Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Jul 20.
Published in final edited form as: Int J Pharm. 2019 Jun 8;566:520–531. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2019.06.021

Preparation and evaluation of cefuroxime axetil gastro-retentive floating drug delivery system via hot melt extrusion technology

Rahul Lalge a, Priyanka Thipsay a, Vijay kumar Shankar a, Abhijeet Maurya a, Manjeet Pimparade a, Suresh Bandari a, Feng Zhang b, S Narasimha Murthy a,d, Michael A Repka a,c,*
PMCID: PMC6599566  NIHMSID: NIHMS1531889  PMID: 31185262

Abstract

Cefuroxime Axetil (CA) is a poorly soluble, broad spectrum antibiotic which undergoes enzymatic degradation in gastrointestinal tract. The objective of the present study was to develop lipid-based gastro-retentive floating drug delivery systems containing CA using hot-melt extrusion (HME) to improve absorption. Selected formulations of CA and lipids were extruded using a twin screw hot-melt extruder. Milled extrudates were characterized for dissolution, floating strength, and micromeritic properties. Solid-state characterization was performed using differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy, and hot-stage microscopy. In vitro characterization demonstrated that the formulations exhibited a sustained drug release profile for 12 h. All formulations showed desired floating and flow properties. Solid-state characterization revealed no phase separation and no chemical interactions between the drug and excipients. Based on in vitro study results, an optimized formulation (F8) was further evaluated for in vivo performance. Oral bioavailability (Cmax and AUC0–24h) of F8 was significantly higher than that of pure CA. This study describes the use of lipid-based gastro-retentive floating drug delivery systems to achieve desired sustained release profile for more complete dissolution which could potentially reduce enzymatic degradation. This study also highlights the effectiveness of HME technology to improve dissolution and bioavailability.

Keywords: Cefuroxime axetil, Sustained release, Floating drug delivery systems, Pharmacokinetic study, Lipids, Enzymatic degradation

1. INTRODUCTION

Cefuroxime Axetil (CA) is an acetoxyethyl ester ‘prodrug’ of cefuroxime, a broad-spectrum cephalosporin antibiotic. Cefuroxime was the first commercially available second-generation oral antibiotic to be widely used in therapy (Adams et al., 1985; Brambilla et al., 1992; Fabre et al., 1994). It exerts broad-spectrum antibacterial activity against methicillin-sensitive staphylococci, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, Moraxella (Branhamella) catarrhalis, and group A β-hemolytic streptococci (Perry and Brogden, 1996). It also shows broad activity against some β-lactamase gram-positive respiratory pathogens. The primary mechanisms of action of cefuroxime are inhibition of transpeptidation and peptidoglycan layer synthesis of the bacterial cell wall (Fisher et al., 2005; Gordon et al., 2000).

Since cefuroxime is not well absorbed when administered orally, it is mainly administered parenterally in a salt form (Dhumal et al., 2008). Due to its short elimination half-life (1.2–1.6 h), the necessity for frequent dosing restricts patient compliance (Dhumal et al., 2006; Sommers et al., 1984). Addition of a 1-acetoxyethyl ester group to the cefuroxime molecule results in a prodrug form (CA), that enhances its oral absorption due to increased lipophilicity of the molecule (logP~0.55). CA also exhibits gastric stability due to its higher pKa value (Oszczapowicz et al., 1995). However, upon oral administration, CA is mainly absorbed in the proximal region of the GI tract and undergoes rapid hydrolysis to form cefuroxime in the presence of non-specific esterase enzymes in the intestinal mucosa and blood (Figure 1A) (Sommers et al., 1984). Although the 1-acetoxyethyl ester group of CA increases lipophilicity of cefuroxime, de-esterification due to esterase enzymes prior to absorption in the intestinal fluids leads to low permeation across the intestinal mucosa (Barrett et al., 1997; Harding et al., 1984; Leder and Carson, 1997). CA is poorly soluble, and exhibits greater bioavailability in the presence of lipid-rich foods due to lower specificity of esterase enzymes toward CA in the intestine (Finn et al., 1987; Williams and Harding, 1984).

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

(A) Enzymatic degradation of cefuroxime axetil to cefuroxime (B) Schematic of lipid-based floating drug delivery system containing cefuroxime axetil

Amorphous solid dispersion has been widely used and is a promising approach for solubility enhancement of poorly water-soluble drugs (Taylor and Zhang, 2016). The higher internal energy of amorphous materials compared to crystalline materials results in greater thermodynamic properties and a subsequent increase in solubility and bioavailability (Huttenrauch, 1978). As previously reported, absorption of CA is higher in the proximal region of the intestine than other parts of the GI tract (Rouge et al., 1996). Therefore, it is important to temporally control dissolution of CA to facilitate absorption prior to passing through the small intestine. A gastro-retentive drug delivery system can provide better control over complete and timed dissolution of active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) (Baumgartner et al., 2000; Deshpande et al., 1997). Moreover, due to continuous transport of released drug molecules toward the intestines, supersaturation in the microenvironment of the dosage form is never achieved, which further prevents the ability of amorphous drug molecules to undergo recrystallization in solution. Gradual release of these drug molecules from their dosage forms ensures their availability at the site of absorption (Streubel et al., 2006).

Carriers such as glyceride lipids and polyethylene glycol – lipid conjugates have been used in self-emulsifying and self-microemulsifying drug delivery systems to improve the dissolution of poorly water-soluble drugs (Charkoftaki et al., 2011; Shimpi et al., 2005). In addition, lipid-based carriers can facilitate permeation of intact CA molecules across the intestinal mucosa by potentially decreasing the enzymatic activity and preventing degradation of the prodrug CA prior to its absorption (Figure 1B) (Zaro, 2014). Glyceride-conjugated lipids are available with varying degrees of hydrophobicity and melt at low temperatures to aid in thermal processing, making them ideal carriers for controlled drug delivery (Aiṅaoui and Vergnaud, 1998). Siripuram et al. demonstrated the sustained release properties of Gelucire® 43/01 (Siripuram et al., 2010).

Based on the chemical properties of the prodrug CA, a lipid-based gastro-retentive drug delivery system may allow for greater temporal control of drug release to potentially minimize the enzymatic degradation and maximize its absorption. Gastro-retentive drug delivery systems can be categorized as floating, mucoadhesive, high density, and expandable. Floating drug delivery systems have been extensively studied. Gastro-retentive floating drug delivery systems can be used to deliver drug molecules locally over prolonged periods of time, resulting in improved bioavailability and therapeutic efficacy (Deshpande et al., 1996). Although floating drug delivery systems can be affected by regular gastric emptying, stomach movements, meals, and posture, potentially resulting in variable absorption, they do not adversely affect stomach movements or function. Hence, floating drug delivery provides the safest approach to achieve maximal bioavailability (Fell, 1996).

HME is a solvent-free technique for preparation of amorphous solid dispersions (Repka et al., 2008). HME is also an easily scalable, continuous, and efficient process specifically beneficial for processing of APIs such as CA which exhibit poor flow properties and mixing issues during conventional processing (Repka et al., 2007).

In the present study, a novel lipid-based gastro-retentive floating drug delivery system containing CA was prepared using HME technology. Gelucire® 43/01, a hard-fat mixture of glycerides and PEG esters was chosen as the floating lipid due to its highly hydrophobic nature and low melting point, which aids in the extrusion process. Kolliphor® TPGS and Gelucire® 44/14 were chosen based on their amphiphilic non-ionic surfactant-like properties and they both melt below 45 °C, which is an added advantage for extrusion processing. Optimized mixtures of hydrophobic lipids and surfactants, in combination can help the drug molecules to dissolve in a more controlled manner. The prepared drug delivery system has the potential to improve absorption and bioavailability of CA through sustained release of CA from the lipid matrix and by potentially preventing enzymatic degradation due to competitive lipolysis of lipids caused by esterase enzymes.

2. MATERIALS AND METHODS

2.1. Materials

CA was purchased from Corned Chemicals Ltd. (Vadodara, Gujarat, India). Cefuroxime was purchased from AK Scientific Inc. (CA, USA). Kolliphor® TPGS USP/NF was kindly gifted by BASF Corporation (Florham Park, NJ, USA). Lipids, Gelucire® 43/01 pellets USP/NF, and Gelucire® 44/14 USP/NF, were generous gift samples provided by Gattefosse Corporation (Saint-Priest, Cedex, France). Other analytical grade solvents and chemicals were purchased from Fisher Scientific (Pittsburgh, PA, USA).

2.2. Solubility studies

UV-Visible spectrophotometry (GENESYS 6 UV- Vis spectrophotometer, Thermo Scientific, Madison WI, US) was used to estimate the concentration of CA at a wavelength of 278 nm (United States Pharmacopeial Convention, 2000). The standard curve was linear across the range of 0.8 to 16 μg/mL (R2 = 0.999).

pH-dependent saturation solubility measurements of CA were performed by adding a known excess amount of CA to 1 mL of 0.1 N HCl (pH 1.2), 0.1 M phosphate buffer (pH 6.8), or water. Samples were agitated using a mechanical shaker at 50 rpm (37 ± 0.5 °C) for 24 h. Samples were centrifuged at 10,000 rpm for 5 min and the supernatant was filtered, then diluted prior to UV-Vis spectrophotometric analysis at 278 nm. Phase solubility studies were performed for Kolliphor® TPGS and Gelucire® 44/14 at concentrations of 2–10% w/v in water by adding a known excess amount of CA. Samples were agitated in a water bath (37 ± 0.5 °C) for 48 h, then centrifuged at 10,000 rpm for 5 min. The supernatant was diluted and analyzed by UV-Vis spectrophotometry (Mader and Higuchi, 1970).

2.3. Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC)

DSC was used to assess the polymorphic and thermal properties of the API and excipients. Pure components, physical mixtures, and formulations were investigated using a TA Instruments DSC equipped with TRIOS software. Samples were prepared by weighing 5–8 mg of each sample into non-hermetic aluminum pans. The pans were crimped and placed onto the DSC system.

All samples except the pure API were stabilized by equilibrating at 10 °C followed by heating from 10 °C to 100 °C at a ramp rate of 10 °C/min with an inert nitrogen cell purge flow of 50 mL/min. Pure API was equilibrated at a temperature of 20 °C followed by heating from 20 °C to 150 °C at a ramp rate of 20 °C/min. All the thermal events were analyzed using the obtained thermograms.

2.4. Extrusion processing

Gelucire® 43/01, Kolliphor® TPGS and Gelucire® 44/14 were milled separately with dry ice in a grinder. Powdered dry ice was used to harden these waxy materials to aid the milling process. Milled samples were passed through a USP #40 mesh sieve after complete evaporation of dry ice from the mixture. CA was sieved separately through a USP #25 mesh to eliminate lumps and aggregates. Fifty-gram mixtures of each formulation were prepared by physically mixing to obtain homogeneous mixtures.

The system used to obtain lipid extrudates was composed of a twin screw extruder (Process 11™, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Odessa, TX, USA) without a die insert, and with a chiller and a feeder. A standard screw configuration was used for this study (Figure 2). The temperatures of zones 2 and 3 were kept at 20 °C while feeding was done through zone 3. Zones 7 and 8 were set at 40 °C, and the remaining zones were kept at 50 °C. Screw speed and feed rate were maintained at 200 rpm and 3 g/min, respectively.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Standard screw configuration used to prepare the extrudates

To obtain thermal equilibrium prior to the extrusion process, the system was kept at pre-defined temperatures for 10 min. After discarding the initial 5 g, extrudates were collected while maintaining the system at a steady state. The obtained extrudates were milled using a comminuting Fitz mill (Fitzpatrick, Model “L1A”, Elmhurst, IL, USA) and sieved through a mesh. The milled granules were stored in a desiccator at 20–25 °C for further analysis and processing.

2.5. Assay and drug content uniformity

The milled granules were accurately weighed, extracted in methylene chloride, then diluted and analyzed by UV-Visible spectrophotometry. The extrudates were evaluated for content uniformity by selecting five different samples. Samples were powdered and dissolved in methylene chloride, sonicated for 10 min, then centrifuged. The supernatant was diluted and analyzed for CA content using a UV-Visible spectrophotometer (Shimpi et al., 2004).

2.6. In vitro drug release

Size 00 hard gelatin capsules were filled with floating granules equivalent to 125 mg of CA. Dissolution was performed in 900 mL of pH 1.2 simulated gastric fluid (SGF, enzyme-free) using a USP dissolution apparatus II (Hanson SR8™; Hanson Research) maintained at 37 ± 0.5 °C with a paddle rotation speed of 50 rpm. At predetermined time intervals, 2 mL of dissolution medium was removed with replacement of an equal volume of fresh dissolution medium. Samples were filtered through 0.2-μm PTFE membrane filters (Whatman, Inc., Haverhill, MA, USA), diluted with dissolution medium, and analyzed using a UV-Visible spectrophotometer (Bomma and Veerabrahma, 2013; United States Pharmacopeial Convention, 2000).

2.7. Density of floating granules

To determine tap density, approximately 1–2.5 g of each formulation was accurately weighed (m) and transferred to a 10-mL glass cylinder. Tap density was determined by tapping the filled cylinder carefully by hand approximately 50 times until a constant volume was achieved (v). The equation (1) was used to calculate the tap density, where m was the mass of the granules and V was the volume of cylinder used.

Dtap=mV Equation (1)

The true density of the floating granules was evaluated using a gas pycnometer (AccuPyc II 1340, Micromeritics, Norcross GA, USA) with nitrogen gas. Measurements were repeated in triplicate and the data were processed using AccuPyc II software. Carr’s Index and Hausner’s ratio were also calculated per the standard procedure (Wells and Aulton, 2007).

2.8. Floating strength determination

Timmermans and Moës first reported the ‘resultant weight’ measurement method to determine the floating strength of a substance in a liquid medium (Timmermans and Moës, 1990). A resultant weight measurement apparatus was assembled, which measured the difference between the resultant weights corresponding to the floating force based on the lever principle. Through a lever, a cone-suspended string was attached to the counterpoise weight, which was placed on a sensitive electronic balance. In a glass beaker, 500 mg of floating granules in capsules were stirred at 50 rpm in 200 mL of 0.1 N HCl medium maintained at 37 ± 0.5 °C. At predetermined time intervals, the beaker was carefully placed into the assembly on a holder ensuring that it was raised to a height where all granules were submerged under the cone. After the cone was steady, the difference between initial and final values was recorded to calculate the specific floating force of the granules. The beaker was kept stirring between measurements (Figure 3).

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Experimental assembly for measurement of floating strength of the granules (A) Before and (B) After immersing in 0.1 N HCl

2.9. In vitro floating ability

The in vitro floating ability of the granules was assessed using a USP II apparatus in 900 mL of 0.1 N HCl. Stir speed was maintained at 50 rpm and temperature was maintained at 37 ± 0.5 °C. The granules were placed into the medium and floating lag times and total floating times were measured visually (Iannuccelli et al., 1998).

2.10. Drug-excipient compatibility

Infrared spectra of pure CA, excipients, and extruded granules were collected using a Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectrometer (Agilent Technologies, Cary 660; Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA) fitted with a MIRacle ATR sampling accessory (Pike Technologies, Madison WI, USA). The bench top ATR was equipped with a single bounce diamond-coated ZnSe internal reflection element.

2.11. Hot-stage polarized microscopy

An optical microscope (Agilent Cary 620 IR; Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA) was equipped with an electronically-controlled hot-stage (T95 LinkPad and FTIR 600; Linkam, Tadworth, UK). Photographs were collected without using crossed polarizers to determine thermal behavior and homogeneity. The samples were heated to 200 °C at a ramp rate of 10 ± 0.1 °C/min and observed visually.

2.12. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM)

Samples were placed on aluminum stubs held with a black carbon adhesive film and coated using by a Hummer® 6.2 sputtering system (Anatech Ltd., Battlecreek MI, USA) in a high-vacuum evaporator. The surface topography of each sample was analyzed using a scanning electron microscope operated across an accelerating voltage range of 1.0 kV to 5.0 kV (JEOL JSM-5600; JEOL, Inc., Peabody MA, USA).

2.13. X-ray powder diffraction (XRPD)

XRPD was performed using a Bruker D8-Advance (Bruker, Billerica MA, USA) with a Cu-source and θ−2θ diffractometer equipped with a Lynx-eye Position Sensitive Detector. The generator was subjected to a voltage of 40 kV and a current of 30 mA. Samples were dispersed on a low background Si sample holder and compacted gently with the back of a metal spatula. Scans ran from 5° to 40° 2θ with a 0.05 step size at 3 seconds per step.

2.14. High performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) analysis

A simple and precise reversed phase HPLC - UV system (Waters Corporation, Milford, MA) was utilized for analysis of cefuroxime in plasma. A 250 mm x 4.6 mm internal diameter (ID) Waters XBridge™ C18 chromatographic column with 5 μm particle size was used for separation. The mobile phase consisted of potassium phosphate monobasic buffer (0.01 M) and methanol at a 55:45 (v/v) ratio. The mobile phase was maintained at a constant flow of 1 mL/min, and samples were analyzed using a photodiode array (PDA) detector at a wavelength of 278 nm (Dhumal et al., 2006). The retention time of cefuroxime was 4.2 min. The method was linear across the concentration range of 10 to 2000 ng/mL of cefuroxime with a correlation coefficient of 0.999.

To plot the standard curve in rat plasma, blood was collected from the jugular vein of rats through a cannula into heparinized microcentrifuge tubes. Samples were centrifuged for 10 min at 8,000 rpm at 4° C and the supernatant (plasma) was collected for further analysis. Plasma (80 μL) was mixed with 20 μL of previously prepared drug solutions in methanol and water at an 80 : 20 ratio (concentrations 10 – 2000 ng/mL). After 2 min of vortex mixing, 4 mL of ethyl acetate was added, and samples were centrifuged at 3,000 rpm for 5 min. The supernatant layer was isolated and dried overnight at room temperature to completely evaporate ethyl acetate. The dried samples were diluted with 1 mL of 80 : 20 (methanol and water) and injection volume of 20 μL was injected into HPLC system for analysis (Dhumal et al., 2009). The standard curve in rat plasma was linear across the range of 10–2000 ng/mL.

2.15. In vivo pharmacokinetic study

Twelve male Sprague-Dawley jugular vein-cannulated rats weighing 250 ± 20 g were used in this study after an acclimatization period of one week. All rat experiments were conducted per an Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) protocol at the University of Mississippi (Protocol number: 16–017).

Animals were divided into three groups with four animals in each group (optimized formulation, pure CA, and the marketed formulation). A dose of 45 mg/kg body weight was administered by oral gavage. Blood (250 μL) was withdrawn from the jugular veins of the rats and transferred into heparinized microcentrifuge tubes at 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 10, 12, and 24 h after dosing. After collection, plasma was isolated for further analysis. All plasma samples were treated in the same manner as samples previously prepared for plotting the calibration curve. Samples were injected onto an HPLC system for analysis. Pharmacokinetic parameters of cefuroxime such as area under curve (AUC), peak plasma concentration (Cmax), and peak plasma concentration time (Tmax) were calculated using Phoenix® WinNonlin™ 6.4 (Certara®, Princeton, NJ, USA) software. Statistical analyses were performed using an unpaired Student’s t-test. A p-value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant (Dhumal et al., 2009).

3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

3.1. Solubility

A solubility study demonstrated that CA exhibited higher (p<0.05) solubility (0.84 ± 0.03 mg/mL) in pH 1.2 (0.1 N) HCl medium than in water (0.32± 0.03 mg/mL). Solubility was higher (2.49 ± 0.14 mg/mL) in pH 6.8 phosphate buffered saline. Higher solubility in gastric pH medium than that in water suggested that drug release would be enhanced in the gastric environment. CA showed a nearly 3-fold higher phase solubility in Kolliphor® TPGS (6.87± 0.12 mg/mL) than in Gelucire® 44/14 (2.17± 0.01 mg/mL) in 10% w/v aqueous solutions. CA showed a linear increase in phase solubility as amounts of both lipids increased. Kolliphor® TPGS and Gelucire® 44/14 are amphiphilic surfactants used to enhance water penetration into the core of the drug-lipid matrix to promote drug solubilization. Based on solubility studies, both Kolliphor® TPGS and Gelucire® 44/14 were chosen for further evaluation.

3.2. Thermal properties

Pure CA and all excipients were assessed for their respective melting temperatures and crystallinity. Pure CA had an endothermic peak near 75–80 °C, corresponding to its glass transition temperature (Tg), confirming its amorphous nature. Melting points (Tm) of Gelucire® 43/01, Gelucire® 44/14, and Kolliphor® TPGS were observed to be below 45 °C (Table 1).

Table 1.

