lipid in the larval stages varied significantly among the mosquitoes, being lowest at 1 larva/1.25 mL (0.87 ± 0.03 µg lipid/mosquito/day) and highest at 1 larva/10 mL (3.27 ± 0.21 µg lipid/mosquito/day) (Table 4).
Glucose composition
The effects of larval density on glucose composition in C quinquefasciatus mosquito are shown in Figure 4 and Table 5. Analyses revealed a significant (df = 4, P = .013) negative effects of density on the glucose composition across all life stages; as larval density increased, the quantities accumulated by each life stage decreased significantly (Figure 4).
Figure 4.
Effects of rearing density on glucose accumulation in larval instars of C quinquefasciatus mosquito. Bars with same letter are not significantly different (P < .05) according to analysis of variance. Values are expressed as mean ± SD.
Table 5.
Effects of larval rearing density on life stages’ composition and larval accumulation rates of glucose in Culex quinquefasciatus mosquito.
| Density regimen (larva: mL) | Pupae (µg glucose/pupa) | Adult (µg glucose/adult)* | Larval accumulation rate (µg glucose/larva/day) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1: 1.25 | 7.56 ± 0.48a | 5.55 ± 0.39a | 0.57 ± 0.01a |
| 1: 2.5 | 9.85 ± 0.67b | 7.91 ± 0.43b | 0.85 ± 0.03b |
| 1: 5 | 14.34 ± 0.73c | 13.25 ± 0.25c | 1.44 ± 0.07c |
| 1: 10 | 17.27 ± 0.07d | 15.44 ± 0.28d | 2.22 ± 0.14d |
Values followed by same superscript alphabet in a column are not significantly (P < .05) different. All values are expressed as mean ± SD of mean.
Adult values are mean values of male and female lipid composition.
Generally, there was a significant (df = 4, P < .05) increase in glucose content as larvae progressed from LI to LIV. These values reduced significantly (P < .05) at later life stages (ie, pupae and adults). Furthermore, as density increased, larval rate of accumulation of glucose significantly (P < .05) reduced, ranging from 0.57 ± 0.01 µg glucose/mosquito/day at 1 larva/1.25 mL to 3.27 ± 0.21 µg glucose/mosquito/day at 1 larva/10 mL (Table 5).
Glycogen composition
Analyses revealed a similar trend in glucose composition as in lipid and glucose composition (Figure 5; Table 6). Progression through larval instars was associated with increasing glycogen content; this, however, reduced at pupal and adult stages. Pupae and adult mosquitoes from density treatment of 1 larva: 10 mL had the highest glycogen contents (44.72 ± 0.37 µg glycogen/pupa and 42.91 ± 2.30 µg glycogen/adult, respectively), with the highest larval daily accumulation rate (5.45 ± 0.37 µg glycogen/larva/day) (Table 6).
Figure 5.
Effects of rearing density on glycogen accumulation in larval instars of Culex quinquefasciatus mosquito. Bars with same letter are not significantly different (P < .05) according to analysis of variance. Values are expressed as mean ± SD.
Table 6.
Effects of larval rearing density on life stages’ composition and larval accumulation rates of glycogen in Culex quinquefasciatus mosquito.
| Density regimen (larva: mL) | Pupae (µg glycogen/pupa) | Adult (µg glycogen/adult)* | Larval accumulation rate (µg glycogen/larva/day) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1: 1.25 | 26.21 ± 0.12a | 22.86 ± 1.72a | 1.88 ± 0.92a |
| 1: 2.5 | 31.22 ± 0.46b | 27.97 ± 2.60b | 2.66 ± 0.07b |
| 1: 5 | 38.10 ± 2.42c | 33.52 ± 0.55c | 3.90 ± 0.16c |
| 1: 10 | 44.72 ± 0.37d | 42.91 ± 2.30d | 5.45 ± 0.37d |
Values followed by same superscript alphabet in a column are not significantly (P < .05) different. All values are expressed as mean ± SD of mean.
Adult values are mean values of male and female lipid composition.
Protein composition
Increase in larval density significantly (df = 4, P < .05) reduced the quantity of protein accumulated at all life stages of C quinquefasciatus mosquito (Figure 6; Table 7). At all larval density treatment, earlier larval instars of the species had significantly lower protein contents than the succeeding instar (Figure 6), and adult life stage, consistently, had lower protein content than the pupal stage (Table 7).
Figure 6.
