Skip to main content
Biology Letters logoLink to Biology Letters
. 2019 Jun 26;15(6):20180831. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2018.0831

Variation of carbon contents in eelgrass (Zostera marina) sediments implied from depth profiles

Theodor Kindeberg 1, Emilia Röhr 1,2, Per-Olav Moksnes 3, Christoffer Boström 2, Marianne Holmer 1,
PMCID: PMC6597507  PMID: 31238855

Abstract

Seagrass meadows are able to store significant amounts of organic carbon in their underlying sediment, but global estimates are uncertain partly owing to spatio-temporal heterogeneity between and within areas and species. In order to provide robust estimates, there is a need to better understand the fate of, and mechanisms behind, organic carbon storage. In this observational study, we analyse a suite of biotic and abiotic parameters in sediment cores from 47 different eelgrass (Zostera marina) beds spanning the distributional range of the Northern Hemisphere. Depth profiles of particulate organic carbon (POC) revealed three patterns of vertical distribution where POC either increased, decreased or showed no pattern with sediment depth. These categories exhibited distinct profiles of δ13C and C:N ratios, where high POC profiles had a proportionally larger storage of eelgrass-derived material whereas low POC profiles were dominated by phytoplanktonic and macroalgal material. However, high POC did not always translate into high carbon density. Nevertheless, this large-scale dataset provides evidence that the variability in organic matter source in response to natural and anthropogenic environmental changes affects the potential role of eelgrass beds as POC sinks, particularly where eelgrass decline is observed.

Keywords: sediment carbon profiles, eelgrass, biogeochemistry, carbon content

1. Introduction

Global estimates of carbon storage capacity in seagrass systems are associated with uncertainty, and there is an ongoing debate regarding the best way forward in assessing seagrass blue carbon [1]. In addition to a lack of accurate distribution estimates, there is also insufficient understanding of the variability among regions and within species [2,3].

There is considerable heterogeneity between seagrass systems, and vertical sediment depth profiles of particulate organic carbon (POC) vary in both shape and magnitude [35]. If sediment accumulation and below-ground production is constant, a pattern of decreasing POC with sediment depth implies that remineralization processes in the upper layers of the sediment are dominant, and this is typically the observed pattern in the top (0–25 cm) layers in seagrass sediments [1,3,6]. If sediment accumulation has increased recently, e.g. owing to eutrophication events, elevated POC pools in the surface sediments may also be observed. An increasing pattern of POC with depth may indicate that below-ground production contributes to the carbon content, or that environmental changes, such as changing light conditions in the water column, have occurred that depressed carbon inputs and/or released carbon to the water column in recent times, diminishing the pools of POC in the upper layers. Examples could be reduced seagrass cover or reduced seagrass productivity as a result of lower light availability [7], reduced sedimentation or erosion due to altered physical factors, such as installing protection barriers along beaches [8], or decreased eutrophication and thus a decreased input of sestonic particles [9,10].

Describing the variation in sediment depth profiles is critical for estimating the sediment carbon stock in seagrass meadows, particularly if the concentration of carbon and sediment density are extrapolated from shallow cores, as has been previously done [6]. There is a lack of studies that assess this variation for the distributional range of single species. Here we compile a global dataset of POC in eelgrass (Zostera marina L.) sediments that have been sampled with identical methods to describe the variation in sediment profiles.

2. Material and methods

Samples were collected within the Zostera Experimental Network (ZEN) in 13 different countries across the Northern Hemisphere, totalling 141 cores in 47 sites [11] (see electronic supplementary material, table S1 for coordinates of all sites and figure S1 caption for location names). At each site, 25 cm cores (n = 3) were collected within the eelgrass bed. Samples were analysed for organic carbon content (POC), organic nitrogen content (ON), stable isotopic composition (δ13C, δ15N), and sediment (dry bulk density, porosity, water content) and environmental (water depth, salinity, temperature) variables. Profiles were categorized by depth-averaged POC content (less than 2% and greater than or equal to 2%) and pooled by profile pattern based on linear regression analyses of the change in POC as a function of sediment depth (electronic supplementary material, table S1). In addition, POC, ON, δ13C and δ15N were assessed for eelgrass leaves and roots and other plant species present, including macroalgae and macrophytes, whereas literature values were used for phytoplankton [2]. To quantitatively assess the contribution of different sources to POC, a stable isotope mixing model of δ13C and δ15N was applied using the software IsoSource 1.3.1 [12]. Increments and tolerance level were set to 1% and 1, respectively, and sources are reported as the mean (±s.e.) and range of their contribution. For detailed information on sampling procedure and analyses, refer to [2].

3. Results

By examining the 47 depth profiles, three recurring patterns of POC distribution as a function of depth emerged: (a) decreasing POC with sediment depth (n = 16); (b) mixed or no apparent vertical pattern (n = 24); (c) increasing POC with sediment depth (n = 7) (figure 1; electronic supplementary material, table S1). Profiles categorized as low POC (less than 2% POC, n = 37) more commonly displayed decreasing (38%) or mixed (57%) patterns (electronic supplementary material, table S1 and figure S1). Out of the 10 profiles categorized as high POC (greater than or equal to 2% POC), increasing patterns were most common (50%) (electronic supplementary material, table S1 and figure S1). Depth profiles of δ13C and C:N ratio exhibited variable vertical zonation and were not always related to the pattern of POC profiles (figure 1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Conceptual figure of POC profile patterns and depth profiles of POC (ac), δ13C (df), and C:N ratio (gi). Squares indicate profile with mean POC greater than or equal to 2% (n = 9) and circles indicate profile with mean POC less than 2% (n = 38). Error bars show ±s.e. (n = 3) and dashed horizontal line in the conceptual figure indicates where profile stabilizes. Note that x-axes are variable and that profiles are examples of sites with the most distinctive patterns and do not reflect the bulk of the sampled profiles (electronic supplementary material, figure S1). Seagrass symbol courtesy of the Integration and Application Network (IAN), University of Maryland (ian.umces.edu/symbols).

However, in sites where POC was high (2.18 ± 0.24–8.65 ± 0.40%) and increased with depth, profiles of δ13C typically approached the signal for eelgrass-derived detritus (electronic supplementary material, figure S1). The opposite was generally true for low POC profiles and POC profiles that decreased with sediment depth (electronic supplementary material, figure S1). Here, δ13C became more depleted with depth, suggesting a relatively more important planktonic contribution to POC with depth. The same pattern was observed for C:N ratios, which often decreased with sediment depth at these sites, although this parameter was more heterogeneous (figure 1).

For all areas examined, the average (mean ± s.e., n = 1007) sediment POC, δ13C and C:N ratio were 1.27 ± 0.06%, −16.7 ± 0.2‰ and 13.06 ± 1.35, respectively (figure 2). However, many sites with higher POC values (greater than or equal to 2%) approached a δ13C similar to the average values of eelgrass leaves, roots and rhizomes (−9.5 ± 0.1, −10.1 ± 0.1 and −12.0 ± 0.2‰, respectively) (figure 2a). Contrarily, samples with δ13C resembling phytoplankton and macroalgae (−20.1 ± 0.5 and −21.0 ± 0.2‰, respectively) never exhibited high POC values (figure 2a). C:N ratios followed two distinctly different patterns where they increased (towards that of leaves and roots) with increasing POC or remained constant at a low value with increasing POC, suggesting a greater influence of macroalgae and phytoplankton-derived material in the latter (figure 2b). These features were reaffirmed when examining the relationship between δ13C and C:N ratios. While most data exhibited a δ13C and C:N ratio of macroalgal and phytoplanktonic sources, there was a distinct relationship between δ13C and C:N ratio reflecting eelgrass detritus for some sites (figure 2c). Furthermore, the stable isotope mixing model of δ13C and δ15N suggested that although macroalgae and phytoplankton combined were the dominating sources for the whole dataset (28 ± 2 and 29 ± 3%, respectively), eelgrass-derived material was dominating in areas of high POC (65 ± 5%) (electronic supplementary material, table S2). However, given the limitations of using a five-source mixing model with two variables, these results should be interpreted with caution.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Correlation between sediment POC and δ13C (a), POC and C:N ratio (b) and δ13C and C:N ratio (c). Lines indicate mean value of eelgrass leaves (light green), eelgrass roots (brown), eelgrass rhizomes (brown, dashed), phytoplankton (dark green) and macroalgae (grey, dashed). No C:N ratio was obtained for phytoplankton, and the Redfield ratio of 6.6 was used.

The relationship between POC and sediment parameters appeared to be divided in two, where high POC was primarily found in sediments with low dry bulk density (less than 0.6 g cm−3; electronic supplementary material, figure S2a), and high water content (greater than 60%; electronic supplementary material, figure S2b). This was reflected in the sediment carbon density, where one group of locations in Denmark and France showed increasing density with increasing POC, and a location in Sweden (LN) showed low carbon density independent of the POC content (electronic supplementary material, figure S2c). For low POC sites, there was a significant linear relationship between POC and carbon density (R2 = 0.48; p ≪ 0.001).

4. Discussion

The extensive dataset presented here highlights the heterogeneity among eelgrass POC profiles, where markedly different patterns of vertical POC zonation emerge, indicating large variability in carbon pools. In areas where POC decreased with depth (34% of the cores examined) similar to depth profiles in seagrass sediments in general [3,6], the shape of the vertical profile can be explained by high turnover and remineralization that successively decreases with depth as the organic matter is decomposed, provided that POC input is constant [13]. The profile may also develop, if the POC input has been increasing over the years, which may be the case in eutrophic areas. A rapid decline with depth that then stabilizes, as observed in some sites (e.g. LI, QU, MX, BC), implies that the depth where remineralization can be neglected owing to low rates is surpassed and the POC stored below that threshold can be considered buried [1]. This highlights the importance of sampling deeper cores, beyond the remineralization depth, when assessing carbon pools.

A large number of profiles (51%) exhibited vertical variability from which no distinctive pattern could be inferred (mixed profile, figure 1b). These were generally low in POC (88% less than 2% POC) and typically exhibited high within-site variability. Studies show that plant variables such as high shoot density or high below-ground biomass do not translate into high carbon content [2]. Instead, sites with low POC were generally characterized by coarser grain sizes with high sediment density, located on exposed sites (e.g. SF, LÅ, NY), suggesting that advective forces dominate over diffusive [2,4]. Consequently, these sediments may exhibit a deeper mixing depth and/or high POC remineralization [1]. However, the small-scale variability can also be due to redox oscillations owing to factors such as bioturbation [14] and radial oxygen loss from eelgrass roots [15]. Carbon pools are low in these mixed sediments which are unlikely to represent significant blue carbon systems, despite high eelgrass productivity. This emphasizes the significant role of sediment mixing, remineralization and local hydrodynamics, processes that are often overlooked in the blue carbon literature [1].

Notably, five of the 10 sites that were characterized as high POC exhibited an increase in POC across the top 25 cm (figure 1c), which contrasts with general observations of seagrass sediment profiles showing decreasing POC with depth [3,6]. The fact that δ13C profiles in the high POC sediments often followed the same increasing pattern suggests that the input of autochthonous organic matter has decreased over time, possibly owing to reduced eelgrass cover and a shift towards increased input of macroalgae and phytoplankton with faster remineralization rates [16,17]. In fact, these sites were from areas (Denmark and Sweden) where eelgrass has diminished [18]. This is an important finding as seagrasses are in decline globally and eutrophication is a ubiquitous issue which can have negative impacts on the carbon pools in seagrass beds [19].

In conclusion, this study provides important insight into the variability of POC vertical zonation in different eelgrass environments. Furthermore, we stress the importance of considering the shape of the carbon profile when extrapolating profiles from 25 to 100 cm depth, a practice common in the blue carbon literature [3,6]. Only if the core extends the mixing depth and the POC profile has stabilized can an adequate extrapolation be done. Understanding the mechanisms behind organic carbon vertical variability is imperative to assess carbon content in seagrass sediments and this study provides, we believe, a first, species-specific insight into this matter.

Supplementary Material

Electronic Supplementary Material from Factors affecting blue carbon variability in eelgrass sediments implied from depth profiles
rsbl20180831supp1.pdf (606.9KB, pdf)

Supplementary Material

Raw Data
rsbl20180831supp2.xlsx (164.3KB, xlsx)

Acknowledgements

This study was carried out as part of the Zostera Experimental Network, ZEN 2015–2018 (NSF award OCE-1336206 to J. E. Duffy). We acknowledge the following people for participating in field sampling: J. K. Baum, M. Björk, K. Boyer, D. Chin, L. Chalifour, S. Cimon, M. Cusson, M. Dahl, D. Deyanova, J. S. Eklöf, J. K. Geyer, J. N. Griffin, M. Gullström, C. M. Hereu, M. Hori, K. A. Hovel, A. R. Hughes, P. Jorgensen, S. Kiriakopolos, M. Nakaoka, M. I. O'Connor, B. Peterson, K. Reiss, P. L. Reynolds, F. Rossi, J. Ruesink, R. Santos, J. J. Stachowicz, F. Tomas, K.-S. Lee and R. K. F. Unsworth.

Data accessibility

Data are available as electronic supplementary material.

Authors' contributions

M.H. and T.K. conceived and designed the study. T.K. carried out data analysis and drafted the manuscript. E.R. and C.B. carried out data analysis and revised the manuscript. P.-O.M. collected data and revised the manuscript. All authors gave final approval for publication.

Competing interests

We declare no competing interests.

Funding

This research was supported by the Velux Foundations no. 18530 (T.K. and M.H.), the Maj and Tor Nessling Foundation (E.R., project 201600125) and the Åbo Akademi University Foundation Sr (C.B.).

References

  • 1.Johannessen SC, Macdonald RW. 2016. Geoengineering with seagrasses: is credit due where credit is given? Environ. Res. Lett. 11, 113001 ( 10.1088/1748-9326/11/11/113001) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Röhr ME, et al. 2018. Blue carbon storage capacity of temperate eelgrass (Zostera marina) meadows. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 32, 1457–1475. ( 10.1029/2018GB005941) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Lavery PS, Mateo MA, Serrano O, Rozaimi M. 2013. Variability in the carbon storage of seagrass habitats and its implications for global estimates of blue carbon ecosystem service. PLoS ONE 8, 12 ( 10.1371/journal.pone.0073748) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Röhr ME, Boström C, Canal-Vergés P, Holmer M. 2016. Blue carbon stocks in Baltic Sea eelgrass (Zostera marina) meadows. Biogeosciences 13, 6139–6153. ( 10.5194/bg-13-6139-2016) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Dahl M, Deyanova D, Gütschow S, Asplund ME, Lyimo LD, Karamfilov V, Santos R, Björk M, Gullström M. 2016. Sediment properties as important predictors of carbon storage in Zostera marina meadows: a comparison of four European areas. PLoS ONE 11, e0167493 ( 10.1371/journal.pone.0167493) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Fourqurean JW, et al. 2012. Seagrass ecosystems as a globally significant carbon stock. Nat. Geosci. 5, 505–509. ( 10.1038/ngeo1477) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Macreadie PI, Trevathan-Tackett SM, Skilbeck CG, Sanderman J, Curlevski N, Jacobsen G, Seymour JR. 2015. Losses and recovery of organic carbon from a seagrass ecosystem following disturbance. Proc. R. Soc. B 282, 20151537 ( 10.1098/rspb.2015.1537) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Cabaço S, Santos R, Duarte CM. 2008. The impact of sediment burial and erosion on seagrasses: a review. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 79, 354–366. ( 10.1016/j.ecss.2008.04.021) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Samper-Villarreal J, Mumby PJ, Saunders MI, Barry LA, Zawadzki A, Heijnis H, Morelli G, Lovelock CE. 2017. Vertical accretion and carbon burial rates in subtropical seagrass meadows increased following anthropogenic pressure from European colonisation. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 5, 474 ( 10.1016/j.ecss.2017.12.006) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Mazarrasa I, Marbà N, Garcia-Orellana J, Masqué P, Arias-Ortiz A, Duarte CM. 2017. Effect of environmental factors (wave exposure and depth) and anthropogenic pressure in the C sink capacity of Posidonia oceanica meadows. Limnol. Oceanogr. 62, 1436–1450. ( 10.1002/lno.10510) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Duffy JE, et al. 2015. Biodiversity mediates top–down control in eelgrass ecosystems: a global comparative-experimental approach. Ecol. Lett. 18, 696–705. ( 10.1111/ele.12448) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Phillips DL, Gregg JW. 2003. Source partitioning using stable isotopes: coping with too many sources. Oecologia 136, 261–269. ( 10.1007/s00442-003-1218-3) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Arndt S, Jørgensen BB, LaRowe DE, Middelburg J, Pancost R, Regnier P. 2013. Quantifying the degradation of organic matter in marine sediments: a review and synthesis. Earth Sci. Rev. 123, 53–86. ( 10.1016/j.earscirev.2013.02.008) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Aller RC. 1994. Bioturbation and remineralization of sedimentary organic matter: effects of redox oscillation. Chem. Geol. 114, 331–345. ( 10.1016/0009-2541(94)90062-0) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Jensen SI, Kühl M, Glud RN, Jørgensen LB, Priemé A. 2005. Oxic microzones and radial oxygen loss from roots of Zostera marina. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 293, 49–58. ( 10.3354/meps293049) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Krause-Jensen D, Markager S, Dalsgaard T. 2012. Benthic and pelagic primary production in different nutrient regimes. Estuar. Coasts 35, 527–545. ( 10.1007/s12237-011-9443-1) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Jankowska E, Michel LN, Zaborska A, Wlodarska-Kowalczuk M. 2016. Sediment carbon sink in low-density temperate eelgrass meadows (Baltic Sea). J. Geophys. Res. Biogeosci. 121, 2918–2934. ( 10.1002/2016jg003424) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Boström C, et al. 2014. Distribution, structure and function of Nordic eelgrass (Zostera marina) ecosystems: implications for coastal management and conservation. Aquat. Conserv. Mar. Freshw. Ecosyst. 24, 410–434. ( 10.1002/aqc.2424) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Macreadie PI, Allen K, Kelaher BP, Ralph PJ, Skilbeck CG. 2012. Paleoreconstruction of estuarine sediments reveal human-induced weakening of coastal carbon sinks. Glob. Change Biol. 18, 891–901. ( 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02582.x) [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Electronic Supplementary Material from Factors affecting blue carbon variability in eelgrass sediments implied from depth profiles
rsbl20180831supp1.pdf (606.9KB, pdf)
Raw Data
rsbl20180831supp2.xlsx (164.3KB, xlsx)

Data Availability Statement

Data are available as electronic supplementary material.


Articles from Biology Letters are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES