Abstract
Osteoarthritis (OA) is a common, painful disease. Currently OA is incurable, and its etiology largely unknown, partly due to limited understanding of OA as a whole-joint disease. Here we report that two homologous microRNAs, miR-204 and miR-211, maintain joint homeostasis to suppress OA pathogenesis. Specific knockout of miR-204/-211 in mesenchymal progenitor cells (MPCs) results in Runx2 accumulation in multi-type joint cells, causing whole-joint degeneration. Specifically, miR-204/-211 loss-of-function induces matrix-degrading proteases in articular chondrocytes and synoviocytes, stimulating articular cartilage destruction. Moreover, miR-204/-211 ablation enhances NGF expression in a Runx2-dependent manner, and thus hyper-activates Akt signaling and MPC proliferation, underlying multiplex non-cartilaginous OA conditions including synovial hyperplasia, osteophyte outgrowth and subchondral sclerosis. Importantly, miR-204/-211-deficiency-induced OA is largely rescued by Runx2 insufficiency, confirming the miR-204/-211-Runx2 axis. Further, intraarticular administration of miR-204-expressing adeno-associated virus significantly decelerates OA progression. Collectively, miR-204/-211 are essential in maintaining healthy homeostasis of mesenchymal joint cells to counteract OA pathogenesis.
Subject terms: miRNAs, Osteoarthritis
Osteoarthritis involves whole-joint tissue degeneration. Here, the authors show that miR-204 and miR-211 in mesenchymal joint cells regulate their proliferation, catabolic and osteogenic responses, and that disease progression is ameliorated by intra-articular miR-204 delivery in mice.
Introduction
Osteoarthritis (OA) is a painful joint disease affecting more than 10% of the adult population1,2. Pathological changes of OA embody multiple manifestations such as articular cartilage (AC) destruction, synovial hyperplasia, osteophyte formation, and subchondral bone sclerosis. In addition, OA patients often show varied symptoms and respond differently to clinical interventions, suggesting that OA is a heterogeneous disease and its management demands therapeutics that offer greater precision3,4. Currently available studies ascribe the pathogenic causes of OA to dysregulation of anabolic and catabolic pathways that affect cartilage matrix maintenance and bone remodeling. However, clinical trials targeting related factors such as matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), inflammatory cytokines, or growth factors, showed mixed results regarding the efficacy or safety of the therapeutics5,6. Thus, development of efficacious OA therapies calls for more in-depth understanding of OA and should benefit from identification of new molecular mechanisms that underlie the complex and multifaceted phenotypes of OA.
Multiple joint tissues undergo structural and functional failure during OA pathogenesis, including AC, meniscus, and synovium. These tissues are mesenchymal or contain significant portions of mesenchymal cells. Moreover, mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) and mesenchymal progenitor cells (MPCs) are thought to exist in these joint tissues and play important roles in joint homeostasis and maintenance7. Importantly, the formation of osteophytes, a prominent radiographic feature of OA and a significant source of pain and joint dysfunction, requires MPCs derived from adjacent areas including periosteum and synovium to recapitulate endochondral ossification8. As miRNAs emerge as important regulators in skeletal pathophysiology9,10, their roles in MPC-derived skeletal tissues remain elusive. Through in vitro work we identified two homologous microRNAs, miR-204 and miR-211, which negatively regulate Runx2 in MPCs11. However, the in vivo functions of miR-204/-211 are largely unknown, especially regarding how they regulate MPCs and the pathophysiology of mesenchyme-derived skeletal tissues like synovial joints.
Here we identify a mechanism by which miR-204/-211 regulate the proliferation and differentiation of MPCs in the entire joint and maintain healthy metabolism of joint tissues, thus helping the joint to counteract OA pathogenesis in a well-rounded manner. Our study takes advantage of in vivo analysis of genetically modified mice with miR-204/-211 deficiency in MPCs and their descendent cells and we reveal that miR-204/-211-Runx2 axis is pivotal in maintaining joint tissue homeostasis. Dysregulation of this signaling pathway leads to multifactorial pathogenesis of OA, particularly with respect to noncartilaginous pathological anabolic changes such as synovial hyperplasia and osteophyte formation. In addition, our results demonstrate that intraarticular reintroduction of miR-204 alleviates OA progression in a surgically induced OA model.
Results
Global deficiency of miR-204/-211 induces OA
Our in vitro data showed that two homologous miRNAs, miR-204 and miR-211, suppress Runx2 expression in MPCs11. However, little is known about their in vivo functions. Thus, we have generated mouse models with conditional knockout (cKO) alleles for miR-204 and miR-211. A diagram of the targeting vector for miR-204 or miR-211 is shown in Fig. 1a. To remove the lacZ and Neo cassettes, we crossed the targeted mice with flippase-expressing transgenic mice, and thus generated floxed alleles for the miRNAs (Fig. 1a, Supplementary Fig. 1a). Since miR-204 or miR-211 was reported to be expressed in a variety of tissues and play diverse pathophysiological roles12–16, we were interested to investigate if genetically modified animals with global deletions of both miRNAs, which were not yet available but are essential to elucidation of the miR-204/-211 functions, showed any aberrant phenotypes. Thus, we crossed CMV-Cre transgenic mice17 with miR-204flox/flox and miR-211flox/flox mice to generate global knockout (KO) of both miRNAs (Supplementary Fig. 1b, c), namely the mice genotyped as miR-204−/−; miR-211−/− mice. These miR-204/-211-deficient mice did not show very apparent abnormality postnatally and postpubertally. However, our preliminary analysis of older global miR-204/-211 KO mice through the Mouse Metabolic Phenotyping Center at University of California, Davis has revealed a spectrum of pathological changes such as hypermature cataracts with rupture, uveal melanosis and melanosis, retinal dysplasia, follicular dysplasia, valvular endocardiosis, etc. (Supplementary Table 1).
We also looked at the knee joint phenotype of the global KO mice. At the age of 9 weeks, the miR-204−/−; miR-211−/− mice did not differ from the wild type in joint histology, particularly in terms of the tibial growth plate length and AC thickness (Supplementary Fig. 1d, f, g). At the age of 15 weeks, the miR-204−/−; miR-211−/− mice still did not show difference in growth plate length, but started to possess increased AC abrasion (Supplementary Fig. 1e, h). Strikingly, examination of the aged miR-204−/−; miR-211−/− mice showed swollen knee joints, which was demonstrated by μCT analysis to contain ectopically grown bone spurs, resembling osteophyte outgrowth in human OA patients (Fig. 1b). The structural deterioration in the knee joints of the mutant mice involved multiple types of tissues inside the joint, as displayed by highly abrasive AC, subchondral bone thickening, severe synovial hyperplasia, excessive osteophyte formation, and meniscus calcification (Fig. 1c−f). As the pathologic condition of human OA disease and a well-established OA model18 (Supplementary Fig. 1i) embodies all of these histological changes, we concluded that the miR-204/-211-deficient mice had undergone OA onset and progression.
Deletion of miR-204/-211 in MPCs promotes OA pathogenesis
The tissues affected by OA pathogenesis in the miR-204/-211 KO mice include AC, meniscus, subchondral bone, synovium and joint capsules, of which all are mesenchymal tissues. This suggested that the phenotype observed in the miR-204/-211 KO mice could be caused by the loss of miR-204/-211 in the mesenchymal stem/progenitor cells, which give rise to these joint tissues. Thus, we decided to specifically delete miR-204/-211 in MPCs by crossing the miR-204flox/flox and miR-211flox/flox mice with Prx1-Cre transgenic mice, in which the Prx1 promoter was reported to drive Cre expression in the early limb bud mesenchyme and in the MPCs19,20.
Single KO mice for miR-204 (miR-204flox/flox; Prx1-Cre) or miR-211 (miR-211flox/flox; Prx1-Cre) did not show obvious joint phenotype (Supplementary Fig. 2a, b). Thus, we focused on breeding and analyzing double KO mice (miR-204flox/flox; miR-211flox/flox; Prx1-Cre, hereafter dKO). Interestingly, we had observed a significantly lower birth ratio of the dKO mice than that of the littermates without Prx1-Cre. This prompted us to perform a whole-genome sequencing, which revealed that the Prx1-Cre transgene is located on Chromosome 7 (Supplementary Fig. 2c) where miR-211 also resides. Thus, the lower ratio of the dKO mice was largely contributed by the genetic linkage between miR-211 and transgenic Prx1-Cre. Meanwhile, we have not observed significant gross abnormality of the dKO pups, which survived as well as their Prx1-Cre− littermates, suggesting that the ablation of miR-204/-211 has no apparent impacts on skeletal development and growth in the young mice.
We examined the dKO mice to identify if the OA phenotype caused by a global deficiency of miR-204/-211 could be recapitulated by the loss of the miRNAs in MPCs. The μCT scanning of the knee joints of 42-week-old mice revealed striking osteophyte growth (Fig. 2a). Further histology analysis of the dKO mice confirmed strong OA-like phenotypes, including synovial hyperplasia, cartilage degradation, subchondral sclerosis, osteophyte formation, and narrowed knee joint space (Fig. 2b). Particularly, the OA phenotypes developed gradually with age, as exemplified by 42-week-old mice showing more severe synovial hyperplasia and cartilage degradation than 33-week-old mice (Fig. 2b). It is notable that osteophytes were accompanied by more ectopic cartilage formation (blue staining) in 33-week-old mice than in 42-week-old mice, suggesting that osteophyte growth was preluded by excess cartilage formation (Fig. 2b). In other words, osteophyte growth in the dKO knee joints resulted from de novo endochondral ossification that requires cartilaginous templates derived from MPCs. Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OARSI) scoring21 also demonstrated more severe cartilage destruction in the dKO mice and a progressive OA development (Supplementary Fig. 2d). As pain is the most common individual burden for OA patients and the most prominent symptom of OA, we also performed behavioral pain tests and found that the dKO mice had increased pain sensitivity compared with Prx1-Cre-negative littermates (Fig. 2c). Thus, our results suggested that the deficiency of miR-204/-211 in MPCs and mesenchymal joint tissues contributed to the genesis of OA pain, possibly through the structural deterioration of the joint.
Next, we performed in situ hybridization (ISH) assays with highly specific locked nucleic acid (LNA)-enhanced miRNA probes to determine the expression of miR-204 and miR-211 in the control and dKO mice. Our results demonstrated that both miR-204 and miR-211 are expressed in knee joint tissues, such as AC, meniscus and synovium, which all have mesenchymal origin (Fig. 2d, e, Supplementary Fig. 2e, f). As well, immunohistochemistry (IHC) assays showed that the Prx1 promoter drives Cre expression in AC, meniscus and synovium, suggesting a comprehensive deletion of miR-204/-211 in joint tissues by Prx1-Cre (Supplementary Fig. 2g). Significantly diminished ISH signals of miR-204 (or miR-211) were displayed in AC, synovium and meniscus of dKO mice (Fig. 2d, e), suggesting that miR-204 and miR-211 had been effectively and specifically deleted in multiple types of mesenchymal tissues in the joint. Moreover, quantitative RT-PCR (qRT-PCR) assays demonstrated that both miR-204 and miR-211 significantly decreased in RNAs extracted from AC or synovium (Supplementary Fig. 2h, i), while the gene expression of the miRNA host genes (Trpm3 and Trpm1) had no significant change (Supplementary Fig. 2j, k). To further confirm the ablation of miR-204/-211 in other mesenchymal tissues particularly bone marrow MPCs, we also isolated and cultured CD45− bone marrow stromal cells (BMSCs), of which the major fraction was shown to be MPCs22 (Supplementary Fig. 3). Subsequent qRT-PCR experiments showed a 90% reduction of miR-204/-211 in CD45− BMSCs isolated from the dKO mice (Fig. 2f, g). Together, our results confirmed that miR-204/-211 are effectively deleted in mesenchymal tissues, including AC, meniscus and synovium of the knee joints.
Deficiency of miR-204/-211 elevates Runx2 and OA markers
The CD45− BMSCs deficient of miR-204/-211 may be used for the confirmation of the interacting machinery between miR-204/-211 and Runx2 mRNA at the molecular level. Thus, we applied the cross-linking and immunoprecipitation (CLIP) technique23 to purify the complex comprising Argonaute (AGO) proteins, Ago-bound miRNAs and miRNA-targeting mRNAs24. Our results demonstrated that miR-204/-211 bind to Runx2 mRNA at two binding sites (Supplementary Fig. 4a). Furthermore, ablation of miR-204/-211 in CD45− BMSCs significantly decreased the ligated chimera between miR-204/-211 and Runx2 mRNA (Supplementary Fig. 4b), suggesting that miR-204/-211 deletion impaired the formation of the AGO-miR-204/-211-Runx2 mRNA tertiary complex and therefore relieved Runx2 suppression by miR-204/-211.
In addition, our IHC results showed that protein levels of Runx2 were significantly elevated in AC, meniscus and synovium, especially in thickened synovium and osteophyte tissues (Fig. 3a, Supplementary Fig. 4c). Besides mesenchymal tissues in knee joints, CD45− BMSCs of the dKO mice also showed higher expression of Runx2 proteins (Fig. 3b). These results collectively suggest that miR-204/-211 deletion in MPCs caused significant accumulation of Runx2 in a variety of MPC-derived mesenchymal tissues. Runx2 has been reported to induce matrix-degrading enzymes such as MMP13, Adamts5 and Adamts425–28, which are upregulated during OA development and therefore deemed as OA marker genes. Thus, we performed IHC to determine if the OA phenotype in the dKO mice is associated with upregulation of cartilage-degrading enzymes. Our results showed that protein levels of MMP13, Adamts5 (Fig. 3c, Supplementary Fig. 4d, e) and Adamts4 (Supplementary Fig. 4f, g) were significantly elevated in joint tissues, such as AC, meniscus and synovium, of the dKO mice. In addition, we extracted total RNA from AC of knee joint and found that mRNA levels of Mmp13 and Adamts5 increased in the dKO mice, suggesting that Mmp13 and Adamts5 were upregulated at transcriptional level (Fig. 3d), possibly due to elevated Runx2 levels. Together, our results suggest that the ablation of miR-204 and miR-211 in mesenchymal tissues causes Runx2 accumulation and subsequent induction of proteases, including MMP13, Adamts5 and Adamts4, which mediate catabolic activities in AC degradation and contribute to OA pathogenesis.
OA is a complex degenerative joint disorder involving not only cartilage catabolism but also anabolic effects including osteophyte formation and subchondral bone sclerosis, two remarkable exhibitions of aberrantly enhanced osteogenesis. As Runx2 is a master regulator in bone formation, we asked if skeletal stem/progenitor cells from the dKO mice, which showed higher Runx2 levels than the cells from the control mice (Fig. 3b), possessed augmented osteogenic activity. We isolated and cultured BMSCs for alkaline phosphatase (ALP), Alizarin red and von Kossa staining, and found that osteoblast differentiation in the cells with miR-204/-211 deletion accelerated (Fig. 3e−g). We also purified CD45− BMSCs from the dKO mice and found that the mRNA levels of osteoblast markers such as Osterix, Alp and osteocalcin increased markedly in the dKO cells (Fig. 3h), suggesting that loss-of-function of miR-204/-211 in skeletal progenitor cells promotes osteoblast differentiation. Combined with the IHC data that demonstrated Runx2 accumulation in joint tissues, our results suggest that increased subchondral bone formation and osteophyte outgrowth could result from enhanced Runx2 levels and elevated osteogenic activity, which are mediated by miR-204/-211 deletion in mesenchymal tissues.
Induced MPC proliferation/synovial hyperplasia in dKO joints
We also observed synovial hyperplasia in the dKO mice, which represents an important pathological manifestation of OA. As fibroblast-like synovial cells are of mesenchymal origin and display MSC properties such as self-renewal and multipotentiality29, we investigated if the deficiency of miR-204/-211 in MPCs caused aberrant proliferation of mesenchymal cells in synovium, which could underlie hypertrophy of nonhematopoietic tissues in synovium. Firstly, we isolated synovial cells from the dKO mice for flow cytometry to assess the frequency of MPCs in synovial cells. Four cell surface markers were used: CD45 is a hematopoietic cell marker while CD29, CD105 and Sca-1 are markers for MSCs22. The frequencies of CD29+CD105+Sca-1+ MSCs in CD45− nonhematopoietic synoviocytes were significantly higher in the dKO mice than those in their Cre− littermates (Fig. 4a, b), suggesting that miR-204/-211-deficient mesenchymal cells in synovium underwent increased proliferation. To assess cell proliferation in the joint tissues, we performed IHC to examine the level of proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) or Ki-67, and found that positive staining for PCNA and Ki-67 was significantly elevated in the dKO joint tissues, particularly in hypertrophied synovium, indicating excessive proliferation of synovial cells (Fig. 4c, Supplementary Fig. 5a, b). Also, we injected BrdU into the dKO mice and performed flow cytometry to evaluate the percentage of BrdU-positive mesenchymal cells in bone marrow. Our results showed that the frequencies of BrdU+CD45− cells, which represent proliferating nonhematopoietic cells, were significantly higher in the dKO mice than in the control mice (Fig. 4d, e), suggesting that mesenchymal cells with the miR-204/-211 deficiency retains an enhanced proliferative ability. As well, we observed that the frequencies of CD45−/CD29+/CD105+/Sca-1+ cells in bone marrow cells were also higher in the dKO mice (Supplementary Fig. 5c, d). Together, our results suggest that miR-204/-211 ablation results in a greater proliferation rate of MPCs, which provides excessive mesenchymal cells and therefore contributes significantly to synovial hyperplasia in the dKO mice.
While our results demonstrated indispensable roles of miR-204/-211 in modulating mesenchymal cell differentiation and catabolism to ameliorate cartilage degradation and ectopic bone formation, our data also revealed an unanticipated facet of miR-204/-211 regulation that could be related to the proliferation of MPCs. To further investigate the mechanism altering the proliferation of the dKO cells, we analyzed mRNA expression of cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) inhibitors, such as p16, p21, p27 and p57, in CD45− BMSCs derived from the dKO mice. Consistent with increased proliferation of mesenchymal cells as shown by BrdU labeling experiments, the mRNA levels of CDK inhibitors decreased substantially (Fig. 4f), suggesting that miR-204/-211 loss-of-function has negative effects on CDK inhibitors to promote cell cycle progression in MPCs.
Elevated Akt signaling and NGF expression in dKO joints
Because Akt signaling is reported to be pivotal for cell cycle regulation through blocking transcription of CDK inhibitors30, we performed western blot assays to determine if activation of Akt signaling is associated with enhanced proliferation of CD45− BMSCs from miR-204/-211-deficient mice. We found that miR-204/-211 ablation in CD45− BMSCs dramatically increased the Thr308 phosphorylation of Akt proteins, while leaving the amount of total Akt proteins unchanged (Fig. 5a). We also carried out IHC on joint sections and found higher phospho-Akt level in the dKO mice than their Cre− littermates, especially in hypertrophied synovium and ectopic bone/cartilage-like structures (Fig. 5b, Supplementary Fig. 6a), suggesting that Akt hyperactivation in mesenchymal tissues contributes to synovial hyperplasia and osteophyte outgrowth observed in the dKO mice.
Activation of Akt signaling cascade can occur with stimulation of receptor tyrosine kinases (RTK) by their ligands31. We found that mRNAs coding for nerve growth factor (NGF) were substantially upregulated in CD45− BMSCs derived from dKO mice (Fig. 5c), which have been demonstrated to be comprised of mainly MPCs (Supplementary Fig. 3). The mRNA expression of Ngf is abundant in CD45− BMSCs (ΔCt ≈ 5 compared to β-actin), suggesting that NGF is an endogenous player in mesenchymal cells. We also performed IHC on the dKO knee joint sections and found that NGF protein levels increased significantly in periarticular tissues, especially in synovium and newly formed ectopic cartilage/bone (Fig. 5d, Supplementary Fig. 6b), suggesting that aberrant increase of NGF, a major mediator of OA pain, is also associated with synovial hyperplasia and osteophyte formation in the dKO mice. To further confirm that NGF expression is induced by miR-204/-211 loss-of-function and Runx2 accumulation, we introduced synthetic miR-204 mimics or Runx2 siRNAs into CD45− BMSCs and found that both miR-204 and Runx2 siRNAs suppressed Ngf mRNA expression in CD45− BMSCs (Fig. 5e), which may be mediated by the decrease of Runx2 levels by miR-204 or by Runx2 siRNAs (Supplementary Fig. 6c). These results indicate that miR-204 and miR-211 modulates NGF expression, Akt activation and cell proliferation through its regulation of Runx2. Retroviral overexpression of two NGF isoforms, i.e. NGF-A and NGF-B, both activated Akt signaling, as the results of western blots showed elevated levels of p-PI3K, p-Akt and cyclin D1 in NGF-transduced CD45− progenitor cells (Fig. 5f). As well, NGF overexpression increased CD45− cell proliferation (Fig. 5g). Importantly, the overexpression of NGF in CD45− BMSCs significantly inhibited the mRNA expression of CDK inhibitors, such as p16, p21, p27 and p57 (Fig. 5h). Accordingly, the knockdown of Ngf by its siRNA transfection significantly reduced p-Akt protein levels and cell proliferation rate in CD45− BMSCs (Fig. 5i, Supplementary Fig. 6d). Collectively, these results suggested that Runx2 accumulation induced by miR-204/-211 depletion upregulates Ngf expression to activate Akt signaling and then to promote MPC proliferation, which may constitute a major source of excessive mesenchymal cells contributing to deleterious anabolic events in OA, including synovial hyperplasia, osteophyte outgrowth and subchondral sclerosis.
Administration of miR-204 alleviates surgery-induced OA
The dKO mice displayed severe, comprehensive OA phenotype, including AC degradation, subchondral sclerosis, osteophyte formation and synovial hyperplasia, suggesting that endogenous miR-204/-211 play a key role in maintaining joint tissue homeostasis and preventing OA development. Thus, we ask if OA could be treated by administrating miR-204, as miR-204 and miR-211 share redundant functions and overexpression of one miRNA rescues the double knockout of two homologous miRNAs32. We performed partial meniscectomy to induce the onset of OA33, and then used intraarticular injection of adeno-associated virus (AAV) serotype 534 to express miR-204 in OA-inflicted knee joints. Three months after injection, we could still detect AAV expression in a variety of joint tissues including AC, meniscus and synovium (Supplementary Fig. 7), suggesting that AAV5 administered by intraarticular injection can drive potent and long-lasting gene expression in knee joints.
Next, we performed phenotypic analysis to investigate how miR-204 administration affects OA pathogenesis in the surgical OA model. Notably, μCT analysis showed that injection of AAV5-miR-204 diminished osteophyte growth significantly, compared with that of AAV5-control (Fig. 6a). Further, histological examination confirmed a substantial decrease of osteophyte formation and revealed marked mitigation regarding synovial hyperplasia and cartilage degradation in miR-204-injected joints (Fig. 6b, c). In pain-related behavioral tests, mice receiving miR-204 injection showed higher pain thresholds than those receiving control AAV5 injection (Fig. 6d), suggesting that miR-204 reintroduction in OA knee joints not only ameliorated histological features, including AC degradation and osteophyte formation, but also reduced pain, a prominent symptom affecting OA patients. We also used IHC to examine the protein levels of Runx2 and several OA markers, and found that miR-204 administration alleviated the upregulation of Runx2, Adamts5 and MMP13, which was induced by the surgery (Fig. 6e−h). Together, our exploration of miR-204 administration in vivo suggest that miR-204 could act as an effective therapeutic agent to treat OA in a surgically induced OA mouse model, through inhibition of Runx2 expression in multiple joint tissues.
The Runx2-miR-204/-211 axis controls OA pathogenesis
Accumulating evidence generated in this study points to miR-204/-211-regulated Runx2 that acts as a central player in OA onset and progression. To alleviate Runx2 accumulation caused by the ablation of miR-204/-211 in skeletal cells, we introduced Runx2 haploinsufficiency into the dKO mice by generating the miR-204flox/flox; miR-211flox/flox; Runx2+/flox; Prx1-Cre mice, hereafter tKO. Comparison of tKO and dKO mice revealed that the OA phenotype observed in the dKO mice has been largely ameliorated in the tKO mice. Specifically, the tKO mice possessed less degradation of AC in their knee joints than the dKO littermates, as demonstrated by histological analyses. Moreover, we have observed an effective diminish of synovial hyperplasia and osteophyte outgrowth in the tKO than in the dKO mice (Fig. 7a, Supplementary Fig. 8). These results suggest that Runx2 insufficiency can significantly mitigate the severe OA phenotype caused by miR-204/-211 ablation in the skeletal cells.
To investigate if reduction of Runx2 protein levels was a causal factor in OA phenotype alleviation, we performed IHC assays to examine Runx2 protein levels in the tKO mice. Our results showed that Runx2 insufficiency markedly attenuated the Runx2 accumulating effects resulting from miR-204/-211 deficiency, in AC, meniscus and synovium (Fig. 7b). As Runx2 level returned to normal as similar as that in the control mice, the tKO mice also showed a remarkable extenuation in cartilage-catabolic factors including Adamts5 and MMP13 compared to the dKO littermates (Fig. 7c, d). Thus, our results suggest that heterozygous deficiency of Runx2 rescued the OA phenotype resulting from miR-204/-211 deletion and readjusted Runx2 proteins to a normal physiologic level, and therefore significantly mitigated the severe OA phenotype observed in the dKO mice. Further, we conclude that miR-204/-211 control Runx2 expression and the Runx2-miR-204/-211 axis governs OA pathogenesis.
Discussion
Currently, many mechanistic OA studies focus on cartilaginous tissues35–38, since cartilage is a key component of synovial joints and cartilaginous tissues are exposed to mechanical stress that was thought to be a major risk factor for OA. Therefore, cartilage destruction is deemed to be a landmark event during OA onset and progression. In this study, we have generated a new mouse model in which miR-204/-211 are deleted in multiple joint tissues and a comprehensive OA-like phenotype is observed in the entire joint but not restricted to cartilage only. For example, we found that the dKO mice develop severe synovial hyperplasia, which may have instrumental effects on other manifestations of OA, such as induced matrix-degrading enzymes on cartilage breakdown and elevated NGF on increased pain sensitivity and MPC proliferation. Osteophyte formation is also a prominent feature displayed in the dKO mice, and we found that osteophyte outgrowth is significantly contributed by excessive proliferation of MPCs, which implicates a mechanistic similarity between osteophyte formation in OA pathogenesis and endochondral ossification in skeletal development. Thus, our dKO mice could represent a comprehensive OA model, of which the analysis provides multifaceted insights into the mechanism of OA initiation and progression as well as the metabolic maintenance of the joint.
When we were generating the dKO mice, we had observed a much lower ratio of the dKO pups than that of the miR-204flox/flox;miR-211flox/flox pups or the miR-204flox/flox;miR-211+/flox;Prx1-Cre pups. This made us wonder if significant prenatal lethality of the dKO mice occurred or the Prx1-Cre transgene is physically linked to the miR-211 gene. Through whole-genome sequencing we have identified that the Prx1-Cre transgene is located on mouse Chromosome 7 (Supplemental Fig. 2c), the same chromosome on which the mouse miR-211 gene also resides. Further we found that the ratio of the dKO pups was largely Mendelian if we crossed a dKO male to a miR-204flox/flox;miR-211flox/flox female. These dKO mice did not show apparent abnormalities in young ages and their knee joint phenotypes were not significant at 3-month-old. However, the OA-like features of the dKO mice were aggravated with aging and the severity culminated at the ages of 10–12 months, which is milder than those genetic modified mouse models with disruption of major signaling pathways39–41, but bears greater resemblance to human OA. Thus, the use of the Prx1 promoter and the miR-204/-211 deletion at earlier stages in these dKO mice may not greatly affect their development and growth, suggesting that the OA phenotype observed at the later stages (>6 months) may be associated with accrual of miR-deficient effects in aging rather than in embryonic/developmental stages. On the other hand, an extensive deletion of miR-204/-211 in MPCs as well as various types of mesenchymal cells inside the joints demonstrated multifaceted roles of miR-204/-211 and generated comprehensive pathological changes not restricted to cartilage degradation. While the use of arguably more cartilage-specific promoters such as those of Aggrecan and Col2a1 would provide cartilage-focused information for OA studies, miRNA ablation in MPCs offers a unique and resourceful perspective which help to advance our understanding of pathological changes of the entire joint.
OA can be regarded as a mesenchymal disease as it affects the entire synovial joint, which contains multiple connective tissues derived from MPCs, or in a broader context, MSCs. In addition, MSCs are reported to be available in most joint tissues, including synovium42, meniscus43 and cartilage44, which act as reservoirs of progenitor cells for tissue maintenance and repair as well as sources of paracrine signaling. Thus, the proper condition of MSCs is vital to the health of diarthrodial joints and OA pathogenesis involves dysregulation of MSC biology. In our study, miR-204/-211 deficiency in MPCs causes detrimental alterations in both proliferation and differentiation, underlying multiple pathological anabolic properties of OA such as synovial hyperplasia, osteophyte outgrowth and subchondral sclerosis. Also, NGF overexpression in MPCs may constitute an important mechanistic cause for inappropriate nerve growth inside joints and resultant OA pain hypersensitivity. Due to the abilities of tissue regeneration and repair of MSCs which help to combat diseases such as OA and myocardial infarction as well as their immunomodulatory effects to alleviate immune disorders such as multiple sclerosis and Crohn’s disease45, the numbers of registered clinical trials of MSC-based therapies are rapidly increasing46,47. As our study demonstrated that miR-204/-211 deficiency dysregulates the proliferation and differentiation of MPCs and thus causes OA phenotype, it also highlighted the importance of enhancing the understanding of MSC biology, which will help to develop safer MSC therapy and achieve better clinical outcomes.
In summary, our study of miR-204/-211-deficient mice suggests that the loss-of-function of miR-204/-211 in MPCs leads to aberrant accumulation of Runx2, abnormally increases proliferation and osteogenic differentiation of MPCs, and causes comprehensive OA phenotype. Thus, our results suggest that miR-204/-211 are essential for the joint to maintain healthy homeostasis and counteract OA pathogenesis.
Methods
Generation of miR-204/-211 cKO mice
The animal protocol of this study has been approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) of the Rush University Medical Center and all experimental methods and procedures were carried out in accordance with the approved guidelines to comply with all relevant ethical regulations for animal testing and research. To generate miR-204/-211 floxed mice, we engineered the targeting vectors for miR-204 and miR-211 using the recombineering-based method48,49. Briefly, an IRES-lacZ reporter cassette as wells as a loxP site were inserted 178 bp or 171 bp upstream miR-204 or miR-211 stem loop and a loxP site plus a Neomycin selection cassette were placed 260 bp or 365 bp downstream miRNA stem loops. Both lacZ and Neo cassettes are flanked by Frt or F3 (a mutant of Frt) sites, allowing the subsequent removal of both cassettes by crossing the chimeric mice to flippase-expressing transgenic mice (The Jackson Laboratory, stock #: 003946)50 and leaving two loxP sites immediately flanking the miRNA stem-loops. Thus, the exogenous sequences brought by the targeting of miRNAs are minimal (146 nt at 5′ and 110 nt at 3′ for both floxed alleles) and did not affect the expression or intron splicing of host genes, Trpm3 or Trpm1, of which miR-204 or miR-211 is located in the introns (data not shown). Floxed mice (miR-204flox/flox or miR-211flox/flox) were backcrossed to C57BL/6 for over ten generations. To generate dKO mice (miR-204flox/flox; miR-211flox/flox; Prx1-Cre), male Prx1-Cre transgenic mice19 (The Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, ME, USA) with the genotype of miR-204flox/flox; miR-211+/flox, namely miR-204flox/flox; miR-211+/flox; Prx1-Cre, were used to cross to female double floxed mice. To generate germline deletions of the miRNAs, CMV-Cre mice17 (The Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, ME, USA) were used.
AAV intraarticular injection and surgically induced OA model
We chose intraarticular injection of recombinant AAV for in vivo overexpression of miR-204. Both AAV5-EF1a-mmu-mir-204-GFP and AAV5-EF1a-ctrl-GFP were purchased from Vector Biolabs (Malvern, PA, USA). The pri-miR-204 sequence is located in the intron of the EF1a promoter that drives GFP expression, which will be used as a marker for detection of the miR-204 expression introduced by AAV. We performed the surgery of partial meniscectomy on the right knee of wild type (WT) C57BL/6 mice to induce OA 10 days before they turned 3-month-old33. Ten days later, we performed intraarticular injection. Specifically, a longitudinal skin incision was made to visualize the patellar ligament and the patella; then we injected 5 × 109 AAV particles in a 10 µl volume into the knee joint cavity by inserting a small needle into the area underneath the patella of the right leg.
Tissue/cell isolation and culture
Mouse synovium were isolated from mouse knee joints51. Briefly, a skin incision was made to expose knee joints and quadriceps were resected and reversed distally to remove patella and patellar ligament. As a result, the synovium below patella were exposed for visualization and isolation. For synovial cell isolation, isolated synovium were incubated in 0.1% collagenase D (Roche, Indianapolis, IN, USA) for 15 min. Mouse articular chondrocytes were isolated according to a published protocol52 and cultured before analysis. Mouse bone marrow cells were isolated from long bones and cultured for 5 days in α-minimal essential medium (α-MEM) (Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY, USA) with 20% fetal bovine serum (FBS) (Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY, USA) and then in α-MEM with 10% FBS for a longer duration. CD45− BMSC purification was performed by anti-CD45-mediated negative selection22. Specifically, fewer than 107 cells were resuspended in 100 µl supplied buffer and incubated with 10 µl CD45 MicroBeads (Miltenyi Biotec, Cologne, Germany) for 15 min at 4–8 °C. After washing, the cell-MicroBead complexes were subjected to magnetic separation and the flow-through was resuspended in α-MEM with 10% FBS and plated in culture dishes. To induce osteoblast differentiation, after reaching 100% confluency, cells were cultured in α-MEM supplemented with 10% FBS, 10 nM dexamethasone, 50 µg/ml ascorbic acid and 10 mM β-glycerophosphate. Alkaline phosphatase (ALP) and Alizarin red staining were performed using 1-Step™ NBT/BCIP Substrate Solution (Thermo Fisher, Catalog number: 34042) and 0.5% Alizarin red Staining solution11. Von Kossa staining was performed by placing cell culture plates submerged with 1% silver nitrate under the UV lamp for 10 min.
In vitro assays
For transfection of miRNA or siRNA oligos, Lipofectamine RNAi MAX transfection reagent (Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY, USA) was used and siRNAs against Runx2, or Ngf (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) or miR-204 mimic (Dharmacon, Lafayette, CO, USA) were transfected at a concentration of 50 nM. Retroviral vectors for mouse Ngf overexpression were constructed using the forward primer for Ngf-A (5′-TATAGAATTCATGCTGTGCCTCAAGCCAGTG-3′) or for Ngf-B (5′-TATAGAATTCATGTCCATGTTGTTCTACACTC-3′) and the reverse primer (5′-TATACTCGAGTCAGCCTCTTCTTGTAGCCTT-3′, for both Ngf isoforms) to amplify two Ngf isoforms which were digested with EcoRI and XhoI and then ligated to pMX vector. The preparation and infection of retrovirus were performed as follows53. Briefly, Plat-E packaging cells were cultured in DMEM (Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY, USA) with 10% FBS and transfected with pMX retroviral vectors as described11. After 48 h, the retroviral supernatant was collected and used to infect cells. Selection was performed using 5 µg/ml puromycin (EMD Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA) for 2–3 weeks. Western blot analysis was performed11, using antibodies against Runx2 (1:1,000, D130-3, MBL, Woburn, MA, USA), β-actin (1: 10,000, A5441, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), phospho-Akt Thr308 (1: 1000, #9275), total Akt (1: 3000, #9272), phospho-PI3 Kinase p85 (Tyr458)/p55 (Tyr199) (1:1000, #4228), and NGF (1:1000, #2046) (the last four antibodies all from Cell Signaling, Danvers, MA, USA). Uncropped and unprocessed scans of the most important blots are supplied in the Source Data file. CLIP assays were performed as follows54. Briefly, CD45− BMSCs were rinsed with PBS, then irradiated at 400 mJ cm−2 (setting of 4000 and λ = 254 nm). Then we lysate the cells on ice for 10 min in 1 ml buffer with 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.8), 300 mM NaCl, 1% NP-40, 5 mM EDTA (pH 8.0) and 10% glycerol, 5 mM β-mercaptoethanol and protease inhibitors. Cleared lysates will be incubated with anti-Ago (mouse anti-Ago 2A8, Millipore, cat. no. MABE56) magnetic beads for 1 h and then washed with lysis buffer for three times. The Ago-binding beads were then treated with diluted RNase, T4 PNK, T4 RNA ligase and Shrimp Alkaline Phosphatase sequentially. Qiagen miRNeasy kit was used to purify RNA from the beads and reverse transcription was performed using qScript microRNA cDNA Synthesis Kit (Quantabio). PCR were then performed using primer pairs covering miR-204 and putative binding sites of Runx2 3′-UTR. For profiling gene expressions, quantitative RT-PCR was performed, using the primer pairs for Runx2 (5′-CAAGAAGGCTCTGGCGTTTA-3′ and 5′-TGCAGCCTTAAATGACTCGG-3′), Alp (5′-CCAACTCTTTTGTGCCAGAGA-3′ and 5′-GGCTACATTGGTGTTGAGCTTTT-3′), osterix (5′-AGAGGTTCACTCGCTCTGACGA-3′ and 5′-TTGCTCAAGTGGTCGCTTCTG-3′), osteocalcin (5′-CTGACCTCACAGATGCCAAGC-3′ and 5′-TGGTCTGATAGCTCGTCACA AG-3′), p16 (5′-GAACTCTTTCGGTCGTACCC-3′ and 5′-GTTCGAATCTGCACCGTAGT-3′), p21 (5′-CCTGGTGATGTCCGACCTG-3′ and 5′-CCATGAGCGCATCGCAATC-3′), p27 (5′-TCAAACGTGAGAGTGTCTAACG-3′ and 5′-CCGGGCCGAAGAGATTTCTG-3′), p57 (5′-CGAGGAGCAGGACGAGAATC-3′ and 5′-GAAGAAGTCGTTCGCATTGGC-3′), Mmp13 (5′-CTTCTTCTTGTTGAGCTGGACTC-3′ and 5′-CTGTGGAGGTCACTGTA GACT-3′), Adamts5 (5′-GGAGCGAGGCCATTTACAAC-3′ and 5′-CGTAGACAAGGTAG CCCACTTT-3′), Ngf (5′-ACTGGACTAAACTTCAGCAT TCC-3′ and 5′-GGGCAGCTATT GGTGCAGTA-3′) and β-actin (5′-GGCTGTATTCCCCTCCATCG-3′ and 5′-CCAGTTGG TAACAATGCCATGT-3′). Specifically, for mouse miR-204 and miR-211 qRT-PCR, the reverse transcription primer is mmu-miR-204/-211-RT (5′-GTCGTATCCAGTGCAGGGTCCGAGG TATTCGCACTGGATACGACAGGCAW-3′), and the PCR primers are mmu-miR-204 forward (5′-GGGCTTCCCTTTGTCATCCTAT-3′), mmu-miR-211 forward (5′- GGGCTTCCCTTT GTCATCCTT-3′) and the reverse primer (5′-CCAGTGCAGGGTCCGAGGT-3′).
Micro-CT, histology, ISH, IHC and histomorphometry
We used a Scanco µCT35 scanner (Scanco Medical, Brüttisellen, Switzerland) with 55 kVp source and 145 μAmp current for formalin-fixed mouse legs with a resolution of 10 μm. The scanned images from each group were evaluated at the same thresholds to allow three-dimensional structural rendering of each sample. For histology, ISH and IHC, tissues were fixed in 10% formalin, decalcified, and embedded in paraffin. Serial sagittal sections of knee joints were cut every 3 μm from the medial compartments. The sections were stained with Alcian blue/hematoxylin & orange G (AB/H&OG) for histological analysis. OARSI scoring was performed to evaluate knee joint AC destruction essentially55. Specifically, both medial femoral condyle and medial tibial plateau were analyzed through three-level sections of the joints and the severity of OA is expressed as the summed scores for the entire joint.
We performed in situ hybridizations on 3-μm-thick sections using the microRNA ISH Buffer and Controls Kit (Exiqon, Vedbaek, Denmark). Briefly, sections were deparaffinized, permeabilized with Proteinase K for 10 min at 37 °C, treated with 3% H2O2 to block endogenous peroxidase activity and then dehydrated before applying 40 nM double-DIG LNA™ microRNA probe for miR-204 or miR-211, both of which were purchased from Exiqon. Hybridization was performed for 1 h at 53 °C for mmu-miR-204, and 48 °C for mmu-miR-211 respectively. After serial washes with 5× SSC buffer, 1× SSC buffer and 0.2× SSC buffer, sections were incubated with blocking solution for 15 min, and then applied with anti-DIG-POD antibodies (Roche Applied Science, Indianapolis, IN, USA). Lastly, TSA-plus FITC substrate (Perkin Elmer, Waltham, MA, USA) was applied for detection of fluorescent signal and VECTASHIELD Mounting Medium with DAPI (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA, USA) was used to mount the slides. For IHC, 3 μm paraffin sections were heated at 95 °C in Antigen Unmasking Solution (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA, USA) for 10–15 min, and then sequentially treated with 3% H2O2, 0.5% Triton X-100, Avidin/Biotin Blocking Kit (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). After blocking with 10% normal goat serum (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA, USA) for 1 h, sections were treated with 1/200 anti-Runx2 antibody (D130-3, MBL, Woburn, MA, USA), 1/200 phospho-Akt antibody (#9275, Cell Signaling, Danvers, MA, USA), 1/2000 PCNA antibody (ab29, Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA), 1/200 MMP13 antibody (MAB13424, EMD Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA), 1/500 Adamts5 antibody (ab41037, Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA), 1/1000 Cre antibody (69050, Novagen, Billerica, MA, USA), 1/200 NGF antibody (ab6199, Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA), or 1/500 Adamts4 (ab185722, Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA) antibody overnight at 4 °C and incubated with 1/400 secondary biotinylated goat anti-rabbit or anti-mouse antibody (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA, USA) for 30 min, followed by treatment with VECTASTAIN Elite ABC Kit (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA, USA). IHC signals were revealed by ImmPACT DAB Peroxidase Substrate (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA, USA). For fluorescence immunostaining, sections were incubated with 1/250 Ki67 antibody (ab15580, Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA) overnight at 4 °C and then incubated with secondary antibody conjugated to Alexa Fluor 488 (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) for 30 min. Images of histology, ISH and IHC were captured using CellSens Imaging Software (Olympus) on an Olympus BX43 microscope, or a Zeiss LSM700 confocal microscope. Histomorphometric measurements were performed using OsteoMeasure software (OsteoMetrics, Inc., Atlanta, GA, USA).
Flow cytometry
After 2-week culture in α-MEM plus 10% FBS, mouse BMSCs were trypsinized, pelleted and then resuspended in PBS containing 2% FBS to a concentration of 2 × 106 cells/ml. Freshly isolated bone marrow cells were resuspended to a concentration no more than 1 × 107 cells/ml. Cells were stained with anti-mouse CD45 PerCP-Cy5.5 (eBioscience, 45-0451-80), anti-mouse/rat CD29 PE-Cy7 (eBioscience, 25-0291-80), anti-mouse CD105 (Endoglin) PE (eBioscience, 12-1051-81), and anti-mouse Ly-6A/E (Sca-1) APC (eBioscience, 17-5981-81), and analyzed with an LSRII cytometer (Becton Dickinson, San Jose, CA, USA). For BrdU Incorporation, the mice were intraperitoneally labeled twice (a 16-h interval) with 1 mg/mouse/injection BrdU and euthanized 2 h after the second injection. Freshly harvested bone marrow was treated with 1× RBC Lysis Buffer (eBiosciences, San Diego, CA, USA). The remaining cells were stained with anti-mouse CD45 PerCP-Cy5.5, anti-mouse/rat CD29 PE-Cy7, anti-mouse CD105 (Endoglin) PE, and anti-mouse Ly-6A/E (Sca-1) Alexa Fluor 700 (eBioscience, 56-5981-82) before permeabilization, DNase treatment and staining with anti-BrdU APC according to the instruction of APC BrdU Flow Kits (BD Pharmagen, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA). The percentage of BrdU-positive fractions was assessed using FlowJo analysis software (Tree Star, Ashland, OR, USA).
Animal behavioral tests
Testing for mechanical allodynia (von Frey sensitivity) was performed using a calibrated set of von Frey filaments (Stoelting, Wood Dale, IL)56. Before the von Frey test, we allowed animals to adapt to the environment, including an elevated mesh platform for 15 min. The set of von Frey filaments was used to poke from below to the hind paw to calculate the 50% force withdrawal threshold using an iterative approach. The tests were performed in a blind manner that the investigator is not aware of the identification of animals as well as the study groups.
Experimental design and statistical analyses
The sample size for each experiment was determined based on our previous experiences. All the data were expressed as mean ± s.d., as indicated in the figure legends. Statistical analyses were completed with Prism GraphPad. Unpaired Student’s t test (for two groups), one-way ANOVA (for multiple groups) and two-way ANOVA (for multiple groups and time points) were used followed by the Tukey−Kramer test. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Supplementary information
Acknowledgements
We would like to express our gratitude to Ms. Lily Yu, for her assistance on processing and staining histological samples, and Mr. Jeffrey Martinson, for his help on flow cytometry. This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health Grants R01AR054465 and R01AR070222 to D.C. and the Rush 2015 Schweppe/Armour bequest Pilot Project to L.Z. G.X. was partially supported by NSFC grant 81630066.
Author contributions
J.H. generated miR-204 and miR-211 floxed mice, designed the research and performed experiments, analyzed data and wrote the manuscript. L.Z. designed and performed experiments, analyzed data and revised the manuscript. Y.F. and L.L. performed mouse surgery and intraarticular injection. G.X. and P.X.M. provided expertise and feedback. D.C. designed the project, analyzed the results and revised the manuscript.
Data availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available within the article and its Supplementary Information files or from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Peer review information: Nature Communications thanks John Rossi, Hiroshi Asahara and other anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
These authors contributed equally: Jian Huang, Lan Zhao.
Supplementary information
Supplementary Information accompanies this paper at 10.1038/s41467-019-10753-5.
References
- 1.Hunter DJ, Schofield D, Callander E. The individual and socioeconomic impact of osteoarthritis. Nat. Rev. Rheuma. 2014;10:437–441. doi: 10.1038/nrrheum.2014.44. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Lawrence RC, et al. Estimates of the prevalence of arthritis and other rheumatic conditions in the United States. Part II. Arthritis Rheum. 2008;58:26–35. doi: 10.1002/art.23176. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Goldring SR, Goldring MB. Changes in the osteochondral unit during osteoarthritis: structure, function and cartilage-bone crosstalk. Nat. Rev. Rheuma. 2016;12:632–644. doi: 10.1038/nrrheum.2016.148. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Loeser RF, Goldring SR, Scanzello CR, Goldring MB. Osteoarthritis: a disease of the joint as an organ. Arthritis Rheum. 2012;64:1697–1707. doi: 10.1002/art.34453. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Chevalier X, Eymard F, Richette P. Biologic agents in osteoarthritis: hopes and disappointments. Nat. Rev. Rheuma. 2013;9:400–410. doi: 10.1038/nrrheum.2013.44. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Huang J, Zhao L, Chen D. Growth factor signalling in osteoarthritis. Growth Factors. 2018;36:187–195. doi: 10.1080/08977194.2018.1548444. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Jiang Y, Tuan RS. Origin and function of cartilage stem/progenitor cells in osteoarthritis. Nat. Rev. Rheuma. 2015;11:206–212. doi: 10.1038/nrrheum.2014.200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.van der Kraan PM, van den Berg WB. Osteophytes: relevance and biology. Osteoarthr. Cartil. 2007;15:237–244. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2006.11.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Asahara H. Current status and strategy of microRNA research for cartilage development and osteoarthritis pathogenesis. J. Bone Metab. 2016;23:121–127. doi: 10.11005/jbm.2016.23.3.121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Swingler TE, et al. The expression and function of microRNAs in chondrogenesis and osteoarthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2012;64:1909–1919. doi: 10.1002/art.34314. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Huang J, Zhao L, Xing L, Chen D. MicroRNA-204 regulates Runx2 protein expression and mesenchymal progenitor cell differentiation. Stem Cells. 2010;28:357–364. doi: 10.1002/stem.288. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Xu G, Chen J, Jing G, Shalev A. Thioredoxin-interacting protein regulates insulin transcription through microRNA-204. Nat. Med. 2013;19:1141–1146. doi: 10.1038/nm.3287. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Vikram A, et al. Vascular microRNA-204 is remotely governed by the microbiome and impairs endothelium-dependent vasorelaxation by downregulating Sirtuin1. Nat. Commun. 2016;7:12565. doi: 10.1038/ncomms12565. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Conte I, et al. MiR-204 is responsible for inherited retinal dystrophy associated with ocular coloboma. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2015;112:E3236–E3245. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1401464112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Courboulin A, et al. Role for miR-204 in human pulmonary arterial hypertension. J. Exp. Med. 2011;208:535–548. doi: 10.1084/jem.20101812. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Levy C, et al. Intronic miR-211 assumes the tumor suppressive function of its host gene in melanoma. Mol. Cell. 2010;40:841–849. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2010.11.020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Schwenk F, Baron U, Rajewsky K. A cre-transgenic mouse strain for the ubiquitous deletion of loxP-flanked gene segments including deletion in germ cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 1995;23:5080–5081. doi: 10.1093/nar/23.24.5080. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Sampson ER, et al. Establishment of an index with increased sensitivity for assessing murine arthritis. J. Orthop. Res. 2011;29:1145–1151. doi: 10.1002/jor.21368. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Logan M, et al. Expression of Cre Recombinase in the developing mouse limb bud driven by a Prxl enhancer. Genesis. 2002;33:77–80. doi: 10.1002/gene.10092. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Yue R, Zhou BO, Shimada IS, Zhao Z, Morrison SJ. Leptin receptor promotes adipogenesis and reduces osteogenesis by regulating mesenchymal stromal cells in adult bone marrow. Cell Stem Cell. 2016;18:782–796. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2016.02.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Pritzker KP, et al. Osteoarthritis cartilage histopathology: grading and staging. Osteoarthr. Cartil. 2006;14:13–29. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2005.07.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Zhao L, et al. Tumor necrosis factor inhibits mesenchymal stem cell differentiation into osteoblasts via the ubiquitin E3 ligase Wwp1. Stem Cells. 2011;29:1601–1610. doi: 10.1002/stem.703. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Chi SW, Zang JB, Mele A, Darnell RB. Argonaute HITS-CLIP decodes microRNA-mRNA interaction maps. Nature. 2009;460:479–486. doi: 10.1038/nature08170. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Czech B, Hannon GJ. Small RNA sorting: matchmaking for Argonautes. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2011;12:19–31. doi: 10.1038/nrg2916. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Lin AC, et al. Modulating hedgehog signaling can attenuate the severity of osteoarthritis. Nat. Med. 2009;15:1421–1425. doi: 10.1038/nm.2055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Wang X, et al. Regulation of MMP-13 expression by RUNX2 and FGF2 in osteoarthritic cartilage. Osteoarthr. Cartil. 2004;12:963–973. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2004.08.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Kamekura S, et al. Contribution of runt-related transcription factor 2 to the pathogenesis of osteoarthritis in mice after induction of knee joint instability. Arthritis Rheum. 2006;54:2462–2470. doi: 10.1002/art.22041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Liao L, et al. Deletion of Runx2 in articular chondrocytes decelerates the progression of DMM-induced osteoarthritis in adult mice. Sci. Rep. 2017;7:2371. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-02490-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Sakaguchi Y, Sekiya I, Yagishita K, Muneta T. Comparison of human stem cells derived from various mesenchymal tissues: superiority of synovium as a cell source. Arthritis Rheum. 2005;52:2521–2529. doi: 10.1002/art.21212. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Manning BD, Cantley LC. AKT/PKB signaling: navigating downstream. Cell. 2007;129:1261–1274. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.06.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Engelman JA, Luo J, Cantley LC. The evolution of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinases as regulators of growth and metabolism. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2006;7:606–619. doi: 10.1038/nrg1879. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Hasuwa H, Ueda J, Ikawa M, Okabe M. miR-200b and miR-429 function in mouse ovulation and are essential for female fertility. Science. 2013;341:71–73. doi: 10.1126/science.1237999. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Zhao L, et al. Exploration of CRISPR/Cas9-based gene editing as therapy for osteoarthritis. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2019;78:676–682. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2018-214724. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Khoury M, et al. Adeno-associated virus type 5-mediated intraarticular administration of tumor necrosis factor small interfering RNA improves collagen-induced arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2010;62:765–770. doi: 10.1002/art.27302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Miyaki S, et al. MicroRNA-140 plays dual roles in both cartilage development and homeostasis. Genes Dev. 2010;24:1173–1185. doi: 10.1101/gad.1915510. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Yang S, et al. Hypoxia-inducible factor-2alpha is a catabolic regulator of osteoarthritic cartilage destruction. Nat. Med. 2010;16:687–693. doi: 10.1038/nm.2153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Saito T, et al. Transcriptional regulation of endochondral ossification by HIF-2alpha during skeletal growth and osteoarthritis development. Nat. Med. 2010;16:678–686. doi: 10.1038/nm.2146. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Zhang M, et al. Induced superficial chondrocyte death reduces catabolic cartilage damage in murine posttraumatic osteoarthritis. J. Clin. Invest. 2016;126:2893–2902. doi: 10.1172/JCI83676. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Shen J, et al. Deletion of the transforming growth factor beta receptor type II gene in articular chondrocytes leads to a progressive osteoarthritis-like phenotype in mice. Arthritis Rheum. 2013;65:3107–3119. doi: 10.1002/art.38122. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Rockel JS, et al. Hedgehog inhibits beta-catenin activity in synovial joint development and osteoarthritis. J. Clin. Invest. 2016;126:1649–1663. doi: 10.1172/JCI80205. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Yang X, et al. TGF-beta/Smad3 signals repress chondrocyte hypertrophic differentiation and are required for maintaining articular cartilage. J. Cell Biol. 2001;153:35–46. doi: 10.1083/jcb.153.1.35. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.De Bari C, Dell’Accio F, Tylzanowski P, Luyten FP. Multipotent mesenchymal stem cells from adult human synovial membrane. Arthritis Rheum. 2001;44:1928–1942. doi: 10.1002/1529-0131(200108)44:8<1928::AID-ART331>3.0.CO;2-P. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Segawa Y, et al. Mesenchymal stem cells derived from synovium, meniscus, anterior cruciate ligament, and articular chondrocytes share similar gene expression profiles. J. Orthop. Res. 2009;27:435–441. doi: 10.1002/jor.20786. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Alsalameh S, Amin R, Gemba T, Lotz M. Identification of mesenchymal progenitor cells in normal and osteoarthritic human articular cartilage. Arthritis Rheum. 2004;50:1522–1532. doi: 10.1002/art.20269. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Bernardo ME, Fibbe WE. Mesenchymal stromal cells: sensors and switchers of inflammation. Cell Stem Cell. 2013;13:392–402. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2013.09.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Mendicino M, Bailey AM, Wonnacott K, Puri RK, Bauer SR. MSC-based product characterization for clinical trials: an FDA perspective. Cell Stem Cell. 2014;14:141–145. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2014.01.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Trounson A, McDonald C. Stem cell therapies in clinical trials: progress and challenges. Cell Stem Cell. 2015;17:11–22. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2015.06.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Liu P, Jenkins NA, Copeland NG. A highly efficient recombineering-based method for generating conditional knockout mutations. Genome Res. 2003;13:476–484. doi: 10.1101/gr.749203. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Chan W, et al. A recombineering based approach for high-throughput conditional knockout targeting vector construction. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007;35:e64. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkm163. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Farley FW, Soriano P, Steffen LS, Dymecki SM. Widespread recombinase expression using FLPeR (flipper) mice. Genesis. 2000;28:106–110. doi: 10.1002/1526-968X(200011/12)28:3/4<106::AID-GENE30>3.0.CO;2-T. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Futami I, et al. Isolation and characterization of multipotential mesenchymal cells from the mouse synovium. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e45517. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0045517. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Gosset M, Berenbaum F, Thirion S, Jacques C. Primary culture and phenotyping of murine chondrocytes. Nat. Protoc. 2008;3:1253–1260. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2008.95. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Zhao L, et al. Smurf1 inhibits mesenchymal stem cell proliferation and differentiation into osteoblasts through JunB degradation. J. Bone Min. Res. 2010;25:1246–1256. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.28. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Helwak A, Tollervey D. Mapping the miRNA interactome by cross-linking ligation and sequencing of hybrids (CLASH) Nat. Protoc. 2014;9:711–728. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2014.043. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Glasson SS, Chambers MG, Van Den Berg WB, Little CB. The OARSI histopathology initiative—recommendations for histological assessments of osteoarthritis in the mouse. Osteoarthr. Cartil. 2010;18(Suppl 3):S17–S23. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2010.05.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Chaplan SR, Bach FW, Pogrel JW, Chung JM, Yaksh TL. Quantitative assessment of tactile allodynia in the rat paw. J. Neurosci. Methods. 1994;53:55–63. doi: 10.1016/0165-0270(94)90144-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The data that support the findings of this study are available within the article and its Supplementary Information files or from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.