Skip to main content
BMJ Open logoLink to BMJ Open
. 2019 Jun 19;9(6):e026324. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026324

The impact of maternal health care utilisation on routine immunisation coverage of children in Nigeria: a cross-sectional study

Onyekachi Ibenelo Anichukwu 1, Benedict Oppong Asamoah 2
PMCID: PMC6588997  PMID: 31221876

Abstract

Objective

To examine the impact of maternal healthcare (MHC) utilisation on routine immunisation coverage of children in Nigeria.

Design

Individual level cross-sectional study using bivariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses to examine the association between MHC utilisation and routine immunisation coverage of children.

Setting

Nigeria Demographic and Health Survey 2013.

Participants

5506 women aged 15–49 years with children aged 12–23 months born in the 5 years preceding the survey.

Primary outcome measures

Fully immunised children and not fully immunised children.

Results

The percentage of children fully immunised with basic routine childhood vaccines by the age of 12 months was 25.8%. Antenatal care (ANC) attendance irrespective of the number of visits (adjusted OR (AOR)1–3 visits 2.4, 95% CI 1.79 to 3.27; AOR4–7 visits 3.2, 95% CI 2.52 to 4.13; AOR≥ 8 visits 3.5, 95% CI 2.64 to 4.50), skilled birth attendance (SBA) (AOR 1.9, 95% CI 1.65 to 2.35); and maternal postnatal care (PNC) (AOR 1.7, 95% CI 1.46 to 2.06) had positive effects on the child being fully immunised after adjusting for covariates (except for each other, ie, ANC, SBA and PNC). Further analyses (adjusting stepwise for each MHC service) showed a mediation effect that led to the effect of PNC not being significant.

Conclusions

The percentage of fully immunised children in Nigeria was very low. ANC attendance, SBA and maternal PNC attendance had positive impact on the child being fully immunised. The findings suggest that strategies aimed at maximising MHC utilisation in Nigeria could be effective in achieving the national coverage target of at least 80% for routine immunisation of children.

Keywords: antenatal, maternal health care utilisation, routine immunisation coverage, skilled birth attendance, postnatal care


Strengths and limitations of this study.

  • The reliability of this study is increased by the suitability of the research questions and detailed description of the dependent variable, predictor variables and other covariates, the quality of the Nigeria Demographic and Health Survey (NDHS) women’s questionnaire, which is a carefully developed standard model questionnaire and by having a well categorised dependent variable. The NDHS provided a large sample size and high-quality data which reduced the risk of sampling bias and measurement bias in this study.

  • Confounding was controlled for through the proper formation of subcategories of the predictor variables and other covariates; and the consideration of a wide range of covariates in the multivariable logistic regression analysis which reduced the risk of confounding, increasing the internal validity of this study.

  • The NDHS questionnaires are not self-administered, which makes the data prone to interviewer bias. This could reduce the internal validity of this study. Also, the inclusion of immunisation status of the children from verbal reports of the mother might have introduced recall bias into this study because mothers who used maternal healthcare (MHC) may have better recall than mothers who used no MHC.

  • There is still risk for residual confounding even after controlling for confounding in this study and the non-exploration of partially immunised children might have led to loss of information regarding routine immunisation coverage in Nigeria.

  • Vaccine stockouts, poor cold chain systems and non-readiness of healthcare providers to administer the vaccines during mothers’ use of maternal health services in Nigeria are provider side barriers to the child being fully immunised, which could have led to an underestimation of the impact of MHC utilisation on routine immunisation coverage found in this study.

Introduction

Developing countries, especially sub-Saharan African countries, where the rate of neonatal and under-five mortality is disproportionately high have been urged by the United Nations to put in place measures that will reduce neonatal mortality rate to about 12/1000 live births and under-five mortality to about 25/1000 live births by 2030.1–3 Much of neonatal and under-five mortality in sub-Saharan African countries is attributable to childhood diseases which can be prevented by immunisation.2 Immunisation is a very efficient and cost-effective public health intervention which prevents about 2.5 million childhood mortality per year and it is considered one of the main cost-effective interventions that can be used to achieve the Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 3.2—to end preventable deaths of newborns and children under-five by 2030.1 4–7

In an effort to combat vaccine-preventable diseases and to reduce neonatal and under-five mortality and morbidity globally, the WHO initiated the Expanded Programme on Immunisation (EPI) in 1974 with a goal to immunise every child in the world by the year 1990.8–10 The EPI targets children under 12 months of age with a dose of BCG vaccine, three doses of Poliomyelitis vaccine (OPV), three doses of Diphtheria-Tetanus-Pertussis (DTP) vaccine and a dose of Measles vaccine. The programme was introduced into Nigeria by the Federal Ministry of Health in collaboration with WHO and UNICEF in 1976 as a pilot programme, while the national implementation commenced in 1979.10–13 The goal of the programme in Nigeria was to reach immunisation coverage rate of 80% by 1990 in order to reduce to 50% the mortality and morbidity rate resulting from the EPI targeted diseases.10 Only 20.4% reduction in neonatal mortality rate was achieved by 1990 and the actual neonatal mortality rate was 49/1000 live births in the same year.14 15 However, there was not much reduction in neonatal mortality from 1990 to 2013, the neonatal mortality rate was 37/1000 live births by 2012.14 15

In Nigeria, routine immunisation is integrated into the maternal healthcare (MHC) both in the public and private health sectors in all the 36 states and the Federal Capital Territory.16 The MHC continuum consists of antenatal care (ANC), skilled birth attendance (SBA) and postnatal care (PNC).17 18 The progress in the proportion of fully immunised children (ie, children who received all six recommended vaccines) from 1990 to 2013 was very little.19 20 The Nigeria Demographic and Health Survey (NDHS) 2013 report showed that the trends in full immunisation coverage of children aged 12–23 months increased from 13% in 2003 to 25% in 2013.21 The progress in the proportion of fully immunised children from 2003 to 2013 corresponded to the increase in ANC utilisation (from 58% in 2003 to 61% in 2013) and SBA (from 35% in 2003 to 38% in 2013).22 From 2008–2013, there was no significant improvement in the proportion of women who received PNC; 58% of women received no PNC within 41 days after delivery in 2013.22

