In PNAS, Li et al. (1) suggest that Cu is a member of a different branch of high- cuprate superconducting materials. This branch is characterized as heavily overdoped with an exceptionally short Cu apical O spacing and O vacancies that are located in the planes. These characteristics, illustrated in Fig. 1, differ in significant ways from those of the traditional cuprate superconducting materials (2).
For example, consider (LSCO), which has the same structure as Cu. Using a valence count with , , and , the number of holes in the Cu shell of LSCO is . For , LCO is antiferromagnetic. As Sr is added the antiferromagnetic Néel temperature decreases as shown in Fig. 1A and superconductivity onsets with peaking at a small doping . At larger doping, as the system moves further away from the antiferromagnetic Mott–Hubbard phase, decreases and vanishes for . For Cu, the valence of Ba is so that the hole doping . Thus, the sample Li et al. (1) discuss is heavily overdoped with . Nevertheless, the of Cu is approximately 30 K higher than that of optimally doped LSCO.
Like the previously reported highly overdoped cuprate materials (3–8) Cu, Cu, and , Cu is synthesized under high pressure and high temperature in the presence of a strong oxidizing agent. While the crystal has the structure illustrated in the center of Fig. 1B, the octahedron structure is highly compressed with a much shorter Cu–O apical distance (1.86 Å) than the traditional cuprates (2.42 Å for ). This is schematically illustrated at the left and right in Fig. 1B. The shortening of the Cu–O apical distance raises the energy of the orbital so that in Cu the Cu states near the Fermi level have both and orbital character. As the authors note, a shortened apical Cu–O distance and the admixing of orbital weight in the states near the Fermi energy are found to reduce in the traditional cuprate superconductors (9).
Finally, the authors note at the end of the legend for figure 3 in ref. 1 that while the exact positions of the O vacancies are not known at present, they are in the planes. This agrees with the conclusions of Geballe and Marezio (5) regarding the O vacancies in Cu. A number of earlier studies Li et al. (1) cite assume that the oxygen vacancies were at the apical O sites. In this case, while there would be pyramidal structures and square fourfold coordinated along with the octahedral units, the planes would survive intact as illustrated in the right-hand structure of Fig. 1B. However, if the oxygen vacancies are in the planes one will have Cu–O chain structures rather than the planes as indicated in the left-hand structure of Fig. 1B. The 2D planes, consisting of corner-shared units, are considered the key structural elements of the traditional cuprate superconductors. They are the defining characteristic of these superconductors and imperfections in these layers are known to reduce .
As noted, Cu is made under high pressure and temperature resulting in polycrystalline samples and the precise location of the oxygen vacancies in the plane remains open. Nevertheless, the remarkably high of this highly overdoped cuprate with its short Cu apical O separation and its O vacancies in the plane suggest that it is a member of a different branch of high- cuprate materials, which challenges the basic tenants of many high-Tc theories.
Acknowledgments
I thank Thomas Maier and Tom Berlijn for their help with the figure and for useful discussions. This work was supported by the Scientific Discovery through Advanced Computing (SciDAC) program funded by the US Department of Energy, Office of Science, Advanced Scientific Computing Research and Basic Energy Sciences, Division of Materials Sciences and Engineering.
Footnotes
The author declares no conflict of interest.
See companion article on page 12156.
References
- 1.Li W. M., et al. , Superconductivity in a unique type of copper oxide. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 116, 12156–12160 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 2.Gupta S. K., Jangam H., Sharma N., Review of high temperature superconductors and application in various fields. Res. Dev. Mater Sci. 7, 000668 (2018). [Google Scholar]
- 3.Hiroi Z., Takano M., Azuma M., Takeda Y., A new family of copper oxide superconductors stabilized at high pressure. Nature 364, 315–317 (1993). [Google Scholar]
- 4.Liu Q. Q., et al. , Enhancement of the superconducting critical temperature of Cu up to 95 K by ordering dopant atoms. Phys Rev B 74, 100506(R) (2006). [Google Scholar]
- 5.Geballe T. H., Marezio M., Enhanced superconductivity in Cu Physica C 469, 680–684 (2009). [Google Scholar]
- 6.Gao W. B., et al. , Out-of-plane effect on the superconductivity of Cu with up to 98 K. Phys. Rev. B 80, 094523 (2009). [Google Scholar]
- 7.Liu Y., et al. , A new modulated structure in Cu superconductor synthesized under high pressure. Physica C 497:34–37 (2014). [Google Scholar]
- 8.Gauzzi A., et al. , Bulk superconductivity at 84 K in the strongly overdoped regime of cuprates. Phys. Rev. B 94, 180509 (R) (2016). [Google Scholar]
- 9.Pavarini E., et al. , Band-structure trend in hole-doped cuprates and correlations with Tcmax. Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 047003 (2001). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]