Skip to main content
HHS Author Manuscripts logoLink to HHS Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Safety Res. 2019 Mar 1;69:217–225. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2019.01.005

Youth and high school sports coaches’ experience with and attitudes about concussion and access to athletic trainers by sport type and age of athlete coached

Kelly Sarmiento 1,*, Jill Daugherty 1, Lara DePadilla 1
PMCID: PMC6597176  NIHMSID: NIHMS1017584  PMID: 31235231

Abstract

Introduction:

Concussions are a commonly reported injury in youth and high school sports and much of the responsibility related to concussion identification and response for young athletes is allocated to sports coaches. This paper presents findings on concussion-related education, access to resources, experiences, and attitudes among a large number of youth and high school sports coaches across a variety of sports nationwide.

Methodology:

Data were collected among coaches who completed the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) HEADS UP online concussion training pre-test between November 2016 and November 2017. Coaches’ concussion-related education, access to resources, experiences, and attitudes were compared by age of athlete coached and level of contact of sport. Medium and large effect sizes were considered of practical significance for interpretation.

Results:

During the study period, 187,801 youth sports or high school sports coaches completed the CDC HEADS UP online training and corresponding pre-test. Access to previous concussion training significantly varied among respondents by age of athlete coached. For example, 27.4% of coaches of athletes aged 5 and younger had taken previous training compared to 72.9% of coaches of athletes aged 14–18. About one-quarter (27.4%) of all coaches reported ever having had to pull an athlete out of a game because of a possible concussion and 19.5% reported access to an athletic trainer at all games and practices. These variables differed significantly among coaches by age of athletes coached; coaches of older athletes were more likely to report access to an athletic trainer and having had to pull an athlete out of a game compared to coaches of younger athletes. No statistical differences by level of contact were considered to be of practical significance based on effect size.

Conclusion:

Most coaches in this study report having access to education and hold attitudes consistent with best practices about concussion safety; however, overall access to concussion-related resources is limited. While differences in access to concussion-related education, experience, resources, and attitudes among coaches of varying levels of contact were small, medium to large variations were identified by age of athlete coached.

Practical applications:

Coaches bear an important part of the responsibility to prevent, identify, and manage concussions in young athletes. Tailored educational efforts may assist coaches of young athletes with recognition of concussion signs and symptoms and with feeling comfortable deciding whether an athlete needs to be evaluated for a possible concussion.

Keywords: Concussion, Coach, Education, Sports, Training

1. Introduction

Concussions are a commonly reported injury in youth and high school sports. Each year, as many as 330,000 children age 19 or younger seek care in U.S. emergency departments (ED) for a concussion or other traumatic brain injury (TBI) sustained during sports and recreational activities (Coronado, Haileyesus, Cheng, et al., 2015). From 2001 to 2012, the rate of ED visits for these injuries more than doubled among this age group (Coronado et al., 2015), possibly due to increased awareness. However, these numbers are likely a significant undercount as they do not include concussions and other TBIs that go untreated or those injuries treated in primary care, urgent care, specialty care, or those managed directly on the field or sideline (Arbogast, Curry, Pfeiffer, et al., 2016).

Caused by a bump, blow, or jolt to the head or body, a concussion is associated with chemical changes in the brain and may include stretching and damaging of nerve cells in the brain (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [CDC], 2017). While most athletes feel better within a couple of weeks, a concussion can lead to short- or long-term changes in how they think, act, learn, and feel (McCrea, Guskiewicz, Randolph, et al., 2013; Zemek, Barrowman, Freedman, et al., 2016). To help reduce the risk of adverse outcomes and prolonged recovery, concussion in sports guidelines recommend that athletes with a suspected concussion are removed from play the day of the injury and that the return to play process begin under the guidance of an appropriate healthcare provider (Giza, Kutcher, Ashwal, et al., 2013; McCrory, Meeuwisse, Dvorak, et al., 2017).

In youth and high school sports, much of the responsibility related to concussion identification and response falls on coaches. Thus, efforts to implement concussion education for coaches have increased dramatically over the past decade. This is exemplified by the coach concussion education requirement included in many of the concussion in sports laws that were passed between 2009 and 2014 in all 50 states and the District of Columbia (Harvey, 2013; Harvey, Koller, & Lowrey, 2015). In addition to state laws, many schools have policies that mandate coaches receive concussion information or complete a pre-season concussion education program (CDC, 2013).

The increasing need for broad access to concussion education for coaches of all sports led the CDC to create an online training on concussion prevention, recognition, and response. The training was initially launched in 2010 and is part of the CDC HEADS UP campaign—an educational campaign that is focused on concussion safety. In 2017, to help ensure the CDC HEADS UP training provides youth and high school sports coaches with the information and guidance they need, CDC updated the training to emphasize the importance of improving the culture of concussion safety and to include pre-test and post-test modules. The pre-test module includes questions on coaches’ demographic information, access to education and athletic trainers, and questions that gauge coaches’ concussion knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors prior to taking the training.

Education of coaches has been positively associated with recognition of concussion signs and symptoms (McLeod, Schwartz, & Bay, 2007) and with feeling comfortable deciding whether an athlete needs to be evaluated for a possible concussion (Chrisman, Schiff, Chung, et al., 2014). However, research examining access to concussion education and programs among coaches generally focuses on contact sports with little to no focus on non-contact sports (Enniss, Basiouny, Brewer, et al., 2018; Waltzman & Sarmiento, 2019). Although concussions are more common in sports in which contact or collisions occur more frequently (such as in football, ice hockey, and soccer) they can happen in any sport (Marar, McIlvain, Fields, & Comstock, 2012). Additionally, despite the varying concussion awareness and educational needs of younger versus older athletes (Bloodgood, Inokuchi, Shawver, et al., 2013) and the applicability of legislation in 42 states to high school, middle school, and children younger than middle school (Baugh & Kroshus, 2014), to our knowledge, no research to date has explored differences in coach education or experience with concussion by age group coached.

To fill this gap, responses to CDC HEADS UP pre-test module questions about coaches’ experience with concussion, prior concussion training, their access to concussion education and support, and their attitudes toward concussion management were analyzed. Specifically, differences in coaches’ responses by the age of the athletes they coach, and whether their sport is contact, limited contact, or non-contact, were examined. It was hypothesized that coaches of older athletes and coaches of contact or collision sports were more likely to have had previous education, have access to resources, and have concussion attitudes consistent with best practices about concussion safety, compared to coaches of younger athletes and of non-contact or limited contact sports. To our knowledge, this is the largest sample of youth and high school sports coaches surveyed on concussion to date.

2. Methodology

Offered at no cost from the CDC, coaches and others involved in youth and school athletics are typically directed to the HEADS UP online training through sports programs that require concussion education prior to the start of sports season. Responses to the training’s pre-test are recorded in the database using a unique code to protect the privacy of the participants. Data for this paper were obtained from the pre-test results collected in the database between November 2016 and November 2017. It was determined that this secondary analysis of data was exempt from human subjects and paperwork reduction act regulations as data were collected as part of the regular function of the training and were designed for training improvement and evaluation. For this analysis, the sample was limited to youth sports coaches and high school sports coaches (n=187,801). A future study on the effectiveness of the CDC HEADS UP online training on improving concussion knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors using a comparison of the pre- and post-test data from the online training is in process.

2.1. Measures

Demographics: Respondent’s role was assessed with the question “I am a (select each option that best describes you).” The response categories were “youth sports coach,” “high school sports coach,” “sports official,” “athletic trainer,” “parent,” and “other.” Respondents were able to choose more than one option. Sport respondent is involved with was measured with the question: “What sport(s) are you involved with? (select all that apply).” Please see Table 1 for response options. Each sport was then categorized by level of contact based on the potential for physical contact and intensity (Mirabelli, Devine, Singh, & Mendoza, 2015; Mitchell, Haskell, Snell, & Van Camp, 2005; Moses, 2018; Rice, 2008). The levels include “collision or contact sports” (such as football and soccer), “limited contact sports” (such as baseball and volleyball), and “non-contact sports” (such as track and field and tennis). Age of athletes respondent works with was measured with the question “What ages do you work with? (check all that apply).” Response categories were “5 and younger,” “6‒10,” “11‒13,” “14‒18,” and “not applicable.” Sex of athletes respondent works with was assessed with the question “Do you work with boys, girls, or both?”

Table 1.

Background characteristics of respondents of total sample.

Respondent’s role Frequency Percent
Youth sports coach 162,089 86.3
High school sports coach 13,598 7.2
Both 12,114 6.5
 
Sport respondent is involved witha,b
Contact or collision sports
 Football 41,634 22.2
 Ice hockey 8,977 4.8
 Field hockey 1,436 0.8
 Soccer 70,300 37.5
 Basketball 33,303 17.8
 Lacrosse 6,035 3.2
 Wrestling 5,047 2.7
 Diving 747 0.4
 Rugby 773 0.4
 Subtotal for contact or collision sports 168,252 89.7
Limited contact sports
 Baseball 53,438 28.5
 Softball 22,551 12.0
 Gymnastics 5,880 3.1
 Volleyball 9,278 5.0
 Subtotal for limited contact sports 91,147 48.6
Non-contact sports
 Tennis 2,952 1.6
 Track field 7,887 4.2
 Subtotal for non-contact sports 10,839 5.8
Unknown level of contact
 Other 23,231 12.4
 
Age of children respondent works witha,c
5 and younger 39,961 21.3
6‒10 114,693 61.1
11‒13 93,008 49.6
14‒18 59,248 31.6
 
Sex of children respondent works with
Boys 62,058 33.1
Girls 36,861 19.6
Both 88,593 47.2
N/A 281 0.2
Total 187,793 100.0
a

Respondents were permitted to select more than one response; there were 187,801 unique respondents.

b

59,300 coaches selected multiple sports.

c

83,809 coaches selected multiple age groups.

Education: Prior concussion education was measured with the question “Prior to taking the training today, have you completed a training about concussion prevention and preparedness?” Response options were “Yes” and “No.”

Resources: Respondents were asked “How often do you carry information about concussions with you when you are coaching?” and “How often do your athletes have access to an athletic trainer or other health care provider?” Response options for both questions were “At all games and practices,” “At some games and practices,” “Only at games,” “Only at practices,” and “Never.” The responses “only at games” and “only at practices” were collapsed into a single category.

Experience: Respondents were asked “Have you ever had to pull an athlete out of a game because of a possible concussion?” Response options were “No”, “Yes,” and “N/A.” Respondents were also asked “Has a healthcare provider ever diagnosed an athlete you were coaching with a concussion?” Response options were “No,” “Yes,” “Unsure,” and “N/A.”

Attitudes: Respondents were asked six attitude questions that were developed for the CDC HEADS UP training pre-test and post-test modules: “I am confident in my ability to recognize concussion symptoms in youth athletes,” “There are things I can do to help prevent concussion among my athletes,” “My athletes would tell me if they experienced concussion symptoms,” “I am confident in my ability to help an athlete with the return to play process,” “I talk with my athletes about concussion and encourage them to report concussion symptoms,” and “I plan to teach my athletes ways to prevent concussion.” Response options for each were “strongly agree,” “agree,” “neither agree nor disagree,” “disagree,” and “strongly disagree.” The five categories were collapsed into three: “strongly agree/agree,” “neither agree nor disagree,” and “disagree/strongly disagree.”

2.2. Analysis

Descriptive statistics for study variables were computed using the entire sample of youth and high school sports coaches. To examine potential differences in study variables by age group, the analytic sample was limited to youth and high school sports coaches who selected a single age group (n=102,673), with those who selected “N/A” excluded (N=1,143). Similarly, to examine potential differences by level of contact, the analytic sample was limited to youth and high school coaches who selected a single sport and excluded those who responded with “other” (n=15,117), which represented a sport that could not be categorized by contact level, to sport coached (n=112,593).

The statistical package SAS version 9.3 was used for the primary analyses (http://www.sas.com). Statistical significance was determined using χ2 tests at the p < .05 level. Due to the large sample size, effect sizes (Cramer’s V) were computed for each χ2 test and effect sizes were interpreted in accordance with their degrees of freedom as described in Ellis (2010) and Zaiontz (2013). When the effect size was medium or large, pairwise comparisons of percentages by age group and level of contact were conducted using the comparison of proportions test in SPSS version 24 with the Bonferroni correction selected in order to identify which specific pairs were different from one another (https://www.ibm.com/analytics/spss-statistics-software). Small effect sizes were considered an artifact of the large sample and were not interpreted in the text as they were not considered to be of practical significance (Ellis, 2010; Zaiontz, 2013).

3. Results

3.1. Background characteristics of respondents (Table 1)

During the study period, a total of 187,801 coaches completed the CDC HEADS UP online training and the corresponding pre-test (162,089 youth sports coaches, 13,598 high school sports coaches, and 12,114 who identified as both). Approximately 37.5% of all coaches were involved in soccer, 28.5% in baseball, 22.2% in football, and 17.8% in basketball. Respondents were permitted to select more than one type of sport and 59,300 coaches did so. Approximately 90% of respondents reported coaching at least one contact or collision sport, 48.6% reported coaching at least one limited contact sport, and 5.8% reported coaching at least one non-contact sport. Most respondents (61.1%) coached athletes 6‒10 years of age. This was followed by 49.6% coaching athletes 11‒13 years of age, 31.6% coaching athletes 14‒18 years of age, and 21.3% coaching athletes 5 years of age and younger. Respondents were permitted to report working with more than one age group and nearly half (n=83,809) did so. Almost half of respondents reported coaching both boys and girls (47.2%), 33.1% reported coaching boys only, and 19.6% reported coaching girls only.

3.2. Concussion-related education, access to resources, experiences, and attitudes (Table 2)

Table 2.

Concussion-related education, access to resources, experiences and attitudes.

Overall

Frequency Percent
Education
Prior to taking the training today, have you completed a training about concussion prevention and preparedness?
 Yes 111,392 59.3
 No 76,391 40.7
 Total 187,783 100.0
 
Resources
How often do you carry information about concussions with you when you are coaching?
 At all games and practices 95,282 50.7
 At some games and practices 15,483 8.2
 Only at games OR only at practices 5,391 2.9
 Never 71,632 38.2
 Total 187,788 100.0
How often do your athletes have access to an athletic trainer or other health care provider?
 At all games and practices 36,672 19.5
 At some games and practices 34,496 18.4
 Only at games OR only at practices 28,291 15.1
 Never 61,142 32.6
 N/A 27,189 14.5
 Total 187,790 100.0
 
Experience
Have you ever had to pull an athlete out of a game because of a possible concussion?
 Yes 5,555 29.6
 No 118,547 63.1
 N/A 13,691 7.3
 Total 187,793 100.0
Has a medical provider ever diagnosed an athlete you were coaching with a concussion?
 Yes 37,644 20.1
 No 126,990 67.6
 Unsure 9,231 4.9
 N/A 13,927 7.4
 Total 187,792 100.0
 
Attitudes
I am confident in my ability to recognize concussion symptoms in youth athletes
 Strongly Agree/Agree 160,292 85.4
 Neither Agree Nor Disagree 21,833 11.6
 Disagree/Strongly Disagree 5,639 3.0
 Total 187,764 100.0
There are things I can do to help prevent concussion among my athletes
 Strongly Agree/Agree 176,214 93.9
 Neither Agree Nor Disagree 10,065 5.4
 Disagree/Strongly Disagree 1,483 0.8
 Total 187,762 100.0
My athletes would tell me if they experienced concussion symptoms
 Strongly Agree/Agree 89,027 47.4
 Neither Agree Nor Disagree 66,428 35.4
 Disagree/Strongly Disagree 32,304 17.2
 Total 187,759 100.0
I am confident in my ability to help an athlete with the return to play process
 Strongly Agree/Agree 151,617 80.8
 Neither Agree Nor Disagree 26,562 14.2
 Disagree/Strongly Disagree 9,578 5.1
 Total 187,757 100.0
I talk with my athletes about concussion and encourage them to report concussion symptoms
 Strongly Agree/Agree 148,851 79.3
 Neither Agree Nor Disagree 31,255 16.7
 Disagree/Strongly Disagree 7,648 4.1
 Total 187,754 100.0
I plan to teach my athletes ways to prevent concussion
 Strongly Agree/Agree 177,212 94.4
 Neither Agree Nor Disagree 9,721 5.2
 Disagree/Strongly Disagree 819 0.4
 Total 187,752 100.0

Over half of the respondents (59.3%) indicated that they had taken concussion prevention and preparedness training prior to the CDC HEADS UP training. Overall, about half of coaches (50.7%) reported carrying concussion information with them at all practices and games. Approximately one-fifth of respondents (19.5%) indicated that their athletes have access to an athletic trainer at all games and practices. About one-quarter (29.6%) of all coaches reported ever having had to pull an athlete out of a game because of a possible concussion. The overall percentage of coaches who reported having an athlete diagnosed with concussion by a medical provider was 20.1%.

Respondents were asked a series of questions related to their attitudes about concussions and their intentions related to conducting concussion education with their athletes. In response to the question “I am confident in my ability to recognize concussion symptoms in youth athletes,” 85.4% of coaches replied “strongly agreed” or “agreed.” About 93.9% of coaches strongly agreed or agreed that “there are things I can do to help prevent concussion among my athletes.” Less than half (47.4%) of coaches agreed or strongly agreed that “my athletes would tell me if they experienced concussion symptoms.” Eight in ten coaches (80.8%) agreed or strongly agreed that “I am confident in my ability to help an athlete with the return to play process.” Similarly, about 79.3% agreed or strongly agreed that they “talk with their athletes about concussion and encourage them to report concussion symptoms.” Finally, 94.4% of all coaches agreed or strongly agreed with the statement “I plan to teach my athletes ways to prevent concussion.”

3.3. Concussion-related education, access to resources, experiences, and attitudes by age group coached (Table 3)

Table 3.

Concussion-related education, access to resources, experiences and attitudes by age group coached (n = 102,673)a.

Mutually exclusive age categories





5 years and younger 6–10 years of age 11–13 years of age 14–18 years of age χ2 p-value Cramer’s Vb DF





Frequency Percent Frequency Percent Frequency Percent Frequency Percent
Education
Prior to taking the training today, have you completed a training about concussion prevention and preparedness? 6950.1 < 0.0001 0.26 3
 Yesc 2,596 27.4 24,730 50.9 17,182 66.3 13,609 72.9
 Noc 6,878 72.6 23,885 49.1 8,725 33.7 5,064 27.1
 Total 9,474 100.0 48,615 100.0 25,907 100.0 18,673 100.0
 
Resources
How often do you carry information about concussions with you when you are coaching? 1081.5 < 0.0001 0.06 9
 At all games and practices 4,511 47.6 24,202 49.8 14,323 55.3 10,165 54.4
 At some games and practices 456 4.8 3,652 7.5 2,209 8.5 1,780 9.5
 Only at games OR only at practices 177 1.9 1,132 2.3 795 3.1 743 4.0
 Never 4,330 45.7 19,629 40.4 8,580 33.1 5,986 32.1
 Total 9,474 100.0 48,615 100.0 25,907 100.0 18,674 100.0
How often do your athletes have access to an athletic trainer or other health care provider? 9541.4 < 0.0001 0.18 12
 At all games and practices c 1,202 12.7 7,910 16.3 5,033 19.4 5,848 31.3
 At some games and practices c 651 6.9 6,653 13.7 4,957 19.1 4,282 22.9
 Only at games OR only at practices d,e,f,g,h 704 7.4 6,173 12.7 4,683 18.1 3,462 18.5
 Never c 3,572 37.7 19,780 40.7 8,576 33.1 3,592 19.2
 N/A 3,345 35.3 8,100 16.7 2,658 10.3 1,490 8.0
 Total 9,474 100.0 48,616 100.0 25,907 100.0 18,674 100.0
 
Experience
Have you ever had to pull an athlete out of a game because of a possible concussion? 12,801.7 < 0.0001 0.25 6
 Yesc 377 4.0 7,253 14.9 9,124 35.2 8,842 47.4
 No e,f,g,h,i 7,154 75.5 37,212 76.5 15,486 59.8 8,817 47.2
 N/A d,e,f,g,h 1,943 20.5 4,151 8.5 1298 5.0 1,016 5.4
 Total 9,474 100.0 48,616 100.0 25,908 100.0 18,675 100.0
Has a medical provider ever diagnosed an athlete you were coaching with a concussion? 16,860.3 < 0.0001 0.23 9
 Yes c 189 2.0 3,313 6.8 5,619 21.7 7,840 42.0
 No c 6,947 73.3 39,255 80.8 17,691 68.3 8,940 47.9
 Unsure d,e,f,g,h 202 2.1 1,716 3.5 1,323 5.1 901 4.8
 N/A d,e,f,g,h 2,136 22.6 4,332 8.9 1,275 4.9 993 5.3
 Total 9,474 100.0 48,616 100.0 25,908 100.0 18,674 100.0
 
Attitudes
I am confident in my ability to recognize concussion symptoms in youth athletes 792.4 < 0.0001 0.06 6
 Strongly Agree/Agree 7,511 79.3 40,844 84.0 22,760 87.9 16,759 89.8
 Neither Agree Nor Disagree 1,516 16.0 6,203 12.8 2,566 9.9 1,548 8.3
 Disagree/Strongly Disagree 447 4.7 1,563 3.2 580 2.2 364 2.0
 Total 9,474 100.0 48,610 100.0 25,906 100.0 18,671 100.0
There are things I can do to help prevent concussion among my athletes 169.9 < 0.0001 0.03 6
 Strongly Agree/Agree 8,915 94.1 45,918 94.5 24,243 93.6 17,188 92.1
 Neither Agree Nor Disagree 506 5.3 2,365 4.9 1,441 5.6 1,229 6.6
 Disagree/Strongly Disagree 53 0.6 327 0.7 222 0.9 254 1.4
 Total 9,474 100.0 48,610 100.0 25,906 100.0 18,671 100.0
My athletes would tell me if they experienced concussion symptoms 1761.4 < 0.0001 0.09 6
 Strongly Agree/Agree 3,299 34.8 21,009 43.2 13,408 51.8 10,500 56.2
 Neither Agree Nor Disagree 3,917 41.4 18,224 37.5 8,394 32.4 5,572 29.8
 Disagree/Strongly Disagree 2,257 23.8 9,377 19.3 4,104 15.8 2,598 13.9
 Total 9,473 100.0 48,610 100.0 25,906 100.0 18,670 100.0
I am confident in my ability to help an athlete with the return to play process 909.8 < 0.0001 0.07 6
 Strongly Agree/Agree 6,914 73.0 37,935 78.0 21,507 83.0 15,951 85.4
 Neither Agree Nor Disagree 1,909 20.2 7,820 16.1 3,232 12.5 1,956 10.5
 Disagree/Strongly Disagree 651 6.9 2,854 5.9 1,167 4.5 763 4.1
 Total 9,474 100.0 48,609 100.0 25,906 100.0 18,670 100.0
I talk with my athletes about concussion and encourage them to report concussion symptoms 2890.3 < 0.0001 0.12 6
 Strongly Agree/Agree c 6,225 65.7 36,812 75.7 22,016 85.0 16,464 88.2
 Neither Agree Nor Disagree c 2,729 28.8 9,545 19.6 3,134 12.1 1820 9.8
 Disagree/Strongly Disagree c 520 5.5 2,251 4.6 756 2.9 385 2.1
 Total 9,474 100.0 48,608 100.0 25,906 100.0 18,669 100.0
I plan to teach my athletes ways to prevent concussion 247.3 < 0.0001 0.04 6
 Strongly Agree/Agree 8,610 90.9 45,885 94.4 24,667 95.2 17,578 94.2
 Neither Agree Nor Disagree 793 8.4 2,513 5.2 1,147 4.4 995 5.3
 Disagree/Strongly Disagree 71 0.8 210 0.4 91 0.4 96 0.5
 Total 9,474 100.0 48,608 100.0 25,905 100.0 18,669 100.0
a

This number includes only coaches who selected a single age group and excludes the 1143 coaches who selected N/A for the age group.

b

Cramer’s V helps to determine the effect size of the overall x2 test. Please see Ellis (2010) and Zaiontz (2013) for interpretation. Given the large sample size, only medium and large effect sizes are considered for pairwise analysis and interpretation.

c

All differences are significant at the p < .5 level.

d

Difference between 5 and younger and 6–10 is significant at the p < .5 level.

e

Difference between 5 and younger and 11–13 is significant at the p < .5 level.

f

Difference between 5 and younger and 14–18 is significant at the p < .5 level.

g

Difference between 6 and 10 and 11–13 is significant at the p < .5 level.

h

Difference between 6 and 10 and 14–18 is significant at the p < .5 level.

i

Difference between 11 and 13 and 14–18 is significant at the p < .5 level.

Coaches’ access to education across all age groups was significantly different from one another, with pairwise differences in the expected direction. For example, 27.4% of coaches of athletes age 5 and younger, 50.9% of coaches of athletes ages 6‒10, 66.3% of coaches of athletes ages 11‒13, and 72.9% of coaches of athletes ages 14‒18 reported having taken previous training. The Cramer’s V effect size of 0.26 suggests a medium level of practically significance between the age groups.

Testing of access to resources had mixed results. Although carrying concussion information at all games and practices showed statistically significantly differences by age of athlete coached in bivariate analysis, the effect size was not of practical significance. However, a Cramer’s V of 0.18 suggests that the differences in access to athletic trainers at all games and practices between age groups had medium practical significance. Comparisons of pairs of age groups followed the hypothesized direction, with a greater percentage of those who coached older athletes reporting that they have access to an athletic trainer than those who coached younger athletes. Specifically, 12.7% of coaches of athletes age 5 and younger, 16.3% of coaches of athletes ages 6‒10, 19.4% of coaches of athletes ages 11‒13, and 31.3% of coaches of athletes ages 14‒18 having access to an athletic trainer at all games and practices.

Analysis of the difference in experience with concussion across age groups showed large effect sizes. Pairwise differences between age groups were in the expected direction in terms of reporting having had to pull an athlete out of a game because of suspected concussion and had a large effect size (Cramer’s V=0.25). Only 4% of coaches of athletes age 5 and younger reported the experience as compared to 14.9% of coaches of athletes ages 6‒10, 35.2% of coaches of athletes ages 11‒13, and 47.2% of coaches of athletes ages 14‒18 having to do so. Similarly, all pairwise age group differences regarding having an athlete diagnosed with concussion by a medical provider were statistically significant and in the expected direction. A significantly higher percentage of coaches of older athletes reported having a medical provider ever diagnose a player with a concussion, compared to coaches of younger athletes (42.0% of coaches of 14–18 year olds, 21.7% of coaches of 11–13 year olds, 6.8% of coaches of 6–10 year olds, and 2.0% of coaches of athletes 5 years and younger; Cramer’s V=0.23).

Differences by age group, while statistically significant, showed a small level of practical significance for all concussion-related attitudes questions except one. A Cramer’s V of 0.12 suggests that overall age group differences had a medium level of practical significance for coaches who agreed or strongly agreed that they “talk with their athletes about concussion and encourage them to report concussion symptoms.” Pairwise differences indicated that the older the age of athletes coached, the higher level of agreement: 65.7% of those who only coach athletes 5 years of age and younger, 75.7% of those who coach children 6‒10 years of age, 85.0% of those who coach children 11‒13 years of age, and 88.2% of those who coach children age 14‒18 years of age agreed with the statement.

3.4. Concussion-related education, access to resources, experiences, and attitudes by contact level of sport (Table 4)

Table 4.

Concussion-related education, access to resources, experiences and attitudes by contact level of sport (n=112,593)a.

Mutually exclusive sport type categories





Contact or collision Limited contact Noncontact χ2 p-value Cramer’s Vb DF







Frequency Percentage Frequency Percentage Frequency Percentage
Education
Prior to taking the training today, have you completed a training about concussion prevention and preparedness? 968.3 <0.0001 0.09 2
 Yes 44,759 59.3 17,447 49.6 1,287 64.5
 No 30,683 40.7 17,698 50.4 710 35.6
 Total 75,442 100.0 35,145 100.0 1,997 100.0
 
Resources
How often do you carry information about concussions with you when you are coaching? 465.6 <0.0001 0.05 6
 At all games and practices 39,974 53.0 16,871 48.0 985 49.3
 At some games and practices 6,220 8.2 2,480 7.1 189 9.5
 Only at games OR only at practices 2,276 3.0 947 2.7 94 4.7
 Never 26,972 35.8 14,850 42.3 729 36.5
 Total 75,442 100.0 35,148 100.0 1,997 100.0
How often do your athletes have access to an athletic trainer or other health care provider? 2777.7 <0.0001 0.11 8
 At all games and practices 16,115 21.4 4,617 13.1 625 31.3
 At some games and practices 12,991 17.2 5,932 16.9 413 20.7
 Only at games OR only at practices 11,646 15.4 3,362 9.6 294 14.7
 Never 23,608 31.3 14,729 41.9 407 20.4
 N/A 11,083 14.7 6,508 18.5 258 12.9
 Total 75,443 100.0 35,148 100.0 1,997 100.0
 
Experience
Have you ever had to pull an athlete out of a game because of a possible concussion? 4053.7 <0.0001 0.13 4
 Yes 24,979 33.1 5,615 16.0 276 13.8
 No 43,843 58.1 26,868 76.4 1,536 76.9
 N/A 6,622 8.8 2,665 7.6 185 9.3
 Total 75,444 100.0 35,148 100.0 1,997 100.0
Has a medical provider ever diagnosed an athlete you were coaching with a concussion? 2807.0 <0.0001 0.11 6
 Yes 16,878 22.4 3,520 10.0 357 17.9
 No 48,214 63.9 27,556 78.4 1,365 68.4
 Unsure 3,387 4.5 1346 3.8 83 4.2
 N/A 6,964 9.2 2,726 7.8 192 9.6
 Total 75,443 100.0 35,148 100.0 1,997 100.0
 
Attitudes
I am confident in my ability to recognize concussion symptoms in youth athletes 100.8 <0.0001 0.02 4
 Strongly Agree/Agree 65,129 86.3 29,566 84.1 1,672 83.7
 Neither Agree Nor Disagree 8,206 10.9 4,455 12.7 256 12.8
 Disagree/Strongly Disagree 2,100 2.8 1,121 3.2 69 3.5
 Total 75,435 100.0 35,142 100.0 1,997 100.0
There are things I can do to help prevent concussion among my athletes 25.2 <0.0001 0.01 4
 Strongly Agree/Agree 70,243 93.1 32,966 93.8 1,882 94.2
 Neither Agree Nor Disagree 4,472 5.9 1,913 5.4 98 4.9
 Disagree/Strongly Disagree 720 1.0 263 0.8 17 0.9
 Total 75,435 100.0 35,142 100.0 1,997 100.0
My athletes would tell me if they experienced concussion symptoms 61.0 <0.0001 0.02 4
 Strongly Agree/Agree 36,278 48.1 16,306 46.4 1,068 53.5
 Neither Agree Nor Disagree 26,065 34.6 12,728 36.2 621 31.1
 Disagree/Strongly Disagree 13,092 17.4 6,106 17.4 308 15.4
 Total 75,435 100.0 35,140 100.0 1,997 100.0
I am confident in my ability to help an athlete with the return to play process 29.4 <0.0001 0.01 4
 Strongly Agree/Agree 61,110 81.0 28,077 79.9 1,633 81.8
 Neither Agree Nor Disagree 10,406 13.8 5,265 15.0 266 13.3
 Disagree/Strongly Disagree 3918 5.2 1,798 5.1 98 4.9
 Total 75,434 100.0 35,140 100.0 1,997 100.0
I talk with my athletes about concussion and encourage them to report concussion symptoms 642.2 <0.0001 0.05 4
 Strongly Agree/Agree 61,250 81.2 26,208 74.6 1,534 76.8
 Neither Agree Nor Disagree 11,539 15.3 7,218 20.5 367 18.4
 Disagree/Strongly Disagree 2,644 3.5 1,714 4.9 96 4.8
 Total 75,433 100.0 35,140 100.0 1,997 100.0
I plan to teach my athletes ways to prevent concussion 88.5 <0.0001 0.02 4
 Strongly Agree/Agree 71,251 94.5 32,874 93.6 1,810 90.6
 Neither Agree Nor Disagree 3,821 5.1 2,117 6.0 172 8.6
 Disagree/Strongly Disagree 360 0.5 148 0.4 15 0.8
 Total 75,432 100.0 35,139 100.0 1,997 100.0
a

This number includes only coaches who selected a single sport and excludes the 15,117 coaches who selected “other” for the sport that they coached, which represents an unknown level of contact.

b

Cramer’s V helps to determine the effect size of the overall x2 test. Please see Ellis (2010) and Zaiontz (2013) for interpretation. Given the large sample size, only medium and large effect sizes are considered for pairwise analysis and interpretation.

While differences in access to education between coaches of different levels of contact were statistically significant, they showed small effect sizes and were interpreted as having negligible practical significance (Cramer’s V=0.09). In terms of resources, including carrying information about concussions and access to athletic trainers at all games and practices, the Cramer’s V effect size values again suggests little practical significance by contact level of sport coached (0.05 and 0.11, respectively). Similarly, experience with concussion did not vary in a meaningful way by the contact level of sport coached (Cramer’s V=0.13). Finally, most coaches reported attitudes consistent with best practices for concussion safety. However, while there were statistical variations in attitudes by level of contact of sport coached, none of these differences were of medium or high practical significance.

4. Discussion

Youth and high school sports coaches are often the first to identify and respond to a possible concussion among young athletes. Their unique position to promote concussion safety is exemplified by concussion education requirements for school-based coaches nationwide (CDC, 2013). This study shows that most youth and high school sports coaches have completed or have access to educational opportunities about concussion, but there were disparities in access across coaches of by age groups of athletes coached, with coaches in older groups having greater access than younger groups. Coaches’ access to education did not vary significantly by the level of contact of sport coached. While some contact sports have instituted rule changes and sports-specific interventions to reduce the risk for concussion and other serious brain injuries, the lack of differences in access in education among contact versus noncontact sports may be attributed to the broad implementation of state and sports program concussion in sports policies. While at least one state has introduced primary prevention components into their concussion in sports laws, education components in many state laws are not specific to individual sports, such as sports with the highest incidence of concussion (Harvey et al., 2015). Instead, these policies laws often require coaches of various sports or physical activities to regularly complete concussion training, such as the CDC HEADS UP online training.

Concussions are a commonly reported injury among youth and high school athletes (Coronado et al., 2015; Pfister, Pfister, Hagel, Ghali, & Ronksley, 2015; Rosenthal, Foraker, Collins, et al., 2014). One in four coaches reported having had to remove an athlete from a game because of a suspected concussion and about one in six indicated that a healthcare provider has diagnosed one of their athletes with a concussion. The percentage of coaches reporting both of these experiences was significantly higher among those coaching older athletes compared to younger athletes. Athletes experience with concussion is consistent with findings in a recent CDC study on self-reported sports- or recreation-related concussions among high school students (DePadilla, Miller, Jones, et al., 2018). In that study, an estimated 2.5 million high school students reported a sports- or recreation-related concussion in the year before the survey (DePadilla et al., 2018). Similar studies that examine self-reported concussions among middle and elementary school students are warranted. Identifying a possible concussion can be challenging as concussion symptoms may not be noticeable at first or reported by an athlete (Delaney, Al Kashmiri, Drummond, et al., 2008; Rivara, Schiff, Chrisman, et al., 2014). Research by Kroshus et al. indicates that sports programs with greater access to athletic trainers demonstrate higher rates of concussion identification (Kroshus, Babkes Stellino, Chrisman, et al., 2017). However, among school-based sports, a little over one-third (37%) of public high schools have access to a full-time athletic trainer (Broglio, Cantu, Gioia, et al., 2014). Similarly, only about one-third of respondents in this survey indicated that they have access to an athletic trainer or other healthcare provider at some or all games and practices. Expanded access may help provide needed support for coaches on the sideline to assist with athlete safety and response (Kroshus, Rivara, Whitlock, et al., 2017). This is especially critical among contact sports in which the risk for concussion and the likelihood of removing an athlete from play for a possible concussion is increased (Marar et al., 2012).

Most coaches in this study reported that they are confident in their ability to recognize and respond to a concussion and plan to take steps to improve concussion safety for their athletes. This is important as young athletes depend on their coaches for guidance and need to feel comfortable in order to report their concussion symptoms (Chrisman, Quitiquit, & Rivara, 2013; Harmon, Drezner, Gammons, et al., 2013). Previous studies also suggest that increased focus on communication with athletes in educational materials for coaches may help improve reporting behaviors (Kroshus, Babkes Stellino, et al., 2017). Still, despite the majority of coaches reporting communicating with their athletes about concussion, less than half of coaches in this study agreed or strongly agreed that their athletes would report their concussion symptoms to them. Disparities in perceived likelihood of reporting concussion symptoms by athletes varied by the age of the athletes coached, with coaches of older athletes more likely to state that their athletes would report concussion symptoms. Similarly, coaches of the oldest athletes were more likely to strongly agree that they “talk with their athletes about concussion and encourage them to report concussion symptoms” as compared to coaches of the youngest athletes. The limited number of educational efforts tailored to athletes age 10 and under may be a contributing factor to these differences. An exploratory study by Kroshus, Gillard, Haarbauer-Krupa, Goldman, and Bickham (2016) identified knowledge gaps among young athletes and recommended the development of age-appropriate concussion education programming (Kroshus et al., 2016). Larger studies that assess the educational needs of the youngest athletes and their coaches, and an examination of age-appropriate concussion messages and educational materials is warranted. This study is subject to limitations. First, the pre-test data were collected for program evaluation purposes and are therefore based on a convenience sample of coaches who are involved in youth and high school athletics and chose to take the training; thus the findings are not generalizable to a wider population. Second, given the public and media attention on sports concussion, coaches may have felt the need to answer questions in a way they thought would be acceptable to the training administrators. Social desirability may have biased the level of self-reported agreement with attitudes about concussion captured in the pre-test. Third, the questions in this study capture behavioral intention versus actual behaviors. Follow-up studies that examine the effect of concussion education on concussion incidence and coaches’ behaviors on the field is warranted. Third, the data did not capture whether the participants coached at a club, school, or community youth sports program, nor whether the level of athletes coached were elite or beginner. Future studies could explore potential differences in concussion attitudes and behaviors among coaches of recreational versus elite level programs.

5. Conclusion

Most coaches in this study report having access to education and attitudes consistent with best practices about concussion safety; however, over-all access to concussion-related resources is limited. Future studies can assess strategies to tailor educational messages and trainings to reduce disparities in access to concussion prevention and management resources.

6. Practical applications

Coaches bear an important part of the responsibility to prevent, identify, and manage concussions in young athletes. Tailored educational efforts may assist coaches of young athletes with recognition of concussion signs and symptoms and with feeling comfortable deciding whether an athlete needs to be evaluated for a possible concussion.

Acknowledgments

Funding

The authors disclosed that they did not receive financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Disclaimer

The findings and conclusions in this manuscript are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Footnotes

Declaration of conflicting interests

The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

From the CDC: The Journal of Safety Research has partnered with the Office of the Associate Director for Science, Division of Unintentional Injury Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control at the CDC in Atlanta, Georgia, USA, to briefly report on some of the latest findings in the research community. This report is the 56th in a series of “From the CDC” articles on injury prevention.

References

  1. Arbogast KB, Curry AE, Pfeiffer MR, et al. (2016). Point of health care entry for youth with concussion within a large pediatric care network. JAMA Pediatrics, 170(7), e160294 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2016.0294 (July 5). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Baugh CM, & Kroshus E (2014). Bourlas, et al. requiring athletes to acknowledge receipt of concussion-related information and responsibility to report symptoms: A study of the prevalence, variation, and possible improvements. The Journal of Law, Medicine, and Ethics, 42(3), 297–313. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bloodgood B, Inokuchi D, Shawver W, et al. (2013). Exploration of awareness, knowledge, and perceptions of traumatic brain injury among American youth athletes and their parents. Journal of Adolescent Health, 53(1), 34–39. 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2013.01.022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Broglio SP, Cantu RC, Gioia GA, et al. (2014). National Athletic Trainers’ association position statement: Management of sport concussion. Journal of Athletic Training, 49(2), 245–265. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2013). Results from the School Health Policies and Practices Study 2012 Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services. [Google Scholar]
  6. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2017). What is a Concussion? Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/headsup/basics/concussion_whatis.html (Accessed August 8, 2018).
  7. Chrisman SP, Quitiquit C, & Rivara FP (2013). Qualitative study of barriers to concussive symptom reporting in high school athletics. Journal of Adolescent Health, 52(3), 330–335 (e333). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Chrisman SP, Schiff MA, Chung SK, et al. (2014). Implementation of concussion legislation and extent of concussion education for athletes, parents, and coaches in Washington State. The American Journal of Sports Medicine, 42(5), 1190–1196. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Coronado VG, Haileyesus T, Cheng TA, et al. (2015). Trends in sports-and recreation-related traumatic brain injuries treated in US emergency departments: The National Electronic Injury Surveillance System-all Injury Program (NEISS-AIP) 2001–2012. The Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 30(3), 185–197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Delaney JS, Al Kashmiri A, Drummond R, et al. (2008). The effect of protective headgear on head injuries and concussions in adolescent football (soccer) players. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 42(2), 110–115 discussion 115 10.1136/bjsm.2007.037689. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. DePadilla L, Miller GF, Jones SE, et al. (2018). Self-reported concussions from playing a sport or being physically active among high school students—United States, 2017. MMWR, 67 (24), 682–685 June 22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Ellis P (2010). The essential guide to effect sizes: Statistical power, meta-analysis, and the interpretation of research results Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
  13. Enniss TM, Basiouny K, Brewer B, et al. (2018). Primary prevention of contact sports-related concussions in amateur athletes: A systematic review from the eastern Association for the Surgery of trauma. Trauma Surgery & Acute Care Open, 3(1), e000153. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Giza CC, Kutcher JS, Ashwal S, et al. (2013). Summary of evidence-based guideline update: Evaluation and management of concussion in sports report of the guideline development Subcommittee of the American Academy of neurology. Neurology, 80(24), 2250–2257. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Harmon KG, Drezner JA, Gammons M, et al. (2013). American medical Society for Sports Medicine position statement: Concussion in sport. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 47(1), 15–26. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Harvey H (2013). Reducing traumatic brain injuries in youth sports: Youth sports traumatic brain injury state laws, January 2009–December 2012. American Journal of Public Health, 103 (7), 1249–1254. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Harvey HH, Koller DL, & Lowrey KM (2015). The four stages of youth sports TBI policymaking: Engagement, enactment, research, and reform. The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 43(1_suppl), 87–90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Kroshus E, Babkes Stellino M, Chrisman SPD, et al. (2017). Threat, pressure, and communication about concussion safety: Implications for parent concussion education. Health Education & Behavior, 45(2), 254–261. 10.1177/1090198117715669. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Kroshus E, Gillard D, Haarbauer-Krupa J, Goldman RE, & Bickham DS (2016). Talking with young children about concussions: An exploratory study. Child: Care, Health and Development, 43(5), 758–767. 10.1111/cch.12433 Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Department of Family Medicine, Brown University Center for Primary Care and Prevention Pawtucket, RI, USA Research scientist, Boston Children’s Hospital, Center for Media and Child Health Boston, MA, USA. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Kroshus E, Rivara FP, Whitlock KB, et al. (2017). Disparities in athletic trainer staffing in secondary school sport: Implications for concussion identification. Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine, 27(6), 542–547. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Marar M, McIlvain NM, Fields SK, & Comstock RD (2012). Epidemiology of concussions among United States high school athletes in 20 sports. The American Journal of Sports Medicine, 40(4), 747–755. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. McCrea M, Guskiewicz K, Randolph C, et al. (2013). Incidence, clinical course, and predictors of prolonged recovery time following sport-related concussion in high school and college athletes. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 19(1), 22–33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. McCrory P, Meeuwisse W, Dvorak J, et al. (2017). Consensus statement on concussion in sport—the 5th International Conference on concussion in sport held in Berlin, October 2016. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 51(11) bjsports-2017-097699. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. McLeod TCV, Schwartz C, & Bay RC (2007). Sport-related concussion misunderstandings among youth coaches. Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine, 17(2), 140–142. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Mirabelli MH, Devine MJ, Singh J, & Mendoza M (2015). The preparticipation sports evaluation. American Family Physician, 92(5), 371–376. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Mitchell JH, Haskell W, Snell P, & Van Camp SP (2005). Task force 8: Classification of sports. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 45(8), 1364–1367. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Moses S (2018). Sports Contact Levels Retrieved from https://fpnotebook.com/sports/Exam/SprtsCntctLvls.htm.
  28. Pfister T, Pfister K, Hagel B, Ghali WA, & Ronksley PE (2015). The incidence of concussion in youth sports: A systematic review and meta-analysis. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 50(5), 292–297. 10.1136/bjsports-2015-094978. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Rice SG (2008). Medical conditions affecting sports participation. Pediatrics, 121(4), 841–848. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Rivara FP, Schiff MA, Chrisman SPD, et al. (2014). The effect of coach education on reporting of concussions among high school athletes after passage of a concussion law. The American Journal of Sports Medicine, 42(5), 1197–1203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Rosenthal JA, Foraker RE, Collins CL, et al. (2014). National high school athlete concussion rates from 2005–2006 to 2011–2012. The American Journal of Sports Medicine, 42(7), 1710–1715. 10.1177/0363546514530091. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Waltzman D, & Sarmiento K (2019). What the research says about concussion risk factors and prevention strategies for youth sports: A scoping review of six commonly played sports Unpublished. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  33. Zaiontz C (2013). Effect size for chi-square test. Real Statistics Using Excel Retrieved from http://www.real-statistics.com/chi-square-and-f-distributions/effect-size-chi-square/.
  34. Zemek R, Barrowman N, Freedman SB, et al. (2016). Clinical risk score for persistent postconcussion symptoms among children with acute concussion in the ED. JAMA, 315(10), 1014–1025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES