Skip to main content
Microbiology Resource Announcements logoLink to Microbiology Resource Announcements
. 2019 Jun 27;8(26):e00359-19. doi: 10.1128/MRA.00359-19

Draft Whole-Genome Sequences of 16 Campylobacter jejuni Isolates Obtained from Wild Birds

Lisa Carraro a, Francesca Marotta b, Anna Janowicz b, Claudio Patavino b, Alessandra Piccirillo a,
Editor: David A Baltrusc
PMCID: PMC6597683  PMID: 31248999

The draft genome sequences of 16 Campylobacter jejuni isolates obtained from wild birds are presented in this study. These genomes provide insights into the genetic features of C. jejuni isolates from wild birds, which are considered common hosts of this microorganism but have scarcely been investigated to date.

ABSTRACT

The draft genome sequences of 16 Campylobacter jejuni isolates obtained from wild birds are presented in this study. These genomes provide insights into the genetic features of C. jejuni isolates from wild birds, which are considered common hosts of this microorganism but have scarcely been investigated to date.

ANNOUNCEMENT

Campylobacter jejuni is a leading foodborne pathogen worldwide (1). In the European Union, Campylobacter spp. account for over 200,000 human campylobacteriosis cases annually (2). In addition to being an important human pathogen, C. jejuni is frequently isolated from domestic and wild mammals and birds (3). Wild birds are recognized as common carriers of Campylobacter spp. and may play a role in their zoonotic transmission (47). However, the extent of their contribution to Campylobacter epidemiology is still largely unknown. Molecular typing is a powerful tool for studying Campylobacter epidemiology. Given its ability to generate high-throughput data, whole-genome sequencing (WGS) provides in-depth knowledge about genetic diversity and host adaptation of Campylobacter spp. (8).

Here, we report the draft whole-genome sequences of 16 C. jejuni isolates obtained from cloacal swabs of healthy wild birds in northern Italy between 2011 and 2016 (Table 1). The isolation and identification of Campylobacter spp. was performed as previously described (9). Genomic DNA (gDNA) was extracted from pure cultures (obtained from single colonies) using the Invisorb Spin tissue minikit (Stratec Molecular GmbH, Birkenfeld, Germany), and gDNA libraries were prepared using the Nextera XT library prep kit (Illumina, Inc., San Diego, CA). gDNA libraries were then sequenced using a NextSeq 500 sequencer (Illumina), with a read length of 150-bp paired-end reads.

TABLE 1.

Genome characteristics and accession numbers of C. jejuni isolates obtained from wild birds

Isolate ID by ordera Yr of isolation Host
No. of raw reads % Q30 trimmed reads Genome coverage (×) N50 after scaffolding (bp) Estimated genome length (bp) G+C content (%) No. of contigs by RAST Largest contig size (bp) No. of CDSs by RAST No. of subsys tems by RAST MLST profile SRA accession no. GenBank accession no.
Common name Scientific name
Passeriformes
    US25 2011 Hooded crow Corvus cornix 6,052,226 97.78 219 117,102 1,861,257 30.1 179 408,206 2,077 199 9732b SRR9077768 RYYM00000000
    US54 2012 Hooded crow Corvus cornix 2,301,508 96.24 150 145,571 1,649,404 30.5 125 224,733 1,819 205 42 SRR9077776 RYYG00000000
    CH246 2015 Hooded crow Corvus cornix 1,203,250 96.35 79 157,739 1,617,704 30.4 44 304,071 1,720 199 4755 SRR9077765 RYYA00000000
    US18 2011 Common blackbird Turdus merula 2,136,040 97.85 82 61,187 1,912,650 30.1 451 183,560 2,505 203 9747b SRR9077770 RYYO00000000
    US55 2012 Common blackbird Turdus merula 5,886,446 96.47 337 152,666 1,588,157 30.4 36 315,873 1,633 200 2538 SRR9077763 RYYF00000000
    US50 2012 Western jackdaw Coloeus monedula 5,026,502 96.35 336 132,116 1,830,203 30.0 128 266,764 2,009 208 9746b SRR9077771 RYYJ00000000
    US51 2012 Western jackdaw Coloeus monedula 7,970,236 96.36 493 184,120 1,599,320 30.5 35 554,142 1,633 205 267 SRR9077772 RYYI00000000
    CH186 2015 Eurasian jay Garrulus glandarius 3,920,140 96.29 255 165,915 1,596,428 30.4 34 554,125 1,632 200 2538 SRR9077778 RYYB00000000
    US53 2012 Carrion crow Corvus corone 9,048,224 96.23 596 146,127 1,588,911 30.4 49 419,775 1,634 200 177 SRR9077775 RYYH00000000
    CH182 2015 Eurasian magpie Pica pica 5,201,042 96.13 356 211,630 1,654,792 30.5 50 390,030 1,728 209 45 SRR9077777 RYYD00000000
Strigiformes
    US12 2011 Little owl Athene noctua 1,028,246 97.46 37 152,970 1,703,137 30.3 52 226,920 1,805 203 45 SRR9077769 RYYP00000000
    US24 2011 Tawny owl Strix aluco 4,800,604 97.67 228 207,971 1,677,087 30.5 48 339,079 1,783 202 220 SRR9077767 RYYN00000000
Gruiformes
    US33 2011 Water rail Rallus aquaticus 3,650,720 96.22 245 180,616 1,923,707 30.7 62 232,159 2,017 199 NDc SRR9077773 RYYL00000000
Charadriiformes
    US42 2012 Yellow-legged gull Larus michahellis 1,474,096 96.12 100 221,533 1,631,410 30.5 29 419,087 1,670 202 2353 SRR9077774 RYYK00000000
Apodiformes
    CH165 2015 Common swift Apus apus 5,061,820 96.36 322 210,269 1,603,498 30.5 37 357,107 1,654 204 9478 SRR9077764 RYYE00000000
Columbiformes
    CH278 2016 Rock dove Columba livia 4,495,308 96.39 292 174,046 1,645,481 30.4 55 339,321 1,738 202 2209 SRR9077766 RYXZ00000000
a

