Skip to main content
Bulletin of the World Health Organization logoLink to Bulletin of the World Health Organization
. 2018 May 14;97(7):450–459. doi: 10.2471/BLT.18.220566

Modelling impacts of food industry co-regulation on noncommunicable disease mortality, Portugal

Modélisation des impacts de la coréglementation de l'industrie alimentaire sur la mortalité due à des maladies non transmissibles au Portugal

Modelización de los impactos de la corregulación en la industria alimentaria sobre la mortalidad por enfermedades no transmisibles, Portugal

وضع نماذج توضح آثار التنظيم المشترك لصناعة الأغذية على وفيات الأمراض غير المعدية، البرتغال

葡萄牙食品工业共同监管对非传染性疾病死亡率的影响建模

Моделирование воздействия совместного регулирования в пищевой промышленности на смертность от неинфекционных заболеваний в Португалии

Francisco Goiana-da-Silva a, David Cruz-e-Silva b, Luke Allen c, Maria João Gregório d, Milton Severo e, Paulo Jorge Nogueira f, Alexandre Morais Nunes g, Pedro Graça d, Carla Lopes e, Marisa Miraldo h, João Breda i, Kremlin Wickramasinghe i, Ara Darzi j, Fernando Araújo k, Bente Mikkelsen l
PMCID: PMC6593340  PMID: 31258214

Abstract

Objective

To model the reduction in premature deaths attributed to noncommunicable diseases if targets for reformulation of processed food agreed between the Portuguese health ministry and the food industry were met.

Methods

The 2015 co-regulation agreement sets voluntary targets for reducing sugar, salt and trans-fatty acids in a range of products by 2021. We obtained government data on dietary intake in 2015–2016 and on population structure and deaths from four major noncommunicable diseases over 1990–2016. We used the Preventable Risk Integrated ModEl tool to estimate the deaths averted if reformulation targets were met in full. We projected future trends in noncommunicable disease deaths using regression modelling and assessed whether Portugal was on track to reduce baseline premature deaths from noncommunicable diseases in the year 2010 by 25% by 2025, and by 30% before 2030.

Findings

If reformulation targets were met, we projected reductions in intake in 2015–2016 for salt from 7.6 g/day to 7.1 g/day; in total energy from 1911 kcal/day to 1897 kcal/day due to reduced sugar intake; and in total fat (% total energy) from 30.4% to 30.3% due to reduced trans-fat intake. This consumption profile would result in 248 fewer premature noncommunicable disease deaths (95% CI: 178 to 318) in 2016. We projected that full implementation of the industry agreement would reduce the risk of premature death from 11.0% in 2016 to 10.7% by 2021.

Conclusion

The co-regulation agreement could save lives and reduce the risk of premature death in Portugal. Nevertheless, the projected impact on mortality was insufficient to meet international targets.

Introduction

In 2017, 88% (96 587) of 109 758 deaths in the Portuguese population of 10 291 027 were attributed to noncommunicable diseases.1 Portugal has committed to the United Nations sustainable development goal (SDG) target 3.4 to reduce premature mortality from noncommunicable diseases by one third by 2030 and the voluntary target to reduce these deaths by one quarter by 2025 from the baseline year 2010. To date, there have been no efforts to evaluate Portugal’s performance against these targets.24

Dietary risk factors are the leading preventable cause of noncommunicable diseases morbidity and mortality in Portugal.1,2 In response to the increasing prevalence of noncommunicable diseases the government introduced the National Programme for the Promotion of Healthy Eating in 2012.5,6 According to national data, the mean daily intake of free sugars in 2015–2016 was 35 g/day and about 24% (2 600 00) of the population exceeded the World Health Organization (WHO) recommended limits for free-sugar consumption. Non-adherence to this recommendation was more prevalent among children (48.4%; 380 000) and adolescents (48.7%; 422 000). For salt intake, 76.4% (8 283 000) of the population exceed the WHO recommended upper limits for daily sodium consumption. Encouragingly, trans-fatty acids (TFAs) intake constituted more than 1% of the total energy intake for only 0.4% (43 000) of the population.4

In 2017, Portugal introduced a consumption tax on sugar-sweetened beverages. The tax was set at euro (€) 8.22 per hectolitre of finished product for drinks with < 80 g sugar/L, and €16.46 for finished products with > 80 g/L sugar.7 Preliminary results from the first year of the tax implementation in 2017 showed that the mean energy content of sugar-sweetened beverages fell by 11% (from 30.92 kcal per 100 mL to 27.45 kcal per 100 mL). Sales of these drinks have decreased by almost 7% (from 538 million litres in 2016 to 503 million litres in 2017).7 Inspired by the success of the tax,8 the government proposed a salt tax to be levied on processed foods. The Portuguese parliament rejected this proposal and recommended instead introducing a co-regulation agreement with the food industry, whereby the government defines food reformulation targets and agrees a follow-up and accountability process with industry. If the targets are not met, stronger measures to promote reformulation, such as taxation, shall be implemented by the government. Such agreements have been adopted by several other countries.915

The agreement, drafted by the Portuguese health ministry, included reformulation targets and public accountability guidelines on all processed foods high in salt, sugar and TFAs.16 Guidelines were based on the recommendations of the European Commission’s High-Level Group on Nutrition and Physical Activity1719 and an analysis of the consumption patterns of the population.20,21 A consensus was reached among different stakeholders (the Portuguese nutrition association, nutritionist college and consumer protection association) on several food categories that should be reformulated. Defining the targets for the year 2021 would follow a baseline assessment in December 2017 of the nutritional content of processed food products representing at least 80% of the market share. Building on a consultation with the relevant experts, researchers, health professionals and representatives from the food and health sectors, the health ministry established annual milestones as well as a final reformulation target for each food sector (Table 1). The values were derived from the experience of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and recommendations from the High Level Group on Nutrition and Physical Activity of the European Commission11,22 and the World Health Organization (WHO).23 The reduction targets were 16% for salt, 20% for sugar and a limit of 2 g TFAs per 100 g of fat in margarines and shortening by 2021. The Portuguese government proposed additional targets for reducing salt in bread by 30% by 2021, corresponding to a maximum level of 1 g salt per 100 g of bread, and a limit of 1 g TFAs per 100 g of fat in pastry, by 2021.

Table 1. Preliminary objectives of the 2015 co-regulation agreement between the Portuguese government and the food industry for reducing sugar, salt and trans-fatty acids in processed food.

Nutrient Food products to reformulate Nutrient reduction target by year Total reduction by 2021
2019 2020 2021
Sugar Breakfast cereals; cookies and biscuits; chocolate milk; yogurt; soft drinks; fruit juice 5% 7% 8% 20%
Salt Bread (toast); breakfast cereals; cheese; cookies and biscuits; potato chips and other snacks; processed meats (ham); ready-to-eat soups 4% 5% 7% 16%
Bread 10% (1.2 g salt per 100 g bread) 10% (1.1 g salt per 100 g bread) 10% (1.0 g salt per 100 g bread) 30%
Trans-fatty acids Cookies and biscuits; fat spreads < 2 g trans fatty acids per 100 g of fat
Pastries < 2 g trans fatty acids per 100 g of fat
< 1 g trans fatty acids per 100 g of fat

Note: All percentage reductions are based on baseline levels from December 2017.

We modelled the reduction in premature mortality associated with noncommunicable diseases that would be expected if the Portuguese government’s co-regulation agreement with the food industry were established and the preliminary targets for food reformulation were met in full. We also aimed to analyse whether Portugal is on track to meet SDG targets to reduce premature mortality from noncommunicable diseases by 25% by 2025 and 33% by 2030.

Methods

Study design

In this modelling study carried out in May 2018, we used data on dietary intake, noncommunicable disease mortality and demographic data from 2016 to project how many lives could be saved in the same year if the industry co-agreement targets were met in full. We also modelled the trends in mortality from noncommunicable diseases in Portugal from 1990 to 2030 and what impact food reformulation would have on mortality trends.

Data sources

We used population data on food consumption for those aged 15–84 years, obtained from the Portuguese National Food, Nutrition and Physical Activity Survey conducted from October 2015 to September 2016.4 The survey collected nationwide and regional data on dietary habits, physical activity and anthropometrics from a representative sample of the Portuguese general population aged between 3 months and 84 years.24 Participants were selected from the national health registry by multistage sampling and 5811 individuals completed food consumption interviews, assessed by 24-hour recall.25

The Portuguese directorate general of health provided data for the years 1990–2016 on the age (5-year age bands) and sex distribution of the population and the annual numbers of deaths attributed to four major noncommunicable diseases. The ministry codes deaths attributed to noncommunicable diseases using the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, 10th revision (ICD-10), as follows: circulatory system diseases (codes I00–I99); diabetes (E10–E14); malignant neoplasms (C00–C97); and chronic respiratory diseases (J30–J98).

Data analysis

Modelling changes in nutrient consumption

We used the Electronic Assessment Tool for 24 hours recall (eAT24) software25 to convert food consumption data to intake of total energy (kcal/day), sodium (g/day) and fat (% of total fat/day). We then used the Statistical Program to Assess Dietary Exposure software (Dutch National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, Netherlands) to estimate the population’s usual intake of nutrients, removing intra-individual variability.26

We used the following formula to calculate the projected daily dietary intakes of nutrients if the co-regulation agreement targets were achieved in full. The formula combined consumption data from the 2015–2016 national survey with the nutrient concentration in the industry co-regulation agreement (cf ):

graphic file with name BLT.18.220566-M1.jpg (1)

where yid corresponds to the total energy, sodium or percentage of fat of individual i at day d and xidf corresponds the consumption of individual i at day d of food item f. Taking the 2015–2016 levels of consumption of each food as the baseline, we predicted the intakes of total energy, sodium and fat by the population using the updated concentrations of nutrients after reformulation.

Modelling changes in premature mortality

To model reductions in premature noncommunicable disease deaths (that is deaths at ages 30–69 years), we used the Preventable Risk Integrated ModEl, Nov. 2017 version, an openly available statistical noncommunicable disease modelling tool.27 The tool is currently being adopted by WHO Europe to help Member States estimate the impacts of changes in nutrition policy and hence prioritize noncommunicable disease policy options. Users input baseline data on mortality rates, population structure and behavioural risk factors (in this case, nutritional intake), along with a counterfactual scenario. The model predicts changes in mortality for any of 24 noncommunicable diseases, based on findings from international meta-analyses.27 As the modelling tool is cross-sectional, we could only compare a historical scenario (the population mortality rates and dietary consumption in 2016) with a counterfactual scenario (where the population’s consumption of salt, sugar and TFA was reduced) and calculate the expected number of deaths that would be observed in the same year.

The output of our analysis was the number of deaths that would have been averted in 2016 had the industry co-regulation targets been met in full. In line with the targets listed in Table 1, we modelled population sugar consumption reduced by 20%, salt consumption reduced by 16% (30% for bread), and complete elimination of trans-fats (which corresponds to achieving the targets previously identified). To model the impact of trans-fat reduction we calculated the percentage of total energy constituted by total fats. We reduced the calorie content of the sugar-related foods in Table 1 by 20% to model the impact of sugar reduction. We used Monte Carlo simulation to generate 95% confidence intervals (CI) around point estimates of numbers of deaths averted. The Monte Carlo analysis used uncertainty parameters based on the associations between dietary risk factors and disease outcomes, as described in the literature.27

To model the change in risk of premature noncommunicable disease mortality from 1990–2016, we used linear projections to forecast future probability of death. These projections were based on estimates from weighted and non-weighted exponential and linear regressions models to project premature noncommunicable disease mortality to 2030. Weights were exponentially distributed and calculated to be inverse to time (i.e. more recent data was given a heavier weighting than older data). We optimized the weights to have minimum distance between the projections and the two most recent data points. To assess how the co-regulation agreement would impact Portugal’s trajectory we re-ran the projection with the reduced noncommunicable disease deaths that were calculated by the Preventable Risk Integrated ModEl.

Results

Table 2 presents baseline data for mean intakes of salt, energy and fat derived from the 2016 Portuguese National Food, Nutrition and Physical Activity Survey, along with the projected values for 2016 if the food reformulation targets were met in full. We predicted reductions in mean intakes of salt from 7.6 g/day (standard deviation, SD: 2.3) to 7.1 g/day (SD: 2.2); total energy from 1911 kcal/day to 1897 kcal/day; and total fat as a percentage of total energy per day from 30.4% (SD: 4.8) to 30.3% (SD: 4.8).

Table 2. Projected daily intake of salt, total energy and total fat by age and sex in Portugal in 2021 if a co-regulation agreement on the nutrient content of processed food were implemented.

Age and sex Sample, no. Population, no. Mean (SD) salt intake, g/day Meana total energy intake, kcal/day Mean (SD) total fat intake, % total energy/day
Baseline Projected Baseline Projected Baseline Projected
Total 4 067 9 494 698 7.6 (2.3) 7.1 (2.2) 1 911 1 897 30.4 (4.8) 30.3 (4.8)
Male, years
15–19 152 292 936 8.5 (2.4) 8.0 (2.2) 2 355 2 325 30.2 (4.4) 29.8 (4.4)
20–24 125 413 473 8.9 (2.4) 8.3 (2.3) 2 429 2 400 30.0 (4.4) 29.8 (4.4)
25–29 115 258 286 9.1 (2.5) 8.5 (2.3) 2 459 2 431 29.8 (4.4) 29.7 (4.4)
30–34 139 321 783 9.2 (2.5) 8.6 (2.4) 2 456 2 430 29.7 (4.4) 29.6 (4.4)
35–39 157 338 404 9.3 (2.5) 8.7 (2.4) 2 423 2 401 29.4 (4.4) 29.4 (4.4)
40–44 187 503 264 9.3 (2.5) 8.7 (2.4) 2 380 2 360 29.1 (4.4) 29.2 (4.4)
45–49 155 379 035 9.3 (2.5) 8.6 (2.4) 2 331 2 313 28.9 (4.4) 29.0 (4.4)
50–54 166 446 686 9.1 (2.5) 8.5 (2.3) 2 258 2 243 28.5 (4.4) 28.6 (4.4)
55–59 173 403 022 9.0 (2.4) 8.3 (2.3) 2 185 2 174 28.1 (4.4) 28.3 (4.4)
60–64 154 396 197 8.7 (2.4) 8.1 (2.3) 2 114 2 106 27.8 (4.4) 27.8 (4.4)
65–69 169 390 285 8.4 (2.4) 7.8 (2.2) 2 027 2 021 27.3 (4.4) 27.3 (4.3)
70–74 93 188 581 8.1 (2.4) 7.5 (2.1) 1 952 1 949 26.9 (4.4) 26.8 (4.3)
75–79 80 145 870 7.7 (2.2) 7.0 (2.0) 1 859 1 859 26.4 (4.3) 26.0 (4.3)
80–84 50 119 865 7.2 (2.1) 6.6 (2.0) 1 775 1 777 25.9 (4.3) 25.3 (4.3)
85+b NA NA 7.2 (2.1) 6.6 (2.0) 1 775 1 777 25.9 (4.3) 25.3 (4.3)
All ages 1915 4 597 687 8.9 (2.5) 8.2 (2.3) 2 241 2 223 28.8 (4.5) 28.7 (4.5)
Female, years
15–19 183 270 998 6.8 (1.8) 6.4 (1.7) 1 803 1 784 31.8 (4.9) 31.8 (4.9)
20–24 147 348 323 6.8 (1.8) 6.4 (1.7) 1 774 1 756 32.0 (5.0) 31.9 (4.9)
25–29 143 278 977 6.7 (1.8) 6.4 (1.7) 1 741 1 725 32.0 (5.0) 31.9 (4.9)
30–34 182 368 473 6.6 (1.8) 6.3 (1.7) 1 705 1 690 31.9 (4.9) 31.8 (4.9)
35–39 195 434 452 6.6 (1.8) 6.2 (1.7) 1 674 1 660 31.8 (5.0) 31.7 (4.9)
40–44 248 574 407 6.5 (1.8) 6.1 (1.7) 1 643 1 631 31.6 (5.0) 31.5 (4.9)
45–49 190 422 300 6.4 (1.7) 6.0 (1.6) 1 612 1 601 31.3 (4.9) 31.3 (4.9)
50–54 204 493 009 6.4 (1.7) 5.9 (1.6) 1 586 1 576 31.1 (4.9) 31.0 (4.9)
55–59 172 343 994 6.3 (1.7) 5.8 (1.6) 1 558 1 549 30.7 (4.9) 30.7 (4.9)
60–64 130 293 724 6.2 (1.7) 5.7 (1.6) 1 534 1 527 30.4 (4.9) 30.3 (4.9)
65–69 142 481 403 6.2 (1.7) 5.6 (1.6) 1 509 1 502 29.9 (4.9) 29.9 (4.9)
70–74 105 259 438 6.1 (1.6) 5.5 (1.5) 1 489 1 483 29.5 (4.9) 29.5 (4.9)
75–79 73 193 218 6.0 (1.7) 5.4 (1.5) 1 469 1 463 29.1 (4.8) 29.1 (4.9)
80–84 38 134 295 6.0 (1.6) 5.3 (1.5) 1 447 1 442 28.5 (4.9) 28.6 (4.8)
85+b NA NA 6.0 (1.6) 5.3 (1.5) 1 447 1 442 28.5 (4.9) 28.6 (4.8)
All ages 2 152 4 897 011 6.4 (1.8) 6.0 (1.7) 1 636 1 623 31.1 (5.0) 31.0 (5.0)

NA: not applicable; SD: standard deviation.

a The model which we used to estimate deaths averted due to food reformation does not use SD of mean total energy intake in the calculations.

b For the age group 85+ years we used the same estimates from the previous age group (80–84 years) as the Portuguese National Food, Nutrition and Physical Activity survey only included the population up to 84 years of age.

Notes: The proposed co-regulation agreement between the Portuguese health ministry and the food industry sets targets of reducing sugar by 20%, salt content by 16% (30% for bread) and < 2 g trans-fatty acids per 100 g of fat in a range of products by 2021. The projected (counterfactual) values assumed that the co-regulation targets set by the ministry were fully met. We weighted dietary estimates according to the complex sampling design, considering stratification by the seven Portuguese geographical regions and cluster effect for the selected primary health-care units.25

Sources: We obtained baseline data on dietary consumption (24-hour recall) from the Portuguese National Food, Nutrition and Physical Activity Survey in 2015–2016.24 Data on age and sex distribution of the population were provided by the Portuguese directorate general of health.

Table 3 shows the projected mean number of noncommunicable disease deaths averted in Portugal in 2016 if targets for reduction of sugar, salt and trans-fats intake by the population were achieved, by age, sex, disease and risk factor. Most of deaths averted would occur in those older than 75 years. Reductions in cardiovascular deaths would greatly outnumber deaths averted from cancer or diabetes.

Table 3. Projected mean number of noncommunicable disease deaths averted in Portugal in 2016 if targets for reduction of sugar, salt and trans-fats intake by the population were achieved, by age, sex, disease and behavioural risk factor.

Variable Population aged > 15 years, no. No. of deaths averted or delayed
2.5th percentile Mean 97.5th percentile
Total 8 873 828 494 800 1106
By age and sex
Age < 75 years 7 819 807 178 248 318
Males 4 148 778 138 272 409
Females 4 725 050 355 527 701
Males aged < 75 years 3 746 359 114 164 215
Females aged < 75 years 4 073 449 63 84 104
By disease
All cardiovascular disease 8 873 828 384 693 999
  Coronary heart disease 8 873 828 92 156 221
  Stroke 8 873 828 123 233 341
  Heart failure 8 873 828 82 144 210
  Aortic aneurysm 8 873 828 3 7 11
  Pulmonary embolism 8 873 828 2 6 13
  Rheumatic heart disease 8 873 828 0 1 3
  Hypertensive disease 8 873 828 77 145 213
Diabetes 8 873 828 40 57 70
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 8 873 828 0 0 0
Cancer 8 873 828 18 24 30
By risk factor
Diet (excluding obesity) 8 873 828 224 530 840
Diet (including obesity) 8 873 828 494 800 1106
Fruit and vegetables 8 873 828 0 0 0
Fibre 8 873 828 0 0 0
Fats 8 873 828 −4 −1 2
Salt 8 873 828 224 531 841
Physical activity (excluding obesity) 8 873 828 0 0 0
Physical activity (including obesity) 8 873 828 239 274 305
Obesity 8 873 828 239 274 305
Alcohol consumption 8 873 828 0 0 0
Smoking 8 873 828 0 0 0

Notes: The proposed co-regulation agreement between the Portuguese health ministry and the food industry sets targets of reducing sugar by 20%, salt content by 16% (30% for bread) and < 2 g trans-fatty acids per 100 g of fat in a range of products by 2021. We modelled the reduction in premature mortality attributed to noncommunicable diseases that would be observed if the co-regulation targets set by the health ministry were fully met. The population of Portugal in 2016 was 10 309 537. We included all individuals older than 15 years (8 873 828 people). The results were obtained from the Monte Carlo analysis (10 000 simulations).

Sources: We obtained baseline data on dietary habits (24-hour recall) from the Portuguese National Food, Nutrition and Physical Activity Survey in 2015–2016.24 Baseline data on mortality and the age and sex distribution of the population were provided by the Portuguese directorate general of health.

We estimated that the reductions in nutrient intakes, if the food reformulation targets were met in full, would avert a total of 798 deaths (95% CI: 483 to 1107) attributed to noncommunicable diseases in 2016 (Table 4). The greatest reduction was for cardiovascular disease, accounting for 692 deaths averted (95% CI: 377 to 999). Achieving the industry targets for food reformulation would avert more deaths among women (526; 95% CI: 348 to 698) than men (272; 95% CI: 132 to 409). Reduction in salt intake made the biggest contribution, accounting for 610 deaths averted (95% CI: 215 to 840) compared with 261 deaths averted (95% CI: 238 to 305) due to reduction of sugar intake and none due to elimination of trans-fat. Of the total noncommunicable disease deaths averted in 2016, 248 (95% CI: 178‒318) were premature deaths.

Table 4. Projected number of noncommunicable disease deaths averted in Portugal in 2016 if targets for reduction of sugar, salt and trans-fats intake by the population were achieved, by sex, disease and nutrient.

Variable No. of deaths
All deaths attributed to noncommunicable diseasesa
Premature deaths attributed to noncommunicable diseasesb
Baseline Projected Averted (95% CI) Baseline Projected Averted (95% CI)
Total 54 745 53 947 798 (483 to 1 107) 17 633 17 386 248 (178 to 318)
By sex
Male 27 699 27 427 272 (132 to 409) 11 744 11 580 164 (113 to 214)
Female 26 424 25 898 526 (348 to 698) 5 899 5 815 84 (63 to 104)
By disease
Cardiovascular disease 11 732 11 040 692 (377 to 999) 2 085 1 899 186 (117 to 256)
Diabetes 4 280 4 219 61 (40 to 71) 944 920 24 (19 to 29)
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 2 789 2 789 0 (0 to 0) 518 518 0 (0 to 0)
Cancer 2 335 2 310 25 (18 to 31)  1 162 1 147 15 (10 to 19)
By nutrientc
Salt reduction NA NA 610 (215 to 840) NA NA NA
Sugar reduction NA NA 261 (238 to 305) NA NA NA
Trans-fatty acid elimination NA NA 0 (0 to 0) NA NA NA

CI: confidence interval; NA: not applicable.

a We modelled deaths due to four major noncommunicable diseases: circulatory system diseases, diabetes, malignant neoplasms and chronic respiratory diseases.

b Premature deaths were those occurring in 30–69 year olds.

c We estimated deaths related to sugar and trans-fats using change in energy intake. Due to the design of the Preventable Risk Integrated ModEl tool we were unable to obtain estimates of the total number of baseline or counterfactual deaths attributable to the individual nutrients.

Notes: The proposed co-regulation agreement between the Portuguese health ministry and the food industry sets targets of reducing sugar by 20%, salt content by 16% (30% for bread) and < 2 g trans-fatty acids per 100 g of fat in a range of products by 2021. We modelled the reduction in premature mortality attributed to noncommunicable diseases that would be observed if the co-regulation targets set by the health ministry were fully met. The population of Portugal in 2016 was 10 309 537. We included all individuals older than 15 years (8 873 828 people).

Sources: We obtained baseline data on dietary habits (24-hour recall) from the Portuguese National Food, Nutrition and Physical Activity Survey in 2015–2016.24 Baseline data on mortality and the age and sex distribution of the population were provided by the Portuguese directorate general of health.

Fig. 1 shows that the risk of premature noncommunicable disease death fell from nearly 17.5% to 11.1% between 1990–2010, but remained at 11.1% up to 2016. The SDG target of reducing deaths is 8.3% by 2025 and 7.8% by 2030. The weighted projection estimates a risk (or probability) of death of 11.0% for both 2025 and 2030 based on current trends. Our model shows that the 248 averted premature deaths achieved by fully meeting the food reformulation targets in 2016 would reduce the risk of death to 10.7%. Neither the current weighted trend nor the new projection (assuming that industry targets were met) was set to meet the SDG targets for years 2025 or 2030. The unweighted projection line was the only one crossing the thresholds by the agreed deadlines. WHO data from recent years28 suggested that there would be no further reduction in the risk of premature noncommunicable disease mortality given current trends.

Fig. 1.

Historic and projected risk of premature noncommunicable disease deaths in Portugal compared with sustainable development goal targets for 2025 and 2030

Notes: The chart line shows the actual data for probability of premature noncommunicable disease mortality from 1990 to 2016 (latest available data). The 2010 risk is the baseline from which the 2025 and 2030 targets are calculated. The unweighted regression line suggests that Portugal will meet both targets before 2025. However, the weighted projection that accords more value to recent data suggests that the risk of premature mortality has stopped declining and will increase towards the 2010 level over the coming 15 years. If the industry co-regulation targets were met in full in the year 2016 then the risk would be lower but, even with these reductions in deaths, the trend will still not reach the 2025 or the 2030 targets.

Source: We obtained baseline data on all-cause mortality and mortality from major noncommunicable diseases (circulatory system diseases, diabetes, malignant neoplasms and chronic respiratory diseases) and the age and sex distribution of the population from the Portuguese directorate general of health. We modelled the change in risk of premature noncommunicable disease mortality from 1990–2016 using linear regression, making projections for the upcoming years. Using the number of estimated averted deaths using the Preventable Risk Integrated ModEl tool, the current population structure (2017), and mortality distribution per causes of deaths and 5-year age groups (2016). We estimated the final unconditional probability of death for 2021 using the life-table method.43

Fig. 1

Discussion

Our model predicted that eliminating trans-fats and reducing salt and sugar consumption in the Portuguese population, in line with the food industry co-agreement targets, would have averted 798 deaths due to noncommunicable diseases in 2016, of which 248 were premature. These deaths averted are not sufficient to significantly alter the trends in premature mortality in Portugal or achieve the 2025 and 2030 SDG targets for reduction of premature noncommunicable disease mortality. The Global Burden of Diseases project of the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation also publishes mortality projections,29 considering three scenarios (reference, better and worse), although not exactly for the same age groups as ours. Their projected worse scenario is similar to our current weighted linear regression projection, while the reference and better scenarios both lie between our weighted and unweighted linear regression projections. Global Burden of Diseases forecast scenarios do not vary much up to 2020 and it is only after that point in time that there is a marked difference in scenarios. How the Institute generates their better scenario is unclear, but the interventions we analysed (reformulation targets for sugar, salt and trans-fats) may be just one of many potential public health interventions being implemented that can help move current trends to the best scenarios.

Several countries have published the results of voluntary industry agreements to promote food reformulation.915 The majority of these studies evaluated the impact of reformulation on nutrient intake rather than on health outcomes. An evaluation of the Australian Food and Health Dialogue targets showed modest reductions in the sodium content of bread (9%; from 454 to 415 mg/100 g), breakfast cereals (25%; from 316 to 237 mg/100 g) and processed meats (8%; from 1215 to 1114 mg/100 g) between 2010 and 2013.14 Evaluation studies in the United Kingdom also showed that these strategies might be effective in achieving important reductions in the salt content of food. Reductions of 57% (from 0.95 to 0.41 g/100 g) and of 25% (from 0.77 to 0.58 g/100 g) in the salt content of breakfast cereals and sweet biscuits, respectively, were observed between 2004 and 2011.10

In terms of health outcomes, interventions focused on salt reduction in food tend to perform favourably.15,3033 Estimation of the potential health gains of the Australian food reformulation programme to reduce the salt content in processed foods, implemented since 1989, has shown the potential to avert a total of 5300 disability-adjusted life-years.20 A modelling study using data from the Framingham Heart Study in the United States of America suggested that a food reformulation programme to reduce sodium intake by 9.5% could increase quality-adjusted life-years by 2.1 million over current adult lifetimes.34 An Argentinian modelling study suggested that reducing sodium in processed meats, cheese and dairy products, soups, cereals, cookies, pizza and pasta by 5–15% could avert 19 000 deaths from all causes over a decade.35 Researchers have argued that packaged foods are the priority categories for salt reformulation.30 These findings are aligned with previous work suggesting that reformulation can achieve health gains. However, data from previous modelling studies suggests that mandatory approaches generate more health gain than voluntary agreements.20,30,32 A study in Australia has estimated that health gains from mandatory measures could be 20 times higher than voluntary interventions.20

Despite the importance of these data for implementation of healthy eating policies, our study is not without limitations. First, to generate weighted trend lines we used the same statistical approach that the Portuguese health ministry uses for routinely assessing mortality projections. However, the formula heavily discounts older data. As such, the weighted projection may have been overly-pessimistic. Nevertheless. this approach is the national standard that has been used in other national plans and publications.3638 There is a risk that the slowing rate of decline in noncommunicable disease deaths is an artefact. However, there are several reasons to believe that the rate of decline is slowing, due to stalled improvements in cancer and cardiovascular disease mortality39 and the impact of the Portuguese financial crisis in 2011–2014.

Second, the Preventable Risk Integrated ModEl is a cross-sectional model and its strengths and weaknesses are well documented.27 Our study fails to reflect major reductions in morbidity associated with reduced consumption of salt, sugar and trans-fats. For example, sugar reductions would impact childhood obesity or diabetes, but these gains were not captured in the analysis. Due to very low population intakes of trans-fats in Portugal,24 complete elimination of trans-fats in processed foods did not avert any deaths in our model. It is possible that deaths may have been averted, but that the modelling tool we used did not capture them. Our study only examined the impact of reformulation on mortality from the four major noncommunicable diseases and will therefore underestimate the true reduction in deaths. We also failed to capture reductions in noncommunicable disease morbidity and mortality that extend beyond 2030. These issues mean that the model underestimates the true population health impact. The modelling tool is not designed to directly model the impact of trans-fat changes, except through the changed in percentage of total energy from total fat. Again, this will lead to underestimates of deaths averted.

The biggest limitation of the modelling tool we used is that it provides an estimate of the number of deaths that would have been averted if the targets had been fully realized in one year (2016 in our study), rather than projecting how many lives would have been saved over the period of roll-out. It is likely that 248 premature deaths would be averted in every year where consumption of salt, sugar and trans-fats were reduced in line with the co-regulation targets, all other things being constant.

Finally, some of the baseline parameters used in this study are likely to underestimate true levels of consumption. We used data from the most recent national dietary survey using self-reported assessment. However, the gold standard for salt assessment is 24-hour urine excretion, as food consumption questionnaires tend to underestimate salt intake. To get a more accurate picture we recommend that the Portuguese health ministry uses 24-hour urine excretion values for monitoring and evaluation of the outcomes of the food reformulation agreement.

Policy implications

The Portuguese health ministry had attempted a salt-related co-regulation agreement in the past. However, due to the lack of objective evaluation tools there was no appropriate follow-up and therefore no evidence that effective reformulation of processed foods had taken place.40 Our model suggests that fully meeting the reformulation targets could avert approximately 250 deaths per year. This figure underestimates the true number of diet-related deaths that would be averted and does not capture the morbidity averted from dietary improvements. Due to their limited impact on premature mortality, we suggest that co-regulation agreements should form part of a broader package of diet policies. These policies might include food labelling, improving the public’s health literacy and environmental interventions, such as health-related food taxes, all of which have been shown to be more equitable and cost–effective than micro-level interventions.18,41,42

Portugal is currently not on track to reduce premature noncommunicable disease mortality by a quarter by 2025 or by one third by 2030. Fully achieving the industry reformulation targets is not likely to change this outcome. Our modelling study suggests that the Portuguese industry co-regulation agreement will save lives. However, the overall impact on risk of premature noncommunicable disease deaths is small.

Co-regulation agreements with the food industry, enabled by strong government leadership, with rigorous monitoring might be an effective strategy to change food environments, mitigate risk factors and improve health status. However, we argue that voluntary agreements are insufficient on their own and need to be accompanied by interventions to improve dietary consumption patterns and population health.

Acknowledgments

We thank Peter Scarborough, University of Oxford, United Kingdom. Other affiliations of the authors: FGS, Faculdade de Ciências da Saúde, Universidade da Beira Interior, Covilhã, Portugal; MJG, EpiDoC Unit, Chronic Diseases Research Center, NOVA Medical School, Lisbon, Portugal; CL and MS, Epidemiology Research Unit (EPIUnit), Institute of Public Health, University of Porto, Oporto, Portugal; PJN, Centro de Investigação em Saúde Pública, Escola Nacional de Saúde Pública, Lisbon Portugal.

Funding:

The WHO Regional Office for Europe and the Portuguese government funded this study.

Competing interests:

None declared.

References

  • 1.Global burden of disease study 2017. Results. Seattle: Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation; 2017. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Retrato da Saúde em Portugal. Lisboa: Ministério da Saúde; 2018. Portuguese. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Obesity and the economics of prevention: fit not fat. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development; 2010. Available from: http://www.oecd.org/els/health-systems/obesity-and-the-economics-of-prevention-789264084865-en.htm [cited 2018 May 21].
  • 4.Lopes C, Torres D, Oliveira A, Severo M, Alarcão V, Guiomar S, et al. National food, nutrition, and physical activity survey of the Portuguese general population. IAN-AF 2015-2016: Summary of results. Oporto: Universidade do Porto; 2017. Available from: http://www.ian-af.up.pt [cited 2018 Jul 05]. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 5.Programa nacional da promoção da alimentação saudável - orientações programáticas. Lisboa: Direção-Geral da Saúde; 2012. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Graça P, Gregório MJ. A construção do programa nacional para a promoção da alimentação saudável: aspectos conceptuais, linhas estratégicas e desafios iniciais. Revista Nutrícias. 2013;18:6–9. [Portuguese.] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Goiana-da-Silva F, Nunes A, Miraldo M, Bento A, Breda J, Araújo FF. Fiscalidade ao Serviço da Saúde Pública: A Experiência na Tributação das Bebidas Açucaradas em Portugal. Acta Med Port. 2018;31(4):191–5. 10.20344/amp.10222 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Goiana-da-Silva F, Cruz-E-Silva D, Gregório MJ, Miraldo M, Darzi A, Araújo F. The future of the sweetened beverages tax in Portugal. Lancet Public Health. 2018. December;3(12):e562. 10.1016/S2468-2667(18)30240-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Jones A, Magnusson R, Swinburn B, Webster J, Wood A, Sacks G, et al. Designing a Healthy Food Partnership: lessons from the Australian Food and Health Dialogue. BMC Public Health. 2016. July 27;16(1):651. 10.1186/s12889-016-3302-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.He FJ, Brinsden HC, MacGregor GA. Salt reduction in the United Kingdom: a successful experiment in public health. J Hum Hypertens. 2014. June;28(6):345–52. 10.1038/jhh.2013.105 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Sugar reduction: achieving the 20%. A technical report outlining progress to date. guidelines for industry. 2015 baseline levels in key foods and next steps. London: Public Health England; 2017. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Wyness LA, Butriss JL, Stanner SA. Reducing the population’s sodium intake: the UK Food Standards Agency’s salt reduction programme. Public Health Nutr. 2012. February;15(2):254–61. 10.1017/S1368980011000966 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Sodium initiatives [internet]. New York: New York City Health Department; 2018. Available from: https://www1.nyc.gov/site/doh/health/health-topics/national-salt-reduction-initiative.page [cited 2018 May 30].
  • 14.Trevena H, Neal B, Dunford E, Wu JH. An evaluation of the effects of the Australian Food and Health Dialogue targets on the sodium content of bread, breakfast cereals and processed meats. Nutrients. 2014. September 19;6(9):3802–17. 10.3390/nu6093802 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Chauliac M, Hercberg S. Changing the food environment: the French experience. Adv Nutr. 2012. July 1;3(4):605S–10S. 10.3945/an.112.001941 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Magnusson R, Reeve B. Food reformulation, responsive regulation, and “regulatory scaffolding”: strengthening performance of salt reduction Programs in Australia and the United Kingdom. Nutrients. 2015. June 30;7(7):5281–308. 10.3390/nu7075221 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.High Level Group on Nutrition and Physical Activity. EU framework for national salt initiatives. Brussels: European Commission; 2009. Available from: http://ec.europa.eu/health/archive/ph_determinants/life_style/nutrition/documents/national_salt_en.pdf [cited 2019 Apr 13].
  • 18.High Level Group on Nutrition and Physical Activity. EU Framework for National Initiatives on selected nutrients. annex II: added sugars. Brussels: European Commission; 2011. Available from: https://ec.europa.eu/health/sites/health/files/nutrition_physical_activity/docs/added_sugars_en.pdf [cited 2019 Apr 13].
  • 19.High Level Group on Nutrition and Physical Activity. EU Framework for National Initiatives on selected nutrients. Brussels: European Commission; 2011. Available from: https://ec.europa.eu/health//sites/health/files/nutrition_physical_activity/docs/euframework_national_nutrients_en.pdf [cited 2019 Apr 13].
  • 20.Cobiac LJT, Vos T, Veerman JL. Cost–effectiveness of interventions to reduce dietary salt intake. Heart. 2010. December;96(23):1920–5. 10.1136/hrt.2010.199240 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Casa S, Cruz R, Costa N, Graça P, Breda J. Trans-fatty acids in Portuguese food products. Copenhagen: World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe; 2016. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Salt reduction targets for 2017. London: Public Health England; 2017. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Eliminating trans fats in Europe. A policy brief. Copenhagen: World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe; 2015. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Lopes C, Torres D, Oliveira A, Severo M, Guiomar S, Alarcão V, et al. ; IAN-AF Consortium. National food, nutrition, and physical activity survey of the Portuguese general population (2015-2016): protocol for design and development. JMIR Res Protoc. 2018. February 15;7(2):e42. 10.2196/resprot.8990 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Lopes C, Torres D, Oliveira A, Severo M, Guiomar S, Alarcão V, et al. National Food, Nutrition and Physical Activity Survey of the Portuguese general population. EFSA supporting publication 2017:EN1341. Parma: European Food Safety Authority; 2017. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Dekkers AL, Verkaik-Kloosterman J, van Rossum CT, Ocké MC. SPADE, a new statistical program to estimate habitual dietary intake from multiple food sources and dietary supplements. J Nutr. 2014. December;144(12):2083–91. 10.3945/jn.114.191288 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Scarborough P, Harrington RA, Mizdrak A, Zhou LM, Doherty A. The preventable risk integrated ModEl and its use to estimate the health impact of public health policy scenarios. Scientifica (Cairo). 2014;2014:748750. 10.1155/2014/748750 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Silva da Costa A, Ribeiro da Silva C, Jakubowski E, Nogueira P. Noncommunicable diseases 2030: assessing Portugal’s progress towards the noncommunicable disease-related target of the sustainable developmental goals. Public Health Panorama. 2018. September;4(3):321–9. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.GBD foresight [internet]. Seattle: Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, University of Washington; 2018. Available from: https://vizhub.healthdata.org/gbd-foresight/ [cited 2018 Jun 19].
  • 30.Wilson N, Nghiem N, Eyles H, Mhurchu CN, Shields E, Cobiac LJ, et al. Modeling health gains and cost savings for ten dietary salt reduction targets. Nutr J. 2016. April 26;15(1):44. 10.1186/s12937-016-0161-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Nghiem N, Blakely T, Cobiac LJ, Pearson AL, Wilson N. Health and economic impacts of eight different dietary salt reduction interventions. PLoS One. 2015. April 24;10(4):e0123915. 10.1371/journal.pone.0123915 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Gillespie DO, Allen K, Guzman-Castillo M, Bandosz P, Moreira P, McGill R, et al. The health equity and effectiveness of policy options to reduce dietary salt intake in England: policy forecast. PLoS One. 2015. July 1;10(7):e0127927. 10.1371/journal.pone.0127927 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Nghiem N, Blakely T, Cobiac LJ, Cleghorn CL, Wilson N. The health gains and cost savings of dietary salt reduction interventions, with equity and age distributional aspects. BMC Public Health. 2016. May 23;16(1):423. 10.1186/s12889-016-3102-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Smith-Spangler CM, Juusola JL, Enns EA, Owens DK, Garber AM. Population strategies to decrease sodium intake and the burden of cardiovascular disease: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2010. April 20;152(8):481–7, W170-3. 10.7326/0003-4819-152-8-201004200-00212 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Konfino J, Mekonnen TA, Coxson PG, Ferrante D, Bibbins-Domingo K. Projected impact of a sodium consumption reduction initiative in Argentina: an analysis from the CVD policy model – Argentina. PLoS One. 2013. September 9;8(9):e73824. 10.1371/journal.pone.0073824 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.A saúde dos Portugueses. Lisboa: Direção-Geral da Saúde; 2016. [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Jakab Z. Reducing the burden of noncommunicable diseases in Europe. Public Health Panorama. 2018;4(3):374–5. [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Plano Nacional de Saúde em números. Lisboa: Direção-Geral da Saúde; 2015. [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Retrato da saúde. Lisboa: Ministério da Saúde; 2018. Available from: https://www.sns.gov.pt/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/RETRATO-DA-SAUDE_2018_compressed.pdf [cited 2018 Jun 19].
  • 40.Proposta de Estratégia para a redução do consumo de sal na população portuguesa através da modificação da disponibilidade da oferta. Lisboa: Direção-Geral da Saúde; 2015. Portuguese. Available from: https://www.dgs.pt/em-destaque/estrategias-para-a-reducao-de-sal-nos-produtos-alimentares-a-venda-em-portugal-pdf.aspx [cited 2018 Ju 10].
  • 41.Goiana-da-Silva F, Cruz-e-Silva D, Gregório MJ, Nunes AM, Graça P, Bento A, et al. Bringing government sectors together to address noncommunicable diseases – Portugal’s strategy. Public Health Panorama. 2018;4(3):426–34. [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Von Philipsborn P, Stratil JM, Burns J, Busert LK, Pfadenhauer LM, Polus S, et al. Environmental interventions to reduce the consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages and their effects on health. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;(7):CD012292 10.1002/14651858.CD012292 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Noncommunicable diseases global monitoring framework: indicator definitions and specifications [internet] Geneva: World Health Organization; 2013. Available from: http://www.who.int/nmh/ncd-tools/indicators/GMF_Indicator_Definitions_FinalNOV2014.pdf?ua=1 [cited 2018 Mar 17].

Articles from Bulletin of the World Health Organization are provided here courtesy of World Health Organization

RESOURCES