Skip to main content
Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine logoLink to Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine
. 2019 Jun 26;7(6):2325967119849579. doi: 10.1177/2325967119849579

Understanding Preoperative Demographics and Risk Factors for Early Revision Surgery in Patients Undergoing Hip Arthroscopic Surgery: A Large Database Study

Miranda J Rogers *, Temitope F Adeyemi *, Jaewhan Kim , Travis G Maak *,
PMCID: PMC6595673  PMID: 31263723

Abstract

Background:

Hip arthroscopic surgery has become an increasingly common surgical technique to diagnose and treat various hip abnormalities. While increased efficacy has been reported, debate remains regarding appropriate surgical indications. Multiple factors including patient demographics, surgical procedure, and underlying disease have been associated with poor surgical outcomes. Preoperative diagnostic and treatment interventions including physical therapy and injections may affect surgical indications and outcomes.

Purpose:

To identify patient characteristics and preoperative factors associated with an increased risk of early revision surgery and/or extended postoperative medical care after index hip arthroscopic surgery.

Study Design:

Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods:

Utah’s All Payer Claims Database, a state-mandated registry containing data from all payers, including private insurance, Medicare Advantage, and Medicaid, was queried to identify patients who underwent hip arthroscopic surgery during a 3-year period (January 1, 2013, to December 31, 2015). Demographics, comorbidities, nonoperative care modalities, pain medications, and revision procedures were collected using claims data at 6 months preoperatively and 12 months postoperatively.

Results:

A total of 1283 patients who underwent primary hip arthroscopic surgery were analyzed, of whom 57.6% (n = 739) were female. Within 1 year of index surgery, 7.8% and 2.1% of patients underwent revision hip arthroscopic surgery and conversion to total hip arthroplasty (THA), respectively. Patients older than 60 years and male patients were more likely to undergo revision arthroscopic surgery (odds ratio [OR], 0.89; P < .001 and OR, 1.59; P = .04, respectively) and convert to THA (OR, 1.03; P = .01 and OR, 2.25; P = .05, respectively). Preoperative opioid use was significantly associated with increased odds of revision surgery (OR, 1.64; P = .05) and THA (OR, 2.70; P = .03). No significant relationship existed between preoperative physical therapy or intra-articular hip injections and revision hip arthroscopic surgery (OR, 1.20; P = .45 and OR, 1.18; P = .52, respectively) or conversion to THA (OR, 0.89; P = .79 and OR, 0.71; P = .46, respectively).

Conclusion:

This study showed that predictable patient factors can effectively guide preoperative decision making and may improve prognosis. Certain patient pools require optimization preoperatively, and a subset of patients appears to require additional surgical indications.

Keywords: hip arthroscopic surgery, revision surgery, large database study, patient prognostic factors


Hip arthroscopic surgery allows the treatment of many hip abnormalities, including femoroacetabular impingement (FAI), chondral defects, labral tears, and loose bodies, among others.1,17,20,26,34 Despite the steep learning curve, its minimally invasive nature, low complication rate, and quick recovery have led to a rapid increase in utilization over the past 10 years.4,8,23,25,29,36 While good efficacy and increased patient satisfaction occur in many populations,8 the debate continues regarding surgical indications.8,26 Poor outcomes include revision hip arthroscopic surgery, limited function, continued pain, and conversion to total hip arthroplasty (THA).35,37 Negative predictors include specific demographics and procedures performed, workers’ compensation status, persistent structural abnormalities, labral deficiency, chondral damage, capsular instability, and preoperative osteoarthritis.4,7,30,32,35

Preoperative physical therapy (PT) and diagnostic intra-articular (IA) injections have been identified as potential prognostic indicators. Insurers frequently require preoperative PT for approval, suggesting a perceived importance for surgical indications, despite a paucity of supporting data. In a small, randomized controlled pilot study, patients diagnosed with FAI were randomized to 7 weeks of supervised exercise with manual therapy versus activity modification counseling and a home exercise program.45 Both cohorts reported significant improvements in pain and range of motion, suggesting that some hip abnormalities may be amenable to conservative management.45 However, this study concluded that while PT may improve short-term pain and function, it does not address the underlying osseous morphology. This was supported by larger randomized clinical trial data suggesting that while PT can improve symptoms, hip arthroscopic surgery had more significant, clinically important improvements.15

Imaging-guided IA injections may also assist surgical decision making, including the evaluation of IA versus extra-articular hip pain sources. In fact, some insurance guidelines also require these injections for approval, with guidelines based on data demonstrating that a negative response to an IA injection may be associated with a poor surgical outcome.3 Thus, over 80% of patients undergoing hip arthroscopic surgery report receiving IA injections before surgery.21 However, studies have contradicted these findings,22 and minimal data exist correlating preoperative IA injections to increased postoperative revision or care.

The goals of this study were to identify demographic variables, comorbidities, and preoperative evaluation modalities (PT, IA injection) that may be associated with early revision hip arthroscopic surgery, conversion to THA, other surgical procedures, extended medical care, and prolonged pain medication usage after index hip arthroscopic surgery.

Methods

With institutional review board (#98713) approval, Utah’s All Payer Claims Database (APCD) was queried to include a 3-year period between January 1, 2013, and December 31, 2015. Patients were identified using Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes and included if they were ≥14 years old, continuously insured, and had claims information at 6 months preoperatively and 12 months postoperatively. Utah’s APCD is a state-mandated registry that contains claims data from all private and public payers (Medicare Advantage and Medicaid), representing 2.4 million persons and 80% of Utah’s population beginning in the year 2013.41,43 The APCD provided 3-year longitudinal data, affording the ability to correlate large-volume preoperative factors with postoperative management in a fashion not available with other hip arthroscopic surgery studies using a large database.19

With the date of surgery as the index date, common diagnostic indicators and conservative interventions were collected at 6 months preoperatively and 12 months postoperatively using CPT codes (Appendix Table A1). Revision hip arthroscopic surgery, conversion to THA, lumbosacral surgery, and abdominal surgery were included to capture procedures that could indicate a failure of the index surgery to satisfactorily relieve symptoms. The concern was that patients who underwent abdominal or lumbosacral surgery shortly after the index arthroscopic surgery were not properly diagnosed before the initial arthroscopic procedure was performed. Preoperative and postoperative PT, IA hip injections, epidural/facet lumbosacral injections, and pain medications (opioids, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs [NSAIDs], and skeletal muscle relaxants) were also identified and analyzed using CPT codes, National Drug Code data, and medication names.

Baseline demographic data, insurance type, urban or rural regional designation indicating where the patient lived at the time of surgery, and comorbidities were identified. Age was measured in years at index surgery, and age squared was included in the regression models because of a significant nonlinear trend in this variable’s effect on postoperative interventions. Sex was dichotomized as male or female. Comorbidities were binary and identified based on International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9), codes (Appendix Table A1). Insurance type was categorized as commercial/private or government funded (Medicaid or Medicare). Patients with dual Medicaid/Medicare enrollment (n = 11) were excluded from the analysis.

Descriptive statistics, including means, standard deviations, frequencies, and percentages, were used to describe the sample. To identify factors that were associated with the outcomes, multivariate logistic regression was used, and odds ratios (ORs) and P values were reported in the regression table. The significance level was set at .05 for all analyses using Stata statistical software (v 14; StataCorp).

Results

The analyzed sample included 3443 patients who underwent hip arthroscopic surgery between January 1, 2013, and December 31, 2015. Patients were excluded from the final analysis for the following reasons: lacked 1-year follow-up data after index surgery (n = 1030), were not continuously enrolled in insurance during the study period (n = 1028), were missing demographic data (n = 68), or were younger than 14 years at the time of index surgery (n = 34).

A total of 1283 patients who underwent primary hip arthroscopic surgery, 57.6% (n = 739) female and 42.4% (n = 544) male, were included in the final analysis (Table 1). Patients were more likely to have private insurance than Medicare or Medicaid (89.1% vs 10.9%, respectively) and live in urban rather than rural regions (88.5% vs 11.5%, respectively). Common comorbidities, identified by ICD-9 codes, included depression (23.3%), smoking (11.9%), obesity (11.6%), and diabetes (10.0%) (Table 2).

TABLE 1.

Patient Demographics (N = 1283)

Patient Cohort, n (%) Utah, %a
Sex
 Male 544 (42.4) 50.3
 Female 739 (57.6) 49.7
Age at surgery, mean ± SD (range) or median, y 43.3 ± 17.4 (14-87) 30.5
Region
 Rural 147 (11.5) 9.4
 Urban 1136 (88.5) 90.5
Type of insurance
 Medicaid/Medicare 140 (10.9) 21.0
 Private 1143 (89.1) 67.8

aRepresentative percentages or median (for age) in the state of Utah.38,39,42

TABLE 2.

Comorbidities

Patient Cohort, % Utah, %a
Depression 23.3 21.1
Smoking 11.9 9.6
Obesity 11.6 25.6
Diabetes 10.0 7.7

aRepresentative percentages in the state of Utah.40

Of the patients included, 7.8% underwent revision arthroscopic surgery, and 2.1% converted to THA within 1 year of hip arthroscopic surgery. Additionally, 2.4% and 1.2% of patients underwent lumbosacral surgery and abdominal surgery, respectively, within 1 year of hip arthroscopic surgery (Table 3).

TABLE 3.

Additional Surgical Interventions

n (%)
Revision hip arthroscopic surgery 100 (7.8)
Total hip arthroplasty 27 (2.1)
Lumbosacral surgery 30 (2.4)
Abdominal surgery 15 (1.2)

Injections were prevalent in the preoperative and postoperative settings (46.7% and 34.3%, respectively). IA hip injections were most common, with 45.1% and 29.5% of patients receiving at least 1 injection preoperatively and postoperatively, respectively. Lumbosacral epidural or facet joint injections increased from 1.6% preoperatively to 4.8% postoperatively (Table 4).

TABLE 4.

Preoperative and Postoperative Conservative Interventionsa

≤6 mo Preoperatively 2-3 mo Postoperatively 4-6 mo Postoperatively 7-9 mo Postoperatively 10-12 mo Postoperatively Overall Postoperative Period
Injections (overall) 599 (46.7) 117 (9.1) 155 (12.1) 145 (11.3) 118 (9.2) 440 (34.3)
 Intra-articular hip injection 578 (45.1) 101 (7.9) 133 (10.4) 129 (10.1) 97 (7.6) 379 (29.5)
 Epidural/facet lumbosacral injection 21 (1.6) 16 (1.3) 22 (1.7) 16 (1.3) 21 (1.6) 61 (4.8)
Physical therapy
 Yes 411 (32.0) 709 (55.3) 380 (29.6) 223 (17.4) 164 (12.8) 994 (77.5)
 No 872 (68.0) 574 (44.7) 903 (70.4) 1060 (82.6) 1119 (87.2) 289 (22.5)
Prescriptions
 Opioid 441 (34.4) 297 (23.2) 240 (18.7) 233 (18.2) 211 (16.5) 1007 (78.5)
 NSAID 337 (26.3) 196 (15.3) 183 (14.3) 163 (12.7) 154 (12.0) 647 (50.4)
 Steroid 134 (10.4) 72 (5.6) 70 (5.5) 67 (5.2) 162 (4.8) 239 (18.6)
 Skeletal muscle relaxant 123 (9.6) 65 (5.1) 80 (6.2) 67 (5.2) 84 (6.6) 184 (14.3)

aData are reported as n (%). NSAID, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug.

Preoperative PT occurred in 32.0% of patients. Extended postoperative PT occurred in 29.6% and 12.8% of patients at 4 to 6 months and 10 to 12 months, respectively. Pain medications were routinely prescribed preoperatively, with 34.4% of patients receiving opioids, 26.3% receiving NSAIDs, 10.4% receiving steroids, and 9.6% receiving skeletal muscle relaxants. Continued postoperative use of prescription opioids and NSAIDs, in particular, remained common, with 18.7% of patients still receiving opioids and 14.3% receiving NSAIDs at 4 to 6 months and 16.5% and 12.0% of patients receiving opioids and NSAIDs at 10 to 12 months, respectively (Table 4).

Both demographics and comorbidities demonstrated significant associations with postoperative interventions. As previously mentioned, the effect of age on postoperative interventions was nonlinear. Age (OR, 0.89; P < .001) and age squared (OR, 1.01 [95% CI, 1.000128-1.00167]; P = .02) indicated that as patients aged, they were significantly less likely to undergo revision arthroscopic surgery, but a threshold effect occurred at age 60 years, after which patients were significantly more likely to undergo revision arthroscopic surgery. Older age was associated with increased odds of conversion to THA (OR, 1.03 [95% CI, 1.0076-1.0613]; P = .01), lumbosacral surgery (OR, 1.03 [95% CI, 1.0043-1.0615]; P = .02), and abdominal surgery (OR, 1.38; P = .01). Male patients were more likely than female patients to undergo both revision arthroscopic surgery (OR, 1.59; P = .04) and conversion to THA (OR, 2.25; P = .05). Obese patients were significantly more likely to convert to THA (OR, 3.40; P = .02), and diabetic patients were significantly more likely to undergo lumbosacral surgery (OR, 3.60; P = .01).

Preoperative opioid use was the only medication found to be associated with increased odds of revision arthroscopic surgery (OR, 1.64; P = .05), THA (OR, 2.70; P = .03), and lumbosacral surgery (OR, 2.44; P = .04). The utilization of preoperative conservative treatments such as PT and injections was not significant (Table 5).

TABLE 5.

Results of Multivariate Logistic Regressiona

Revision Hip Arthroscopic Surgery Total Hip Arthroplasty Lumbosacral Surgery Abdominal Surgery
OR P Value OR P Value OR P Value OR P Value
Age 0.89 <.001b 1.03 .01b 1.03 .02b 1.38 .01b
Age squared 1.01 .02b N/A N/A 0.99 .01b
Sex
 Male 1.59 .04b 2.25 .05b 1.25 .57 0.58 .34
 Female Reference
Type of insurance
 Private 1.75 .24 1.38 .65 1.17 .76 0.09 <.001b
 Medicaid/Medicare Reference
Region
 Urban 1.23 .59 N/A N/A 1.33 .66 0.51 .33
 Rural Reference
Comorbidities
 Depression 1.35 .27 1.23 .65 1.46 .37 0.09 .03b
 Diabetes 0.90 .84 0.25 .12 3.60 .01b 0.58 .64
 Obesity 0.71 .44 3.40 .02b 0.80 .67 1.69 .54
 Smoking 0.99 .99 0.96 .95 1.52 .37 0.46 .38
Preoperative injections
 Yes 1.18 .52 0.71 .46 2.05 .10 0.63 .42
 No Reference
Preoperative physical therapy
 Yes 1.20 .45 0.89 .79 0.98 .97 1.11 .86
 No Reference
Preoperative prescriptions
 Opioid 1.64 .05b 2.70 .03b 2.44 .04b 2.53 .10
 NSAID 0.69 .19 0.52 .21 1.31 .51 0.68 .54
 Steroid 1.57 .17 1.23 .74 1.75 .25 1.04 .96
 Skeletal muscle relaxant 0.99 .97 0.72 .60 1.41 .49 0.90 .89

aThe age-squared variable was not statistically significant in total hip arthroplasty and lumbosacral surgery. Thus, we excluded the age-squared variable in these 2 regressions. N/A, not applicable; NSAID, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug; OR, odds ratio.

bSignificant at α = .05.

Discussion

Hip arthroscopic surgical indications are multifactorial and rely on a comprehensive patient evaluation. This study demonstrated that (1) there were preoperative patient variables, including age and sex, that affected prognosis; (2) preoperative interventions, including PT and IA injections, did not influence revision or conversion rates; (3) patients with obesity, diabetes, and opioid use were associated with higher revision and conversion rates; and (4) a subset of patients potentially required additional surgical interventions based on underlying comorbidities.

A prior large, population-based study documented an increased risk of conversion to THA within 2 years of arthroscopic surgery among patients with osteoarthritis, obesity, or treatment in a low-volume hip arthroscopic surgery institution.35 Age and sex have also been implicated, with increased conversion to THA after hip arthroscopic surgery occurring in older patients and female patients.25,36 However, other data have suggested that female and male patients younger than 45 years have equivalent outcomes.14 Age and articular cartilage health appear to have a critical role; among 8.7% of patients who converted to THA within 24 months, 17.1% were between 50 and 59 years old, and 16.5% were older than 60 years.36 Over 99% of these patients had preoperative osteoarthritis, regardless of age.36 Conversely, improved outcomes after hip arthroscopic surgery in older populations, despite an elevated conversion rate,10 have highlighted this controversy.

In our cohort, age and sex significantly correlated with postoperative revision hip arthroscopic surgery and conversion to THA. The age of 60 years was the threshold above which the risk for revision hip arthroscopic surgery significantly increased, in contrast to published data that suggested a 40-year age threshold.19,34 We believe that this increased age threshold reflects an improved understanding of the importance of articular cartilage health in hip arthroscopic surgery decision making. On the other hand, conversion to THA displayed an age-based linear trend, with patients being more at risk for eventual conversion as they increased in age. This likely indicates the progressive nature of osteoarthritis that may ultimately influence the failure of the index arthroscopic procedure.9,18,19,35,36 These data suggest a correlation of articular cartilage health to the revision rate. Prior studies2,5,6,31 have suggested this preliminary relationship, but further research is necessary. Future prognostic studies should consider including magnetic resonance imaging or other specific measures of articular cartilage health.

Interestingly, male sex demonstrated higher rates of arthroscopic revision and conversion to THA (OR, 1.59 and 2.25, respectively). This contrasts with previous data33,36 documenting worse outcomes in female patients but no sex difference in patients younger than 45 years.45 It is possible that male and female patients differ in their desire to undergo surgery, perceived acceptable level of functional impairment, and risk aversion. Women undergoing orthopaedic procedures have documented worse preoperative functional status compared with men, suggesting an advanced disease at the time of the index procedure.16 Male patients after total knee arthroplasty reported decreased 36-Item Short Form Health Survey physical scores, while female patients had lower general health scores, thus suggesting that physical and mental health might be more interrelated for female patients.44 Male patients also had greater postoperative improvement in social function, physical role function, pain scores, energy, and mental health.12,27 Thus, it may be possible that male patients inherently seek and benefit from earlier surgical interventions and that female patients delay before pursuing surgery and may benefit less.

Diabetic patients undergoing hip arthroscopic surgery had a greater risk of subsequent lumbosacral surgery, and obese patients were more likely to have conversion to THA. Patients in these categories could benefit from counseling to optimize glucose control and weight loss before surgery, which may affect this revision rate. A 1.2% subset of patients underwent additional abdominal surgery, suggesting that multiple causes of hip pain exist and are not always identified before hip arthroscopic surgery. Finally, preoperative opioid use was significantly associated with revision arthroscopic surgery, conversion to THA, and lumbosacral surgery. Implementing alternative pain management strategies before and after hip arthroscopic surgery may reduce these postoperative revision rates.

Our data revealed no relationship between preoperative PT or IA injections and revision surgery or extended postoperative medical care. These data may suggest that some patients who undergo hip arthroscopic surgery may have an anatomic issue that is not correctable via preoperative PT. While it is likely that patients who responded to PT and did not undergo surgery were not included in our analysis, we believe that this should make the 32.0% of the patients who had preoperative PT a more selective population that theoretically may have a more optimal postoperative course. However, this was not found. Rather, the lack of significant differences in the aforementioned variables between patients who did or did not undergo preoperative PT should represent a worst-case scenario in which patients who had no preoperative PT were compared with those who did. The lack of difference suggests that patients with underlying mechanical pathomorphology may not respond to preoperative PT and that surgical indications should be based on other factors such as history, physical examination results, and radiographic findings, among others.

A study by Mansell et al24 in 2018 found no significant difference between patients with FAI allocated to surgery versus rehabilitation, suggesting a primary role for PT in FAI. However, their study had an unusually high rate of crossover, an underpowered “as-treated” analysis, and very small improvements in patient-reported outcomes after surgery inconsistent with previous literature,13 making the results difficult to interpret. Our data suggest that while PT plays a role in preoperative management, it does not ultimately significantly influence outcomes in terms of the need for revision surgery or other intervention. Given this, it does not seem that PT has a primary role in managing this particular abnormality, and it is worth considering if PT should be focused during postoperative care. This could potentially reduce costs overall, avoid limiting PT visits prematurely secondary to insurance restrictions, and solve the issue of PT failure influencing surgical indications. We suggest that PT may be best allocated to postoperative recovery and advocate for re-evaluation of insurance coverage criteria that mandate preoperative PT.

Interestingly, preoperative IA injections did not significantly correlate with increased revision surgery or extended postoperative interventions. While it is possible that patients who received a negative response to IA injections did not undergo surgery and thus were not included, this would increase the difference between the IA and non-IA injection cohorts, but no significant correlation existed. Our data support previous data that documented a limited prognostic benefit to the ubiquitous use of IA injections.22 Nevertheless, the selective use of preoperative diagnostic IA injections may remain important for patients with increased complexity and multiple pain generators, in which a negative response to injections helps steer them from surgical interventions.

The type of insurance was not significantly related to the need for revision hip arthroscopic surgery, THA, or lumbosacral surgery. Those with private insurance had an OR of 1.75 to undergo revision hip arthroscopic surgery (P = .24), an OR of 1.38 to undergo THA (P = .65), and an OR of 1.17 to undergo lumbosacral surgery (P = .76). The trend appeared to be that those with private insurance were more likely to eventually need an additional procedure, although this was not significant. There were significantly decreased odds of undergoing abdominal surgery with private insurance (OR, 0.09; P < .001). The reason for this relationship was not abundantly clear, although it is reasonable to surmise that those with public insurance have a wider range of health disparities and medical concerns and ultimately experience different postoperative hospital courses, including an increased length of stay.11 The relationship between public insurance and overall outcome is a complex topic and one that we did not seek to address in this study. Further investigation is clearly warranted regarding whether type of insurance serves as an overall indicator of patient health status as well as the role that type of insurance plays in determining clinical outcomes.

Limitations

Our data are affected by the inherent limitations that exist with a large database analysis.28 The APCD relies on the accuracy of CPT and ICD-9 coding by surgeons and billers in Utah, and coding errors may affect the accuracy of these data. Patients captured included those who were continuously insured and had claims information at 6 months before and 12 months after surgery. Following data beyond the 1-year mark postoperatively could provide even more insight into revision surgery and treatment utilization. However, our ability to capture data at 6 months preoperatively and 12 months postoperatively should include the majority of early failures and complications.

Furthermore, we restricted our data search to patients aged ≥14 years, and thus, these data may not be applicable to very young populations. However, hip arthroscopic surgery is rarely indicated in skeletally immature populations, and thus, we believe that our data remain generalizable. Uninsured patients and patients with fee-for-service Medicare may represent a unique subset with different outcomes that we were unable to capture within the scope of our research. However, our ability to include commercial insurance payers, Medicaid, and Medicare Advantage should provide reasonable generalizability of these results to the majority of patients. It is possible that patients may have moved to Utah State immediately before or shortly after their index surgery, which may affect data accuracy. However, the APCD is not restricted by state but rather by insurance carrier. Given this, procedures that were performed in a different state but collected by the same insurance provider would be included, thereby limiting the frequency of these events.

In addition, we were unable to evaluate individual cases, including the specific details of imaging and arthroscopic surgery. Thus, subtleties such as dysplasia and early osteoarthritis seen at the time of arthroscopic surgery could not be collected. Subtleties among variables such as degree of obesity and severity of diabetes could also not be determined because of the binary nature of ICD-9 coding. Additionally, our 1-year follow-up inevitably did not include failures and revisions that occur later than this time period. Our database does not evaluate the surgical volume of providers, as this was not available. Finally, we did not have data on whether the “index” procedure may have been a revision of a surgical procedure performed before the data set query. Despite the aforementioned limitations, the large sample size and 3-year data capture provide the unique ability to risk-stratify many patient variables. Finally, it is not possible to identify laterality of the surgical procedure (both index and revision) utilizing CPT and ICD-9/10 codes. This is a limitation in that we did not know with certainty that the revision procedure was performed on the ipsilateral limb. Our assumption, given the practices of our institution, is that a revision procedure on the ipsilateral side is more likely than an additional index procedure on the contralateral side.

Conclusion

A relationship analysis among patient demographic and postoperative variables allows the development of a preoperative surgical algorithm to optimize outcomes and guide patient expectations. Patient selection for hip arthroscopic surgery should consider other causes of hip pain, including intra-abdominal abnormalities and lumbosacral spine disease. Patients aged 40 to 60 years and especially those over 60 years may benefit from advanced preoperative imaging to evaluate articular cartilage health. Our findings encourage a comprehensive preoperative assessment including HbA1c and body mass index, and particular focus should be placed on opioid usage identification and nonopioid pain strategies. The identification of factors that may increase future revision will hopefully improve patient outcomes and reduce revisions and extended postoperative medical care.

APPENDIX

TABLE A1.

ICD-9 and CPT Codes and Descriptionsa

Code Description
ICD-9
 296.0-296.99 Episodic mood disorders
 309.0-309.9 Adjustment reaction disorders
 311.0 Depressive disorder, not elsewhere classified
 250.0-250.93 Diabetes mellitus
 278.0-278.8 Overweight, obesity, and other hyperalimentation
 305.1 Tobacco use disorder
 V15.82 Personal history of tobacco use
CPT
Surgical: hip
 27130 Arthroplasty, acetabular and proximal femoral prosthetic replacement (total hip arthroplasty), with or without autograft or allograft
 29861 Hip arthroscopic surgery with removal of loose or foreign body
 29862 Hip arthroscopic surgery with chondroplasty
 29914 Hip arthroscopic surgery with femoroplasty
 29915 Hip arthroscopic surgery with acetabuloplasty
 29916 Hip arthroscopic surgery with labral repair
 29999 Unlisted arthroscopic surgery
Surgical: general surgery
 27299 Other procedures on pelvis or hip joint
 49505 Repair of initial inguinal hernia, age ≥5 years; reducible
 49568 Implantation of mesh or other prosthesis for open incisional or ventral hernia repair or mesh for closure of debridement for necrotizing soft tissue infection
 49659 Unlisted laparoscopy procedure, hernioplasty, herniorrhaphy, herniotomy
 49999 Unlisted procedure, abdomen, peritoneum, and omentum
Surgical: gynecological/urological/colorectal
 45560 Repair procedures on colon and rectum
 52000 Endoscopy-cystoscopy, urethroscopy, cystourethroscopy procedures on bladder
 52005 Cystourethroscopy, with ureteral catheterization, with or without irrigation, instillation, or ureteropyelography, exclusive of radiological service
 52204 Cystourethroscopy, with biopsy(s)
 52276 Cystourethroscopy, with direct vision internal urethrotomy
 52281 Cystourethroscopy, with calibration and/or dilation of urethral stricture or stenosis, with or without meatotomy, with or without injection procedure for cystography, male or female
 52310 Cystourethroscopy, with removal of foreign body, calculus, or ureteral stent from urethra or bladder (separate procedure); simple
 52317 Litholapaxy: crushing or fragmentation of calculus by any means in bladder and removal of fragments; simple or small (<2.5 cm)
 52318 Litholapaxy: crushing or fragmentation of calculus by any means in bladder and removal of fragments; complicated or large (>2.5 cm)
 52335 Cystourethroscopy with ureteroscopy and/or pyeloscopy
 52336 Cystourethroscopy with ureteroscopy and/or pyeloscopy, with removal or manipulation of calculus (including ureteral stent)
 52337 Cystourethroscopy with ureteroscopy and/or pyeloscopy, with lithotripsy (including ureteral stent)
 53200 Biopsy of urethra
 53210 Total urethrectomy, female
 53215 Total urethrectomy, male
 53410 Urethroplasty, 1-stage, of male anterior urethra
 54500 Biopsy of testis, needle
 54505 Biopsy of testis, incisional
 54530 Orchiectomy, radical, for tumor; inguinal approach
 54600 Reduction (surgical) of testis torsion
 54800 Biopsy of epididymis, needle
 54900 Epididymovasostomy (unilateral)
 55400 Vasovasostomy
 55530 Excision of varicocele or ligation of spermatic veins for varicocele
 55700 Needle biopsy of prostate, single or multiple
 55859 Transperineal catheter placement into prostate for brachytherapy
 57240 Anterior colporrhaphy, repair of cystocele with or without repair of urethrocele
 57250 Posterior colporrhaphy, repair of rectocele with or without perineorrhaphy
 57260 Combined anteroposterior colporrhaphy
 57265 Combined anteroposterior colporrhaphy, with enterocele repair
 57267 Insertion of mesh or other prosthesis for repair of pelvic floor defect, each site (anterior, posterior compartment), vaginal approach
 57268 Repair of enterocele, vaginal approach
 57270 Repair of enterocele, abdominal approach
 57280 Colpopexy, abdominal approach
 57282 Colpopexy, vaginal; extraperitoneal approach (sacrospinous, iliococcygeus)
 57283 Colpopexy, vaginal; intraperitoneal approach (uterosacral, levator myorrhaphy)
 57284 Paravaginal defect repair (including repair of cystocele, if performed); open abdominal approach
 57285 Paravaginal defect repair (including repair of cystocele, if performed); vaginal approach
 57288 Sling operation for stress incontinence (eg, fascia or synthetic)
 57295 Revision (including removal) of prosthetic vaginal graft; vaginal approach
 57423 Laparoscopic paravaginal defect repair (including repair of cystocele, if performed)
 57425 Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy
 57426 Laparoscopic revision (including removal) of prosthetic vaginal graft
 58263 Vaginal hysterectomy, for uterus ≤250 g; with removal of tube(s), and/or ovary(s), with repair of enterocele
 58270 Vaginal hysterectomy, for uterus ≤250 g; with repair of enterocele
 58280 Vaginal hysterectomy, with total or partial vaginectomy; with repair of enterocele
 58292 Vaginal hysterectomy, for uterus >250 g; with removal of tube(s) and/or ovary(s), with repair of enterocele
 58294 Vaginal hysterectomy, for uterus >250 g; with repair of enterocele
 58541 Laparoscopy, surgical, supracervical hysterectomy, for uterus ≤250 g
 58542 Laparoscopy, surgical, supracervical hysterectomy, for uterus ≤250 g; with removal of tube(s) and/or ovary(s)
 58543 Laparoscopy, surgical, supracervical hysterectomy, for uterus >250 g
 58544 Laparoscopy, surgical, supracervical hysterectomy, for uterus >250 g; with removal of tube(s) and/or ovary(s)
 58548 Laparoscopy, surgical, with radical hysterectomy, with bilateral total pelvic lymphadenectomy and para-aortic lymph node sampling (biopsy), with removal of tube(s) and ovary(s), if performed
 58550 Laparoscopy, surgical, with vaginal hysterectomy, for uterus ≤250 g
 58552 Laparoscopy, surgical, with vaginal hysterectomy, for uterus ≤250 g; with removal of tube(s) and/or ovary(s)
 58553 Laparoscopy, surgical, with vaginal hysterectomy, for uterus >250 g
 58554 Laparoscopy, surgical, with vaginal hysterectomy, for uterus >250 g; with removal of tube(s) and/or ovary(s)
 58570 Laparoscopy, surgical, with total hysterectomy, for uterus ≤250 g
 58571 Laparoscopy, surgical, with total hysterectomy, for uterus ≤250 g; with removal of tube(s) and/or ovary(s)
 58572 Laparoscopy, surgical, with total hysterectomy, for uterus >250 g
 58573 Laparoscopy, surgical, with total hysterectomy, for uterus >250 g; with removal of tube(s) and/or ovary(s)
 76872 Ultrasound, transrectal
Surgical: lumbosacral
 0195T Arthrodesis, presacral interbody technique, disc space preparation, discectomy, without instrumentation, with image guidance (including bone graft, when performed); L5-S1 interspace
 0196T Arthrodesis, presacral interbody technique, disc space preparation, discectomy, without instrumentation, with image guidance (including bone graft, when performed); L4-L5 interspace
 0200T Percutaneous sacral augmentation (sacroplasty), unilateral injection(s) (including use of balloon or mechanical device, when used), ≥1 needles (including imaging guidance and bone biopsy, when performed)
 0201T Percutaneous sacral augmentation (sacroplasty), bilateral injections (including use of balloon or mechanical device, when used), ≥2 needles (including imaging guidance and bone biopsy, when performed)
 0202T Posterior vertebral joint arthroplasty (eg, facet joint replacement) (including facetectomy, laminectomy, foraminotomy, and vertebral column fixation, injection of bone cement, when performed), including fluoroscopy, single level, lumbar spine
 0219T Placement of posterior intrafacet implant(s), unilateral or bilateral, including imaging and placement of bone graft(s) or synthetic device(s), single level: cervical
 0220T Placement of posterior intrafacet implant(s), unilateral or bilateral, including imaging and placement of bone graft(s) or synthetic device(s), single level: thoracic
 0221T Placement of posterior intrafacet implant(s), unilateral or bilateral, including imaging and placement of bone graft(s) or synthetic device(s), single level: lumbar
 0222T Placement of posterior intrafacet implant(s), unilateral or bilateral, including imaging and placement of bone graft(s) or synthetic device(s): each additional vertebral segment
 0274T Percutaneous laminotomy/laminectomy (interlaminar approach) for decompression of neural elements (with or without ligamentous resection, discectomy, facetectomy, and foraminotomy), any method, under indirect image guidance (eg, fluoroscopic, CT) with or without use of endoscope, single or multiple levels, unilateral or bilateral; cervical or thoracic
 0275T Percutaneous laminotomy/laminectomy (interlaminar approach) for decompression of neural elements (with or without ligamentous resection, discectomy, facetectomy, and foraminotomy), any method, under indirect image guidance (eg, fluoroscopic, CT) with or without use of endoscope, single or multiple levels, unilateral or bilateral; lumbar
 0309T Arthrodesis, presacral interbody technique, including disc space preparation, discectomy, with posterior instrumentation, with image guidance (including bone graft, when performed), lumbar, L4-L5 interspace
 22100 Partial excision of posterior vertebral component (eg, spinous process, lamina or facet) for intrinsic bony lesion, single vertebral segment; cervical
 22101 Partial excision of posterior vertebral component (eg, spinous process, lamina or facet) for intrinsic bony lesion, single vertebral segment; thoracic
 22102 Partial excision of posterior vertebral component (eg, spinous process, lamina or facet) for intrinsic bony lesion, single vertebral segment; lumbar
 22103 Partial excision of posterior vertebral component (eg, spinous process, lamina or facet) for intrinsic bony lesion, single vertebral segment; each additional segment
 22110 Partial excision of vertebral body, for intrinsic bony lesion, without decompression of spinal cord or nerve root(s), single vertebral segment; cervical
 22112 Partial excision of vertebral body, for intrinsic bony lesion, without decompression of spinal cord or nerve root(s), single vertebral segment; thoracic
 22114 Partial excision of vertebral body, for intrinsic bony lesion, without decompression of spinal cord or nerve root(s), single vertebral segment; lumbar
 22116 Partial excision of vertebral body, for intrinsic bony lesion, without decompression of spinal cord or nerve root(s), single vertebral segment; each additional vertebral segment
 22206 Osteotomy of spine, posterior or posterolateral approach, 3 columns, 1 vertebral segment (eg, pedicle/vertebral body subtraction); thoracic
 22207 Osteotomy of spine, posterior or posterolateral approach, 3 columns, 1 vertebral segment (eg, pedicle/vertebral body subtraction); lumbar
 22208 Osteotomy of spine, posterior or posterolateral approach, 3 columns, 1 vertebral segment (eg, pedicle/vertebral body subtraction); each additional vertebral segment
 22210 Osteotomy of spine, posterior or posterolateral approach, 1 vertebral segment; cervical
 22212 Osteotomy of spine, posterior or posterolateral approach, 1 vertebral segment; thoracic
 22214 Osteotomy of spine, posterior or posterolateral approach, 1 vertebral segment; lumbar
 22216 Osteotomy of spine, posterior or posterolateral approach, 1 vertebral segment; each additional vertebral segment
 22220 Osteotomy of spine, including discectomy, anterior approach, single vertebral segment; cervical
 22222 Osteotomy of spine, including discectomy, anterior approach, single vertebral segment; thoracic
 22224 Osteotomy of spine, including discectomy, anterior approach, single vertebral segment; lumbar
 22226 Osteotomy of spine, including discectomy, anterior approach, single vertebral segment; each additional vertebral segment
 22532 Arthrodesis, lateral extracavitary technique, including minimal discectomy to prepare interspace (other than for decompression); thoracic
 22533 Arthrodesis, lateral extracavitary technique, including minimal discectomy to prepare interspace (other than for decompression); lumbar
 22534 Arthrodesis, lateral extracavitary technique, including minimal discectomy to prepare interspace (other than for decompression); thoracic or lumbar, each additional vertebral segment
 22548 Arthrodesis, anterior transoral or extraoral technique, clivus-C1-C2 (atlas-axis), with or without excision of odontoid process
 22551 Arthrodesis, anterior interbody, including disc space preparation, discectomy, osteophytectomy, and decompression of spinal cord and/or nerve roots; cervical below C2
 22552 Arthrodesis, anterior interbody, including disc space preparation, discectomy, osteophytectomy, and decompression of spinal cord
 22554 Arthrodesis, anterior interbody technique, including minimal discectomy to prepare interspace (other than for decompression); cervical below C2
 22556 Arthrodesis, anterior interbody technique, including minimal discectomy to prepare interspace (other than for decompression); thoracic
 22558 Arthrodesis, anterior interbody technique, including minimal discectomy to prepare interspace (other than for decompression); lumbar
 22585 Arthrodesis, anterior interbody technique, including minimal discectomy to prepare interspace (other than for decompression); each additional interspace
 22586 Arthrodesis, presacral interbody technique, including disc space preparation, discectomy, with posterior instrumentation, with image guidance (including bone graft, when performed), L5-S1 interspace
 22590 Arthrodesis, posterior technique, craniocervical (occiput-C2)
 22595 Arthrodesis, posterior technique, atlas-axis (C1-C2)
 22600 Arthrodesis, posterior or posterolateral technique, single level; cervical below C2
 22610 Arthrodesis, posterior or posterolateral technique, single level; thoracic (with or without lateral transverse technique)
 22612 Arthrodesis, posterior or posterolateral technique, single level; lumbar (with or without lateral transverse technique)
 22614 Arthrodesis, posterior or posterolateral technique, single level; each additional vertebral segment
 22630 Arthrodesis, posterior interbody technique, including laminectomy and/or discectomy to prepare interspace (other than for decompression), single interspace; lumbar
 22632 Arthrodesis, posterior interbody technique, including laminectomy and/or discectomy to prepare interspace (other than for decompression), single interspace; each additional interspace
 22633 Arthrodesis, combined posterior or posterolateral technique with posterior interbody technique, including laminectomy and/or discectomy sufficient to prepare interspace
 22634 Arthrodesis, combined posterior or posterolateral technique with posterior interbody technique, including laminectomy and/or discectomy sufficient to prepare interspace (other than for decompression), single interspace and segment; each additional interspace and segment
 22800 Arthrodesis, posterior, for spinal deformity, with or without cast; ≤6 vertebral segments
 22802 Arthrodesis, posterior, for spinal deformity, with or without cast; 7-12 vertebral segments
 22804 Arthrodesis, posterior, for spinal deformity, with or without cast; ≥13 vertebral segments
 22808 Arthrodesis, anterior, for spinal deformity, with or without cast; 2-3 vertebral segments
 22810 Arthrodesis, anterior, for spinal deformity, with or without cast; 4-7 vertebral segments
 22812 Arthrodesis, anterior, for spinal deformity, with or without cast; ≥8 vertebral segments
 22818 Kyphectomy, circumferential exposure of spine and resection of vertebral segment(s) (including body and posterior elements); 1-2 segments
 22819 Kyphectomy, circumferential exposure of spine and resection of vertebral segment(s) (including body and posterior elements); ≥3 segments
 22830 Exploration of spinal fusion
 22840 Posterior nonsegmental instrumentation (eg, Harrington rod technique, pedicle fixation across 1 interspace, atlantoaxial transarticular screw fixation, sublaminar wiring at C1, facet screw fixation)
 22850 Removal of posterior nonsegmental instrumentation (eg, Harrington rod)
 22852 Removal of posterior segmental instrumentation
 22855 Removal of anterior segmental instrumentation
 22859 Insertion of intervertebral biomechanical device to intervertebral disc space or vertebral body defect without interbody arthrodesis, each contiguous defect
 22867 Insertion of interlaminar/interspinous process stabilization/distraction device, without fusion (including image guidance, when performed), with open decompression, lumbar; single level
 22868 Insertion of interlaminar/interspinous process stabilization/distraction device, without fusion (including image guidance, when performed), with open decompression, lumbar; second level
 22869 Insertion of interlaminar/interspinous process stabilization/distraction device, without open decompression or fusion (including image guidance, when performed), lumbar; single level
 22870 Insertion of interlaminar/interspinous process stabilization/distraction device, without open decompression or fusion (including image guidance, when performed), lumbar; second level
 22899 Unlisted procedure, spine
 63001 Laminectomy, with exploration and/or decompression of spinal cord and/or cauda equina, without facetectomy, foraminotomy, or discectomy (eg, spinal stenosis), 1 or 2 vertebral segments; cervical
 63003 Laminectomy, with exploration and/or decompression of spinal cord and/or cauda equina, without facetectomy, foraminotomy, or discectomy (eg, spinal stenosis), 1 or 2 vertebral segments; thoracic
 63005 Laminectomy, with exploration and/or decompression of spinal cord and/or cauda equina, without facetectomy, foraminotomy, or discectomy (eg, spinal stenosis), 1 or 2 vertebral segments; lumbar, except for spondylolisthesis
 63011 Laminectomy, with exploration and/or decompression of spinal cord and/or cauda equina, without facetectomy, foraminotomy, or discectomy (eg, spinal stenosis), 1 or 2 vertebral segments; sacral
 63012 Laminectomy, with removal of abnormal facets and/or pars interarticularis, with decompression of cauda equina and nerve roots for spondylolisthesis, lumbar (Gill-type procedure)
 63015 Laminectomy, with exploration and/or decompression of spinal cord and/or cauda equina, without facetectomy, foraminotomy, or discectomy (eg, spinal stenosis), >2 vertebral segments; cervical
 63016 Laminectomy, with exploration and/or decompression of spinal cord and/or cauda equina, without facetectomy, foraminotomy, or discectomy (eg, spinal stenosis), >2 vertebral segments; thoracic
 63017 Laminectomy, with exploration and/or decompression of spinal cord and/or cauda equina, without facetectomy, foraminotomy, or discectomy (eg, spinal stenosis), >2 vertebral segments; lumbar
 63020 Laminotomy (hemilaminectomy), with decompression of nerve root(s), including partial facetectomy, foraminotomy, and/or excision of herniated intervertebral disc, including open and endoscopically assisted approaches; 1 interspace, cervical
 63030 Laminotomy (hemilaminectomy), with decompression of nerve root(s), including partial facetectomy, foraminotomy, and/or excision of herniated intervertebral disc, including open and endoscopically assisted approaches; 1 interspace, lumbar
 63035 Laminotomy (hemilaminectomy), with decompression of nerve root(s), including partial facetectomy, foraminotomy, and/or excision of herniated intervertebral disc, including open and endoscopically assisted approaches; each additional interspace, cervical or lumbar
 63040 Laminotomy (hemilaminectomy), with decompression of nerve root(s), including partial facetectomy, foraminotomy, and/or excision of herniated intervertebral disc, re-exploration, single interspace; cervical
 63042 Laminotomy (hemilaminectomy), with decompression of nerve root(s), including partial facetectomy, foraminotomy, and/or excision of herniated intervertebral disc, re-exploration, single interspace; lumbar
 63050 Laminoplasty, cervical, with decompression of spinal cord, ≥2 vertebral segments
 63055 Transpedicular approach, with decompression of spinal cord, cauda equina, and/or nerve root(s) (eg, herniated intervertebral disc), single segment; thoracic
 63056 Transpedicular approach, with decompression of spinal cord, cauda equina, and/or nerve root(s) (eg, herniated intervertebral disc), single segment; lumbar (including transfacet or lateral extraforaminal approach) (eg, far lateral herniated intervertebral disc)
 63057 Transpedicular approach, with decompression of spinal cord, cauda equina, and/or nerve root(s) (eg, herniated intervertebral disc), single segment; each additional segment, thoracic or lumbar
 63064 Costovertebral approach, with decompression of spinal cord or nerve root(s) (eg, herniated intervertebral disc), thoracic; single segment
 63066 Costovertebral approach, with decompression of spinal cord or nerve root(s) (eg, herniated intervertebral disc), thoracic; each additional segment
 63075 Discectomy, anterior, with decompression of spinal cord and/or nerve root(s), including osteophytectomy; cervical, single interspace
 63076 Discectomy, anterior, with decompression of spinal cord and/or nerve root(s), including osteophytectomy; cervical, each additional interspace
 63077 Discectomy, anterior, with decompression of spinal cord and/or nerve root(s), including osteophytectomy; thoracic, single interspace
 63078 Discectomy, anterior, with decompression of spinal cord and/or nerve root(s), including osteophytectomy; thoracic, each additional interspace
 63081 Vertebral corpectomy (vertebral body resection), partial or complete, anterior approach, with decompression of spinal cord and/or nerve root(s); cervical, single segment
 63082 Vertebral corpectomy (vertebral body resection), partial or complete, anterior approach, with decompression of spinal cord and/or nerve root(s); cervical, each additional segment
 63085 Vertebral corpectomy (vertebral body resection), partial or complete, transthoracic approach, with decompression of spinal cord and/or nerve root(s); thoracic, single segment
 63086 Vertebral corpectomy (vertebral body resection), partial or complete, transthoracic approach, with decompression of spinal cord and/or nerve root(s); thoracic, each additional segment
 63087 Vertebral corpectomy (vertebral body resection), partial or complete, combined thoracolumbar approach, with decompression of spinal cord, cauda equina, or nerve root(s), lower thoracic or lumbar; single segment
 63088 Vertebral corpectomy (vertebral body resection), partial or complete, combined thoracolumbar approach, with decompression of spinal cord, cauda equina, or nerve root(s), lower thoracic or lumbar; each additional segment
 63090 Vertebral corpectomy (vertebral body resection), partial or complete, transperitoneal or retroperitoneal approach, with decompression of spinal cord, cauda equina, or nerve root(s), lower thoracic, lumbar, or sacral; single segment
 63091 Vertebral corpectomy (vertebral body resection), partial or complete, transperitoneal or retroperitoneal approach, with decompression of spinal cord, cauda equina, or nerve root(s), lower thoracic, lumbar, or sacral; each additional segment
 63101 Vertebral corpectomy (vertebral body resection), partial or complete, lateral extracavitary approach, with decompression of spinal cord and/or nerve root(s) (eg, for tumor or retropulsed bone fragment); thoracic, single segment
 63102 Vertebral corpectomy (vertebral body resection), partial or complete, lateral extracavitary approach, with decompression of spinal cord and/or nerve root(s) (eg, for tumor or retropulsed bone fragment); lumbar, single segment
 63103 Vertebral corpectomy (vertebral body resection), partial or complete, lateral extracavitary approach, with decompression of spinal cord and/or nerve root(s) (eg, for tumor or retropulsed bone fragment); thoracic or lumbar, each additional segment
 63170 Laminectomy with myelotomy (eg, Bischof or DREZ type), cervical, thoracic, or thoracolumbar
 63172 Laminectomy with drainage of intramedullary cyst/syrinx; to subarachnoid space
 63173 Laminectomy with drainage of intramedullary cyst/syrinx; to peritoneal or pleural space
 63180 Laminectomy and section of dentate ligaments, with or without dural graft, cervical; 1-2 segments
 63182 Laminectomy and section of dentate ligaments, with or without dural graft, cervical; >2 segments
 63185 Laminectomy with rhizotomy; 1-2 segments
 63190 Laminectomy with rhizotomy; >2 segments
 63191 Laminectomy with section of spinal accessory nerve
 63194 Laminectomy with cordotomy, with section of 1 spinothalamic tract, 1 stage; cervical
 63200 Laminectomy with release of tethered spinal cord, lumbar
 63250 Laminectomy for excision or occlusion of arteriovenous malformation of spinal cord; cervical
 63251 Laminectomy for excision or occlusion of arteriovenous malformation of spinal cord; thoracic
 63252 Laminectomy for excision or occlusion of arteriovenous malformation of spinal cord; thoracolumbar
 63265 Laminectomy for excision or evacuation of intraspinal lesion other than neoplasm, extradural; cervical
 63267 Laminectomy for excision or evacuation of intraspinal lesion other than neoplasm, extradural; lumbar
 63268 Laminectomy for excision or evacuation of intraspinal lesion other than neoplasm, extradural; sacral
 63270 Laminectomy for excision of intraspinal lesion other than neoplasm, intradural; cervical
 63271 Laminectomy for excision of intraspinal lesion other than neoplasm, intradural; thoracic
 63272 Laminectomy for excision of intraspinal lesion other than neoplasm, intradural; lumbar
 63286 Laminectomy for biopsy/excision of intraspinal neoplasm; intradural, intramedullary, thoracic
 63300 Vertebral corpectomy (vertebral body resection), partial or complete, for excision of intraspinal lesion, single segment; extradural, cervical
 63308 Vertebral corpectomy (vertebral body resection), partial or complete, for excision of intraspinal lesion, each additional segment
Physical therapy
 92507 Treatment of speech, language, voice, communication, and/or auditory processing disorder; individual
 97001 Physical therapy evaluation
 97010 Hot or cold pack application
 97012 Mechanical traction
 97014 Electrical stimulation (unattended)
 97016 Vasopneumatic devices
 97022 Whirlpool
 97026 Infrared
 97032 Electrical stimulation (manual) (15 minutes)
 97033 Iontophoresis (15 minutes)
 97035 Ultrasound (15 minutes)
 97039 Unlisted modality (specify type and time if constant attendance)
 97110 Therapeutic exercises to develop strength and endurance, range of motion, and flexibility (15 minutes)
 97112 Neuromuscular re-education of movement, balance, coordination, kinesthetic sense, posture, and/or proprioception for sitting and/or standing activities (15 minutes)
 97113 Aquatic therapy with therapeutic exercises (15 minutes)
 97116 Gait training (including stair climbing) (15 minutes)
 97124 Massage, including effleurage, petrissage, and/or tapotement (stroking, compression, percussion) (15 minutes)
 97140 Manual therapy techniques (eg, connective tissue massage, joint mobilization and manipulation, and manual traction) (15 minutes)
 97150 Group therapeutic procedure(s) (≥2 participants)
 97250 Myofascial release (no longer a CPT code but billable under California workers’ compensation system in lieu of 97140)
 97530 Dynamic activities to improve functional performance, direct (one-on-one) with patient (15 minutes)
 97535 Self-care/home management training (eg, activities of daily living and compensatory training, meal preparation, safety procedures, and instructions in use of assistive technology devices/adaptive equipment), direct one-on-one contact (15 minutes)
 98960 Education and training for patient self-management by a qualified, nonphysician health care professional using a standardized curriculum, face-to-face with individual patient (could include caregiver/family) (30 minutes)
Injection
 20610 Arthrocentesis, aspiration, and/or injection; major joint or bursa (hip)
 20611 Arthrocentesis, aspiration, and/or injection; major joint or bursa (hip): ultrasound guided
 77002/77002-26 Fluoroscopic guidance of needle

aCPT, Current Procedural Terminology; CT, computed tomography; ICD-9, International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision.

Footnotes

One or more of the authors has declared the following potential conflict of interest or source of funding: T.G.M. is a paid speaker/presenter for Arthrex and has received hospitality payments from Arthrex and Aesculap Biologics. AOSSM checks author disclosures against the Open Payments Database (OPD). AOSSM has not conducted an independent investigation on the OPD and disclaims any liability or responsibility relating thereto.

Ethical approval for this study was waived by the University of Utah Institutional Review Board.

References

  • 1. Anthony CA, Pugely AJ, Gao Y, et al. Complications and risk factors for morbidity in elective hip arthroscopy: a review of 1325 cases. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2017;46(1):e1–e9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Anwander H, Rakhra KS, Melkus G, Beaule PE. T1rho hip cartilage mapping in assessing patients with cam morphology: how can we optimize the regions of interest? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017;475(4):1066–1075. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Ayeni OR, Farrokhyar F, Crouch S, Chan K, Sprague S, Bhandari M. Pre-operative intra-articular hip injection as a predictor of short-term outcome following arthroscopic management of femoroacetabular impingement. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014;22(4):801–805. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Barlow BT. CORR Insights(R): what factors predict conversion to THA after arthroscopy? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017;475(10):2546–2549. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Beaule PE, Kim YJ, Rakhra KS, Stelzeneder D, Brown TD. New frontiers in cartilage imaging of the hip. Instr Course Lect. 2012;61:253–262. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Beaule PE, Speirs AD, Anwander H, et al. Surgical correction of cam deformity in association with femoroacetabular impingement and its impact on the degenerative process within the hip joint. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017;99(16):1373–1381. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Bedard NA, Pugely AJ, Duchman KR, Westermann RW, Gao Y, Callaghan JJ. When hip scopes fail, they do so quickly. J Arthroplasty. 2016;31(6):1183–1187. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Bozic KJ, Chan V, Valone FH, 3rd, Feeley BT, Vail TP. Trends in hip arthroscopy utilization in the United States. J Arthroplasty. 2013;28(suppl 8):140–143. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Degen RM, Pan TJ, Chang B, et al. Risk of failure of primary hip arthroscopy: a population-based study. J Hip Preserv Surg. 2017;4(3):214–223. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Domb BG, Linder D, Finley Z, et al. Outcomes of hip arthroscopy in patients aged 50 years or older compared with a matched-pair control of patients aged 30 years or younger. Arthroscopy. 2015;31(2):231–238. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Englum BR, Hui X, Zogg CK, et al. Association between insurance status and hospital length of stay following trauma. Am Surg. 2016;82(3):281–288. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Ethgen O, Bruyere O, Richy F, Dardennes C, Reginster JY. Health-related quality of life in total hip and total knee arthroplasty: a qualitative and systematic review of the literature. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86(5):963–974. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Faucett SC, Nepple JJ, Andrade T, et al. Randomized controlled trial of hip arthroscopy surgery vs physical therapy: letter to the editor. Am J Sports Med. 2018;46(8):NP35–NP38. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Frank RM, Lee S, Bush-Joseph CA, Salata MJ, Mather RC, 3rd, Nho SJ. Outcomes for hip arthroscopy according to sex and age: a comparative matched-group analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016;98(10):797–804. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Griffin DR, Dickenson EJ, Wall PDH, et al. Hip arthroscopy versus best conservative care for the treatment of femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (UK FASHIoN): a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2018;391(10136):2225–2235. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Katz JN, Wright EA, Guadagnoli E, Liang MH, Karlson EW, Cleary PD. Differences between men and women undergoing major orthopedic surgery for degenerative arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 1994;37(5):687–694. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Kelly BT, Williams RJ, 3rd, Philippon MJ. Hip arthroscopy: current indications, treatment options, and management issues. Am J Sports Med. 2003;31(6):1020–1037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Kemp JL, MacDonald D, Collins NJ, Hatton AL, Crossley KM. Hip arthroscopy in the setting of hip osteoarthritis: systematic review of outcomes and progression to hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015;473(3):1055–1073. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Kester BS, Capogna B, Mahure SA, Ryan MK, Mollon B, Youm T. Independent risk factors for revision surgery or conversion to total hip arthroplasty after hip arthroscopy: a review of a large statewide database from 2011 to 2012. Arthroscopy. 2018;34(2):464–470. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Khanduja V, Villar RN. Arthroscopic surgery of the hip: current concepts and recent advances. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006;88(12):1557–1566. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Kivlan BR, Nho SJ, Christoforetti JJ, et al. Multicenter Outcomes After Hip Arthroscopy: Epidemiology (MASH Study Group). What are we seeing in the office, and who are we choosing to treat? Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2017;46(1):35–41. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Krych AJ, Sousa PL, King AH, Engasser WM, Levy BA. Intra-articular diagnostic injection exhibits poor predictive value for outcome after hip arthroscopy. Arthroscopy. 2016;32(8):1592–1600. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Larson CM, Giveans MR, Samuelson KM, Stone RM, Bedi A. Arthroscopic hip revision surgery for residual femoroacetabular impingement (FAI): surgical outcomes compared with a matched cohort after primary arthroscopic FAI correction. Am J Sports Med. 2014;42(8):1785–1790. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Mansell NS, Rhon DI, Meyer J, Slevin JM, Marchant BG. Arthroscopic surgery or physical therapy for patients with femoroacetabular impingement syndrome: a randomized controlled trial with 2-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2018;46(6):1306–1314. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Maradit Kremers H, Schilz SR, Van Houten HK, et al. Trends in utilization and outcomes of hip arthroscopy in the United States between 2005 and 2013. J Arthroplasty. 2017;32(3):750–755. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. McCarthy J, McMillan S. Arthroscopy of the hip: factors affecting outcome. Orthop Clin North Am. 2013;44(4):489–498. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. McGuigan FX, Hozack WJ, Moriarty L, Eng K, Rothman RH. Predicting quality-of-life outcomes following total joint arthroplasty: limitations of the SF-36 health status questionnaire. J Arthroplasty. 1995;10(6):742–747. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Memtsoudis SG. Limitations associated with the analysis of data from administrative databases. Anesthesiology. 2009;111(2):449. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Montgomery SR, Ngo SS, Hobson T, et al. Trends and demographics in hip arthroscopy in the United States. Arthroscopy. 2013;29(4):661–665. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Nabavi A, Olwill CM, Harris IA. Preoperative predictors of outcome in the arthroscopic treatment of femoroacetabular impingement. Hip Int. 2015;25(5):402–405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Rakhra KS, Cardenas-Blanco A, Melkus G, Schweitzer ME, Cameron IG, Beaule PE. Is the T1rho MRI profile of hyaline cartilage in the normal hip uniform? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015;473(4):1325–1332. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Redmond JM, Gupta A, Dunne K, Humayun A, Yuen LC, Domb BG. What factors predict conversion to THA after arthroscopy? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017;475(10):2538–2545. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Saadat E, Martin SD, Thornhill TS, Brownlee SA, Losina E, Katz JN. Factors associated with the failure of surgical treatment for femoroacetabular impingement: review of the literature. Am J Sports Med. 2014;42(6):1487–1495. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Sardana V, Philippon MJ, de Sa D, et al. Revision hip arthroscopy indications and outcomes: a systematic review. Arthroscopy. 2015;31(10):2047–2055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Schairer WW, Nwachukwu BU, McCormick F, Lyman S, Mayman D. Use of hip arthroscopy and risk of conversion to total hip arthroplasty: a population-based analysis. Arthroscopy. 2016;32(4):587–593. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Sing DC, Feeley BT, Tay B, Vail TP, Zhang AL. Age-related trends in hip arthroscopy: a large cross-sectional analysis. Arthroscopy. 2015;31(12):2307–2313. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Truntzer JN, Hoppe DJ, Shapiro LM, Abrams GD, Safran M. Complication rates for hip arthroscopy are underestimated: a population-based study. Arthroscopy. 2017;33(6):1194–1201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. United States Census Bureau. American fact finder. https://factfinder.census.gov/. Accessed March 4, 2019.
  • 39. United States Census Bureau. Utah: 2010 population and housing unit counts. https://www.census.gov/prod/cen2010/cph-2-46.pdf. Accessed March 4, 2019.
  • 40. Utah Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, Center for Health Data and Informatics, Utah Department of Health. Indicator-Based Information System for Public Health. http://ibis.health.utah.gov/. Accessed December 18, 2018.
  • 41. Utah Department of Health. About the all payer claims data. http://stats.health.utah.gov/about-the-data/apcd/. Accessed August 29, 2017.
  • 42. Utah Insurance Department. 2015 health insurance market report. https://insurance.utah.gov/wp-content/uploads/2015HealthMarketReport.pdf. Accessed March 4, 2019.
  • 43. Utah Department of Health. Utah health status update: healthcare cost in Utah. Brief summary of the 2014 Utah all payer claims data. https://ibis.health.utah.gov/pdf/opha/publication/hsu/SE01_APCD.pdf. Accessed July 30, 2018.
  • 44. van Essen GJ, Chipchase LS, O’Connor D, Krishnan J. Primary total knee replacement: short-term outcomes in an Australian population. J Qual Clin Pract. 1998;18(2):135–142. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Wright AA, Hegedus EJ, Taylor JB, Dischiavi SL, Stubbs AJ. Non-operative management of femoroacetabular impingement: a prospective, randomized controlled clinical trial pilot study. J Sci Med Sport. 2016;19(9):716–721. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine are provided here courtesy of SAGE Publications

RESOURCES