Skip to main content
PMC home page
Journal of Medical Entomology logoLink to Journal of Medical Entomology
. 2019 Apr 10;56(4):1170–1175. doi: 10.1093/jme/tjz037

PCR-Based Bloodmeal Analysis of Aedes aegypti and Culex quinquefasciatus (Diptera: Culicidae) in St. George Parish, Grenada

Daniel M Fitzpatrick 1, Lindsey M Hattaway 1, Andy N Hsueh 1, Maria E Ramos-Niño 2, Sonia M Cheetham 1,✉
PMCID: PMC6595504  PMID: 31245825

Abstract

Blood-feeding patterns of mosquitoes affect the transmission and maintenance of arboviral diseases. In the Caribbean, Aedes aegypti (L.) and Culex quinquefasciatus Say mosquitoes are the dominant mosquito species in developed areas. However, no information is available on the bloodmeal hosts of these invasive vectors in Grenada, where arboviral pathogens such as dengue, chikungunya, and Zika viruses cause significant human suffering. To this end, Ae. aegypti and Cx. quinquefasciatus mosquitoes were investigated from five semirural locations near houses in St. George’s Parish, from 2017 to 2018. Polymerase chain reaction was conducted on DNA extracted from individual blood-fed mosquitoes using vertebrate-specific cytochrome b primers. The 32 Ae. aegypti bloodmeals included humans (70%), mongooses (18%), domestic dogs (6%), a domestic cat (3%), and an unidentified bird (3%). Thirty-seven Cx. quinquefasciatus mosquitoes took bloodmeals from seven species of birds (51%), humans (27%), domestic cats (8%), iguanas (5%), a domestic dog (3%), a rat (3%), and a common opossum (3%). The high percentage of human bloodmeal hosts in our study, especially by the normally anthropophilic Ae. aegypti, is expected. The bloodmeal sources and the percentage of nonhuman bloodmeals (30%) taken by Ae. aegypti are comparable to other studies. The large range of hosts may be explained in part by the semirural nature of most local housing. Accordingly, this may contribute to an exchange of pathogens between domestic, peridomestic, and sylvatic transmission cycles.

Keywords: Aedes aegypti, Culex, Grenada, bloodmeal analysis

From the perspective of medical and veterinary medicine, Aedes aegypti (L.) and Culex quinquefasciatus Say mosquitoes are two of the most important vector mosquitoes in the New World. Both were accidentally introduced to the Western hemisphere (Fonseca 2006, Powell and Tabachnick 2013), have become dominant species in urban environments throughout their range (Calderón-Arguedas et al. 2008, Medeiros-Sousa et al. 2017), and can ably adapt to rural and semirural environments (Chadee et al. 1998, Kweka et al. 2015).

Aedes aegypti is the primary vector of several important human pathogens that have become endemic to one or more Caribbean islands: all four serotypes of dengue virus, Zika virus, chikungunya virus, and yellow fever virus (Auguste et al. 2010, Gibson et al. 2016). They preferentially feed on humans throughout their introduced range (Powell and Tabachnick 2013), but bloodmeal analysis research demonstrates that they will feed on birds (e.g., chickens, mockingbirds) and other mammals (e.g., cats, dogs, horses, pigs, rabbits, raccoons, and rodents) in low abundance compared with humans (Ponlawat and Harrington 2005, Janssen et al. 2015, Garcia-Rejon et al. 2010, Sivan et al. 2015, Stenn et al. 2018). Furthermore, Ae. aegypti bloodmeal sources are more diverse in periurban/semirural environments than strictly urban settings (Sivan et al. 2015). While Ae. aegypti is typically considered a container-dwelling species in urban areas, Chadee et al. (1998) suggest that urban insecticide-based Ae. aegypti-targeted control programs and the semirural nature of many Caribbean islands may have contributed to selection for Ae. aegypti populations that are suited to both natural and man-made breeding sites. This impacts the transmission of pathogens whose sylvatic cycles are comparatively well understood (e.g., yellow fever or dengue in nonhuman primates) as well as pathogens that are considered emerging or re-emerging. For instance, over 40 Old World animal species, including mammals, reptiles, and birds, have tested positive for Zika via serology or virus isolation (Bueno et al. 2016, Vorou 2016), but to date, little is known about which vertebrate hosts play a role in Zika transmission cycles in the Americas.

Host preference studies in the New World have shown that Cx. quinquefasciatus mosquitoes are ornithophilic but will feed on a large range of hosts, including mammals and reptiles (Edman 1974, Molaei et al. 2007, Garcia-Rejon et al. 2010, Janssen et al. 2015, Stenn et al. 2018). While pathogens that are potentially transmitted by Cx. quinquefasciatus are either not endemic (e.g., St. Louis encephalitis virus [SLEV], Rift Valley fever virus, Wuchereria bancrofti) or are rarely reported (e.g., Oropouche virus, West Nile virus [WNV], and other equine encephalitis viruses) in most Caribbean islands, they infect people in the mainland Americas, and their introduction or re-emergence to Caribbean islands remain a concern (Chancey et al. 2015, Gibson et al. 2016). Furthermore, Culex mosquitoes are competent vectors of pathogens that affect peridomestic and wild animals as well. Over 100 native bird species have tested positive for WNV by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) or serology (Dusek et al. 2009, Center of Disease Control and Prevention 2019). Also, Cx. quinquefasciatus transmits Plasmodium relictum and Dirofialria immitis—the causative agents of avian malaria and canine/feline heartworm, respectively—both of which are prevalent in the Caribbean (Gibson et al. 2016, Soares et al. 2017).

Grenada represents an excellent location to examine the ecology and behavior of vector mosquitoes in a tropical island setting. Aedes aegypti and Cx. quinquefasciatus are very abundant in and around houses (Panagos et al. 2005). Human dengue cases occur annually in Grenada, and Zika and chikungunya epidemics have plagued the island nation recently (Panagos et al. 2005, Schiøler and Macpherson 2009, Macpherson et al. 2016, Brenciaglia et al. 2018). Much of Grenada consists of densely populated areas that are adjacent to forested regions with wild animals, and many locals own pets and livestock. Because wild and peridomestic animals may be reservoirs for human disease, this situation may facilitate the exchange of pathogens between domestic, peridomestic, and sylvatic transmission cycles. Mosquito host use and habitat choice vary considerably depending on geography, host availability, and seasonality, among many factors (Edman and Taylor 1968, Chadee et al. 1998, Kilpatrick et al. 2006, Thiemann et al. 2011, Saifur et al. 2012). Without knowing the feeding preferences of the populations of the mosquito species found in Grenada, we cannot be completely certain that these mosquitoes follow the patterns of the same species in other areas or what animals and humans may be at risk for pathogens they transmit. To this end, this study uses previously validated PCR techniques to identify the bloodmeals of Ae. aegypti and Cx. quinquefasciatus in Grenada.

Materials and Methods

Twice each week from October 2016 to January 2018, mosquitoes were captured at two to five houses in St. George Parish, Grenada (Figs. 1 and 2). For each site, one Biogents Sentinel (BG-S, Regensburg, Germany) trap baited with octenol and yeast-based carbon dioxide attractants (Aldridge et al. 2016) and three to five Biogents Gravid Aedes Traps (GAT) with 500-ml alfalfa infusion (Ritchie et al. 2014) were placed within 3 m of houses to attract mosquitoes. After 24 h, traps were collected, and mosquitoes were dispatched at −80°C. Subsequently, mosquitoes were identified to species by morphological analysis; because morphological keys that include recently introduced invasive taxa are not available for Grenada or Caribbean islands, Darsie and Ward (2005) and Lane (1953) were used to discriminate between species known to occur in Grenada according to the Walter Reed Biosystematics Unit (2019). Noticeably, engorged Ae. aegypti and Cx. quinquefasciatus females caught in BG-S traps and all Ae. aegypti caught in GAT traps were processed individually. Of the 15 sites sampled in St. George parish, mosquitoes captured from nine sites (Fig. 2) were used in this study. Because several hundred bloodfed Cx. quinquefasciatus were captured, subsets of mosquitoes from the dry season (March 2017), wet season (October 2017), and transitional periods between these seasons (January 2017 and January 2018) were used in subsequent analysis. Heads were removed using a sterile scalpel blade to prevent PCR inhibition (Beckmann et al. 2014). DNA was extracted using the QIAGEN DNEasy Blood and Tissue kit (Hilden, Germany). A 20-µl PCR with Platinum PCR SuperMix High Fidelity master mix (Thermofisher, Waltham, MA), 1.5-mM MgCl2, and ~50 ng extracted DNA was performed using 0.5 μM of primers from Boakye et al. (1999) that amplify an ~380 bp region of any vertebrate’s cytochrome b (cytb) mitochondrial gene using the following thermocycler conditions: 50 cycles of denaturation at 94°C for 30 s, annealing at 50°C for 45 s, and primer extension at 72°C for 30 s, with a final extension at 72°C for 10 min. Amplicons of expected size were extracted from gels using the QIAquick Gel Extraction Kit (Hilden, Germany) following the manufacturer’s protocol. Amplicons were sent to the Plant-Microbe Genomics Facility at The Ohio State University for direct Sanger sequencing. Raw sequence data were manually edited using Chromas 2.6.4 software and then compared with the sequence database using the NIH’s Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLAST) to determine percent identity to known cytb gene sequences.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Open in a new tab

Map of Grenada, West Indies. Map made with software on www.scribblemaps.com.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Open in a new tab

Map of collection sites in St. George Parish in the southwestern region of Grenada. Map made with software on www.scribblemaps.com.

Results

Of the 70 putative bloodmeals from Ae. aegypti mosquitoes that we processed and analyzed by PCR, 32 total bloodmeals—7 of 43 mosquitoes (16%) from the GAT traps and 25 of 27 mosquitoes (93%) from the BG-S traps—produced unambiguous sequence data for which the best matches were vertebrate cytb sequences (Table 1). The other samples did not produce bands in PCR analysis, failed to produce single readable sequences in the Sanger sequencing process, or were identified as off-target amplification of the mosquito host. Aedes aegypti bloodmeals that were identified came from five species: humans (70% of the identified bloodmeals), small Indian mongoose (Herpestes auropunctatus) (18%), domestic dogs (6%), a domestic cat (3%), and an unknown bird (3%). According to BLAST, the unknown bird bloodmeal sequence was 91% identical to several parrot species (Family Psittaculidae) not native to Grenada.

Table 1.

Bloodmeals from Ae. aegypti in Grenada

Order of bloodmeal host Closest match in GenBank Accession number of closest match Nucleotide identity Capture site Date
Mammalia Canis familiaris lupis Domestic dog DQ309764.1 274/274 100% A 20 Sep 2017
JX849650.1 170/174 98% B 25 Aug 2017
Felis catus Domestic cat AB194813.1 285/285 100% C 19 Jan 2017
Herpestes auropunctatus Small Indian mongoose FJ848672.1 278/279 99% B 5 Oct 2017
FJ848672.1 276/277 99% B 13 Oct 2017
FJ848672.1 272/273 99% B 13 Oct 2017
FJ848672.1 276/277 99% B 19 Oct 2017
FJ848672.1 277/277 100% B 20 Oct 2017
FJ848672.1 280/281 99% D 13 Oct 2017
Homo sapiens Human MG561401.1 278/279 99% A 24 Jan 2018
MG831412.1 282/282 100% B 24 Jan 2017
MG970575.2 295/295 100% B 25 Aug 2017
MG970575.2 291/291 100% B 1 Sep 2017
MG182042.1 283/284 99% B 15 Sep 2017
MG182042.1 279/279 100% B 15 Sep 2017
MG571220.1 280/280 100% B 28 Sep 2017
MG649328.1 278/279 99% B 28 Sep 2017
MG831412.1 279/279 100% B 31 Oct 2017
MG970575.2 285/285 100% C 18 Aug 2017
MG182042.1 278/279 99% C 22 Sep 2017
MG182042.1 279/279 100% C 14 Sep 2017
MG831412.1 279/279 100% C 29 Nov 2017
MF696072.1 278/279 99% E 14 Dec 2017
KP900938.1 278/278 100% E 27 Dec 2017
MG831412.1 279/280 99% E 12 Jan 2018
KX440321.1 279/279 100% E 24 Jan 2018
MH194581.1 274/274 100% F 2 Feb 2017
MG182027.1 278/279 99% G 14 Sep 2017
MG182042.1 279/279 100% G 22 Sep 2017
MG182042.1 278/279 99% G 22 Sep 2017
MG182042.1 269/276 97% G 31 Oct 2017
Aves Melopsittacus undulatus a Budgerigar parakeet AY724765.1 254/278 91% C 30 Nov 2017
Open in a new tab

a Melopsittacus undulatus, a parakeet, has not been reported in Grenada. No wild psittacid birds reported to live in Grenada (Lepage and Warnier 2014), but pet parrots are common, and migratory flocks of parrots are anecdotally reported.

Overall, of the 44 visibly engorged Cx. quinquefasciatus mosquitoes that were caught with BG-S traps and analyzed by PCR, 37 (84%) of the bloodmeals were identified (Table 2). The other seven samples either failed to amplify with the cytb primers or produced off-target amplification of the Cx. quinquefasciatus cytb gene. Thirteen host species were identified overall. Sixteen bloodmeals came from mammals: humans (27%), domestic cats (8%), a domestic dog (3%), a rat (Rattus rattus) (3%), and a common opossum (Didelphus marsupialis) (3%). Two reptilian bloodmeals were from green iguanas (Iguana iguana) (5%). Nineteen Cx. quinquefasciatus bloodmeals came from avian hosts, with best matches in GenBank were as follows: bananaquits (Coereba flaveola; 16%), curve-billed thrashers (Toxostoma curvirostre; 11%), black-faced grassquits (Tiaris bicolor; 11%), eared doves (Zenaida auriculata; 5%), a brown thrasher (Toxostoma rufum; 3%), a Lesser Antillean bullfinch (Loxigilla noctis; 3%), and a warbler (Setophaga striata; 3%).

Table 2.

Bloodmeals from Cx. quinquefasciatus in Grenada

Order of bloodmeal host Closest match in GenBank Accession number of closest match Nucleotide identity Capture site Date
Mammalia Canis lupis familiaris Domestic dog DQ309764.1 200/200 100% C 30 Mar 2017
Didelphus marsupialis Common opossum KT437726.1 275/277 99% C 27 Oct 2017
Felis catus Domestic cat AB194813.1 275/275 100% C 30 Mar 2017
KX348260.1 254/258 98% E 24 Jan 2017
KX348260.1 272/275 99% E 24 Jan 2017
Homo sapiens Human KY824954.1 263/264 99% C 2 Mar 2017
MH029820.1 242/242 100% E 23 Mar 2017
MG970575.2 277/277 100% C 20 Oct 2017
MG272941.1 278/278 100% D 18 Jan 2018
MH029820.1 278/279 99% B 25 Jan 2018
MH029820.1 280/280 100% B 25 Jan 2018
MH029820.1 280/281 99% B 25 Jan 2018
MH029820.1 283/283 100% B 25 Jan 2018
MH029820.1 279/279 100% B 25 Jan 2018
MH029820.1 281/281 100% B 25 Jan 2018
Rattus rattus Black rat KT232247.1 281/282 99% C 27 Oct 2017
Aves Coereba flaveola Bananaquit EF567840.1 274/275 99% C 15 Mar 2017
EF567840.1 272/273 99% C 16 Mar 2017
EF567853.1 260/260 100% C 16 Mar 2017
EF567853.1 273/275 99% C 16 Mar 2017
EF567853.1 276/277 99% A 27 Oct 2017
EF567853.1 271/271 100% B 11 Jan 2018
Loxigilla noctis Lesser Antillean bullfinch AF310041.1 276/276 100% A 27 Oct 2017
Setophaga striata a Blackpoll warbler EU815688.1 264/282 94% D 20 Oct 2017
Tiaris bicolor Black-faced grassquit AF489899.1 278/279 99% C 10 Mar 2017
AF489899.1 278/281 99% C 30 Mar 2017
AF489899.1 282/282 100% A 27 Oct 2017
KJ945367.1 267/278 96% A 19 Jan 2018
Toxostoma curvirostre b Curve-billed thrasher AF287548.1 268/279 96% A 20 Oct 2017
AF287548.1 272/283 96% A 27 Oct 2017
AF287548.1 272/283 96% A 27 Oct 2017
AF287548.1 272/282 96% D 27 Oct 2017
Toxostoma rufum b Brown thrasher AF130237.2 265/279 95% I 9 Mar 2017
Zenaida auriculata Eared dove HM640211.1 102/102 100% A 16 Oct 2017
HM640211.1 280/280 100% C 25 Jan 2018
Reptilia Iguana iguana Green iguana KX610610.1 212/226 94% D 17 Jan 2018
KX610610.1 272/279 97% E 18 Jan 2018
Open in a new tab

aThe 94% identity matched to Setophaga striata suggests a close but incorrect identification. There are several Setophaga species and other warblers in Grenada without cytb sequence entries in GenBank that are probably the source.

bFive bloodmeals ostensibly came from two Toxostoma species (Family: Mimidae). However, only four mimid species occur in Grenada: Allenia fusca (scaly breasted thrasher), Cinclocerthia ruficauda (brown trembler), Margarops fuscatus (pearly eyed thrasher), and Mimus gilvus (tropical mockingbird) (Lepage and Warnier 2014). Of these, only C. ruficauda and M. fuscatus have cytb sequence entries in GenBank, and these entries have 94% identity or less to the five bloodmeal PCR sequences identified as Toxostoma, suggesting that other birds served as bloodmeal sources.

Discussion

Generally, our results show that the host preference patterns of Ae. aegypti and Cx. quinquefasciatus in Grenada are similar to other areas of the world. Humans were the most common bloodmeal source for both mosquito species, but both were willing to feed on other synanthropic and wild animals, which may allow for zoonotic pathogen spillover opportunities. Interestingly, we noted a considerable difference between the percentage of bloodmeals that could be identified from Ae. aegypti mosquitoes caught with BG-S traps (93%) and those caught in GAT traps (19%). We attribute this to the nature of the mosquitoes caught; only noticeably engorged Ae. aegypti from the BG-S traps were assayed, whereas all Ae. aegypti mosquitoes caught in the GAT traps, regardless of state of engorgement, were analyzed by PCR.

All but one of best matches for the host species identified from Ae. aegypti bloodmeals are found in Grenada, supporting the molecular identifications (Table 1). Aedes aegypti are considered highly anthropophagic, often living in close proximity to humans. Consistent with this, nonhuman bloodmeals comprised a minority of positive bloodmeal identifications in this study (30%). This is considerably higher than in some studies (Ponlawat and Harrington 2005 [1%], Stenn et al. 2018 [13%]), comparable to several other studies (Janssen et al. 2009 [25%], Sivan et al. 2015 [22% in areas with medium vegetation], Khaklang and Kittayapong 2014 [30%]), and lower than one study (Tempelis et al. 1970 [46%]). We identified Ae. aegypti (as well as Cx. quinquefasciatus) bloodmeals derived from domestic cats and dogs, which implicate them these mosquitoes as Dirofilaria immitis vectors (Brito et al. 1999, Tiawsirisup and Nithiuthai 2006). Interestingly, the percentage of Ae. aegypti bloodmeals from mongooses (Herpestes auropunctatus) was much higher than expected. Introduced more than 100-yr ago, mongooses are now highly abundant on the island due to high reproductive rates and lack of predators, so the results are not surprising (Nellis and Everard 1983). However, all mongoose bloodmeals were taken in same month (October 2017), and five of six were collected from a single site (Table 1); a clear explanation of this phenomenon is not possible at this time. Little is known about the status of mongooses as a reservoir of dengue, chikungunya, or Zika viruses. Granted that our study had a small sample size, the high percentage of mongoose-derived bloodmeals warrants further investigation into their competence as arboviral reservoir hosts.

The best host matches for 32 of 37 Cx. quinquefasciatus bloodmeals have been reported in Grenada (Table 2). Culex quinquefasciatus have a wide host preference range in Grenada, which is consistent with other studies (Garcia-Rejon et al. 2010, Janssen et al. 2015, Stenn et al. 2018). Normally considered an ornithophagic mosquito, Cx. quinquefasciatus took more bloodmeals from humans than any other species in this study. Janssen et al. (2015) also observed high rates of human-derived bloodmeals when trapping Cx. quinquefasciatus in and around houses in two Mexican cities. This study’s results, like theirs, imply that the proximity to houses likely contributed to abnormally high rates of human-derived bloodmeals. Regardless, the diversity of bloodmeals—51% from wild avian hosts, 43% from mammalian hosts, and 5% from reptilian hosts—suggests that, like in much of the world, Cx. quinquefasciatus can act as an important potential bridge vector between domestic, peridomestic, and sylvatic arboviral transmission cycles when pathogens are present. Viremic cases of WNV are very rarely reported in humans or animals in Caribbean island nations (Gibson et al. 2016). However, several avian bloodmeal sources in this study have previously tested positive for WNV exposure by viral isolation or by serology (Dupuis et al. 2005, Bosch et al. 2007, Dusek et al. 2009, Center of Disease Control and Prevention 2019).

Aedes aegypti is the sole Aedes species mosquito in Grenada and is traditionally considered the primary local vector of dengue, chikungunya, and Zika viruses. Our finding that Ae. aegypti took a majority (70%) of total blood meals from humans supports incrimination of this species in transmission of these arboviruses in Grenada. Our finding that Cx. quinquefasciatus in Grenada feeds upon both avian and mammalian hosts in roughly equivalent percentages has important implications for transmission of pathogens that utilize birds as reservoir hosts (e.g., equine encephalitis viruses). While the competence of Cx. quinquefasciatus as a vector of Zika virus is still being debated (Guo et al. 2016, Epelboin et al. 2017, van den Hurk et al. 2017, Smartt et al. 2018), no other human pathogens definitively transmitted by Culex spp. mosquitoes have been reported in Grenada. However, our data imply that Grenada has efficacious bridge vectors in abundance if those pathogens are introduced. These data are part of a larger study on arboviral disease ecology and surveillance in Grenada. PCR-based detection of arboviral pathogens in human-associated and wild animals as well as in the mosquito species investigated in this study is underway. By elucidating the host preferences of these and other species of mosquitoes, our study contributes to a growing body of work on the transmission cycles of the arboviruses of human and veterinary concern in the Caribbean.

Acknowledgments

We thank Mr. Andrew Kushnir and Ms. Jaelene Haynes for their assistance with mosquito identification and field work. This research was funded by The Windward Islands Research and Education Foundation’s One Health Research Initiative Grant 07-16-3.

References Cited

  1. Aldridge R. L., Britch S. C., Allan S. A., Tsikolia M., Calix L. C., Bernier U. R., and Linthicum K. J.. . 2016. Comparison of volatiles and mosquito capture efficacy for three carbohydrate sources in a yeast-fermentation CO2 generator. J. Am. Mosq. Control Assoc. 32: 282–291. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Auguste A. J., Lemey P., Pybus O. G., Suchard M. A., Salas R. A., Adesiyun A. A., Barrett A. D., Tesh R. B., Weaver S. C., and Carrington C. V.. . 2010. Yellow fever virus maintenance in Trinidad and its dispersal throughout the Americas. J. Virol. 84: 9967–9977. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Beckmann J. F., and Fallon A. M.. . 2014. Decapitation improves detection of Wolbachia pipientis (Rickettsiales: Anaplasmataceae) in Culex pipiens (Diptera: Culicidae) mosquitoes by the polymerase chain reaction. J. Med. Entomol. 49: 1103–1108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Boakye D. A., Tang J., Truc P., Merriweather A., and Unnasch T. R.. . 1999. Identification of bloodmeals in haematophagous diptera by cytochrome B heteroduplex analysis. Med. Vet. Entomol. 13: 282–287. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bosch I., Herrera F., Navarro J. C., Lentino M., Dupuis A., Maffei J., Jones M., Fernández E., Pérez N., Pérez-Emán J., . et al. 2007. West Nile virus, Venezuela. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 13: 651–653. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Brenciaglia M., Noël T. P., Fields P. J., Bidaisee S., Myers T. E., Nelson W. M., Venkateswaran N., Venkateswaran K., Parameswaran N., Bahadoor A., . et al. 2018. Clinical, serological, and molecular observations from a case series study during the Asian lineage Zika virus outbreak in Grenada during 2016. Can. J. Infect. Dis. Med. Microbiol. 2018: 4635647. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Brito A. C., Fontes G., Rocha E. M., Rocha D. A., and Regis L.. . 1999. Development of Dirofilaria immitis (Leidy) in Aedes aegypti (L.) and Culex quinquefasciatus (say) from Maceió, Alagoas, Brazil. Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz. 94: 575–576. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Bueno M. G., Martinez N., Abdalla L., Santos C. N. D. D., and Chame M.. . 2016. Animals in the Zika virus life cycle: what to expect from megadiverse Latin American countries. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 10: e0005073. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Calderón-Arguedas O., Troyo A., Solano M. E., Avendaño A., and Beier J. C.. . 2008. Urban mosquito species (Diptera: Culicidae) of dengue endemic communities in the Greater Puntarenas area, Costa Rica. Rev. Biol. Trop. 57: 1223. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2019. Species of dead birds in which West Nile virus has been detected, United States, 1999–2016 CDC, Atlanta, GA: Available from https://www.cdc.gov/westnile/resources/pdfs/BirdSpecies1999-2016.pdf [Google Scholar]
  11. Chadee D. D., Ward R. A., and Novak R. J.. . 1998. Natural habitats of Aedes aegypti in the Caribbean—a review. J. Am. Mosq. Control Assoc. 14: 5–11. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Chancey C., Grinev A., Volkova E., and Rios M.. . 2015. The global ecology and epidemiology of West Nile virus. Biomed Res. Int. 2015: 376230. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Darsie R. F., and Ward R. A.. . 2005. Identification and geographical distribution of the mosquitoes of North America, north of Mexico. University Press of Florida, Gainesville, FL. [Google Scholar]
  14. Dupuis A. P. II, Marra P. P., Reitsma R., Jones M. J., Louie K. L., and Kramer L. D.. . 2005. Serologic evidence for West Nile virus transmission in Puerto Rico and Cuba. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 73: 474–476. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Dusek R. J., McLean R. G., Kramer L. D., Ubico S. R., Dupuis A. P. II, Ebel G. D., and Guptill S. C.. . 2009. Prevalence of West Nile virus in migratory birds during spring and fall migration. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 81: 1151–1158. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Edman J. D. 1974. Host-feeding patterns of Florida mosquitoes. 3. Culex (Culex) and Culex (Neoculex). J. Med. Entomol. 11: 95–104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Edman J. D., and Taylor D. J.. . 1968. Culex nigripalpus: seasonal shift in the bird-mammal feeding ratio in a mosquito vector of human encephalitis. Science. 161: 67–68. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Epelboin Y., Talaga S., Epelboin L., and Dusfour I.. . 2017. Zika virus: an updated review of competent or naturally infected mosquitoes. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 11: e0005933. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Fonseca D. M., Smith J. L., Wilkerson R. C., and Fleischer R. C.. . 2006. Pathways of expansion and multiple introductions illustrated by large genetic differentiation among worldwide populations of the southern house mosquito. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 74: 284–289. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Garcia-Rejon J. E., Blitvich B. J., Farfan-Ale J. A., Loroño-Pino M. A., Chim W. A. C., Flores-Flores L. F., Rosado-Paredes E., Baak-Baak C., Perez-Mutul J., Suarez-Solis V., . et al. 2010. Host-feeding preference of the mosquito, Culex quinquefasciatus, in Yucatan State, Mexico. J. Insect Sci. 10: 1–12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Gibson K. E., Fitzpatrick D. M., Stone D., Noel T. P., and MacPherson C. N. L.. . 2016. Vector-borne diseases in the Caribbean: history and current status. CAB Rev. 11: 1–28. [Google Scholar]
  22. Guo X. X., Li C. X., Deng Y. Q., Xing D., Liu Q. M., Wu Q., Sun A. J., Dong Y. D., Cao W. C., Qin C. F., . et al. 2016. Culex pipiens quinquefasciatus: a potential vector to transmit Zika virus. Emerg. Microbes Infect. 5: e102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. van den Hurk A. F., Hall-Mendelin S., Jansen C. C., and Higgs S.. . 2017. Zika virus and Culex quinquefasciatus mosquitoes: a tenuous link. Lancet. Infect. Dis. 17: 1014–1016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. C., Jansen C., E. Webb, C., C. Graham, G., B. Craig, S., Zborowski, P., A. Ritchie, S., C. Russel, R., F. van den Hurk. A. 2009. Blood sources of mosquitoes collected from urban and peri-urban environments in eastern Australia with species-specific molecular analysis of avian blood meals. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 81: 849–857. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Janssen N., Fernandez-Salas I., Díaz González E. E., Gaytan-Burns A., Medina-de la Garza C. E., Sanchez-Casas R. M., Börstler J., Cadar D., Schmidt-Chanasit J., and Jöst H.. . 2015. Mammalophilic feeding behaviour of Culex quinquefasciatus mosquitoes collected in the cities of Chetumal and Cancun, Yucatán Peninsula, Mexico. Trop. Med. Int. Health. 20: 1488–1491. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Khaklang, S., & Kittayapong, P. . 2014. Species composition and blood meal analysis of mosquitoes collected from a tourist island, Koh Chang, Thailand. J. Vector Ecol., 39: 448–453. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Kilpatrick A. M., Kramer L. D., Jones M. J., Marra P. P., and Daszak P.. . 2006. West Nile virus epidemics in North America are driven by shifts in mosquito feeding behavior. PLoS Biol. 4: e82. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Kweka E. J., Munga S., Himeidan Y., Githeko A. K., and Yan G.. . 2015. Assessment of mosquito larval productivity among different land use types for targeted malaria vector control in the western Kenya highlands. Parasit. Vectors. 8: 356. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Lane J. 1953. Neotropical culicidae, vols. 1 and 2 Universidad de São Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil. [Google Scholar]
  30. Lepage D., and Warnier J.. . 2014. The Peters’ check-list of the birds of the world (1931–1987) database Available from http://avibase.bsc-eoc.org/peterschecklist.jsp
  31. Macpherson C., Noël T., Fields P., Jungkind D., Yearwood K., Simmons M., Widjaja S., Mitchell G., Noel D., Bidaisee S., . et al. 2016. Clinical and serological insights from the Asian lineage chikungunya outbreak in Grenada, 2014: an observational study. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 95: 890–893. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Medeiros-Sousa A. R., Fernandes A., Ceretti-Junior W., Wilke A. B. B., and Marrelli M. T.. . 2017. Mosquitoes in urban green spaces: using an island biogeographic approach to identify drivers of species richness and composition. Sci. Rep. 7: 17826. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Molaei G., Andreadis T. G., Armstrong P. M., Bueno R. Jr, Dennett J. A., Real S. V., Sargent C., Bala A., Randle Y., Guzman H., . et al. 2007. Host feeding pattern of Culex quinquefasciatus (Diptera: Culicidae) and its role in transmission of West Nile virus in Harris County, Texas. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 77: 73–81. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Nellis D. W., and Everard C. O. R.. . 1983. The biology of the mongoose in the Caribbean, pp. 1–162. InHummenlinck P. W. and Van der Steed L. J. (eds.), Studies on the fauna of Curacao and other Caribbean Islands. Foundation for the Scientific Research in Surinam and the Netherlands Antilles, Utrecht, the Netherlands. [Google Scholar]
  35. Panagos A., Lacy E. R., Gubler D. J., and Macpherson C. N.. . 2005. Dengue in Grenada. Rev. Panam. Salud Publica. 17: 225–229. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Ponlawat A., and Harrington L. C.. . 2005. Blood feeding patterns of Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus in Thailand. J. Med. Entomol. 42: 844–849. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Powell J. R., and Tabachnick W. J.. . 2013. History of domestication and spread of Aedes aegypti—a review. Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz. 108 (Suppl 1): 11–17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Ritchie S. A., Buhagiar T. S., Townsend M., Hoffmann A., Van Den Hurk A. F., McMahon J. L., and Eiras A. E.. . 2014. Field validation of the gravid Aedes trap (GAT) for collection of Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae). J. Med. Entomol. 51: 210–219. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Saifur R. G., Dieng H., Hassan A. A., Salmah M. R., Satho T., Miake F., and Hamdan A.. . 2012. Changing domesticity of Aedes aegypti in northern peninsular Malaysia: reproductive consequences and potential epidemiological implications. PLoS One. 7: e30919. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Schiøler K. L., and MacPherson C. N. L.. . 2009. Dengue transmission in the small-island setting: investigations from the Caribbean island of Grenada. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 81: 280–286. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Sivan A., Shriram A. N., Sunish I. P., and Vidhya P. T.. . 2015. Host-feeding pattern of Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae) in heterogeneous landscapes of South Andaman, Andaman and Nicobar Islands, India. Parasitol. Res. 114: 3539–3546. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Smartt C. T., Shin D., Kang S., and Tabachnick W. J.. . 2018. Culex quinquefasciatus (Diptera: Culicidae) from Florida transmitted zika virus. Front. Microbiol. 9: 768. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Soares L., Marra P., Gray L., and Ricklefs R. E.. . 2017. The malaria parasite Plasmodium relictum in the endemic avifauna of eastern Cuba. Conserv. Biol. 31: 1477–1482. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Stenn T., Peck K. J., Rocha Pereira G., and Burkett-Cadena N. D.. . 2018. Vertebrate hosts of Aedes aegypti, Aedes albopictus, and Culex quinquefasciatus (Diptera: Culicidae) as potential vectors of Zika virus in Florida. J. Med. Entomol. 56: 10–17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Tempelis C. H., Hayes R. O., Hess A. D., and Reeves W. C.. . 1970. Blood-feeding habits of four species of mosquito found in Hawaii. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 19: 335–341. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Thiemann T. C., Wheeler S. S., Barker C. M., and Reisen W. K.. . 2011. Mosquito host selection varies seasonally with host availability and mosquito density. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 5: e1452. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Tiawsirisup S., and Nithiuthai S.. . 2006. Vector competence of Aedes aegypti (L.) and Culex quinquefasciatus (Say) for Dirofilaria immitis (Leidy). Southeast Asian J. Trop. Med. Public Health. 37(Suppl 3): 110–114. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Vorou R. 2016. Zika virus, vectors, reservoirs, amplifying hosts, and their potential to spread worldwide: what we know and what we should investigate urgently. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 48: 85–90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Walter Reed Biosystematics Unit 2019. Systematic catalog of Culicidae. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC: Available from http://www.mosquitocatalog.org/ [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Medical Entomology are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES