With this year’s influenza season officially over, it’s time to pause and reflect on lessons learned. Despite the availability of influenza vaccination, this infection continues to pose a significant burden and an important strain on the healthcare system each year.
Identifying patients with influenza based on their signs and symptoms is quite straight-forward in the clinic during the cold season, and with access to rapid molecular diagnostics, laboratory confirmation can be obtained within a few hours following the initial patient consult.
However, when it comes to epidemiological surveillance, a systematic approach needs to be consistently applied and it is here that case definitions have been a matter of debate. Definitions for influenza-like illness (ILI) and severe acute respiratory infection (SARI) combine clinical signs and symptoms that occur suddenly within a specified time-frame, being suggestive for acute respiratory illness.
Recent studies have discussed whether all the “classical” ILI criteria are indeed needed. While the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control defines clinical influenza criteria as “at least one systemic symptom (among fever/ feverishness, malaise, headache, myalgia) and at least one respiratory symptom (among cough, sore throat, shortness of breath)”,1 the World Health Organization (WHO) has simplified the case definitions in 2011 and 2014, to include only “fever ≥38°C (or history of fever) plus cough,”2 since these two criteria appear to yield the best balance of sensitivity and specificity, and can be assessed in all age groups. The definition of fever has also been subject to discussion, particularly for elderly patients, where the threshold could be set as low as 37.3°C to increase the case definition performance.3
The time-frame for assessing ILI or SARI criteria, generally regarded as 7 days, was revised by WHO to 10 days,2 although not all epidemiological studies, including those performed at our facility, have yet incorporated this revision.
In conclusion, since any given definition comes with advantages and disadvantages, when it comes to epidemiological surveillance, consistency is key. Regardless of the definition used, it is essential to be consistent from season to season, in order to generate an accurate picture, based on information that can be compared from year to year, allowing trend analysis.
Footnotes
Authors’ contributions statement: All authors had equal contributions.
Conflicts of interest: OS, AD and DP have been involved in influenza studies: GIHSN (Sanofi Pasteur and Foundation for Influenza Epidemiology) and DRIVE (EU/EFPIA Innovative Medicines Initiative 2 Joint Undertaking).
Funding: None to declare for this manuscript.
References
- 1.Commission implementing decision (EU) 2018/945 of 22 June 2018 on the communicable diseases and related special health issues to be covered by epidemiological surveillance as well as relevant case definitions. (OJ L 170, 6.7.2018, p. 24)
- 2.Fitzner J, Qasmieh S, Mounts AW, et al. Revision of clinical case definitions: influenza-like illness and severe acute respiratory infection. Bull World Health Organ. 2018;96:122–8. doi: 10.2471/BLT.17.194514. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Falsey AR, Baran A, Walsh EE. Should clinical case definitions of influenza in hospitalized older adults include fever? Influenza Other Respir Viruses. 2015;9:23–9. doi: 10.1111/irv.12316. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]