Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis logoLink to Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis
. 2019 Mar 21;33(5):e22884. doi: 10.1002/jcla.22884

Genetic diversity and drug resistance of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in Yunnan, China

Daoqun Li 1,2, Yuzhu Song 2, Pengpeng Yang 2, Xiaofei Li 3, A‐Mei Zhang 1,2,, Xueshan Xia 1,2,
PMCID: PMC6595362  PMID: 30896073

Abstract

Background

China is a country with high burden of tuberculosis (TB), especially drug‐resistant TB (DR‐TB), which is still a serious health problem in Yunnan Province. Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) is the pathogenic microorganism of TB. The epidemiological characteristics of MTB strains in local areas need to be described.

Methods

A total of 430 clinical MTB isolates were collected from Yunnan Province and genotyped through the method of 24‐locus mycobacterial interspersed repetitive unit‐variable number tandem DNA repeats (MIRU‐VNTR).

Results

The genotypes of the 24 loci showed abundantly genetic diversity, and allelic diversity index (h) of these loci varied from 0.012 to 0.817. Among the 430 strains, 30 clusters and 370 unique genotypes were identified. Beijing family was the predominant lineage (70.47%) in Yunnan MTB strains, and the other lineages contained T family (5.81%), MANU2 (0.70%), LAM (3.26%), CAS (0.23%), New‐1 (8.37%), and some unknown clades (11.16%). A total of 74 TB strains were identified as drug resistance through drug susceptibility testing (DST), including 38 multidrug‐resistant TB (MDR‐TB) and 36 single‐drug‐resistant TB (SDR‐TB). The frequency of MDR‐TB strains was significantly higher in Beijing family (10.89%) than that in non‐Beijing family (3.94%, P = 0.032).

Conclusions

Although MTB strains showed high genetic diversity in Yunnan, China, the Beijing family was still the dominant strain. A high frequency of MDR‐TB strains was recorded in the Beijing family.

Keywords: 24‐locus MIRU‐VNTR, Beijing family, drug resistance, Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Yunnan

1. INTRODUCTION

Currently, tuberculosis (TB) is still the major pathogen of infectious diseases and the 9th cause of death worldwide.1 The lung is mostly infected by Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB), whereas other tissues are rarely involved. According to the “Global tuberculosis report 2017,”2 about 10.4 million MTB‐infected persons developed TB (including 6.3 million new cases). Among these cases, approximately 1.674 million individuals died of TB.2 China ranked 3rd among the country with high TB burden, next to India and Indonesia. In 2016, 895 000 individuals were infected with MTB, while 51 800 persons died of TB. Although the incidence and mortality of TB gradually decreased through Directly Observed Therapy Short Course (DOTS) strategy, TB remained as a major public health problem due to the increasing number of HIV‐infected persons, drug‐resistant TB cases, and healthcare delay.3

The genotypes of MTB have proven to be a valuable tool in characteristics of strains, treatment effect of drug‐resistant TB, tracking transmission, predicting outbreaks and pathological properties, and evaluating the immune response.4, 5 IS6110‐RFLP is the first and classic method for genotyping MTB strains and is widely used since the early 1990s.6 Many methods have been invented based on PCR.7 Recently, the mycobacterial interspersed repetitive unit‐variable number tandem repeat (MIRU‐VNTR) method is the prevailing clinical technique because of its rapid, better repeatability, high‐throughput, and digitized analysis.8, 9 Among the different sets of MIRU‐VNTR loci described for genotyping MTB isolates,10, 11 a system based on 12, 15, and 24 loci is currently the most widely used in TB control systems in China.9, 12, 13 It aids in the elucidation of the phylogenetic relationships among clinical isolates and the identification of high‐risk groups that are susceptible to TB infection. Beijing genotype is associated with drug resistance, showing an increased drug resistance level. It possibly explains the wide distribution of the Beijing family.14 However, other studies did not show a relationship between drug resistance and strain clade.15

Yunnan belongs to the regions in China, where TB is prevalent. TB morbidity reached 6‰ in Yunnan population due to high incidence of various infectious diseases, large rural cohort, and limited medical condition.16 In addition, the genetic diversity of MTB was more plenty in Yunnan than in the other regions.12, 17 This study aims to investigate the genetic diversity and molecular epidemiology of MTB in the Yunnan population.

2. MATERIALS AND METHODS

2.1. MTB strain collection and drug susceptibility testing (DST) assay

A total of 430 samples of MTB strains were obtained from pulmonary TB patients from December 2013 to September 2017, who were diagnosed and treated by doctors in the Third People's Hospital of Kunming. The strains were cultured in Löwenstein‐Jensen (LJ) media. All pulmonary TB patients were from Yunnan Province. DST was performed in all MTB strains by using five first‐line drugs (streptomycin [SM], pyrazinamide [PZA], isoniazid [INH], rifampin [RIF], and ethambutol [EMB]), and part of the cases was reported in our previous study.18 Written informed consents conforming to the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki were obtained from each participant prior to the study. This study was approved by the institutional review board of Kunming University of Science and Technology.

2.2. 24‐locus MIRU‐VNTR genotyping

Genomic DNA was extracted from all MTB isolates by using the Bacteria DNA Kit (TIANamp, China) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Fragments of 24‐locus MIRU‐VNTR were amplified and genotyped as previously described.10 The PCR products were analyzed by using 3% agarose electrophoresis at 5 V/cm for 90 minutes. The 100‐bp DNA ladder and the amplicons of standard strain H37Rv were used as markers to evaluate the results. 5% of the genotyping results were randomly identified through direct sequencing.

2.3. Data analysis

The allelic diversity of the VNTR locus was calculated by using the formula h = 1‐∑xi 2 [n/(n −1)], where xi is the allele frequency of locus, and n is the number of isolates. The h index could indirectly evaluate the heterogeneity of the locus in MTB strains. The Hunter‐Gaston discriminatory index (HGDI) was used to calculate the discriminatory power of each method.19 The VNTR loci were classified into three groups, as described by Sola et al,20 according to the HGDI. In brief, the VNTR loci were designated as high, moderate, and poor discriminatory at HGDI of >0.6, ⩾0.3 and ⩽0.6, and <0.3, respectively. The dendrogram was generated by using the unweighted pair group method with arithmetic mean (UPGMA). Beijing (ID: 3243/02 and 2351/02), LAM (ID: 4428/02, 4431/02, 7968/03, 8885/03, 4218/03, 4219/03, 4220/03, and 4221/03), T (ID: 5211/02, 5212/02, and 5213/02), Delhi/CAS (ID: 1805/02 and 7936/01), MANU2 (ID: 3215/01), and NEW‐1 (ID: 8870/03) family strains were used as reference strains to construct the genetic phylotree of MTB, which were downloaded from the MIRU‐VNTRplus web (http://www.miru-vntrplus.org). The clustering rate was calculated following the method of Zhao et al9 All data were analyzed through using the SPSS software package (Version 19.0), and statistical difference was considered at P < 0.05.

3. RESULTS

3.1. Results of DST

A total of 74 MTB strains were identified as drug‐resistant TB through DST. Among which, 38 and 36 strains were multidrug‐ and single‐resistant TB strains, respectively. Multidrug‐resistant TB strains account for 51.4% of the drug‐resistant strains. Among the single‐resistant TB strains, the number of SM, PZA, INH, RIF, and EMB strains were 4 (4/430 = 0.93%), 6 (6/430 = 1.40%), 17 (17/430 = 3.95%), 4 (4/430 = 0.93%), and 5 (5/430 = 1.16%), respectively. The remaining 356 (356/430 = 82.79%) isolates were drug‐sensitive TB strains.

3.2. Comparison among 12‐, 15‐, and 24‐locus MIRU‐VNTR

Considering that the genotyped 24 loci could cover all the loci of the 12‐ and 15‐locus MIRU‐VNTR, we first compared the HGDI of the 12‐, 15‐, and 24‐locus MIRU‐VNTR. The HGDI of the 15‐ (0.9996) and 24‐locus (0.9997) was slightly higher than that of 12‐locus (0.9928). A total of 287, 397, and 400 genotypes were obtained from 430 isolates by using 12‐, 15‐, and 24‐locus MIRU‐VNTR with clustering rate of 33.26%, 8.37%, and 6.98%, respectively (Table 1 and Figure 1). These results indicated the high allelic diversity of MTB strains determined by the 24‐locus MIRU‐VNTR. Compared with the 12‐locus MIRU‐VNTR, the number of unknown MTB strains in 15‐ and 24‐locus MIRU‐VNTR was significantly less (Table 2). Besides, the 15‐ and 24‐locus MIRU‐VNTR methods had improved the discrimination of Beijing, CAS, NEW‐1, and Unknown MTB strains. 24‐locus MIRU‐VNTR was used in further analysis of this study.

Table 1.

Comparison of discriminatory power of 12‐, 15‐, and 24‐locus MIRU‐VNTR

Typing method No. of genotypes No. of unique genotypes No. of clusters No. of clustered isolates Maximum no. of isolates in one cluster Clustering rate (%) HGDI
12‐locus 287 221 66 209 31 33.26 0.9928
15‐locus 397 365 32 65 3 8.37 0.9996
24‐locus 400 370 30 60 2 6.98 0.9997

HGDI means the Hunter‐Gaston discriminatory index.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

UPGMA tree of 430 clinical MTB strains based on 24‐locus MIRU‐VNTR by using the MIRU‐VNTRplus database. Sample number and family of each strain were noted in the figure

Table 2.

Lineages distribution through 12‐, 15‐, and 24‐locus MIRU‐VNTR

Lineage 12‐locus 15‐locus 24‐locus P [Link] P [Link] P [Link]
Beijing 215 (50%) 305 (70.93%) 303 (70.47%) 0.001* 0.001* 0.881
T 29 (6.74%) 25 (5.81%) 25 (5.81%) 0.574 0.574 1.000
MANU2 2 (0.50%) 2 (0.50%) 3 (0.70%) 1.000 0.654 0.654
LAM 15 (3.50%) 14 (3.26%) 14 (3.26%) 0.850 0.850 1.000
CAS 12 (2.79%) 1 (0.23%) 1 (0.23%) 0.002* 0.002* 1.000
NEW‐1 2 (0.47%) 31 (7.21%) 36 (8.37%) 0.001* 0.001* 0.525
Unknown 155 (36%) 52 (12.06%) 48 (11.16%) 0.001* 0.001* 0.670

P value of < 0.05 was labeled as *.

Means P value was calculated between 12‐locus MIRU‐VNTR and 15‐locus MIRU‐VNTR.

Means P value was calculated between 12‐locus MIRU‐VNTR and 24‐locus MIRU‐VNTR.

Means P value was calculated between 15‐locus MIRU‐VNTR and 24‐locus MIRU‐VNTR.

3.3. Allelic diversity of 24 MIRU‐VNTR loci

5% MIRU‐VNTR genotypes were randomly identified by using direct sequencing. A total of 400 distinct genotypes were identified in 430 TB strains through 24‐locus MIRU‐VNTR analysis, containing 370 unique isolates (86.05%) and 30 (13.95%) pairs of isolates (Table 1). Beijing family was the most predominant lineage in Yunnan MTB strains (303/430 = 70.47%). Other lineages included T (25/430 = 5.81%), LAM (14/430 = 3.26%), MANU2 (3/430 = 0.7%), CAS (1/430 = 0.23%), NEW‐1 (36/430 = 8.37%), and unknown clades (48/430 = 11.16%) (Table 2).

The diversity of each allele significantly differed from 0.012 to 0.817 (Table 3). QUB11b and MIRU02 showed the highest and lowest allelic diversity, respectively. Among the loci, 9 (MIRU02, MIRU04, MIRU20, MIRU23, MIRU24, MIRU27, ETR‐C, Mtub29, and Mtub34), 8 (MIRU10, MIRU16, MIRU40, ETR‐A, ETR‐B, Mtub30, Mtub39, and QUB4156), and 7 (MIRU26, MIRU31, MIRU39, Mtub04, Mtub21, QUB11b, and QUB26) showed poor, moderate, and high diversity, respectively (Table 3). In comparison with the h value of each locus between Beijing and non‐Beijing family, most of the above‐mentioned loci showed significantly different diversity, thereby indicating their various discriminability (Table 4).

Table 3.

Allelic diversity of 430 MTB strains by 24‐locus MIRU‐VNTR

Alias Copy no. of repetitive units h diversity
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
MIRU 02 1 2 427                       0.012 Poor
Mtub04   11 101 95 218 5                 0.637 High
ETR‐C   1 6 15 402 6                 0.122 Poor
MIRU 04 7 13 379 8 12 6 1 1 2         1 0.219 Poor
MIRU 40   26 58 308 28 6 4               0.459 Moderate
MIRU 10   20 134 263 11 1   1             0.525 Moderate
MIRU 16   11 53 281 79 6                 0.522 Moderate
Mtub21   27 13 111 157 105 6   4 3 4       0.735 High
MIRU 20   7 422 1                     0.034 Poor
QUB11b 1 9 20 75 68 65 122 62 7     1     0.817 High
ETR‐A   3 28 107 291 1                 0.475 Moderate
Mtub29     6 11 393 17 1 2             0.160 Poor
Mtub30   2 126 7 291 4                 0.455 Moderate
ETR‐B   93 336 1                     0.341 Moderate
MIRU 23     3 4 7 390 23 3             0.172 Poor
MIRU 24 1 426 3                       0.016 Poor
MIRU 26   9 6 10 19 93 58 149 69 14 1 2     0.784 High
MIRU 27   7 31 390 2                   0.170 Poor
Mtub34   1 21 404 1 3                 0.113 Poor
MIRU 31     18 96 29 258 23 4 2           0.580 High
Mtub39   25 28 282 83 12                 0.523 Moderate
QUB26     6 6 11 6 30 83 237 37 8 6     0.644 High
QUB4156   9 246 28 142 3 2               0.558 Moderate
MIRU 39 6 41 195 178 10                   0.612 High

h represents the h value of allelic diversity of each locus. The VNTR loci were designated as high, moderate, and poor discriminatory at h of >0.6, ⩾0.3 and ⩽0.6, and <0.3, respectively.

Table 4.

Allelic diversity of each locus in different MTB subgroups

Alias Locus Allelic diversity (h) for
Drug‐sensitive TB
(n = 356)
MDR‐TB
(n = 38)
SDR‐TB
(n = 36)
Beijing family
(n = 303)
Non‐Beijing
(n = 127)
MIRU 02 154 0.008 0.026 0 0.003 0.023
Mtub04 424 0.646 0.467 0.652 0.543 0.676
ETR‐C 577 0.116 0.175 0.081 0.105 0.142
MIRU 04 580 0.222 0.220 0.133 0.147 0.182
MIRU 40 802 0.482 0.127 0.470 0.307 0.663
MIRU 10 960 0.527 0.538 0.411 0.367 0.529
MIRU 16 1644 0.535 0.407 0.463 0.486 0.557
Mtub21 1955 0.739 0.664 0.684 0.626 0.451
MIRU 20 2059 0.036 0 0.027 0.023 0.023
QUB11b 2163b 0.816 0.791 0.821 0.786 0.777
ETR‐A 2165 0.481 0.216 0.557 0.186 0.516
Mtub29 2347 0.152 0.216 0.132 0.147 0.184
Mtub30 2401 0.456 0.290 0.484 0.163 0.413
ETR‐B 2461 0.357 0.122 0.327 0.073 0.449
MIRU 23 2531 0.186 0 0.183 0.105 0.326
MIRU 24 2687 0.008 0.077 0 0.023 0
MIRU 26 2996 0.776 0.780 0.811 0.723 0.742
MIRU 27 3007 0.168 0.077 0.229 0.049 0.220
Mtub34 3171 0.105 0.122 0.132 0.091 0.169
MIRU 31 3192 0.584 0.459 0.583 0.379 0.600
Mtub39 3690 0.519 0.373 0.643 0.414 0.616
QUB26 4052 0.655 0.595 0.551 0.626 0.691
QUB4156 4156 0.548 0.626 0.516 0.607 0.221
MIRU 39 4348 0.607 0.626 0.597 0.591 0.384

3.4. Higher frequency of MDR‐TB strains in Beijing family

When we divided 430 MTB strains into three groups (drug‐sensitive TB, MDR‐TB, and SDR‐TB), the allelic diversity of each locus differed (Table 4). Consequently, the evaluation of each locus for allelic diversity varied. The statistic results showed significantly higher frequency of MDR‐TB in Beijing family than in non‐Beijing family (P = 0.032) (Table S1). However, no statistical difference in SDR‐TB frequency was identified between them.

4. DISCUSSION

TB is an ancient infectious disease, which remains as a global health problem. More than one million deaths from MTB infection is recorded worldwide every year.2 China experiences the highest TB and/or MDR‐TB burden in the world,18 which necessitates the prevention of MTB infection in Chinese population. MTB infection is one of the most serious infectious diseases in Yunnan, and the occurrence of drug‐resistant TB reached 37.91% in Yunnan MTB strains as reported by the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Investigation on the genetic diversity of clinical MTB is a key way to control the prevalence of MTB in Yunnan Province, but several studies are performed in Yunnan MTB strains.13, 21

Here, we first calculated the HGDI of the 12‐, 15‐, and 24‐locus MIRU‐VNTR, and the results showed similar HGDI for the 15‐ and 24‐locus MIRU‐VNTR, which was higher than that in the 12‐locus MIRU‐VNTR. However, the clustering rate showed a noticeable decrease of 26.28% (12‐locus vs 24‐locus) and 24.89% (15‐locus vs 24‐locus) in the 12‐locus MIRU‐VNTR. In addition, the lineages of MTB strains showed significant difference from the analysis between 12‐locus and 15‐locus/24‐locus MIRU‐VNTR. Thus, the 24‐locus MIRU‐VNTR was used for further analysis. A highly different allelic diversity was identified in 430 MTB strains, and about 86.05% (370/430) of which showed unique genotype by using the 24‐locus MIRU‐VNTR. Moreover, the MTB strains had a relatively higher diversity in this study than that in Jiangsu strains (78.50%, 204/260),22 Tibet strains (44.29%, 229/517),12 and the strains reported (65.31%, 177/271) in Yunnan Province.13 Therefore, the 24‐locus MIRU‐VNTR analysis should be preferred in research and in clinical applications over the 12‐ or 15‐locus method.

Similar to the results of Chen et al,13 the Beijing family is the dominant lineage in Yunnan clinical MTB strains. However, the proportion of Beijing family is 55.7% and 70.47% in Chen et al and in this study (P < 0.01), respectively. The MIRU10 and MIRU31 loci showed high diversity between the Beijing and non‐Beijing family (Table S2). The difference in two studies might be due to the use of different sample sizes and genotyping methods (only using the 12‐locus VNTR method in Chen et al). Although the frequency of Beijing family in our study was similar to that in Sichuan (69.28%),9 Chongqing (66.7%),14 and Zhejiang (71.6%),23 the other TB lineage expressed minor difference. In comparison with other countries, the frequency of Beijing family in Yunnan Province was notably higher than that in Vietnam (35%),24 Myanmar (32%),25 India (8%),26 Iran (7.1%),27 and Pakistan (3%)28 and was similar as that in Russia (67.9%),29 Japan (73.8%),11 and Korea (80%).30 The transmission of MTB strains between Yunnan Province and Southeast Asia might be limited. However, a strain belonging to the CAS lineage was first identified in this study. The mainly prevalent region of the CAS family was India,26 which was also reported in Tibet,12 Xinjiang,31 Jiangsu,22 and Gansu32 in China. The transmission way of CAS MTB strain into Yunnan remains unclear. Many factors could cause the spread of TB disease,31 such as trade, population migration, and tourism. Thus, the CAS lineage in Yunnan MTB strains might have come from other Chinese provinces.

Among the 74 drug‐resistant TB isolates, 36 (48.65%, 36/74) strains were SDR‐TB. The rate of MDR‐TB in total TB was 8.84% (38/430), which was higher than that in the national survey in 2007.33 A significantly higher proportion of MDR‐TB strains was identified in Beijing family (12.56%, 54/430) than that of non‐Beijing family (4.65%, 20/430) (P = 0.032), but the SDR‐TB strains showed a similar ratio. This result was consistent with a previous study.21 The high frequency of MDR‐TB in Beijing family might explain its easy global distribution.34, 35 The analysis of epidemic characteristics in MDR‐TB strains will aid the prevention of TB infection in the Yunnan population.

In conclusion, MTB strains showed high genetic diversity in Yunnan, China, and Beijing family was the dominant lineage in both total MTB and MDR‐TB strains. Although a MTB strain belonging to the CAS lineage was identified in this study, we could not interpret its transmission way. Thus, the more molecular genetic characteristics of MTB strains should be further studied.

Supporting information

 

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31460289), and Yunnan Science and Technology Commission (2015BC001 and 2015HC030).

Li D, Song Y, Yang P, Li X, Zhang A‐M, Xia X. Genetic diversity and drug resistance of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in Yunnan, China. J Clin Lab Anal. 2019;33:e22884 10.1002/jcla.22884

Contributor Information

A‐Mei Zhang, Email: zam1980@yeah.net.

Xueshan Xia, Email: oliverxia2000@aliyun.com.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Raman K, Yeturu K, Chandra N. targetTB: a target identification pipeline for Mycobacterium tuberculosis through an interactome, reactome and genome‐scale structural analysis. BMC Syst Biol. 2008;2:109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. World Health Organization . Global tuberculosis report 2017. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2017. [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Zhu S, Xia L, Yu S, Chen S, Zhang J. The burden and challenges of tuberculosis in China: findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. Sci Rep. 2017;7:14601. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Barnes PF, Cave MD. Molecular epidemiology of tuberculosis. N Engl J Med. 2003;349:1149‐1156. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Parwati I, van Crevel R, van Soolingen D. Possible underlying mechanisms for successful emergence of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis Beijing genotype strains. Lancet Infect Dis. 2010;10:103‐111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. van Soolingen D, Hermans PW, de Haas PE, Soll DR, van Embden JD. Occurrence and stability of insertion sequences in Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex strains: evaluation of an insertion sequence‐dependent DNA polymorphism as a tool in the epidemiology of tuberculosis. J Clin Microbiol. 1991;29:2578‐2586. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Mathema B, Kurepina NE, Bifani PJ, Kreiswirth BN. Molecular epidemiology of tuberculosis: current insights. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2006;19:658‐685. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Zhang D, An J, Wang Y, Pang Y. Genetic diversity of multidrug‐resistant tuberculosis in a resource‐limited region of China. Int J Infect Dis. 2014;29:7‐11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Zhao Y, Feng Q, Tang Ke, et al. The population structure of drug‐resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis clinical isolates from Sichuan in China. Infect Genet Evol. 2012;12:718‐724. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Supply P, Allix C, Lesjean S, et al. Proposal for standardization of optimized mycobacterial interspersed repetitive unit‐variable‐number tandem repeat typing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J Clin Microbiol. 2006;44:4498‐4510. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Murase Y, Mitarai S, Sugawara I, Kato S, Maeda S. Promising loci of variable numbers of tandem repeats for typing Beijing family Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J Med Microbiol. 2008;57:873‐880. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Dong H, Shi L, Zhao X, et al. Genetic diversity of Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates from Tibetans in Tibet, China. PLoS One. 2012;7:e33904. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Chen L, Pang Y, Ma L, et al. First Insight into the Molecular Epidemiology of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Isolates from the Minority Enclaves of Southwestern China. Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:2505172. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Zhang D, An J, Wang J, et al. Molecular typing and drug susceptibility of Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates from Chongqing Municipality, China. Infect Genet Evol. 2013;13:310‐316. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Yuan L, Huang Y, Mi Lg, et al. There is no correlation between sublineages and drug resistance of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Beijing/W lineage clinical isolates in Xinjiang, China. Epidemiol Infect. 2015;143:141‐149. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Hutchison C, Khan MS, Yoong J, Lin X, Coker RJ. Financial barriers and coping strategies: a qualitative study of accessing multidrug‐resistant tuberculosis and tuberculosis care in Yunnan, China. BMC Public Health. 2017;17:221. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Wang J, Liu Y, Zhang C‐l, et al. Genotypes and characteristics of clustering and drug susceptibility of Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates collected in Heilongjiang Province, China. J Clin Microbiol. 2011;49:1354‐1362. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Li D, Song Y, Zhang C‐L, Li X, Xia X, Zhang A‐M. Screening mutations in drug‐resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains in Yunnan, China. J Infect Public Health. 2017;10:630‐636. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Vadwai V, Shetty A, Supply P, Rodrigues C. Evaluation of 24‐locus MIRU‐VNTR in extrapulmonary specimens: study from a tertiary centre in Mumbai. Tuberculosis (Edinb). 2012;92:264‐272. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Sola C, Filliol I, Legrand E, et al. Genotyping of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex using MIRUs: association with VNTR and spoligotyping for molecular epidemiology and evolutionary genetics. Infect Genet Evol. 2003;3:125‐133. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Pang Y, Zhou Y, Zhao B, et al. Spoligotyping and drug resistance analysis of Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains from national survey in China. PLoS One. 2012;7:e32976. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Liu Q, Yang D, Xu W, et al. Molecular typing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates circulating in Jiangsu province, China. BMC Infect Dis. 2011;11:288. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Liu Z, Pang Y, Chen S, et al. A First Insight into the Genetic Diversity and Drug Susceptibility Pattern of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Complex in Zhejiang, China. Biomed Res Int. 2016;2016:8937539. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Buu TN, Huyen MN, Lan NT, et al. The Beijing genotype is associated with young age and multidrug‐resistant tuberculosis in rural Vietnam. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2009;13:900‐906. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Phyu S, Stavrum R, Lwin T, Svendsen OS, Ti T, Grewal H. Predominance of Mycobacterium tuberculosis EAI and Beijing lineages in Yangon, Myanmar . J Clin Microbiol. 2009;47:335‐344. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Singh UB, Suresh N, Bhanu NVijaya, et al. Predominant tuberculosis spoligotypes, Delhi, India. Emerg Infect Dis. 2004;10:1138‐1142. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Rohani M, Farnia P, Nasab MN, et al. Beijing genotype and other predominant Mycobacterium tuberculosis spoligotypes observed in Mashhad city, Iran. Indian J Med Microbiol. 2009;27:306‐310. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Tanveer M, Hasan Z, Siddiqui AR, et al. Genotyping and drug resistance patterns of M. tuberculosis strains in Pakistan. BMC Infect Dis. 2008;8:171. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Nikolaevskii VV, Balabanova Ia M, Brown T, Drobniewski FA, Fedorin IM. Molecular typing of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains circulating in central Russia: efficiency of spoligotyping and VNTR‐MIRU. Mol Gen Mikrobiol Virusol. 2005;9‐14. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Kang Hy, Wada T, Iwamoto T, et al. Phylogeographical particularity of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis Beijing family in South Korea based on international comparison with surrounding countries. J Med Microbiol. 2010;59:1191‐1197. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Dong H, Liu Z, Lv B, et al. Spoligotypes of Mycobacterium tuberculosis from different Provinces of China. J Clin Microbiol. 2010;48:4102‐4106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Liu J, Tong C, Liu J, et al. First insight into the genotypic diversity of clinical Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates from Gansu Province, China. PLoS One. 2014;9:e99357. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Yin Q‐Q, Jiao W‐W, Li Q‐J, et al. Prevalence and molecular characteristics of drug‐resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis in Beijing, China: 2006 versus 2012. BMC Microbiol. 2016;16:85. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. European Concerted Action on New Generation Genetic M, Techniques for the E, Control of T . Beijing/W genotype Mycobacterium tuberculosis and drug resistance. Emerg Infect Dis. 2006;12:736‐743. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Maltez F, Martins T, Povoas D, et al. Tuberculosis by strains of Beijing Family, in Patients from Lisbon, Portugal: Preliminary Report]. Acta Med Port. 2017;30:175‐184. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

 


Articles from Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES