Abstract
Muscle BOLD contrast at 7T is greater in magnitude and potentially more influenced by extravascular BOLD mechanisms than it is at lower field strengths. Muscle BOLD-imaging of muscle contractions at 7T could, therefore, provide greater or different contrast than at 3T. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of using BOLD imaging at 7T to assess the physiological responses to in vivo muscle contractions. Thirteen subjects (4 females) performed a series of isometric contractions of the calf muscles while being scanned in a Philips Achieva 7T human imager. Following 2 s maximal isometric plantarflexion contractions, BOLD signal transients ranging from 0.3–7.0% of the pre-contraction signal intensity were observed in the soleus muscle. We observed considerable inter-subject variability in both the magnitude and time course of the muscle BOLD signal. A subset of subjects (n=7) repeated the contraction protocol at two different repetition times (TR’s; 1000 and 2500 ms) to determine the potential of T1-related inflow effects on the magnitude of the post-contractile BOLD response. Consistent with previous reports, there was no difference in the magnitude of the responses for the two TR’s (3.8±0.9 vs. 4.0±0.6% for TR=1000 and 2500 ms, respectively; mean±standard error). These results demonstrate that studies of the muscle BOLD responses to contractions are feasible at 7T. Compared to studies at lower field strengths, post-contractile 7T muscle BOLD contrast may afford greater insight into microvascular function and dysfunction.
Keywords: magnetic resonance imaging, skeletal muscle functional MRI, hyperemia
INTRODUCTION
The post-contractile muscle blood oxygenation-level dependent (BOLD) response has been described primarily as a small positive change in T2*- weighted signal intensity (SI) following a brief isometric contraction (1). The physiologic influences on this response include blood volume, blood flow, and muscle oxygen consumption. These processes impact the magnitude and time course of the response (2). Post-contractile BOLD contrast has been used to characterize skeletal muscle function in healthy, sedentary, and active populations (1–3). Structural and functional changes in the microvasculature play a pivotal role in the pathogenesis of cardiovascular disease, hypertension, and diabetes (4,5). Therefore, muscle BOLD may be a powerful tool for measuring peripheral vascular function in individuals with peripheral arterial occlusive disease (6), obesity (7), and diabetes (7,8). Despite these advances, muscle BOLD imaging still suffers from relatively low signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and an incomplete understanding of its biophysical basis.
Muscle BOLD contrast results primarily from changes in hemoglobin content and oxygen saturation, acting through extravascular and intravascular relaxation mechanisms (9). The relative contributions of extravascular and intravascular contrast depend on the microvascular architecture. Unlike the case in the brain, blood vessels in skeletal muscle are primarily oriented parallel to each other and to the muscle fibers (5), imparting an orientation-dependence to the extravascular BOLD effect. When muscle fibers are aligned parallel to B0, as is the case in many MRI experiments, the extravascular contribution to the BOLD effect at field strengths of 3T or lower is negligible (1,7,10). Conversely, at higher field strengths such as 7T, the T2* of blood (~9 ms; (11)) is several rimwa shorter than at 3T (12). Therefore, intravascular muscle BOLD contrast is likely to be small at 7T, while extravascular contrast is expected to dominate. If this is indeed the case, muscle BOLD studies at ultra-high field strengths may provide contrast that is also sensitive to structural features of the microvasculature.
Translating muscle BOLD studies to ultra-high field strengths such as 7T would expand our understanding of the biophysical basis of muscle BOLD and increase the utility of this technique in biomedical imaging. In addition to providing sensitivity to novel contrast mechanisms, muscle BOLD studies at ultra-high field strengths will benefit from increased SNR due to greater spin polarization and increased contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR; (13,14)). The increased SNR and CNR may improve the diagnostic capabilities of muscle BOLD imaging and could be used to improve both the spatial and temporal resolution of imaging studies. Collectively, the known and potential advantages of imaging at 7T provide compelling reasons to expand muscle BOLD to 7T.
Although promising, muscle BOLD imaging at ultra-high field strengths is challenging. At 7T, there can be large variation in both B0 and B1 as well as greater RF power requirements (15). B0 inhomogeneities can lead to distorted images and unwanted signals from incomplete suppression of blood and/or fat. Image-based shimming routines and dynamic shimming can mitigate some of the B0 inhomogeneities; however, the problems caused by the different resonant frequencies of water and fat can be difficult to overcome (17). B1 inhomogeneities result in nonuniform absorption of RF energy, creating “hot spots” of high signal in some areas and areas of low signal elsewhere. Novel coil designs and tailored RF pulses can overcome these issues (18), however, they have had limited application outside of brain fMRI. If the challenges of muscle BOLD imaging at ultra-high fields can be overcome, as preliminary studies suggest (19,20), muscle BOLD imaging at 7T may provide information regarding peripheral vascular health not available at lower field strengths. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to expand the use of postcontractile muscle BOLD imaging to 7T. The results of this study demonstrate not just the feasibility of this technique in general, but also its ability to reveal previously undescribed inter-individual differences in the physiological responses to muscle contraction.
METHODS
Thirteen subjects (four females, mean±standard deviation; age 28.3±6.8 years, height 175.3±4.8 cm, and body mass 76.0±4.8 kg) participated in the study. Prior to participation, all subjects gave written informed consent in accordance with the local institutional review board. All subjects were free from physician-diagnosed chronic disease. Subjects reported to the imaging center for a consenting and habituation session and an experimental testing session. On the initial visit, subjects read and signed the informed consent document and completed a health-history questionnaire and a magnetic materials safety screening form. Subjects were familiarized with the exercise procedures, their maximum voluntary isometric plantarflexor contraction (MVC) force was measured, and they practiced the contraction protocol. Criteria for an acceptable contraction included reaching peak force rapidly, maintaining a consistent force for 2 s, using proper technique including minimal involvement of accessory muscles, and returning to baseline rapidly. A contraction was considered maximal when the force varied by less than 5% for two subsequent contractions, did not increase with increased coaching or verbal encouragement, and was similar in force to that expected for a healthy individual with no known neuromuscular abnormalities.
To limit the influence of diet and exercise on study outcome variables, subjects were asked to refrain from the following: (i) vigorous exercise for at least 24 h prior to the testing, (ii) consuming caffeinated food or beverages for at least 6 h prior to testing, and (iii) taking any over-the-counter medication 24 h prior to the testing session. Each subject completed a pre-test questionnaire to assess compliance with pre-test conditions. Any subject not in compliance was rescheduled for testing at a later date.
MRI procedures:
Imaging was performed on a Philips Achieva 7T imager/spectrometer (Philips Healthcare, Best, The Netherlands) using a 20 cm, single-channel quadrature, transmit/receive volume coil (Nova Medical, Wilmington, MA, USA). The subject was positioned supine in the scanner with approximately the largest portion of the calf muscle of their dominant leg positioned in the center of the coil. The subject’s foot was secured to a custom-built MR-compatible isometric contraction device capable of measuring plantarflexion force (3,7,21). In addition, subjects were fitted with a custom harness, which, when secured to the patient table, limited translational motion in the foot-head direction during the contractions.
Three-plane localizers and high-resolution anatomical images were acquired to allow consistent planning of the functional images and to guide the placement of regions-of-interest during analysis of the functional images. The posterior compartment of the leg was shimmed using the pencil-beam volume shimming routine.
Functional images were acquired continuously for 14 min [single-slice, single shot, turbo field echo, turbo field echo, echo-planar imaging, TR/TE 1000/18 ms, 18 cm field of view (FOV), 64×64 acquisition matrix, 10 mm slice thickness] while the subjects performed seven, 2 s maximal isometric plantarflexor contractions (one contraction every 2 min). Force data were acquired continuously during the contraction protocol and each subject received verbal feedback after each contraction regarding the level of contraction force. To determine if inflow effects influenced the magnitude of the post-contractile BOLD response, seven subjects repeated the contraction protocol at a TR of 2500 ms. Subjects remained in the scanner without repositioning during the 5 min. rest period between the two contraction protocols.
The longitudinal relaxation time constant (T1) was measured in four additional subjects using an inversion recovery sequence with a turbo field echo readout. Single-slice data were acquired at approximately the largest cross-sectional area of calf with the following imaging parameters: inversion times (TI) logarithmically spaced between 10 ms and 10 s (16 values), B1/B0 insensitive inversion pulse duration = 8 ms, echo time (TE) = 1.10 ms, FOV = 180×180 mm2, in-plane resolution = 3×3 mm2, slice thickness = 10 mm. To evaluate the effect of TR on the estimates for T1, data were acquired at two different pre-delay times (TD) = 2500 and 10,000 ms, where TD is the time from the end of the readout to the next inversion pulse (22).
Data Analysis:
Images were analyzed in MATLAB version 2015a (The MathWorks®, Natick, MA) using custom-written code. Three regions-of-interest (each 2–3 cm2 in size) were drawn within the lateral, central, and medial regions of the soleus muscle. An example anatomical image is shown in Figure 1A. Example functional images are shown in Figures 1B,C, with regions-of-interest shown in Figure 1B. Regions-of-interest were specified to avoid visible vessels and connective tissue. The average SI of the three regions-of-interest was measured as a function of time in the functional images and the weighted average was calculated (Figure 1D). Each postcontractile transient was fitted to a ninth order polynomial using MATLAB’s polyfit function, similar to the procedure described in Reference (23). The peak signal was obtained from the line of best fit and the time-to-peak signal was determined by identifying the inflection in the derivative of the line of best fit. For each post-contractile transient, the baseline was taken as the average SI in the 5 s prior to the contraction. Peak SI was calculated as the highest percentage increase from baseline, excluding the movement artifact (Figure 1D). The post-contractile response was only analyzed if the force of the contraction was within 5% of the previously measured MVC; up to four contractions were analyzed per subject. Muscle force was calculated as the highest force achieved during each contraction. The coefficient of variation (CV%) in the peak SI was calculated to assess the between- and within-subject dispersion in the peak BOLD response. The T1 data were fitted in a nonlinear least squares manner to an inversion-recovery with reduced TD model. Unless otherwise stated, data are presented as mean±standard error (SE) or coefficient of variation (CV %). Data were analyzed in MATLAB version 2015a. Muscle BOLD responses and contraction forces at the two TR values were compared using a paired Student’s t-test and a Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to compare the T1 estimates from the two TD values. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.
Figure 1.
Sample anatomical imaging, functional imaging, and force production data. A. Representative anatomical image. B. and C. Functional images acquired at mid-calf from pre-contraction and peak-post contraction phases. In B, the location of the three regions of interest are indicated. D. Weighted average post-contraction signal time course and E. corresponding muscle force for each contraction. The large spikes in normalized SI are T1-related motion artifacts caused by movement of unsaturated spins into and out of the imaging plane during and after the muscle contraction. These data acquired during contraction were not included for analysis of the post-contraction time courses.
RESULTS
For the TR=1000 ms imaging sequence, post-contractile muscle BOLD responses ranging from 0.3–7.0% were detected in the soleus muscles of all subjects. For the full sample of 11 subjects, the mean peak bold response was 4.3±0.6%. The muscle BOLD transients peaked between 8 and 13 s after the contraction with a mean value of 9±1 s. In many cases, the responses also returned to near baseline within 30 s. Figure 1 shows sample anatomical (A), functional (B, C), post-contractile muscle BOLD responses (D) and muscle force data (E) during the isometric muscle contractions. In panel D, the large spikes in SI greater are T1-related motion artifacts caused by movement of unsaturated spins into and out of the imaging plane during and after the contraction (1). As can be seen by comparing panels D and E, the saturation artifacts are temporally aligned with muscle force.
The magnitude of the postcontractile muscle BOLD response was not influenced by T1-related inflow effects, as evidenced by the similar magnitude of the response at two different TR values (3.8±0.9 vs. 4.0±0.6 %, TR = 1000 or 2500 ms, respectively; n=7, p = 0.72); see sample data in Figure 2. Figure 2 also illustrates sample polynomial fitting results and the location of the peak SI and time-to-peak SI measurements. The muscle force during the two contraction protocols did not differ significantly (647.6±48.7 vs. 664.4±41.3 N for TR=1000 and 2500 ms, respectively; p = 0.47).
Figure 2.
Representative postcontractile muscle BOLD responses for a single subject acquired at two different TR values. The data points are the observed signals and the lines represent the best fit to a ninth order polynomial function. The red point indicates the peak postcontractile BOLD response. There was not a significant difference between the magnitude of postcontractile BOLD response (3.8±0.9 vs. 4.0±0.6 %; n=7; p = 0.72) when acquired at a TR of 1000 and 2500 ms, respectively.
Between-subject variability in the magnitude and time course of the muscle BOLD response is highlighted in Figure 3. Data are shown for the TR=1000 ms sequence. The subject in panel A displays a rapid response that peaks within 6–12 s and returns to baseline within 30 s after the contraction. Panel B shows an example of a subject with a small positive phase, followed by a prolonged post-contraction undershoot that reaches a nadir at 60 s post-contraction. The subject in panel C shows similar kinetics to the subject in panel A, but a lower magnitude of response. Like the subject in panel B, the subject depicted panel D also has a minimal peak BOLD response and a prolonged post-contraction undershoot. Although there is significant between-subject variability in the peak BOLD response (CV=50.2%), the response is repeatable within-subjects when the target force is achieved (CV=34.2%; see also Figures 1, panel D and Figure 3, panels E and F).
Figure 3:
Postcontractile BOLD responses for four individual subjects (panels A-D) and three consecutive responses from two other subjects (panels E and F). Panel A-D highlight the between-subjects variations in the muscle BOLD responses, which are likely due to differences in the magnitude and timing of the post-contractile increase in blood flow, the on-kinetics of mitochondrial respiration and or the architecture of the microvasculature in the muscle.
Figure 4 shows sample inversion recovery plots and images from a single subject acquired at two different TR values. The estimated T1s were 1884±7 ms and 1848±17 ms, for a TR of 2500 and 10,000 ms, respectively (p = 0.125). Comparable inversion ratios were achieved at the different TR values (signal fractions = 60.1±1.4 vs. 62.4±0.4 % for 2,500 and 10,000 ms, respectively; n = 4). These data suggest T1 can be readily measured at shorter TR values and this should prove useful when optimizing sequences at 7T.
Figure 4:
Inversion recovery curves acquired at two different TR values from the leg at mid-calf and the corresponding images. The estimated T1s were 1884±7 vs 1848.3±2 ms (n = 4, p = 0.125) and signal fractions were 60.1±1.4 vs. 62.4±0.4 % (n = 4) for the 2,500 and 10,000 ms acquisitions respectively.
DISCUSSION
This study demonstrates the feasibility of 7T, muscle BOLD-based studies of the physiological responses to brief isometric contractions. Consistent with previous reports (1,21), this study has also indicated that T1-related inflow effects do not directly influence the magnitude of the post-contractile muscle BOLD response. Lastly, this study has revealed considerable inter-individual heterogeneity in the temporal profile of these responses. All subjects had an initial positive muscle BOLD response that, in some subjects, was followed by a substantial negative muscle BOLD response. Given this feasibility, the greater magnitude of BOLD effects at 7T than at 3T (20), and the expected major dependence of 7T BOLD contrast on extravascular BOLD phenomena, 7T muscle BOLD imaging may provide insight into the microvascular and metabolic aspects of muscle contraction.
Post-Contraction muscle BOLD imaging is feasible at 7T
Using an MR compatible ergometer and a standard gradient-echo sequence, we detected muscle BOLD transients between 0.3 and 7.0% in the soleus muscle following 2 s maximal isometric plantarflexion contractions. Hennig et al. originally reported a BOLD-like contrast in muscles of the leg following 3 s muscle contractions (24). Subsequent studies confirmed the postcontractile BOLD response (25) and attributed it to intravascular changes in hemoglobin saturation and blood volume (2,21). The findings of the present study are consistent with these and other previous reports (1,3,21,24) showing transient changes in muscle BOLD contrast of up to8%, peaking ~10–15 s after the muscle contraction. Direct comparison between the present study and these previous studies should be made with caution however, as differences in B0 field, MRI acquisition parameters (21), and exercise protocols may contribute to differences in the peak change and the time course of post-contraction muscle BOLD signal changes.
The technical challenges of ultra-high field MRI studies have been described previously (26,27). In musculoskeletal imaging, B0 and B1 inhomogeneities are particularly problematic due to heterogeneity in the chemical shift and magnetic susceptibility of the tissues in the imaging plane. In this study, we used localized B0 shimming routines over the posterior compartment of the leg to improve the field homogeneity in this anatomy of interest. The general pattern of lengthening of T1, shortening of T2, and disproportionate shortening of T2* provided additional challenges common at ultra-high fields.
Biophysical aspects of 7T muscle BOLD imaging
Quantitative models (1,2) and experimental data (28) suggest a negligible contribution from extravascular BOLD contrast in muscle at magnetic field strength of 3T or less. Extravascular BOLD contrast relies heavily on two properties of tissue; 1) the rate of diffusion of water in the tissue, and 2) the geometry of the microvasculature, including the density of vessels and their orientation relative to B0 (29). In skeletal muscle, the diffusion of water is rapid (~1.7 × 10−5 cm2/s (30,31), nearly twice that of brain water (32)). Furthermore, the vasculature in skeletal muscle, which compromises approximately 3% of the tissue volume, is dominated by capillaries with a mean diameter of ~5 μm. The rapid diffusion of water around small vessels effectively averages out the effect of vessel-induced inhomogenities (1). These features of muscle are present regardless of field strength. However, the magnetic susceptibility difference between the blood and the tissue is proportional to the square of the magnetic field strength, increasing the magnitude of extravascular BOLD effects at ultra-high fields (33,34). Combined with the much shorter T2* of blood than of muscle at 7T (~9 versus 16 ms, respectively (11,20)), the contribution from intravascular BOLD contrast mechanisms is expected to be small at 7T. Rather, extravascular BOLD mechanisms are expected to dominate.
Several other factors are expected to affect the balance of intravascular and extravascular BOLD contrast in muscle. First, extravascular BOLD contrast is also affected by vessel density and orientation (29,35). Thus, individual differences in vascular anatomy, such as the up-to 30% greater vessel density in chronically endurance trained individuals (36), may cause extravascular BOLD contrast to vary as well. Conversely, in an animal model of diabetes, skeletal muscle capillaries are both smaller and less tortuous than control animals (5). A second factor is the muscle length, when expressed relative to the optimum length for force generation. In mammalian skeletal muscle, the capillaries’ geometries depend on muscle length (37). In muscles at resting length or greater, the capillaries are oriented parallel to the long axis of the fibers. At shortened muscle lengths, however, there is significant tortuosity in the capillaries. This interpretation does not negate previous findings of negligible extravascular BOLD contrast in muscle BOLD studies at field strengths of 3T or less (2,28). However, it does suggest that extravascular BOLD contrast may vary with the relative muscle length, and at some muscle lengths extravascular BOLD effects may have an even greater contribution to muscle BOLD contrast at ultra-high field strengths.
In the present study we also evaluated the possible contribution of inflow effects, the apparent T1 shortening caused by the introduction of unsaturated spins to the slice plane by way of flow, to the post-contraction BOLD signal changes. Although studies at 3T have conducted similar analyses (1,21), the present study should not be viewed as merely confirmatory. Rather, the T1 values at 7T for blood (38) and muscle (present study) and at 3T for blood (39) and muscle (31) suggest a tissue-specific field strength dependence of T1. This merits a specific evaluation of this potential contrast mechanism at 7T. The present findings indicate that for TR value in the range of 1000–2500 ms, inflow effects do not contribute significantly to the post-contractile BOLD signal changes.
Physiological aspects of 7T muscle BOLD imaging
Extravascular BOLD contrast mechanisms are the most likely direct, biophysical influence on the post-contractile muscle BOLD response. However, the primary physiological influence on post-contractile muscle BOLD contrast is likely to be contraction-induced hyperemia. The exact mechanism(s) for exercise hyperemia are not fully understood, and it appears that no single vasodilator is obligatory (40–42). Moreover, the contribution of specific vasodilators to exercise hyperemia may vary depending on the exercise task (43) and the branch of the vascular tree studied (44). For brief contractions such as these, the hyperemic response is a consequence of many factors. The myogenic effect and the muscle pump contribute to the early phase of exercise hyperemia and result from the contraction-induced increase in intramuscular pressure (45) to values as high as 570 Torr (46). This increase in intramuscular pressure reduces transmural pressure and elicits relaxation of the vascular smooth muscle cells through mechanically-coupled membrane channels (47,48). The increase in intramuscular pressure also empties the venous vasculature and blood flow increases due to the widening of the arterial-venous pressure gradients (49,50).
Other contributors to exercise hyperemia include K+ (51–54), a yet to be identified endothelium-derived hyperpolarizing factor (55–57), and nitric oxide. It is likely that the hyperemic response to exercise is controlled by a variety of factors whose relative impacts are governed by the contraction duration and intensity. Importantly, myogenic tone, endothelium-derived hyperpolarizing factor, and nitric oxide – three vasodilators prominent in exercise hyperemia – have been implicated in the pathogenesis of obesity and diabetes (55,58,59).
There was considerable between-subject variability in the magnitude and time course post-contractile muscle BOLD response. The peak increase in post-contractile muscle BOLD-weighted SI however was similar to those reported previously despite differences in the duration of contractions, field strength, and the muscle exercised (1,3,7,21). In this study we opted for a muscle contraction of 2 s in order to elicit a larger hyperemic response at a still-low metabolic demand. Previously, we demonstrated that a single 1 s contraction can elicit a 2 to 11-fold increase in blood flow above rest, with the highest flows occurring in chronically active individuals (2). Although not independently verified, many subjects in this study reported some level of physical activity, including an avid distance runner and a college soccer player. Based on these anecdotal reports of the subjects’ activity patterns and our previous study (2), it is likely that differences in chronic physical activity levels contributed to the between-subject variability.
In this protocol we allowed for 2 min of recovery between each contraction. In some, but not all subjects, this was sufficient to allow full recovery (for example, Figures 1 and 2/ panels A, C, E and F). In individuals with low muscle oxidative capacity and a time constant for PCr recovery of 45–50 s, the post-contraction response may persist well beyond 2 min. However individuals with faster PCr recovery kinetics/mitochondria on-kinetics would be expected to have a lower peak BOLD and potentially a larger post-contraction undershoot (2). The magnitude of the peak muscle BOLD response aside, the time course of the muscle BOLD response looks strikingly similar across subjects for up to 30 s after the contraction, with peak responses occurring between 8 and 13 s after contraction. However, between 30 and 120 s post-contraction, there is considerable variability in the response. In three of the subjects there was a prominent post-contraction undershoot similar to that seen Figure 2B, D. This large and prolonged post-contraction undershoot makes calculating and interpreting the recovery characteristics difficult using simple measures of signal elevation and suggests that alternative data analysis strategies may be required.
Previous studies either used a shorter rest period between contractions or did not display all of the individual subject data, and so there is no way of knowing if this inter-individual heterogeneity in the post-contraction muscle BOLD signal time course is present in other studies or our unique to ours. Regardless, these findings suggest considerable value in analyzing the kinetics of the response in addition to the peak magnitude. Given the physiologic dependences just described and the predictions of modeling studies about the physiologic determinants of the post-contractile muscle BOLD time course (2), the variability in the kinetics and magnitude of the post-contraction muscle BOLD response at 7T may represent subject-specific differences in microvascular structure and function and/or mitochondrial oxidative capacity. Analyzing the kinetics and amplitudes of the post-contractile positive and negative muscle BOLD responses may provide insight into vascular vs. metabolic dysfunction in diabetes and the metabolic syndrome. Indeed, contraction-induced muscle BOLD imaging has been used to study pathological conditions including obesity and diabetes (7,8).
Summary and conclusions
In summary, muscle BOLD imaging is feasible at 7T and reveals considerable inter-individual variability in the physiological responses to muscle contraction. A sufficient understanding of the contributions from extravascular and intravascular BOLD contrast mechanisms at 7T and how factors such as oxygen supply and demand influence post-contractile muscle BOLD contrast, new insight may be gained into vascular and metabolic aspects of chronic diseases.
Grant support:
NIH/NIAMS R01 AR050101, NIH/NCATS UL1 TR000445, NIH/NIBIB K25 EB013659, NIH/NIBIB T32 EB001628
Abbreviations used:
- BOLD
blood oxygenation-level dependent
- RF
radiofrequency
- SI
signal intensity
- CNR
contrast-to-noise ratio
REFERENCES
- 1.Meyer RA, Towse TF, Reid RW, Jayaraman RC, Wiseman RW, McCully KK. BOLD MRI mapping of transient hyperemia in skeletal muscle after single contractions. NMR Biomed 2004;17:392–398. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Towse TF, Slade JM, Ambrose JA, DeLano MC, Meyer RA. Quantitative analysis of the postcontractile blood-oxygenation-level-dependent (BOLD) effect in skeletal muscle. J Appl Physiol 2011;111:27–39. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Towse TF, Slade JM, Meyer RA. Effect of physical activity on MRI-measured blood oxygen level-dependent transients in skeletal muscle after brief contractions. J Appl Physiol 2005;99:715–722. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Rowley NJ, Green DJ, George K, Thijssen DHJ, Oxborough D, Sharma S, Somauroo JD, Jones J, Sheikh N, Whyte G. Peripheral vascular structure and function in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Br. J. Sports Med 2012;46 Suppl 1:i98–103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Kindig CA, Sexton WL, Fedde MR, Poole DC. Skeletal muscle microcirculatory structure and hemodynamics in diabetes. Respir. Physiol 1998;111(2):163–175. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Buchert M Bilecen D, Winterer J, Schulte A, Langer M, Hennig J. Time resolved BOLD response in the muscle of patients with peripheral vascular occlusive disease. Proc. Int. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med 2002;10. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Sanchez OA, Copenhaver EA, Chance MA, Fowler MJ, Towse TF, Kent-Braun JA, Damon BM. Postmaximal contraction blood volume responses are blunted in obese and type 2 diabetic subjects in a muscle-specific manner. Am J Physiol Hear. Circ Physiol 2011;301:H418–27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Slade JM, Towse TF, Gossain VV., Meyer RA. Peripheral microvascular response to muscle contraction is unaltered by early diabetes, but decreases with age. J Appl Physiol 2011;111:1361–1371. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Lebon V, Carlier PG, Brillault-Salvat C, Leroy-Willig A. Simultaneous measurement of perfusion and oxygenation changes using a multiple gradient-echo sequence: application to human muscle study. Magn. Reson. imaging. 1998;16(7):721–729. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Utz W, Jordan J, Niendorf T, Stoffels M, Luft FC, Dietz R, Friedrich MG. Blood oxygen level-dependent MRI of tissue oxygenation: relation to endothelium-dependent and endothelium-independent blood flow changes. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol 2005;25:1408–13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Blockley NP, Jiang L, Gardener AG, Ludman CN, Francis ST, Gowland PA. Field strength dependence of R1 and R2* relaxivities of human whole blood to ProHance, Vasovist, and deoxyhemoglobin. Magn. Reson. Med 2008;60:1313–20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Zhao JM, Clingman CS, Narvainen MJ, Kauppinen RA, van Zijl PC. Oxygenation and hematocrit dependence of transverse relaxation rates of blood at 3T. Magn Reson Med 2007;58:592–597. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Okada T, Yamada H, Ito H, Yonekura Y, Sadato N. Magnetic field strength increase yields significantly greater contrast-to-noise ratio increase: Measured using BOLD contrast in the primary visual area. Acad Radiol 2005;12(2):142–147. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Ogawa S, Menon RS, Kim SG, Ugurbil K. On the characteristics of functional magnetic resonance imaging of the brain. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct 1998;27:447–474. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Regatte RR, Schweitzer ME. Ultra-high-field MRI of the musculoskeletal system at 7.0T. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2007;25:262–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Parasoglou P, Xia D, Chang G, Regatte RR. Dynamic three-dimensional imaging of phosphocreatine recovery kinetics in the human lower leg muscles at 3T and 7T: a preliminary study. NMR Biomed 2013;26:348–56. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Sengupta S, Welch EB, Zhao Y, Foxall D, Starewicz P, Anderson AW, Gore JC, Avison MJ. Dynamic B0 shimming at 7 T. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2011;29:483–96. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Sharma A, Bammer R, Stenger VA, Grissom WA. Low peak power multiband spokes pulses for B1 (+) inhomogeneity-compensated simultaneous multislice excitation in high field MRI. Magn. Reson. Med 2014;00:1–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Schewzow K, Fiedler GB, Meyerspeer M, Goluch S, Laistler E, Wolzt M, Moser E, Schmid AI. Dynamic ASL and T2*-weighted MRI in exercising calf muscle at 7 T: A feasibility study. Magn. Reson. Med 2014;00:1–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Towse TF, Childs BT, Sabin SA, Bush EC, Elder CP, Damon BM. Comparison of muscle BOLD responses to arterial occlusion at 3 and 7 Tesla. Magn. Reson. Med:2015. April 17. doi: 10.1002/mrm.25562. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Damon BM, Hornberger JL, Wadington MC, Lansdown DA, Kent-Braun JA. Dual gradient-echo MRI of post-contraction changes in skeletal muscle blood volume and oxygenation. Magn Reson Med 2007;57:670–679. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Dortch RD, Moore J, Li K, Jankiewicz M, Gochberg DF, Hirtle JA, Gore JC, Smith SA. Quantitative magnetization transfer imaging of human brain at 7 T. Neuroimage 2013;64:640–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Sanchez OA, Louie EA, Copenhaver EA, Damon BM. Repeatability of a dual gradient-recalled echo MRI method for monitoring post-isometric contraction blood volume and oxygenation changes. NMR Biomed 2009;22:753–761. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Hennig J Schreiber A S K. Time resolved observations of BOLD effect in muscle during isometric exercise. Proc. Int. Soc. Magn. Reson. Med 2000;8:1. [Google Scholar]
- 25.Towse Slade J, Meyer TF. MRI-measured BOLD transients in skeletal muscle after brief contractions in healthy elderly subjects. Integr. Biol. Exerc 2006:1–2. [Google Scholar]
- 26.Moser E, Stahlberg F, Ladd ME, Trattnig S. 7-T MR-from research to clinical applications? NMR Biomed 2012;25:695–716. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Chang G, Wang L, Cárdenas-Blanco A, Schweitzer M, Recht M, Regatte R. Biochemical and Physiological MR Imaging of Skeletal Muscle at 7 Tesla and Above. Semin. Musculoskelet. Radiol 2010;14:269–278. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Sanchez OA, Copenhaver EA, Elder CP, Damon BM. Absence of a significant extravascular contribution to the skeletal muscle BOLD effect at 3 T. Magn Reson Med 2011;64:527–535. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Kennan RP, Zhong J, Gore JC. Intravascular susceptibility contrast mechanisms in tissues. Magn. Reson. Med 1994;31(1):9–21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Heemskerk AM, Sinha TK, Wilson KJ, Ding Z, Damon BM. Repeatability of DTI-based skeletal muscle fiber tracking. NMR Biomed 2010;23:294–303. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Li K, Dortch RD, Welch EB, Bryant ND, Buck AKW, Towse TF, Gochberg DF, Does MD, Damon BM, Park JH. Multi-parametric MRI characterization of healthy human thigh muscles at 3.0 T - relaxation, magnetization transfer, fat/water, and diffusion tensor imaging. NMR Biomed 2014;27:1070–84. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Johnson KM, Tao JZ, Kennan RP, Gore JC. Intravascular susceptibility agent effects on tissue transverse relaxation rates in vivo. Magn. Reson. Med 2000;44(6):909–914. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Gati JS, Menon RS, Ugurbil K, Rutt BK. Experimental determination of the BOLD field strength dependence in vessels and tissue. Magn. Reson. Med 1997;38(2):296–302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Ogawa S, Menon RS, Tank DW, Kim SG, Merkle H, Ellermann JM, Ugurbil K. Functional brain mapping by blood oxygenation level-dependent contrast magnetic resonance imaging. A comparison of signal characteristics with a biophysical model. Biophys. Journal 1993;64:803–812. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Zhong J, Kennan RP, Fulbright RK, Gore JC. Quantification of intravascular and extravascular contributions to BOLD effects induced by alteration in oxygenation or intravascular contrast agents. Magn. Reson. Med 1998;40(4):526–536. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Brodal P, Ingjer F, Hermansen L. Capillary supply of skeletal muscle fibers in untrained and endurance-trained men. Am J Physiol 1977;232(6):H705–12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Diego S, Jolla L. Capillary Tortuosity and Degree of Contraction or Extension of Skeletal Muscles. Microvasc. Res 2000;117:98–117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Rane SD, Gore JC. Measurement of T1 of human arterial and venous blood at 7T. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2013;31:477–479. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Lu H, Clingman C, Golay X, Van Zijl PCM. Determining the longitudinal relaxation time (T1) of blood at 3.0 tesla. Magn. Reson. Med 2004;52:679–682. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Clifford PS, Hellsten Y. Vasodilatory mechanisms in contracting skeletal muscle. J. Appl. Physiol 2004;97(1):393–403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Buckwalter JB, Ruble SB, Mueller PJ, Clifford PS. Skeletal muscle vasodilation at the onset of exercise. J. Appl. Physiol 1998;85(5):1649–1654. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Wunsch SA, Muller-Delp J, Delp MD. Time course of vasodilatory responses in skeletal muscle arterioles: role in hyperemia at onset of exercise. Am. J. Physiol. Hear. Circ. Physiol 2000;279(4):H1715–23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Delp MD, Laughlin MH. Regulation of skeletal muscle perfusion during exercise. Acta Physiol. Scand 1998. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Jackson WF, Blair KL, William F, Characteriza- KLB. Characterization and function of Ca 2 + -activated K + channels in arteriolar muscle cells. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol 1998;43:H27–H34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Clifford PS. Skeletal muscle vasodilation at the onset of exercise. J. Physiol 2007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Sejersted OM, Hargens AR, Kardel KR, Blom P, Jensen O, Hermansen L. Intramuscular fluid pressure during-isometric contraction of human skeletal muscle. J. Appl. Physiol 1984. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Schubert R, Mulvany MJ. The myogenic response: established facts and attractive hypotheses. Clin Sci 1999;96:313–326. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Davis MJ, Hill MA. Signaling mechanisms underlying the vascular myogenic response. Physiol Rev 1999;79:387–423. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Laughlin MH, Joyner M. Closer to the edge? Contractions, pressures, waterfalls and blood flow to contracting skeletal muscle. J Appl Physiol 2003;94:3–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Laughlin MH, Schrage WG. Effects of muscle contraction on skeletal muscle blood flow: when is there a muscle pump? Med. Sci. Sport. Exerc 1999;31:1027–1035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Haddy FJ, Vanhoutte PM, Feletou M. Role of potassium in regulating blood flow and blood pressure. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 2006;290(3):R546–52. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Murray PA, Belloni FL, Sparks HV. The role of potassium in the metabolic control of coronary vascular resistance of the dog. Circ Res 1979;44:767–780. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Burns WR, Cohen KD, Jackson WF. K+-induced dilation of hamster cremasteric arterioles involves both the Na+/K+-ATPase and inward-rectifier K+ channels. Microcirculation 2004;11:279–293. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Mohrman DE, Sparks HV. Myogenic hyperemia following brief tetanus of canine skeletal muscle. Am. J. Physiol 1974;227(3):531–535. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Taylor PD, Khan IY, Hanson MA, Poston L. Impaired EDHF-mediated vasodilatation in adult offspring of rats exposed to a fat-rich diet in pregnancy. J. Physiol 2004;558(Pt) 3:943–951. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Si H, Heyken WT, Wèolfle SE, et al. Impaired endothelium-derived hyperpolarizing factor-mediated dilations and increased blood pressure in mice deficient of the intermediate-conductance Ca2+-activated K+ channel. Circ Res 2006;99(5):537–544. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Sandow SL. Factors, fiction and endothelium-derived hyperpolarizing factor. Clin. Exp. Pharmacol. Physiol 2004;31(9):563–570. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Caballero AE, Arora S, Saouaf R, Lim SC, Smakowski P, Park JY, King GL, LoGerfo FW, Horton ES, Veves A. Microvascular and macrovascular reactivity is reduced in subjects at risk for type 2 diabetes. Diabetes 1999;48(9):1856–1862. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Avogaro A, Toffolo G, Kiwanuka E, de Kreutzenberg SV, Tessari P, Cobelli C. L-arginine-nitric oxide kinetics in normal and type 2 diabetic subjects: a stable-labelled 15N arginine approach. Diabetes 2003;52:795–802. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]




