Abstract
Background
The E2A gene, which encodes two basic helix–loop–helix transcription factors, E12 and E47, regulates colorectal cancer progression and epithelial-mesenchymal transition. However, whether E2A regulates the tumor-initiating capacity of colorectal cancer is unclear. Thus, we have studied E2A expression in the initiation of colorectal cancer in vivo and in vitro.
Methods
Immunohistochemistry and immunoblot were performed to determine protein levels of E2A in colorectal cancer specimens and cells. RNAi was employed to downregulate E2A expression, and the subsequent change in protein level was evaluated by immunoblot. Sphere-forming assay and enumeration of liver metastasis in mouse models were used to identify the tumor formation ability of colorectal cancer cells.
Results
E2A expression in colorectal cancer clinical specimens was inversely associated with patients’ progression-free survival. Functional studies demonstrated that E2A significantly decreased tumor formation in vitro and in vivo. Furthermore, nuclear translocation of beta-catenin and activation of the Wnt/beta-catenin pathway occurred after suppression of E2A in colorectal cancer cells. FoxM1 was identified as a down-stream target by mRNA microarray, implying that FoxM1 plays a main role in determining how E2A regulates the tumor-initiating capacity of colorectal cancer.
Conclusion
E2A suppresses tumor-initiating capacity by targeting the FoxM1-Wnt/β-catenin pathway.
Electronic supplementary material
The online version of this article (10.1186/s13046-019-1261-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Keywords: Helix–loop–helix protein e12, Helix-loop-helix protein e47, Transcription factors, Epithelial-mesenchymal transition, FoxM1 protein, Human, Tumor suppressor gene
Introduction
Colorectal cancer (CRC) includes a group of heterogeneous malignant tumors arising in any part of the large intestine, with the capacity to spread to other tissues of the body, mostly to the liver and lung [1]. CRC is one of the most prevalent malignancies leading to cancer-related death worldwide, ranking third in men and women [2]. Most cancer-related deaths are caused by cancer metastasis [3]. The metastasis cascade is a two-phase process: In the first phase, cancer cells in primary tumors break away from the microenvironment and invade via the basement membrane. In the second phase, the cancer cells develop into a metastatic, full-fledged tumor at a distant site [4, 5]. The second phase takes place only if the cancer cells possess a tumor-initiating ability [6]; this ability is not well understood.
Genetic instability spawns distinct clonal subpopulations, which are accompanied by tumor progression, resulting in clonal heterogeneity in tumors [7]. Accumulating evidence points to the existence of a subclass of neoplastic cells within tumors that have the ability to self-renew, resist chemotherapy, and seed as secondary tumors; these cells are termed cancer stem cells [8–11]. The origin of cancer stem cells is controversial, but cancer cells gaining stem-cell properties as they undergo epithelial-mesenchymal transitions (EMT) have been reported [12, 13]. Through EMT, cancer cells with differentiated epithelial phenotypes lose apicobasal polarity, become motile, and express markers characteristic of mesenchymal cells [14–16]. For instance, ectopic expression of beta-catenin, which is strongly correlated with EMT in CRC cells, has caused dedifferentiation of post-mitotic intestinal epithelial cells, leading to the generation of tumor-initiating cells in vivo [17, 18].
E12 and E47, two basic helix–loop–helix (bHLH) transcription factors, are encoded by the E2A gene through variant splicing [19]. E12 and E47, which belong to the class I bHLH family, regulate target genes by binding DNA with tissue-specific Class II HLH proteins, either as homodimers or heterodimers [20–22]. It has been reported [23, 24] that E12/E47 expression was decreased in CRC tissues and inhibited the proliferation and metastasis of CRC cells in vitro. In addition, we found that shE2A induced EMT and up-regulated the expression of beta-catenin in CRC cells [24]. The effects of E2A on the tumor-initiating capacity of CRC cells remains unclear.
In the present study, we examined E2A expression in CRC tissues in relation to progression-free survival of CRC patients. Decreased expression of E2A promoted the tumorigenic capacity of CRC cells in vivo and in vitro. Functional assays revealed that the canonical Wnt/β-catenin pathway critically affects E2A on CRC cells. Furthermore, we identified FoxM1 as a novel target of E2A and showed that FoxM1 plays a critical role in E2A-regulated inhibition of cancer-initiating capacity.
Materials and methods
Cell culture
Human CRC cell lines, SW480 and Caco-2, were purchased from the American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA, USA). SW480 was cultured in Leibovitz’s L-15 Medium (Corning Cellgro®, Manassas, VA, USA) and Caco-2 in MEM Medium (Corning Cellgro®). All culture media were supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). Cells were maintained at 37 °C/5% CO2 in a humidified incubator. Recombinant human Wnt3a (R&D System, Minneapolis, MN, USA) was used at a concentration of 100 ng/mL for treating Caco-2/E12 and Caco-2/E47 cells to activate β-catenin. CGP049090 (Sigma-Aldrich, Lyon, France), a small-molecule inhibitor of Wnt/β-catenin, was diluted in 10 μM for treating SW480/shE2A cells.
