Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Addict. 2019 Jun 4;28(4):235–237. doi: 10.1111/ajad.12906

A novel therapeutic for opioid use disorder targeting the cholinergic system

Scott J Moeller 1,*, Anissa Abi-Dargham 1
PMCID: PMC6591069  NIHMSID: NIHMS1032600  PMID: 31165540

Commentary

The United States is currently in the grips of an opioid epidemic, which according to recent data from the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) claimed 47,000 American lives in 2017. The addictive behavior at the heart of the epidemic is fueled by the compulsive pursuit of drug reinforcement and preoccupation with the cues that predict it1. Although opioid maintenance medications, such as methadone, buprenorphine, and naltrexone, have been shown to reduce opioid overdoses, these medications are plagued by low rates of retention, as well as by adverse cognitive, physical, and emotional side effects2. The limitations of opioid maintenance medications, in conjunction with the urgency of the opioid epidemic, highlight the immediate and unmet need for coadjuvant treatment strategies, which not only can reduce or eliminate opioid use but also can treat the drug-related attentional biases and other quality-of-life disturbances that accompany the addiction. Against this backdrop, the cholinergic system was recently posited as an exciting new therapeutic target for treating individuals with opioid use disorder (OUD)2.

In this issue of The American Journal on Addictions, Carroll et al.3 provide seminal clinical evidence supporting this suggestion, by showing that a cholinergic medication, galantamine, may have efficacy in improving opioid-related outcomes in OUD. Galantamine is a cognitive enhancer principally used in the treatment of mild to moderate Alzheimer’s disease and similar neuropsychiatric disorders characterized by cognitive decline. Its mechanism of action is to increase synaptic acetylcholine (ACh) levels, primarily by inhibiting activity of acetylcholinesterase, which is the enzyme that catalyzes the breakdown of ACh. However, unlike more selective cholinesterase inhibitors such as donepezil, galantamine is thought to have a dual mechanism of action, additionally acting as a positive allosteric modulator of nicotinic receptors.

In their manuscript, Carroll et al.3 reported the results of a galantamine clinical trial among methadone-maintained individuals who were also cocaine dependent. As part of the trial, participants received, in a double-blind fashion, galantamine or placebo over a 12-week trial that also included a 6-month follow-up, with a highly impressive 97% retention rate. The trial was originally conceived for testing reductions in cocaine use, but in the current study the authors performed a secondary analysis to examine effects of galantamine on opioid use. Results showed that, compared with placebo, galantamine treatment produced fewer opioid-positive urines throughout the study (corroborated with self-reported abstinence), a positive therapeutic effect that extended into the 6-month follow-up period; time to first opioid use was also significantly delayed (i.e., by more than a month) in the galantamine group compared with the placebo group. Importantly, a positive therapeutic effect of galantamine was detected even among participants who had used opioids during the baseline period, prior to randomization, as indicated by a main effect of the galantamine treatment but no interaction with baseline opioid use. This finding is noteworthy because participants who entered treatment urine-positive for opioids submitted more opioid-positive urines throughout the study, consistent with prior reports in stimulant use disorder showing that individuals who enter treatment urine-positive for drugs of abuse generally have poorer outcomes4.

Interestingly, the authors hypothesized that galantamine would reduce opioid use via improvements in attention and memory, which are core cognitive functions of the brain cholinergic system5. Impairments in these cognitive domains have been consistently shown in individuals with OUD6, and are likely to produce downstream effects on goal-directed behavior and psychosocial functioning, which in turn are needed to resist drug-related temptations and sustain the flexibility and motivation for long-term abstinence7; for these reasons, intact cognition is a known predictor of treatment engagement and eventual success in OUD and other addictions8. Thus, the hypothesis of improvement via attentional or memory mechanisms was scientifically sound, and to their credit, the authors examined these processes as potential mediators of the clinical improvement. Contrary to expectations, however, galantamine had no discernible effects on cognition, suggesting that the therapeutic signal cannot be explained by simple cognitive remediation. This null finding does not diminish the importance of the primary trial results, but does indicate that the behavioral mechanism remains to be determined.

One possibility, which the authors briefly mention in their Discussion, is that galantamine’s therapeutic signal may have been driven by restorative effects on reward processing, another important function of the brain cholinergic system, often in interaction with dopamine. The pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus (PPTg), one of several cholinergic midbrain nuclei, projects to the ventral tegmental area (VTA) with the apparent function of performing a gating role, signaling to the VTA whether stimuli encountered in the environment are salient for reward or require motor responses9. In addition, cholinergic interneurons in the striatum contribute to reward processing and the reinforcement of reward-related behaviors10. Accordingly, ACh transmission appears to play a critical role in cue-induced opioid-seeking behavior11, and is closely linked to opioids acquiring heightened motivational properties12. An integration of these perspectives suggests that the brain cholinergic system contributes to the attentional and reward processing functions that subserve approach behavior toward opioid cues and eventual drug use; galantamine, then, could be acting to modulate a cholinergically-mediated attentional bias toward opioid-related cues culminating in reduced drug use. As the authors did not measure drug-related attentional biases, it will be very interesting to evaluate this and related hypotheses in future studies.

More specifically, future studies should include measures of drug-biased attention and drug-biased decision-making as potential mediators of galantamine-induced reductions in drug use. Attentional bias may be measured with behavioral tasks, as well as during functional neuroimaging to characterize the underlying circuitry and the perturbations associated with the bias. Prior studies have suggested that the inclusion of a drug-related context into a standard neuropsychological test may aid in detecting subtle cognitive deficits in addicted individuals13,14. Another interesting direction for future research is to uncover the molecular mechanisms of galantamine’s therapeutic effects in OUD – either alone or in combination with measures of drug-biased attention for a comprehensive, multimodal study of target engagement. Positron emission tomography (PET) radiotracers labeling various cholinergic targets can be employed for this purpose. These could include nicotinic receptor targets (e.g., through the use of well-characterized tracers such 2-FA15), or could include presynaptic targets such as the vesicular cholinergic transporter (e.g., through the use of the new tracer [18F]VAT).

Taken together, Carroll et al.3 appear to have uncovered a novel and potentially impactful therapeutic for OUD, a disease that is devastating the United States. While the behavioral mechanism remains elusive, this report nonetheless suggests numerous exciting directions for future research. Future investigations have the potential to yield valuable information on galantamine as a medication to push forward clinical practice, as well as yield valuable scientific knowledge on the brain cholinergic system and its involvement in OUD and other addictions. If the Carroll et al.3 results are replicated and extended in future trials and clinical laboratory studies, and given that galantamine has shown efficacy in other addictions such as alcohol and cigarette smoking (as the authors review in their manuscript), it is possible that galantamine may emerge as an exciting, next-generation adjunctive medication for improving clinical outcomes in OUD.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Institute on Drug Abuse to SJM (1K01DA037452). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

Footnotes

Disclosure/Conflict of Interest

The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of this paper.

References

  • 1.Goldstein RZ, Volkow ND. Dysfunction of the prefrontal cortex in addiction: neuroimaging findings and clinical implications. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2011;12(11):652–669. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Jensen KP, DeVito EE, Yip S, Carroll KM, Sofuoglu M. The Cholinergic System as a Treatment Target for Opioid Use Disorder. CNS Drugs. 2018;32(11):981–996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Carroll KM, Devito EE, Yip SW, Nich C, Sofuoglu M. Double blind placebo-controlled trial of galantamine for methadone-maintained individuals with cocaine use disorder: Secondary analysis of effects on illicit opioid use. Am J Addict. in press [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Poling J, Kosten TR, Sofuoglu M. Treatment outcome predictors for cocaine dependence. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2007;33(2):191–206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Ballinger EC, Ananth M, Talmage DA, Role LW. Basal Forebrain Cholinergic Circuits and Signaling in Cognition and Cognitive Decline. Neuron. 2016;91(6):1199–1218. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Baldacchino A, Balfour DJ, Passetti F, Humphris G, Matthews K. Neuropsychological consequences of chronic opioid use: a quantitative review and meta-analysis. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2012;36(9):2056–2068. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Blume AW, Davis JM, Schmaling KB. Neurocognitive dysfunction in dually-diagnosed patients: a potential roadblock to motivating behavior change. J Psychoactive Drugs. 1999;31(2):111–115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Dominguez-Salas S, Diaz-Batanero C, Lozano-Rojas OM, Verdejo-Garcia A. Impact of general cognition and executive function deficits on addiction treatment outcomes: Systematic review and discussion of neurocognitive pathways. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2016;71:772–801. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Norton AB, Jo YS, Clark EW, Taylor CA, Mizumori SJ. Independent neural coding of reward and movement by pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus neurons in freely navigating rats. Eur J Neurosci. 2011;33(10):1885–1896. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Gonzales KK, Smith Y. Cholinergic interneurons in the dorsal and ventral striatum: anatomical and functional considerations in normal and diseased conditions. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 2015;1349:1–45. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Liu H, Lai M, Zhou X, et al. Galantamine attenuates the heroin seeking behaviors induced by cues after prolonged withdrawal in rats. Neuropharmacology. 2012;62(8):2515–2521. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Grasing K A threshold model for opposing actions of acetylcholine on reward behavior: Molecular mechanisms and implications for treatment of substance abuse disorders. Behav Brain Res. 2016;312:148–162. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Goldstein RZ, Woicik PA, Lukasik T, Maloney T, Volkow ND. Drug fluency: a potential marker for cocaine use disorders. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2007;89(1):97–101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Moeller SJ, Hajcak G, Parvaz MA, Dunning JP, Volkow ND, Goldstein RZ. Psychophysiological prediction of choice: relevance to insight and drug addiction. Brain. 2012;135(Pt 11):3481–3494. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Brody AL, Mukhin AG, Mamoun MS, et al. Brain nicotinic acetylcholine receptor availability and response to smoking cessation treatment: a randomized trial. JAMA Psychiatry. 2014;71(7):797–805. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES