Global regulatory systems play a prominent role in controlling the P. aeruginosa T3SS and include the Gac/RsmA, c-di-GMP, and Vfr-cAMP signaling pathways. Many of these pathways appear to directly or indirectly influence exsA transcription or translation. In this study, the histone-like proteins MvaT and MvaU are added to the growing list of global regulators that control the T3SS. MvaT and MvaU bind AT-rich regions in the genome and silence xenogeneic genes, including pathogenicity islands. The T3SS gene cluster has been horizontally transmitted among many Gram-negative pathogens. Control by MvaT/MvaU may reflect a residual effect that has persisted since the initial acquisition of the gene cluster, subsequently imposing a requirement for active regulatory mechanisms to override MvaT/MvaU-mediated silencing.
KEYWORDS: ExsA, H-NS, MvaT, MvaU, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, type III secretion system
ABSTRACT
Pseudomonas aeruginosa is an opportunistic Gram-negative pathogen capable of causing severe disease in immunocompromised individuals. A major P. aeruginosa virulence factor is the type III secretion system (T3SS). The T3SS is used to translocate effector proteins into host cells, causing cytotoxicity. The T3SS is under the transcriptional control of the master regulator ExsA. ExsA is encoded in the exsCEBA operon and autoregulates transcription via the PexsC promoter. There is also a Vfr-dependent promoter (PexsA) located in the intergenic region between exsB and exsA. A previous chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP)-on-chip experiment identified strong binding signatures for MvaT and MvaU in the intergenic region containing the PexsA promoter. MvaT and MvaU are DNA-binding histone-like nucleoid-structuring proteins that can repress gene expression. As predicted from the previous ChIP data, purified MvaT specifically bound to the PexsA promoter region in electrophoretic mobility shift assays. Whereas disruption of mvaT or mvaU by either transposon insertion or clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat interference (CRISPRi) derepressed PexsA promoter activity and T3SS gene expression, overexpression of MvaT or MvaU inhibited PexsA promoter activity. Disruption of mvaT, however, did not suppress the Vfr requirement for PexsA promoter activity. Mutated MvaT/MvaU defective in transcriptional silencing exhibited dominant negative activity, resulting in a significant increase in PexsA promoter activity. Because no effect of MvaT or MvaU on Vfr expression was detected, we propose a model in which the primary effect of MvaT/MvaU on T3SS gene expression is through direct silencing of the PexsA promoter.
IMPORTANCE Global regulatory systems play a prominent role in controlling the P. aeruginosa T3SS and include the Gac/RsmA, c-di-GMP, and Vfr-cAMP signaling pathways. Many of these pathways appear to directly or indirectly influence exsA transcription or translation. In this study, the histone-like proteins MvaT and MvaU are added to the growing list of global regulators that control the T3SS. MvaT and MvaU bind AT-rich regions in the genome and silence xenogeneic genes, including pathogenicity islands. The T3SS gene cluster has been horizontally transmitted among many Gram-negative pathogens. Control by MvaT/MvaU may reflect a residual effect that has persisted since the initial acquisition of the gene cluster, subsequently imposing a requirement for active regulatory mechanisms to override MvaT/MvaU-mediated silencing.
INTRODUCTION
Members of the histone-like nucleoid-structuring protein (H-NS) family of proteins are found in many Gram-negative bacteria and function as global regulators of gene expression. Most studies of H-NS have been performed in Escherichia coli. E. coli H-NS serves a regulatory role and binds to hundreds of loci, repressing over a thousand different genes (1). Many of the repressed genes were acquired horizontally (1). Additionally, H-NS can play a structural role by bridging and compacting DNA (2–4). H-NS and related proteins consist of a coiled-coil amino-terminal dimerization domain and a carboxy-terminal DNA-binding domain connected by a flexible linker (5–10). The central area of the protein (part of the amino-terminal domain and linker) is involved in mediating formation of higher-order oligomers consisting of more than two dimers (8, 11). Using these domains, H-NS binds to curved AT-rich DNA and then oligomerizes across adjacent DNA to repress gene expression (12). These curved AT-rich regions are often found in promoter regions and xenogeneic DNA (1, 13–16). Such xenogeneic loci include prophages and pathogenicity islands, which have a lower GC content compared to GC-rich Gram-negative genomes. The H-NS-DNA nucleoprotein complex then silences target genes either by occluding RNA polymerase (RNAP) from the promoter or by trapping RNAP between two bridged sections of DNA (17, 18). Transcription factors can compete with H-NS for promoter regions to initiate transcription. Additionally, bridged DNA is refractory to elongating RNAP and can force transcriptional pausing, but RNAP can displace H-NS linearly bound to DNA (19).
H-NS family members are also found in nonenteric Gram-negative bacteria, including the pseudomonads. Pseudomonas aeruginosa is an opportunistic Gram-negative pathogen capable of causing severe disease in immunocompromised individuals. P. aeruginosa encodes two H-NS family proteins, MvaT and MvaU (20, 21). Like other H-NS-like proteins, MvaT and MvaU preferentially bind curved AT-rich DNA (22, 23) and have the same protein domains as E. coli H-NS (24). MvaT was originally described as a global regulator of virulence gene expression (25). MvaT and MvaU have overlapping regulons (22) and can interact with each other to form homomeric and/or heteromeric filaments (24). MvaT and MvaU also negatively regulate their own transcription and transcription of each other (24, 26).
MvaT controls the expression of at least 150 genes, including those encoding virulence factors and surface structures, such as fimbriae (26). In the P. aeruginosa reference strain PAO1, MvaT and MvaU silence prophage genes, preventing activation and lysis by the Pf4 phage (27). Due to this essential function, PAO1 can tolerate deletion of either mvaT or mvaU but not both (27). MvaT and MvaU directly bind to more than 100 loci, encoding 394 and 311 genes, respectively (22). These loci are AT-rich and mostly overlap for MvaT and MvaU binding (22). One region bound by both MvaT and MvaU is located in the major regulatory locus of the type III secretion system (T3SS) (22). The T3SS is a molecular machine found in many Gram-negative bacteria that functions to translocate effector proteins into the eukaryotic host cell cytosol. The P. aeruginosa T3SS translocates exotoxins (ExoS, ExoT, ExoU, and/or ExoY) that manipulate host cell signaling and/or cause cytotoxicity (28).
The T3SS is under the transcriptional control of the master regulator ExsA (29). A schematic of the exsA locus is shown in Fig. 1. ExsA is encoded in an operon beginning with exsC and autoregulates its transcription via the PexsC promoter (29). ExsA is also transcribed from another promoter, PexsA, which is located in the intergenic region between exsB and exsA (30). The PexsA promoter is under the transcriptional control of the global virulence regulator Vfr, a cAMP-binding protein (30). Transcriptional regulators Fis (31) and VqsM (32) have also been reported to have positive effects on exsA transcription. Castang et al. (22) reported binding signatures for MvaT and MvaU in the T3SS locus, centered around the PexsA promoter (Fig. 1). In this study, we demonstrate that disruption of mvaT or mvaU, by clean deletion, transposon (Tn) insertion, or clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat interference (CRISPRi), increases T3SS gene expression. Conversely, overexpression of mvaT or mvaU decreases T3SS gene expression. Deletion of mvaT does not suppress the requirement of Vfr for transcription from the PexsA promoter. Finally, MvaT specifically binds to the PexsA promoter in vitro. We conclude that MvaT and MvaU inhibit the T3SS by directly silencing Vfr-dependent transcription from the PexsA promoter.
FIG 1.
Diagram of the T3SS regulatory locus. Promoter regions that control transcription of the exsCEBA operon (PexsC), exsA (PexsA), and the exsD to pscL operon (PexsD) are indicated by arrows. Brackets indicate the MvaT and MvaU binding regions, based on data from Castang et al. (22), and the region used for the PexsA EMSA probe (Fig. 4). Percent GC content is indicated for each bracketed region.
RESULTS
Tn insertion mvaT and mvaU mutants have increased T3SS gene expression.
A previous study reported chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP)-on-chip binding signatures for MvaT and MvaU in the T3SS locus, centered around the 297-bp exsB-exsA intergenic region (22) (Fig. 1). More recently, the same intergenic region was shown to contain an exsA-specific promoter (PexsA) (30, 32). We hypothesized that MvaT and MvaU control T3SS gene expression by modulating PexsA promoter activity. To test this, we first used the mvaT::Tn and mvaU::Tn mutants from the P. aeruginosa PA14 nonredundant Tn insertion library (33). The exsA::Tn mutant, which is completely defective for T3SS gene expression, was used as a negative control. The Tn insertion site in each mutant was verified by PCR (see Fig. S1 in the supplemental material). Growth curves determined in liquid culture (LB) at 37°C indicated that the Tn insertions had no significant effect on growth (Fig. S2A). MvaT and MvaU were shown previously to negatively regulate production of pyocyanin (22, 25, 34). Consistent with this, the PA14 mvaT and mvaU Tn mutants produced 1.5- to 1.7-fold more pyocyanin than the wild-type (wt) PA14 strain (Fig. 2A).
FIG 2.
MvaT and MvaU inhibit pyocyanin production and T3SS gene expression in strain PA14. The wt PA14 strain and exsA, mvaT, and mvaU Tn insertion mutants (A to C) and wt PA14 carrying MvaT and MvaU expression plasmids (D to F) were cultured at 37°C and assayed for pyocyanin production (A and D) and T3SS gene expression (B, C, E, and F). MvaT and MvaU expression from PBAD was induced by addition of 0.02% arabinose (pMvaT and pMvaT*) or 0.1% arabinose (vector control [V], pMvaU, and pMvaU*). (A and D) The pyocyanin data are relative to the wt strain or the vector strain, normalized to 100%. (B and E) The indicated strains carrying the PexsA-lacZ or PexsD-lacZ transcriptional reporter were cultured under noninducing or inducing (with EGTA) conditions for T3SS gene expression and were assayed for β-galactosidase activity. (C and F) Supernatant (Sup) and lysate (Lys) samples from the same cultures were immunoblotted for ExoU, PcrV, and ExsA. Error bars represent the standard deviations of at least three biological replicates. The indicated statistical differences are relative to wt PA14 (A to C) or the vector control (D to F). *, P ≤ 0.05; **, P ≤ 0.01; ***, P ≤ 0.001; ****, P ≤ 0.0001.
To monitor T3SS gene expression, we used two transcriptional reporters. The PexsD-lacZ reporter measures activity from the ExsA-dependent PexsD promoter (35), and the PexsA-lacZ reporter measures activity from the Vfr-dependent PexsA promoter (30). Strains were cultured under noninducing (high Ca2+ levels, without EGTA) and inducing (low Ca2+ levels, with EGTA) conditions for T3SS gene expression and assayed for β-galactosidase activity. Under noninducing conditions, PexsD-lacZ reporter activity was minimal in wt PA14 and each of the Tn insertion strains (Fig. 2B). Reporter activity increased 8-fold in wt PA14 cultured under inducing conditions and remained defective in the exsA mutant. Disruption of either mvaT or mvaU resulted in an ∼2-fold increase in reporter activity, relative to wt PA14 cultured under inducing conditions. Similarly, PexsA-lacZ transcriptional reporter activity increased above wt levels when either mvaT or mvaU was disrupted (Fig. 2B). Whereas the mvaT::Tn mutant demonstrated increased PexsA-lacZ activity under both noninducing and inducing conditions, activity was significantly increased for the mvaU::Tn mutant only under inducing conditions. Consistent with the increase in PexsA-lacZ reporter activity, ExsA levels were elevated in the whole-cell lysate fractions of the mvaT::Tn and mvaU::Tn mutants (Fig. 2C). The increase in ExsA protein levels also resulted in increased T3SS activity, as shown by elevated levels of ExoU and PcrV in the culture supernatant fractions of the mvaT::Tn and mvaU::Tn mutants (Fig. 2C). ExoU and PcrV are secreted T3SS substrates. From these data, we conclude that disruption of mvaT or mvaU derepresses T3SS gene expression in P. aeruginosa strain PA14.
Overexpression of mvaT or mvaU inhibits T3SS gene expression in strain PA14.
Based on the finding of elevated T3SS gene expression in the mvaT and mvaU Tn mutants, we hypothesized that increased MvaT or MvaU expression would inhibit T3SS gene expression. To test this, we constructed plasmids to express mvaT or mvaU from an arabinose-inducible promoter. PA14 strains were cultured under T3SS-inducing conditions in the presence of 0.02% or 0.1% arabinose to induce expression of MvaT or MvaU, respectively. Different arabinose concentrations were used to minimize growth defects resulting from MvaT or MvaU overexpression (Fig. S2B). As a control, we measured pyocyanin levels, observing a significant decrease when either MvaT or MvaU was overexpressed (Fig. 2D). As expected, overexpression of either mvaT or mvaU inhibited PexsD-lacZ reporter activity compared to the vector control (Fig. 2E). Overexpression of mvaT or mvaU reproducibly decreased PexsA-lacZ activity but not to a level of statistical significance (P = 0.85 and P = 0.77, respectively). Consistent with the transcriptional reporter data, ExsA and ExoU protein levels were reduced upon MvaT or MvaU expression (Fig. 2F).
MvaT and MvaU share 79% amino acid similarity and bind DNA as homodimers (24). MvaT and MvaU can also interact to form mixed heterodimers (9, 24). Maximal transcription silencing requires formation of higher-order oligomers (9). Previous studies found that a F36S MvaT point mutant bound DNA as a homodimer but could not form higher-order oligomers (9, 36). The MvaT F36S mutant has a dominant negative effect on cupA transcription in vivo (9). The F36 residue is conserved in MvaU. We hypothesized that MvaT and MvaU F36S mutants would no longer repress pyocyanin production or T3SS gene expression. Whereas overexpression of wt MvaT/MvaU inhibited pyocyanin production (Fig. 2D) and PexsD-lacZ reporter activity, MvaT F36S (pMvaT*) and MvaU F36S (pMvaU*) lacked inhibitory activity (Fig. 2E). Rather than inhibition, expression of MvaT F36S (pMvaT*) or MvaU F36S (pMvaU*) significantly increased pyocyanin production. We also observed significant increases in PexsD-lacZ and PexsA-lacZ activity upon MvaT F36S expression, consistent with the previous report of dominant negative activity (9). That activity is even more dramatic than the effect of disrupting either mvaT or mvaU (Fig. 2B) and likely results from nonproductive interaction of MvaT F36S with wt MvaT and/or MvaU. We did not observe a dramatic increase in T3SS protein levels by Western blotting, although there was a slight increase in ExoU secretion when MvaU F36S was expressed (Fig. 2F). From these data, we conclude that MvaT and MvaU overexpression represses T3SS gene expression in strain PA14.
CRISPRi knockdown of mvaU in a ΔmvaT background stimulates T3SS gene expression in strain PA103.
To verify our findings from the PA14 Tn mutants, we constructed unmarked in-frame deletion mutants of mvaT and mvaU in P. aeruginosa strain PA103. Attempts to construct a double mutant were unsuccessful, which supports the prior conclusion that loss of both mvaT and mvaU is lethal (22, 27). Similar to our findings with strain PA14, deletion of mvaT or mvaU significantly derepressed PexsD-lacZ and PexsA-lacZ reporter activity in strain PA103 when cells were cultured under inducing conditions (with EGTA) (Fig. 3A). Deletion of mvaT also increased PexsD-lacZ reporter activity more than 4-fold compared to the wt PA103 strain under noninducing conditions (without EGTA).
FIG 3.

MvaT inhibits the T3SS in strain PA103. (A) The indicated strains carrying the PexsA-lacZ or PexsD-lacZ reporter were cultured at 37°C under noninducing (without EGTA) or inducing (with EGTA) conditions and were assayed for β-galactosidase activity. (B and C) PA103 strains carrying Plac-dcas9, the PexsD-lacZ (B) or PexsA-lacZ (C) reporter, and sgRNA expression plasmids or a vector control (−) were cultured at 37°C under inducing conditions for expression of T3SS genes and dcas9 and were assayed for β-galactosidase activity The indicated statistical differences are relative to the wt PA103 control (A) or the vector control for each strain (B and C). Error bars represent standard deviations across at least three biological replicates. *, P ≤ 0.05; **, P ≤ 0.01; ***, P ≤ 0.001.
Our finding that deletion of either mvaT or mvaU leads to elevated PexsA-lacZ reporter activity suggests that both participate in the silencing of PexsA promoter activity. Testing this prediction requires measurement of PexsA-lacZ reporter activity in the absence of both mvaT and mvaU. Because mutation of both mvaT and mvaU appears to be lethal, we utilized CRISPRi (37, 38) to repress mvaU transcription in wt P. aeruginosa and the mvaT mutant. As a control for the efficacy of the CRISPRi system, we targeted exsC, which is essential for T3SS gene expression (39). Targeted repression of exsC greatly diminished (60-fold) PexsD-lacZ activity compared to the vector control (Fig. 3B), and targeting of mvaU led to a modest but reproducible increase in PexsD-lacZ activity. Next, we evaluated PexsA-lacZ reporter in wt PA103 and the ΔmvaT strain while targeting mvaU (Fig. 3C). Whereas depletion of mvaU in the wt background had no significant effect on PexsA-lacZ activity, targeting of mvaU for CRISPRi depletion in the ΔmvaT mutant resulted in a significant increase over the value seen for the vector control. From these data, we conclude that MvaT and MvaU function together to control PexsA promoter activity.
MvaT specifically binds the exsA promoter in vitro.
MvaT and MvaU preferentially interact with AT-rich DNA (22, 23). The PexsA promoter region (Fig. 1) has an AT content of 55%, which is significantly higher than the average AT content of the P. aeruginosa genome (∼32%). To confirm that MvaT binds the exsA promoter region, we performed electrophoretic mobility shift assays (EMSAs) with recombinant histidine-tagged MvaT. We were unable to purify histidine-tagged MvaU because overexpression severely inhibited E. coli growth. Incubation of 150 nM MvaT with labeled PexsA promoter probe resulted in the formation of a MvaT-PexsA complex (Fig. 4A). To demonstrate specific binding of MvaT to the PexsA promoter region, we performed competition experiments by radiolabeling the PexsA promoter probe and adding excess unlabeled DNA to compete for MvaT binding. As a positive control, we first added an excess of unlabeled PmvaU promoter probe, a known MvaT target. Addition of a 25-fold molar excess of the PmvaU probe interfered with the MvaT-PexsA interaction, and a 125-fold excess completely eliminated observable MvaT binding. Similarly, addition of an unlabeled PexsA promoter fragment resulted in a dose-dependent loss of binding comparable to that observed with the PmvaU competitor. As a negative control, we added a 125-fold excess of a nonspecific algD probe, and we observed no disruption of MvaT-PexsA binding. The experiment was also performed in reverse, by radiolabeling PmvaU and titrating unlabeled PmvaU or PexsA promoter probe (Fig. S3). Once again, PmvaU and PexsA competed for MvaT binding, whereas the nonspecific algD probe did not.
FIG 4.

His-tagged MvaT directly interacts with the exsA promoter region in vitro. MvaT (150 nM) was incubated for 15 min at 25°C with 0.125 nM radiolabeled PexsA promoter probe and increasing concentrations (the indicated fold molar excess) of unlabeled DNA (A, PmvaU or PexsA; B, Pvfr or PexsD). Unlabeled PmvaU and algD were used as positive and negative controls, respectively. Arrows indicate the positions of unbound PexsA and the MvaT-PexsA promoter probe complexes. Representative data from three replicate experiments are shown.
MvaT and MvaU regulate T3SS gene expression through direct repression of the PexsA promoter.
Translation of ExsA is stimulated by the RNA-binding protein RsmA, through an unknown mechanism (Fig. 5A) (40, 41). When RsmA is sequestered by the small noncoding RNAs RsmY and RsmZ, ExsA is less efficiently translated (41). Previous studies found that rsmZ transcription is repressed by MvaT (22, 42). In agreement with those data, we found that PrsmZ-lacZ and PrsmY-lacZ reporter activities were both decreased by MvaT or MvaU overexpression in wt strain PA103 compared to the vector control (Fig. 5B) and that deletion of either mvaT or mvaU resulted in elevated PrsmZ-lacZ and PrsmY-lacZ reporter activity. These findings, however, are opposite of the results expected if MvaT/MvaU effects on RsmYZ overexpression affect T3SS gene expression, because liberating RsmA should increase ExsA expression and T3SS gene expression. Thus, the effect of MvaT/MvaU on T3SS gene expression is expected to function independently from the Rsm system.
FIG 5.

(A) The schematic shows MvaT/MvaU regulation of exsA. (B) MvaT and MvaU repress PrsmZ-lacZ and PrsmY-lacZ reporter activity. Strains carrying the PrsmY-lacZ or PrsmZ-lacZ reporter were cultured at 37°C under T3SS-inducing conditions and were assayed for β-galactosidase activity. Error bars represent the standard deviations of three biological replicates. The indicated statistical differences are relative to the wt PA103 vector control. **, P ≤ 0.01; ***, P ≤ 0.001; ****, P ≤ 0.0001.
The previously determined ChIP-on-chip signature for the exsB-exsA intergenic region extended downstream to include the exsD promoter region (located just downstream of exsA) (Fig. 1) (22). In addition to upstream inhibition of PexsA promoter activity (and ExsA synthesis) by MvaT/MvaU, our observation of reduced PexsD-lacZ transcriptional reporter activity (Fig. 2 and 3) raised the possibility of a direct effect on the PexsD promoter. To examine this, we performed competition experiments with unlabeled PexsD promoter probe and radiolabeled PexsA (Fig. 4B) promoter probe; we observed no disruption of the MvaT-PexsA interaction with a 125-fold excess of PexsD. These data indicate that MvaT does not bind directly to the PexsD promoter.
The PexsA promoter is under the transcriptional control of the cAMP-binding protein Vfr (30). Vfr autoregulates its own transcription from the Pvfr promoter (43, 44). To determine whether MvaT influences vfr transcription, competition experiments were performed with an excess of unlabeled Pvfr promoter probe, but no evidence of MvaT binding was observed (Fig. 4B). Additionally, immunoblots revealed no changes in Vfr expression upon MvaT or MvaU overexpression in strains PA14, PA103, and PAK (Fig. 6). The effects of MvaT and MvaU on PexsA promoter activity, therefore, are direct and do not involve alteration of vfr expression.
FIG 6.

MvaT does not affect Vfr levels. Strains carrying the indicated expression plasmids were cultured at 37°C under inducing conditions (with EGTA) and were assayed for Vfr production by immunoblotting. MvaT/MvaU expression was induced from PBAD with either 0.02% arabinose (pMvaT and pMvaT* in strain PA14) or 0.1% arabinose (vector control [V], pMvaU, pMvaU*, and all plasmids in PAK).
Vfr activation of T3SS gene expression is not dependent on MvaT.
We previously proposed that Vfr activates the PexsA promoter through recruitment of RNAP (30). The involvement of MvaT/MvaU suggested another potential mechanism accounting for the Vfr requirement. Rather than direct activation through recruitment of RNAP, Vfr could indirectly stimulate transcription by displacing MvaT/MvaU from the promoter region, thus relieving their inhibitory effects. To test this, we generated a vfr mvaT double mutant in strain PA103 and measured PexsD-lacZ and PexsA-lacZ reporter activity and ExsA expression under inducing conditions (Fig. 7). Whereas deletion of vfr resulted in significant decreases in ExsA synthesis and PexsD-lacZ and PexsA-lacZ reporter activities, deletion of mvaT increased activity 1.7- to 2.5-fold over wt levels. The phenotypes of the vfr single mutant and the vfr mvaT double mutant were identical, showing that vfr is epistatic to mvaT, that Vfr is required even in the absence of mvaT, and that Vfr functions as a direct activator of the PexsA promoter.
FIG 7.

Vfr is required for ExsA transcription from PexsA irrespective of MvaT. Strains carrying the PexsA-lacZ or PexsD-lacZ reporter were cultured at 37°C under inducing conditions (with EGTA) and assayed for β-galactosidase activity and ExsA synthesis. The immunoblot is representative of two biological replicates. Error bars represent the standard deviations of at least three biological replicates. The indicated statistical differences are relative to the wt PA103 control. ***, P ≤ 0.001; ****, P ≤ 0.0001.
Control of T3SS gene expression by MvaT/MvaU in strain PAK.
Strains PA14 and PA103 are ExoU positive and ExoS negative and are representative of only ∼30% of sequenced P. aeruginosa genomes (45); the remaining ∼70% are ExoU negative and ExoS positive. To ensure that our findings with MvaT/MvaU are translatable to ExoU-negative and ExoS-positive strains, we performed CRISPRi and MvaT/MvaU expression studies in strain PAK. Depletion of mvaT or mvaU by CRISPRi resulted in a significant increase in PexsD-lacZ reporter activity (Fig. S4A). The effects of MvaT or MvaU overexpression, however, were more modest than those observed in strains PA14 and PA103, with significance being observed only for PexsD-lacZ reporter activity and ExoS production upon MvaT expression. Overexpression of the dominant negative MvaT F36S in strain PAK significantly increased PexsD-lacZ and PexsA-lacZ activity compared to the vector control, and MvaT F36S significantly increased PexsD-lacZ activity. From these data, we conclude that MvaT and MvaU show common trends toward inhibition of PexsA promoter activity in strains PA14, PA103, and PAK, with some minor strain variability in the overall levels of activity.
DISCUSSION
A previous study using ChIP-on-chip found that the H-NS-like proteins MvaT and MvaU bind in vivo to the exsB-exsA intergenic region, which is now known to contain the PexsA promoter (22, 30). In this study, we confirm specific binding of MvaT to the Vfr-dependent PexsA promoter region in vitro and repression of PexsA promoter activity in vivo. MvaT and MvaU are global regulators that bind to more than 100 chromosomal loci in P. aeruginosa (22). While our data show specific MvaT/MvaU-mediated repression of exsA transcription, control of T3SS gene expression is complex and involves numerous additional regulators (30–32, 41, 46–53). Thus, we also considered potential indirect effects of MvaT/MvaU on T3SS gene expression. Neither MvaT nor MvaU was previously reported to bind the Pvfr promoter region (22). This is consistent with our EMSA data and immunoblots showing no MvaT binding to the Pvfr promoter region or effects on Vfr expression (Fig. 4B and 6). The ChIP-on-chip signature for MvaT in the exsB-exsA intergenic region was broad and extended downstream of exsA to include the PexsD promoter region (Fig. 1) (22). The PexsD promoter controls transcription of the 12-gene exsD-pscL operon (54). Because most of those genes are structural subunits of the T3SS and T3SS gene expression is intimately linked to secretory activity through the ExsACDE partner-switching mechanism, reduced expression of secretory genes results in feedback inhibition of T3SS gene expression (35, 39, 54). Nevertheless, our data indicate that MvaT does not directly bind to the PexsD promoter (Fig. 4B). It remains possible that some indirect silencing of the PexsD promoter occurs through MvaT/MvaU binding to the PexsA promoter, with subsequent oligomerization that extends downstream to the PexsD promoter. MvaT also regulates transcription of the small noncoding RNA rsmZ (22, 42) and, as reported herein, rsmY (Fig. 5B). RsmY and RsmZ function by sequestering the RNA-binding protein RsmA, which appears to promote ExsA translation (41). Reduced RsmY/RsmZ expression should increase RsmA availability and stimulate T3SS gene expression (41). Our finding that MvaT and MvaU inhibit both RsmY/RsmZ expression (Fig. 5B) (42) and T3SS gene expression (Fig. 2 and 3; also see Fig. S4 in the supplemental material) is opposite to the expected result. These combined data suggest that the primary influence of MvaT/MvaU on T3SS gene expression is independent of Vfr and the Rsm system and instead involves direct effects on the Vfr-dependent PexsA promoter. Involvement of other MvaT/MvaU-controlled genes that contribute to T3SS gene expression, however, remains a possibility.
H-NS-mediated repression of T3SS gene expression is a common theme. In Yersinia pseudotuberculosis, the small histone-like protein YmoA negatively regulates the transcription of lcrF, the primary activator of the T3SS (55). Deletion of E. coli H-NS is required for high-level expression of the Yersinia T3SS in E. coli (56). In enteropathogenic and enterohemorrhagic E. coli, H-NS silences expression of the T3SS-associated locus for enterocyte attachment and effacement (57, 58). The primary regulator of the E. coli T3SS (Ler) activates transcription by antagonizing H-NS-mediated silencing (57, 59). Involvement of H-NS in repression of T3SS gene expression is also seen in Salmonella enterica, Shigella flexneri, and the plant pathogen Xanthomonas oryzae (60–62).
In Vibrio parahaemolyticus, T3SS-1 is controlled by an exsA homolog (63). Whereas H-NS inhibits transcription of V. parahaemolyticus exsA, HlyU activates transcription by antagonizing the inhibitory activity of H-NS (64). A similar relationship may exist in P. aeruginosa. Vfr (30), Fis (31), and VqsM (32) are positive regulators of the PexsA promoter region. Using a double mutant lacking both vfr and mvaT, we found that Vfr was required for PexsA promoter activity irrespective of whether MvaT was present or absent (Fig. 7). Although we have excluded Vfr, Fis or VqsM may activate exsA transcription through H-NS antagonism. There may also be differential or conditional requirements for factors acting positively at the PexsA promoter. Transcription of rsmZ is positively controlled by GacA and BswR and is repressed by MvaT (42, 65, 66). Whereas activation by GacA is essential for rsmZ expression, activation by BswR is required only when MvaT is present (66). It remains possible that the requirement for VqsM and/or Fis is conditional, depending on the MvaT/MvaU status in the cell.
MvaT and MvaU bind to similar regions of the genome, share considerable overlap in their respective regulons, and are thought to play redundant roles in gene silencing (22). Our data are consistent with MvaT and MvaU redundancy, as disruption of either one by Tn insertion, deletion, or CRISPRi generated similar effects on T3SS gene expression, although some minor strain-to-strain variation was noted. Previous reports found MvaT to play a more dominant role, as some phenotypes are more pronounced for the mvaT mutant (24, 26, 42). This may reflect differences in the relative affinities of MvaT and MvaU for some promoter regions. There is also the potential for compensatory effects because MvaT and MvaU repress the transcription of one another (24). Therefore, deletion of either one results in elevated expression of the other, which probably accounts for the relatively modest effects (2-fold at best) on T3SS gene expression we observed for the individual deletion mutants. Redundancy is also consistent with the dramatic increase in PexsA-lacZ reporter activity observed for the mvaT mutant when mvaU function was disrupted by CRISPRi (Fig. 3C) or upon overexpression of the dominant negative form of MvaT in wt cells (Fig. 2E; also see Fig. S4B), which likely interferes with both MvaT and MvaU function. Whereas the PAO1 mvaT mvaU double mutant is nonviable due to the reactivation of a prophage repressed by MvaT/MvaU (27), the same prophage is not found in strain PA103. This might account for the lack of a growth effect following CRISPRi of mvaU in the PA103 mvaT mutant (Fig. S5).
Although silencing of T3SS gene expression by MvaT/MvaU is evident, the role of silencing is not entirely clear. In vitro, the DNA-binding capabilities of MvaT/MvaU are moderately responsive to changes in temperature, osmolarity, and pH, but the formation of rigid filaments is not affected (36, 67). While it is possible that these changes are responsible for MvaT/MvaU regulation, a more likely explanation may lie in the underlying role for MvaT/MvaU in the silencing of xenogeneic DNA acquired by horizontal gene transfer (22, 23). Phylogenetic studies indicate that T3SSs are acquired by horizontal gene transfer (68). Whereas T3SS gene expression confers a fitness advantage under certain conditions, expression is probably disadvantageous under many other conditions, owing to energetic and other considerations. For this reason, T3SS gene expression in all microorganisms is very tightly controlled. As proposed by others, silencing of xenogeneic DNA by MvaT/MvaU likely drives evolution by permitting the acquisition of gene clusters without incurring potential fitness defects (69). This trait may drive further evolution by then imposing a requirement on the new carrier to evolve mechanisms to appropriately control expression in such a manner that the selective advantage conferred by the trait is realized.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Bacterial strains and growth conditions.
The bacterial strains used in this study are provided in Table S1 in the supplemental material. Cloning was performed using E. coli DH5α maintained on LB agar supplemented with gentamicin (15 μg/ml), kanamycin (50 μg/ml), or tetracycline (12 μg/ml), as required. MvaT was purified from Tuner DE3 E. coli maintained on LB supplemented with kanamycin (50 μg/ml) and induced with 1 mM isopropyl-β-d-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG). P. aeruginosa strains were maintained on Vogel-Bonner minimal (VBM) medium supplemented with gentamicin (80 μg/ml), carbenicillin (300 μg/ml), or tetracycline (50 μg/ml). Plac-dcas9 was induced with 1 mM IPTG. For growth curves, P. aeruginosa strains were grown overnight at 37°C, with shaking, in liquid LB with appropriate antibiotics. The following day, cultures were diluted to an optical density at 600 nm (OD600) of 0.01 in LB with the appropriate antibiotic and arabinose or IPTG, as described in the figure legends. Cultures were grown for growth curves at 37°C in a 96-well plate in a Tecan Infinite M200 microtiter plate reader. Measurements at OD600 were taken at time zero and every 30 min over a 24-h period.
Plasmid and strain construction.
Plasmids, details of plasmid construction, and primers (Integrated DNA Technologies, Coralville, IA) are listed in Tables S2 and S3. Plasmids were introduced into P. aeruginosa by electroporation (70) or conjugation from E. coli strain Sm10 (71). For reporter fusions (CTXΦ att site) and the dcas9 expression plasmid (Tn7 insertion site), pFLP2 was then introduced by either electroporation or conjugation, and pFLP2 was resolved on yeast-tryptone medium supplemented with 10% sucrose. PA103 deletion strains were constructed using homologous recombination. The Tn insertion mutants (33) were verified using primer pairs flanking exsA (primers 155609005 and 155609008), mvaT (primers 161015209 and 161015210), or mvaU (primers 161015211 and 161015212).
The mvaT deletion plasmid (pAM254) was generated by Gibson cloning of the ΔmvaT allele from the PAO1 ΔmvaT strain (24) by PCR using primers 129746433 and 129746434 and cloning into the pEXG2Tc allelic exchange vector. MvaT and MvaU expression vectors were constructed by Gibson cloning of PCR products into pJN105. pEAW025 and pEAW026 were constructed by site-directed mutagenesis with the indicated primers (Table S2) and Pfu Turbo polymerase. All constructs were confirmed by Sanger sequencing by the Iowa Institute of Human Genetics Genomics Division at the University of Iowa.
CRISPRi.
CRISPRi was implemented using pBx-Spas-sgRNA-Gm (Addgene plasmid 105232), pUC18-mini-Tn7T-Plac-dCas9 (Plac) (Addgene plasmid 105235) (38), and pTNS2 (Addgene plasmid 64968) (72). The base-pairing regions for the single guide RNAs (sgRNAs) were designed as described by Larson et al. (73). The sgRNA plasmids were generated by designing FastCloning (74) primers for PCR around pBx-Spas-sgRNA-Gm, with 5′ extensions consisting of the sgRNA base-pairing region for each targeted gene (Table S3). The PCR products were treated with DpnI (New England Biolabs) and introduced into DH5α E. coli by heat shock. The plasmids were confirmed by Sanger sequencing. pUC18-mini-Tn7T-Plac-dCas9 was integrated into the Tn7 site using the helper plasmid pTNS2 (72). The gentamicin marker was removed using pFLP2 (75), and the sgRNA plasmids were then transformed into the resulting strains. For all assays, dcas9 expression was induced by adding 1 mM IPTG. All sgRNAs targeted the template strand 5′ untranslated region of the transcript or the first third of the gene (38).
Pyocyanin measurements.
P. aeruginosa strains were grown overnight at 37°C, with shaking, in liquid LB with appropriate antibiotics. The following day, cultures were diluted to an OD600 of 0.1 in LB with the appropriate antibiotic and arabinose, as described in the figure legends. Cultures were grown at 37°C until the OD600 reached ∼1.2. Pyocyanin levels was measured at 691 nm, as described previously (76).
β-Galactosidase assays.
P. aeruginosa strains were grown overnight at 37°C, with shaking, in liquid LB with appropriate antibiotics. The following day, cultures were diluted to an OD600 of 0.1 in tryptic soy broth with 1% glycerol, 100 mM monosodium glutamate (MSG), 2 mM EGTA, the appropriate antibiotic, and arabinose or IPTG, as described in the figure legends. Cultures were grown at 37°C, with shaking, and were harvested when the OD600 reached ∼1.0. β-Galactosidase activity was measured with the substrate o-nitrophenyl-β-galactoside (ONPG) (PexsD-lacZ and PrsmZ-lacZ) or chlorophenol red-β-d-galactopyranoside (CPRG) (PexsA-lacZ), as described previously (30, 39). Miller and CPRG units are reported as averages of at least three experiments, with error bars representing the standard deviations. Statistical significance was determined by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) or an unpaired t test, using GraphPad Prism.
Immunoblots.
Whole-cell fractions were prepared by growing P. aeruginosa strains as for the β-galactosidase assays and harvesting 1.25 ml when the OD600 reached ∼1.4. Whole-cell and supernatant fractions were separated by centrifugation (13,000 rpm for 5 min). Culture pellets were suspended in 250 μl of loading buffer and lysed by sonication. Supernatant proteins were precipitated by the addition of trichloroacetic acid to a final concentration of 13% and overnight incubation at 4°C. Proteins were sedimented by centrifugation (13,000 rpm for 5 min), washed with acetone, and suspended in either 15 or 30 μl of 2× loading buffer (PA14 or PAK, respectively). Cell fractions were separated by 12% SDS-PAGE and analyzed by immunoblotting with primary antibodies to Vfr (1:1,000), ExsA (1:1,000), ExoU (1:10,000), PcrV (1:10,000), and/or ExoS (1:10,000), in Tris-buffered saline with 5% skim milk and 0.1% Tween 20. Secondary antibody (horseradish peroxidase-conjugated anti-rabbit IgG antibody) was used at a 1:8,000 dilution. Blots were imaged on film (Fig. 1) or with an Azure Biosystems Sapphire imager (all other figures), using SuperSignal West Pico Plus substrate (Thermo Scientific).
EMSAs.
DNA promoter probes were generated by PCR as follows: PexsA (255 bp), primers 126323954 and 126323955; PmvaU (388 bp), primers 165186174 and 165186175; PexsD (230 bp), primers 164768881 and 164768882; Pvfr (405 bp), primers 165186172 and 165186173; algD (163 bp), primers 85333731 and 85333730). The probes were purified using a MinElute gel purification kit (Qiagen), end-labeled (1 pmol) with 10 μCi of [γ-32P]ATP (Perkin Elmer), and purified using a Qiagen QiaQuick PCR purification kit.
MvaT-His was purified from BL21 Tuner E. coli as described previously for ExsA (77), with the following modifications. Harvested cells were suspended in 16 ml binding buffer (20 mM Tris [pH 7.9], 500 mM NaCl, 5 mM imidazole, 0.5% Tween 20) supplemented with cOmplete mini protease inhibitor cocktail (Sigma-Aldrich). Cells were lysed with two passes through a microfluidizer. The cleared lysates were purified using nickel affinity chromatography. The nickel column was washed with 10 ml of binding buffer followed by 20 ml of wash buffer (20 mM Tris [pH 7.9], 500 mM NaCl, 60 mM imidazole, 0.5% Tween 20). Protein was then eluted in 1-ml fractions with elution buffer (20 mM Tris [pH 7.9], 500 mM NaCl, 1 M imidazole, 0.5% Tween 20). Fractions were assayed for protein content with the bicinchoninic acid (BCA) assay and analyzed using 12% SDS-PAGE. Peak fractions were pooled and dialyzed overnight at 4°C in 4 liters of dialysis buffer (20 mM Tris [pH 7.9], 500 mM NaCl, 1 mM dithiothreitol [DTT], 0.5% Tween 20). The dialysate was cleared of aggregates by centrifugation (100,000 × g for 1 h at 4°C) and assayed for protein content, and aliquots were flash frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80°C.
Competition EMSAs were performed as follows. Radiolabeled DNA probe (0.125 nM) in H-NS binding buffer [20 mM Tris (pH 7.5), 100 mM KCl, 1 mM DTT, 10% glycerol, 0.25 ng/μl poly(dI-dC), 100 μg/ml bovine serum albumin] was mixed with 1 μl of unlabeled DNA in a 19-μl reaction volume for 5 min at room temperature. MvaT (diluted in H-NS binding buffer) was added to a final volume of 20 μl, and the mixture was incubated for 15 min at room temperature. Each sample received 1 μl of loading dye (0.2% xylene cyanol, 50% glycerol) and was analyzed on a 5% polyacrylamide glycine gel (10 mM Tris-HCl [pH 8.0], 1 mM EDTA, 384 mM glycine) at 4°C. Gels were imaged with a FLA-7000 PhosphorImager (Fujifilm) and analyzed using MultiGauge v3.0 software (Fujifilm) or an Azure Biosystems Sapphire imager.
Supplementary Material
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health (grant R01 AI055042-13 to T.L.Y.). E.A.W.M. was supported by National Institutes of Health training grant 5T32 AI007511-23.
We thank Simon Dove for providing the PAO1 ΔmvaT mutant.
Footnotes
Supplemental material for this article may be found at https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.00054-19.
REFERENCES
- 1.Oshima T, Ishikawa S, Kurokawa K, Aiba H, Ogasawara N. 2006. Escherichia coli histone-like protein H-NS preferentially binds to horizontally acquired DNA in association with RNA polymerase. DNA Res 13:141–153. doi: 10.1093/dnares/dsl009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Spurio R, Dürrenberger M, Falconi M, La Teana A, Pon CL, Gualerzi CO. 1992. Lethal overproduction of the Escherichia coli nucleoid protein H-NS: ultramicroscopic and molecular autopsy. Mol Gen Genet 231:201–211. doi: 10.1007/BF00279792. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Dame RT, Wyman C, Goosen N. 2000. H-NS mediated compaction of DNA visualised by atomic force microscopy. Nucleic Acids Res 28:3504–3510. doi: 10.1093/nar/28.18.3504. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Liu Y, Chen H, Kenney LJ, Yan J. 2010. A divalent switch drives H-NS/DNA-binding conformations between stiffening and bridging modes. Genes Dev 24:339–344. doi: 10.1101/gad.1883510. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Dorman CJ, Hinton JC, Free A. 1999. Domain organization and oligomerization among H-NS-like nucleoid-associated proteins in bacteria. Trends Microbiol 7:124–128. doi: 10.1016/S0966-842X(99)01455-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Badaut C, Williams R, Arluison V, Bouffartigues E, Robert B, Buc H, Rimsky S. 2002. The degree of oligomerization of the H-NS nucleoid structuring protein is related to specific binding to DNA. J Biol Chem 277:41657–41666. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M206037200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Esposito D, Petrovic A, Harris R, Ono S, Eccleston JF, Mbabaali A, Haq I, Higgins CF, Hinton JCD, Driscoll PC, Ladbury JE. 2002. H-NS oligomerization domain structure reveals the mechanism for high order self-association of the intact protein. J Mol Biol 324:841–850. doi: 10.1016/S0022-2836(02)01141-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Bloch V, Yang Y, Margeat E, Chavanieu A, Augé MT, Robert B, Arold S, Rimsky S, Kochoyan M. 2003. The H-NS dimerization domain defines a new fold contributing to DNA recognition. Nat Struct Biol 10:212–218. doi: 10.1038/nsb904. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Castang S, Dove SL. 2010. High-order oligomerization is required for the function of the H-NS family member MvaT in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Mol Microbiol 78:916–931. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2010.07378.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Gordon BRG, Li Y, Cote A, Weirauch MT, Ding P, Hughes TR, Navarre WW, Xia B, Liu J. 2011. Structural basis for recognition of AT-rich DNA by unrelated xenogeneic silencing proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108:10690–10695. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1102544108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Stella S, Spurio R, Falconi M, Pon CL, Gualerzi CO. 2005. Nature and mechanism of the in vivo oligomerization of nucleoid protein H-NS. EMBO J 24:2896–2905. doi: 10.1038/sj.emboj.7600754. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Bouffartigues E, Buckle M, Badaut C, Travers A, Rimsky S. 2007. H-NS cooperative binding to high-affinity sites in a regulatory element results in transcriptional silencing. Nat Struct Mol Biol 14:441–448. doi: 10.1038/nsmb1233. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Grainger DC, Hurd D, Goldberg MD, Busby SJW. 2006. Association of nucleoid proteins with coding and non-coding segments of the Escherichia coli genome. Nucleic Acids Res 34:4642–4652. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkl542. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Lucchini S, Rowley G, Goldberg MD, Hurd D, Harrison M, Hinton JCD. 2006. H-NS mediates the silencing of laterally acquired genes in bacteria. PLoS Pathog 2:e81. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.0020081. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Navarre WW, Porwollik S, Wang Y, McClelland M, Rosen H, Libby SJ, Fang FC. 2006. Selective silencing of foreign DNA with low GC content by the H-NS protein in Salmonella. Science 313:236–238. doi: 10.1126/science.1128794. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Fang FC, Rimsky S. 2008. New insights into transcriptional regulation by H-NS. Curr Opin Microbiol 11:113–120. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2008.02.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Dorman CJ. 2004. H-NS: a universal regulator for a dynamic genome. Nat Rev Microbiol 2:391–400. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro883. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Dorman CJ. 2007. H-NS, the genome sentinel. Nat Rev Microbiol 5:157–161. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro1598. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Stoebel DM, Free A, Dorman CJ. 2008. Anti-silencing: overcoming H-NS-mediated repression of transcription in Gram-negative enteric bacteria. Microbiology 154:2533–2545. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.2008/020693-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Rosenthal RS, Rodwell VW. 1998. Purification and characterization of the heteromeric transcriptional activator MvaT of the Pseudomonas mevalonii mvaAB operon. Protein Sci 7:178–184. doi: 10.1002/pro.5560070118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Tendeng C, Soutourina OA, Danchin A, Bertin PN. 2003. MvaT proteins in Pseudomonas spp.: a novel class of H-NS-like proteins. Microbiology 149:3047–3050. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.C0125-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Castang S, McManus HR, Turner KH, Dove SL. 2008. H-NS family members function coordinately in an opportunistic pathogen. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105:18947–18952. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0808215105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Ding P, McFarland KA, Jin S, Tong G, Duan B, Yang A, Hughes TR, Liu J, Dove SL, Navarre WW, Xia B. 2015. A novel AT-rich DNA recognition mechanism for bacterial xenogeneic silencer MvaT. PLoS Pathog 11:e1004967. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1004967. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Vallet-Gely I, Donovan KE, Fang R, Joung JK, Dove SL. 2005. Repression of phase-variable cup gene expression by H-NS-like proteins in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102:11082–11087. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0502663102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Diggle SP, Winzer K, Lazdunski A, Williams P, Cámara M. 2002. Advancing the quorum in Pseudomonas aeruginosa: MvaT and the regulation of N-acylhomoserine lactone production and virulence gene expression. J Bacteriol 184:2576–2586. doi: 10.1128/JB.184.10.2576-2586.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Vallet I, Diggle SP, Stacey RE, Cámara M, Ventre I, Lory S, Lazdunski A, Williams P, Filloux A. 2004. Biofilm formation in Pseudomonas aeruginosa: fimbrial cup gene clusters are controlled by the transcriptional regulator MvaT. J Bacteriol 186:2880–2890. doi: 10.1128/JB.186.9.2880-2890.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Castang S, Dove SL. 2012. Basis for the essentiality of H-NS family members in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J Bacteriol 194:5101–5109. doi: 10.1128/JB.00932-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Hauser AR. 2009. The type III secretion system of Pseudomonas aeruginosa: infection by injection. Nat Rev Microbiol 7:654–665. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Yahr TL, Frank DW. 1994. Transcriptional organization of the trans-regulatory locus which controls exoenzyme S synthesis in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J Bacteriol 176:3832–3838. doi: 10.1128/jb.176.13.3832-3838.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Marsden AE, Intile PJ, Schulmeyer KH, Simmons-Patterson ER, Urbanowski ML, Wolfgang MC, Yahr L. 2016. Vfr directly activates exsA transcription to regulate expression of the Pseudomonas aeruginosa type III secretion system. J Bacteriol 198:1442–1450. doi: 10.1128/JB.00049-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Deng X, Li M, Pan X, Zheng R, Liu C, Chen F, Liu X, Cheng Z, Jin S, Wu W. 2017. Fis regulates type III secretion system by influencing the transcription of exsA in Pseudomonas aeruginosa strain PA14. Front Microbiol 8:669. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.00669. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Liang H, Deng X, Li X, Ye Y, Wu M. 2014. Molecular mechanisms of master regulator VqsM mediating quorum-sensing and antibiotic resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Nucleic Acids Res 42:10307–10320. doi: 10.1093/nar/gku586. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Liberati NT, Urbach JM, Miyata S, Lee DG, Drenkard E, Wu G, Villanueva J, Wei T, Ausubel FM. 2006. An ordered, nonredundant library of Pseudomonas aeruginosa strain PA14 transposon insertion mutants. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103:2833–2838. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0511100103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Li C, Wally H, Miller SJ, Lu C-D. 2009. The multifaceted proteins MvaT and MvaU, members of the H-NS family, control arginine metabolism, pyocyanin synthesis, and prophage activation in Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1. J Bacteriol 191:6211–6218. doi: 10.1128/JB.00888-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.McCaw ML, Lykken GL, Singh PK, Yahr TL. 2002. ExsD is a negative regulator of the Pseudomonas aeruginosa type III secretion regulon. Mol Microbiol 46:1123–1133. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2002.03228.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Winardhi RS, Fu W, Castang S, Li Y, Dove SL, Yan J. 2012. Higher order oligomerization is required for H-NS family member MvaT to form gene-silencing nucleoprotein filament. Nucleic Acids Res 40:8942–8952. doi: 10.1093/nar/gks669. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Qi LS, Larson MH, Gilbert LA, Doudna JA, Weissman JS, Arkin AP, Lim WA. 2013. Repurposing CRISPR as an RNA-guided platform for sequence-specific control of gene expression. Cell 152:1173–1183. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.02.022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Tan SZ, Reisch CR, Prather KLJ. 2018. A robust CRISPR interference gene repression system in Pseudomonas. J Bacteriol 200:e00575-17. doi: 10.1128/JB.00575-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Dasgupta N, Lykken GL, Wolfgang MC, Yahr TL. 2004. A novel anti-anti-activator mechanism regulates expression of the Pseudomonas aeruginosa type III secretion system. Mol Microbiol 53:297–308. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2004.04128.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Brencic A, Lory S. 2009. Determination of the regulon and identification of novel mRNA targets of Pseudomonas aeruginosa RsmA. Mol Microbiol 72:612–632. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2009.06670.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Intile PJ, Diaz MR, Urbanowski ML, Wolfgang MC, Yahr TL. 2014. The AlgZR two-component system recalibrates the RsmAYZ posttranscriptional regulatory system to inhibit expression of the Pseudomonas aeruginosa type III secretion system. J Bacteriol 196:357–366. doi: 10.1128/JB.01199-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Brencic A, McFarland KA, McManus HR, Castang S, Mogno I, Dove SL, Lory S. 2009. The GacS/GacA signal transduction system of Pseudomonas aeruginosa acts exclusively through its control over the transcription of the RsmY and RsmZ regulatory small RNAs. Mol Microbiol 73:434–445. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2009.06782.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Kanack KJ, Runyen-Janecky LJ, Ferrell EP, Suh S-J, West SEH. 2006. Characterization of DNA-binding specificity and analysis of binding sites of the Pseudomonas aeruginosa global regulator, Vfr, a homologue of the Escherichia coli cAMP receptor protein. Microbiology 152:3485–3496. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.29008-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Fuchs EL, Brutinel ED, Jones AK, Fulcher NB, Urbanowski ML, Yahr TL, Wolfgang MC. 2010. The Pseudomonas aeruginosa Vfr regulator controls global virulence factor expression through cyclic AMP-dependent and -independent mechanisms. J Bacteriol 192:3553–3564. doi: 10.1128/JB.00363-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Feltman H, Schulert G, Khan S, Jain M, Peterson L, Hauser AR. 2001. Prevalence of type III secretion genes in clinical and environmental isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Microbiology 147:2659–2669. doi: 10.1099/00221287-147-10-2659. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Li M, Long Y, Liu Y, Liu Y, Chen R, Shi J, Zhang L, Jin Y, Yang L, Bai F, Jin S, Cheng Z, Wu W. 2016. HigB of Pseudomonas aeruginosa enhances killing of phagocytes by up-regulating the type III secretion system in ciprofloxacin induced persister cells. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 6:125. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2016.00125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Chen R, Weng Y, Zhu F, Jin Y, Liu C, Pan X, Xia B, Cheng Z, Jin S, Wu W. 2016. Polynucleotide phosphorylase regulates multiple virulence factors and the stabilities of small RNAs RsmY/Z in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Front Microbiol 7:247. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00247. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Wolfgang MC, Lee VT, Gilmore ME, Lory S. 2003. Coordinate regulation of bacterial virulence genes by a novel adenylate cyclase-dependent signaling pathway. Dev Cell 4:253–263. doi: 10.1016/S1534-5807(03)00019-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Ha U-H, Kim J, Badrane H, Jia J, Baker HV, Wu D, Jin S. 2004. An in vivo inducible gene of Pseudomonas aeruginosa encodes an anti-ExsA to suppress the type III secretion system. Mol Microbiol 54:307–320. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2004.04282.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Wu W, Jin S. 2005. PtrB of Pseudomonas aeruginosa suppresses the type III secretion system under the stress of DNA damage. J Bacteriol 187:6058–6068. doi: 10.1128/JB.187.17.6058-6068.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Shen DK, Filopon D, Kuhn L, Polack B, Toussaint B. 2006. PsrA is a positive transcriptional regulator of the type III secretion system in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Infect Immun 74:1121–1129. doi: 10.1128/IAI.74.2.1121-1129.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Zhou L, Wang J, Zhang L-H. 2007. Modulation of bacterial type III secretion system by a spermidine transporter dependent signaling pathway. PLoS One 2:e1291. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0001291. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Intile PJ, Balzer GJ, Wolfgang MC, Yahr TL. 2015. The RNA helicase DeaD stimulates ExsA translation to promote expression of the Pseudomonas aeruginosa type III secretion system. J Bacteriol 197:2664–2674. doi: 10.1128/JB.00231-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Yahr TL, Goranson J, Frank DW. 1996. Exoenzyme S of Pseudomonas aeruginosa is secreted by a type III pathway. Mol Microbiol 22:991–1003. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1996.01554.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Cornelis GR, Sluiters C, Delor I, Geib D, Kaniga K, Rouvroit CL, Sory M-P, Vanooteghem J-C, Michiels T. 1991. ymoA, a Yersinia enterocolitica chromosomal gene modulating the expression of virulence functions. Mol Microbiol 5:1023–1034. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1991.tb01875.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Bartra SS, Jackson MW, Ross JA, Plano GV. 2006. Calcium-regulated type III secretion of Yop proteins by an Escherichia coli hha mutant carrying a Yersinia pestis pCD1 virulence plasmid. Infect Immun 74:1381–1386. doi: 10.1128/IAI.74.2.1381-1386.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Bustamante VH, Santana FJ, Calva E, Puente JL. 2001. Transcriptional regulation of type III secretion genes in enteropathogenic Escherichia coli: Ler antagonizes H-NS-dependent repression. Mol Microbiol 39:664–678. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2001.02209.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.García-Angulo VA, Martínez-Santos VI, Villaseñor T, Santana FJ, Huerta-Saquero A, Martínez LC, Jiménez R, Lara-Ochoa C, Téllez-Sosa J, Bustamante VH, Puente JL. 2012. A distinct regulatory sequence is essential for the expression of a subset of nle genes in attaching and effacing Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol 194:5589–5603. doi: 10.1128/JB.00190-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Shin M. 2017. The mechanism underlying Ler-mediated alleviation of gene repression by H-NS. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 483:392–396. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2016.12.132. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Olekhnovich IN, Kadner RJ. 2007. Role of nucleoid-associated proteins Hha and H-NS in expression of Salmonella enterica activators HilD, HilC, and RtsA required for cell invasion. J Bacteriol 189:6882–6890. doi: 10.1128/JB.00905-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Kane KA, Dorman CJ. 2012. VirB-mediated positive feedback control of the virulence gene regulatory cascade of Shigella flexneri. J Bacteriol 194:5264–5273. doi: 10.1128/JB.00800-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Kametani-Ikawa Y, Tsuge S, Furutani A, Ochiai H. 2011. An H-NS-like protein involved in the negative regulation of hrp genes in Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae. FEMS Microbiol Lett 319:58–64. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2011.02266.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Kodama T, Yamazaki C, Park K-S, Akeda Y, Iida T, Honda T. 2010. Transcription of Vibrio parahaemolyticus T3SS1 genes is regulated by a dual regulation system consisting of the ExsACDE regulatory cascade and H-NS. FEMS Microbiol Lett 311:10. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2010.02066.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Getz LJ, Thomas NA. 2018. The transcriptional regulator HlyU positively regulates expression of exsA, leading to type III secretion system 1 activation in Vibrio parahaemolyticus. J Bacteriol 200:e00653-17. doi: 10.1128/JB.00653-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Kay E, Humair B, Dénervaud V, Riedel K, Spahr S, Eberl L, Valverde C, Haas D. 2006. Two GacA-dependent small RNAs modulate the quorum-sensing response in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J Bacteriol 188:6026–6033. doi: 10.1128/JB.00409-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Wang C, Ye F, Kumar V, Gao Y-G, Zhang L-H. 2014. BswR controls bacterial motility and biofilm formation in Pseudomonas aeruginosa through modulation of the small RNA rsmZ. Nucleic Acids Res 42:4563–4576. doi: 10.1093/nar/gku106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Winardhi RS, Castang S, Dove SL, Yan J. 2014. Single-molecule study on histone-like nucleoid-structuring protein (H-NS) paralogue in Pseudomonas aeruginosa: MvaU bears DNA organization mode similarities to MvaT. PLoS One 9:e112246. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0112246. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Nguyen L, Paulsen IT, Tchieu J, Hueck CJ, Saier MH Jr. 2000. Phylogenetic analyses of the constituents of type III protein secretion systems. J Mol Microbiol Biotechnol 2:125–144. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Navarre WW. 2016. The impact of gene silencing on horizontal gene transfer and bacterial evolution. Adv Microb Physiol 69:157–186. doi: 10.1016/bs.ampbs.2016.07.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Choi K-H, Kumar A, Schweizer HP. 2006. A 10-min method for preparation of highly electrocompetent Pseudomonas aeruginosa cells: application for DNA fragment transfer between chromosomes and plasmid transformation. J Microbiol Methods 64:391–397. doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2005.06.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Simon R, Priefer U, Pühler A. 1983. A broad host range mobilization system for in vivo genetic engineering: transposon mutagenesis in Gram negative bacteria. Nat Biotechnol 1:784–791. doi: 10.1038/nbt1183-784. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Choi K-H, Gaynor JB, White KG, Lopez C, Bosio CM, Karkhoff-Schweizer RR, Schweizer HP. 2005. A Tn7-based broad-range bacterial cloning and expression system. Nat Methods 2:443–448. doi: 10.1038/nmeth765. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Larson MH, Gilbert LA, Wang X, Lim WA, Weissman JS, Qi LS. 2013. CRISPR interference (CRISPRi) for sequence-specific control of gene expression. Nat Protoc 8:2180–2196. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2013.132. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Li C, Wen A, Shen B, Lu J, Huang Y, Chang Y. 2011. FastCloning: a highly simplified, purification-free, sequence- and ligation-independent PCR cloning method. BMC Biotechnol 11:92. doi: 10.1186/1472-6750-11-92. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Hoang TT, Karkhoff-Schweizer RR, Kutchma AJ, Schweizer HP. 1998. A broad-host-range Flp-FRT recombination system for site-specific excision of chromosomally-located DNA sequences: application for isolation of unmarked Pseudomonas aeruginosa mutants. Gene 212:77–86. doi: 10.1016/S0378-1119(98)00130-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Kern SE, Newman DK. 2014. Measurement of phenazines in bacterial cultures. Methods Mol Biol 1149:303–310. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-0473-0_25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Brutinel ED, Vakulskas CA, Brady KM, Yahr TL. 2008. Characterization of ExsA and of ExsA-dependent promoters required for expression of the Pseudomonas aeruginosa type III secretion system. Mol Microbiol 68:657–671. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2008.06179.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.


