The draft genome sequences of 16 Campylobacter jejuni isolates obtained from wild birds are presented in this study. These genomes provide insights into the genetic features of C. jejuni isolates from wild birds, which are considered common hosts of this microorganism but have scarcely been investigated to date.
ABSTRACT
The draft genome sequences of 16 Campylobacter jejuni isolates obtained from wild birds are presented in this study. These genomes provide insights into the genetic features of C. jejuni isolates from wild birds, which are considered common hosts of this microorganism but have scarcely been investigated to date.
ANNOUNCEMENT
Campylobacter jejuni is a leading foodborne pathogen worldwide (1). In the European Union, Campylobacter spp. account for over 200,000 human campylobacteriosis cases annually (2). In addition to being an important human pathogen, C. jejuni is frequently isolated from domestic and wild mammals and birds (3). Wild birds are recognized as common carriers of Campylobacter spp. and may play a role in their zoonotic transmission (4–7). However, the extent of their contribution to Campylobacter epidemiology is still largely unknown. Molecular typing is a powerful tool for studying Campylobacter epidemiology. Given its ability to generate high-throughput data, whole-genome sequencing (WGS) provides in-depth knowledge about genetic diversity and host adaptation of Campylobacter spp. (8).
Here, we report the draft whole-genome sequences of 16 C. jejuni isolates obtained from cloacal swabs of healthy wild birds in northern Italy between 2011 and 2016 (Table 1). The isolation and identification of Campylobacter spp. was performed as previously described (9). Genomic DNA (gDNA) was extracted from pure cultures (obtained from single colonies) using the Invisorb Spin tissue minikit (Stratec Molecular GmbH, Birkenfeld, Germany), and gDNA libraries were prepared using the Nextera XT library prep kit (Illumina, Inc., San Diego, CA). gDNA libraries were then sequenced using a NextSeq 500 sequencer (Illumina), with a read length of 150-bp paired-end reads.
TABLE 1.
Isolate ID by ordera | Yr of isolation | Host |
No. of raw reads | % Q30 trimmed reads | Genome coverage (×) | N50 after scaffolding (bp) | Estimated genome length (bp) | G+C content (%) | No. of contigs by RAST | Largest contig size (bp) | No. of CDSs by RAST | No. of subsys tems by RAST | MLST profile | SRA accession no. | GenBank accession no. | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Common name | Scientific name | |||||||||||||||
Passeriformes | ||||||||||||||||
US25 | 2011 | Hooded crow | Corvus cornix | 6,052,226 | 97.78 | 219 | 117,102 | 1,861,257 | 30.1 | 179 | 408,206 | 2,077 | 199 | 9732b | SRR9077768 | RYYM00000000 |
US54 | 2012 | Hooded crow | Corvus cornix | 2,301,508 | 96.24 | 150 | 145,571 | 1,649,404 | 30.5 | 125 | 224,733 | 1,819 | 205 | 42 | SRR9077776 | RYYG00000000 |
CH246 | 2015 | Hooded crow | Corvus cornix | 1,203,250 | 96.35 | 79 | 157,739 | 1,617,704 | 30.4 | 44 | 304,071 | 1,720 | 199 | 4755 | SRR9077765 | RYYA00000000 |
US18 | 2011 | Common blackbird | Turdus merula | 2,136,040 | 97.85 | 82 | 61,187 | 1,912,650 | 30.1 | 451 | 183,560 | 2,505 | 203 | 9747b | SRR9077770 | RYYO00000000 |
US55 | 2012 | Common blackbird | Turdus merula | 5,886,446 | 96.47 | 337 | 152,666 | 1,588,157 | 30.4 | 36 | 315,873 | 1,633 | 200 | 2538 | SRR9077763 | RYYF00000000 |
US50 | 2012 | Western jackdaw | Coloeus monedula | 5,026,502 | 96.35 | 336 | 132,116 | 1,830,203 | 30.0 | 128 | 266,764 | 2,009 | 208 | 9746b | SRR9077771 | RYYJ00000000 |
US51 | 2012 | Western jackdaw | Coloeus monedula | 7,970,236 | 96.36 | 493 | 184,120 | 1,599,320 | 30.5 | 35 | 554,142 | 1,633 | 205 | 267 | SRR9077772 | RYYI00000000 |
CH186 | 2015 | Eurasian jay | Garrulus glandarius | 3,920,140 | 96.29 | 255 | 165,915 | 1,596,428 | 30.4 | 34 | 554,125 | 1,632 | 200 | 2538 | SRR9077778 | RYYB00000000 |
US53 | 2012 | Carrion crow | Corvus corone | 9,048,224 | 96.23 | 596 | 146,127 | 1,588,911 | 30.4 | 49 | 419,775 | 1,634 | 200 | 177 | SRR9077775 | RYYH00000000 |
CH182 | 2015 | Eurasian magpie | Pica pica | 5,201,042 | 96.13 | 356 | 211,630 | 1,654,792 | 30.5 | 50 | 390,030 | 1,728 | 209 | 45 | SRR9077777 | RYYD00000000 |
Strigiformes | ||||||||||||||||
US12 | 2011 | Little owl | Athene noctua | 1,028,246 | 97.46 | 37 | 152,970 | 1,703,137 | 30.3 | 52 | 226,920 | 1,805 | 203 | 45 | SRR9077769 | RYYP00000000 |
US24 | 2011 | Tawny owl | Strix aluco | 4,800,604 | 97.67 | 228 | 207,971 | 1,677,087 | 30.5 | 48 | 339,079 | 1,783 | 202 | 220 | SRR9077767 | RYYN00000000 |
Gruiformes | ||||||||||||||||
US33 | 2011 | Water rail | Rallus aquaticus | 3,650,720 | 96.22 | 245 | 180,616 | 1,923,707 | 30.7 | 62 | 232,159 | 2,017 | 199 | NDc | SRR9077773 | RYYL00000000 |
Charadriiformes | ||||||||||||||||
US42 | 2012 | Yellow-legged gull | Larus michahellis | 1,474,096 | 96.12 | 100 | 221,533 | 1,631,410 | 30.5 | 29 | 419,087 | 1,670 | 202 | 2353 | SRR9077774 | RYYK00000000 |
Apodiformes | ||||||||||||||||
CH165 | 2015 | Common swift | Apus apus | 5,061,820 | 96.36 | 322 | 210,269 | 1,603,498 | 30.5 | 37 | 357,107 | 1,654 | 204 | 9478 | SRR9077764 | RYYE00000000 |
Columbiformes | ||||||||||||||||
CH278 | 2016 | Rock dove | Columba livia | 4,495,308 | 96.39 | 292 | 174,046 | 1,645,481 | 30.4 | 55 | 339,321 | 1,738 | 202 | 2209 | SRR9077766 | RYXZ00000000 |
ID, identifier.
New ST (the US18 isolate was also assigned to new alleles, tkt 773 and glnA 706).
ND, not determined.
Raw reads were de novo assembled using SPAdes 3.11.1 (settings, k-mer sizes 21, 33, 55, and 77 with mismatch careful mode) (10), and contigs of <200 bp were discarded using Geneious Prime 2019.0.4 (Biomatters ApS, Aarhus, Denmark). The QUAST software (11) was used to evaluate genome assembly quality. Annotation of the genomes was performed using the NCBI Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline (PGAP) (12) and the Rapid Annotations using Subsystems Technology (RAST) server (13). The genomes were also analyzed using MLST 2.0 to identify multilocus sequence typing (MLST) profiles (14). ResFinder 3.1 was used to identify resistance genes (15), and PlasmidFinder 2.0 was used to search for plasmids (16). BacWGSTdb (17) was also used to predict the presence of virulence and resistance genes. Default parameters were used for all software unless otherwise specified.
The 16 draft genomes were assembled into 29 to 451 contigs, with accumulated lengths ranging from 1.58 to 1.92 Mbp and an average G+C content of 30.4% (Table 1). The annotated genomes by RAST revealed 199 to 209 subsystems, 1,632 to 2,505 coding sequences (CDSs), and 42 to 45 RNAs. About half of the isolate genomes contained clustered regularly interspaced palindromic repeat (CRISPR) systems, but no plasmids were identified. MLST analysis assigned isolates to three novel sequence types (STs) and 12 STs previously identified in C. jejuni from humans, animals (including wild birds), and the environment (https://pubmlst.org/campylobacter/). Several genes associated with virulence (e.g., fliA, fliF, fliK, fliM, fliY, flgE, flgH, flgI, and rpoN genes for motility; cheA, cheV, cheW, and cheY genes for chemotaxis; cadF, jlpA, pebA, and flpA for adhesion; flhA, flhB, fliP, fliQ, fliR, flaC, ciaB, and ciaC for invasion; cdtA, cdtB, and cdtC for toxin production; pgl for glycosylation; and chuA for iron uptake) (18) were identified in most isolates that also carried genes, alone or in combination, encoding β-lactam (blaOXA-61, blaOXA-185, blaOXA-446, blaOXA-447, blaOXA-448, and blaOXA-449), tetracycline [tet(O)], and aminoglycoside [aph(3′)-III] resistance. The presence of virulence and resistance genes in C. jejuni isolates from wild birds are concerning and need to be further investigated.
The draft whole-genome sequences of the 16 C. jejuni isolates reported in this study are the first from wild birds in Italy. They will help in understanding the molecular epidemiology of C. jejuni in wild bird populations.
Data availability.
The draft whole-genome sequences and annotations are publicly available at the NCBI GenBank database under the accession numbers presented in Table 1. Raw reads can be found under the NCBI SRA BioProject number PRJNA510785.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank Rafaella Franch and Özlem Şahan Yapicier (University of Padua) and Lisa Di Marcantonio, Gabriella Di Serafino, and Diana Neri (Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale dell’Abruzzo e del Molise Giuseppe Caporale) for technical assistance. We thank the Campylobacter MLST database curators, Alison Cody and Frances Colles, for the number assignments of novel alleles and profiles.
REFERENCES
- 1.Hansson I, Sandberg M, Habib I, Lowman R, Engvall EO. 2018. Knowledge gaps in control of Campylobacter for prevention of campylobacteriosis. Transbound Emerg Dis 65:30–48. doi: 10.1111/tbed.12870. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.European Food Safety Authority, European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. 2018. The European Union summary report on trends and sources of zoonoses, zoonotic agents and foodborne outbreaks in 2017. EFSA J 16:5500. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5500. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Kaakoush NO, Castaño-Rodríguez N, Mitchell HM, Man SM. 2015. Global epidemiology of Campylobacter infection. Clin Microbiol Rev 28:687–720. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00006-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.French NP, Midwinter A, Holland B, Collins-Emerson J, Pattison R, Colles F, Carter P. 2009. Molecular epidemiology of Campylobacter jejuni isolates from wild-bird fecal material in children’s playgrounds. Appl Environ Microbiol 75:779–783. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01979-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Sippy R, Sandoval-Green CM, Sahin O, Plummer P, Fairbanks WS, Zhang Q, Blanchong JA. 2012. Occurrence and molecular analysis of Campylobacter in wildlife on livestock farms. Vet Microbiol 157:369–375. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2011.12.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Cody AJ, McCarthy ND, Bray JE, Wimalarathna HM, Colles FM, Jansen van Rensburg MJ, Dingle KE, Waldenström J, Maiden MC. 2015. Wild bird-associated Campylobacter jejuni isolates are a consistent source of human disease, in Oxfordshire, United Kingdom. Environ Microbiol Rep 7:782–788. doi: 10.1111/1758-2229.12314. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Wei B, Kang M, Jang HK. 2019. Genetic characterization and epidemiological implications of Campylobacter isolates from wild birds in South Korea. Transbound Emerg Dis 66:56–65. doi: 10.1111/tbed.12931. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Llarena AK, Taboada E, Rossi M. 2017. Whole-genome sequencing in epidemiology of Campylobacter jejuni infections. J Clin Microbiol 55:1269–1275. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00017-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Giacomelli M, Andrighetto C, Lombardi A, Martini M, Piccirillo A. 2012. A longitudinal study on thermophilic Campylobacter spp. in commercial turkey flocks in northern Italy: occurrence and genetic diversity. Avian Dis 56:693–700. doi: 10.1637/10141-032312-Reg.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Nurk S, Bankevich A, Antipov D, Gurevich AA, Korobeynikov A, Lapidus A, Prjibelski AD, Pyshkin A, Sirotkin A, Sirotkin Y, Stepanauskas R, Clingenpeel SR, Woyke T, McLean JS, Lasken R, Tesler G, Alekseyev MA, Pevzner PA. 2013. Assembling single-cell genomes and mini-metagenomes from chimeric MDA products. J Comput Biol 20:714–737. doi: 10.1089/cmb.2013.0084. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Gurevich A, Saveliev V, Vyahhi N, Tesler G. 2013. QUAST: quality assessment tool for genome assemblies. Bioinformatics 29:1072–1075. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt086. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Tatusova T, DiCuccio M, Badretdin A, Chetvernin V, Nawrocki EP, Zaslavsky L, Lomsadze A, Pruitt KD, Borodovsky M, Ostell J. 2016. NCBI Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline. Nucleic Acids Res 44:6614–6624. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw569. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Aziz RK, Bartels D, Best AA, DeJongh M, Disz T, Edwards RA, Formsma K, Gerdes S, Glass EM, Kubal M, Meyer F, Olsen GJ, Olson R, Osterman AL, Overbeek RA, McNeil LK, Paarmann D, Paczian T, Parrello B, Pusch GD, Reich C, Stevens R, Vassieva O, Vonstein V, Wilke A, Zagnitko O. 2008. The RAST server: Rapid Annotations using Subsystems Technology. BMC Genomics 9:75. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-9-75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Larsen MV, Cosentino S, Rasmussen S, Friis C, Hasman H, Marvig RL, Jelsbak L, Sicheritz-Pontén T, Ussery DW, Aarestrup FM, Lund O. 2012. Multilocus sequence typing of total genome sequenced bacteria. J Clin Microbiol 50:1355–1361. doi: 10.1128/JCM.06094-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Zankari E, Hasman H, Cosentino S, Vestergaard M, Rasmussen S, Lund O, Aarestrup FM, Larsen MV. 2012. Identification of acquired antimicrobial resistance genes. J Antimicrob Chemother 67:2640–2644. doi: 10.1093/jac/dks261. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Carattoli A, Zankari E, Garcia-Fernandez A, Voldby Larsen M, Lund O, Villa L, Aarestrup FM, Hasman H. 2014. In silico detection and typing of plasmids using PlasmidFinder and plasmid multilocus sequence typing. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 58:3895–3903. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02412-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Ruan Z, Feng Y. 2016. BacWGSTdb, a database for genotyping and source tracking bacterial pathogens. Nucleic Acids Res 44:D682–D687. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkv1004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Bolton DJ. 2015. Campylobacter virulence and survival factors. Food Microbiol 48:99–108. doi: 10.1016/j.fm.2014.11.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
The draft whole-genome sequences and annotations are publicly available at the NCBI GenBank database under the accession numbers presented in Table 1. Raw reads can be found under the NCBI SRA BioProject number PRJNA510785.