ID, identifier.

b

New ST (the US18 isolate was also assigned to new alleles, tkt 773 and glnA 706).

c

ND, not determined.

Raw reads were de novo assembled using SPAdes 3.11.1 (settings, k-mer sizes 21, 33, 55, and 77 with mismatch careful mode) (10), and contigs of <200 bp were discarded using Geneious Prime 2019.0.4 (Biomatters ApS, Aarhus, Denmark). The QUAST software (11) was used to evaluate genome assembly quality. Annotation of the genomes was performed using the NCBI Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline (PGAP) (12) and the Rapid Annotations using Subsystems Technology (RAST) server (13). The genomes were also analyzed using MLST 2.0 to identify multilocus sequence typing (MLST) profiles (14). ResFinder 3.1 was used to identify resistance genes (15), and PlasmidFinder 2.0 was used to search for plasmids (16). BacWGSTdb (17) was also used to predict the presence of virulence and resistance genes. Default parameters were used for all software unless otherwise specified.

The 16 draft genomes were assembled into 29 to 451 contigs, with accumulated lengths ranging from 1.58 to 1.92 Mbp and an average G+C content of 30.4% (Table 1). The annotated genomes by RAST revealed 199 to 209 subsystems, 1,632 to 2,505 coding sequences (CDSs), and 42 to 45 RNAs. About half of the isolate genomes contained clustered regularly interspaced palindromic repeat (CRISPR) systems, but no plasmids were identified. MLST analysis assigned isolates to three novel sequence types (STs) and 12 STs previously identified in C. jejuni from humans, animals (including wild birds), and the environment (https://pubmlst.org/campylobacter/). Several genes associated with virulence (e.g., fliA, fliF, fliK, fliM, fliY, flgE, flgH, flgI, and rpoN genes for motility; cheA, cheV, cheW, and cheY genes for chemotaxis; cadF, jlpA, pebA, and flpA for adhesion; flhA, flhB, fliP, fliQ, fliR, flaC, ciaB, and ciaC for invasion; cdtA, cdtB, and cdtC for toxin production; pgl for glycosylation; and chuA for iron uptake) (18) were identified in most isolates that also carried genes, alone or in combination, encoding β-lactam (blaOXA-61, blaOXA-185, blaOXA-446, blaOXA-447, blaOXA-448, and blaOXA-449), tetracycline [tet(O)], and aminoglycoside [aph(3′)-III] resistance. The presence of virulence and resistance genes in C. jejuni isolates from wild birds are concerning and need to be further investigated.

The draft whole-genome sequences of the 16 C. jejuni isolates reported in this study are the first from wild birds in Italy. They will help in understanding the molecular epidemiology of C. jejuni in wild bird populations.

Data availability.

The draft whole-genome sequences and annotations are publicly available at the NCBI GenBank database under the accession numbers presented in Table 1. Raw reads can be found under the NCBI SRA BioProject number PRJNA510785.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank Rafaella Franch and Özlem Şahan Yapicier (University of Padua) and Lisa Di Marcantonio, Gabriella Di Serafino, and Diana Neri (Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale dell’Abruzzo e del Molise Giuseppe Caporale) for technical assistance. We thank the Campylobacter MLST database curators, Alison Cody and Frances Colles, for the number assignments of novel alleles and profiles.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Hansson I, Sandberg M, Habib I, Lowman R, Engvall EO. 2018. Knowledge gaps in control of Campylobacter for prevention of campylobacteriosis. Transbound Emerg Dis 65:30–48. doi: 10.1111/tbed.12870. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.European Food Safety Authority, European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. 2018. The European Union summary report on trends and sources of zoonoses, zoonotic agents and foodborne outbreaks in 2017. EFSA J 16:5500. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5500. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Kaakoush NO, Castaño-Rodríguez N, Mitchell HM, Man SM. 2015. Global epidemiology of Campylobacter infection. Clin Microbiol Rev 28:687–720. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00006-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.French NP, Midwinter A, Holland B, Collins-Emerson J, Pattison R, Colles F, Carter P. 2009. Molecular epidemiology of Campylobacter jejuni isolates from wild-bird fecal material in children’s playgrounds. Appl Environ Microbiol 75:779–783. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01979-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Sippy R, Sandoval-Green CM, Sahin O, Plummer P, Fairbanks WS, Zhang Q, Blanchong JA. 2012. Occurrence and molecular analysis of Campylobacter in wildlife on livestock farms. Vet Microbiol 157:369–375. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2011.12.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Cody AJ, McCarthy ND, Bray JE, Wimalarathna HM, Colles FM, Jansen van Rensburg MJ, Dingle KE, Waldenström J, Maiden MC. 2015. Wild bird-associated Campylobacter jejuni isolates are a consistent source of human disease, in Oxfordshire, United Kingdom. Environ Microbiol Rep 7:782–788. doi: 10.1111/1758-2229.12314. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Wei B, Kang M, Jang HK. 2019. Genetic characterization and epidemiological implications of Campylobacter isolates from wild birds in South Korea. Transbound Emerg Dis 66:56–65. doi: 10.1111/tbed.12931. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Llarena AK, Taboada E, Rossi M. 2017. Whole-genome sequencing in epidemiology of Campylobacter jejuni infections. J Clin Microbiol 55:1269–1275. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00017-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Giacomelli M, Andrighetto C, Lombardi A, Martini M, Piccirillo A. 2012. A longitudinal study on thermophilic Campylobacter spp. in commercial turkey flocks in northern Italy: occurrence and genetic diversity. Avian Dis 56:693–700. doi: 10.1637/10141-032312-Reg.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Nurk S, Bankevich A, Antipov D, Gurevich AA, Korobeynikov A, Lapidus A, Prjibelski AD, Pyshkin A, Sirotkin A, Sirotkin Y, Stepanauskas R, Clingenpeel SR, Woyke T, McLean JS, Lasken R, Tesler G, Alekseyev MA, Pevzner PA. 2013. Assembling single-cell genomes and mini-metagenomes from chimeric MDA products. J Comput Biol 20:714–737. doi: 10.1089/cmb.2013.0084. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Gurevich A, Saveliev V, Vyahhi N, Tesler G. 2013. QUAST: quality assessment tool for genome assemblies. Bioinformatics 29:1072–1075. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt086. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Tatusova T, DiCuccio M, Badretdin A, Chetvernin V, Nawrocki EP, Zaslavsky L, Lomsadze A, Pruitt KD, Borodovsky M, Ostell J. 2016. NCBI Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline. Nucleic Acids Res 44:6614–6624. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw569. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Aziz RK, Bartels D, Best AA, DeJongh M, Disz T, Edwards RA, Formsma K, Gerdes S, Glass EM, Kubal M, Meyer F, Olsen GJ, Olson R, Osterman AL, Overbeek RA, McNeil LK, Paarmann D, Paczian T, Parrello B, Pusch GD, Reich C, Stevens R, Vassieva O, Vonstein V, Wilke A, Zagnitko O. 2008. The RAST server: Rapid Annotations using Subsystems Technology. BMC Genomics 9:75. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-9-75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Larsen MV, Cosentino S, Rasmussen S, Friis C, Hasman H, Marvig RL, Jelsbak L, Sicheritz-Pontén T, Ussery DW, Aarestrup FM, Lund O. 2012. Multilocus sequence typing of total genome sequenced bacteria. J Clin Microbiol 50:1355–1361. doi: 10.1128/JCM.06094-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Zankari E, Hasman H, Cosentino S, Vestergaard M, Rasmussen S, Lund O, Aarestrup FM, Larsen MV. 2012. Identification of acquired antimicrobial resistance genes. J Antimicrob Chemother 67:2640–2644. doi: 10.1093/jac/dks261. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Carattoli A, Zankari E, Garcia-Fernandez A, Voldby Larsen M, Lund O, Villa L, Aarestrup FM, Hasman H. 2014. In silico detection and typing of plasmids using PlasmidFinder and plasmid multilocus sequence typing. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 58:3895–3903. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02412-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Ruan Z, Feng Y. 2016. BacWGSTdb, a database for genotyping and source tracking bacterial pathogens. Nucleic Acids Res 44:D682–D687. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkv1004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Bolton DJ. 2015. Campylobacter virulence and survival factors. Food Microbiol 48:99–108. doi: 10.1016/j.fm.2014.11.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The draft whole-genome sequences and annotations are publicly available at the NCBI GenBank database under the accession numbers presented in Table 1. Raw reads can be found under the NCBI SRA BioProject number PRJNA510785.


Articles from Microbiology Resource Announcements are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES