Abstract
Biofilms are microbial communities encased in a protective matrix composed of exopolymeric substances including exopolysaccharides, proteins, lipids, and extracellular DNA. Biofilms cause undesirable effects such as biofouling, equipment damage, prostheses colonization, and disease. Biofilms are also more resilient than free-living cells to regular decontamination methods and therefore, alternative methods are needed to eradicate them. The use of non-thermal atmospheric pressure plasmas is a good alternative as plasmas contain reactive species, free radicals, and UV photons well-known for their decontamination potential against free microorganisms. Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms colonize catheters, indwelling devices, and prostheses. Plasma effects on cell viability have been previously documented for P. aeruginosa biofilms. Nonetheless, the effect of plasma on the biofilm matrix has received less attention and there is little evidence regarding the changes the matrix undergoes. The aim of this work was to study the effect plasma exerts mostly on the P. aeruginosa biofilm matrix and to expand the existing knowledge about its effect on sessile cells in order to achieve a better understanding of the mechanism/s underlying plasma-mediated biofilm inactivation. We report a reduction in the amount of the biofilm matrix, the loss of its tridimensional structure, and morphological changes in sessile cells at long exposure times. We show chemical and structural changes on the biofilm matrix (mostly on carbohydrates and eDNA) and cells (mostly on proteins and lipids) that are more profound with longer plasma exposure times. We also demonstrate the presence of lipid oxidation products confirming cell membrane lipid peroxidation as plasma exposure time increases. To our knowledge this is the first report providing detailed evidence of the variety of chemical and structural changes that occur mostly on the biofilm matrix and sessile cells as a consequence of the plasma treatment. Based on our results, we propose a comprehensive model explaining plasma-mediated biofilm inactivation.
Introduction
Biofilms are surface-associated microbial communities encased in a protective matrix composed of exopolymeric substances (EPS) including exopolysaccharides, proteins, lipids, and extracellular DNA (eDNA). Biofilm formation takes place in several steps starting with free-living (planktonic) bacteria recognizing a surface, and ending in the development of a mature biofilm with a characteristic tridimensional architecture in which multicellular aggregates are surrounded by water channels forming a primitive circulatory system [1]. Bacterial biofilms produce about 90 percent of infections in humans and 65 percent of nosocomial infections according to the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and The Center for Disease Control (CDC) respectively [2]. Biofilms cause biofouling, water contamination, pipe plugging, product contamination, and equipment damage in industries; prostheses colonization, dental plaque, and disease in humans [3]. Biofilms also colonize burned tissue and open wounds.
Decontamination methods proven effective for free-living bacteria are typically ineffective against biofilms. Various mechanisms explain the resilience of biofilms to almost all forms of sterilization [4]. Therefore, new methods are required to solve the problem of biofilm eradication. Non-thermal atmospheric pressure plasmas is a methodology that shows promising results against biofilms and that has been researched for more than a decade [2,5–18]. Plasmas contain a mixture of reactive species, free radicals, and UV photons well-known for their decontamination potential against free microorganisms.
The effect plasma exerts on cell viability has been previously documented [5–10,13]. However, the effect on the biofilm matrix has received less attention and there is little evidence regarding the changes the matrix undergoes. Extracellular matrices are as diverse as biofilms and they contribute to the organization and the integrity of the community [19] and also to the resistance phenotype of the biofilm [20,21]. The contribution of each component of the EPS to the integrity of the matrix is not clearly understood at the molecular level. However, several functions of the EPS have been determined [22].
Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a biofilm-forming opportunistic pathogen that colonizes catheters, indwelling devices, and prostheses. The bacterium preys on victims with compromised immune systems such as patients on respirators, infects burned tissue, produces chronic rhinosinusitis [23], and colonizes lung tissue contributing to mortality in cystic fibrosis patients [24]. P aeruginosa co-colonizes lung tissue contributing to mortality in cystic fibrosis patients [24]. The eradication of Pseudomonas biofilms has been studied through a variety of approaches including surface modification [25,26], the use of antibiotics and biocides [27,28]; the use of chelators [29]; compounds such as furanone and N-acyl homoserine lactones [30,31] and also, the use of bacteriophages [32–34].
P. aeruginosa produces at least three matrix polysaccharides that differ in their chemical structure, function, and biosynthesis: Alginate, Psl, and Pel. Alginate is an O-acetylated linear β-(1→4)-linked polymer of D-mannuronic acid and its epimer L-guluronic acid [35]. Pel is a glucose-rich and cellulase-sensitive extracellular polysaccharide [36]. Lastly, Psl consists of a repeating pentasaccharide of D-mannose, D-glucose, and L-rhamnose [37]. P. aeruginosa PAO1 strain predominantly produces Psl associated to the matrix stability but it can also generate Pel [38]. Another component of the biofilm matrix is eDNA. Many contributions highlight the importance of eDNA in adhesion to surfaces and biofilm development [39]. It has been reported that eDNA functions as an intercellular connector in P. aeruginosa biofilms.
In most biofilms, less than 10% of the dry mass corresponds to microorganisms, whereas more than 90% accounts for the matrix [22]. In the tridimensional biofilm structure, the EPS function as a diffusion barrier for chemical compounds and antimicrobial agents and it is supposed to act as a complex defensive mechanism protecting bacteria from unfavorable environmental conditions [11]. The matrix also protects organisms against UV radiation, desiccation, oxidizing agents, some antibiotics and biocides, metallic cations, and host immune defenses, among others [22].
We preliminary reported the effects of a He plasma jet on the P. aeruginosa matrix using atomic force microscopy, AFM [2,8,40]. Vandervoort and Brelles-Mariño [2] studied the topography of plasma-treated P. aeruginosa biofilms and observed that under the conditions tested, the area corresponding to the matrix was reduced in the case of plasma-treated biofilms and that after 30 min of plasma treatment there were no structured areas that could putatively be assigned to the matrix. The researchers hypothesized that plasma could reduce the matrix areas by oxidation or peroxidation of the exopolysaccharides in the matrix by the reactive oxygen species present in the plasma. The reduction or eventual loss of the matrix would reduce the adhesiveness of the biofilm to the surface to which it is anchored and would lead to the disorganization or disintegration of the biofilm tridimensional structure. It was demonstrated that the adhesiveness of the matrix to the tip of an AFM cantilever varied throughout the biofilm surface and was reduced after plasma treatment. Similar effects were also reported by Ziuzina et al. [11,12] using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM). They demonstrated that an extended plasma treatment had a detrimental effect on the viability of P. aeruginosa both by disintegrating bacterial cells and also the biofilm matrix. Ziuzina et al. [11] reported a reduction in the thickness of plasma-treated biofilms compared to non-treated controls.
We have used a dielectric barrier discharge (DBD) plasma source operating in humidified air to treat P. aeruginosa biofilms and characterized the chemical composition of the effluent gas [18,41]. A similar DBD configuration has been proven effective against biofilms by other authors [11,12,42]. These authors, similarly to Vandervoort and Brelles-Mariño [2], observed a reduction of the biofilm thickness upon plasma treatment and concluded that although the exact mechanism of the plasma bactericidal mechanism is yet to be elucidated, the presence of RONS might be involved in the disintegration.
The aim of this work was to study the effect plasma exerts mostly on the P. aeruginosa biofilm matrix and to expand the existing knowledge about its effect on sessile cells in order to achieve a better understanding of the mechanism/s underlying plasma-mediated biofilm inactivation. In this paper we report a reduction in the amount of the biofilm matrix and the loss of its tridimensional structure together with major morphological changes in sessile cells at long exposure times. We report chemical and structural changes on the biofilm matrix (mostly on carbohydrates and eDNA) and cells (mostly on proteins and lipids) that are more profound with longer plasma exposure times. We also demonstrate the presence of lipid oxidation products thus confirming cell membrane lipid peroxidation as plasma exposure time increases. To our knowledge, this is the first report providing detailed evidence of the variety of chemical and structural changes that occur mostly on the biofilm matrix but also on sessile cells as a consequence of the plasma treatment. Based on our results, we propose an expanded model to explain plasma-mediated biofilm inactivation.
Materials and methods
Strain and culture medium
All the experiments were carried out with Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1 strain grown in AB minimal medium supplemented with 0.5% w/v glucose, unless otherwise stated [43]. Inocula were prepared from a plate in AB medium and grown in a shaker at 37°C and 180 rpm.
Biofilm growth
For most of the experiments and unless otherwise stated, P. aeruginosa biofilms were grown on stainless-steel 316L 12.7 mm-diameter coupons in the CDC biofilm reactor (BioSurface Tech., MT) as described by Soler-Arango et al. [18]. Briefly, the biofilm reactor was inoculated with an overnight bacterial suspension grown in AB liquid broth to an optical density (OD) at 550 nm of 0.1 within the reactor vessel and operated under batch culture system at 37°C and 130 rpm for 24 h. Fresh medium was pumped thereafter through the biofilm reactor at a flow of 0.6 mL/min and spent medium was removed at the same rate. The flow was controlled with a LKB Bromma 2120 Varioperpex pump. The reactor operated as a chemostat with a fixed volume of 350 mL until constant OD for 24 h. After this time, coupons were aseptically removed from the reactor and unbound bacteria were removed by rinsing the coupons twice with sterile saline solution. Coupons were air-dried for 10 min and then placed biofilm side up into empty Petri dishes for treatment.
Plasma generation and operating conditions
Atmospheric-pressure gas discharge plasma was produced using a DBD plasma reactor as described elsewhere [18]. Briefly, the plasma device has a coaxial geometry and a DBD configuration. The inner electrode consists of a 1 mm-diameter iron wire inside a 6 mm-external diameter glass capillary tube sealed at the tip. The outer electrode is a 25 mm-long aluminum tape attached to a 1 mm-thick acrylic 10 mm-diameter tube. The outer electrode is grounded. The ac power supply is a commercially available transformer for neon light (8 kV, 70 mA, and 50 Hz) connected to a variable autotransformer (Variac) to control the operating voltage amplitude.
The discharge operated with the power source at its maximum voltage of 8 kV (voltage amplitude at open circuit). Each electrode was connected to one of the two high-voltage transformer outputs and it was out of phase with the other one (16 kV between electrodes). The voltage was determined with a high voltage probe (Tektronix 1000 X /3.0 pf/100 MΩ) connected to the inner electrode. Current measurements were performed with a transformer (Bergoz CT-D5.0-B). These electrical waveforms were registered with a two-channel digitizing oscilloscope with a bandwidth of 60 MHz and a sampling rate of 1 Gs/s. As described in a previous contribution [18], air was used for plasma generation and the electric discharge took place at the interelectrode region and consisted of a series of short-lived filamentary micro-discharges. Typical waveforms of current and voltage applied to the inner electrode during the discharge showed the filamentary character of the discharge and also the existence of current peaks in the order of 10 mA with a negligible displacement current of ~ 0.01 mA superimposed [41].
In a previous contribution we characterized our plasma source by optical emission spectroscopy and detected the presence of excited N2 bands and N2+ ions and the formation of O3, H2O2 and NO3- in the plasma afterglow [41].
For the biofilm experiments, the plasma applicator was mounted such that the discharge was 4 mm away from the coupon. The discharge was generated in moistened air at a flow of 1 L/min. Air was moistened by passing it through a humidifier filled with water and the air flow was determined using a commercial flow meter. The relative humidity of the air was 80 ± 5%. Humidity was determined with an analog hygrometer (Luft48HIG-DH) at the plasma applicator gaseous output. The temperature reaching the surface of the coupon was assessed with a thermocouple.
Calcofluor White staining of the biofilm matrix
Calcofluor White staining (Calcofluor White M2R and Evans Blue 0.5 g/L, Sigma-Aldrich) was used to stain the biofilm matrix. Biofilms were grown and processed as described in section 2 and plasma-treated for 0, 3, 15, and 30 min. Then, 15 μL of a 1:1 mixture of Calcofluor White and 10% w/v potassium hydroxide were added to each coupon which was further incubated for 1 min in the dark. Stained biofilms were visualized with a Leica epifluorescence microscope using a 355/433 nm excitation/emission filter. Images were acquired with the Leica Application Suite (2.5.0 R1) with a 400X magnification and image analyses were performed with the ImageJ free software [44].
Simultaneous staining of sessile cells and the biofilm matrix with SYTO9 and Calcofluor White
SYTO9 and Calcofluor White dyes were used to simultaneously stain biofilm cells and the biofilm matrix respectively. Biofilms were grown and processed as described above and plasma-treated for 0, 3, and 30 min. Coupons were covered with 15 μL of the SYTO9 stain and incubated in the dark for 20 min at room temperature. Excess dye was removed with sterile paper towels. Then, 15 μL of a 1:1 mixture of Calcofluor White and 10% w/v potassium hydroxide were added to the coupons that were further incubated in the dark for 1 min. Excess dye was removed as indicated before. Coupons were visualized with a Leica epifluorescence microscope using a 355/433 nm excitation/emission filter for Calcofluor White and a 480/500 nm filter for SYTO9. Images were acquired with the Leica Application Suite (2.5.0 R1) with a 400X magnification and image analyses were performed with the ImageJ free software.
Digital treatment of the biofilm matrix and biofilm cell images
Once images were acquired as described above, the ImageJ software was used to determine the ratio between the areas of the biofilm matrix and the areas corresponding to biofilm cells. The digital treatment consisted of transforming the color images to a scale of grays and then binarizing them. Image binarization converts the grey scale in a black and white image (0 or 1) clearing the background and preserving the image details. In this case, we determined the area corresponding to black pixels. The ratio between the area of the binarized image of the biofilm matrix and the area of the binarized image of the biofilm cells was determined. The same procedure was carried out for plasma-treated and control biofilms.
Scanning electron microscopy
Biofilms were grown on stainless steel coupons placed in a 24-well polypropylene microplate (Greiner CELLSTAR Sigma Aldrich). Each well was inoculated with 2 mL of a bacterial suspension in LB medium at a final OD550nm of 0.1 and the microplate statically incubated for 24 h at 37°C. Then coupons were rinsed with 1 mL of sterile saline, air-dried, and plasma-treated for 0, 3, and 30 min. Samples were fixed in 2.5% (v/v) glutaraldehyde for 30 min and then rinsed in water to remove excess reagent. Dehydration was carried out by placing the coupons in a series of increasing concentration of cold ethanol solutions. The ethanol concentration in the dehydrating solution was 30, 50, 70, 90, and 95% v/v and each iteration lasted 20 min. Two additional increments at 100% ethanol for 20 min each were added to ensure complete ethanol saturation. All samples were critical-point dried in an EMITECH K850 dryer displacing ethanol with liquid CO2 and further evaporated at 31.1°C and 1072 psi. A ~15–20 nm gold sputter-coating was accomplished in a Balzers SCD 030 apparatus, and images were obtained using a SEM Philips 505 scanning electron microscope.
Enzymatic degradation of matrix eDNA prior to plasma treatment
Biofilms were grown on stainless-steel coupons in the CDC biofilm reactor in AB medium under the conditions described in a previous section. Coupons were removed from the reactor, rinsed twice with sterile saline, air-dried for 10 min followed by the addition of 20 μL of bovine pancreas DNAse I (0.1 mg/mL) (Sigma-Aldrich); and a further incubation at 30°C for 60 min. The enzyme suspension was then removed with sterile paper towels and the coupons rinsed three times with 50 μL of sterile saline and air-dried for plasma treatment. Coupons were further treated with humidified air plasma for 0 (control), 3, 15, and 30 min, placed in a wet chamber, and incubated with 35 μL of sterile saline for 10 min. Two controls were included: one with enzyme but no plasma treatment, and one with neither enzyme nor plasma treatment. Biofilms were then scraped off and suspended in 1 mL of sterile saline, serially diluted, and 100 μL of each suspension was plated in duplicates on AB medium. Plates were incubated at 37°C and evaluated for colony-forming-unit (CFU) formation by counting the colonies. Survival curves (log10 CFU/mL versus plasma exposure time) were constructed and the decimal reduction time (D-value) calculated.
Statistical analyses
The ratio between the area of the black pixels on the binary image of the biofilm matrix and the corresponding area of the biofilm cells was subjected to ANOVA analysis and t-Tukey test (S1 Table). The area of the FT-IR peaks corresponding to primary and secondary lipid oxidation products was also subjected to ANOVA analysis and t-Tukey test (S2 Table). The assumptions of normality and homocedasticity for the ANOVA were contrasted with the Kolmogorov-Smirmov test for normality, and the Levene test for the homogeneity of variances. ANOVA analysis and t-Tukey test (α = 0.05) to compare means were carried out using STATISTICA (StatSoft, 2011) software.
Fourier Transform Infrared spectroscopy (FTIR)
Biofilm growth
For FT-IR analysis, biofilms were grown in sterile 24-wells polystyrene microplates. Each well was inoculated with an overnight culture of P. aeruginosa in AB liquid broth to an OD550nm = 1 in a 2 mL final volume. The microplate was statically incubated for 24 h at 37°C. Spent medium was removed and wells were rinsed twice with sterile saline solution. Biofilms were air-dried for 10 min and further subjected to plasma treatment for 0, 3, and 30 min under sterile conditions.
Sample preparation and data acquisition
Biofilms grown on 24-wells polystyrene microplates were scrapped off and suspended in 100 μL of sterile saline after plasma treatment. The material recovered from two wells was pooled, deposited onto a ZnSe optical plate (13 mm diameter, Korth Kristalle GMBH, Germany) and air-dried for 1 h to obtain transparent films [45]. Three independent experiments or biological replicas were carried out. Each independent assay consisted of three technical replicates for each plasma exposure time (0, 3, and 30 min).
FT-IR absorption/transmission (A/T) spectra were acquired in the 4,000 to 600 cm−1 range with a FT-IR spectrometer (Bruker IFS 66, Bruker Optics) with 6 cm-1 spectral resolution and 64 scan co-additions [45,46]. To avoid interference with spectral water vapor bands, spectra were measured under a continuous purge of dried air.
Data pre-processing
All the acquired spectra were first subjected to a quality test (QT) using OPUS software [45]. This test included checking i) the absorbance in the amide I region (1,700–1,600 cm−1) with acceptable values between 0.20 and 1.20 absorbance units; ii) the noise signal (calculated from the first derivative between 2,100 and 2,000 cm−1) with values lower than 1.5×10−4; iii) the water vapor content (determined from the first derivatives between 1,847 and 1,837 cm−1) with values lower than 3×10−4. Only spectra that passed the QT were subjected to a pre-processing procedure. First, technical replicates were averaged getting three average spectra for each biological replicate and for each plasma exposure time (nine replicates in total). Then, second derivatives were calculated on these averaged spectra using the Savitzky-Golay algorithm with 9-point smoothing [45,47,48]. This procedure was carried out to increase the number of discriminative features inside the broad spectral bands, to help in the band assignment, and to minimize problems with baseline shifts. Finally, to avoid interference from biomass variations among the different samples, the second derivatives were vector-normalized in the full range. OPUS software (versions 4.2; and 7.0 Bruker Optics GmbH, Ettlingen, Germany) was used for spectral pre-processing.
Data analysis
Different cluster analyses (CA) were carried out in order to determine the heterogeneity and/or variability among different FT-IR spectra. For this purpose, the vector-normalized second-derivatives of the nine average spectra (see above) were used as input data. The spectral distance values were calculated at different wavenumber ranges as indicated in each case using the “scaling to first range” method, and clustering was carried out using Ward´s algorithm or average linkage. OPUS software was used for the analysis.
Semi-quantitative evaluation of the primary and secondary lipid oxidation products was determined calculating the band areas at the two main peaks: 1,745 cm−1 (1,780–1,735 cm−1 region) and 1,715 cm−1 (1,730–1,710 cm−1 region) in the three vector-normalized average spectra obtained for each plasma exposure time. As these two bands overlap under the shoulder of the amide I band at 1,743 cm-1, the areas were calculated after a deconvolution and fitting procedure. The frequencies and the half-width of each peak used for a least-squares iterative curve-fitting procedure were those obtained from the second derivative of the original spectra [49]. The areas of the bands were calculated by integration of the corresponding fitted bands. Data preprocessing, curve fitting, and peak-area calculation were carried out with the OPUS software.
To determine the heterogeneity among the FT-IR spectra, the variability in the biological replicates of each plasma exposure time was calculated as previously described [45]. Briefly, the spectral variance was determined as the average ±2 standard deviations of the so-called spectral distance (D). D corresponds to a dissimilarity measure, equal to (1-r) × 1000, being r the Pearson's correlation coefficient [47]. The spectral distances, calculated in the whole spectral range (3,000–2,800 cm−1; 1,800–1,550 cm−1; 1,500–1,250 cm−1 and 1,200–900 cm−1) were 3.40 ± 1.91, 3.53 ± 0.93 and 2.51 ± 2.17 for P. aeruginosa biofilms exposed to plasma for 0 (control), 3, and 30 min respectively (see S1 Fig). Spectral distances higher than the cut-off number of D = 6 (marked with dotted lines in dendrograms) indicate that plasma produced significant changes in the structure or chemical composition of the samples analyzed.
Results and discussion
The amount of biofilm matrix is reduced after plasma treatment
Calcofluor White is a non-specific fluorochrome that binds to a variety of polysaccharides and has been used to stain the biofilm extracellular matrix. The dye strongly interacts with glycosydic bonds mainly β-(1→4) and β-(1→3) [50].
Fig 1 shows microscopy images of P. aeruginosa biofilm matrices stained with Calcofluor White. Control biofilms with no plasma exposure and biofilms treated with plasma for 3 min show big dense aggregates of matrix. Biofilms treated with plasma for 15 and 30 min depict a more disperse and disorganized matrix.
Fig 2 shows the simultaneous staining of the biofilm with Calcofluor White and SYTO9. The green fluorescent nucleic acid stain SYTO9 stains live and dead bacterial cells while Calcofluor White stains predominantly matrix. Images show numerous cells covered and surrounded by matrix in the control biofilm (0 min plasma treatment). There are still abundant cells and matrix upon a 3-min plasma treatment whereas the amount of polysaccharidic matrix is drastically reduced after treating the biofilm with plasma for 30 min.
In order to quantify changes in the biofilm matrix and sessile cells after plasma treatment, double-stained images were binarized with the ImageJ software. Fig 3 shows biofilms treated with plasma for 0, 3, and 30 min and stained either with Calcofluor White or SYTO 9. Images were first digitally converted into a scale of grays and then into black and white pixels for further analysis.
Table 1 shows the ratio between the area of the binarized image of the biofilm matrix and the area of the binarized image of the biofilm cells. For biofilms not exposed to plasma, the ratio is ˃ 1.5 indicating a higher amount of matrix compared to sessile cells. The ratio decreases upon plasma treatment and drops to figures closer to 0.5 for biofilms exposed to plasma for 30 min.
Table 1. Ratio between the biofilm matrix area and the sessile cells area obtained from binary images of plasma-treated biofilms.
Plasma exposure time (min) | matrix area/cells area |
---|---|
0 | 1.75 ± 0.12 a |
3 | 1.05 ± 0.13 b |
30 | 0.46 ± 0.10 c |
Ratio between the black pixel area in the binary image of the biofilm matrix stained with Calcofluor White and the black pixel area in the binary image of the biofilm cells stained with SYTO9. Biofilms were treated with plasma for 0, 3, and 30 min prior to staining. Images were binarized as indicated in Fig 3. Means are the average of the ratio of areas from 40 pictures acquired in 4 independent experiments. Different letters correspond to significantly different means (p<0.001).
Most of the studies on plasma-mediated biofilm eradication focus on the effect of plasma on bacterial sessile cells and very few refer to the damage inflicted to the biofilm matrix. We previously reported the effects of plasma on the P. aeruginosa matrix using atomic force microscopy, AFM [2,8,40]. Vandervoort and Brelles-Mariño [2] studied the topography of plasma-treated P. aeruginosa biofilms and observed that the area corresponding to the matrix was reduced in the case of plasma-treated biofilms compared to control ones and that after 30 min of plasma treatment there were no areas that could putatively be assigned to the matrix. The researchers suggested that plasma could reduce the matrix areas possibly by oxidation or peroxidation of the exopolysaccharides by the reactive oxygen species present in the plasma. The reduction or eventual loss of the matrix would reduce the adhesiveness of the biofilm to the surface to which it is anchored and would lead to the disorganization or disintegration of the biofilm tridimensional structure. It was demonstrated that the adhesiveness of the matrix to the tip of an AFM cantilever varied throughout the biofilm surface and was reduced after plasma treatment. The effect of plasma on the biofilm matrix was also reported by Ziuzina et al. [11,12] using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM). They demonstrated that an extended plasma treatment had a detrimental effect on the viability of P. aeruginosa both by disintegrating bacterial cells and the biofilm matrix.
Our results show a reduction to an almost complete removal of the biofilm matrix after plasma exposure. Taking into account that the biofilm cells undergo morphological and physiological changes upon plasma treatment, it is evident that biofilm eradication is not only due to cell death but also to matrix degradation/disintegration. Reactive species and UV radiation in the plasma might chemically modify and degrade the matrix leaving the cells more vulnerable to the treatment.
The structure of the biofilm matrix is altered after plasma treatment
Fig 4 shows the SEM images of P. aeruginosa biofilms treated with plasma for 0, 3, and 30 min. Control biofilms depict a tridimensional structure where 1 μm long, intact rods are surrounded by matrix and interwoven with matrix fibers. The images corresponding to biofilms treated with plasma for 3 min show some cells of irregular shape but there is no significant damage either to the matrix or to the cell morphology. After a 30-min exposure to plasma, images depict a flat, disorganized biofilm with distorted and broken cells and matrix disintegration. Several authors have used SEM to assess the effect of plasma on P. aeruginosa sessile cells [14,15,51] whereas very few have used it to evaluate the effect on the biofilm matrix. Ziuzina and colleagues [11,12] used SEM to visualize the effect of a DBD plasma source on E. coli and P. aeruginosa biofilms formed on polycarbonate membranes. For P. aeruginosa biofilms and, in agreement with our results, these authors observed intact cells surrounded by matrix and interwoven with matrix fibers in the biofilm control and deformed cells and matrix disintegration after 5 min of plasma treatment.
eDNA protects the biofilm against plasma treatment
Many contributions highlight the importance of eDNA in adhesion to surfaces and biofilm development [39]. Biofilm-forming strains of P. aeruginosa have been shown to produce extracellular eDNA that might function as a cell-to-cell interconnecting compound within the biofilm matrix [39,52]. Allesen-Holm et al. [52] treated P. aeruginosa biofilms of different ages with DNase and found that the enzyme dissolved young biofilms while the established ones were marginally affected by the treatment. These results suggest that young biofilm cells are held together by eDNA whereas there are other compounds that play this role in older biofilms.
In a previous contribution we demonstrated the presence of abundant extracellular DNA (eDNA) on the P. aeruginosa biofilm matrix [18]. To determine whether eDNA helps protecting the biofilm matrix from plasma, eDNA was enzymatically degraded with DNase before plasma treatment. Fig 5 shows the survival curve of a DNase-treated biofilm subjected to plasma for different exposure times. The curve shows double-slope kinetics with a rapid decline in the number of CFU/mL for the first five min followed by a slow decline for longer exposure times. A decrease of 3.4 log units in the number of CFU/mL was obtained after three min of exposure to plasma and biofilms were completely eradicated with a decrease of 6.3 log units (˃99.999% killing efficacy) in the number of CFU/mL after a 15-min plasma treatment.
Two controls were included in this experiment: a non-treated biofilm and a biofilm subjected to DNase but with no plasma treatment. The biofilm subjected to DNase treatment showed a modest decrease in the number of CFU/mL of 13.4% compared to the control with no treatment, probably due to the detachment of cells during the rinses after the enzymatic treatment. This result suggests that although eDNA may not play an instrumental role in the maintenance of the biofilm structure, it functions as a link among the outer biofilm cells.
Plasma decontamination efficiency can be assessed by determining the decimal reduction time (D value), time required to reduce the microorganism concentration by 90%. This parameter has been originally defined for thermal killing of microorganisms by autoclaving. The first portion of the survival curve has a D value (D1) of 0.91 ± 0.07 min for short exposure times. For biofilms not subjected to DNase treatment, we previously reported a similar double-slope inactivation kinetics with a D value (D1) of 1.14 ± 0.28 min [18]. These two D-values were significantly different (p<0.05). These results show that eDNA plays a role in the protection of the biofilm since its removal results in a biofilm that is faster and therefore easier to eradicate with plasma than the biofilm with an eDNA-containing matrix. Abramzon et al [5] suggested that the double-slope kinetics could be explained by the death of the biofilm upper layers of microorganisms, readily available and more exposed to plasma. After this rapid initial inactivation, plasma has to penetrate layers of cell debris and dead cells before reaching the inner portion of the biofilm. Based on our results, it is clear that after eDNA removal, cells are more exposed to plasma and its reactive species can reach easier the inner portion of the biofilm leading to a more effective biofilm eradication.
The chemistry and structure of the biofilm macromolecules are altered after plasma treatment
Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR) provides information on the overall biochemical and structural composition of the material under study. In this work, A/T FT-IR dry film technology was used to evaluate the whole cell and matrix composition of P. aeruginosa biofilms and the chemical and structural modifications macromolecules go through when biofilms are treated with plasma for different exposure times. Fig 6A depicts the three average spectra obtained from three independent experiments corresponding to P. aeruginosa non-treated biofilms (control samples). The second derivative of one of those average spectra at the main spectral windows is shown in Fig 6B–6D. The FT-IR absorption spectra show the overall spectral features and the particular markers previously reported for biofilms produced by P. aeruginosa strains and other Gram-negative biofilms [53–55]. The well-defined spectral windows associated to functional groups in biomolecules are indicated as follows: W1 (3,000–2,800 cm−1), the spectral region assigned to C-H vibrational modes in–CH3 and >CH2 asymmetric and symmetric stretching modes of fatty acids and lipids. W2 (1,780–1,480 cm−1), mainly indicative of biomass content, includes amide I (1,780–1,600 cm−1) and amide II (1,600–1,480 cm−1) regions. Amide I contains the >C = O stretching vibrations in amide bonds of proteins, in esters mainly from phospholipids, carboxylic acids, and lipid oxides; and the >C-OO• functional group in lipid peroxides. This region is also sensitive to changes in protein secondary structure. Amide II region is assigned to C-N stretching and N-H bending in protein and peptides. W3 (1,500–1,200 cm−1) the so-called “mixed region”, contains the spectral bands at 1,450, 1,402, and 1,240 cm−1 most probably resulting from a weak band due to C–H bending vibrations of CH2, >C–O bending from carboxylic acids, and >P = O symmetric stretching corresponding to fatty acid, proteins, and phosphorus-containing carbohydrates, respectively. Finally, W4 (1,200–900 cm−1) the “carbohydrates window” contains the spectral bands of cell carbohydrates and other matrix components [45,56] (Table 2).
Table 2. Spectral windows associated to functional groups in biomolecules and band assignment.
Windows, spectral regions | Wavenumber (cm-1) |
Band assignation1 | References | |
---|---|---|---|---|
WA 3,300–3,100 |
3,298 3,283 |
N-H and O-H str. vibrations in polysaccharides and proteins | [45,46,59] | |
W1 Lipids 3,000–2,800 |
2,960 | C-H asym. str. of -CH3 in fatty acid chains | [45,46] |
|
2,923 | C-H asym. str. of >CH2 in fatty acid chains | |||
2,875 | C-H sym. str. of -CH3 in fatty acids | |||
2,852 | C-H sym. str. of >CH2 in fatty acids | [45,46,59–62] | ||
W2 Amide I and II 1,780–1,480 |
1,740–1,745 |
>C = O str. in carboxylate ions, esters in lipids, fatty acids peroxides | [45,46,55,63,64] | |
1,720–1,715 | >C = O str. in COOH group of fatty acids, lipid oxides | |||
Amide I 1,650 |
>C = O str. and C–N bending in amide groups of proteins and peptides. Sensitive to protein conformation |
1,695–1,675 β-antiparallel |
[49,59,65–67] |
|
1,670–1,666 β-turns | ||||
1,660–1,650 α-helix | ||||
1,635–1,625 β-sheets | ||||
Amide II 1,540 |
N–H bending, C–N str. of proteins and peptides |
|||
W3 Mixed region 1500–1200 |
1,450 | C-H bend in CH2 and CH3 | [45,46] | |
1,402 | >C = O sym. str. for deprotonated COO- group and C-O bending from COO- | [45, 55, 60–62] | ||
1,240 | P = O asym. str. of PO2¯ in phosphodiesters of DNA/RNA | [46, 54, 58, 62] | ||
W4 Carbohydrates1200-900 |
1,175 1,117 1,084 1,043 |
C–OH str., C–O–C and C–O ring vibrations in polysaccharides and C-P-O str. | [45, 54–56,62,68] | |
Fingerprinting 900–700 |
860 | α- glycosidic linkages | [69] | |
800 | β- glycosidic linkages | [55,69] | ||
720 | C-H rocking of CH2 | [45] |
1 asym: asymmetric; sym: symmetric; str: stretching; ben: bending.
The four typical bands due to C–OH stretching modes, C–O–C, and C–O ring vibrations in polysaccharides were detected (Table 2). It is important to note that under our experimental conditions, the reported bands due to alginate within the biofilm matrix such as the shoulder on the amide I band at 1,615 cm−1 (asymmetric stretching of the carboxylate ion), the peaks at 1,250 cm−1 (C-O-C of the esters in alginate), and 1,060 cm−1 (C-OH stretching of alcohols) were not observed [54]. These results are in agreement with those of Wozniak et al. [57] who reported that alginate is not a significant component of the extracellular matrix of P. aeruginosa PAO1 biofilms. Besides, bands present at W1 and W4 might be indicating that, under our experimental conditions, the biofilm matrix contains mainly Psl composed of D-mannose, D-glucose, and the desoxyhexoses l-rhamnose [37]. DNA absorption bands were also detected at 1,084 cm−1, assigned to the vibration of C-O-C and C-O-P in polysaccharides but also to PO2¯ groups in nucleic acids; and at 1,240 cm−1, mostly from the vibration intensities of the phosphodiester PO2¯ groups in the DNA/RNA backbone structure [54,58].
As a first approach, we analyzed the effects of plasma on P. aeruginosa biofilms comparing the features of the second derivatives of spectra obtained after different plasma exposure times in the whole IR range. This first FT-IR analysis confirmed that cells and matrix macromolecules and structures were modified, being the impact of this effect more evident after 30 min of plasma treatment. A hierarchical cluster analysis using second derivatives as input data showed that those changes occurred in sessile biomass (W2 and W3), cell membranes (mainly covered by W1), matrix-included carbohydrates, and DNA (W1 to W4). It is evident that profound changes took place when plasma treatment was extended from 3 to 30 min (Fig 7).
In order to carry out a more in depth analysis of the effect of plasma on sessile cells, we studied the spectral features of amide I band (~1,650 cm−1), which gives information of protein conformation; and amide II band (~1,540 cm−1) which, together with amide I are considered biomass markers [45,70]. Through amide I band it is possible to evaluate protein and biomass alterations by changes in the contribution of α-helix, parallel and anti-parallel β-sheet, β-turns, and unordered conformations (Table 2). Although there are some difficulties and limitations in discriminating the contribution of each conformation within the overall secondary structure of proteins, the use of the second-derivative technique allows overcoming some of these limitations [66,71]. When the vector-normalized second derivative of the average spectra for the three conditions studied (plasma treatment for 0, 3, and 30 min) were compared, significant differences among contributions of the peaks under amide I and amide II bands were found (Fig 8). The conformational distribution of proteins in P. aeruginosa biofilms seems to be mainly a combination of α-helices and β-sheets conformation observed at approximately 1,655 and 1,630 cm−1, respectively. Interestingly, as plasma treatment increased from 3 to 30 min, a decrease in the intensity of the peak assigned to β–sheet conformation together with an increase in the intensity of the bands assigned to β-turns and antiparallel β-sheets were observed (Fig 8A, Table 2). In antiparallel β-sheet structures, the chain packing has a lower total energy and peptide dipoles alignments are more favorable than in parallel β-sheets [72]. Therefore, the β-parallel sheet motifs in the biofilm proteins seem to change under plasma treatment to joints of β-turns and β-antiparallel sheet producing the typical super-secondary stable pattern which is regularly repeated [73]. In addition to protein structure modifications, plasma effect on sessile biomass could also be observed through amide II changes. The dendrogram built with the vector-normalized second derivative spectra in the amide I and II regions (Fig 8B) provides evidence that the biofilm exposure to plasma produces significant modifications in the biomass content and denaturation or aggregation of proteins mostly after 30 min of treatment.
Nevertheless, one of the key factors most probably contributing to biomass damage in the biofilm is the injury produced on lipid cell membranes by plasma reactive species. Lipids are particularly susceptible to free radical activity leading to oxidative degradation or peroxidation. HOO•, and O2•- radicals, singlet oxygen, and O3 can initiate peroxidation of unsaturated fatty acids and launch a peroxidation chain reaction. The lipid peroxidation chain reaction begins after hydrogen removal from an unsaturated fatty acid to form a lipid radical that reacts with molecular oxygen to form a lipid peroxy radical (ROO'). This radical will attack another unsaturated fatty acid to form a fatty acid hydroperoxide (ROOH) perpetuating the initial reaction. These primary oxidation products are further broken down into secondary products with shorter hydrocarbon chains. The peroxidation of lipids thus generates products which are shorter than the initial fatty acid [74]. The chemical products of lipid peroxidation are therefore, lipid peroxides (LOOH) and lipid oxidation products (LOPs). The latter are non-radical products, mostly aldehydes and ketones such as L = O lipid oxides (LO) and hydroxides (LOH) [63,74,75].
FT-IR spectroscopy allows the monitoring of bands whose changes indicate the formation of primary and secondary oxidation products [63,64,75–77]. At 1,740–45 cm−1, there is a very important band associated with stretching vibrations of the carbonyl group >C = O, particularly in ester bonds between fatty acids and glycerol within the lipid molecule. This band is also associated with the formation of primary oxidation products of fatty acid chains in lipid peroxidation (LOO• and LOOH) (Table 2). On the other hand, the absorbance of the aldehyde functional group in LOPs overlaps with the one corresponding to >C = O in carboxylates or acids at 1,750 cm-1 in the amide I band [63,64,76]. Therefore, the evaluation of the >C = O stretching band intensity at 1,743 cm−1 and 1,715 cm-1 in vector-normalized spectra corresponding to biofilms exposed to plasma for 0, 3, and 30 min, can be used as cell membrane lipid peroxidation markers. Our results did not show the expected increase of the band intensity at 1,745 cm-1 due to primary oxidation products (Table 3). However, the increase of the final oxidation products directly depends on the generation of the primary oxidation products [77]. In our case, we assume that while the >C = O stretching band intensity at 1,743 cm-1 might increase due to the accumulation of LOO• products, a significant decrease occurred due to cleavage of the ester link probably as a result of matrix degradation/disintegration. Nevertheless, after 30 min of plasma exposure, the concentration of radical species LOO• and L• is high enough for the species to collide generating stable species and the secondary oxidation products detected at 1,715 cm-1 (Table 3) [76,77]. Based on the thorough analysis of the modification of >C = O band features described above, we can conclude that there is a clear significant damage to cell proteins and peroxidation of cell membrane lipids as plasma exposure time increases.
Table 3. Semi-quantitative analysis of primary lipid oxidation products and final oxidation products.
Plasma exposure time (min) | Primary lipid oxidation products and >C = O in ester bonds | Final oxidation products and >C = O in carboxyl acids |
---|---|---|
0 | 1.27 ± 0.06 a | 0.67 ± 0.02 c |
3 | 1.16 ± 0.04 a | 0.64 ± 0.06 c |
30 | 0.79 ± 0. 05 b | 0.76 ± 0.01 d |
Primary and secondary lipid oxidation products were measured by spectral band areas at 1,740–45 cm-1 and 1,715–20 cm-1, respectively. Spectral band area values were obtained from the average spectra calculated at each plasma exposure time (0, 3, and 30 min). Results are the average of three independent experiments. Each experiment was performed in duplicates. Different letters indicate significant differences at α = 0.05.
By FT-IR spectroscopy we could also get insight into the effect of plasma exposure on the biofilm matrix. In particular, a chemical and structural disruption in carbohydrates was observed (Fig 9). The plasma-mediated damage to Psl could be monitored by an increase in the absorbance of the rhamnose characteristic functional groups (C-H in CH3 at 2,550 cm-1 in W2 and C-O-C at 1,043–44 cm-1 in W4) and of D-mannose and D-glucose, (C-O-C in W4). A fraction of these moieties, which are hidden in the Psl normal helical structure (Fig 9A) might be probably exposed and therefore enhance their FT-IR absorbance after plasma treatment. A multivariate analysis of the second derivative spectra in W4 (at C-H of CH3 band) effectively reflected the overall structural variations in the polysaccharide structure induced by 3 and 30 min of plasma treatment (Fig 9B). Three groups of spectra, one for each plasma exposure time, were clustered in the dendrogram. The most noticeable effects of plasma on the structure and chemical composition of matrix polysaccharides were observed after 3 min of treatment. The control group was at a spectral distance of D = 18 with respect to groups corresponding to 3 and 30 min of plasma treatment as shown in Fig 9C. Therefore, and in agreement with the microscopy observations, the effect of plasma on the matrix polysaccharides is evident already at short exposure times.
Our results differ from recent results reported by Khan et al. [78] who showed a gradual reduction in carbohydrates, proteins, lipids, and DNA contents when increasing plasma exposure time. However, it is important to remark that Kahn and co-workers rinse the samples after plasma treatment and thus, all the detached material is removed.
Regarding eDNA present in the matrix, it was previously reported that the photodamage of UV-light to DNA is not directly reflected in the intensity of the bands typically assigned to DNA such as 2,950, 1,963, 1,220, and 1,067 cm-1 [45]. Previous investigations showed that a high proportion of intracellular DNA is released from the cytoplasm due to cell membrane damage, preventing DNA-band analysis [78]. In addition, modifications in phosphate bands are also difficult to observe because of the numerous overlaps [79]. Nonetheless, it was possible to observe a noticeable general damage to DNA after 30 min of plasma exposure through changes in the features of the second derivative spectra in the 1,500–1,300 cm-1 region (W3) (Fig 10). These changes were particularly significant at 1,464, 1,396, 1,302 cm-1 peaks, which were previously assigned to photodamage to thymidine oligonucleotides [80].
In summary, through FT-IR we demonstrated that plasma treatment induces chemical and structural changes in both the biofilm matrix and the biomass. Those changes are more profound with longer plasma exposure times and affect biomass, lipids, carbohydrates, proteins, and eDNA.
A model for plasma-mediated biofilm eradication
Plasma-mediated biofilm eradication has been investigated for more than a decade. Many of those studies were aimed at finding appropriate plasma sources and the best operation conditions to eradicate biofilms. Several mechanisms were hypothesized and a considerable amount of evidence showed morphological and physiological changes in the biofilm cells upon plasma treatment.
Biofilms cells are embedded in a protective matrix composed of extracellular polymeric substances. If plasma presumably damaged the cells, there should be an effect on the biofilm matrix as well. However, this effect has received less attention compared to the damage to cells. Although many contributions have highlighted the putative mechanism/s that might explain the interaction of the plasma reactive agents with the biofilm matrix, there is little evidence regarding the changes the matrix undergoes.
In this work, we have carried out a comprehensive study of the biofilm matrix and the structural and chemical changes the matrix and sessile cells go through upon plasma treatment. To our knowledge this is the first report providing detailed evidence of the variety of chemical and structural changes that occur mostly on the biofilm matrix but also on sessile cells as a consequence of the plasma treatment. In summary, we demonstrated that the amount of biofilm matrix is reduced and its structure is altered upon plasma treatment. We showed that eDNA plays a role in biofilm protection against plasma since the enzymatic degradation of the DNA results in a better and faster biofilm eradication. We also demonstrated for the first time, chemical and structural disruption in biofilm matrix carbohydrates with an increase in rhamnose, D-mannose, and D- glucose typically hidden in the Psl normal helical structure and seemingly exposed after plasma treatment. We showed DNA photodamage and a clear damage to sessile biomass due to significant changes in the protein secondary structure.
In addition, in a previous contribution we characterized our plasma source by optical emission spectroscopy and detected the presence of excited N2 bands and N2+ ions and the formation of O3, H2O2 and NO3- in the plasma afterglow [41]. We then hypothesized that these reactive species might trigger lipid peroxidation and a chain reaction leading to the generation of lipid radicals. The oxidation of the matrix components might lead to the degradation and loss of the matrix structure allowing RONS to reach the cells. In this paper, we determined the presence of lipid oxidation products through FT-IR, thus confirming cell membrane lipid peroxidation as plasma exposure time increases.
Taking these results together, we propose a mechanism by which the reactive species and UV radiation in the plasma alters eDNA, carbohydrates, and other components of the biofilm matrix resulting in a less structured protective case and leading to more vulnerable cells. Our results are consistent with a matrix reduction due to the combined effect of UV radiation, RONS, and plasma ions. All these reactive agents might damage the eDNA-Psl fibers at short plasma exposure times and oxidize the rest of the matrix macromolecules. Considering the substantial contribution of the UV radiation to the biofilm eradication process and the lower penetration efficiency of this type of radiation, we propose that UV affects not only the upper layers of the biofilm matrix but also its protective eDNA, destabilizing or degrading the eDNA-Psl matrix network and opening an avenue for RONS and ions further action. RONS also contribute to DNA damage in synergism with UV. Afterwards, plasma may act directly on the sessile cells producing lysis due to the combination of oxidative stress, electrostatic changes, and electroporation. Sessile cells undergo sequential morphological and physiological changes, losing their cultivability although not their virulence to finally succumb to the treatment [18].
These results show the potential of the air-operated DBD plasma source and provide detailed evidence on the putative mechanism of plasma-mediated biofilm eradication.
Supporting information
Acknowledgments
The authors acknowledge Dr. Diana Grondona and Dr. Leandro Giuliani (INFIP, UBA-CONICET) for providing the plasma device, Dr. Germán Islan (CINDEFI-CCT-CONICET) for his help with SEM experiments, and Dr. Evelina Ferrer (CEQUINOR-CONICET) for her contribution in A/T FT-IR spectral acquisition and useful discussions and comments. JSA is indebted to CONICET for a doctoral fellowship. CF is a postdoctoral fellow of CONICET and AB is member of CIC PBA.
Data Availability
All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.
Funding Statement
Universidad Nacional de La Plata, Argentina provided support for this study in the form of grants to GBM and AB (Grants #X764 and #X775 respectively). The National Scientific and Technical Research Council (CONICET) provided support for this study in the form of a doctoral fellowship to JSA and a post doctoral fellowship to CF. Fundación FUNPRECIT, a non profit organization that promotes research and development, innovation and competitiveness and cooperation for economic and social development, provided support for publication of this study in the form of a payment for technological services to AB. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
References
- 1.Kolter R, Losick R. One for all and all for one. Science. 1998;280: 226–227. 10.1126/science.280.5361.226 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Vandervoort KG, Brelles-Mariño G. Plasma-mediated inactivation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms grown on borosilicate surfaces under continuous culture system. PLoS ONE. 2014;9: e108512 10.1371/journal.pone.0108512 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Costerton JW, Stewart PS, Greenberg EP. Bacterial biofilms: a common cause of persistent infections. Science. 1999;284: 1318–1322. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Brelles-Mariño G. Challenges in biofilm inactivation: the use of cold plasma as a new approach. J Bioprocess Biotech. 2012;2: 1–4. 10.4172/2155-9821.1000e107 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Abramzon N, Joaquin JC, Bray J, Brelles-Marino G. Biofilm destruction by RF high-pressure cold plasma jet. IEEE Trans Plasma Sci. 2006;34: 1304–1309. 10.1109/TPS.2006.877515 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Vandervoort KG, Abramzon N, Brelles-Marino G. Plasma interactions with bacterial biofilms as visualized through atomic force microscopy. IEEE Trans Plasma Sci. 2008;36: 1296–1297. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Joaquin JC, Kwan C, Abramzon N, Vandervoort K, Brelles-Mariño G. Is gas-discharge plasma a new solution to the old problem of biofilm inactivation? Microbiol Read Engl. 2009;155: 724–732. 10.1099/mic.0.021501-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Zelaya AJ, Stough G, Rad N, Vandervoort K, Brelles-Marino G. Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm inactivation: decreased cell culturability, adhesiveness to surfaces, and biofilm thickness upon high-pressure nonthermal plasma treatment. IEEE Trans Plasma Sci IEEE Nucl Plasma Sci Soc. 2010;38: 3398–3403. 10.1109/TPS.2010.2082570 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Marchal F, Robert H, Merbahi N, Fontagné-Faucher C, Yousfi M, Romain CE, et al. Inactivation of gram-positive biofilms by low-temperature plasma jet at atmospheric pressure. J Phys Appl Phys. 2012;45: 345202 10.1088/0022-3727/45/34/345202 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Pei X, Lu X, Liu J, Liu D, Yang Y, Ostrikov K, et al. Inactivation of a 25.5 μm Enterococcus faecalis biofilm by a room-temperature, battery-operated, handheld air plasma jet. J Phys Appl Phys. 2012;45: 165205 10.1088/0022-3727/45/16/165205 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Ziuzina D, Patil S, Cullen PJ, Boehm D, Bourke P. Dielectric barrier discharge atmospheric cold plasma for inactivation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms. Plasma Med. 2014;4 10.1615/PlasmaMed.2014011996 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Ziuzina D, Boehm D, Patil S, Cullen PJ, Bourke P. Cold plasma inactivation of bacterial biofilms and reduction of quorum sensing regulated virulence factors. PLoS ONE. 2015;10: e0138209 10.1371/journal.pone.0138209 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Mai-Prochnow A, Bradbury M, Ostrikov K, Murphy AB. Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm response and resistance to cold atmospheric pressure plasma is linked to the redox-active molecule phenazine. PLoS ONE. 2015;10: e0130373 10.1371/journal.pone.0130373 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Ben Belgacem Z, Carré G, Boudifa M, Charpentier E, Cawe B, Gellé MP. Effectiveness of non-thermal O2–N2 plasma on P. aeruginosa multilayer biofilms cultured on hydroxyapatite. IRBM. 2016;37: 68–74. 10.1016/j.irbm.2016.02.006 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Gabriel AA, Ugay MCCF, Siringan MAT, Rosario LMD, Tumlos RB, Ramos HJ. Atmospheric pressure plasma jet inactivation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms on stainless steel surfaces. Innov Food Sci Emerg Technol. 2016;36: 311–319. 10.1016/j.ifset.2016.07.015 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Modic M, McLeod NP, Sutton JM, Walsh JL. Cold atmospheric pressure plasma elimination of clinically important single- and mixed-species biofilms. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2017;49: 375–378. 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2016.11.022 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Puligundla P, Mok C. Potential applications of nonthermal plasmas against biofilm-associated micro-organisms in vitro. J Appl Microbiol. 2017. 10.1111/jam.13404 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Soler-Arango J, Xaubet M, Giuliani L, Grondona D, Brelles-Mariño G. Air-based coaxial dielectric barrier discharge plasma source for Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm eradication. Plasma Med. 2017;7 10.1615/PlasmaMed.2017019506 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Branda SS, Vik Å, Friedman L, Kolter R. Biofilms: the matrix revisited. Trends Microbiol. 2005;13: 20–26. 10.1016/j.tim.2004.11.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Sutherland IW. Biofilm exopolysaccharides: a strong and sticky framework. Microbiology. 2001;147: 3–9. 10.1099/00221287-147-1-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Sutherland IW. The biofilm matrix–an immobilized but dynamic microbial environment. Trends Microbiol. 2001;9: 222–227. 10.1016/S0966-842X(01)02012-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Flemming HC, Wingender J. The biofilm matrix. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2010;8: 623–633. 10.1038/nrmicro2415 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Bendouah Z, Barbeau J, Hamad WA, Desrosiers M. Biofilm formation by Staphylococcus Aureus and Pseudomonas Aeruginosa is associated with an unfavorable evolution after surgery for chronic sinusitis and nasal polyposis. Otolaryngol Neck Surg. 2006;134: 991–996. 10.1016/j.otohns.2006.03.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Tümmler B, Kiewitz C. Cystic fibrosis: an inherited susceptibility to bacterial respiratory infections. Mol Med Today. 1999;5: 351–358. 10.1016/S1357-4310(99)01506-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Balazs DJ, Triandafillu K, Wood P, Chevolot Y, van Delden C, Harms H, et al. Inhibition of bacterial adhesion on PVC endotracheal tubes by RF-oxygen glow discharge, sodium hydroxide and silver nitrate treatments. Biomaterials. 2004;25: 2139–2151. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.08.053 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Bryers JD, Ratner BD. Bioinspired implant materials befuddle bacteria. ASM News. 2004;70: 232–237. [Google Scholar]
- 27.Gillis RJ, Iglewski BH. Azithromycin Retards Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm formation. J Clin Microbiol. 2004;42: 5842–5845. 10.1128/JCM.42.12.5842-5845.2004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Tanaka G, Shigeta M, Komatsuzawa H, Sugai M, Suginaka H, Usui T. Effect of clarithromycin on Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms. Chemotherapy. 2000;46: 36–42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Banin E, Vasil ML, Greenberg EP. Iron and Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm formation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102: 11076–11081. 10.1073/pnas.0504266102 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Hentzer M, Riedel K, Rasmussen TB, Heydorn A, Andersen JB, Parsek MR, et al. Inhibition of quorum sensing in Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm bacteria by a halogenated furanone compound. Microbiology. 2002;148: 87–102. 10.1099/00221287-148-1-87 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Davies DG, Parsek MR, Pearson JP, Iglewski BH, Costerton JW, Greenberg EP. The involvement of cell-to-cell signals in the development of a bacterial biofilm. Science. 1998;280: 295–298. 10.1126/science.280.5361.295 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Pires D, Sillankorva S, Faustino A, Azeredo J. Use of newly isolated phages for control of Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1 and ATCC 10145 biofilms. Res Microbiol. 2011;162: 798–806. 10.1016/j.resmic.2011.06.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Fong SA, Drilling A, Morales S, Cornet ME, Woodworth BA, Fokkens WJ, et al. Activity of bacteriophages in removing biofilms of Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from chronic rhinosinusitis patients. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2017;7 10.3389/fcimb.2017.00418 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Chan BK, Turner PE, Kim S, Mojibian HR, Elefteriades JA, Narayan D. Phage treatment of an aortic graft infected with Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Evol Med Public Health. 2018;2018: 60–66. 10.1093/emph/eoy005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Evans LR, Linker A. Production and characterization of the slime polysaccharide of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J Bacteriol. 1973;116: 915–924. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Friedman L, Kolter R. Genes involved in matrix formation in Pseudomonas aeruginosa PA14 biofilms. Mol Microbiol. 2004;51: 675–690. 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2003.03877.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Byrd MS, Sadovskaya I, Vinogradov E, Lu H, Sprinkle AB, Richardson SH, et al. Genetic and biochemical analyses of the Pseudomonas aeruginosa Psl exopolysaccharide reveal overlapping roles for polysaccharide synthesis enzymes in Psl and LPS production. Mol Microbiol. 2009;73: 622–638. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2009.06795.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Colvin KM, Gordon VD, Murakami K, Borlee BR, Wozniak DJ, Wong GCL, et al. The Pel polysaccharide can serve a structural and protective role in the biofilm matrix of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. PLOS Pathog. 2011;7: e1001264 10.1371/journal.ppat.1001264 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Whitchurch CB, Tolker-Nielsen T, Ragas PC, Mattick JS. Extracellular DNA required for bacterial biofilm formation. Science. 2002;295: 1487–1487. 10.1126/science.295.5559.1487 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Zelaya A, Vandervoort K, Brelles-Mariño G. Battling bacterial biofilms with gas discharge plasma In: Machala Z, Hensel K, Akishev Y, editors. Plasma for bio-decontamination, medicine and food security. Springer; Netherlands; 2012. pp. 135–148. 10.1007/978-94-007-2852-3_11 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Soler-Arango J, Brelles-Mariño G, Rodero A, Garcia MC. Characterization of an air-based coaxial dielectric barrier discharge plasma source for biofilm eradication. Plasma Chem Plasma Process. 2018;38: 535–556. 10.1007/s11090-018-9877-3 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Ziuzina D, Patil S, Cullen PJ, Keener KM, Bourke P. Atmospheric cold plasma inactivation of Escherichia coli in liquid media inside a sealed package. J Appl Microbiol. 2013;114: 778–787. 10.1111/jam.12087 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Clark DJ, Maaløe O. DNA replication and the division cycle in Escherichia coli. J Mol Biol. 1967;23: 99–112. 10.1016/S0022-2836(67)80070-6 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Schneider CA, Rasband WS, Eliceiri KW. NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat Methods. 2012;9: 671–675. 10.1038/nmeth.2089 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Naumann D. Infrared spectroscopy in microbiology In: Wiley J, Chichester SL, editors. Encyclopedia of Analytical Chemistry: applications, theory, and instrumentation. R.A. Meyers; 2000. pp. 1–29 [Google Scholar]
- 46.Bosch A, Serra D, Prieto C, Schmitt J, Naumann D, Yantorno O. Characterization of Bordetella pertussis growing as biofilm by chemical analysis and FT-IR spectroscopy. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2006;71: 736–747. 10.1007/s00253-005-0202-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Helm D, Naumann D. Identification of some bacterial cell components by FT-IR spectroscopy. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1995;126: 75–79. 10.1111/j.1574-6968.1995.tb07393.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Bosch A, Miñán A, Vescina C, Degrossi J, Gatti B, Montanaro P, et al. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy for rapid identification of nonfermenting gram-negative bacteria isolated from sputum samples from cystic fibrosis patients. J Clin Microbiol. 2008;46: 2535–2546. 10.1128/JCM.02267-07 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Fabian H, Mäntele W. Infrared Spectroscopy of Proteins. Handbook of Vibrational Spectroscopy. 2006. 10.1002/0470027320.s8201 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Wood PJ. Specificity in the interaction of direct dyes with polysaccharides. Carbohydr Res. 1980;85: 271–287. 10.1016/S0008-6215(00)84676-5 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Laroussi M. Low-temperature plasma jet for biomedical applications: a review. IEEE Trans Plasma Sci. 2015;43: 703–712. 10.1109/TPS.2015.2403307 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Allesen-Holm M, Barken KB, Yang L, Klausen M, Webb JS, Kjelleberg S, et al. A characterization of DNA release in Pseudomonas aeruginosa cultures and biofilms. Mol Microbiol. 2006;59: 1114–1128. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2005.05008.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Naumann D, Helm D, Labischinski H. Microbiological characterizations by FT-IR spectroscopy. Nature. 1991;351: 81–82. 10.1038/351081a0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Nivens DE, Ohman DE, Williams J, Franklin MJ. Role of alginate and its O acetylation in formation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa microcolonies and biofilms. J Bacteriol. 2001;183: 1047–1057. 10.1128/JB.183.3.1047-1057.2001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Serra D, Bosch A, Russo DM, Rodríguez ME, Zorreguieta Á, Schmitt J, et al. Continuous nondestructive monitoring of Bordetella pertussis biofilms by fourier transform infrared spectroscopy and other corroborative techniques. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2007;387: 1759–1767. 10.1007/s00216-006-1079-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Helm D, Labischinski H, Schallehn G, Naumann D. Classification and identification of bacteria by fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy. Microbiology. 1991;137: 69–79. 10.1099/00221287-137-1-69 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Wozniak DJ, Wyckoff TJO, Starkey M, Keyser R, Azadi P, O’toole GA, et al. Alginate is not a significant component of the extracellular polysaccharide matrix of PA14 and PA01 Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100: 7907–7912. 10.1073/pnas.1231792100 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Holman H-YN, Miles R, Hao Z, Wozei E, Anderson LM, Yang H. Real-time chemical imaging of bacterial activity in biofilms using open-channel microfluidics and synchrotron FTIR spectromicroscopy. Anal Chem. 2009;81: 8564–8570. 10.1021/ac9015424 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Tang M, McEwen GD, Wu Y, Miller CD, Zhou A. Characterization and analysis of mycobacteria and Gram-negative bacteria and co-culture mixtures by Raman microspectroscopy, FTIR, and atomic force microscopy. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2013;405: 1577–1591. 10.1007/s00216-012-6556-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Ojeda JJ, Romero-González ME, Bachmann RT, Edyvean RGJ, Banwart SA. Characterization of the cell surface and cell wall chemistry of drinking water bacteria by combining XPS, FTIR spectroscopy, modeling, and potentiometric titrations. Langmuir. 2008;24: 4032–4040. 10.1021/la702284b [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Lu X, Al-Qadiri HM, Lin M, Rasco BA. Application of mid-infrared and Raman spectroscopy to the study of bacteria. Food Bioprocess Technol. 2011;4: 919–935. 10.1007/s11947-011-0516-8 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Schmitt J, Udelhoven T, Naumann D, Flemming HC. Stacked spectral data processing and artificial neural networks applied to FT-IR and FT-Raman spectra in biomedical applications. Infrared Spectroscopy: New Tool in Medicine. International Society for Optics and Photonics; 1998. pp. 236–245. 10.1117/12.306103 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Oleszko A, Olsztyńska-Janus S, Walski T, Grzeszczuk-Kuć K, Bujok J, Gałecka K, et al. Application of FTIR-ATR spectroscopy to determine the extent of lipid peroxidation in plasma during haemodialysis. BioMed Research International. 2015. 10.1155/2015/245607 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Liang P, Chen C, Zhao S, Ge F, Liu D, Liu B, et al. Application of Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy for the oxidation and peroxide value evaluation in virgin walnut oil. Journal of Spectroscopy. 2013. 10.1155/2013/138728 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Ferrer EG, Bosch A, Yantorno O, Baran EJ. A spectroscopy approach for the study of the interactions of bioactive vanadium species with bovine serum albumin. Bioorg Med Chem. 2008;16: 3878–3886. 10.1016/j.bmc.2008.01.060 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Byler DM, Susi H. Examination of the secondary structure of proteins by deconvolved FTIR spectra. Biopolymers. 1986;25: 469–487. 10.1002/bip.360250307 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Gilmanshin R, Williams S, Callender RH, Woodruff WH, Dyer RB. Fast events in protein folding: relaxation dynamics of secondary and tertiary structure in native apomyoglobin. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 1997;94: 3709–3713. 10.1073/pnas.94.8.3709 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Nichols PD, Michael Henson J, Guckert JB, Nivens DE, White DC. Fourier transform-infrared spectroscopic methods for microbial ecology: analysis of bacteria, bacteri-polymer mixtures and biofilms. J Microbiol Methods. 1985;4: 79–94. 10.1016/0167-7012(85)90023-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Synytsya A, Čopíková J, Matějka P, Machovič V. Fourier transform Raman and infrared spectroscopy of pectins. Carbohydr Polym. 2003;54: 97–106. 10.1016/S0144-8617(03)00158-9 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Haris PI, Severcan F. FTIR spectroscopic characterization of protein structure in aqueous and non-aqueous media. J Mol Catal B Enzym. 1999;7: 207–221. 10.1016/S1381-1177(99)00030-2 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Miller LM, Bourassa MW, Smith RJ. FTIR spectroscopic imaging of protein aggregation in living cells. Biochim Biophys Acta BBA—Biomembr. 2013;1828: 2339–2346. 10.1016/j.bbamem.2013.01.014 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Chou K-C, Pottle M, Némethy G, Ueda yuzo, Scheraga HA. Structure of β-sheets: origin of the right-handed twist and of the increased stability of antiparallel over parallel sheets. J Mol Biol. 1982;162: 89–112. 10.1016/0022-2836(82)90163-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Santos J. Proteínas: estructuras fascinantes. In: Krschenbaum JM, editors. Proteínas: estructuras fascinantes. Las ciencias naturales y la matemática; 2009. pp. 192.
- 74.Farr SB, Kogoma T. Oxidative stress responses in Escherichia coli and Salmonella typhimurium. Microbiol Rev. 1991;55: 561–585. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Oleszko A, Olsztyńska-Janus S, Walski T, Grzeszczuk-Kuć K, Bujok J, Gałecka K, et al. Application of FTIR-ATR spectroscopy to determine the extent of lipid peroxidation in plasma during haemodialysis. BioMed research international. 2015. 10.1155/2015/245607 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Guillén MD, Goicoechea E. Detection of primary and secondary oxidation products by fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) and 1H nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) in sunflower oil during storage. J Agric Food Chem. 2007;55: 10729–10736. 10.1021/jf071712c [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Muik B, Lendl B, Molina-Diaz A, Valcarcel M, Ayora-Cañada MJ. Two-dimensional correlation spectroscopy and multivariate curve resolution for the study of lipid oxidation in edible oils monitored by FTIR and FT-Raman spectroscopy. Anal Chim Acta. 2007;593: 54–67. 10.1016/j.aca.2007.04.050 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Khan MSI, Lee E-J, Kim Y-J. A submerged dielectric barrier discharge plasma inactivation mechanism of biofilms produced by Escherichia coli O157:H7, Cronobacter sakazakii, and Staphylococcus aureus. Sci Rep. 2016;6: 37072 10.1038/srep37072 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Quilès F, Saadi S, Francius G, Bacharouche J, Humbert F. In situ and real time investigation of the evolution of a Pseudomonas fluorescens nascent biofilm in the presence of an antimicrobial peptide. Biochim Biophys Acta BBA—Biomembr. 2016;1858: 75–84. 10.1016/j.bbamem.2015.10.015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Schleicher E, Heßling B, Illarionova V, Bacher A, Weber S, Richter G, et al. Light-induced reactions of Escherichia coli DNA photolyase monitored by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. FEBS J. 2005;272: 1855–1866. 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2005.04617.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.