MHC and routine immunisation have been identified as important public health tools in achieving the SDG 3, ‘ensuring healthy lives and promoting well-being for all at all ages’.23 Studies have shown that children are more likely to be fully immunised in Ghana, the Gambia, Burkina Faso and the Republic of Benin than in Nigeria.24–26 Living in the Northern region of Nigeria has been found to be associated with lower likelihood of children to be fully immunised compared with other regions of the country.24 27 In addition, children in the urban areas are more likely to be fully immunised than children in the rural areas.24 25 27 Furthermore, the richest quintile in the household socio-economic class, maternal age of 34 years and older, being a first-born child and ownership of vaccine card are positively associated with fully immunised children in Nigeria.24 25 27 These studies examined different socio-demographic factors that are associated with immunisation coverage in Nigeria. However, to the best of our knowledge, no study has examined the impact of MHC utilisation holistically on routine immunisation coverage of children in Nigeria. Therefore, the main aim of this study was to examine the impact of MHC utilisation on routine immunisation coverage of children in Nigeria.

Methods

Study setting and study population

Nigeria is a sub-Saharan African country with a population of about 180 million and a birth cohort of 7.3 million.28 Nigeria is made up of 36 states and a Federal Capital Territory which altogether are grouped into six geopolitical zones (North Central, North East, North West, South East, South South and South West) with 774 local government areas.28

To examine the impact of MHC utilisation on routine immunisation coverage of children in Nigeria, a population of mothers aged 15–49 years from the six geopolitical zones of Nigeria, with their children between the age of 12–23 months were selected from the women’s data of the NDHS 2013. The last birth experience of the mothers in the 5 years preceding the survey were used in this study. Each of the mothers contributed one child only and a total of 5506 mothers with their children (2638 girls, 2868 boys) were included in this study.

Study design and data collection

This study was an individual level cross-sectional study, which used the individual women’s data of the NDHS 2013; the most recent data available at the time this study was carried out. One of the main goals of the NDHS 2013 was to provide information about maternal and child health, as well as immunisation coverage. The women’s data contained all births in the 5 years preceding the NDHS 2013 and it also contained information about all women from 15 to 49 years of age from a sample of 40 680 households with 904 clusters (primary sampling units) of which 372 and 532 clusters were in the urban and rural areas respectively.21 A fixed sample unit of 45 households were selected from each enumeration area.

The women interviewed were permanent residents of the households in the survey sample or a visitor to the households on the night before the survey. Information on vaccination coverage for children were collected from children’s vaccination cards and/or from verbal reports from the mothers. The NDHS 2013 data were collected from all the six geopolitical zones in Nigeria; hence, it is a nationally representative data.21

Dependent variables

The outcome variable is routine immunisation coverage which was dichotomised as ‘not fully immunised’ and ‘fully immunised’. The WHO recommends that a child should have received all the basic routine vaccines by the time the child is 12 months old.21 Therefore, for this study, a child is said to be fully immunised if the child had received all the six vaccines, namely a dose of BCG, three doses of OPV, three doses of DTP and a dose of Measles by age of 12 months. A child is said to not to be fully immunised if the child was partially vaccinated or not vaccinated at all by age of 12 months.

Predictor variables

The predictor variables include ANC attendance, SBA and maternal PNC.

ANC attendance

In the NDHS 2013 women’s questionnaire, a woman is said to have received ANC from skilled health providers if she has seen a skilled health provider for ANC during pregnancy for the most recent birth in the 5 years preceding the survey.21 For this study, skilled health providers trained in ANC included a doctor, nurse, midwife and auxiliary midwife. In the WHO’s new ANC model, the minimum recommended number of ANC visits has increased from four to eight visits.29 30 Hence, the number of ANC visits was grouped as follows: None, one to three times, four to seven times and ≥eight times.

Skilled birth attendance

According to the WHO, a woman is said to have used skilled birth attendance (SBA) if the woman’s delivery leading to a live birth was attended by a skilled health provider such as doctor, nurse and midwife trained in child delivery.21 For this study, a SBA included a doctor, nurse and midwife trained in child delivery. Hence, a woman whose most recent child was delivered by a SBA in the 5 years preceding the survey was considered as ‘Yes, to SBA’. Other forms of birth attendance were deemed unskilled birth attendance and were considered as ‘No, to SBA’.

Maternal PNC

The WHO recommendation on PNC stresses that mothers and newborns should receive PNC from a skilled health provider in the facility within 24 hours after delivery or at home as early as possible within 24 hours of delivery and at least three additional postnatal contacts for mothers and newborns on day 3, and between 1 and 2 weeks after delivery and 6 weeks after delivery.31 In this study, skilled health providers trained in maternal PNC included a doctor, nurse, midwife and auxiliary midwife. For this study, a mother who received postnatal check-up within 41 days after delivery from a skilled health provider trained in maternal PNC for the mother’s last birth experience in the 5 years preceding the survey was considered as ‘Yes, to maternal PNC’, while other forms of maternal PNC were considered as ‘No, to maternal PNC’.

Control variables

After a thorough literature review about potential confounders in this area of study, a list of covariates associated with the utilisation of MHC and which are also associated with routine immunisation coverage were considered. The covariates considered include highest educational level, wealth index, geopolitical zone, place of residence, person who decides on mother’s healthcare, parity, mother’s age and mother’s occupation. The categorisation of the control variables is presented below.

Highest educational level was categorised into four groups, namely; (1) no education (reference group), (2) primary education (completed 6 years of formal education), (3) secondary education (completed 12 years of formal education) and (4) higher education (completed 16 years of formal education).

Wealth index was measured based on ownership of household assets (bicycles and televisions), access to different types of water, the use of different types of sanitation facilities and the type of material used in housing construction. Wealth index was first categorised into five quintiles and recategorised into three groups in this study as (1) poor, which comprised of respondents in the poorer and poorest classes (reference group), (2) middle class and (3) rich, which comprised of respondents in the richer and richest classes.

Geopolitical zone was categorised into the six geopolitical zones in Nigeria, namely: North Central (reference group), North East, North West, South East, South South and South West.

Place of residence was categorised into Urban residence and Rural residence (reference group).

Person who decides on mother’s healthcare was categorised into three groups as (1) mother alone, (2) mother and husband/partner/other person and (3) husband/partner/other person (reference group).

Parity is the total number of births with a gestational period of at least 24 weeks by the respondents irrespective of outcome. Parity (total number of children ever born) was categorised as follows: one (reference group), two to five and ≥six.

Mother’s age (in years) was categorised into three groups as follows: 15–24 years (reference group), 25–34 years and 35–49 years.

Mother’s occupation was categorised into three groups as (1) not working (reference group), (2) unskilled–Low skilled, which comprised of unskilled manual job, household/domestic job, sales job and services and (3) middle–High skilled, which comprised of professional/technical/managerial job, clerical job, skilled manual job and agricultural—employed/self-employed.

Statistical analysis

Preliminary data analysis

The analysis was performed using the statistical software SPSS V.25. Prior to the analysis, the data were screened and cleaned using exploratory data analysis.32 33 Recoding of some selected variables into categorical variables and the creation of new variables from the existing variables were performed where it deemed necessary. Weight variable was created using the women’s weight, i.e. v005 variable (v005/1 000 000).34 The weight was applied in all analyses involving significance testing or CIs in order to restore the representativeness of the sample.34 Additionally, the complex survey design in the NDHS 2013 dataset was adjusted for in the analysis to prevent underestimation of the standard errors.21 This was done in this study by specifying the sample design in the analytical software (SPSS) during all analyses involving confidence intervals, standard errors and significant testing. Multicollinearity diagnostic was used to examine the predictor variables for the presence of multicollinearity and to remove variables with variance inflation factor value of greater than 10 (>10) from the analysis.32 33 Correlation analysis was used to ensure that the correlation between the predictor variables were less than equal to 0.8 (≤0.8).32 Casewise diagnostic was used to make sure that there were no potential outliers that could alter the results of the analyses.32

Descriptive statistics

Descriptive statistics was used to examine the sex of children and the socio-demographic characteristics of their mothers.32 33 Cross-tabulation was performed to show the immunisation status of children according to the sex of children and socio-demographic characteristics of their mothers.

Bivariate analysis

Bivariate logistic regression analysis was used to examine the impact of the predictor variables (ANC attendance, SBA and maternal PNC) on immunisation coverage of children aged 12–23 months.32 33 The statistical significance level (p value) was set at <0.05.32 33 Crude ORs with 95% confidence interval (95% CI) were generated for the association between routine immunisation coverage and ANC attendance, SBA and maternal PNC in the bivariate logistic regression analysis.

χ2 test for independence was used to examine the association between routine immunisation coverage and the covariates.32 33 In order to prevent the removal of covariates that could potentially affect the results of the multivariable logistic regression analysis, the χ2 test was used to identify and select covariates with p values ≤0.25 for further analysis in the logistic regression models.32

Multivariable logistic regression analysis

Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to develop different models for the relationship between routine immunisation coverage, predictor variables and covariates, and to control for confounding effects using the manual forward elimination approach, that is, forward selection method. For each multivariable logistic regression analysis, the main predictor variable was added first in the equation followed by other variables in an increasing order of the p values of the variables from the χ2 test for independence.32 The statistical significant level (p value) in the multivariable logistic regression analysis was set at <0.05.32 33 A covariate that is non-significant but caused ≥10% change in the OR of any variable in the equation was retained as a potential confounder.32 Several multivariable logistic regression analyses (using one predictor variable, ie ANC, SBA or PNC at a time) were performed to generate the adjusted ORs (AORs) with 95% CI in different models. To examine the direct impact of each predictor variable individually on immunisation coverage of children independent of the covariates, a multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to generate three different models. To examine the changes in the impact of the predictor variables on routine immunisation coverage independent of the covariates along the MHC continuum, a stepwise multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to generate three different models.

Patient involvement

No patients were involved in developing the research question and study design or in the implementation of the study design, the interpretation of the results and writing of the manuscript. There are no plans to share the study with patients.

Results

Descriptive analysis results

The weighted immunisation status of children according to the sex of the children and socio-demographic characteristics of their mothers are shown in table 1. The percentages of male and female children aged 12–23 months in the study were 52.1% (2868) and 47.9% (2638), respectively. The percentage of children who were fully immunised was only 25.8% (1419). About 74% (74.4%, 1973) of female children were not fully immunised whereas only 25.6% (678) of female children were fully immunised. About 74% (73.9%, 2102) of male children were not fully immunised whereas only 26.1% (741) of male children were fully immunised.

Table 1.

Socio-demographic characteristics of mothers (aged 15–49 years) by immunisation status of their children aged 12–23 months in Nigeria. Total (n)=5506. (Nigeria Demographic and Health Survey 2013)

Characteristics (Unweighted) (Weighted)
Total population Not fully immunised Fully immunised
n (%) n (%) n (%)
Mother’s age (in years)
 15–24 1543 28.0 1277 80.9 301 19.1
 25–34 2697 49.0 1877 70.2 797 29.8
 35–49 1266 23.0 922 74.2 321 25.8
(Total missing) (0)
(Total included in the analysis) (5506)
Sex of child
 Male 2868 52.1 2102 73.9 741 26.1
 Female 2638 47.9 1973 74.4 678 25.6
(Total missing) (0)
(Total included in the analysis) (5506)
Place of residence
 Urban 1819 33.0 1117 57.1 840 42.9
 Rural 3687 67.0 2959 83.6 580 16.4
(Total missing) (0)
(Total included in the analysis) (5506)
Geopolitical zone
 North Central 839 15.2 566 72.2 218 27.8
 North East 1127 20.5 817 85.5 139 14.5
 North West 1708 31.0 1769 90.1 195 9.9
 South East 504 9.2 230 46.2 268 53.8
 South South 665 12.1 242 45.7 287 54.3
 South West 663 12.0 451 59.0 313 41.0
(Total missing) (0)
(Total included in the analysis) (5506)
Highest educational level
 No education 2543 46.2 2461 93.0 186 7.0
 Primary education 1072 19.5 727 73.4 263 26.6
 Secondary education 1498 27.2 750 51.1 718 48.9
 Higher education 393 7.1 138 35.3 253 64.7
(Total missing) (0)
(Total included in the analysis) (5506)
Wealth index
 Poor 2499 45.4 2320 92.2 197 7.8
 Middle 1077 19.5 761 74.8 257 25.2
 Rich 1930 35.1 995 50.7 966 49.3
(Total missing) (0)
(Total included in the analysis) (5506)
Mother’s occupation
 Not working 1570 28.7 1266 79.8 321 20.2
 Unskilled–low skilled 2369 43.3 1757 72.5 668 27.5
 Middle–high skilled 1529 28.0 1035 71.0 423 29.0
(Total missing) (38)
(Total included in the analysis) (5468)
Mother’s religion
 Catholic 475 8.7 263 52.4 239 47.6
 Orthodox and Protestant 1767 32.2 807 52.0 745 48.0
 Muslim 3188 58.2 2929 87.4 423 12.6
 Traditionalist 48 0.9 49 89.1 6 10.9
(Total missing) (28)
(Total included in the analysis) (5478)
Parity
 1 child 1033 18.8 700 65.6 367 34.4
 2–5 children 3087 56.0 2243 73.0 830 27.0
 ≥ 6 children 1386 25.2 1132 83.5 223 16.5
(Total missing) (0)
(Total included in the analysis) (5506)
ANC attendance
 None 2111 39.5 1965 93.5 136 6.5
 1–3 times 572 10.7 456 79.2 120 20.8
 4–7 times 1330 24.9 875 65.9 452 34.1
 ≥ 8 times 1334 24.9 673 50.8 652 49.2
(Total missing) (159)
(Total included in the analysis) (5347)
SBA
 No 3462 63.1 2998 87.2 440 12.8
 Yes 2023 36.9 1061 52.1 975 47.9
(Total missing) (21)
(Total included in the analysis) (5485)
Maternal PNC
 No 3465 64.2 2959 86.0 482 14.0
 Yes 1930 35.8 1023 53.0 908 47.0
(Total missing) (111)
(Total included in the analysis) (5395)

ANC, antenatal care; PNC, postnatal care; SBA, skilled birth attendance.

The analysis showed that about 61% (60.5%, 3236) of mothers had at least one ANC visit. The prevalence of being fully immunised increased with increasing number of ANC visits (No ANC attendance 6.5%, one to three ANC visits 20.8%, four to seven ANC visits 34.1% and ≥eight ANC visits 49.2%). About 37% (36.9%, 2023) of mothers used SBA at delivery. About 48% (47.9%, 975) of mothers who used SBA had their children fully immunised compared with only 12.8% (440) for mothers who did not use SBA. About 36% (35.8%, 1930) of mothers received PNC. Forty-seven per cent (47.0%, 908) of mothers who received PNC had their children fully immunised compared with only 14.0% (482) for mothers who did not receive PNC.

Bivariate logistic regression results

The crude OR (COR) with 95% CI for the association between immunisation coverage and ANC attendance, SBA and maternal PNC are shown in table 2. Mothers who had one to three ANC visits (COR 3.8, 95% CI 2.92 to 4.97), mothers who had four to seven ANC visits (COR 7.5, 95% CI 6.06 to 9.18) and mothers who had a minimum of eight (≥8) ANC visits (COR 13.9, 95% CI 11.39 to 17.14) were more likely to have their children fully immunised than mothers who had no ANC. Mothers who used SBA were 6.3 times (COR 6.3, 95% CI 5.49 to 7.15) more likely to have their children fully immunised than mothers who used no SBA. Mothers who received PNC were 5.5 times (COR 5.5, 95% CI 4.78 to 6.22) more likely to have their children fully immunised than mothers who received no PNC.

Table 2.

COR with 95% CI* for the association between maternal healthcare utilisation and routine immunisation coverage of children in Nigeria. Total (n)=5506. (Nigeria Demographic and Health Survey 2013)

Variables Frequency Cases n (%) Significant 95% CI*
n Valid (%) Missing (%) p value COR (lower, upper)
ANC attendance 5258 (95.5) 248 (4.5)
 None 2059 1 (Reference)
 1–3 times 561 <0.001 3.8 (2.92 to 4.97)
 4–7 times 1307 <0.001 7.5 (6.06 to 9.18)
 ≥8 times 1331 <0.001 13.9 (11.39 to 17.14)
SBA 5395 (98.0) 111 (2.0)
 No 3384 1 (Reference)
 Yes 2011 <0.001 6.3 (5.49 to 7.15)
Maternal PNC 5308 (96.4) 198 (3.6)
 No 3395 1 (Reference)
 Yes 1913 <0.001 5.5 (4.78 to 6.22)

*All analyses are weighted.

ANC, antenatal care; CI, confidence interval; COR, crude OR; PNC, postnatal care; SBA, skilled birth attendance.

Multivariable logistic regression results

Multivariable logistic regression analyses for each predictor variable individually

The AOR with 95% CI from the multivariable logistic regression analysis for each of the predictor variables individually are shown in table 3, model 1. For ANC attendance, mothers who had one to three ANC visits (AOR 2.4, 95% CI 1.79 to 3.27), mothers who had four to seven ANC visits (AOR 3.2, 95% CI 2.52 to 4.13) and mothers who had ≥eight ANC visits (AOR 3.5, 95% CI 2.64 to 4.50) were more likely to have their children fully immunised than mothers who had no ANC after adjusting for highest educational level, wealth index, geopolitical zone, place of residence, person who decides on mother’s healthcare, parity, mother’s occupation and mother’s age. Regarding skilled birth attendance, mothers who used SBA were 1.9 times (AOR 1.9, 95% CI 1.65 to 2.35) more likely to have their children fully immunised than mothers who used no SBA after adjusting for the same covariates as in model 1 above (table 3, model 1). Mothers who received PNC were 1.7 times (AOR 1.7, 95% CI 1.46 to 2.06) more likely to have their children fully immunised than mothers who received no PNC after adjusting for the same covariates as in model 1 (table 3, model 1).

Table 3.

Stepwise multivariable logistic regression analysis (AOR with 95% CI) for the association between MHC utilisation and routine immunisation coverage of children in Nigeria. Total (n)=5506. (Nigeria Demographic and Health Survey 2013)

Variables Model 1 Model 2 Model 3
AOR (lower, upper) AOR (lower, upper) AOR (lower, upper)
ANC attendance
  None (Reference) (Reference) (Reference)
 1–3 times 2.4 (1.79 to 3.27)* 2.0 (1.51 to 2.74)* 2.3 (1.69 to 3.15)*
 4–7 times 3.2 (2.52 to 4.13)* 2.6 (2.07 to 3.37)* 2.9 (2.22 to 3.76)*
 ≥8 times 3.5 (2.64 to 4.50)* 2.7 (2.05 to 3.53)* 2.9 (2.18 to 3.90)*
SBA
 No (Reference) (Reference) (Reference)
 Yes 1.9 (1.65 to 2.35)* 1.5 (1.27 to 1.83)* 1.4 (1.06 to 1.73)**
Maternal PNC
 No (Reference) (Reference)
 Yes 1.7 (1.46 to 2.06)* 1.2 (0.92 to 1.47)

Model 1: Adjusted for highest educational level, wealth index, geopolitical zone, place of residence, person who decides on mother’s healthcare, parity, mother’s occupation and mother’s age (in years).

Model 2:

ANC: Adjusted for variables in model 1 and SBA.

SBA: Adjusted for variables in model 1 and ANC attendance.

Model 3:

ANC: Adjusted for variables in model 2 and maternal PNC.

SBA: Adjusted for variables in model 2 and maternal PNC.

PNC: Adjusted for variables in model 1, SBA and ANC attendance.

*p<0.001.

**p<0.05.

ANC, antenatal care; AOR, adjusted OR; MHC, maternal healthcare; PNC, postnatal care; SBA, skilled birth attendance.

Stepwise multivariable logistic regression analyses

The adjusted ORs with 95% CI for the stepwise multivariable logistic regression analysis are shown in table 3; models 2 and 3. In model 2, mothers who had one to three ANC visits (AOR 2.0, 95% CI 1.51 to 2.74), mothers who had four to seven ANC visits (AOR 2.6, 95% CI 2.07 to 3.37) and mothers who had ≥eight ANC visits (AOR 2.7, 95% CI 2.05 to 3.53) were more likely to have their children fully immunised than mothers who had no ANC after adjusting for SBA, highest educational level, wealth index, geopolitical zone and mother’s age. Also, mothers who used SBA were 1.5 times (AOR 1.5, 95% CI 1.27 to 1.83) more likely to have their children fully immunised than mothers who used no SBA after adjusting for ANC attendance, highest educational level, wealth index, geopolitical zone, place of residence, person who decides on mother’s healthcare, parity, mother’s occupation and mother’s age (table 3, model 2).

In model 3, mothers who had one to three ANC visits (AOR 2.3, 95% CI 1.69 to 3.15), mothers who had four to seven ANC visits (AOR 2.9, 95% CI 2.22 to 3.76) and mothers who had ≥eight ANC visits (AOR 2.9, 95% CI 2.18 to 3.90) were more likely to have their children fully immunised than mothers who had no ANC after adjusting for SBA, maternal PNC, highest educational level, wealth index, geopolitical zone, place of residence, person who decides on mother’s healthcare and mother’s age. Also, mothers who used SBA were 1.4 times (AOR 1.4, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.73) more likely to have their children fully immunised than mothers who used no SBA after adjusting for ANC attendance, maternal PNC, highest educational level, wealth index, geopolitical zone, place of residence, person who decides on mother’s healthcare, parity, mother’s occupation and mother’s age. There was no significant association with maternal PNC (AOR 1.2, 95% CI 0.92 to 1.47) after adjusting for ANC attendance, SBA, highest educational level, wealth index, geopolitical zone, place of residence, person who decides on mother’s healthcare, parity, mother’s occupation and mother’s age (table 3, model 3).

Discussion

This study examined the impact of MHC utilisation on routine immunisation coverage of children in Nigeria. The percentage of fully immunised children aged 12–23 months was 25.8%, indicating a very low percentage of fully immunised children in Nigeria. However, this study showed that MHC utilisation seemed to be yielding positive results with respect to routine immunisation coverage of children in Nigeria. ANC attendance, SBA and maternal PNC showed significant effect on the child being fully immunised in Nigeria irrespective of socioeconomic status, geopolitical zone, place of residence, parity, person who decides on mother’s healthcare and mother’s age. There was a mediation effect on the association between maternal PNC and the child being fully immunised that led to the disappearance of the significant effect of PNC after adjusting for ANC attendance and SBA.

This study showed that, irrespective of the number of ANC visits by the mother, those who had ANC attendance had higher likelihood of having their children fully immunised than mothers who had no ANC attendance. This is consistent with studies in Senegal,35 Bangladesh,36 Indonesia,37 India,38 and Zimbabwe,39 which showed that ANC attendance of the mother was significantly associated with increased likelihood of a child to be fully immunised. In contrast, Lakew et al 40 showed that ANC attendance was not associated with fully immunised children in Ethiopia.40 Although the finding by Lakew et al 40 stands out among other findings, it calls for caution while making conclusions regarding the impact of ANC attendance on routine immunisation coverage of children. For instance, in that same study, the disappearance of the association of ANC attendance could be due to over adjustment of covariates. However, there could be differentials between countries regarding the impact of ANC attendance on routine immunisation coverage of children due to many factors such as socio-demographic factors and the quality of MHC services.40 41 Despite the differences in documentations of the impact of ANC attendance on routine immunisation coverage of children, the chance of a child to be fully immunised would increase with ANC attendance of the mother.

Regarding the number of ANC visits by the mother, the likelihood of the child to be fully immunised increased with increasing number of ANC visits. This finding is consistent with studies that showed that the likelihood of fully immunised children increased with increasing number of ANC visits in low-income and lower-middle-income countries.42 43 It is important to reiterate that the WHO has increased the recommended number of ANC visits from a minimum of four visits to at least eight visits (ie, the eight-visit model).29 30 44 The minimum of eight ANC visits is to increase the opportunity of early detection and prevention of potential pregnancy complications and other maternal and child health problems.29 30 44 Interestingly, this study has shown that the new eight-visit model of ANC attendance has much higher positive effect on routine immunisation coverage of children than the previous four-visit model; and this can be explained by several factors.

The higher positive effect of the eight-visit model of ANC attendance on the child being fully immunised could be due to greater amount of information about immunisation services, education on the benefits of routine immunisation and better quality of immunisation services which are associated with increasing number of ANC visits.30 45 46 The WHO’s new ANC model stresses clearly the need for mothers to receive relevant, adequate and quality information and care during ANC attendance.30 Studies have shown that a lot of maternal and child health information/education is provided to mothers during ANC attendance.30 46 Hence, with increasing number of ANC visits mothers become increasingly aware of immunisation services and the benefits of immunising their children after delivery. For instance, a study that examined the determinants of immunisation coverage in a district of Nigeria showed that good knowledge of mothers about immunisation and being aware of the benefits of immunisation services were positively associated with fully immunised children.47 Despite the positive effect of the eight-visit model of ANC attendance on the child being fully immunised, close to half of the mothers in this study received no ANC. Therefore, there is a need for appropriate public health interventions such as the establishment of rural health facilities and conditional cash transfer programmes targeted at under-served areas in order to increase ANC attendance among mothers.

This study showed that mothers who used SBA had a higher likelihood of having their children fully immunised than mothers who used no SBA. This finding is consistent with studies that were conducted in low-income and lower-middle-income countries which showed that health facility delivery was positively associated with children being fully immunised.35 37 39 42 48 In contrast, Lakew et al 40 and Herliana and Douiri37 showed that mothers whose babies were delivered in health institutions were less likely to be fully immunised compared with mothers who deliver at home in Ethiopia and Indonesia.37 40 The contrasting findings regarding the effect of mothers’ use of SBA on the child being fully immunised show that health facility delivery without proper implementation of routine immunisation services would not contribute much in increasing routine immunisation coverage of children. Also, the importance of educating mothers on the benefits of routine immunisation for children even in the second phase on the MHC continuum (ie, when using SBA) cannot be overemphasised.30 45

The assessment of the individual effect of SBA indicated that SBA had a lower effect on the child being fully immunised compared with ANC attendance. Many factors could explain this finding. For instance, Chukwuma et al 46 showed that the likelihood of retention in SBA was higher among mothers who received high quality services during ANC attendance compared with mothers who received low quality services during ANC attendance.46Chukwuma et al 46 showed that only 66% of mothers who received ANC continued to use SBA in 28 African countries, inclusive of Nigeria.46 The lower effect of SBA on the child being fully immunised could also be due to insufficient MHC/immunisation communication interventions and socio-demographic factors such as the location of health facility, high cost of health services and cultural practices which could be barriers to mother’s use of SBA which may subsequently lead to a child not being fully immunised.36 40 41 45 49

This study showed that mothers who received PNC had higher likelihood of having their children fully immunised than mothers who received no PNC. This finding is consistent with studies in Ethiopia, Indonesia and in other low-income and lower-middle-income countries which showed that the likelihood of a child to be fully immunised was higher among mothers who received PNC compared with mothers who received no PNC.37 40 42 The disappearance of the significant effect of maternal PNC after adjusting for ANC attendance and SBA could be explained by mediation rather than confounding considering the sequence of MHC, that is, ANC-SBA-PNC; hence, this finding does not suggest that PNC has no effect on the child being fully immunised.

With respect to the impact of MHC utilisation holistically on routine immunisation coverage of children in Nigeria, this study provides a strong evidence of the positive impact of MHC utilisation on routine immunisation coverage of children. This is consistent with Meleko et al 43 which stressed that MHC utilisation was associated with increased likelihood of the child to be fully immunised in Southwest Ethiopia.43

Strengths and limitations

The reliability of this study is increased by the quality of the NDHS woman’s questionnaire which is a carefully developed standard model questionnaire.21 The NDHS which is a nationally representative survey provided a large sample size and high-quality data which reduced the risk of sampling bias and measurement bias in this study. Another strength of this study is in its design; confounding was controlled for through the proper formation of subcategories of the predictor variables and covariates. The consideration of a wide range of covariates in the multivariable logistic regression analysis which reduced the risk of confounding increased the internal validity of this study.50

However, there are a number of limitations in this study. First, the NDHS questionnaires are administered by the interviewers during the survey data collection; hence, the data is prone to interviewer bias which could reduce the internal validity of this study. However, the NDHS questions are standardised and very detailed and therefore reduces the chances of an interviewer bias. Second, the inclusion of immunisation status of the children from verbal reports of the mother might have introduced recall bias into this study because mothers who used MHC may have a better recall than mothers who used no MHC.35 50 Also, recall bias might have been introduced into this study because of the selection of last birth experience of mothers in the 5 years preceding the survey in 2013. Mothers who had more than one child in that period might have difficulty recalling their last birth experience. Furthermore, the inclusion of immunisation status of the children from verbal reports of the mothers might have introduced differential misclassification into this study due to potential under-reporting of children who were not fully immunised. This is because mothers can provide false reports about the immunisation status of their children in the absence of health cards of their children in order to appear socially acceptable.51 Third, there is still a risk of residual confounding even after controlling for confounding in this study. Fourth, the non-exploration of partially immunised children might have led to loss of information regarding routine immunisation coverage in Nigeria. Finally, vaccine stockouts, poor cold chain systems and non-readiness of healthcare providers to administer the vaccines during mothers’ use of maternal health services in Nigeria are provider side barriers to the child being fully immunised, which could have led to an underestimation of the impact of MHC utilisation on routine immunisation coverage found in this study.

Conclusions

This study examined the impact of MHC utilisation on routine immunisation coverage of children in Nigeria. This study has achieved its aim to examine the impact of MHC utilisation on routine immunisation coverage of children in Nigeria. Therefore, reliable conclusions can be drawn from this study. Routine immunisation coverage of children in Nigeria was well below the national immunisation target rate of 80%. ANC attendance of the mother, mother’s use of SBA at delivery and PNC attendance of the mother had positive impact on the child being fully immunised. The findings suggest that strategies aimed at maximising MHC utilisation in Nigeria could be effective in achieving the national coverage target of at least 80% for routine immunisation of children.

Strategies that can maximise MHC utilisation in Nigeria need to focus on promoting access to MHC especially in under-served rural communities. To achieve this, it is important that health facilities are located in close proximity to rural areas in order to reduce the travel time to health facilities. Also, provision of free transportation to health facilities that are located in far distance from rural communities can reduce barriers arising from distance and cost of transportation. Most importantly, provider side barriers can be minimised by ensuring that health professionals who are trained in MHC are available and willing to provide quality care to mothers. Furthermore, other public health interventions such as free maternal health services at the point of care, conditional cash transfer and awareness campaign on the benefits of MHC are needed.

Supplementary Material

Reviewer comments
Author's manuscript

Footnotes

Contributors: OIA: conceptualised the research study, developed the study design, acquired data, analyzed and drafted the manuscript. BOA: involved in developing the study design, interpretation and contributed to the writing of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final draft of the manuscript.

Funding: The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

Competing interests: None declared.

Ethics approval: A request to download and use the NDHS 2013 dataset for this study was submitted to the DHS Program in charge of the dataset. The DHS Program is a United States Agency for International Development (USAID) funded project. The permission to download and use the NDHS 2013 dataset for this study was given. The NDHS 2013 dataset contained no personal information of the respondents. The questionnaires and procedures used in the NDHS 2013 were reviewed and approved by the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) Institutional Review Board in Nigeria. The procedure for informed consent in the NDHS 2013 was that the respondents gave verbal informed consent which was then signed by the interviewer prior to the interview.

Provenance and peer review: Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Data sharing statement: The datasets used for this study are available on request from the DHS Program [at http://dhsprogram.com/data/available-datasets.cfm].

Patient consent for publication: Not required.

References

  • 1. de Castro F, Hubert C, Strand E, et al. Severe functional difficulties and disabilities in children and adolescents and the Sustainable Development Goals. Salud Publica Mex 2017;59:354–60. 10.21149/8487 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Guerrera G. Neonatal and pediatric healthcare worldwide: a report from UNICEF. Clin Chim Acta 2015;451:4–8. 10.1016/j.cca.2015.03.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. United Nations Inter-agency Group for Child Mortality Estimation. Levels & trends in child mortality: report 2017. New York: United Nations Children’s Fund, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Machingaidze S, Wiysonge CS, Hussey GD. Strengthening the expanded programme on immunization in Africa: looking beyond 2015. PLoS Med 2013;10:e1001405–5. 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001405 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Kc A, Nelin V, Raaijmakers H, et al. Increased immunization coverage addresses the equity gap in Nepal. Bull World Health Organ 2017;95:261–9. 10.2471/BLT.16.178327 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Jit M, Dang TT, Friberg I, et al. Thirty years of vaccination in Vietnam: Impact and cost-effectiveness of the national Expanded Programme on Immunization. Vaccine 2015;33:A233–A239. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.12.017 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Oyo-Ita A, Wiysonge CS, Oringanje C, et al. Interventions for improving coverage of childhood immunisation in low- and middle-income countries. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016;7:1–93. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Henderson RH. The expanded programme on immunization of the world health organization. Rev Infect Dis 1984;6:S475–S479. 10.1093/clinids/6.Supplement_2.S475 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Wiysonge CS, Uthman OA, Ndumbe PM, et al. A bibliometric analysis of childhood immunization research productivity in Africa since the onset of the Expanded Program on Immunization in 1974. BMC Med 2013;11:1–10. 10.1186/1741-7015-11-66 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Babaniyi OA. A 10-year review of morbidity from childhood preventable diseases in Nigeria: how successful is the expanded programme on immunization (EPI)? An update. J Trop Pediatr 1990;36:306–13. 10.1093/tropej/36.6.306 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Duclos P, Okwo-Bele JM, Gacic-Dobo M, et al. Global immunization: status, progress, challenges and future. BMC Int Health Hum Rights 2009;9:S2 10.1186/1472-698X-9-S1-S2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Sorungbe AO. Expanded Programme on Immunization in Nigeria. Rev Infect Dis 1989;11:S509–S511. 10.1093/clinids/11.Supplement_3.S509 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Gunnala R, Ogbuanu IU, Adegoke OJ, et al. Routine vaccination coverage in northern nigeria: results from 40 district-level cluster surveys, 2014-2015. PLoS One 2016;11:e0167835–14. 10.1371/journal.pone.0167835 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Morakinyo OM, Fagbamigbe AF. Neonatal, infant and under-five mortalities in nigeria: an examination of trends and drivers (2003-2013). PLoS One 2017;12:e0182990–21. 10.1371/journal.pone.0182990 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Akinyemi JO, Bamgboye EA, Ayeni O. Trends in neonatal mortality in Nigeria and effects of bio-demographic and maternal characteristics. BMC Pediatr 2015;15:1–12. 10.1186/s12887-015-0349-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Oluoha C, Umeh C, Ahaneku H. Assessing the contributions of private health facilities in a pioneer private-public partnership in childhood immunization in Nigeria. J Public Health Africa 2014;5:40–2. 10.4081/jphia.2014.297 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Obasola OI, Mabawonku IM. Women’s use of information and communication technology in accessing maternal and child health information in Nigeria. Afr J Libr Arch Inform Sci 2017;27:1–15. [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Akinyemi JO, Afolabi RF, Awolude OA. Patterns and determinants of dropout from maternity care continuum in Nigeria. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2016;16:1–11. 10.1186/s12884-016-1083-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Ushie BA, Fayehun OA, Ugal DB. Trends and patterns of under-5 vaccination in Nigeria, 1990-2008: what manner of progress? Child Care Health Dev 2014;40:267–74. 10.1111/cch.12055 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Erchick DJ, George AS, Umeh C, et al. Understanding internal accountability in nigeria’s routine immunization system: perspectives from government officials at the national, state, and local levels. Int J Health Policy Manag 2017;6:403–12. 10.15171/ijhpm.2016.150 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. National Population Commission Nigeria. Nigeria demographic and health survey 2013. 2014. https://dhsprogram.com/pubs/pdf/fr293/fr293.pdf
  • 22. Mallick L, Tukur D, Kerry LDM. Trends in maternal health care in Nigeria, 2003 - 2013. 2016. https://dhsprogram.com/pubs/pdf/FA102/FA102.pdf
  • 23. United Nations. Sustainable development goals. 2017. http://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/sustainable-development-goals/
  • 24. Antai D. Rural-urban inequities in childhood immunisation in Nigeria: The role of community contexts. Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med 2011;3:82–9. 10.4102/phcfm.v3i1.238 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Kazungu JS, Adetifa IMO. Crude childhood vaccination coverage in West Africa: Trends and predictors of completeness. Wellcome Open Res 2017;2:12–23. 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.10690.1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Moyer CA, Benyas D, Rominski S. The relationship between facility-based delivery and infant immunization in sub-Saharan Africa. Afr J Reprod Health 2016;20:27–33. 10.29063/ajrh2016/v20i2.3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Ataguba JE, Ojo KO, Ichoku HE. Explaining socio-economic inequalities in immunization coverage in Nigeria. Health Policy Plan 2016;31:1212–24. 10.1093/heapol/czw053 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Eboreime E, Abimbola S, Bozzani F. Access to routine immunization: a comparative analysis of supply-side disparities between Northern and Southern Nigeria. PLoS One 2015;10:e0144876–10. 10.1371/journal.pone.0144876 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. World Health Organization. WHO recommendations on antenatal care for a positive pregnancy experience. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2016. a. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Tunçalp Ӧ, Pena-Rosas JP, Lawrie T, et al. WHO recommendations on antenatal care for a positive pregnancy experience-going beyond survival. BJOG 2017;124:860–2. 10.1111/1471-0528.14599 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. World Health Organization. WHO Recommendations on Postnatal Care of the Mother and Newborn. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2013. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Bowers D. Medical Statistics from Scratch: An Introduction for Health Professionals. 3rd ed Chichester: John Wiley, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Pallant J. SPSS survival manual: a step by step guide to data analysis using IBM SPSS. 5th ed Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  • 34. USAID. Standard Recode Manual for DHS 6. 2013. https://www.dhsprogram.com/pubs/pdf/DHSG4/Recode6_DHS_22March2013_DHSG4.pdf
  • 35. Mbengue MAS, Sarr M, Faye A, et al. Determinants of complete immunization among senegalese children aged 12-23 months: evidence from the demographic and health survey. BMC Public Health 2017;17:630–8. 10.1186/s12889-017-4493-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Boulton ML, Carlson BF, Power LE, et al. Socioeconomic factors associated with full childhood vaccination in Bangladesh, 2014. Int J Infect Dis 2018;69:35–40. 10.1016/j.ijid.2018.01.035 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Herliana P, Douiri A. Determinants of immunisation coverage of children aged 12–59 months in Indonesia: a cross-sectional study. BMJ Open 2017;7:e015790–14. 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015790 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Sahu D, Pradhan J, Jayachandran V, et al. Why immunization coverage fails to catch up in India? A community-based analysis. Child Care Health Dev 2010;36:332–9. 10.1111/j.1365-2214.2009.01003.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Mukungwa T. Factors associated with full immunization coverage amongst children aged 12 – 23 months in Zimbabwe. African Population Studies 2015;29:1761–74. 10.11564/29-2-745 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Lakew Y, Bekele A, Biadgilign S. Factors influencing full immunization coverage among 12-23 months of age children in Ethiopia: evidence from the national demographic and health survey in 2011. BMC Public Health 2015;15:1–8. 10.1186/s12889-015-2078-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Oleribe O, Kumar V, Awosika-Olumo A, et al. Individual and socioeconomic factors associated with childhood immunization coverage in Nigeria. Pan Afr Med J 2017;26:1–14. 10.11604/pamj.2017.26.220.11453 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Restrepo-Méndez MC, Barros AJ, Wong KL, et al. Missed opportunities in full immunization coverage: findings from low- and lower-middle-income countries. Glob Health Action 2016;9:30963–6. 10.3402/gha.v9.30963 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Meleko A, Geremew M, Birhanu F. Assessment of child immunization coverage and associated factors with full vaccination among children aged 12–23 months at Mizan Aman Town, Bench Maji Zone, Southwest Ethiopia. Int J Pediatr 2017;2017:1–11. 10.1155/2017/7976587 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. World Health Organization. Opportunities for Africa’s Newborns. Cape Town: Mills Litho, 2016. b. [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Oku A, Oyo-Ita A, Glenton C, et al. Factors affecting the implementation of childhood vaccination communication strategies in Nigeria: a qualitative study. BMC Public Health 2017;17:200–11. 10.1186/s12889-017-4020-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Chukwuma A, Wosu AC, Mbachu C, et al. Quality of antenatal care predicts retention in skilled birth attendance: a multilevel analysis of 28 African countries. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2017;17:152–62. 10.1186/s12884-017-1337-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Adedire EB, Ajayi I, Fawole OI, et al. Immunisation coverage and its determinants among children aged 12-23 months in Atakumosa-west district, Osun State Nigeria: a cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health 2016;16:1–8. 10.1186/s12889-016-3531-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Moyer CA, Tadesse L, Fisseha S. The relationship between facility delivery and infant immunization in Ethiopia. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2013;123:217–20. 10.1016/j.ijgo.2013.06.030 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Narváez J, Osorio MB, Castañeda-Orjuela C, et al. Is Colombia reaching the goals on infant immunization coverage? A quantitative survey from 80 municipalities. Vaccine 2017;35:1501–8. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2017.01.073 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Aschengrau A, Seage GR. Essentials of epidemiology in public health. 3rd ed Burlington: Jones, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Leggett CG, Kleckner NS, Boyle KJ, et al. Social desirability bias in contingent valuation surveys administered through in-person interviews. Land Econ 2003;79:561–75. 10.2307/3147300 [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Reviewer comments
Author's manuscript

Articles from BMJ Open are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES