Here, we report the annotated draft genome sequences of three Pseudomonas spp. and two Bacillus spp. that, as consortia, degrade polyethylene terephthalate plastic. Improved microbial degradation of plastic waste could help reduce the billions of metric tons of these materials that currently exist in our environment.
ABSTRACT
Here, we report the annotated draft genome sequences of three Pseudomonas spp. and two Bacillus spp. that, as consortia, degrade polyethylene terephthalate plastic. Improved microbial degradation of plastic waste could help reduce the billions of metric tons of these materials that currently exist in our environment.
ANNOUNCEMENT
Polyethylene terephthalate (PET) makes up a significant percentage of waste that accumulates in landfills and oceans, where it persists for decades or centuries. Seeking a method to aid in the accelerated decomposition of this material, we isolated five organisms that degrade PET. We predicted that bacteria that can degrade petroleum can potentially degrade chemically related plastics; thus, we obtained soil samples from locations polluted with petroleum products adjacent to Superfund sites near Houston, TX. Since lipases are enzymes associated with plastic degradation, we initially screened environmental isolates for lipase activity on rhodamine B agar plates, using olive oil as a source of long-chain fatty acids. Rhodamine B dye binds to free fatty acids (cleaved by a lipase) and glows when exposed to UV light at 365 nm. Thus, the presence of glowing halos around the colonies indicated lipase activity. Gram staining was used to monitor the purity of the cultures. In total, 192 colonies were screened after appearing to be lipase positive. One colony, named consortium 9, contained two strains, 9.1 and 9.2, while another colony, named consortium 13, contained two strains, 13.1 and 13.2. A single strain, 10, was also putatively positive for lipase activity. Description of the isolation of the strains can be found at https://www.ted.com/talks/morgan_vague_this_bacteria_eats_plastic. The consortia and the axenic strains were grown in liquid carbon-free basal medium (LCFBM) prepared with deionized water containing (per liter) 0.7 g of KH2PO4, 0.7 g of K2HPO4, 0.7 g of MgSO4·7H2O, 1.0 g of NH4NO3, 0.005 g of NaCl, 0.002 g of FeSO4·7H2O, 0.002 g of ZnSO4·7H2O, and 0.001 g of MnSO4·H2O (1). PET was introduced to LCFBM as a sole carbon source, and incubation with bacteria occurred at 30°C with shaking for 6 weeks. With UV pretreatment, all strains and consortia reduced the weight of the granular PET, except strain 9.1, which was unable to grow on the plastic as a sole carbon source (Fig. 1). However, consortium 9, containing strains 9.1 and 9.2, reduced the weight of the PET to a greater extent than did strain 9.2 alone (P = 0.0002). Interestingly, the full consortium (FC) containing all five strains reduced the weight of the granular PET more over the 6-week period than did any of the other individual strains or consortia (P < 0.0001). The 100-mg PET granule weighed 3.15 mg less after incubation with the full consortium, at an ∼3% reduction rate, and these results suggest that the strains can act synergistically to degrade PET plastic.
To identify the metabolic pathways and genes associated with PET degradation, we obtained genome sequences of the five strains. Briefly, bacteria were grown in lysogeny broth at 26°C overnight. DNA was extracted using the GenElute bacterial genomic DNA kit (MilliporeSigma, St. Louis, MO). For library preparation, performed at the Oregon State University (OSU) Center for Genome Research and Biocomputing, Illumina’s Nextera XT DNA sample prep kit (San Diego, CA) was used, following the manufacturer’s instructions. Sequencing was done on an Illumina MiSeq instrument with a run type of 150-bp paired-end fragments on a micro flow cell. The quality of the sequence fragments was assessed using FastQC (v0.11.5 [2]) and Trimmomatic (v0.36 [3]) for a quality standard of Q30 (LEADING:3 TRAILING:3 HEADCROP:10 SLIDINGWINDOW:4:30 MINLEN:36). High-quality sequence fragments (1,652,364 read average per sample) were then assembled using SPAdes (v3.13.0 [4]) with paired-end reads and high-quality singletons. The quality and genome metrics were analyzed using QUAST (v5) and are presented in Table 1 (5). The draft genome sizes range from 5,261,475 to 6,456,746 bp, and the GC content is 34.9% for the Bacillus draft genomes and 61.5% for the Pseudomonas draft genomes. Assemblies were annotated using Prokka (v1.13.3 [6]). An average of 5,557 protein-coding sequences were predicted for the draft genomes of our strains. Close relatives of 16S rRNA genes were as follows: for 9.1, Bacillus thuringiensis strain C15 (100% coverage/100% identity); for 9.2, Pseudomonas sp. B10 (100% coverage/99% identity); for 10, Pseudomonas sp. SWI36 (100% coverage/100% identity); for 13.1, Bacillus albus strain PFYN01 (100% coverage/100% identity); and for 13.2, Pseudomonas sp. SWI36 (100% coverage/100% identity). Preliminary metabolic comparisons using the KEGG database via BlastKOALA (7) have shown that the genomes share central carbohydrate metabolism and biosynthetic capabilities, such as synthesis of nucleotides and amino acids. The genomes also share genes associated with transport systems for simple and complex biomolecules. Each genome has numerous genes predicted to encode lipase-like enzymes. Interesting differences observed from these analyses include the potential for assimilatory sulfate reduction in three out of the five genomes (9.2, 10, and 13.2). Two other genomes possess complete pathways for dissimilatory nitrate reduction (9.1 and 13.1).
TABLE 1.
Strain | No. of high-quality reads | Genome size (bp) | No. of contigs >1 kb | GC content (%) | N50 value (bp) | Largest contig (bp) | Top BlastN 16S rRNA hit | No. of predicted proteins (Prokka) | BioSample accession no. |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
9.1 | 1,948,613 | 5,261,475 | 139 | 35.0 | 103,322 | 252,489 | Bacillus thuringiensis strain C15 | 5,275 | SAMN10824115 |
9.2 | 1,258,720 | 6,215,199 | 118 | 60.7 | 105,169 | 354,110 | Pseudomonas sp. B10 | 5,565 | SAMN10824116 |
10 | 1,582,339 | 5,786,271 | 214 | 61.9 | 50,964 | 247,856 | Pseudomonas sp. SWI36 | 5,186 | SAMN10824117 |
13.1 | 1,657,136 | 6,456,746 | 477 | 34.9 | 31,034 | 166,467 | Bacillus albus strain PFYN01 | 6,566 | SAMN10824118 |
13.2 | 1,815,014 | 5,790,691 | 208 | 61.9 | 50,542 | 258,222 | Pseudomonas sp. SWI36 | 5,193 | SAMN10824119 |
Data availability.
The DNA sequences and genome assemblies have been deposited in GenBank under BioProject number PRJNA517285 and the following SRA and BioSample accession numbers, respectively: SRX5623359 and SAMN10824115 for strain 9.1, SRX5623360 and SAMN10824116 for strain 9.2, SRX5623357 and SAMN10824117 for strain 10, SRX5623358 and SAMN10824118 for strain 13.1, and SRX5623356 and SAMN10824119 for strain 13.2.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This work was supported in part by a Reed Biology Undergraduate Research Project grant awarded to Cameron Roberts. Rosa León-Zayas is funded in part through a startup grant from the M. J. Murdock Charitable Trust.
The five bacterial strains were initially isolated by Morgan Vague (Reed College, 2017) for her senior thesis research.
We are grateful to Mark Dasenko from the Oregon State University Center for Genome Research and Biocomputing for insights related to sequencing efforts.
REFERENCES
- 1.Yang J, Yang Y, Wu WM, Zhao J, Jiang L. 2014. Evidence of polyethylene biodegradation by bacterial strains from the guts of plastic-eating waxworms. Environ Sci Technol 48:13776–13786. doi: 10.1021/es504038a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Brown J, Pirrung M, McCue LA. 2017. FQC Dashboard: integrates FastQC results into a Web-based, interactive, and extensible FASTQ quality control tool. Bioinformatics 33:3137–3139. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx373. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B. 2014. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 30:2114–2120. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Bankevich A, Nurk S, Antipov D, Gurevich A, Dvorkin M, Kulikov A, Lesin VM, Nikolenko SI, Pham S, Prjibelski AD, Pyshkin AV, Sirotkin AV, Vyahhi N, Tesler G, Alekseyev MA, Pevzner PA. 2012. SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J Comput Biol 19:455–477. doi: 10.1089/cmb.2012.0021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Gurevich A, Saveliev V, Vyahhi N, Tesler G. 2013. QUAST: quality assessment tool for genome assemblies. Bioinformatics 29:1072–1075. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt086. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Seemann T. 2014. Prokka: rapid prokaryotic genome annotation. Bioinformatics 30:2068–2069. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Kanehisa M, Sato Y, Morishima K. 2016. BlastKOALA and GhostKOALA: KEGG tools for functional characterization of genome and metagenome sequences. J Mol Biol 428:726–731. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2015.11.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
The DNA sequences and genome assemblies have been deposited in GenBank under BioProject number PRJNA517285 and the following SRA and BioSample accession numbers, respectively: SRX5623359 and SAMN10824115 for strain 9.1, SRX5623360 and SAMN10824116 for strain 9.2, SRX5623357 and SAMN10824117 for strain 10, SRX5623358 and SAMN10824118 for strain 13.1, and SRX5623356 and SAMN10824119 for strain 13.2.