Effects of rearing density on protein accumulation in larval stages of Culex quinquefasciatus mosquito. Bars with same letter are not significantly different at P < .05 according to analysis of variance. Values are expressed as mean ± SD.
Table 7.
Effects of larval rearing density on life stages’ composition and larval accumulation rates of protein in Culex quinquefasciatus mosquito.
| Density regimen (larva: mL) | Pupae (µg protein/pupa) | Adult (µg protein/adult)* | Larval accumulation rate (µg protein/larva/day) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1: 1.25 | 24.60 ± 0.37a | 20.00 ± 2.14a | 1.83 ± 0.03a |
| 1: 2.5 | 29.58 ± 0.08b | 24.76 ± 1.37b | 2.79 ± 0.06b |
| 1: 5 | 39.11 ± 0.76c | 35.77 ± 0.60c | 3.79 ± 0.08c |
| 1: 10 | 42.58 ± 2.27d | 41.28 ± 1.18d | 5.34 ± 0.33d |
Values followed by same superscript alphabet in a column are not significantly different (P < .05). All values are expressed as mean ± SD of mean.
Adult values are mean values of male and female lipid composition.
The rate of larval accumulation in the species was highest (5.34 ± 0.33 µg protein/mosquito/day) at the lowest density (ie, 1 larva/10 mL) and lowest (1.83 ± 0.03 µg protein/mosquito/day) at the highest density (ie, 1 larva/1.25 mL).
Effects of rearing density metabolic reserve for pupation and eclosion of C quinquefasciatus mosquitoes
The effects of larval density on metabolic reserve (lipid, protein, glycogen, and glucose) for pupation and eclosion in C quinquefasciatus are highlighted in Table 8. Generally, the mosquito species required more teneral components for pupation than for eclosion.
Table 8.
Effects of larval density on teneral reserve components (µg nutrient/mosquito) for pupation and eclosion in Culex quinquefasciatus mosquito.
| Density regimen (larva: mL) | Lipid | Protein | Glycogen | Glucose | Aggregate | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| pupation | eclosion | pupation | eclosion | pupation | eclosion | pupation | eclosion | pupation | eclosion | |
| 1:1.25 | 3.59 ± 0.42ab*b** | 2.37 ± 0.39bb | 13.56 ± 5.51cd | 4.60 ± 1.77cc | 7.65 ± 0.73cc | 4.58 ± 2.97cc | 2.73 ± 0.23ba | 2.01 ± 0.38ca | 27.53 ± 6.89b | 13.56 ± 5.51b |
| 1:2.5 | 5.05 ± 1.07cb | 3.66 ± 0.76db | 13.68 ± 5.21cd | 4.83 ± 1.30dc | 7.83 ± 1.21cc | 3.25 ± 2.14bb | 2.60 ± 0.91ba | 1.94 ± 1.01ba | 29.16 ± 8.40b | 13.68 ± 5.21b |
| 1:5 | 4.29 ± 0.29bb | 1.69 ± 2.32aa | 10.22 ± 4.65bd | 3.34 ± 0.16bb | 6.08 ± 1.81bc | 3.36 ± 1.84bb | 1.93 ± 0.57aba | 1.83 ± 0.33aba | 22.52 ± 7.32b | 10.22 ± 4.65a |
| 1:10 | 2.72 ± 1.30ab | 3.02 ± 1.23cc | 7.22 ± 5.40ac | 1.30 ± 1.09aab | 1.87 ± 0.12aa | 1.81 ± 2.16ab | 1.67 ± 0.62aa | 1.09 ± 0.92aa | 13.48 ± 7.44a | 7.22 ± 5.40a |
Values followed by same superscript alphabet in a column are not significantly different (P < .05). Values followed by same subscript alphabet in a row (among teneral components of a process) are not significantly different at P < .05. All values are expressed as mean ± SD of mean.
Higher larval densities utilised more protein, glycogen, and glucose contents for pupation. The total quantities and teneral components utilised for pupation varied significantly (df = 4, P = .00) among larvae from the different larval-density regimens. At the highest density (1 larva: 1.25 mL), the mosquito species expended more teneral components (13.56 ± 5.51 µg nutrient/mosquito) for eclosion than at lower density (1 larva: 10 mL; 7.22 ± 5.40 µg nutrient/mosquito) (Table 8).
Discussion
Effects of larval density on duration and larval GR of C quinquefasciatus mosquito
This study revealed significant negative impacts of increasing larval density on immature developmental times (ie, DD) and larval daily weight gain (ie, GRs) of C quinquefasciatus mosquito. For example, as density increased, from 1 larva/1.25 mL to 1 larva/10 mL, there was general delay in DD in the larval instars and pupae.
In field studies, high relative density of immature life stages of the species within a habitat have been correlated with increased adult mosquito population within a specified time, with the implication of increased disease transmission tendency.36,37 This study, although laboratory based, revealed that this increase in density within confined water space significantly delays the mosquito species’ development time. A condition that may portend reduction in vector-human contacts, resulting from low adult emergence per unit time, and leading to decreased frequency of bites, hence, reduced transmission of pathogens. Field experimentations are, however, required to authenticate this observation.
Generally, in quantitative terms, mosquito cohorts reared at a density of 1 larva/1.25 mL spent about twice the time for those at 1 larva/10 mL to complete immature development. Among instars, LI mosquitoes reared at 1 larva/1.25 mL spent about 1.4 times the time spent by their counterparts at 1 larva/10 mL. LII, LIII, LIV, and pupae at the former density spent 2.2, 2, 2.4, and 1.5 times the time spent by the latter. These observations are very significant in epidemiology of disease vectored by this species (C quinquefasciatus), as time spent in development determines vectorial efficiency of adult mosquito.49
The prolonged larval and pupal development times of C quinquefasciatus at higher density observed in this study may be attributed to, but not limited to, crowding-related stress conditions, such as general increase in body sizes with age, suppressed GRs (due to inadequate feed intake as a result of competition among the larvae), production of growth retardant chemicals, ie, growth retardant factor (GRF), and increased metabolic wastes production50 which disrupt growth. More so, the delay could have been necessitated by the physiological need to attain threshold size for ecdysis and metamorphosis and accumulate teneral reserves for effective adult life.51,52 The role of increased larval density in increasing DD has been reported in other C species: C pipiens quinquefasciatus,6 C quinquefasciatus,53 C tarsalis,54 C tritaeniorhynchus,55 and other mosquito genera.15,56 Although, in other insects, overcrowding elicits shorter development times.57–59
Effects of larval density on survivorship of immature stages of C quinquefasciatus mosquito
In this study, survivorship of immature stages of C quinquefasciatus were, significantly, affected by density. Larvae and pupae mosquito cohorts reared at the lowest density regimen (1 larva/10 mL) had the highest survivorship, while those at the highest density (1 larva/1.25 mL) had the lowest. There were, however, no difference in survivorship among larvae and pupae reared at 1 larva/10 mL and 1 larva/5 mL. Earlier studies by Suleman53 on the species and Hooper et al16 and Hirschberger60 reported similar observations (ie, significant reduction in immature survivorship due to larval crowding) on other insect species.
The results from this study revealed evidence of developmental challenges by larvae of C quinquefasciatus in crowded environment (in terms of survivorship). Earlier field studies have revealed that gravid female of the mosquito36,37 and other species in the genus, C restuans31 and C sitiens61 actively, search for habitats with conspecifics (a cue that suggests suitability for immature development); this tendency may result in overcrowded conditions (especially if the habitat is confined), which may result in reduced survivorship. Although there had been no report of ‘avoidance’ strategy by the species, Gimnig et al15 reported that Anopheles mosquitoes avoid ovipositing in such confined crowded habitats, to avoid competition and predation.
Although the present data were generated from simulated crowded conditions, it suggests that C quinquefasciatus at high juvenile mortality is elicited at density greater than 1 larva/5 mL. This information could be deployed in developing cost-effective mosquito control protocols and in monitoring mosquito population outburst. Although subject to field trials, and information on larval density, habitat size, and volume of water, C quinquefasciatus mosquito in the wild from densely populated larval habitats may have lower survivorship, than in sparsely populated habitats.
Effects of larval density on emergence success, daily survivorship, and longevity of adult C quinquefasciatus mosquito
This study revealed significant negative effects of high larval density on number of emergent adults, daily survivorship, and post-emergence longevity of adult C quinquefasciatus mosquitoes. These entomological variables reduced, significantly, as density increased from 1 larva/10 mL to 1 larva/1.25 mL, and may have been elicited by the overcrowding experienced during immature life stage development of the species. Earlier, Roberts and Kokkinn50 and Costanzo et al62 opined that overcrowding in C quinquefasciatus and C pipiens is linked with competition. This results in modified foraging behaviour due to food and nutrient shortage, and exposure to and accumulation of waste products, which negatively affect adult survivorship.38,50,61
Although the biology of Culex species differs from those of other genera (Anopheles and Aedes), similar diminishing eclosion rates with increase in larval density have been reported.10,63–65 Meanwhile, success at emergence has been positively correlated with increased vector-human contact,66 while adult survivorship ensures, among others, foraging and mating successes,67 and longevity ensures development of pathogen within the mosquito and sucessess at pathogen transmission.68
This study provides further information on the influence of larval density on adult success traits of C quinquefascatus mosquito and, hence, capacity to transmit diseases. For example, the result revealed that at the highest density treatment, longevity was <3 days; these cohorts may not be, epidemiologically, important in disease transmission, as filarial parasites spend about 10 days within the mosquito to reach infective stage.2,3,69,70 The reverse can be said for cohorts raised at lower density regimen, especially at 1 larva/10 mL. Further studies are advocated to verify the role of density regimens on vector–parasite interaction.
Effects of rearing density on teneral reserve accumulation and distribution among life stages of C quinquefasciatus
In mosquito ecology, overcrowding acting alone or coupled with limited food resources in C quinquefasciatus leads to either or both of exploitative (scramble) or interference competition.52 This competition usually modifies the foraging behaviour, a situation which leads to variations in teneral reserve accumulation, especially during the phagoperiods.61 These reserves (ie, lipid, glucose, glycogen, and protein) are chief determinants of quality of insect adult population and community dynamics.51,59,60
In this study, mosquitoes reared at very high density had significantly low teneral components. These low teneral values could be a direct effect of inefficient teneral mobilisation, which could have been elicited by altered food consumption rate and crowding-related stress conditions. Farrar et al71 opined that food consumption rate in insects is a behavioural trait, which encompasses various physiological performances. Similar tendencies (ie, reduced food consumption due to crowding) have been reported in C quinquefasciatus,50 C sitiens,61 and lepidopterans.72,73 In other insect species and orders, indifference in feeding rhythms74 and increased food consumption75,76 have been reported.
Effects of rearing density on utilisation of metabolic reserve for pupation and eclosion of C quinquefasciatus mosquitoes
Modified foraging behaviour and altered consumption rate can affect the total amount of energy intake and, hence, metabolic reserves.77,78 These also affect the quantity of energy required and available for the metamorphic processes of pupation and eclosion. Pupation and eclosion, themselves, are energy consuming processes, which determines the energy available at adulthood and, hence, adult-life quality.
In this study, C quinquefasciatus mosquito utilised more teneral reserves for pupation than for eclosion. This was expected, as the process of pupation involves tissue re-organisation – a high-energy demanding process – that prepares the insect for life outside the aquatic environment.79 This study also revealed disparity in the total amount of teneral reserve components available for pupation and eclosion across different regimens of mosquito densities. The mosquito cohorts reared at the lowest density regimen (1 larva/10 mL) required the least energy for pupation and eclosion, while those at the highest (1 larva/1.25 mL) required the highest.
The results from the study suggest that when subjected to different density regimen, C quinquefasciatus mosquitoes require greater amount of energy for pupation, than for eclosion. More so, as density regimen increased, the total amount of reserves and individual teneral component required for pupation greatly increased. Likewise, total amount of metabolic reserves and individual teneral component, available for eclosion (though lower than that required for pupation), was also density-dependent.
The above implies that C quinquefasciatus mosquito cohorts reared at higher density regimen may have depleted energy reserves for survival post-emergence. This condition may be responsible for the ephemeral post-emergence longevity observed in this study. More so, greater energy demand during metamorphosis by mosquitoes reared at higher density may signal impaired structural and developmental processes, resulting in greater demand of energy for repairs.
Conclusions
The results from this study are suggestive of reduction in biological fitness of C quinquefasciatus in overcrowded habitat conditions. Growth in the mosquito species from overcrowded treatment was impaired and manifested as delayed developmental times, reduced immature survivorship, reduced adult emergence success, daily survivorship, and short-lived. More so, these mosquitoes expended greater teneral reserves for metamophosis. Further studies are recommended to determine what (1) common levels of overcrowding are in the field, (2) whether overcrowding has comparable effects with those mentioned in this study, and (3) whether energy consumption for pupation and eclosion are comparable with field studies.
Acknowledgments
Our deepest appreciation goes to the Management and Staff members of the Department of Animal Biology, Federal University of Technology, especially, the Head of Department and the Technologists, for providing a conducive environment for the study.
Footnotes
Funding:The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship and/or publication of this article: This study was funded by a sub-award of a grant from the United State Agency for International Development (USAID), USA, Higher Education Partnership/University of Mississippi (UM) (UM SUB-AWARD NO. 15-12-024).
Declaration of conflicting interests:The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Author Contributions: ACU, IKO, and FOA conceived and designed the experiments. ACU, CCO, and CCU performed the experiments. ACU, IKO, FOA, and CCO analysed the data. UAC and CCU wrote the first draft of the manuscript. IKO and FOA corrected the draft copy. All authors agreed to the final state of the manuscript.
ORCID iD: Azubuike Christian Ukubuiwe 
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7409-7568
References
- 1. Katabarwam M, Habomugisha P, Eyamba A, Agunyo S, Mentou C. Monitoring ivermectin distributors involved in integrated health care services through community-directed interventions – a comparison of Cameroon and Uganda experiences over a period of three years (2004-2006). J Trop Med Intern Health. 2008;15:216–223. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Addiss DG, Brady MA. Morbidity management in the global programme to eliminate lymphatic filariasis: a review of scientific literature. Filaria J. 2007;6:9–31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. World Health Organization. WHO fact sheet on lymphatic filariasis. www.who.int/News/factsheet. Up-dated 2018. Accessed June 6, 2018.
- 4. Livdhal TP, Edgerly JS. Egg hatching inhibition: field evidence for population regulation in a treehole mosquito. Ecol Entomo. 1987;12:395–399. [Google Scholar]
- 5. Braks MAH, Honório NA, Lounibos LP, Lourenço-de-Oliveira R, Juliano SA. Interspecific competition between two invasive species of container mosquitoes, Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae), in Brazil. Ann Entom Soc Amer. 2004;97:130–139. [Google Scholar]
- 6. Agnew P, Haussy C, Michalakis Y. Effects of density and larval competition on selected life history traits of Culex pipiens quinquefasciatus (Diptera: Culicidae). J Med Entomol. 2000;37:732–735. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Reisen WK, Emory RW. Intraspecificcompetition in Anopheles stephensi (Diptera Culicidae) II. The effects of more crowded densities and the addition of antibiotics. Can Entom. 1977;109:1475–1480. [Google Scholar]
- 8. Lance DR, Elkinton JS, Schwalbe CP. Components of density-related stress as potential determinants of population quality in the gypsy moth (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae). Envir Entom. 1986; a15:914–918. [Google Scholar]
- 9. Briegel H. Metabolic relationship between female body size, reserves, and fecundity of Aedes aegypti. J Insect Physiol. 1990;36:165–172. [Google Scholar]
- 10. Timmermann SE, Briegel H. Water depth and larval density affect development and accumulation of reserves in laboratory populations of mosquitoes. Bull Soc Vect Ecol. 1993;18:174–187. [Google Scholar]
- 11. Nasci RS, Mitchell CJ. Larval diet, adult size, and susceptibility of Aedes aegypti (Diptera, Culicidae) to infection with Ross River virus. J Med Entomol. 1994;31:123–126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Ameneshewa B, Service MW. The relationship between female body size and survival rate of the malaria vector Anopheles arabiensis in Ethiopia. Med Vet Entomol. 1996;10:170–172. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Takken W, Klowden MJ, Chambers GM. Effect of body size on host seeking and blood meal utilization in Anopheles gambiae sensu stricto (Diptera: Culicidae): the disadvantage of being small. J Med Entomol. 1998;35:639–645. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Schneider P, Takken W, McCall PJ. Interspecific competition between sibling species larvae of Anopheles arabiensis and An. gambiae. Med Vet Entomol. 2000;14:165–170. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Gimnig JE, Ombok M, Otieno S, Kaufman MG, Vulule JM, Walker ED. Density-dependent development of Anopheles gambiae (Diptera: Culicidae) larvae in artificial habitats. J Med Entomol. 2002;39:162–172. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Hooper HL, Sibly RM, Hutchinson TH, Maud SJ. The influence of larval density, food availability and habitat longevity on the life history and population growth rate of the midge Chironomus riparius. Oikos. 2003;102:515–524. [Google Scholar]
- 17. Ye-Ebiyo Y, Pollack RJ, Kiszewski A, Spielman A. Enhancement of development of larval Anopheles arabiensis by proximity to flowering maize (Zea mays) in turbid water and when crowded. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2003;68:748–752. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Tseng M. Sex-specific response of a mosquito to parasites and crowding. Proc Biol Sci. 2004;271:S186–S188. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Tsurim I, Silberbush A, Ovadia O, Blaustein L, Margalith Y. Inter- and intra-specific density-dependent effects on life history and development strategies of larval mosquitoes. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e57875. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Briegel H. Physiological bases of mosquito ecology. J Vector Ecol. 2003;28:1–11. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Klowden MJ. Making generalisations about vectors: is there a physiology of ‘the mosquito’? Entom Res. 2007;37:1–13. [Google Scholar]
- 22. Olayemi IK, Ukubuiwe AC, Oyibo-Usman KA. Mosquito species occurrence and diversity in conventional larval breeding sites in Minna metropolis, Nigeria. Inter J Innov Sci Res. 2014;9:86–93. [Google Scholar]
- 23. Braks M, Leal W, Cardé R. Oviposition responses of gravid female Culex quinquefasciatus to egg rafts and low doses of oviposition pheromone under semi-field conditions. J Chem Ecol. 2007;33:567–578. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Kiflawi M, Blaustein L, Mangel M. Oviposition habitat selection by the mosquito Culiseta longiareolata in response to risk of predation and conspecific larval density. Ecol Entom. 2003;28:168–173. [Google Scholar]
- 25. Mboera LEG, Takken W, Midra KY, Pickett JA. Sampling gravid Culex quinquefasciatus (Diptera: Culicidae) using traps baited with synthetic oviposition pheromone and grass infusions in Tanzania. J Med Entom. 2000;33:172–176. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Olagbemiro TO, Birkett MA, Mordue Luntz AJ, Pickett JA. Laboratory and field responses of the mosquito, Culex quinquefasciatus, to plant derived Culex spp. J Chem Ecol. 2004;30:965–976. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Chaves LF, Keogh CL, Vazquez-Prokopec GM, Kitron UD. Combined sewage overflow enhances oviposition of Culex quinquefasciatus (Diptera: Culicidae) in urban areas. J Med Entomol. 2009;46:220–226. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Eitam A, Blaustein L. Oviposition habitat selection by mosquitoes in response to predator (Notonecta maculata) density. Physiol Entom. 2004;29:188–191. [Google Scholar]
- 29. Olayemi IK, Olupinla T, Ukubuiwe AC, Odeyemi MO, Salihu IM. Distribution and oviposition dynamics of mosquito (Diptera: Culicidae) in response to ovitrap substratal material in Minna, Nigeria. Malaya J Biosci. 2014; b1:117–125. [Google Scholar]
- 30. Lothrop BB, Mulla MS. Diel patterns of oviposition and influence of agitated water surface in Chironomus anonymus (Diptera: Chironomidae). J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 1996;12:215–219. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Reiskind MH, Wilson ML. Culex restuans (Diptera: Culicidae) oviposition behaviour determined by larval habitat quality and quantity in south-eastern Michigan. J Med Entom. 2004;41:179–186. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Chadee DD, Haeger JS. A description of the egg of Culex (Culex) nigripalpus Theobald from Florida, with notes on five egg rafts (Diptera: Culicidae). Mosq Systematics. 1986;18:288–292. [Google Scholar]
- 33. Ukubuiwe AC, Olayemi IK, Jibrin AI. Genetic variations in bionomics of Culex quinquefasciatus (Diptera: Culicidae) mosquito population in Minna, North Central Nigeria. Int J Insect Sci. 2016;8:9–15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Spencer M, Blaustein L, Cohen JE. Oviposition habitat selection by mosquitoes (Culiseta longiareolata) and consequences for population size. Ecology. 2002;83:669–679. [Google Scholar]
- 35. Mwangangi JM, Mbogo CM, Muturi EJ, Nzovu JG, Githure J, Beier JC. Spatial distribution and habitat characterisation of Anopheles Larvae along the Kenya coast. J. Vector Borne Dis. 2007;44:44–51. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Muturi EJ, Mwangangi J, Shililu J, et al. Environmental factors associated with the distribution of Anopheles arabiensis and Culex quinquefasciatus in a rice agro-ecosystem in Mwea, Kenya. J Vector Ecol. 2008;33:56–63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Mgbemena IC, Ebe T. Distribution and occurrence of mosquito species in the municipal areas of Imo State, Nigeria. Analele Univ Oradea – Fascic Biol. 2012;19:93–100. [Google Scholar]
- 38. Alto BW, Kesavaraju B, Juliano SA, Lounibos LP. Stage-dependent predation on competitors: consequences for the outcome of a mosquito invasion. J Anim Ecol. 2009;78:928–936. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Edgerly JS, Livdahl TP. Density-dependent interactions within a complex life cycle: the roles of cohort structure and mode of recruitment. J Animal Ecol. 1992;61:139–150. [Google Scholar]
- 40. Legros M, Lloyd AL, Huang YX, Gould F. Density-dependent intraspecific competition in the larval stage of Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae): revisiting the current paradigm. J Med Entom. 2009;46:409–419. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Ukubuiwe AC, Olayemi IK, Omalu ICJ, Odeyemi MO, Jibrin AI, Oyibo-Usman KA. Comparative assessment of immature survivorship and developmental duration of Culex pipiens pipiens (Diptera: Culicidae) populations in north central Nigeria. Biomed Central Epidemiology. 2012;3:WMC003753. [Google Scholar]
- 42. Olayemi IK, Ande AT. Life table analysis of Anopheles gambiae (Diptera: Culicidae) in relation to malaria transmission. J Vector Borne Dis. 2009;46:295–298. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Timmermann SE, Briegel H. Larval growth and biosynthesis of reserves in mosquitoes. J Insect Physiol. 1999;45:461–470. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Van-Handel E. Rapid determination of glycogen and sugar in mosquitoes. J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 1985; a1:299–304. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Van Handel E. Rapid determination of total lipids in mosquitoes. J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 1985;1:302–304. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Van Handel E, Day JF. Assay of lipids, glycogen and sugars in individual mosquitoes: correlations with wing length in field-collected Aedes vexans. J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 1988;4:549–550. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Kaufmann C, Brown MR. Regulation of carbohydrate metabolism and flight performance by a hypertrehalosaemic hormone in the mosquito Anopheles gambiae. J Insect Physiol. 2008;54:367–377. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Ukubuiwe AC, Olayemi IK, Omalu ICJ, Arimoro FO, Baba BM, Ukubuiwe CC. Influence of variable photoperiod on life-stages mobilization of teneral reserves in Culex quinquefasciatus (Diptera: Culicidae): implication for environmental manipulation for vector control. Mol Entom. 2018;9:1–10. doi: 10.5376/me.2018.09.0001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Abubakar NE, Olayemi IK, Ukubuiwe AC. Evaluation of the influence of homogenate filtrates of some larval habitat-inhabiting flora and fauna species on immature development and adult body size of Culex quinquefasciatus Mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae). Mal J Biosci. 2018;5:57–63. [Google Scholar]
- 50. Roberts D, Kokkinn M. Larval crowding effects on the mosquito Culex quinquefasciatus: physical or chemical? Entom. Experim Appl. 2010;135:271–275. [Google Scholar]
- 51. Chambers GM, Klowden MJ. Correlation of nutritional reserves with a critical weight for pupation in larval Aedes aegypti mosquitoes. J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 1990;6:394–399. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Keddy PA. Competition. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic; 2001:552. [Google Scholar]
- 53. Suleman M. The effects of intraspecific competition for food and space on the larval development of Culex quinquefasciatus. Mosq News. 1982;42:347–356. [Google Scholar]
- 54. Reisen WK, Milby MM, Bock ME. The effects of immature stress on selected events in the life history of Culex tarsalis. Mosq News. 1984;44:385–395. [Google Scholar]
- 55. Siddiqui TF, Aslam Y, Reisen WK. The effects of larval density on selected immature and adult attributes in Culex tritaeniorhynchus Giles. Trop Med. 1976;18:195–202. [Google Scholar]
- 56. Couret J, Dotson E, Benedict MQ. Temperature, larval diet, and density effects on development rate and survival of Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae). PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e87468. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0087468. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Connat JL, Delbecque IG, Delachambre J. The onset of metamorphosis in Tenebrio molitor larvae (Insecta, Coleoptera) under grouped, isolated and starved conditions. J Insect Physiol. 1991;37:653–662. [Google Scholar]
- 58. Tuciæ N, Miloševiæ M, Gliksman I, Milanoviæ D, Aleksiæ I. The effects of larval density on genetic variation and covariation among life-history traits in the bean weevil (Acanthoscelides obtectus Say). Functional Ecol. 1991;5:525–534. [Google Scholar]
- 59. Tammaru T, Ruohomki K, Montola M. Crowding-induced plasticity in Epirrita autumnata (Lepidoptera: Geometridae): weak evidence of specific modifications in reaction norms. Oikos. 2000;90:171–181. [Google Scholar]
- 60. Hirschberger P. Larval population density affects female weight and fecundity in the dung beetle Aphodius ater. Ecol Entom. 1999;24:316–322. [Google Scholar]
- 61. Roberts D. Overcrowding of Culex sitiens (Diptera: Culicidae) larvae: population regulation by chemical factors or mechanical interference. J Med Entom. 1998;35:665–669. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62. Costanzo KS, Mormann K, Juliano SA. Asymmetrical competition and patterns of abundance of Aedes albopictus and Culex pipiens (Diptera: Culicidae). J Med Entomol. 2005;42:559–570. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63. Maciá A. Effects of larval crowding on development time, survival and weight at metamorphosis in Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae). Rev Socied Entomol Argentina. 2009;68:107–114. [Google Scholar]
- 64. Bedhomme S, Agnew P, Sidobre C, Michalakis Y. Sex specific reaction norms to intraspecific larval competition in the mosquito Aedes aegypti. J Evol Biol. 2003;16:721–730. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65. Muriu SM, Coulson T, Mbogo CM, Godfray HCJ. Larval density dependence in Anopheles gambiae s.s., the major African vector of malaria. J Anim Ecol. 2013;82:166–174. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66. World Health Organization (WHO). Operational Guide for Assessing the Productivity of Aedes aegypti Breeding Sites. Geneva, Switzerland: Special Programme for Research and Training in Tropical Diseases; (TDR). http://whqlibdoc.who.int/hq/2011/TDR_IDE_DEN_03.1.pdf. accessed September 19, 2011. [Google Scholar]
- 67. Afrane YA, Zhou G, Lawson BW, Githeko AK, Yan G. Effects of microclimatic changes caused by deforestation on the survivorship and reproductive fitness of Anopheles gambiae in western Kenya highlands. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2006;74:772–778. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68. Pelizza SA, Lopez Lastra CC, Becnel JJ, Bisaro V, Garcia JJ. Effects of temperature, pH and salinity on the infection of Leptolegnia chapmanii Seymour (Peronosporomycetes) in mosquito larvae. J Invertebr Pathol. 2007;96:133–137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69. Ridley JW. Parasitology for medical and Clinical Laboratory Professionals. Clifton Park, NY: Cengage Learning; 2012:103–104. [Google Scholar]
- 70. Rajan TV. Textbook of Medical Parasitology. New Delhi, India: BI Publications; 2002:73–77. [Google Scholar]
- 71. Farrar RR, Barbour JD, Kennedy GG. Quantifying food consumption and growth in insects. Annals of Entom Soc Am. 1989;82:593–598. [Google Scholar]
- 72. Kause A, Saloniemi I, Haukioja E, Hanhimaki S. How to become large quickly: quantitative genetics of growth and foraging in a flush feeding lepidopteran larva. J Evol Biol. 1999;12:471–482. [Google Scholar]
- 73. Lazarevic J, Peric-Mataruga V, Vlahovic M, Mrdakovic M, Cvetanovic D. Effects of rearing density on larval growth and activity of digestive enzymes in Lymantria dispar L. Folia Biol (Krakow). 2004;52:105–112. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74. Lance DR, Elkinton JS, Schwalbe CP. Feeding rhythms of gypsy moth larvae: effect of food quality during outbreaks. Ecology. 1986;67:1650–1654. [Google Scholar]
- 75. Simmonds MSJ, Blaney WM. Effects of rearing density on development and feeding behaviour in larvae of Spodoptera exempta. J Insect Physiol. 1986;32:1043–1053. [Google Scholar]
- 76. Weaver DK, McFarlane JE. The effect of larval density on growth and development of Tenebrio molitor. J Insect Physiol. 1990;36:531–536. [Google Scholar]
- 77. Applebaum SW. Biochemistry of digestion. In: Kerkut GA, Gilbert LI, eds. Comprehensive Insect Physiology, Biochemistry, and Pharmacology. Vol. 7 Oxford, UK: Pergamon; 1985:219–311. [Google Scholar]
- 78. Applebaum SW, Heifetz Y. Density-dependent physiological phase in insects. Annu Rev Entomol. 1999;44:317–341. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79. Gillott C. Entomology. 3rd ed. New York, NY: Springer; 2005:500–511. [Google Scholar]