Abstract
MicroRNAs (miRNAs) have been recognized as a key regulator in plant development and metabolism. Recent reports showed that the miRNAs of medicinal plants not only act as a critical modulator in secondary metabolism but also had a great potential of performing cross-kingdom gene regulation. Although several plant miRNA repositories have been publicly available, no miRNA database specific for medicinal plants has been reported to date. Here, we report the first version of MepmiRDB (medicinal plant microRNA database), which is freely accessible at http://mepmirdb.cn/mepmirdb/index.html. This database accommodates thousands of miRNA candidates belonging to 29 medicinal plant species. The miRNA information on sequences, expression patterns and regulatory networks has been included in the functional modules of the database. Specifically, the ‘Sequence’ module provides the sequences of the mature miRNAs and their precursors, and the structure information of the precursors. Moreover, the processing and small RNA accumulation signals on the miRNA precursors are also included in the ‘Sequence’ module. The organ/growth condition-specific expression information of the mature miRNAs has been stored in the ‘Expression’ module. The ‘Interaction’ module offers the information of the degradome-validated miRNA—target pairs of eight plant species. The ‘Search’ module enables users to search for the miRNAs by plant species and miRNA families, or by sequences. All data in this database are available for download. Taken together, the functional modules of MepmiRDB ensure its importance and timeliness for mechanistic and functional studies on the medicinal plant miRNAs.
Introduction
MicroRNAs (miRNAs) play critical roles in diverse biological processes of plants, such as growth and development, stress response and metabolism (1). Currently, there are several databases accommodating information of plant miRNAs, such as miRBase (2), PMRD (3), miRNEST (4), miREX (5), PmiRKB (6) and PNRD (7). However, to date, no database has been established specifically for the miRNAs of medicinal plants. Here, we report the first version of MepmiRDB (medicinal plant microRNA database) including 29 medicinal plant species, most of which are listed in the pharmacopoeia of the People’s Republic of China (8).
Increasing pieces of evidence point to the pivotal role of plant miRNAs in modulating the biosynthesis and accumulation of secondary metabolites (9, 10). It is particularly important for the medicinal plants since a dominant portion of the bioactive ingredients are produced through the secondary metabolic pathways (11–14). On the other hand, miRNAs have become a charming candidate for therapeutic management of cancer and other intractable diseases (15). Notably, several reports indicated the ability of plant miRNAs in cross-kingdom communication (16–19), and some studies showed the high stability of certain ingested miRNAs during circulation in human or animal bloodstream (20–22). These lines of evidence point to the possibility that the exogenous, plant-derived miRNAs could perform target regulation in human body. In this regard, the miRNAs emerged as the bioactive components of medicinal plants (23–25). Taken together, the above-mentioned points formed the driving force for design and construction of MepmiRDB, which has been freely available online (http://mepmirdb.cn/mepmirdb/index.html).
Database construction and contents
The database structure has been illustrated in Figure S1 and S2. Five major functional modules, including ‘Sequence’, ‘Expression’, ‘Interaction’, ‘Search’ and ‘Download’, are available in MepmiRDB (Figure 1A) and are described below.
The ‘Sequence’ module
Sequence information of thousands of the miRNAs belonging to 29 plant species was included in this module. All of the miRNAs were predicted by using the recently published workflow PmiRDiscVali (26). These miRNAs were generally divided into conserved and non-conserved ones. By comparing to all of the plant miRNAs registered in miRBase (release 21), the sRNAs with identical sequences were extracted from the sRNA-seq (small RNA sequencing) data sets, and were regarded as the conserved miRNAs existed in specific medicinal plants (Figure 2A for example). Besides, 86 RNA-seq datasets of 23 plant species were employed for transcriptome assembly by Trinity (trinityrnaseq_r20140717, default parameters) (27). The assembled transcripts were served as the basic data for miRNA precursor discovery by using miRDeep-P (v1.3, default parameters) (28). We noticed that a large portion of the miRDeep-P predictions belonged to the non-conserved miRNAs (Table 1), suggesting that these miRNA candidates might be evolutionarily young or species-specific.
Table 1.
Organism | miR_total | miR_miRBase | miR_miRDP | miR_(miRBase ∩ miRDP) | Pri-miR_miRDP | Pre-miR_miRDP |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Actinidia chinensis (ach) | 141 | 141 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Ammopiptanthus mongolicus (amo) | 456 | 332 | 151 | 27 | 148 | 76 |
Aquilaria sinensis (asi) | 235 | 202 | 44 | 11 | 23 | 22 |
Catharanthus roseus (cro) | 217 | 166 | 68 | 17 | 38 | 37 |
Citrus sinesis (csi) | 948 | 470 | 530 | 52 | 641 | 273 |
Carthamus tinctorius (cti) | 287 | 250 | 42 | 5 | 22 | 21 |
Dimocarpus longan (dlo) | 195 | 154 | 55 | 14 | 30 | 30 |
Dendranthema morifolium (dmo) | 497 | 199 | 312 | 14 | 317 | 168 |
Dendrobium officinale (dof) | 669 | 283 | 408 | 22 | 370 | 225 |
Eucommia ulmoides (eul) | 313 | 313 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Ginkgo biloba (gbi) | 438 | 298 | 150 | 10 | 106 | 77 |
Juglans regia (jre) | 329 | 224 | 148 | 43 | 176 | 88 |
Litchi chinensis (lch) | 298 | 219 | 85 | 6 | 84 | 43 |
Lonicera japonica (lja) | 315 | 161 | 171 | 17 | 140 | 117 |
Lycium chinense (lyc) | 298 | 245 | 67 | 14 | 41 | 35 |
Nelumbo nucifera (nnu) | 627 | 453 | 207 | 33 | 198 | 107 |
Oenanthe javanica (oja) | 25 | 25 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Panax ginseng (pgi) | 249 | 117 | 135 | 3 | 167 | 77 |
Punicai granatum (pgr) | 261 | 258 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 2 |
Paeonia lactiflora Dafugui (plaD) | 192 | 192 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Paeonia lactiflora Hongyanzhenghui (plaH) | 154 | 154 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Paeonia lactiflora Zifengyu (plaZ) | 163 | 163 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Panax notoginseng (pno) | 339 | 281 | 66 | 8 | 45 | 34 |
Papaver somniferum (pso) | 164 | 138 | 26 | 0 | 14 | 13 |
Ricinus communis (rco) | 178 | 159 | 34 | 15 | 29 | 18 |
Raphanus sativus (rsa) | 124 | 120 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Salvia miltiorrhiza (smi) | 345 | 220 | 143 | 18 | 122 | 75 |
Taxus mairei (tma) | 180 | 132 | 49 | 1 | 25 | 25 |
Taxus x media (tme) | 581 | 315 | 281 | 15 | 257 | 145 |
An overview of the sequence characteristics shows that around 50% of the miRNA candidates start with 5’ U and are 21 nt in length (Figure 1B and C), which is consistent with the known sequence features of plant miRNAs (1).
Degradome-seq data is useful for tracking the processing signals of miRNA precursors (29, 30). For eight plant species with degradome-seq data, the ‘Sequence’ module provides the detectable processing signals on the secondary structures of the pri-miRNAs (Figure 2C and D). Additionally, sRNA expression levels on the miRNA precursors were achieved by mapping the sRNA-seq data onto the pri-miRNAs. In many cases, the highly enriched accumulation regions of the sRNAs correlated well with the mature miRNA-coding regions, indicating the high reliability of the pri-miRNA candidates (Figure 2C and D).
The ‘Expression’ module
The module provides the organ/growth condition-specific expression information of the mature miRNA candidates (Figure 2B).
The ‘Interaction’ module
For the eight species with degradome-seq data, miRNA target prediction was performed by using the psRNATarget algorithm (2017 Update, default parameters) (31), treating the assembled transcripts and the mature miRNA candidates as the input data. Then, the predicted miRNA–target pairs were subject to degradome-seq data-based validation according to the previously reported method (32). As a result, 380 pairs involving 119 miRNAs and 47 target transcripts in Ammopiptanthus mongolicus, 2341 pairs involving 192 miRNAs and 208 targets in Citrus sinesis, 13 023 pairs involving 389 miRNAs and 4506 targets in Dendrobium officinale, 6933 pairs involving 216 miRNAs and 2968 targets in Nelumbo nucifera, 9660 pairs involving 143 miRNAs and 2009 targets in Panax ginseng, 1560 pairs involving 130 miRNAs and 864 targets in Salvia miltiorrhiza, 149 pairs involving 72 miRNAs and 55 targets in Taxus mairei and 262 pairs involving 22 miRNAs and 98 targets in Taxus × media were identified. For each pair, t-plot (target plot) showing target cleavage signal(s) and visual network showing regulatory relationship between the miRNA and its target are available for users (Figure 2E and F). Besides, the transcripts interacting with the miRNA targets at the protein level were retrieved from the STRING database (33) by using BLASTX (34) (v2.2.26, E-value <1e-3, query coverage >50%, identity >35%). As a result, the protein–protein interactions were also visible in the regulatory networks (Figure 2E).
The ‘Search’ module
The module enables users to search for the miRNAs by plant species and miRNA families, or by sequences. For sequence search, it enables users to perform either ‘exact’ or ‘fuzzy’ search.
Other functional modules
The ‘Statistics’ module provides users with statistical information in both table and figure formats. Besides, all of the sequence and expression information reported in MepmiRDB has been made freely available in the ‘Download’ module. A help document is available in the ‘Help’ module for the first-time visitors.
Conclusion
All of the modules provided by MepmiRDB ensure its importance and timeliness for mechanistic and functional studies on the medicinal plant miRNAs. It is foreseeable that MepmiRDB will attract wide attention from medical and pharmaceutical researchers, and plant biologists.
Availability
MepmiRDB database is freely available at http://mepmirdb.cn/mepmirdb/index.html. We recommend the visitors to use the browsers like Mozilla Firefox, Google Chrome and Safari.
Supplementary data
Supplementary data are available at Database Online.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank all the publicly available datasets and the scientists behind them.
Database URL: http://mepmirdb.cn/mepmirdb/index.html
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China (81730108, 31601062 and 31771436); Major Increase Or Decrease Program In The Central Finance Level (2060302); Key Project of Zhejiang Province Ministry of Science and Technology (2015C03055); Key Project of Hangzhou Ministry of Science and Technology (20162013A07).
Conflict of interest. None declared.
References
- 1. Jones-Rhoades M.W., Bartel D.P. and Bartel B. (2006) MicroRNAs and their regulatory roles in plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol., 57, 19–53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Kozomara A. and Griffiths-Jones S. (2014) miRBase: annotating high confidence microRNAs using deep sequencing data. Nucleic Acids Res., 42, D68–D73. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Zhang Z., Yu J., Li D. et al. (2010) PMRD: plant microRNA database. Nucleic Acids Res., 38, D806–D813. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Szczesniak M.W. and Makalowska I. (2014) miRNEST 2.0: a database of plant and animal microRNAs. Nucleic Acids Res., 42, D74–D77. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Bielewicz D., Dolata J., Zielezinski A. et al. (2012) mirEX: a platform for comparative exploration of plant pri-miRNA expression data. Nucleic Acids Res., 40, D191–D197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Meng Y., Gou L., Chen D. et al. (2011) PmiRKB: a plant microRNA knowledge base. Nucleic Acids Res., 39, D181–D187. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Yi X., Zhang Z., Ling Y. et al. (2015) PNRD: a plant non-coding RNA database. Nucleic Acids Res., 43, D982–D989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. The Pharmacopoeia Editorial Committee (2015) Pharmacopoeia of the People’s Republic of China. Chemical Technology Press, Shanghai, China. [Google Scholar]
- 9. Bulgakov V.P. and Avramenko T.V. (2015) New opportunities for the regulation of secondary metabolism in plants: focus on microRNAs. Biotechnol. Lett., 37, 1719–1727. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Gupta O.P., Karkute S.G., Banerjee S. et al. (2017) Contemporary understanding of miRNA-based regulation of secondary metabolites biosynthesis in plants. Front. Plant Sci., 8, 374. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Boke H., Ozhuner E., Turktas M. et al. (2015) Regulation of the alkaloid biosynthesis by miRNA in opium poppy. Plant Biotechnol. J., 13, 409–420. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Vashisht I., Mishra P., Pal T. et al. (2015) Mining NGS transcriptomes for miRNAs and dissecting their role in regulating growth, development, and secondary metabolites production in different organs of a medicinal herb, Picrorhiza kurroa. Planta, 241, 1255–1268. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Yu Z.X., Wang L.J., Zhao B. et al. (2015) Progressive regulation of sesquiterpene biosynthesis in arabidopsis and patchouli (Pogostemon cablin) by the miR156-targeted SPL transcription factors. Mol. Plant, 8, 98–110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Zhang M., Dong Y., Nie L. et al. (2015) High-throughput sequencing reveals miRNA effects on the primary and secondary production properties in long-term subcultured Taxus cells. Front. Plant Sci., 6, 604. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Rupaimoole R. and Slack F.J. (2017) MicroRNA therapeutics: towards a new era for the management of cancer and other diseases. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov., 16, 203–222. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Li J., Zhang Y., Li D. et al. (2015) Small non-coding RNAs transfer through mammalian placenta and directly regulate fetal gene expression. Protein Cell, 6, 391–396. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Sala-Cirtog M., Marian C. and Anghel A. (2015) New insights of medicinal plant therapeutic activity—the miRNA transfer. Biomed. Pharmacother., 74, 228–232. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Chin A.R., Fong M.Y., Somlo G. et al. (2016) Cross-kingdom inhibition of breast cancer growth by plant miR159. Cell Res., 26, 217–228. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Zhao Y., Cong L. and Lukiw W.J. (2018) Plant and animal microRNAs (miRNAs) and their potential for inter-kingdom communication. Cell. Mol. Neurobiol., 38, 133–140. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Arroyo J.D., Chevillet J.R., Kroh E.M. et al. (2011) Argonaute2 complexes carry a population of circulating microRNAs independent of vesicles in human plasma. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 108, 5003–5008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Liang G., Zhu Y., Sun B. et al. (2014) Assessing the survival of exogenous plant microRNA in mice. Food Sci. Nutr., 2, 380–388. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Yang J., Farmer L.M., Agyekum A.A. et al. (2015) Detection of dietary plant-based small RNAs in animals. Cell Res., 25, 517–520. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Hong M., Wang N., Tan H.Y. et al. (2015) MicroRNAs and Chinese medicinal herbs: new possibilities in cancer therapy. Cancers, 7, 1643–1657. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Zhou Z., Li X., Liu J. et al. (2015) Honeysuckle-encoded atypical microRNA2911 directly targets influenza A viruses. Cell Res., 25, 39–49. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Xie W., Weng A. and Melzig M.F. (2016) MicroRNAs as new bioactive components in medicinal plants. Planta Med., 82, 1153–1162. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Yu D., Wan Y., Ito H. et al. (2019) PmiRDiscVali: an integrated pipeline for plant microRNA discovery and validation. BMC Genomics, 20, 133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Grabherr M.G., Haas B.J., Yassour M. et al. (2011) Full-length transcriptome assembly from RNA-Seq data without a reference genome. Nature Biotechnol., 29, 644–652. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Yang X. and Li L. (2011) miRDeep-P: a computational tool for analyzing the microRNA transcriptome in plants. Bioinformatics, 27, 2614–2615. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Ma X., Tang Z., Qin J. et al. (2015) The use of high-throughput sequencing methods for plant microRNA research. RNA Biol., 12, 709–719. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Yu D., Ma X., Zuo Z. et al. (2017) Bioinformatics resources for deciphering the biogenesis and action pathways of plant small RNAs. Rice, 10, 38. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Dai X. and Zhao P.X. (2011) psRNATarget: a plant small RNA target analysis server. Nucleic Acids Res., 39, W155–W159. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Shao C., Chen M. and Meng Y. (2013) A reversed framework for the identification of microRNA-target pairs in plants. Brief. Bioinform., 14, 293–301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Szklarczyk D., Morris J.H., Cook H. et al. (2017) The STRING database in 2017: quality-controlled protein-protein association networks, made broadly accessible. Nucleic Acids Res., 45, D362–D368. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Altschul S.F., Madden T.L., Schaffer A.A. et al. (1997) Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res., 25, 3389–3402. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.