Clinical specimens
The clinical research protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University. Two hundred sixteen surgical specimens of primary CRC tumors were obtained from The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, in 2015–2017, with written informed consent given by all patients before operation. Patients were excluded if they had received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, had unresectable colorectal cancers, had tumors of other organs, or were unlikely to be interviewed during the follow-up. The demographic and clinic-pathological characteristics of all included patients are presented in Table 1. Fresh tumor tissues were harvested immediately after dissection, snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen, and preserved at − 80 °C. Tumors were classified/staged according to the Cancer Staging Manual of the International Union Against Cancer (7th edition, 2009).
Table 1.
CHARACTERISTIC | Number (%) of cases |
---|---|
Age | |
40–59 | 75 (34.7%) |
60–79 | 130 (60.2%) |
> 80 | 11 (5.1%) |
Gender | |
Male | 119 (55.1%) |
Female | 97 (44.9%) |
Tumor histology | |
Tubular adenocarcinoma | 126 (58.3%) |
Mucinous adenocarcinoma | 74 (34.3%) |
Papillary adenocarcinoma | 16 (7.4%) |
Tumor site | |
Rectum and sigmoid | 97 (44.9%) |
Right colon | 94 (43.5%) |
Left colon | 25 (11.6%) |
Tumor size | |
≤ 5 cm | 103 (47.7%) |
> 5 cm | 113 (52.3%) |
TNM stage | |
I | 57 (26.4%) |
II | 62 (28.7%) |
III | 80 (37.0%) |
IV | 17 (7.9%) |
Immunohistochemistry staining and scoring of each slide was performed as previously described [23]. Slides were examined by two researchers (Liu and Zhang) independently. Staining intensity was scored as 0 (no staining), 1 (weak staining), 2 (moderate staining), and 3 (strong staining); positive cells on each section were scored as 0 (< 10%), 1 (10–25%), 2 (26–50%), and 3 (> 50%). The final score was a product of the intensity scores and the number of positive cells per slide. Slides with a score of 0–3 were defined as low expression and those with a score of 4–9 were defined as high expression.
Establishment of stable cell lines and transient transfection
Plasmids pL/shRNA/F-shR with shE2A or shNC (negative control) (Novobio, Shanghai, China) were applied in lentivirus transfection to SW480 cells for establishing shE2A/shNC-expressing stable clones, according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Plasmids, pEZ-M29-E12 and pEZ-M29-E47, encoding fusion proteins eGFP-E12 and eGFP-E47 were purchased from Genecopoeia (Rockville, MD, USA). Short hairpin RNA (shRNA) against human FoxM1 and shRNA-negative control (shNC) were bought from GenePharma (Shanghai, China). Transient transfection was conducted according to established protocols [24]. Levels of the targeted genes were assessed with immunoblot, with glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) as the loading control.
Protein extraction and immunoblot
Cell lysate preparation and immunoblot analysis were performed according to established protocols [25]. A radioimmunoprecipitation buffer (Solarbio, Beijing, China), containing a protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche Applied Science, Basel, Switzerland) and a phosphatase inhibitor cocktail (CST), was used to extract total protein, and the Subcellular Protein Fractionation Kit for Cultured Cells (Thermo-Fisher Scientific; Waltham, MA, USA) was used according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Western blot was conducted according to standard protocol, with primary antibodies of E2A (Santa Cruz, Dallas, Texas, USA), β-catenin (Cell Signaling Technol.), Phospho-β-Catenin (Ser33/37/Thr41) (Cell Signaling Technol.), TCF-1 (Cell Signaling Technol.), Lgr5 (Abcam, Cambridge, UK.), FoxM1 (Cell Signaling Technol.), and cyclin D1 (Cell Signaling Technol.). Goat anti-mouse or goat anti-rabbit IgG conjugated to horseradish peroxidase (HRP; Pierce, Rockford, IL, USA) was used as the secondary antibody. SuperSignal West Pico Chemiluminescent Substrate (Pierce) was used for visualizing chemiluminescent signals; the signal intensity was analyzed with Image Lab™ Software Version 4.0.1 (BIO-RAD, Hercules, CA, USA). The experiments were performed in triplicate, with GAPDH (Kangchen, Shanghai, China) or specificity protein 1 (SP1, Cell Signaling Technology) used as the endogenous control.
Sphere-forming assay
Cells were harvested with 0.25% trypsin/EDTA and suspended at a concentration of 5 × 105 cells/mL in tryptose sulfite cycloserine medium (minimal essential medium supplemented with 10 ng/mL epidermal growth factor) (Thermo-Fisher Scientific), 10 ng/mL basic fibroblast growth factor (Thermo-Fisher Scientific), 10 ng/mL Noggin (Thermo-Fisher Scientific) and 1000 U/mL leukemia inhibitory factor (Thermo-Fisher Scientific). Cells were cultured in 3.5-cm dishes precoated with poly-hema for 14 d to form colonies.
Liver metastasis in mouse models
All animal procedures were performed with the approval of the Local Medical Experimental Animal Care Commission of the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University. Four-week-old male BALB/c nu/nu mice were purchased from the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, and raised in a specific-pathogen-free environment. Six nude mice were included in each group for establishment of the liver metastasis model. Laparotomies on anesthetized mice were performed to expose the spleen, followed by slow injection of 1 × 107 cells into the spleen. The spleen was returned to the abdominal cavity, and the injected cells flowed via the circulatory system to the liver. Six weeks after injection, the mice were euthanized, and hematoxylin-eosin-stained sections of liver were examined microscopically for metastases.
mRNA microarray
Microarray experiments were performed by KangChen Bio-tech, Shanghai, China. The Agilent Whole Genome Oligo Microarray (Santa Clara, CA, USA) was used to identify mRNA transcripts with differential expression between SW480/shE2A cells and SW480/shNC cells. CRC cell samples were used for the array analysis according to the manufacturer’s protocol in quadruplicate.
TCF/LEF reporter luciferase assay
TCF/LEF reporter luciferase assay was performed with a TCF/LEF Reporter Kit (BPS Bioscience, San Diego, CA, USA). SW480/shE2A cells treated with/without CGP049090 and SW480/shNC were transfected with pTOPFLASH (Tcf/Lef reporter) and pFOP-FLASH (mutated Tcf/Lef binding sites) for 48 h. Luciferase activity was measured with the Dual Luciferase Reporter Assay (Promega, Madison, WI, USA). Firefly luciferase activity was normalized to Renilla luciferase activity for each transfected well. All transfection experiments were conducted in triplicate and repeated three times independently. Data are expressed as the mean ± SD.
Statistical analysis
A two-tailed Student’s t-test, χ2 Test, multivariate Cox’s proportional hazards models, and one-way ANOVA were used for statistical analysis as appropriate. The effect of E2A on survival was estimated with the Kaplan-Meier curve and log-rank test. All statistical analyses were performed with SPSS 16.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). A two-tailed value of P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results
E2A expression correlates with progression-free survival of CRC
As previously described [22], E2A expression is decreased in CRC tissues. The tumor-initiating capacity of cancer cells induces cell proliferation in CRC after surgery, which leads to tumor recurrence and metastasis. To verify whether expression of E2A is correlated with progression-free survival, we evaluated the expression of E2A protein in 216 CRC tissues with immunohistochemistry staining (Fig. 1a). Using Kaplan-Meier 5-year survival curves, we examined the differences in outcomes between CRC patients with low and high E2A expression. Patients with high E2A expression had longer 5-year progression-free survival than did patients with low expression (Fig. 1b): 73.2% versus 55.1 (P < 0.05). We also performed multivariate Cox regression analysis for PFS in CRC patients, which revealed that E2A expression predicted worse PFS (Table 2, OR 1.86, 95%CI 1.17–2.95, P = 0.009). Hence, E2A expression seems to be a predictor for progression-free survival in CRC patients.
Table 2.
PFS | OR | 95%CI | P |
---|---|---|---|
Age | 1.001 | 0.980–1.022 | 0.947 |
Gender | 1.061 | 0.648–1.737 | 0.814 |
Tumor Histology | 1.060 | 0.746–1.507 | 0.744 |
Tumor Size | 1.314 | 0.801–2.153 | 0.279 |
Tumor Site | 0.637 | 0.392–1.035 | 0.068 |
E2A expression | 1.86 | 1.17–2.95 | 0.009 |
TNM stage | 4.53 | 3.131–6.554 | 0.000 |
The putative role of Lgr5 as a CRC stem-cell marker [25, 26] has aroused attention. Therefore, we evaluated Lgr5 expression in CRC with immunohistochemistry (Fig. 1a). As illustrated in Table 3, the expression of E2A was inversely associated with Lgr5 expression (P < 0.05), which indicates that E2A expression may correlate with tumor-initiating capacity of CRC cells. To study the relationship between E2A, Lgr5 and patients’ progression-free survival, we performed Kaplan-Meier analyses, as illustrated in Fig. 1c. The E2A + Lgr5- group had the longest 5-year progression-free survival, and the E2A-Lgr5+ group had the shortest survival (P < 0.05); there was no significant difference in progression-free survival between the E2A-Lgr5- group and E2A + Lgr5+ group (P > 0.05).
Table 3.
Lgr5 high expression | Lgr5 low expression | Total | |
---|---|---|---|
E2A high expression | 43 (19.9%) | 84 (38.8%) | 127 (58.8%) |
E2A low expression | 52 (24.1%) | 37 (17.1%) | 89 (41.2%) |
Total | 95 (44%) | 121 (55.9%) | 216 (100%) |
P < 0.01 |
χ2 Test was used to test the correlation between E2A and LGR5 expression (P < 0.01)
E2A suppresses the tumor-initiating capacity of CRC cells in vitro
We transfected LV-shE2A into SW480 cells to establish SW480/shE2A-stable clones, with LV-shNC as the control. In sphere-forming assays, SW480/shE2A cells had more tumor-initiating capacity than SW480 and SW480/shNC cells (Fig. 2a). On the other hand, when we transfected plasmid pEZ-M29-E12 or pEZ-M29-E47 into Caco-2 cells, to ectopically express E12 or E47 (named Caco-2/E12 and Caco-2/E47), both E12 and E47 reduced the sphere-forming capacity of the Caco-2 cells (Fig. 2b); there was no significant difference between Caco-2/E12 and Caco-2/E47 cells in this activity.
Given that Lgr5 is a crucial marker of CRC stem cells, we used western blot analysis to determine whether E2A regulates Lgr5 expression in CRC cells. As expected, Lgr5 expression in SW480 cells was increased after transfection with shE2A (Fig. 2c). Consistent with this result, Caco-2 cells transfected with E12 or E47 plasmid had decreased Lgr5 expression compared with that in Caco-2/NC cells (Fig. 2d). To further demonstrate the role of E2A in the regulation of Lgr5 expression, we performed immunofluorescence experiments to visualize Lgr5 in transfected SW480 cells. Consistent with immunoblot results, immunofluorescence showed that Lgr5 was increased in SW480/shE2A cells compared with that in SW480 and SW480/shNC cells. Furthermore, both E12 and E47 down-regulated the expression of Lgr5 in Caco-2 cells (Fig. 2e). Together, these results indicate that E2A can inhibit CRC cell tumor-initiating capacity.
E2A suppressed CRC liver metastasis in vivo
To determine whether E2A is involved in CRC cell tumor-initiating capacity in vivo, we generated a liver metastasis model with nude mice. Significantly more metastatic nodules developed in the SW480/shE2A mice than in the SW480 and SW480/shNC mice (Fig. 3a and b; P < 0.05). Evidently, CRC cells traveled to the liver through the portal vein, where their tumor-initiating ability induced proliferation.
The Wnt/β-catenin pathway is crucial for E2A in CRC-cell tumor initiation
Previously, we found that β-catenin was increased in SW480 cell nuclei after knockdown of E2A [24]. To confirm that observation, we performed nuclear protein extraction and western blot analyses. Figure 4a shows that β-catenin expression in SW480/shE2A cell nuclei was higher than in SW480/shNC and SW480 cell nuclei. In accordance with that finding, ectopic expression of E12 and E47 in Caco-2 cells reduced the amount of β-catenin in cell nuclei. To assess the influence of E2A on the Wnt/β-catenin pathway, we measured TCF-1 and cyclin D1 by Western blot, which are important effectors in the Wnt/β-catenin pathway [26]. As illustrated in Fig. 4b, the expression of TCF-1 and cyclin D1 were up-regulated by shE2A transfection. In Caco-2 cells, TCF-1 and cyclin D1 were decreased after E12 and E47 overexpression (Fig. 4c). We then investigated whether the decreased Wnt/β-catenin pathway was responsible for the E2A-induced inhibition of tumor-initiating capacity. SW480/shE2A cells were treated with CGP049090, which is a molecular inhibitor of the Wnt/β-catenin pathway. As illustrated in the upper panel of Fig. 4d, SW480/shE2A cells treated with CGP049090 had significantly less tumor-initiating capacity than did untreated cells, and the capacity was like that of SW480/shNC cells, as shown in sphere-formation assay. In addition, as illustrated in the upper panel of Fig. 4e, the same kind of change was seen with Lgr5: CGP049090 reduced the expression of Lgr5 in SW480/shE2A cells to the same level as in SW480/shNC cells. Next, we applied recombinant human Wnt3a, which can activate the Wnt/β-catenin pathway, to Caco-2/E12 and Caco-2/E47 cells to antagonize the effect of E12 and E47 on Caco-2 cells. As shown in Fig. 4d, Wnt3a enhanced the tumor-initiating capacity of Caco-2/E12 and Caco-2/E47 cells to the levels of Caco-2 cells. Also, the expression of Lgr5 was up-regulated after Caco-2/E12 and Caco-2/E47 cells were treated with Wnt3a (Fig. 4e, lower panel). Together, these experiments indicate that E2A impaired CRC cell tumor-initiating capacity in a Wnt/β-catenin-dependent manner.
FoxM1 is a downstream target through which E2A suppresses CRC cell tumor-initiating capacity
To further identify new targets of E2A and understand the mechanisms underlying E2A’s tumor suppressive function in CRC, we used mRNA microarray for a target search (Fig. 5a and b). Among the genes, FoxM1 had different effects on SW480/shE2A and SW480/shNC cells. Furthermore, previous reports indicated that FoxM1 promotes β-catenin nuclear localization and regulates stemness of CRC cells [27, 28]. According to the UALCAN database (http://ualcan.path.uab.edu/index.html, accessed 24 May 2018), FoxM1 expression was higher in colon cancer tissues than in normal tissues (Additional file 1: Figure S1 A, P < 0.05). Furthermore, Kaplan-Meier survival curves revealed that high expression of FoxM1 in colon cancer correlated with poor survival (Additional file 1: Figure S1 B, P < 0.05). Additionally, the PPI (Protein-protein interaction) protein network generated by Genemania (http://genemania.org/, accessed 18 July 2018) showed the relationship between E2A, FoxM1 and β-catenin (Fig. 5c). To validate the change in expression of FoxM1, we performed RT-PCR of SW480 and Caco-2 cells and found that FoxM1 mRNA was increased in SW480/shE2A cells; however, it was decreased when we transfected E12 and E47 into Caco-2 cells (Fig. 5d). In parallel with the mRNA alteration, the FoxM1 protein expression level of SW480 cells was up-regulated by shE2A and decreased in Caco-2 cells by E12 and E47 plasmid transfection (Fig. 5e). Together, these experiments indicate that FoxM1 mRNA and protein levels are regulated by E2A.
Next, we investigated whether the increased FoxM1 in SW480/shE2A cells can lead to enhanced tumor-initiating capacity. To this end, transient transfection of shFoxM1 was performed in SW480/shE2A cells to down-regulate FoxM1 (Fig. 5f). As illustrated in Fig. 5g, compared with cells transfected with negative control or blank cells, the sphere-forming ability of SW480/shE2A cells was reduced by shFoxM1 to the same levels as that in SW480/shNC cells. This finding suggests that the enhanced FoxM1 by shE2A in SW480 cells is critical in the regulation of sphere formation. Besides, downregulation of FoxM1 decreased the expression of Lgr5 in SW480 cells (Fig. 5h). More importantly, β-catenin expression in Caco-2 cell nuclei was reduced to 40% of normal values after shFoxM1 transfection, and changes of TCF-1 and cyclin D1 suggested there was suppression of the Wnt/β-catenin pathway (Additional file 1: Figure S1D). To further define the role of FoxM1 in β-catenin regulation in cell nuclei, we performed immunofluorescence experiments to visualize β-catenin in transfected Caco-2 cells. In accordance with immunoblot results, these experiments revealed that β-catenin was decreased in Caco-2 cell nuclei after shFoxM1 transfection (Additional file 1: Figure S1C). Thus, FoxM1 is a target through which E2A regulates the Wnt/β-catenin pathway to suppress invasion and migration in CRC cells. A schematic diagram of our study results is presented in Fig. 5i.
Discussion
Distant metastases, rather than the primary tumors from which they arise, are responsible for > 90% of carcinoma-associated mortality [29]. The formation of metastatic tumors is a multistep process, mediated by complex cascades of molecular events that govern cancer-cell migration and tumor-initiating ability to induce cancer-cell proliferation in distant organs [30]. In our previous study, E2A inhibited the invasion/migration process by reducing YAP expression in CRC cells, in which β-catenin translocation to cell nuclei occurred after silencing E2A expression in SW480 cells [24]. As a core factor in canonical Wnt signaling, β-catenin translocated to cell nuclei, bound to transcriptional complexes, and promoted transcription of targeting genes, such as cyclin D1 and TCF1 [31]. Given that the canonical Wnt pathway activates the stem-cell property of cancer cells, in the present study, we demonstrated the suppressive role of E2A in CRC cell tumor-initiating capacity by regulating β-catenin translocation. Furthermore, we found that FoxM1 is a downstream target of E2A in CRC cells.
E2A has been called a regulator of early B-cell development, and it is dysregulated in various cancers [32–34]. Zhu et al. [35] found that PAK-5-mediated E47 phosphorylation promotes EMT, and we found that E2A inhibited EMT in a YAP-dependent manner [24]; this was an intriguing finding. The explanation for this observation may be that E47 participates in CRC cell progression via various pathways; more research is needed to elucidate the various roles of E2A in CRC cells. To clarify the correlation between E2A expression and progression-free survival in CRC patients, we validated E2A as a prognostic factor in 216 CRC patients. The reverse correlation between E2A and Lgr5 expression in CRC tissues gave us a clue for further research.
To identify the influence of E2A on tumor-initiating ability, we performed sphere- formation assays, finding that E2A decreased the ability of CRC cells to form spheres. Lgr5, a seven-transmembrane protein of the class A rhodopsin-like family of G protein-coupled receptors, is a stem-cell marker in intestinal cells. Lgr5+ cells divide every 24 h, generating rapidly proliferative progenitors that fill the pocket-like crypts [36, 37]. It has been reported that stem cell/progenitor hierarchies are maintained in CRC tissue and that LGR5 is a cancer stem-cell marker [38]. Consistent with results of the sphere-formation assay, we found that E2A inhibited expression of Lgr5 in Caco-2 cells and silenced up-regulated E2A expression of Lgr5 in SW480 cells. To this end, we documented that E2A participated in regulation of tumor-initiating capacity. In our previous study [24], inhibition of E2A expression in CRC cells resulted in overexpression of β-catenin, and immunofluorescence analysis showed that the increased β-catenin was not located on the cytomembrane, but in cell nuclei. To verify β-catenin overexpression in CRC cell nuclei, we extracted nuclear protein and measured it in western blot experiments. As expected, β-catenin accumulated in cell nuclei after E2A silencing. Corresponding with that observation, expression of TCF-1 and cyclin D1 was diminished after E12 and E47 overexpression. We affirmed that E2A exerts its suppressive function of the Wnt pathway by inhibiting β-catenin accumulation in CRC cell nuclei.
Forkhead box M1 (FoxM1) is one of the members of the Forkhead family that are conserved transcriptional regulators, which are defined by a common DNA-binding domain that is termed the Forkhead box [39]. FoxM1 is involved in cell proliferation and apoptosis, thus affecting the development of many organs [40]. FoxM1 is overexpressed in various human cancers, and it has been implicated in all major hallmarks of cancer, such as metastasis and chemoresistance [28, 41–43]. In glioma, Zhang et al. [28] demonstrated that β-catenin translocation to nuclei depends on its binding to FoxM1, which drives the formation of gliomas [27]. In this study, we documented that E2A suppresses the expression of FoxM1 at the mRNA and protein levels, and we demonstrated that E2A influences tumor-initiating ability in a FoxM1-dependent manner. In CRC cells, FoxM1 participated in β-catenin translocation to nuclei and activation of Wnt signaling, a finding that is consistent with the work of Zhang et al. [28] in gliomas. Considering that total β-catenin expression decreased in CRC cells after E2A overexpression and that FoxM1 regulated the translocation of β-catenin, more study is needed to clarify the mechanism of E2A regulating β-catenin expression in CRC cells; this will be emphasized in our future work. Nonetheless, in this study, we demonstrated that FoxM1 is a downstream target in mediating E2A’s function as a tumor suppressor gene in CRC.
Conclusion
The findings of this study established that E2A expression is associated with CRC cell tumor-initiating ability. By targeting FoxM1, E2A inhibits β-catenin in cell nuclei and suppresses the tumor-initiating capacity of CRC cells. Although the function of E2A in cancer has not been fully defined, we identified a new molecular target and mechanism of action of E2A in CRC. E2A has the potential to be a target for the prevention and therapy of CRC.
Additional files
Acknowledgments
We thank LetPub (www.letpub.com) for its linguistic assistance during the preparation of this manuscript.
Abbreviations
- bHLH
basic helix–loop–helix
- CRC
Colorectal cancer
- EMT
Epithelial-mesenchymal transition
- FoxM1
Forkhead box M1
- GAPDH
Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase
- HRP
Horseradish peroxidase
- shNC
shRNA-negative control
- shRNA
Short hairpin RNA
- SP1
Specificity protein 1
Authors’ contributions
HCZ carried out the experimental studies, drafted the graphs, performed the statistical analysis and wrote the paper. CLZ and HHL provided experimental technical support. DHZ and GHL contributed to the study design and manuscript revision, as well as provided funding for this study. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Funding
This work was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81602600).
Availability of data and materials
All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article and its Additional files 1 and 2.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
All animal procedures were performed with the approval of the Local Medical Experimental Animal Care Commission of the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University. The clinical research protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University. Two hundred sixteen surgical specimens of primary CRC tumors were obtained from The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, in 2015–2017, with written informed consent given by all patients before operation.
Consent for publication
We have obtained consent to publish this paper from all the participants of this study.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Contributor Information
Hongchao Zhao, Email: fcczhaohc@zzu.edu.cn.
Chunlin Zhao, Email: dr_zhaocl@sina.cn.
Haohao Li, Email: 349792199@qq.com.
Danhua Zhang, Phone: +86-371-67967246, Email: dr_zhangdh@sina.cn.
Guanghui Liu, Phone: +86-371-67967136, Email: erc_zhao@126.com.
References
- 1.Brenner H, Kloor M, Pox CP. Colorectal cancer. Lancet. 2014;383(9927):1490–1502. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61649-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2019. CA Cancer J Clin. 2019;69(1):7–34. doi: 10.3322/caac.21551. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Siegel R, Desantis C, Jemal A. Colorectal cancer statistics, 2014. CA Cancer J Clin. 2014;64(2):104–117. doi: 10.3322/caac.21220. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Chaffer CL, Weinberg RA. A perspective on cancer cell metastasis. Science. 2011;331(6024):1559–1564. doi: 10.1126/science.1203543. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Hanahan D, Weinberg RA. Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation. Cell. 2011;144(5):646–674. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.02.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Oskarsson T, Batlle E, Massague J. Metastatic stem cells: sources, niches, and vital pathways. Cell Stem Cell. 2014;14(3):306–321. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2014.02.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Gronroos E, Lopez-Garcia C. Tolerance of chromosomal instability in Cancer: mechanisms and therapeutic opportunities. Cancer Res. 2018;78(23):6529–6535. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-18-1958. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Zeuner A, Todaro M, Stassi G, De Maria R. Colorectal cancer stem cells: from the crypt to the clinic. Cell Stem Cell. 2014;15(6):692–705. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2014.11.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Todaro M, Gaggianesi M, Catalano V, Benfante A, Iovino F, Biffoni M, Apuzzo T, Sperduti I, Volpe S, Cocorullo G, et al. CD44v6 is a marker of constitutive and reprogrammed cancer stem cells driving colon cancer metastasis. Cell Stem Cell. 2014;14(3):342–356. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2014.01.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Auvinen P, Tammi R, Kosma VM, Sironen R, Soini Y, Mannermaa A, Tumelius R, Uljas E, Tammi M. Increased hyaluronan content and stromal cell CD44 associate with HER2 positivity and poor prognosis in human breast cancer. Int J Cancer. 2013;132(3):531–539. doi: 10.1002/ijc.27707. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Driessens G, Beck B, Caauwe A, Simons BD, Blanpain C. Defining the mode of tumour growth by clonal analysis. Nature. 2012;488(7412):527–530. doi: 10.1038/nature11344. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Mani SA, Guo W, Liao MJ, Eaton EN, Ayyanan A, Zhou AY, Brooks M, Reinhard F, Zhang CC, Shipitsin M, et al. The epithelial-mesenchymal transition generates cells with properties of stem cells. Cell. 2008;133(4):704–715. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2008.03.027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Gupta PB, Pastushenko I, Skibinski A, Blanpain C, Kuperwasser C. Phenotypic plasticity: driver of Cancer initiation, progression, and therapy resistance. Cell Stem Cell. 2019;24(1):65–78. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2018.11.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Chaffer CL, San Juan BP, Lim E, Weinberg RA. EMT, cell plasticity and metastasis. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2016;35(4):645–654. doi: 10.1007/s10555-016-9648-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Puisieux A, Pommier RM, Morel AP, Lavial F. Cellular pliancy and the multistep process of tumorigenesis. Cancer Cell. 2018;33(2):164–172. doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2018.01.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Dong W, Qin G, Shen R. Rab11-FIP2 promotes the metastasis of gastric cancer cells. Int J Cancer. 2016;138(7):1680–1688. doi: 10.1002/ijc.29899. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Schwitalla S, Fingerle AA, Cammareri P, Nebelsiek T, Goktuna SI, Ziegler PK, Canli O, Heijmans J, Huels DJ, Moreaux G, et al. Intestinal tumorigenesis initiated by dedifferentiation and acquisition of stem-cell-like properties. Cell. 2013;152(1–2):25–38. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.12.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Brabletz T, Kalluri R, Nieto MA, Weinberg RA. EMT in cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2018;18(2):128–134. doi: 10.1038/nrc.2017.118. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Murre C, McCaw PS, Baltimore D. A new DNA binding and dimerization motif in immunoglobulin enhancer binding, daughterless, MyoD, and myc proteins. Cell. 1989;56(5):777–783. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90682-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Chakraborty T, Brennan TJ, Li L, Edmondson D, Olson EN. Inefficient homooligomerization contributes to the dependence of myogenin on E2A products for efficient DNA binding. Mol Cell Biol. 1991;11(7):3633–3641. doi: 10.1128/mcb.11.7.3633. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Murre C, McCaw PS, Vaessin H, Caudy M, Jan LY, Jan YN, Cabrera CV, Buskin JN, Hauschka SD, Lassar AB, et al. Interactions between heterologous helix-loop-helix proteins generate complexes that bind specifically to a common DNA sequence. Cell. 1989;58(3):537–544. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90434-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Lassar AB, Buskin JN, Lockshon D, Davis RL, Apone S, Hauschka SD, Weintraub H. MyoD is a sequence-specific DNA binding protein requiring a region of myc homology to bind to the muscle creatine kinase enhancer. Cell. 1989;58(5):823–831. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90935-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Huang A, Zhao H, Quan Y, Jin R, Feng B, Zheng M. E2A predicts prognosis of colorectal cancer patients and regulates cancer cell growth by targeting miR-320a. PLoS One. 2014;9(1):e85201. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0085201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Zhao H, Huang A, Li P, Quan Y, Feng B, Chen X, Mao Z, Zhu Z, Zheng M. E2A suppresses invasion and migration by targeting YAP in colorectal cancer cells. J Transl Med. 2013;11:317. doi: 10.1186/1479-5876-11-317. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Zhao H, Dong T, Zhou H, Wang L, Huang A, Feng B, Quan Y, Jin R, Zhang W, Sun J, et al. miR-320a suppresses colorectal cancer progression by targeting Rac1. Carcinogenesis. 2014;35(4):886–895. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgt378. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Zhan T, Rindtorff N, Boutros M. Wnt signaling in cancer. Oncogene. 2017;36(11):1461–1473. doi: 10.1038/onc.2016.304. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Zhang N, Wei P, Gong A, Chiu WT, Lee HT, Colman H, Huang H, Xue J, Liu M, Wang Y, et al. FoxM1 promotes beta-catenin nuclear localization and controls Wnt target-gene expression and glioma tumorigenesis. Cancer Cell. 2011;20(4):427–442. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2011.08.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Song IS, Jeong YJ, Jeong SH, Heo HJ, Kim HK, Bae KB, Park YH, Kim SU, Kim JM, Kim N, et al. FOXM1-induced PRX3 regulates Stemness and survival of Colon Cancer cells via maintenance of mitochondrial function. Gastroenterology. 2015;149(4):1006–1016. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2015.06.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Gupta GP, Massague J. Cancer metastasis: building a framework. Cell. 2006;127(4):679–695. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.11.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Lambert AW, Pattabiraman DR, Weinberg RA. Emerging biological principles of metastasis. Cell. 2017;168(4):670–691. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.11.037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.de Sousa EMF, Vermeulen L. Wnt signaling in Cancer stem cell biology. Cancers. 2016;8(7). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 32.Engel I, Murre C. Ectopic expression of E47 or E12 promotes the death of E2A-deficient lymphomas. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999;96(3):996–1001. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.3.996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Cubillo E, Diaz-Lopez A, Cuevas EP, Moreno-Bueno G, Peinado H, Montes A, Santos V, Portillo F, Cano A. E47 and Id1 interplay in epithelial-mesenchymal transition. PLoS One. 2013;8(3):e59948. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0059948. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Hata F, Nishimori H, Yasoshima T, Tanaka H, Ohno K, Yanai Y, Ezoe E, Kamiguchi K, Isomura H, Denno R, et al. Profiling analysis of differential gene expression between hematogenous and peritoneal metastatic sublines of human pancreatic cancer using a DNA chip. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2004;23(3):513–520. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Zhu G, Li X, Guo B, Ke Q, Dong M, Li F. PAK5-mediated E47 phosphorylation promotes epithelial–mesenchymal transition and metastasis of colon cancer. Oncogene. 2015;35(15):1943–1954. doi: 10.1038/onc.2015.259. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Morgan RG, Mortensson E, Williams AC. Targeting LGR5 in colorectal Cancer: therapeutic gold or too plastic? Br J Cancer. 2018;118(11):1410–1418. doi: 10.1038/s41416-018-0118-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Koo BK, Clevers H. Stem cells marked by the R-spondin receptor LGR5. Gastroenterology. 2014;147(2):289–302. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2014.05.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Shimokawa M, Ohta Y, Nishikori S, Matano M, Takano A, Fujii M, Date S, Sugimoto S, Kanai T, Sato T. Visualization and targeting of LGR5(+) human colon cancer stem cells. Nature. 2017;545(7653):187–192. doi: 10.1038/nature22081. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Laoukili J, Stahl M, Medema RH. FoxM1: at the crossroads of ageing and cancer. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2007;1775(1):92–102. doi: 10.1016/j.bbcan.2006.08.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Katoh M, Katoh M. Human FOX gene family (review) Int J Oncol. 2004;25(5):1495–1500. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Raychaudhuri P, Park HJ. FoxM1: a master regulator of tumor metastasis. Cancer Res. 2011;71(13):4329–4333. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-11-0640. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Zhang X, Zhang L, Du Y, Zheng H, Zhang P, Sun Y, Wang Y, Chen J, Ding P, Wang N, et al. A novel FOXM1 isoform, FOXM1D, promotes epithelial-mesenchymal transition and metastasis through ROCKs activation in colorectal cancer. Oncogene. 2017;36(6):807–819. doi: 10.1038/onc.2016.249. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Gartel AL. FOXM1 in Cancer: interactions and vulnerabilities. Cancer Res. 2017;77(12):3135–3139. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-16-3566. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article and its Additional files 1 and 2.