Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2019 Jun 24;9:9155. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-45738-3

Phenotypic and molecular cytogenetic variability in calendula (Calendula officinalis L.) cultivars and mutant lines obtained via chemical mutagenesis

Tatiana E Samatadze 1,#, Svyatoslav A Zoshchuk 1,#, Firdaus M Hazieva 2, Olga Yu Yurkevich 1, Natalya Yu Svistunova 2, Alexander I Morozov 2, Alexandra V Amosova 1,✉, Olga V Muravenko 1
PMCID: PMC6591508  PMID: 31235779

Abstract

The morphological, meiotic and chromosomal variability were studied in two cultivars of Calendula officinalis L. and their mutant lines obtained though chemical mutagenesis using diethyl sulphate (DES) (0.04%, 0.08%) and dimethyl sulphate (DMS) (0.025%, 0.05%). The studied cultivars displayed different sensitivity to DMS and DES mutagens. More M1 plants with morphological changes were observed in C. officinalis cv. ‘Zolotoe more’ than in cv. ‘Rajskij sad’. DMS and DES at low concentrations had positive effects on main agro-metrical traits in both cultivars including plant height, inflorescence diameter and number of inflorescences per plant. Dose-dependent increase in number of various meiotic abnormalities was revealed in both mutant lines. Comparative karyotype analysis and FISH-based visualization of 45S and 5S rDNA indicated a high level of karyotype stability in M1 and M2 plants. Seed treatments with DMS and DES at certain concentrations resulted in higher yields of inflorescences in M1 plants compared to the control. In M2 generation, dose-dependent reduction in the yields of inflorescences was observed. Our findings demonstrate that DMS and DES at low concentrations have great potential in calendula mutation breeding.

Subject terms: Disease prevention, Agricultural genetics

Introduction

A valuable medicinal plant, Calendula officinalis L. (Asteraceae), commonly known as calendula or pot marigold, is an annual aromatic herb with yellow or golden-orange flowers. This species is widely used in pharmaceutical industry, medicine, food and cosmetology1,2. The chemical composition of C. officinalis is well-determined. The flowers, leaves and stems contain flavonoids, xanthophylls, carotenoids, essential oils, coumarins (scopoletin) and water-soluble polysaccharides3,4. The raw material contains triterpenoid saponins 2–10% (oleanolic acid glycosides), triterpene alcohols (ψ-taraxasterol, taraxasterol, faradiol, arnidiol, heliantriol) and steroids. The seeds are rich in fatty acids (about 20%) including calendic acid (about 60%). It was shown that conjugated fatty acids are active substances for the treatment of obesity and also they can protect against cancer5–7. The flowers of C. officinalis contain rutin which has antioxidant, anti-inflammatory and anticarcinogenic activity1,8.

At the same time, polymorphism in active chemical compounds of the raw material was observed in C. officinalis, and also unstable active ingredients, e.g., carotinoids, were revealed9. Besides, calendula productivity was found to correlate with seed types and also a number of seed rows in inflorescences10. It is therefore important to direct research efforts towards the development of new promising C. officinalis cultivars with the desirable morpho-agronomic traits and/or biochemical profile.

Currently, for obtaining new plant cultivars with valuable economic traits, a mutagenesis approach is used alongside with transgenic crops and recombinant DNA technology. Particularly, chemical mutagenesis is an effective and simple method for obtaining valuable starting material for plant breeding as chemical mutagens (e.g., azide, diethyl sulphate, dimethyl sulphate, ethylmethane sulphonate and N-nitroso compounds) induce a high frequency of non-lethal point DNA mutations and generate novel genetic diversity in various crops11–20. As an example, seed treatment with low concentrations of sodium azide and diethyl sulphate was found to influence on seed germination percentage, plant height, leaf area, fresh plant weight, flowering date, inflorescence diameter and gas-exchange measurements in calendula plants of M1 and M2 generations. Also, these chemical mutagens had significant effects on total soluble proteins, acid phosphatase, and catalase activity fractions of the calendula leaves21.

Moreover, the quality and quantity of meiotic aberrations are considered to be reliable indicators of sub-lethal effects (doses) of chemical mutagens as well as an effective monitoring system for successful plant mutation breeding20,22. However, in C. officinalis, a comprehensive study of meiotic changes resulting from chemical mutagenesis has not been performed yet. Besides, currently available cytogenetic information regarding this species is rather scarce and mostly obtained by simple chromosome staining. It was shown, for example, that a karyotype of C. officinalis was composed by metacentric and submetacentric chromosomes which were small in size (1.5–3.5 µm)23–25. This is, probably, the reason why different karyotype formulas23 and chromosome numbers: 2n = 3223–26 and 2n = 2827, were described for this species. In one study, a more detailed FISH-based analysis of calendula karyotype was performed that revealed two large chromosome pairs bearing 45S rDNA loci and one pair with 5S rDNA loci27. However, chromosome variability in calendula mutant lines has not been investigated yet, although a comparative molecular cytogenetic analysis of C. officinalis cultivars and mutant lines could provide important information on possible karyotypic reorganization induced by chemical mutagens.

In the present study, we investigated the morphological, meiotic and chromosomal variability in two C. officinalis cultivars (cv. ‘Zolotoe more’ and cv. ‘Rajskij sad’) and their mutant lines (M1 and M2 generations) obtained though chemical mutagenesis using diethyl sulphate (DES) and dimethyl sulphate (DMS) mutagens.

Results

Plant morphology and productivity

The original calendula cultivars differed in their main agro-metrical traits. Plants of cv. ‘Zolotoe more’ were considerably lower, had less inflorescence diameters and golden-yellow (with a brown center part) semi-double flowers whereas plants of cv. ‘Rajskij sad’ had larger inflorescences with bright double orange flowers (Fig. 1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

Calendula plants and inflorescences. (a) Plants and (b) inflorescences of C. officinalis cv. Zolotoe more. (c) Plants and (d) inflorescences of C. officinalis cv. Rajskij sad.

In both studied C. officinalis cultivars, seed treatments with DMS and DES induced a number of morphological changes including plant dwarf, presence of several anthodiums in one inflorescence, polymorphism and fasciation of inflorescences, polypetalous flowers with an increased inflorescence diameter, etc. (Fig. 2). The studied calendula cultivars displayed different sensitivity to DMS and DES mutagens. More (in percentage terms) M1 plants with morphological changes were observed in C. officinalis cv. ‘Zolotoe more’ than in cv. ‘Rajskij sad’. (Table 1).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

M1 dwarf plants and polymorphic inflorescences of C. officinalis. (a) M1 dwarf plant and (b,c) polymorphic inflorescences of C. officinalis cv. Zolotoe more. (d) M1 dwarf plant and (e,f) polymorphic inflorescences of C. officinalis cv. Rajskij sad.

Table 1.

Mean performance levels of vegetative parameters in M1 plants of C. officinalis cv. ‘Zolotoe more’ and cv. ‘Rajskij sad’ following exposure to DMS and DES mutagens.

Type of the experiment Number of plants with morphological changes, % Plant height, cm Number of inflorescences per plant Inflorescence diameter, cm
cv. ‘Zolotoe more’
Control — 55.2 ± 0.90 11.0 ± 0.31 5.03 ± 0.17
DMS (0.04%) 12.2 ± 1.03 56.2 ± 1.07 14.8* ± 0.51 5.73* ± 0.18
DMS (0.08%) 17.1* ± 1.56 47.8* ± 1.98 10.2 ± 0.47 5.22 ± 0.19
DES (0.25%) 21.9* ± 2.05 48.8* ± 2.02 15.0* ± 0.88 5.08 ± 0.15
DES (0.05%) 25.9* ± 2.11 50.4* ± 3.04 14.6* ± 0.48 5.34* ± 0.17
cv. ‘Rajskij sad’
Control — 57.1 ± 1.23 11.3 ± 0.36 5.84 ± 0.19
DMS (0.04%) 4.6 ± 0.33 55.5 ± 1.60 16.3* ± 0.94 6.18 ± 0.17
DMS (0.08%) 5.3 ± 0.57 57.9 ± 1.83 12.6 ± 0.41 6.35* ± 0.18
DES (0.025%) 6.2* ± 0.58 57.6 ± 1.55 14.6* ± 0.51 6.07 ± 0.22
DES (0.05%) 8.3* ± 0.78 62.1 ± 2.04 17.5* ± 1.01 6.25* ± 0.20
Open in a new tab

*Values are significantly different at P ≤ 0.05.

Differences in the mean value of plant height were revealed between calendula mutant lines (Fig. 3a). In M1 and M2 plants of C. officinalis cv. ‘Zolotoe more’, plant height significantly reduced after the treatment with 0.08% DMS, 0.025% DES and 0.05% DES. In both M1 and M2 generations of cv. ‘Rajskij sad’, plant height slightly increased after the treatment with 0.08% DMS, 0.025% DES and 0.05% DES.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

Agro-morphological traits in M1 and M2 generations of C. officinalis cv. ‘Zolotoe more’ and cv. ‘Rajskij sad’. Plant height (a) number of branches (b) and inflorescences (c) per plant and also yields of inflorescences (d) (the vertical axis) in the original cultivars (control) and also in M1 and M2 plants following exposure to DMS and DES mutagens at different concentrations (the horizontal axis).

These chemical mutagens had no significant effects on number of branches per plant in both calendula cultivars. In M1 and M2 plants of both cultivars, the number of branches increased after the treatment with after 0.04% DMS (Fig. 3b).

DMS and DES mutagens had stimulated effects on the number of inflorescences per plant in most M1 and M2 plants of both cultivars with the exception of M1 and M2 plants of cv. ‘Zolotoe more’ after 0.08% DMS treatment (Fig. 3c). Also, treatments with DMS and DES mutagens resulted in an increase (in different degree) the inflorescences number and inflorescence diameter compared to the control (Table 1 and Fig. 3c). DMS was more effective than DES in increasing the inflorescence diameters, number of inflorescences and polypetalous flowers.

The yields of inflorescences were found to be different between the control calendula cultivars. In C. officinalis cv. ‘Zolotoe more’, it was higher (2001 kg/ha in 2014 and 2100 kg/ha in 2015) compared to cv. ‘Rajskij sad’ (1841 kg/ha in 2014 and 1853 kg/ha in 2015). The effects of different concentrations of both mutagens on calendula productivity were also different. In cv. ‘Zolotoe more’, the treatments with DMS and DES did not result in a higher yield of inflorescences in M1 plants compared to the control. In M2 generation, some reduction in the yields was observed. In cv. ‘Rajskij sad’, the treatments with 0.08% DMS (in both M1 and M2 plants) and 0.025% DES (in M1 plants) resulted in a significant increase in the yields (Fig. 3d).

Meiosis

In all studied C. officinalis specimens, analysis of meiosis indicated mostly sixteen bivalents (16II) at diakinesis and metaphase I (Fig. 4a). In plants of both original cultivars, the percentage of irregularities in pollen mother cells was negligible (1.13–1.28%).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

Chromosome behaviour during meiosis observed in the studied C. officinalis specimens. (a) diakinesis, 16II. (b) M-I, non-uniform chromosome distribution within the cell. (c) M-I, 9II + 1III + 1IV. (d) A-I, non-uniform chromosome distribution within the cell. (e) A-II, chromosomal bridge; (f) pentad.

In calendula mutant plants, the percentage of the observed meiotic disorders was higher (2.83% for cv. ‘Zolotoe more’ and 2.13% for cv. ‘Rajskij sad’). In particular, chromosome associations (trivalents, quadrivalents and also univalents located outside the metaphase plate) were detected (Fig. 4b,c). At anaphase I and II, most cells of the studied specimens had normal chromosome disjunction (16:16) but cells with abnormalities (e.g., lagging, chaotic disjunction, bridges, chromosome fragments, etc.) were also revealed (Fig. 4d,e). At the stage of the tetrad formation, the observed irregularities included pentads, hexads and presence of 1–2 micronuclei in one of the tetrad microspores (Fig. 4f). Moreover, in M1 plants of both studied mutant lines, a dose-dependent increase in the number of meiotic abnormalities was revealed (Fig. 5).

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Open in a new tab

Meiotic disorders in the studied C. officinalis specimens. The percentage (the vertical axis) of the meiotic abnormalities observed in plants of the original cultivars (control) and also M1 and M2 plants following exposure to DMS and DES mutagens at different concentrations (the horizontal axis).

Karyotype structure and DAPI-banding

Karyotypes of the studied C. officinalis cultivars and mutant lines contained 2n = 32 metacentric and submetacentric chromosomes including two satellite chromosomes pairs (1 and 9) with karyotype formula K = 2(4 m + 10 sm + 2 smst). The chromosome sizes ranged from 3.5 to 5.0 µm (Figs 6 and 7). Both satellite chromosomes had similar morphology with the prominent secondary constriction located in the pericentromeric region of the short arm. Satellite chromosome 1 was considerably larger than the other chromosomes in the karyotype. Also, heteromorphism of the satellite chromosomes was detected (more often, chromosome 1 in cv. ‘Zolotoe more’).

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Open in a new tab

FISH-based localization of 45S and 5S rDNA on C. officinalis chromosomes. Metaphase spreads of original (control) plants of C. officinalis cv. Zolotoe more (a) and cv. Rajskij sad (b) M2 mutant plants of C. officinalis cv. Zolotoe more (c) and cv. Rajskij sad. (d) Arrows point to minor 45S rDNA loci. The correspondent probes and their pseudo-colours are specified in the lower left-hand corner. Bar − 5 μm.

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Open in a new tab

Karyotypes of C. officinalis plants. Karyograms of C. officinalis chromosomes after DAPI-banding (inverted image) and FISH (only chromosomes with hybridizations sites). (a) Original (control) plants of cv. Zolotoe more. (b) M2 plants of cv. Zolotoe more after treatment with DES 0.025% and (c) DMS 0.04%; (d) original (control) plants of cv. Rajskij sad. (e) M2 plants of cv. Rajskij sad after treatment with DMS 0.08%.

Analysis of DAPI-banding patterns in karyotypes of the studied specimens showed that large DAPI-bands were located in the pericentromeric regions of chromosomes while small and middle-sized bands were detected in the intercalary and telomeric chromosome regions (Figs 6 and 7).

FISH

In karyotypes of the studied calendula specimens, major 45S rDNA sites were localized in the short arms of two chromosome pairs 1 and 9 (Figs 6, 7 and 8). The 45S rDNA site revealed on chromosome 9 was larger (more intensive) than that observed on chromosome 1. Also, a large (bright) 5S rDNA locus was detected in the pericentromeric region of the long arm of chromosome pair 10.

Figure 8.

Figure 8

Open in a new tab

Idiograms of C. officinalis chromosomes. Idiograms of C. officinalis chromosomes showing relative sizes and positions of DAPI-bands (black segments), 45S (green) and 5S (red) rDNA sites. Asterisks indicate minor 45S rDNA loci.

Moreover, in both cultivars, a minor polymorphic 45S rDNA site was revealed in the median region of the short arm of chromosome 5. Besides, in karyotypes of cv. ‘Zolotoe more’, another minor 45S rDNA locus, colocalized with 5S rDNA site, was revealed in one homolog of chromosome 10. In karyotypes of cv. ‘Rajskij sad’, this minor 45S rDNA locus was not detected (Figs 6, 7 and 8).

Based on chromosome morphology, DAPI-banding patterns and distribution of 45S and 5S rDNA sites, all chromosome pairs in the karyotypes were identified (for the first time) and chromosome idiograms of C. officinalis were constructed (Fig. 8).

In M2 plants of cv. ‘Zolotoe more’, the minor 45S rDNA sites observed on chromosomes 5 and 10 were polymorphic. After the treatment with 0.025% DES and 0.04% DMS, the pattern of chromosomal distribution of 45S and 5S rDNA sites was similar to that revealed in the control plants (cv. ‘Zolotoe more’). At higher mutagen concentrations (e.g., 0.08% DMS), the minor 45S rDNA sites were not visualized. In M2 plants of cv. ‘Rajskij sad’, the patterns of chromosomal distribution of 45S and 5S rDNA loci were mostly similar to the control plants. The exception was the treatment with 0.04% DMS. In this case, the minor 45S rDNA locus was not visualized.

In the studied C. officinalis karyotypes, any chromosomal rearrangements were not revealed.

Discussion

In the present study, DMS and DES mutagens stimulated the diversity in morphological characters of C. officinalis including plant height, number of inflorescences, inflorescence diameter, etc. Currently, an optimal plant height is a desirable agronomic trait that contributes to a high yield. Besides, the variation in calendula plant height is one of the initial associated traits in response to a mutagen treatment even at low concentrations21,28. In this study, DMS and DES treatments resulted in plant height changes in both C. officinalis cultivars, and our results are consistent with previous findings on other flowering plants including Salvia splendens29, Euonymus japonicus30 and Amaranthus31. At the same time, the observed variations in this important agronomic trait were dose-dependent, and those changes were different between the examined calendula cultivars. Considered all, the mean value of the plant height was less in M1 and M2 plants of cv. ‘Zolotoe more’ compared to the original cultivar (control). However, in M1 and M2 plants of cv. ‘Rajskij sad’, this parameter was more than in the control. These differences are probably related to different levels of plasticity in plants of the studied cultivars, and in some cases, mutagen-induced damages of the plant cells could be repaired at the initial ontogenesis stages10. In general, both examined mutagens induced the increase (in different degrees) in number of inflorescences, inflorescence diameter, shoots, and doubleness in flowers, and these findings agreed with the earlier reported data on DMS and DES mutagenic effects10,32. It is important to note, however, that the weather environment factors during growing period should also be considered in making an assessment of these mutagenic effects21,33.

Many chemical mutagens were shown to influence the plant genome and cause the meiotic disorders manifested themselves as typical chromosome aberrations (chromosome fragments, bridges, lagging, etc.) as well as mass fragmentation, nondisjunction, chromosome stickiness and other abnormalities20,34. Deviations from the normal bivalent conjugation could be displayed as univalent and multivalent formation at metaphase I stage35,36. In the studied calendula lines, alongside with normal meiotic segregation patterns, we observed various chromosomal associations at metaphase I (trivalents, quadrivalents and also univalents located aside of the plate or near the poles of the microsporocyte). The univalent formation induced by mutagens was supposed to be a result of changes in the structure of chromosomes followed by the reduction of chiasma frequency due to restriction of pairing to homologs37. The appearance of the multivalent associations is considered to be caused by mutagen-induced chromosome breaks followed by the reciprocal translocation joining38. Alternatively, these associations can be a result of chromosome mismatches and breakages which lead to translocations and inversions37,39–43.

Chromosome nondisjunction, occurred at anaphase I, is considered to be a serious meiotic abnormality which resulted in chromosome loss as well as unequal distribution of genetic material. Most cells of the studied here specimens had normal chromosome disjunction (16:16) at anaphase I and anaphase II, however, cells with abnormalities (e.g., chromosome lagging, chaotic disjunction, bridges, fragments, etc.) were also revealed. These disorders could be related to the paracentric inversions as previously described in tomatoes and Nigella sativa44.

Thus, in the present study, the analysis of the chromosome behaviour during meiosis revealed an increased number of microsporocytes with various meiotic disorders in calendula mutant lines if compared with the control. Moreover, a high level of phenotypic variability observed in the examined mutant lines could also be related to mutagen-induced chromosome mutations. An estimation of cytological abnormalities and their magnitude during mitosis or meiosis is believed to be a key component to determine the effect of a mutagen and also species sensitivity to sublethal doses in mutation breeding experiments20. At the same time, zygotes with chromosome mutations (appeared due to meiosis abnormalities) were shown not always to produce viable seeds45. Considering that karyotypes in M2 plants did not differ in chromosome number and morphology from the original calendula plants, our findings indicates that DMS and DES at low concentrations are rather effective mutagens for calendula breeding, which had positive effects on vegetative parameters without dramatic consequences for the calendula genome.

Basically, the results of karyotype study in the calendula cultivars agreed with earlier reported data which were mainly based on simple monochrome staining. At the same time, the application of DNA intercalator 9-AMA allowed us to obtain longer by half chromosomes in metaphase plates and also specify the morphology of C. officinalis chromosomes. As a result, the karyotype formula of C. officinalis reported here differed from that described earlier23 by a ratio of metacentric and submetacentric chromosomes. Moreover, we have identified two satellite chromosomes in the karyotypes and also specified the chromosome number of C. officinalis as both numbers 2n = 3223–26 and 2n = 2827 have been described before.

DAPI-banding was shown to reveal AT-rich heterochromatic regions46–48. In plant species with small chromosomes, chromosome banding patterns are usually rather poor which makes it difficult to identify precisely each chromosome in a karyotype49,50. Typically, in small-sized chromosomes, large heterochromatic bands located in the pericentromeric regions, small telomeric bands and few small intercalary bands are revealed51–54. The application of DNA intercalator 9-AMA allowed us to increase the resolution of chromosome DAPI-banding patterns, improve accuracy of physical mapping of rRNA genes, and then use these markers for analysis of calendula chromosomes. As a result, all chromosomes in karyotypes of C. officinalis original cultivars and mutant lines were identified for the first time. The results of FISH-based analysis of chromosomal distribution of major 45S and 5S rDNA in the original C. officinalis cultivars agreed with the currently available data27. Moreover, we detected minor 45S rDNA loci on chromosome 5 (both cultivars) and on one homolog of chromosome 10 (cv. ‘Zolotoe more’). These additional 45S rDNA loci were probably related to intraspecific genomic polymorphism.

In M2 plants, the analysis of chromosomal distribution of 45S and 5S rDNA sites revealed dose-dependent differences in localization of these minor 45S rDNA sites on chromosomes 5 and 10. Moreover, the plants of cv. ‘Zolotoe more’ were more sensitive to these mutagenic effects than cv. ‘Rajskij sad’.

The optimal conditions for pre-sowing seed treatments with chemical mutagens was shown to result in improved vegetative growth and flowering characteristics, increased yields and stress tolerance in comparison to normal plants19,55. Both DMS and DES mutagens were successfully applied for improving the vital characters of the floricultural crops including calendula10,21. Our results show that DMS and DES had positive effects on valuable agro-morphological traits in C. officinalis, and therefore these mutagens have great potential for improvements in the viability, yield and quality of calendula. Particularly, seed treatments with 0.08% DMS and 0.025% DES resulted in higher yields of inflorescences in M1 and M2 plants of cv. ‘Rajskij sad’ compared to the control. In cv. ‘Zolotoe more’, slight increase in the yields of inflorescences in M1 plants and dose-dependent reduction of this parameter in M2 plants were observed. Therefore, these chemical mutagens can stimulate useful traits in calendula genotypes, and this is very important for developing new promising cultivars in order to meet market demands. Currently, induced mutagenesis has become widespread in plant mutation breeding to solve a very wide range of problems, and particularly, this method is successfully used for developing improved crops within the Asteraceae family including Dendranthema grandiflora Tzvelev, Artemisia pallens Bess. and Helianthus annuus L.56–59.

Thus, our findings demonstrated that DMS and DES at certain concentrations had positive effects on morphological and yield attributes of calendula which could be useful for further breeding. At the same time, the studied C. officinalis cultivars displayed a different sensitivity to DMS and DES mutagens. This could be indicative of genetic polymorphism among C. officinalis cultivars, which correlates with variability in the cultivar characteristics. Therefore, a careful testing of these mutagens at different concentrations is required for successive realization of plant breeding programs.

Methods

Plant material

The calendula plants were grown in the Botanical garden of the All-Russian Institute of medicinal and aromatic plants (Moscow, Russian Federation) during two successive experimental seasons (summer 2014 and summer 2015). At late April 2014, seeds of C. officinalis cv. ‘Zolotoe more’ (K-36829, Russian Federation) and cv. ‘Rajskij sad’ (K-36837, Russian Federation) were treated with aqueous solutions of DMS (0.04% and 0.08%) and DES (0.025% and 0.05%) for 18 h. The control seeds were treated with water. The types of mutagens, their concentrations and treatment time were optimized based on our previous studies10 as well as early described data on application of chemical mutagens in breeding of horticultural crops10,21,32. After the mutagen treatment, the seeds were washed in water and sowed into the greenhouse for obtaining seedlings (M1 generation). At the stage of 4–5 true leaves, the seedlings were planted in the field in crop geometry of 60 cm × 30 cm according to the earlier described approach60. Plant vegetative parameters were measured at the stage of flower maturity of the plants. Seeds from the individual M1 plants were harvested and then used both for cytogenetic assays and for cultivation of M2 plants in the next growing season. At early May 2015, these seeds were sowed into the greenhouse and then grown in the field in the same way as M1 plants. The productivity (yield of inflorescences) of calendula plants was determined as a total sum of ten-round harvesting of inflorescences during the flowering period according to the earlier described approach60. Statistical data analysis was performed using standard functions of Microsoft Excel 2013.

Chromosome slide preparation

For FISH assays, the modified technique of chromosome spread preparation from root tips was applied. The seeds were germinated in Petri dishes on the moist filter paper at room temperature. Root tips (of 0.5–1 cm) were excised and stored for 16–20 h in ice-cold water with 1 µg/mL of 9-aminoacridine (9-AMA) (Sigma, St. Louis, USA) to inhibit chromosome condensation process and accumulate prometaphase chromosomes51,61,62. After the pre-treatment, the root tips were fixed in ethanol:acetic acid (3:1) fixative for 48 h at room temperature. Before squashing, the roots were transferred into 1% acetocarmine solution in 45% acetic acid for 15 min. The cover slips were removed after freezing in liquid nitrogen. The slides were dehydrated in 96% ethanol and stored at −20 °C until use.

For meiotic chromosome preparation, young floral buds (prefoliation) were fixed in ethanol:acetic acid (3:1) fixative for 30 min at 4 °C and then chromosome spreads were prepared as previously described63. After freezing in liquid nitrogen, the cover glasses were removed, and the slides were stored in 96% ethanol at −20 °C until use.

DNA probe preparation and FISH procedure

The following probes were used for FISH:

  1. pTa71 - a 9-kb-long sequence of common wheat encoding 18S, 5.8S, and 26S rRNA genes including spacers64. This DNA probe was labelled directly with SpectrumAqua (Abbott Molecular, Wiesbaden, Germany).

  2. pTa794 - a 420-bp-long sequence of wheat containing the 5S rRNA gene and intergenic spacer65. This DNA probe was labelled directly with SpectrumRed fluorochrome (Abbott Molecular, Wiesbaden, Germany).

FISH procedure was carried out according to Muravenko et al.51. After overnight hybridization, the slides were washed as described previously66.

DAPI-banding

After FISH procedure, chromosome slides were stained with 0.1 μg/ml DAPI (4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole) (Serva, Heidelberg, Germany) dissolved in Vectashield medium (Vector laboratories, Peterborough, UK).

Chromosome analysis

The slides were examined using an Olympus BX-61 epifluorescence microscope (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan). Images were captured with monochrome charge-coupled device camera (Cool Snap, Roper Scientific, Sarasota, USA). Then they were processed with Adobe Photoshop 10.0 software (Adobe, Birmingham, USA). At least 15 metaphase plates were investigated for each specimen. For meiosis analysis, at least 200 cells (10 plants) of each sample were analyzed. The meiotic chromosome preparations were analyzed as described previously52.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Russian Foundation of Basic Research (Project No. 18-016-00167), government assignment (No. 0576-2019-0008) and Program of Fundamental Research for State Academies (No. 0120136 3824).

Author Contributions

The present study was conceived and designed by T.E.S., S.A.Z. and O.V.M. T.E.S., S.A.Z., F.M.H., O.Yu.Yu., N.Yu.S., A.I.M. and A.V.A. performed the experiments and analyzed the data. T.E.S., S.A.Z., F.M.H., O.Yu.Yu., N.Yu.S., A.I.M., A.V.A. and O.V.M. prepared tables and figures and also wrote the manuscript. T.E.S., S.A.Z., A.V.A. and O.V.M. performed the analysis with constructive discussions. All authors reviewed the manuscript. Tatiana E. Samatadze and Svyatoslav A. Zoshchuk contributed equally to this work.

Data Availability

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Tatiana E. Samatadze and Svyatoslav A. Zoshchuk contributed equally.

References

  • 1.Khalid AK, Silva JA. Biology of Calendula officinalis Linn. Focus on Pharmacology, Biological Activities and Agronomic Practices. Med Aromat Plant Sci Biotech. 2012;6:12–27. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Shah PJ, Williamson MT. Synergistic activity of Calendula officinalis petal extract with cefotaxime on esbl producing Escherichia coli. Int J Pharm Biol Scie. 2018;8:419–425. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Haensel, R. & Sticher, O. Pharmakognosie-Phytopharmazie. Ueberarbeitete und aktialisierte Auflage. Heidelberg Springer 1151–1155 (2007).
  • 4.Hiller, K. & Melzig, M. F. Lexikon der Heilpflanzen und Drogen Heidelberg Spektrum. Akademischer Verlag 106–107 (2010).
  • 5.Suzuki R, et al. Cytotoxic effect of conjugated trienoic fatty acids on mouse tumor and human monocytic leukemia cells. Lipids. 2001;36:477–482. doi: 10.1007/s11745-001-0746-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Chardigny JM, et al. Effect of conjugated FA on feed in take, body composition, and liver FA in mice. Lipids. 2003;38:895–902. doi: 10.1007/s11745-003-1142-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Yasui Y, Hosokawa M, Kohno H, Tanaka T, Miyashita K. Growth inhibition and apoptosis induction by all-trans-conjugated linolenic acids on human colon cancer cells. Anticancer Res. 2006;26:1855–1860. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Bissa S, Bohra A. Antibacterial potential of pot marigold. J Microbiol Antimicrob. 2011;3:51–54. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Osipov VI, Bykov VA, Hazieva FM, Sidelnikov NI. Triterpenoids flowers of calendula (Calendula officinalis L.) Problems of biological, medical and pharmaceutical chemistry. 2018;21:3–9. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Hazieva FM, et al. Effect of chemical mutagens on Calendula officinalis L. Problems of biological, medical and pharmaceutical chemistry. 2014;4:66–67. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Rapoport, I. A. Discovery of chemical mutagenesis. Nauka, Moscow (1993).
  • 12.Singh, J. & Singh, S. Induced mutations in basmati rice (Oryza sativa L.). Diamond Jub. Symp. New Delhi (2001).
  • 13.Kharkwal, M. C., Pandey, R. N. & Pawar, S. E. Mutation breeding for crop improvement. In: Jain, H. K. & Kharkwal, M. C., (eds) Plant Breeding - Mendelian to Molecular Approaches. Narosa Publishing House. 601–645 (2004).
  • 14.Tah PR. Induced macromutation in mungbean (Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek.)) Int J Bot. 2006;2:219–228. doi: 10.3923/ijb.2006.219.228. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Mensah JK, Obadoni B. Effects of sodium azide on yield parameters of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) Afr J Biotechnology. 2007;6:668–671. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Roychowdhury R, Tah J. Chemical mutagenic action on seed germination and related agro-metrical traits in M1 Dianthus generation. Curr Bot. 2011;2:19–23. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Shu, Q. Y., Forster, B. P. & Nakagawa, H. Principles and applications of plant mutation breeding. In: Shu, Q. Y., Forster, B. P. & Nakagawa, H. (eds). Plant mutation breeding and biotechnology. Wallingford: CABI. pp. 301–325 (2012).
  • 18.Wani, M. R. et al. Mutation breeding: a novel technique for genetic improvement of pulse crops particularly Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). In: Ahmad, P., Wani, M. R., Azooz, M. M. & Tran, L. S. P. (eds) Improvement of Crops in the Era of Climatic Changes, Springer, New York, pp 217–248 (2014).
  • 19.Oladosu Y, et al. Principle and application of plant mutagenesis in crop improvement: a review. Biotechnology & Biotechnological Equipment. 2016;30:1–16. doi: 10.1080/13102818.2015.1087333. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Bhat, T. A. & Wani, A. A. Mutagenic effects on meiosis in Legumes and a practical case study of Vicia faba L. In: Chromosome Structure and Aberrations Editors: Bhat, T. A. & Wani, A. A. (eds) 11, 219–244 (2017).
  • 21.El-Nashar YI, Asrar AA. Phenotypic and biochemical profile changes in calendula (Calendula officinalis L.) plants treated with two chemical mutagenesis. Genet Mol Res. 2016;15:1–14. doi: 10.4238/gmr.15028071. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Butorina AK, Kalaev VN. Analysis of sensitivity of different criteria in cytogenetic monitoring Zebrina pendula Schnizl. Russ J Ecol. 2000;31:186–189. doi: 10.1007/BF02762819. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Murín A. Karyotaxonomy of some medicinal and aromatic plants. Thaiszia. 1997;7:75–88. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Probatova, N. S., Rudyka, E. G. & Shatalova, S. A. Chromosome numbers in some plant species from the environs of Vladivostok city (Primorsky Region). Bot. Žhurn. (Moscow and Leningrad) 86, 168–172 (2001).
  • 25.Chen, R. Y. et al. Chromosome atlas of major economic plants genome in China. V. 3. Chromosome atlas of garden flowering plants in China. Science Press, Beijing (2003).
  • 26.Soliman MI, Rizk RMH, Rizk RMA. The impact of seed polymorphism of plant genetic resources on the collection strategy of gene banks. Global Journal of Biotechnology and Biochemistry. 2008;3:47–55. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Garcia S, Panero JL, Siroky J, Kovarik A. Repeated reunions and splits feature the highly dynamic evolution of 5S and 35S ribosomal RNA genes (rDNA) in the Asteraceae family. BMC Plant Biol. 2010;10:176–186. doi: 10.1186/1471-2229-10-176. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Sinhamahapatra SP, Rakshit SC. Response to selection for plant height in X-ray treated population of jute (Corchorus caspularis L.) cv. JRC 212. Euphytica. 1990;51:95–99. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Hussein HAS, Sallam SH, Kamel HA, Labib T. The mutagenic effects of EMS on Salvia splendens. Egypt J Genet Cytol. 1974;3:193–203. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.El-Torky MG. Effect of EMS (ethylmethansulphonate) on variegation type and some other horticultural traits in Euonymus japonicus Linn. Alex. Agric Res. 1992;37:249–260. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.El-Nashar, Y. I. Effect of chemical mutagens (sodium azide and diethyl sulphate) on growth, flowering and induced variability in Amaranthus caudatus L. and A. hypochondriacus L. Dissertation, University of Egypt (2006).
  • 32.Kudina GA. Chemical mutagens in flower-ornamental plant selection. Industrial botany. 2006;6:116–120. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Abd El-Maksoud B, El-Mahrouk EM. Effect of ethyl methane sulfonate on the growth and interior quality of Asparagus densiflorus (Kunth) Jessop C.V. ≪SPRENGERI≫. Egypt J Appl Sci. 1992;7:116–132. [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Akif’ev AP, Beliaev PA, Grishanin AK, Degtiarev SV, Khudoliĭ GA. Chromosome aberrations, chromatin diminution and their significance in understanding the molecular genetic organization of eukaryotic chromosomes. Radiats Biol Radioecol. 1996;36:789–797. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Golubovskaya, I. N. Genetic Control of Meiosis. In: Khvostova, V. V. & Bogdanov, Yu. F. (eds) Cytology and senetics of meiosis, Nauka, Moscow, pp 312–343 (1975).
  • 36.Singh, B. R. J. Plant cytogenetics. Taylor & Francis Group, New York (2002).
  • 37.Zeerak NA. Cytogenetical effects of gamma rays and ethyl methane sulphonate in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum var. cerasiforme) Phytomorphology. 1992;42:81–86. [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Elliot, F. C. Plant Breeding and Cytogenetics. McGraw-Hill Book Co, New York (1958).
  • 39.Kumar G, Sinha SSN. Genotoxic effects of two pesticides (roger and Bavistin) and antibiotic (Streptomycin) in meiotic cells of grass pea (Lathyrus sativus) Cytologia. 1991;56:209–214. doi: 10.1508/cytologia.56.209. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Vandana S, Kumar DDK. Meiotic anomalies induced by EMS and DES in faba bean (Vicia faba) J Ind Bot Soc. 1996;75:237–240. [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Anis M, Wani AA. Caffeine induced morpho-cytological variability in Fenugreek, Trigonella foenum-graecum L. Cytologia. 1997;62:343–349. doi: 10.1508/cytologia.62.4_343. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Kumar G, Gupta P. Induced karyo-morphological variations in three phenol-deviants of Capsicum annuum L. Turk J Biol. 2009;33:123–128. [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Jayabalan N, Rao GR. Gamma radiation induced cytological abnormalities in Lycopersicon esculentum Mill. Var. Pusa Ruby. Cytol. 1987;52:1–4. doi: 10.1508/cytologia.52.1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Mitra PK, Bhowmik G. Cytological abnormalities in Nigella sativa induced by gamma rays and EMS. J Cytol Genet. 1996;31:205–215. [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Samatadze TE, et al. A comparative analysis of karyotypes of three species of Macleaya - producers of a complex of isoquinoline alkaloids. Biol Bull. 2012;39:515–524. doi: 10.1134/S1062359013060125. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Scweizer D. Fluorescent chromosome banding in plants; applications, mechanisms, and implications for chromosome structure. Theor Appl Genet. 1985;71:408–412. doi: 10.1007/BF00251180. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Barros E, Silva AE, Guerra M. The meaning of DAPI bands observed after C-banding and FISH procedures. Biotech Histoche. 2010;85:115–125. doi: 10.3109/10520290903149596. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Lavania UC, Kushwaha J, Lavania S, Basu S. Chromosomal localization of rDNA and DAPI bands in solanaceous medicinal plant Hyoscyamus niger L. J Genet. 2010;89:493–496. doi: 10.1007/s12041-010-0071-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Pierozzi NI, Pinto-Maglio CAF, Cruz ND. Characterization of somatic chromosomes of two diploid species of Coffea L. with acetic orcein and C-band techniques. Caryol. 1999;52:1–8. doi: 10.1080/00087114.1998.10589147. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Pinto-Maglio CAF. Cytogenetics of coffee. Braz J Plant Physiol. 2006;18:37–44. doi: 10.1590/S1677-04202006000100004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Muravenko OV, et al. 9-aminoacridin- an efficient reagent to improve human and plant chromosome banding patterns and to standardize chromosome image analysis. Cytometry. 2003;51:52–57. doi: 10.1002/cyto.a.10002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Samatadze TE, et al. Molecular cytogenetic characterization, leaf anatomy and ultrastructure of the medicinal plant Potentilla alba L. Genet Resour Crop Evol. 2018;65:1637–1647. doi: 10.1007/s10722-018-0640-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Guerra M. Patterns of heterochromatin distribution in plant chromosomes. Genet Mol Biol. 2000;23:1029–1041. doi: 10.1590/S1415-47572000000400049. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Yurkevich OY, et al. Investigation of genome polymorphism and seedcoat anatomy of species of section Adenolinum from the genus Linum. Genet Resour Crop Evol. 2013;60:661–676. doi: 10.1007/s10722-012-9865-z. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Khan S, Al-Qurainy F, Anwar F. Sodium azide: A chemical mutagen for enhancement of agronomic traits of crop plants. Environ Int J Sci Tech. 2009;4:1–21. [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Rocha LR, Hernán Adames A, Tulmann NA. In vitro mutation of Chrysanthemum (Dendranthema grandiflora Tzvelev) with Ethylmethanesulphonate (EMS) in immature floral pedicels. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture. 2004;77:103–106. doi: 10.1023/B:TICU.0000016481.18358.55. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Rekha K, Langer A. Induction and assessment of morpho-biochemical mutants in Artemisia pallens Bess. Genet Resour Crop Evol. 2007;54:437–443. doi: 10.1007/s10722-006-9113-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Kumar Anish PK, Boualem Adnane, Bhattacharya Anjanabha, Parikh Seema, Desai Nirali, Zambelli Andres, Leon Alberto, Chatterjee Manash, Bendahmane Abdelhafid. SMART -- Sunflower Mutant population And Reverse genetic Tool for crop improvement. BMC Plant Biology. 2013;13(1):38. doi: 10.1186/1471-2229-13-38. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Zambelli, A., Leon, A. & Garcés, R. Mutagenesis in Sunflower. In book: Sunflower Oilseed. Chemistry, Production, Processing and Utilization (ed. MartÍnez, F.) 27–52 (AOCS Press, 2015).
  • 60.Dospehov, B. А. Methods of field experience. (With the basics of statistical processing of research results). Agropromizdat, Moscow (1985).
  • 61.Muravenko OV, et al. Comparison of genomes of eight species of sections Linum and Adenolinum from the genus Linum based on chromosome banding, molecular markers and RAPD analysis. Genetica. 2009;135:245–255. doi: 10.1007/s10709-008-9273-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Amosova AV, et al. Intraspecific chromosomal and genetic polymorphism in Brassica napus L. detected by cytogenetic and molecular markers. J Genet. 2014;93:133–143. doi: 10.1007/s12041-014-0351-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Samatadze TE, et al. Comparative cytogenetic study of the tetraploid Matricaria chamomilla L. and Matricaria inodora L. Biol Bull. 2014;2:123–132. doi: 10.1134/S1062359013060125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Gerlach WL, Bedbrook JR. Cloning and characterization of ribosomal RNA genes from wheat and barley. Nucleic Acids Res. 1979;7:1869–1885. doi: 10.1093/nar/7.7.1869. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Gerlach WL, Dyer TA. Sequence organization of the repeating units in the nucleus of wheat which contain 5S rRNA genes. Nucleic Acids Res. 1980;8:4851–4865. doi: 10.1093/nar/8.21.4851. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Amosova AV, et al. Genomic changes in generations of synthetic rapeseed-like allopolyploid grown under selection. Euphytica. 2017;9:213–217. doi: 10.1007/s10681-017-2009-y. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES