Skip to main content
Saudi Pharmaceutical Journal : SPJ logoLink to Saudi Pharmaceutical Journal : SPJ
. 2019 Apr 20;27(5):724–730. doi: 10.1016/j.jsps.2019.04.008

Phytochemical analysis and anti-diabetic, anti-inflammatory and antioxidant activities of Loranthus acaciae Zucc. Grown in Saudi Arabia

Omar M Noman a, Ramzi A Mothana a,, Adnan J Al-Rehaily a, Ali S Al qahtani a, Fahd A Nasr a, Jamal M Khaled b, Mohamed F Alajmi a, Mansour S Al-Said a
PMCID: PMC6598209  PMID: 31297028

Abstract

The Loranthus genus has been demonstrated to be used in the treatment of wide range of diseases e.g. diabetes, inflammations and cancers. Many species of Loranthus represent a major source of biologically active constituents. Therefore, our study was carried out to investigate the anti-diabetic, anti-inflammatory and antioxidant effects of Loranthus acaciae Zucc. (Loranthaceae) grown in Saudi Arabia. Moreover, our research concerned the guided-fractionation and isolation of possible active compounds from this species. The crude ethanolic extract and its n-hexane, chloroform and n-butanol fractions were investigated for antidiabetic activity utilizing two methods namely, in alloxan-induced diabetic rats and glucose tolerance test in normal rats. Additionally, the anti-inflammatory activity was studied by the carrageenan-induced rat paw oedema method while DPPH free radical scavenging and β-carotene bleaching assays were utilized to determine the antioxidant activity. Various chromatographic and spectroscopic techniques were utilized for the isolation and characterization of the active compounds. Our results exhibited that the crude extract and chloroform fraction has the greatest hypoglycemic and antidiabetic effects. The chloroform fraction and crude extract produced at a dose of 500 mg/kg a significant hypoglycemic effect in diabetic rats with 47.0 and 33.6% reduction in blood sugar levels and in normoglycemic rats 35.6 and 35.4% respectively. A potent anti-inflammatory effect (67.2% at 500 mg/kg) was detected for the chloroform fraction. In addition, the chloroform fraction exhibited a high antioxidative and DPPH-radical inhibitory activity (85.4 and 88.3% respectively). The phytochemical analysis of L. acaciae led to the isolation and characterization of four compounds namely, quercetin 3-O-β-D-glucopyranoside (compound 1), quercetin 3-O-β-(6-O-galloyl)-glucopyranoside (compound 2), (-) catechin (compound 3), and catechin 7-O-gallate (compound 4). Among these compounds quercetin 3-O-β-D- glucopyranoside, quercetin 3-O-β-(6-O-galloyl)-glucopyranoside and catechin 7-O-gallate, are isolated for the first time from this plant.

Keywords: Loranthus acaciae, Antidiabetic, Antiinflammatory, Antioxidant, Flavonoids

1. Introduction

Loranthus acaciae Zucc. is a species of Loranthaceae family. Loranthaceae is one of the mistletoe families which has about 75 genera and approximately 1000 species of parasitic flowering trees or shrubs (Calvin and Wilson, 2006). The genus Loranthus, represents the largest genus in this family with around 500 species. The distribution of Loranthaceae family is ranging from tropical rain forests and mangroves to arid shrublands regions. The plants run in size from little herbs to trees up to 10 m high; the little species are generally woody parasites on tree limbs, while the bigger species are root parasites. The flowers are normally bisexual, and the fruits are quite often one-seeded berries. The berries are eaten by birds, which spread the seeds by putting them on trees (Sheila, 1985; Shaw et al., 2004). In Saudi Arabia and Yemen, Loranthaceae include four genera namely, Phragmanthera, Oncocalyx, Tapinanthus and Plicosepalus. Six species of these genera are distributed in the South, North and West and of Saudi Arabia (Waly et al., 2012). Loranthus acaciae Zucc., (syn: Plicosepalus acaciae (Zucc.) Wiens & Polhill) is a perennial green semiparasitic mistletoe that directly attaches to another plants e.g. Acacia trees via a haustorium (Vaknin et al., 1996). Leaves are mostly alternate, solitary or in clusters, oblong or oblanceolate up to 4 cm long. Flowers are 2–3, in solitary or clustered, pedunculated umbels. The corolla is dark red and often warted below (Vaknin et al., 1996).

Centuries ago, plants of Loranthus have been utilized in Chinese folk medicine to treat several ailments, including hypertension, cancer, obesity, gastrointestinal tract damage and rheumatoid disorders (Wang et al., 2008). Furthermore, previous investigations on Loranthus plants have demonstrated to possess antioxidant anti-inflammatory and analgesic activities (Liu et al., 2015). In addition, some Loranthus species indicated further important pharmacological effects e.g. antimicrobial and potential antitumor activities (Sadik et al., 2003). It is additionally detailed that few species of the genera Plicosepalus and Phragmanthera were demonstrated to prevent fatty acid synthesis with consequent decrease of body weight in animal (Wang et al., 2008). Other prior studies on Loranthus plants additionally indicated diverse pharmacological activities, for example, antihepatotoxic [9] (Yang et al., 1987), anti-diabetic (Osadebe et al., 2004), antiviral (Lohézic-Le Dévéhat et al., 2002), antimicrobial (Daud et al., 2005) and cytotoxic activities (Kim et al., 2004). Al-Taweel et al., (2012) studied the hypoglycemic effect of Plicosepalus curviflorus and demonstrated that the alcoholic extract of the leaves of P. curviflorus possessed an interesting hypoglycemic effect. In addition, Mothana et al., (2012) explored the anti-inflammatory and antioxidative effects of Loranthus regularis and demonstrated that the ethyl acetate fraction of L. regularis has a great activities (Vaknin et al., 1996).

The information detailed in previously mentioned investigations justifies the conventional utilization of L. regularis and P. curviflorus in treating of diabetes and inflammations in Saudi Arabia and Yemen (Mossa, 1985, Elshanawani, 1996, Al-Fatimi et al., 2007). L. acaciae is quite spread in Saudi Arabia however, the current information about this species is restricted. Based on these data, our work aimed to examine the anti-inflammatory, antidiabetic, and antioxidative activities of L. acaciae grown in Saudi Arabia and to isolate the major active compounds.

2. Experimental

2.1. Plant collection and authentication

The collection of L. acaciae leaves and stems grown on Acacia trees was done during March 2012 from the South of Saudi Arabia. The plant was authenticated by Dr. Mohammed Yusuf at department of Pharmacognosy, College of Pharmacy, King Saud University. Voucher specimen (15809) was deposited in the herbarium of Pharmacognosy Department, College of pharmacy, KSU, Riyadh, SA.

2.2. Preparation of the extracts and fractions

The oven-dried and grinded aerial part (1.5 kg) was extracted with 3000 ml ethanol (CH3CH2OH) for 4 h utilizing a Soxhlet apparatus. The obtained ethanolic extract was filtered and concentrated under reduced pressure to yield a 4.1% (w/w) (61 g) of the crude alcoholic extract. 50 g of the extract was then suspended in distilled water and successively partitioned with n-hexane, chloroform (CHCl3) and n-butanol (BtOH) to give 6.5 g of hexane-, 11.0 g of chloroform- and 20.5 g of butanol-fractions.

2.3. Compound isolation and identification

Chloroform fraction (2 g) was separated using silica gel by column chromatography (72 g, 80 × 3 cm). Elution started with 3% methanol: chloroform and polarity was increased with methanol. The collected fractions (20 ml each) were pooled depending on their TLC behavior to give 11 fractions. Fraction E (97 mg), eluted with 5% methanol: chloroform was rechromatographed on a reversed-phase column (50 g, 60 × 1 cm). The column was eluted gradually starting from 40% water: methanol. The collected fractions were merged into 10 sub-fractions according to their TLC. Sub-fraction 4, eluted with 30% water: methanol afford compounds 1 (7 mg) and 2 (5 mg). Furthermore, fraction I (78.4 mg), eluted with 10% methanol: chloroform, was rechromatographed on a sephadex column (10 g, 60 × 1 cm). The eluting was gradually starting from 20% methanol. The collected fractions were merged into 15 sub-fractions according to their TLC. Sub-fraction 5 afforded compounds 3 (13 mg) and 4 (9 mg). Structure elucidation was performed using Spectroscopic techniques. The UV and IR experiments were performed on Hitachi-UV-3200 and JASCO 320-A spectrometers. The 1D and 2D-NMR analysis was carried out on a Bruker AMX-500 spectrometer with tetramethylsilane (TMS) as internal standard. For mass analysis, Jeol JMS-700 High Resolution Mass Spectrophotometer was utilized.

Compound 1 (quercetin 3-O-β-D-glucopyranoside) (see Fig. 1): yellow amorphous powder; C21H20O12; MP: 239–241 °C; UV λmax (MeOH): 257, 272, 360 nm; IR νmax (KBr): 3452, 1661, 1620, 1580, 1520, 1074, 1025, 1008 cm−1; NMR data are demonstrated in Table 4 and similar to the data in the literature (Harborne and Mabry, 1982, Şöhretoğlu et al., 2009).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Isolated compounds from L. acacia.

Table 4.

1H and 13C NMR data for compounds 1, 2 and 4 in CD3OD.

Position Compound 1 Compound 2 Compound 4
δH (J in Hz) δc ppm δH (J in Hz) δc ppm δH (J in Hz) δc ppm
2 158.84 161.4 4.63 (d, J = 7.5) 81.09
3 135.46 133.8 3.28 (m) 68.48
4 179.48 179.9 2.91 (dd, J = 14,7), 2.58 (dd, J = 14,7) 28.64
5 162.92 161.48 156.31
6 6.16 (s) 99.79 6.15 (d, J = 2) 98.5 7.20 (d, J = 2.1) 102.13
7 166.07 164.59 151.89
8 6.35 s 94.60 6.31 (d, J = 2) 93.4 6.18 (t, J = 2.1) 101.95
9 158.35 157.9 157.73
10 105.51 104.2 107.13
1′ 122.93 121.6 131.99
2′ 7.76 s 117.39 7.52 (d, J = 2) 115.7 7.19 (d, J = 1.8) 115.24
3′ 145.79 144.8 146.45
4′ 149.73 148.3 146.40
5′ 6.82 (d, J = 8.1) 115.86 6.69 (d, J = 8) 114.5 6.85 (d, J = 7.8) 116.23
6′ 7.55 (t, J = 2) 123.06 7.53 (d, J = 2,8) 122.3 6.86 (dd, J = 7.8, 1.8) 120.06
1″ 5.22 (d, J = 7) 104.13 5.19 (d, J = 7.5) 102.8 120.80
2″ 3.55 (t, J = 7) 75.59 3.93 m 74.2 110.60
3″ 3.35* 77.98 3.48* 76.2 146.78
4″ 3.45* 71.06 3.43* 70.8 140.57
5″ 3.20 (m) 78.27 3.50 (m) 74.4 146.78
6″ 3.68 (dd, J = 2, 11.6), 3.56 (dd, J = 5.2, 11.6) 62.39 3.73 (dd, J = 2, 11.6), 3.56 (dd, J = 5.2, 11.6) 62.8 110.60
1‴ 119.8
2‴ 6.69 s 108.7
3‴ 144.8
4‴ 138.3
5‴ 144.8
6‴ 6.69 s 108.7
7‴ 166.76 167.16
*

Signal patterns unclear.

Compound 2 (quercetin 3-O-β-(6-O-galloyl)-glucopyranoside) (see Fig. 1): yellow powder; C28H24 O16; MP: 192–195 °C; UV λmax (MeOH): 256, 350 nm; IR νmax (KBr): 3366, 1705, 1660, 1616, 1572, 1510, 1454, 1370, 1280 cm−1; NMR data are demonstrated in Table 4 and comparable with those reported in the literature (Şöhretoğlu et al., 2009).

Compound 3 (catechin) (see Fig. 1): yellowish white crystalline solid; C15H14O6; MP: 174–176 °C; UV λmax (MeOH): 275 nm; IR νmax (KBr): 3402, 2852, 1625, 1470, 1276, 1016 cm−1; NMR data are demonstrated in Table 4 and similar to data in the literature (Shen et al., 1993, Davis et al., 1996; Afsar et al., 2018).

Compound 4 (Catechin 7-O-gallate) (see Fig. 1): yellowish white crystalline solid; C22H18O10; MP: 164–166 °C; UV λmax (MeOH): 218, 270 nm; IR νmax (KBr): 3452, 3002, 2858, 1718, 1621, 1572, 1518, 1451, 1070, 1026 cm−1; NMR data are demonstrated in Table 4 and comparable with data in the literature (Tanaka et al., 1983; Tayyaba et al., 2018).

2.4. Experimental animals

Male Wister rats weighing 150–180 g were obtained from the Experimental Animal Care Center, College of Pharmacy, King Saud University and used for this investigation. The animals were housed under standard controlled conditions (24 °C and a 12 h light/dark cycle). The rats were provided with standard pellet diet and tap water. The investigation was assured by Research Ethics Committee (CBR 4537) of College of Pharmacy, King Saud University.

2.5. Acute toxicity study

The acute Toxicity experiment was carried out according to the test guideline of Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD guideline 423 for testing of chemicals) (OECD, 2001). Twenty rats were used for the acute toxicity study (five for each group). Different doses of the extract (0.5, 1, 2, and 5 g/kg) were suspended in 0.5% aqueous Tween 80 and administered orally. The animals were continuously observed for signs of toxicity e.g. autonomic, central nervous system, somatomotor and behavioral changes (tremors, convulsions, salivation, diarrhea, lethargy, sleep, etc..) for 12 h and the mortality was observed for 24 h.

2.6. Determination of the anti-inflammatory activity

The assessment of the anti-inflammatory effect was carried out by utilizing the carrageenan-induced rat paw oedema method. Thirty rats were divided into six equal groups (n = 5). Group 1 received vehicle control 0.9% NaCl (5 mg/kg). Groups 2–5 received as previously used (Mothana et al., 2012) a dose of 500 mg/kg crude extract, n-hexane, chloroform, and n-butanol fractions. Rats in group 6 were given indomethacin (10 mg/kg). The samples (extracts and drug) were administered 30 min prior to injection of 0.1 ml of 1% freshly prepared suspension of carrageenan in normal saline in the right hind paw sub planar of each rat. The oedematous paw volume was measured initially and at every 1 h intervals for 4 h by using plethysmometer (Winter and Porter, 1957).

2.7. Determination of hypoglycemic and anti-diabetic activity

2.7.1. Hypoglycemic test in normal rats

The normal animals were divided into seven equal groups (n = 5). All rats were overnight fasted before starting the assay. Group 1 received normal saline. Group 2 was treated with 1 ml tween 80. Groups 3–6 were orally given 500 mg/kg of crude extract, n-hexane, chloroform, and n-butanol fractions. Animals in group 7 were treated with 10 mg/kg of glibenclamide as a positive control (Pareek et al., 2009). At the end, the blood samples were taken from tail vein just prior to drug administration and at every 30 min intervals for 2 h. The glucose level in serum was controlled immediately utilizing glucose estimation kit Refretron (Roche, Germany) to monitor the hypoglycemic effect of the investigated extract and fractions comparative to negative and positive control groups.

2.7.2. Alloxan induced diabetic rats

Diabetes was induced in the overnight fasted rats by intraperitoneally injection of 150 mg/kg of alloxan in distilled water. Rats were tested for diabetes after one week and those with blood glucose ranging 300–400 mg/dl were chosen for the experimentation. The investigation was carried out as described by EL Tahir et al. (2007). The diabetic animals were divided into seven equal groups (n = 5). Group 1 was treated with normal saline and group 2 received tween 80 (vehicle). Groups 3–6 were orally treated with a dose of 500 mg/kg of crude extract, n-hexane, chloroform, and n-butanol fractions. Group 7 was considered as a positive control and treated orally with 10 mg/kg of glibenclamide. The samples (extract/fractions and drug) were administered to the animals following 24 h of fasting. The measurement of glucose blood level was performed before giving the samples (0 h) and 2 h after.

2.8. Determination of the antioxidant activity

2.8.1. Scavenging activity of DPPH radical

For the determination of the free radical scavenging, DPPH (2, 2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl) was utilized. The assay was completed as depicted by Brand et al. (1995). This test estimates the free radical scavenging ability of the examined extract and fractions. Various concentrations (10, 50, 100, 500 and 1000 μg/ml) of the extract and fractions were used. Briefly, to obtain a total volume of 1 ml of the test mixture, 500 μl of the extract or fraction was mixed with 375 μl methanol and added 125 μl of 0.04% DPPH ethanolic solution. Ascorbic acid was utilized as positive control. After 30 min of incubation at room temperature in the dark, the reduction in absorbance was estimated at λ = 517 nm. The radical scavenging ability was determined from the equation:

%ofradicalscavengingactivity=(Abscontrol-Abssample/Abscontrol)×100

2.8.2. β-Carotene–linoleic acid assay

The antioxidant activity of the extracts was assessed utilizing the β-carotene bleaching assay reported by Velioglu et al. (1998) with modifications. To flasks containing 0.02 ml of linoleic acid and 0.2 ml of Tween-20, 1 ml of a β-carotene solution (0.2 mg/ml in chloroform) was added. The chloroform was evaporated under reduced pressure at 40 °C. Then residue solution was directly diluted with 100 ml of distilled water and blended for 1–2 min to make an emulsion. A solution prepared likewise but without β-carotene was utilized as a blank. A control containing 0.2 ml of 80% (v/v) methanol instead of extract was additionally made. A 5 ml of the emulsion was given to a tube containing 0.2 ml of the sample extract at 1 mg/ml. Rutin (1 mg/ml) was utilized as a positive control. After that an incubation of the tubes in a water bath at 40 °C for 2 h was carried out. At the end, the Absorbance for test and standard solutions was measured against the blank at 470 nm at 30 min intervals, with a UV–visible spectrophotometer (UV mini-1240, Shimadzu, Japan). The antioxidant activity was determined utilizing the formula:

%ofantioxidantactivity=Abs0-Abst/(Abs0°-Abst°)×100

where Abs0 and Abs0° are the absorbance readings at zero time of incubation for samples and control, respectively. Abst and Abst° are the absorbance readings for samples and control, respectively, after incubation for 120 min.

2.9. Statistical analysis

Statistical differences between control and treatment values of two parameters were analyzed with student’s t-test using excel Microsoft office. Data were expressed as mean ± S.D. and the difference were statistically significant at P < 0.05 compared to control. All statistical charts were conducted using origin Lab software (version 8, Massachusetts, USA) and excel Microsoft office.

3. Results and discussion

Throughout our screening for interesting pharmacological activities for local medicinal plants, the anti-inflammatory, anti-diabetic and antioxidant activities of the ethanolic extract of Loranthus acaciae and its fractions were investigated.

3.1. Acute toxicity

The treated rats did not show any symptoms of toxic reactions or behavioral changes during the 24 h period of investigation. No mortality was found up to the highest dose of 5000 mg/Kg after the completion of 24 h. The LD50 of the extract and its fractions were considered more than 5 g/kg body weight orally.

3.2. Anti-inflammatory activity

The results of the acute anti-inflammatory effect of the crude extract of L. acaciae and its fractions on carrageenan-induced oedema in hind paws of rats are demonstrated in Table 1. Carrageenan-induced paw oedema remained even 3 h after its injection into the subplantar region of rat paw. It was observed that the crude extract and the chloroform fraction at the dose of 500 mg/kg induced significantly inhibition effect on the oedema formation by 57.5 and 67.2% respectively. Our obtained data revealed that the chloroform fraction possessed efficient anti-inflammatory activity in the acute model of inflammation in comparison to the indomethacin (76.9%). Carrageenan-induced hind paw oedema has been generally utilized as an experimental model of acute inflammation. The development of oedema induced by carrageenan is a biphasic event: the early stage (1 h) is due to the liberation of serotonin, histamine and kinins. The later stage (over 1 h) is related with the activation of kinin-like substances and the liberation of prostaglandins, proteases and cyclooxygenase products (Vinegar et al., 1969). The crude extract and chloroform fraction of L. acaciae displayed a moderate inhibitory impact at early stage however could adequately suppress the expansion in paw volume during the late stage (3 h after carrageenan injection) of inflammation. In light of this perception, it might be proposed that this pharmacological action most likely may be ascribed to the inhibition of the liberation of pro-inflammatory mediators of acute inflammation, especially the prostaglandins. Of note, the effectiveness and power of the chloroform fraction was superior to others and almost comparable with those of indomethacin. Consequently, the chloroform fraction was picked for additional refining. The interesting anti-inflammatory activity of the extract and fractions of L. acaciae is in concurrence with the results revealed by Mothana et al. (2012) on L. regularis. It was uncovered that the ethyl acetate fraction at the dose of 500 mg/kg showed the best anti-inflammatory effect comparable to the positive control where it inhibited the oedema development by 67% (Mothana et al., 2012).

Table 1.

Anti-inflammatory activity of the extract and fractions of L. acaciae.

Treatment (n = 5) Dose mg/kg Paw volume (Mean ± S.E)
Before Carrageenan After 3 h Net Increase after 3 h % Inhibition
Carrageenan 0.05 ml 0.96 ± 0.02 2.09 ± 0.02 1.13 ± 0.004
Crude extract + Carrageenan 500 0.97 ± 0.03 1.46 ± 0.02 0.48 ± 0.03** 57.52
Hexane Fr. + Carrageenan 500 0.91 ± 0.03 1.82 ± 0.05 0.91 ± 0.05* 19.02
Chloroform Fr. + Carrageenan 500 0.97 ± 0.03 1.34 ± 0.02 0.37 ± 0.01** 67.25
Butanol Fr. + Carrageenan 500 0.91 ± 0.03 1.82 ± 0.05 0.89 ± 0.07* 20.64
Indomethacin + Carrageenan 100 0.99 ± 0.04 1.25 ± 0.03 0.26 ± 0.02** 76.99
*

P < 0.01.

**

P < 0.001 student's t-test, n = 5.

3.3. Hypoglycemic and anti-diabetic activity

The results of the effect of oral administration of extract and fractions of the L. acaciae on normal and diabetic rats are incorporated in Table 2. Our results exhibited that the crude extract and chloroform fraction has the greatest hypoglycemic and antidiabetic effects (Table 2). In the normoglycemic rats, the chloroform fraction gave a percentage reduction in blood sugar levels of 35.6% at 2 h after administration. Moreover, chloroform fraction produced a pronounced antidiabetic effect in alloxan-induced rats, giving a percentage reduction in blood sugar level of 47.0% at 500 mg/kg 2 h after administration. This effect was statistically significant and in comparison to the positive control glibenclamide (54.7%).

Table 2.

Hypoglycemic study of extract and fractions of L. acaciae on normal and diabetic rats.

Treatment Dose mg/kg Orally Glucose Levels in normal rats (mg/dl)
% Inhibition Glucose Levels in diabetic rats (mg/dl)
% Inhibition
Before Treatments 2 h after Treatments Before Treatments 2 h after Treatments
Normal saline 112.00 ± 2.54 107.25 ± 1.84 301.75 ± 6.57 304.25 ± 5.79
Vehicle(Tween-80) 110.65 ± 4.85 105.75 ± 2.28 326.25 ± 4.80 314.50 ± 10.38
Crude extract 500 109.75 ± 0.85 70.45 ± 3.61c 35.40 320.00 ± 7.73 212.25 ± 10.60c 33.67
n-hexane extract 500 108.50 ± 1.70 98.02 ± 2.98a 9.654 296.00 ± 4.10 306.25 ± 7.05 3.46
Chloroform extract 500 108.50 ± 7.05 69.85 ± 0.93c 35.62 323.50 ± 4.05 171.25 ± 4.13c 47.06
n-butanol extract 500 109.25 ± 1.93 90.32 ± 4.40b 17.32 329.50 ± 4.83 298.25 ± 5.32c 12.15
Glibenclamide 10 112.25 ± 3.09 60.87 ± 3.15c 45.76 339.25 ± 22.2 153.50 ± 4.17c 54.75

Data are mean of 5 male in each group ± SD.

a

P < 0.05.

b

P < 0.01.

c

P < 0.001 student's t-test.

These results further substantiated the claim and use of L. acaciae in folklore medicine in Saudi Arabia as anti-diabetic drug (Waly et al., 2012). The observed hypoglycemic activity of L. acaciae is in agreement with a previously reported data on another Loranthus species, namely P. curviflorus (L. curviflorus) which showed significant hypoglycemic activity (Al-Taweel et al., 2012).

3.4. Antioxidant activity

In our investigation, the conceivable antioxidant effects of the L. acaciae were assessed utilizing two techniques, that are 2, 2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl- (DPPH) and β-Carotene-linoleic acid techniques. In the DPPH radical scavenging assay, a strong anti-radical activity was displayed by the chloroform extract starting from 50 to 1000 μg/ml (67.2–88.3%) and by the positive control (ascorbic acid) (90.7% at 1000 μg/ml) whereas only a low free radical inhibitory activity of DPPH (40.6%) was observed for the n-hexane extract at the highest concentration 1000 μg/ml (Table 3). Table 3 exhibited also a moderate DPPH-radical inhibitory activity the for the n-butanol fraction (78.4%) at a concentration of 1000 μg/ml. In the β-carotene-linoleic acid assay, a strong inhibition of the discoloration of β-carotene (85.4%) was noticed with the chloroform extract at a concentration of 1000 μg/mL (Table 3). This antioxidant effect was in comparison with that of the positive control rutin (89.3%). The n-hexane extract exhibited the lowest total antioxidant activity with a value of 57.2%.

Table 3.

DPPH scavenging and antioxidant activities of L. acacia.

Sample *Total antioxidant activity in (%) Radical Scavenging Activity in (%) (DPPH-radical scavenging assay)
1000 (µg/ml) 10 50 100 (µg/ml) 500 1000
n-Hexane fraction 57.2 ± 2.8 6.21 ± 4.2 10.2 ± 3.1 19.3 ± 2.4 24.3 ± 4.6 40.6 ± 3.7
Chloroform fraction 85.4 ± 5.3 48.2 ± 2.6 67.2 ± 2.9 80.4 ± 4.9 84.3 ± 2.7 88.3 ± 2.5
n-Butanol fraction 79.8 ± 3.4 33.7 ± 5.1 50.3 ± 4.1 70.3 ± 3.9 76.3 ± 4.1 78.4 ± 3.2
Ascorbic acid NT 80.7 ± 2.5 85.1 ± 1.3 85 ± 3.2 88.7 ± 2.7 90.7 ± 4.4
Rutin 89.3 NT NT NT NT NT
*

β-carotene bleaching assay, NT not tested. In the columns, means ± SD.

The antioxidant ability of the crude extract and fractions of L. acaciae in this investigation is in agreement with recent report that has shown a potential radical inhibitory activity for Plicosepalus curviflorus (Loranthaceae) growing in Saudi Arabia (Badr et al., 2016).

Generally, reactive oxygen species (ROS) e.g. hydroxyl radical, hydrogen peroxide and superoxide anion radical take part in normal cell function as well as in pathological disorders, like inflammation. Various investigations have revealed a participation of ROS in models of inflammation, e.g. carrageenan-induced pleurisy in rats (Halliwell and Gutteridge, 2015). It has been observed that the production of reactive species occurs at the site of inflammation and contributes to tissue damage (Conner and Grisham, 1996). It is almost thought that the antioxidant activity of plant phenolics (e.g., flavonoids, phenolic acids and tannins,) resides mainly in their ability to donate hydrogen atoms or electrons and thereby scavenge free radicals (Sharififar et al., 2009). The results of the β-carotene/linoleic acid assay corresponded to the free radical-scavenging activity of tested L. acaciae. The extract and fractions especially the chloroform fraction exhibited great antioxidant activity. In view of the known support of ROS in inflammation pathways (Conner and Grisham, 1996) we expect that the two effects are presumably related.

3.5. Isolated compounds from L. acaciae

The 1H NMR spectrum of compound 1 displayed three aromatic proton signals at 7.76 (d, J = 2 Hz, H-2′), 6.82 (d, J = 8.4 Hz,H-5′) and 7.55 (dd, J = 2, 8.4 Hz) in the form of an ABC spin-system proposing a flavonol structure with 3′,4′-disubstituted B-ring, and a pair of meta coupling proton signals at 6.16 (d, J = 2 Hz, H-6) and 6.35 (d, J = 2 Hz, H-8) for the A ring. It also displayed signals for glucose moiety with anomeric proton resonated at 5.23 (d, J = 7.6, H-1″) confirming a β-linkage of the glucose. The 13C NMR spectrum confirmed this hypothesis and exhibited 21 signals involving carbonyl signal resonated at 179.48 (C-4). It showed aromatic carbons at δ 135.46 (C-3), 162.92 (C-5), 166.07 (C-7), 145.79 (C-3′), 149.73 (C-4′) confirming a 3,5,7,3′,4′-oxygenated flavone nucleus. The 13C NMR spectrum displayed also signals at 104.13 (C-1″), 75.59 (C-2″), 77.98 (C-3″), 71.06 (C-4″), 78.27 (C-5″), 62.39 (C-6″) assigned for glucose molecule (Table 4). Based on these spectral data and comparison with reported literature (Harborne and Mabry, 1982, Şöhretoğlu et al., 2009), the compound was identified as quercetin 3-O-β-D-glucopyranoside. This constituent is isolated for the first time from the species L. acaciae. However, it was formerly found in other plants, including L. regularis (Mothana et al., 2012). Quercetin 3-O-β-D-glucopyranoside was reported to exhibit antibacterial and antiinflammatory effect (Islam et al., 2012).

1H and 13C NMR spectral data of compound 2 displayed signals assigned to aromatic system and sugar moieties (Table 4). The 1H NMR spectrum displayed 3 aromatic protons at δH 7.59 (dd, J = 2.0, 8.0, H-2), 7.56 (d, J = 2.0), and 6.74 (d, J = 8.0), indicating the presence of O-disubstituted B ring. In addition, 2 meta coupled signals in the aromatic field at δH 6.20 (1H, d, J = 2.0, H-6) and 6.36 (1H, d, J = 2.0, H-8) were compatible with a 5,7-dihydroxy substituted A ring of flavonoid. A singlet at δH 6.96 (2H) was assigned to the H-2‴ and H-6‴ of gallic acid. The configuration of the anomeric proton of sugar moiety was proposed to be β according to the coupling constant (7.2 Hz). The sugar was designated to be a β-glucopyranose according to 1H NMR data. In the 13C NMR spectrum 28 carbon signals were shown. Fifteen carbon signals were assigned to quercetin moiety, 6 carbon signals were assigned to the glucose unit, and the remaining 7 carbon signals were assigned to gallic acid moiety. Additionally, the HMBC spectrum enabled us to establish the locations to be connected among the quercetin, glucopyranose, and gallic acid moieties based on the cross peaks: one due to the coupling between H-1″ and C-3 and the other due to the coupling between Ha-6″ and C-7‴. After the complete interpretation of the NMR data on the basis of the COSY, HSQC, and HMBC experiments, and comparing these data with published data, compound 2 was identified as quercetin 3-O-β-(6-O-galloyl)-glucopyranoside. This constituent is isolated for the first time from the species L. acaciae. Quercetin 3-O-β-(6-O-galloyl)-glucopyranoside has been found to show antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, lipid peroxidation inhibitory effects. The strong inhibitor efficiency was noted to be greater than those of non-galloylated flavonol glycosides (Şöhretoğlu et al., 2009).

The 1H NMR spectrum of compound 4 (Table 4) displayed signals at 7.20 (s, galloyl), 7.19 (d, J = 1.8 Hz, H-2′), 6.85 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, H-5′), 6.84 (dd, J = 7.8 Hz, and J = 1.8 Hz, H-6′), 6.70 (d, J = 2.1 Hz, H-6), 6.19 (d, J = 2.1 Hz, H-8), 4.63 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, H-2), 3.28 (m, H-3), 2.70 (dd, J = 14 Hz and J = 7 Hz, H-4). The 13C NMR spectrum showed the presence of 22 carbons resonated for a flavanol residue with gallic acid. The interpretation of correlations in the COSY, HSQC, and HMBC experiments and the comparison with data reported previously (Tanaka et al., 1983; Afsar et al., 2018), compound 4 was concluded to be catechin 7-O-gallate. This constituent is isolated for the first time from the species L. acaciae.

Polyphenolic compounds particularly flavonoids have pulled a lot of attention in relevancy their wide range of pharmacological activities within the bar of various conditions and diseases including oxidative stress, hyperglycemia, inflammations, cancers and cardiovascular disorders (Garcia-Mediavilla et al., 2007). In fact, flavonoids demonstrating powerful antioxidant activity have been suggested to be useful in the management of diabetes mellitus and inflammations. Additionally, many reports have proposed that this type of natural products might act as inhibitors on biological targets mostly enzymes like α-glycosidase, α-amylase and Dipeptidyl Peptidase IV (DPP-4) that are involved in type 2 diabetes as well as enzymes involved in inflammation such as nitric oxide synthase (iNOS), cyclooxygenase (COX-2) and lipoxygenase (Fan et al., 2013, Li et al., 2009, Morales et al., 2006, Peng et al., 2016, Sarian et al., 2017, Tadera et al., 2006, Tunon et al., 2009). Consequently, all these mechanisms might partly give an explanation for the anti-inflammatory, antidiabetic and antioxidant effects of L. acaciae extract and the isolated flavonoid-compounds.

4. Conclusion

In conclusion, our results plainly uncovered that L. acaciae extracts particularly the chloroform extract possessed potent anti-inflammatory, antidiabetic and antioxidant effects which underlines its traditional use for various ailments including inflammations and diabetes. Additionally, the phytochemical investigation of the active chloroform fraction led to the isolation and characterization of four compounds namely, quercetin 3-O-β-D-glucopyranoside, quercetin 3-O-β-(6-O-galloyl)-glucopyranoside, (-) catechin, and catechin 7-O-gallate. Among these compounds, quercetin 3-O-β-D-glucopyranoside, quercetin 3-O-β-(6-O-galloyl)-glucopyranoside and catechin 7-O-gallate are reported for the first time from L. acaciae. More examinations are required to affirm these activities and to clarify the mechanism of action. Besides, further investigations on the isolation and characterization of active entities ought to be proceeded.

Acknowledgments

Acknowledgment

The authors extend their appreciation to the Deanship of Scientific Research at King Saud University, Saudi Arabia for funding the work through the research group project no. (RGP-073).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they don’t have any conflict of interest.

Footnotes

Peer review under responsibility of King Saud University.

References

  1. Afsar T., Razak S., Shabbir M., Khan M.R. Antioxidant activity of polyphenolic compounds isolated from ethyl-acetate fraction of Acacia hydaspica R. Parker. Chem. Cent. J. 2018;12(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s13065-018-0373-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Al-Fatimi M., Wurster M., Schröder G., Lindequist U. Antioxidant, antimicrobial and cytotoxic activities of selected medicinal plants from Yemen. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2007;111(3):657–666. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2007.01.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Al-Taweel A.M., Perveen S., Fawzy G.A., Alqasoumi S.I., El Tahir K.E. New flavane gallates isolated from the leaves of Plicosepalus curviflorus and their hypoglycemic activity. Fitoterapia. 2012;83(8):1610–1615. doi: 10.1016/j.fitote.2012.09.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Badr J.M., Ibrahim S.R., Abou-Hussein D.R. Plicosepalin A, a new antioxidant catechin–gallic acid derivative of inositol from the mistletoe Plicosepalus curviflorus. Z. Naturforsch. C. 2016;71(11–12):375–380. doi: 10.1515/znc-2015-0231. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Brand-Williams W., Cuvelier M.E., Berset C. Use of a free radical method to evaluate antioxidant activity. LWT-Food Sci. Tech. 1995;28:25–30. [Google Scholar]
  6. Calvin C.L., Wilson C.A. Comparative morphology of epicortical roots in Old and New World Loranthaceae with reference to root types, origin, patterns of longitudinal extension and potential for clonal growth. Flora. 2006;201(1):51–64. [Google Scholar]
  7. Conner E.M., Grisham M.B. Inflammation, free radicals, and antioxidants. Nutrition. 1996;12:274–277. doi: 10.1016/s0899-9007(96)00000-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Daud A., Gallo A., Riera A.S. Antimicrobial properties of Phrygilanthus acutifolius. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2005;99(2):193–197. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2005.01.043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Davis A.L., Cai Y., Davies A.P., Lewis J.R. 1H and 13C NMR assignments of some green tea polyphenols. Magn. Reson. Chem. 1996;34(11):887–890. [Google Scholar]
  10. El Tahir E.T.P.K. El Tahir Publication; Riyadh: 2007. A Guide to Drug Discovery: Directions for Pharmacological Screening for New Synthetic and Natural Compounds Leading to Discovery of New Medicines; pp. 100–105. [Google Scholar]
  11. Elshanawani M.A. Plants used in Saudi folk-medicine. King Abdulaziz City Sci. Technol. (KACST) 1996:162. [Google Scholar]
  12. Fan J., Johnson M.H., Lila M.A., Yousef G., De Mejia E.G. Berry and citrus phenolic compounds inhibit dipeptidyl peptidase IV: implications in diabetes management. Evid. Based Complement. Alternat. Med. 2013;2013 doi: 10.1155/2013/479505. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Garcia-Mediavilla V., Crespo I., Collado P.S., Esteller A., Sanchez-Campos S., Tunon M.J. The anti-inflammatory flavones quercetin and kaempferol cause inhibition of inducible nitric oxide synthase, cyclooxygenase-2 and reactive C-protein, and down-regulation of the nuclear factor kappaB pathway in Chang Liver cells. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2007;557:221–229. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2006.11.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Halliwell B., Gutteridge J.M. Oxford University Press; USA: 2015. Free Radicals in Biology and Medicine. [Google Scholar]
  15. Harborne J.B., Mabry T.J. Chapman and Hall Ltd; London, UK: 1982. The Flavonoids: Advances in Research. [Google Scholar]
  16. Islam M., Al-Amin M.D., Siddiqi M.M.A., Akter S., Haque M.M., Sultana N., Chowdhury A.S. Isolation of quercetin-3-O-beta-D-glucopyranoside from the leaves of Azadirachta indica and antimicrobial and cytotoxic screening of the crude extracts. Dhaka Uni. J. sci. 2012;60(1):11–14. [Google Scholar]
  17. Kim Y.K., Kim Y.S., Choi S.U., Ryu S.Y. Isolation of flavonol rhamnosides from Loranthus tanakae and cytotoxic effect of them on human tumor cell lines. Arch. Pharmacal. Res. 2004;27(1):44–47. doi: 10.1007/BF02980044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Li Y.Q., Zhou F.C., Gao F., Bian J.S., Shan F. Comparative evaluation of quercetin, isoquercetin and rutin as inhibitors of α-glucosidase. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2009;57(24):11463–11468. doi: 10.1021/jf903083h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Liu C.Y., Chiu Y.J., Kuo C.L., Chien T.M., Wu L.Y., Peng W.H. Analgesic and anti-inflammatory activities of the ethanol extract of Taxillus tsaii Chiu in mice. Drug Dev. Res. 2015;76(4):176–184. doi: 10.1002/ddr.21252. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Lohézic-Le Dévéhat F., Bakhtiar A., Bezivin C., Amoros M., Boustie J. Antiviral and cytotoxic activities of some Indonesian plants. Fitoterapia. 2002;73(5):400–405. doi: 10.1016/s0367-326x(02)00125-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Morales A.I., Vicente-Sanchez C., Jerkic M., Santiago J.M., Sanchez-Gonzalez P.D., Perez-Barriocanal F. Effect of quercetin on metallothionein, nitric oxide synthases and cyclooxygenase-2 expression on experimental chronic cadmium nephrotoxicity in rats. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 2006;210:128–135. doi: 10.1016/j.taap.2005.09.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Mossa J.S. A study on the crude antidiabetic drugs used in Arabian folk medicine. Int. J. Crude. Drug Res. 1985;23:137–145. [Google Scholar]
  23. Mothana R.A., Al-Said M.S., Al-Rehaily A.J., Thabet T.M., Awad N.A., Lalk M., Lindequist U. Anti-inflammatory, antinociceptive, antipyretic and antioxidant activities and phenolic constituents from Loranthus regularis Steud. ex Sprague. Food Chem. 2012;130(2):344–349. [Google Scholar]
  24. Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD) Guidelines for 382 testing of chemicals 423, 2001. Acute oral toxicity–acute toxic class method. #423, Paris, 383 France.
  25. Osadebe P.O., Okide G.B., Akabogu I.C. Study on anti-diabetic activities of crude methanolic extracts of Loranthus micranthus (Linn.) sourced from five different host trees. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2004;95(2–3):133–138. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2004.06.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Pareek H., Sharma S., Khajja B.S., Jain K., Jain G.C. Evaluation of hypoglycemic and anti-hyperglycemic potential of Tridax procumbens (Linn.) BMC Complement. Altern. Med. 2009;9(1):48. doi: 10.1186/1472-6882-9-48. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Peng X., Zhang G., Liao Y., Gong D. Inhibitory kinetics and mechanism of kaempferol on α-glucosidase. Food Chem. 2016;190:207–215. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2015.05.088. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Sadik G., Islam R., Rahman M.M., Khondkar P., Rashid M.A., Sarker S.D. Antimicrobial and cytotoxic constituents of Loranthus globosus. Fitoterapia. 2003;74(3):308–311. doi: 10.1016/s0367-326x(03)00041-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Sarian M.N., Ahmed Q.U., So'ad S.Z.M., Alhassan A.M., Murugesu S., Perumal V. Antioxidant and antidiabetic effects of flavonoids: a structure-activity relationship based study. Biomed. Res. Int. 2017;2017:8386065. doi: 10.1155/2017/8386065. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Sharififar F., Dehghn-Nudeh G., Mirtajaldini M. Major flavonoids with antioxidant activity from Teucrium polium L. Food Chem. 2009;112(4):885–888. [Google Scholar]
  31. Shaw D.C., Watson D.M., Mathiasen R.L. Comparison of dwarf mistletoes (Arceuthobium spp., Viscaceae) in the western United States with mistletoes (Amyema spp., Loranthaceae) in Australia—ecological analogs and reciprocal models for ecosystem management. Aust. J. Bot. 2004;52(4):481–498. [Google Scholar]
  32. Sheila C. Scorbion Publishing Ltd, Victoria House; Essex, England: 1985. An Illustrated Guid to the Flowers of Saudi Arabia; p. 353. [Google Scholar]
  33. Shen C.C., Chang Y.S., Ho L.K. Nuclear magnetic resonance studies of 5, 7-dihydroxyflavonoids. Phytochemistry. 1993;34(3):843–845. [Google Scholar]
  34. Şöhretoğlu D., Sakar M.K., Sabuncuoğlu S.A., Özgüneş H., Sterner O. Antioxidant galloylated flavonoids from Geranium tuberosum L. subsp. tuberosum. Turk. J. Chem. 2009;33(5):685–692. [Google Scholar]
  35. Tadera K., Minami Y., Takamatsu K., Matsuoka T. Inhibition of α-glucosidase and α-amylase by flavonoids. J. Nutr. Sci Vitaminol. 2006;52(2):149–153. doi: 10.3177/jnsv.52.149. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Tanaka T., Nonaka G.I., Nishioka I. 7-O-galloyl-(+)-catechin and 3-O-galloylprocyanidin B-3 from Sanguisorba officinalis. Phytochemistry. 1983;22(11):2575–2578. [Google Scholar]
  37. Tunon M.J., Garcia-Mediavilla M.V., Sanchez-Campos S., Gonzalez-Gallego J. Potential of flavonoids as anti-inflammatory agents: modulation of pro-inflammatory gene expression and signal transduction pathways. Curr. Drug Metabol. 2009;10:256–271. doi: 10.2174/138920009787846369. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Vaknin Y., Tov Y.Y., Eisikowitch D. Flowering seasonality and flower characteristics of Loranthus acaciae Zucc. (Loranthaceae): implications for advertisement and bird-pollination. Sex. Plant. Reprod. 1996;9(5):279–285. [Google Scholar]
  39. Velioglu Y.S., Mazza G., Gao L., Oomah B.D. Antioxidant activity and total phenolics in selected fruits, vegetables, and grain products. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1998;46(10):4113–4117. [Google Scholar]
  40. Vinegar R., Schreiber W., Hugo R. Biphasic development of carrageenin edema in rats. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 1969;166(1):96–103. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Waly N.M., El Din A.A., Jrais R.N. Botanical and Biological studies of six parasitic species of family Loranthaceae growing in Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Int. J. Environ. Sci. 2012;4:196–205. [Google Scholar]
  42. Wang Y., Deng M., Zhang S.Y., Zhou Z.K., Tian W.X. Parasitic Loranthus from Loranthaceae rather than Viscaceae potently inhibits fatty acid synthase and reduces body weight in mice. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2008;118(3):473–478. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2008.05.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Winter C.A., Porter C.C. Effect of alterations in side chain upon anti-inflammatory and liver glycogen activities of hydrocortisone esters. J. Am. Pharm. Assoc. (Scientific ed.) 1957;46(9):515–519. doi: 10.1002/jps.3030460902. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Yang L.L., Yen K.Y., Kiso Y., Hikino H. Antihepatotoxic actions of Formosan plant drugs. J. Ethnopharmacol. 1987;19(1):103–110. doi: 10.1016/0378-8741(87)90142-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Saudi Pharmaceutical Journal : SPJ are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES