Abstract
Meat and meat products are important foods with essential nutritional components such as essential amino acids, fatty acids, vitamins and minerals that form a significant component for the normal physiological and biochemical processes. However, the main drawback of meat and meat products is the absence of dietary fibre and the presence of saturated fat. Value improvement can be done by the incorporation of functional ingredients into the meat products. The use of functional ingredients in meat products offers processors the opportunity to enhance the functional and nutritional value of their products. Vegetable proteins, dietary fibre, cereal by-products, fruits, legumes, spices, herbs, and lactic acid bacteria that have been used alone or in combination for the enhancement of the functional value of meat and meat products were studied. Hence, the current review focuses on the functional ingredients incorporated in meat products
Keywords: Enrichment, functional ingredients, meat, processing, value addition
Background
Foods are important and suitable vehicles for the human being to convey the essential nutrients that may improve their health. Animal meat is of high biological value and a good source of proteins in many countries. Meat and meat products are ideal sources of soluble minerals, vitamins, essential fats, amino acids and many other nutrients having a specific function to the body 1. There is an increasing demand for healthier meat and meat products containing low levels of fat, cholesterol, reduced content of sodium chloride and nitrite, updated fatty acid profile composition and added health-enhancing ingredients among consumers worldwide. Recently, there is an increasing concern about health-oriented functional meat products as a result of drawbacks incorporated with muscle foods and its related health hazards. Meat is a good source of omega-3 fatty acids, proteins, vitamin B12 and high levels of iron 2. Meat and meat products can be modified by the addition of certain ingredients that eliminate or reduce harmful components from the body and are thus beneficial to health. Meat products incorporated with dietary fibres are best meat substitutes because of their functional and nutritional values 3. Goat meat is the most staple red meat taken in human diets. It is universally accepted but influenced by traditions and socioeconomic conditions; as a result, influencing customer preference 4, 5. Goat meat and beef were also slightly more liked due to preferences for texture and muscles. Goat meat is dark red with a coarse texture and has a noticeable variety of flavour and aroma from lamb and beef 6, 7. According to the consumer, meat and meat product consumption is unhealthy due to the presence of cholesterol, synthetic antioxidants; antimicrobial contents that result in some degenerative diseases and saturated fats 8.
Functional food is mainly a conventional food, which is consumed as a part of a usual diet. The term functional food was firstly used by Japan in the 1980s to dedicate food products that are fortified with specific constituents with beneficial physiological effects 9. Foods that are marketed under functional category contain added technologically developed ingredients 10, and important biologically active compounds 11. These foods provide health benefits by mediating specific physiological functions in the body and are marketed and consumed for this value-added property. Reformulation of meat is achieved by the addition of fibres, proteins, polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA), antioxidants, etc. A functional food should possess certain requirements, i.e. it should be derived from a naturally occurring ingredient; consumed as a part of a regular diet and should be involved in the regulation of certain human process such as age delaying, risk prevention from diseases and improvement in immunological abilities 12. Sometimes in functional foods, one or more additional ingredients are added, that shows health benefits above and beyond as compared to those of regular foods 13. Functional food is widely used in developed countries due to their high shelf life, advanced food technology, health benefits, and known importance. Food nowadays is not only eaten for hunger satisfaction and necessary nutrition but also for preventing nutrition-related disorders and for mental-physical well being of an individual 14. Hence, food nutritionist and technologist are targeting to develop functional meat products with great efforts that possess natural antioxidants and antimicrobials, low fat, lesser sodium content, enriched with dietary fibres and ω-3 and ω-6 fatty acids 15 as shown in Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Characteristics of functional meat products
Incorporation of dietary fiber:
The plant-based derivatives like fruits, nuts, vegetables, herbs, and spices are mainly used now a day for the production of modified and healthier meat products with improved shelf life. Dietary fibers and antioxidants addition are the most approaching step in the development of novel meat products. The fiber incorporation is on demand because of its technological use and benefits to human health 16. Foods with high dietary fiber proportion are reported to reduce the risk of obesity, colon cancer, cardiovascular diseases and various other disorders 17 as shown in Figure 2. Various dietary fibers have been used in meat products for determination of proper beneficial health effects and also as potential fat substitutes 18.
Figure 2.
Effect of Fiber in diet
Dietary fibers (DF) are defined as residues of eatable plant fragments and carbohydrates that can't be absorbed or assimilated and are indigestible in the small intestine of human 19. It promotes important physiological effects such as laxation and blood glucose and cholesterol attenuation 20. Dietary fibers are composed of various categories of ingredients namely oligosaccharides and polysaccharides, i.e., cellulose, hemicelluloses, pectic materials, inulin, lignin and other components like waxes, phytates, cutin, saponins, and resistant proteins and polyphenols 21. Various DF sources are wheat, oat, and rice bran; sugar beet; soy; brewer's spent grain; pea; vegetables; cereal grains; woody plants; fruits; legumes; leguminous plants, psyllium, etc. have been incorporated in the recipes of certain meat products namely meatballs, patties, and sausages for nutritious daily regime improvement. DF incorporation in meat products improves functional properties such as water retention, lubrication, rheological properties, emulsion stability, neutral flavor and modification in texture 22. It also improves cooking yield, reduces formulation costs and enhances the palatability. Dietary Fiber intake through meat substituted with fruits, vegetables, and certain grains protects against cardiovascular diseases, diverticulitis, constipation, irritable colon, colon cancer and diabetes 23. Dietary fibers also act as a fat replacer. It also decreases plasma and LDLcholesterol levels, reduces the risk of dietary related problems like obesity, coronary diseases, gastrointestinal disorders, i.e., constipation, inflammatory bowel diseases, etc 24. Various food industries manufacture modified energy-dense foods by adding vegetable and fruit fibers. Fiber addition in meat products is considered as suitable and thus increases the cooking yield and texture in cooked meat products because of its water and fat binding properties 12. Supplementation of DF increases the bulk and reduces cooking losses in meat products. It offers no or fever changes in textural parameters by improving water-binding abilities and also enhances economic advantages for the consumers and processors 25. The dietary fiber in meat products is mainly considered clinically better as compared to that of traditional meat products 22. Also, the incorporation of dietary fiber in meat products leads to the development of novel meat products. Various types of dietary fibers improve the quality of the meat products are given in Table 1.
Table 1. Functional ingredients as fiber content in meat products.
| S. No | Functional ingredients | Developed Product | Effect on meat product quality | Reference |
| 1 | Pumpkin | Chicken Sausages | Fiber enrich product | [26] |
| 2 | Psyllium husk | Chicken burger patties | Improve Dietary fiber content and reduces fat cholesterol content | [27] |
| 3 | Flax seed oil and rice bran | Beef burger patties | Diminish total lipid and saturated fatty acid | [28] |
| Improve dietary fiber | ||||
| 4 | Carrot and Lemon Fiber | beef hamburger | Low fat and cholesterol content | [29] |
| 5 | Green banana and soybean hulls flours | Chicken nuggets | Improve dietary fiber and boost instrumental texture and color properties | [30] |
| 6 | Guava | Sheep Meat Nuggets | Improve antioxidant and dietary fiber | [31] |
| 7 | Psyllium husk and fenugreek leaves | Goat meat patties | Improve fiber content and antioxidant properties | [32] |
| 8 | Glutinous rice flour | Beef patties | Improve texture quality | [33] |
| 9 | Flax seed and tomato paste | Beef patties | Improve fatty acid profile and nutritional properties | [34] |
| 10 | Carrots and Oats | Chicken meat cutlet | Higher moisture, lower free fatty acid | [35] |
| 11 | Finger Millet Flour (eleusinecoracana) | Chicken patties | Improve cooking yield, and moisture retentions. | [36] |
Addition of antioxidants:
Meats and meat products are mainly prone to deterioration as they are rich in nutritional composition 37 and moisture content 38. Addition of spices, herbs, and vegetables extract to raw and cooked meat enhance total antioxidant capacity that is considered important criteria for the shelf life of the meat products, decrease lipid oxidation and improve colour stability 14. Lipid oxidation decreases food's nutritional quality due to loss of essential fatty acids and vitamins and results in a toxic reaction in the muscles foods such as malonaldehyde (MDA) and COPs, i.e. cholesterol oxidation products 39, 40. There are various methods for controlling lipid oxidation, among which use of natural antioxidants are the most reliable, effective, convenient and economical. An antioxidant such as herb stabilizes food lipids and thereby inhibits the quality deterioration of the products and also increases the shelf life of the products. Herbs also reduce risk of diseases and promote healthy well being due to their role to protect the body against oxidative damage. Antioxidants are those substances which, when present in food or the body at low concentrations delays or prevent an oxidative process that leads to quality deterioration in food and initiates degenerative diseases in the body. Lipid oxidation may occur via auto-oxidation, photooxidation, thermal oxidation, and enzymatic oxidation and mostly involve free radicals and other reactive species as the intermediate 41. Auto-oxidation is the reaction between atmospheric oxygen and lipids and is one of the common causes behind the oxidative deterioration of food and biological systems. The thermal oxidation refers to the process that can be accelerated at higher temperatures as experienced during deep fat frying. It leads to elevated levels of free fatty acids and polar matters, foaming, color, and viscosity. The process that involves photo sensitizer excitation and transfer of energy to lipid molecules or oxygen are mainly referred to as photo-oxidation. Enzymes, such as lipoxygenases also catalyze fatty acid oxidation and are usually inactivated in thermal processing of food. Natural antioxidants are derived from plants, animals and microorganisms and synthetic materials from chemicals. Plants and their constituents are natural inhabitants of antioxidants like tocopherols and polyphenols found mainly in spices, herbs, fruits, vegetables, cereals, grains, seeds, teas, and oils. Some antioxidants are also of marine origin, i.e., from algae, shellfish and marine bacteria 42, 41. By-products obtained from the food and agricultural industries have been reported for their potential use as antioxidants like hulls; shells and skins of nuts and cereals; citrus peels and seeds; canola meal. Fish viscera extracts have also been found to possess antioxidant activity 43. Synthetic antioxidants are derived from chemicals namely butylated hydroxyanisole (BHA), butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT), propyl gallate (PG) and tertiary-butyl hydroquinone (TBHQ) has been extensively used as food preservatives because of their low cost and bland flavor. Primary oxidation of lipid in meat products leads to cardboard flavor and with progress results in the development of rancid and oxidized flavor 44. Antioxidant-rich sources are mainly fruits and vegetables 45, 46 and serve as a natural source of antioxidants in meat products. It contains water-soluble vitamin such as ascorbic acid, flavonoids as well as fat-soluble vitamins and precursors like tocopherols and carotenoids. Antioxidants are chemical compounds that donate hydrogen to the free radicals and reduce rancidity and delayed lipid per-oxidation without altering sensory or nutritional properties of meat products 47. It has been reported that in last few years for meat product preservation butylated hydroxyanisole (BHA), butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT) and tertiary butyl hydroquinone (TBHQ) have been used as a synthetic antioxidant 48. However, synthetic chemicals used as an antioxidant often result in adverse effects on human health. So, the consumers are interested in the natural source of antioxidant for the application in meat products. Many studies reveal the addition of natural antioxidant in meat products improved the antioxidant properties and colour stability, reduced lipid oxidation, which improves the shelf life of the products (Table 2).
Table 2. Functional ingredients as a natural antioxidant in different types of meat products.
| S.N | Functional ingredients | Developed Product | Effect on meat product quality | Reference |
| 1 | Aqueous extract curry leave and fenugreek leaves | Raw chicken meat products | Improve antioxidant activity | [49] |
| 2 | Clove powder | Chicken patties | Anti microbial properties | [50] |
| 3 | Pomegranate rind powder | Chicken patties | Antioxidant potential | [51] |
| 4 | Guava | Sheep�Meat Nuggets | Improve antioxidanrt and dietryfiber | [52] |
| 5 | Tea polyphenol | Pork sausages | Antioxidant antimicrobial properties,Inhibit TBARs value | [53] |
| 7 | Rosemary extract | Raw and precooked pork sausages | Delay TBARS value | [54] |
| 8 | Extracts of kinnow rind, pomegranate rind and seed powders | Goat Meat Patties | Antioxidant | [55] |
| 9 | Fenugreek Seed Flour | Beef burger | Antioxidant and Antimicrobial properties | [56] |
| 11 | Broccoli powder extract | Goat meat products | Antioxidant�effect | [57] |
| 12 | Ground mustard | Chicken nuggets | Lower TBARS value, anti microbial properties | [58] |
Conclusion
Meat and meat products are good sources of protein that suffices the requirement of an individual. In order to enhance the nutritional quality, texture, flavour, color and shelf life of the meat products the inclusion of functional ingredients is of paramount importance. The incorporation of the functional ingredient in meat products reduces the possibilities of risk to chronic diseases. The increasing concept of using food for health benefits along with nutrition gives new opportunity to the meat industry. The addition of dietary fibre and natural herbs, which serve as a potential source of fibre and anti-oxidants respectively, fulfills the demand of the consumers for foods with functional value. Hence, the known functional ingredients in meat products are summarized in this report.
Conflict of Interest
Authors declare no conflict of interest.
Acknowledgments
Authors would like thanks University Grant Commission (UGC) for Junior Research Fellowship (UGC-JRF) for the financial assistant.
Edited by P Kangueane
Citation: Kausar et al. Bioinformation 15(5): 358-363 (2019)
References
- 1.Biesalski HK. Meat Science . 2005;70:509. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2004.07.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Bender AE. FAO Food Nutr Pap., . 1992;53:1. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Kumar V, et al. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. . 2010;461:122. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Webb EC, et al. Small ruminant research . 2005;60:153. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Arain MA, et al. Pakistan Journal of Nutrition . 2010;9:422. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Schonfeldt HC, et al. Meat Science . 1993;34:363. doi: 10.1016/0309-1740(93)90084-U. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Schonfeldt HC, et al. Meat Sci. 1993;34:381. doi: 10.1016/0309-1740(93)90085-V. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Serrano A, et al. Trends Food Sci Technology . 2007;12:401. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Stanton C, et al. Curr. Opin. Biotech. . 2005;16:198. doi: 10.1016/j.copbio.2005.02.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Niva M. Appetite . 2007;483:384. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2006.10.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Drozen M, Harrison T. Nutraceuticals World, . 1998;1:18. [Google Scholar]
- 12.Cofrades S, et al. J Food Sci, . 2000;652:281. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Stauffer CE. Baking Snack . 1998;20:44. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Diplock AT, et al. British Journal of nutrition . 1999;81:1. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Hygreeva D, et al. Meat Science . 2014;98:47. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2014.04.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Vendrell-Pascuas S, et al. Journal of Chromatography A . 2000;881:591. doi: 10.1016/s0021-9673(00)00351-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.National Cancer Institute. Report from US Department of Health and Human Services . 1984;85:2711. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Mansour EH, Khalil AH. Food Res. Int. 1997;30:199. [Google Scholar]
- 19.Prosky L. Trends Food SciTechnol. 1999;10:271. [Google Scholar]
- 20.AACC. AACC report. Cereal Foods World . 2001;46:112. [Google Scholar]
- 21.Elleuch M, et al. Food Chem, . 2011;124:411. [Google Scholar]
- 22.Mehta N, et al. J Food SciTechnology . 2015;52:633. [Google Scholar]
- 23.Schatzkin A, et al. Am J Clinical Nutrition . 2007;85:1353. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/85.5.1353. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Streppel MT, et al. Arch Intern Med, . 2005;165:150. doi: 10.1001/archinte.165.2.150. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Grigelmo-Miguel N. Meat Science . 1999;52:247. doi: 10.1016/s0309-1740(98)00173-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Zargar FA, et al. SpringerPlus . 2014;3:39. doi: 10.1186/2193-1801-3-39. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Mehta et. Haryana Veterinarian . 2013;52:6. [Google Scholar]
- 28.Ibrahium MI, et al. Sciences. 2015;5:645. [Google Scholar]
- 29.Soncu ED, et al. Korean journal for food science of animal resources . 2015;35:370. doi: 10.5851/kosfa.2015.35.3.370. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Kumar V, et al. Journal of food science and technology . 2013;50:1058. doi: 10.1007/s13197-011-0442-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Verma AK, et al. Asian-Australasian journal of animal sciences . 2013;26:886. doi: 10.5713/ajas.2012.12671. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Kausar T, et al. Biochem. Cell. Arch. . 2018;2:1569. [Google Scholar]
- 33.Yi HC, et al. Meat science . 2012,;924:464. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2012.05.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Valenzuela-Melendres M, et al. CyTA-Journal of Food . 2018;16:263. [Google Scholar]
- 35.Gupta R, et al. International Journal of Food and Fermentation Technology . 2017;71:41. [Google Scholar]
- 36.Naveena BM, et al. Journal of Muscle Foods . 2006;171:92. [Google Scholar]
- 37.Devatkal et. J Food Sci Technol. . 2011;48:472. doi: 10.1007/s13197-011-0256-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Enan G1, et al. International Journal of Food Microbiology . 1996;30:189. doi: 10.1016/0168-1605(96)00947-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Morrissey PA, et al. Meat Science . 1998;49:73. [Google Scholar]
- 40.Tang S, et al. International Journal of Food Science and Technology . 2001;36:685. [Google Scholar]
- 41.Shahidi F, Amarowicz R. Journal of the American Oil Chemists Society . 1996;73:1197. [Google Scholar]
- 42.Athukorala Y, et al. Journal of Food Lipids, . 2003;10:251. [Google Scholar]
- 43.Borderias AJ, et al. Trends Food Sci Technol. 2005;16:458. [Google Scholar]
- 44.Angelo A, et al. Journal of Food Science . 1990;55:1501. [Google Scholar]
- 45.Phillips RW, et al. Cancer Research . 1993;53:3723. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Slattery ML, et al. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 2000;71:575. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/71.2.575. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Lahucky R, et al. Journal of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists International . 2010;87:718. [Google Scholar]
- 48.Faseseas MK, et al. Food Chemistry . 2007;106:1188. [Google Scholar]
- 49.Devatkal SK, et al. Journal of food science and technology. 2012;49:781. doi: 10.1007/s13197-011-0511-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Kumar D, Tanwar VK. Journal of Stored Products and Postharvest Research. 2011;2:11. [Google Scholar]
- 51.Naveena BM, et al. International journal of food science and technology . 2008;43:1807. [Google Scholar]
- 52.Verma AK, et al. Asian-Australasian journal of animal sciences . 2013;26:886. doi: 10.5713/ajas.2012.12671. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Wenjiao F, et al. Journal of Food science and Technology . 2014;51:191. doi: 10.1007/s13197-013-1076-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Sebranek JG, et al. Meat science . 2005;69:289. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2004.07.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Devatkal SK, et al. Meat Science . 2010;85:155. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2009.12.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Hegazy AI. World Journal of Agricultural Sciences . 2011;7:391. [Google Scholar]
- 57.Banerjee R, et al. Meat science. 2012;91:179. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2012.01.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Devendra K, Tanwar VK. Journal of food science and technology . 2011;48:759. doi: 10.1007/s13197-010-0149-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]