Thermal properties of Cefuroxime Axetil and formulation components

Cefiiroxime Axetil (CA) Tg = 77.4 °C
Gelucire® 43/01 Tm = 42.5 °C
Gelucire® 44/14 Tm = 42.7 °C
Kolliphor® TPGS Tm = 37 °C

3.3. Experimental parameters

A preliminary study was performed to determine feasibility of extrusion processing of lipids to optimize extrusion conditions. Standard screw configuration was finalized on Process 11™, a 11-mm extruder from Thermo Fisher Scientific (Odessa, TX, USA), which allowed for complete dispersive mixing of CA and excipients due to large mixing zones in the screw configuration. Critical process parameters including barrel temperature, feeding zone, and screw speed were assessed. At high temperatures and higher L/D ratios, which resulted in a longer residence time, extrudates were produced in a clear liquid state in a phase-separated form without traces of powdered API. Hence, simultaneous selection of feeding zone and screw speed played an important role in obtaining the desired extrudates from the extrusion process. Therefore, feeding was done through zone 3 to reduce the residence time, and temperatures of mixing zones were set to 50 °C, feeding zones were kept at 20 °C, and discharge zones were kept at 40 °C to produce uniform extrudates. Screw speed was also optimized at 200 rpm to decrease the mean residence time of the extrusion process. Torque of the system was stabilized between 3–5% during the entire process.

Finally, rapid exposure to a temperature of 50 °C in mixing zones, higher than the melting temperatures of lipids (which ranged between 37°C – 45 °C), followed by rapid cooling at room temperature, resulted in solidified extrudates which maintained their structures for prolonged periods. CA was observed to be sticking to the barrel and mixing zones when extrusions were carried out at temperatures above Tg of CA (>78 °C). The highly sticky nature of the pure drug above its glass transition temperature resulted in phase separation of the drug and lipids. Therefore, the temperature of the barrel should not be too close to the Tg, as solid CA tends to have better flowability than its melted form. It is also advisable to keep the operational temperatures of the barrel and mixing zones just above the melting points of the lipids to obtain highly uniform extrudates.

3.4. Preparation of floating granules

In this study, Gelucire® 43/01, Kolliphor® TPGS and Gelucire® 44/14 were used to disperse the drug molecules in a lipid-based matrix in a stable amorphous form. Gelucire® 43/01, a hydrophobic lipid, was able to slow release of the drug embedded in the lipid matrix. The hydrophobic nature of Gelucire® 43/01 pellets allowed them to float in 0.1 N HCl for more than 24 h, making these pellets the right choice to confer floating properties to the formulation.

Eight ratios of drug, hydrophobic lipid, and surfactants were extruded and further characterized (Table 2). All extrudates showed good milling properties when milled with dry ice and formed granules of uniform size and shape upon cryomilling. Granules were able to float in SGF for up to 12 h and sustained drug release from the lipid matrices over a period of 12 h. The average drug content of all the formulations was 500.6 ± 27.1 mg which confirmed that the drug was uniformly mixed with the lipids during the extrusion processing. This was further supported by content uniformity results, which showed a drug content of 99 ± 1.79%. The Acceptance Value (AV) for uniformity was calculated using equation (2) as per USP <905>, where M and X¯ denote reference and mean value of contents respectively, which are equal in this case. Whereas k is an acceptability constant and s is the standard deviation, which were calculated to be 2.4 and 1.8 respectively. The equation yielded a satisfactory AV value of 4.3 for content uniformity of all formulations.

AV=|MX¯|+ks Equation (2)

Table 2.

Experimental formulation compositions of floating granules

Formulation Drug loading Gelucire® 43/01 Gelucire® 44/14 Kolliphor® TPGS
F1 60% 40% - -
F2 50% 50%
F3 50% 47.5% - 2.5%
F4 50% 45% - 5%
F5 40% 40% 20% -
F6 40% 40% - 20%
F7 30% 50% 20% -
F8 30% 50% - 20%

3.5. Micromeritic properties of floating granules

All formulations were evaluated for true, bulk, and tap densities. Carr’s Indices and Hausner’s ratios were calculated to estimate the flowability of the floating granules during processing. Micromeritic properties of CA showed that flowability was not within the recommended range for the extrusion process, but all formulations showed good flowability. Carr’s indices were between 6–12% and Hausner’s ratios were below 1.18 for all formulations, which indicated good flow properties of the granules (Figure 4). Addition of Gelucire® 43/01 significantly lowered granule density, imparting good flow properties, whereas pure drug formulated with hydrophilic lipids resulted into high density granules with average flow properties.

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

(A) True density, (B) Carr’s indices, and (C) Hausner’s ratios for formulations and pure drug (n=3), *P<0.05, F8 compared to other formulations ***P<0.05, Pure drug compared to other formulations

Surface characterization of the granules was performed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Non-porous and consistent smooth surfaces indicated the presence of lipids on the surfaces of the granules. Although granules were irregularly shaped, the presence of lipids on the surface suggests that the drug was uniformly mixed within the lipid carriers (Figure 5). Therefore, we concluded that the presence of both hydrophobic and hydrophilic lipids during the HME processing determined the distribution of CA within the extrudates.

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

Scanning electron microscope images of F1, F2, F5, and F8 formulations

3.6. In vitro drug release

Pure CA showed only 42% drug release after 12 h in SGF. CA drug particles formed a stiff clustered mass after being placed in the medium, which may have been due to the presence of gelation and aggregation caused by cohesion between drug molecules. Formulations extruded with only Gelucire® 43/01 significantly slowed drug release (p<0.05). This may have been due to low water permeation into the hydrophobic lipid matrix, which resulted in approximately 20% drug release in 12 h (Figure 6). Incremental addition of release enhancers improved drug release proportional to the amount of release enhancer included. However, release was higher in formulations that included Kolliphor® TPGS than those that included Gelucire® 44/14. This was supported by the higher solubilization capacity of Kolliphor® TPGS, as confirmed in the phase solubility study. Formulations that included Kolliphor® TPGS or Gelucire® 44/14 exhibited greater release with a lesser drug load (30%) than with a greater (40%) drug load (p<0.05) (Figure 6). This was attributed to higher hydrophilic lipid to drug ratio, which contributed to more complete dissolution of CA.

Figure 6.

Figure 6.

Drug release profiles of cefuroxime axetil from floating granules in pH 1.2 simulated gastric fluid (without enzymes) (n=3)

3.7. Floating strength of the granules

Floating strength of the granules was an important parameter to evaluate performance of granules and to optimize the formulation. Many factors can affect floating strength of formulations including gastric emptying time and pH of the stomach. Buoyancy kinetics of granules could be significantly altered in response to gastric churning movements and can affect the desired performance of the drug delivery system (Van Den Abeele et al., 2017). Floating strength should be high enough to be robust to these potential issues and allow for consistent performance of the delivery system. To address these issues, drug delivery systems involving both floating and muco-adhesive properties have been studied (Vo et al., 2017).

Granules of all formulations evaluated in this study floated immediately without any observed lag time in pH 1.2 SGF (without enzymes). Granules of most of the formulations floated for more than 8 h.

The specific floating strength of the granules did not vary significantly between formulations but followed specific patterns and decreased over time. The initial floating force ranged from 695 μN/g to 717 μN/g and decreased to 630 μN/g to 668 μN/g over a period of 12 h (Figure 7). The low floating force at time zero was likely due to added weight of the capsule shell, and as the capsule shell dissolved increased floating force was observed after one hour. Higher amounts of Gelucire® 43/01 contributed to better floating properties over a prolonged period, whereas drug loading and amount of surfactant inversely affected floating ability. Decreased floating strength over 12 h can be explained by water penetration into the lipid matrix, making the matrix less buoyant than the initial formulation. Based on specific floating strength values and in vitro drug release study, the formulation F8 was optimized for further studies, which could potentially float in the gastric fluid with higher floating strength and release the drug for prolonged period.

Figure 7.

Figure 7.

Specific floating strength profiles of each formulation (n=3)

3.8. Characterization of polymorphic forms and phase separation

3.8.1. DSC

Pure CA exhibited a phase transition band at around 78 °C, which corresponded to its glass transition temperature (Tg), signifying that the API was amorphous (Figure 8). The DSC thermograms for Gelucire® 43/01, Gelucire® 44/14, and Kolliphor® TPGS showed endothermie peaks at their corresponding melting points (Figure 8). Gelucire® 44/14 exhibited two endothermie peaks associated with structural and polymorphic variability because it is a multicomponent lipid system. This was attributed to the complex polymorphic profile of glyceride lipids (Otun et al., 2015). However, the thermogram of extruded granules showed endothermie peaks corresponding to polyglycolized glycerides, but no evidence of a glass transition (Tg) representative of CA. These changes in enthalpy were due to homogenous extrudates and the absence of multiple glass transition temperatures, which confirmed that there was no phase separation between CA and the lipid excipients. Therefore, DSC analysis was indicative of the presence of a homogenous distribution of CA in the lipid matrix.

Figure 8.

Figure 8.

Differential scanning calorimetry thermograms of CA, lipids, and the optimized formulation

3.8.2. XRPD Analysis

XRPD analysis was performed to characterize polymorphs of unprocessed and processed CA in each formulation. The broad and diffuse diffraction peak of pure CA indicated its amorphous nature. The diffraction patterns of optimized formulation F8 and the physical mixture showed high intensity characteristic peaks which were attributed to Kolliphor® TPGS, which is crystalline (Figure 9).

Figure 9.

Figure 9.

X-Ray Powder Diffraction patterns for pure CA, physical mixture, and optimized formulation F8

However, peak intensity was reduced in the diffractogram of formulation F8, confirming homogeneity of the extruded formulation. The large peaks in the diffractogram of the physical mixture were due to the pure crystalline form of Kolliphor® TPGS. Therefore, the chosen screw design provided high shear energy, sufficient to prepare a solid dispersion of CA. Hence, it was concluded that high shear mixing at ambient temperature imparts significant mixing of both API and excipients.

3.8.3. Hot-stage polarized microscopy

Homogeneity of CA was assessed using polarized light hot-stage microscopy. At room temperature, in the presence of polarized light, the irregularly shaped amorphous form of CA was clearly observed. Conversion of amorphous CA to its glassy form was observed as the temperature of the stage increased.

Optimized extrudates did not show any significant phase separation, even after reaching the melting points of both included lipids, indicating that CA was homogeneously distributed in the lipid matrix (Figure 10).

Figure 10.

Figure 10.

Hot stage micrographs of (A) Pure CA at room temperature; (B) Pure CA above its glass transition temperature;(C) Extrudates at 50 °C

3.9. Chemical interactions between the API and excipients (FTIR)

The objective behind studying the FTIR spectra of CA and excipients was to investigate any possible interactions between the drug and lipid carriers. CA showed two absorption bands corresponding to carbonyl groups at 1678 cm−1 and 1680 cm−1, which were assigned to amide and carbonyl group stretching (Figure 11).

Figure 11.

Figure 11.

FTIR Spectra of CA, Gelucire® 43/01, Kolliphor® TPGS and Formulation F8

For CA, the peak at 1760 cm−1 was assigned to for carbonyl group stretching in the acetate, and the absorption bands for NH and NH2 complex were seen from 3260 cm−1 to 3480 cm−1. All major peaks assigned to carbonyl stretching vibrations were present at lower intensity in formulation F8 as compared to the pure CA. This was indicative of a weak interaction between CA and the excipients. It is possible that the C=O group of CA formed hydrogen bonds with -OH groups of Gelucire lipids, which agreed with results from a previous study (Shimpi et al., 2005).

3.10. In vivo pharmacokinetic study

The Tmax of cefuroxime for groups administered pure CA and the marketed formulation was less than 2 h, as demonstrated by more rapid release than the group administered optimized floating formulation (F8), which had a Tmax of 8 h, indicating sustained drug release from the floating granules. Cmax of cefuroxime was significantly higher (p<0.05) for the optimized formulation (F8) than that of pure CA and the marketed formulation, indicating enhanced absorption of the drug from the optimized formulation (Figure 12).

Figure 12.

Figure 12.

Log of plasma cefuroxime concentration vs time curve of pure CA, marketed formulation, and formulation F8

The AUC0–24h of the optimized formulation F8 (15816 ng h/mL) was significantly higher (p<0.05) than that of pure CA (3184 ng h/mL) and the marketed formulation (8728 ng h/mL), indicating a 4-fold increase in bioavailability of cefuroxime compared to pure CA (Table 3). In addition, the higher half-life t1/2 (~ 23 h) of formulation F8 suggested sustained release of the drug from the optimized floating granules. Thus our in vivo pharmacokinetic study demonstrated that the optimized floating lipid granules potentially enhanced the bioavailability of cefuroxime.

Table 3.

Pharmacokinetic parameters of pure CA, marketed formulation, and optimized formulation F8 after a single oral dose of 20 mg/kg to rats

Parameter Pure CA Marketed Formulation Optimized Formulation F8
Cmax (ng/mL) 480.6±45.7 1227.3±293.8*,# 2382±108.9*,#
Tmax (h) 2 2 8*,#
AUC0–24h (ng h/mL) 3184±120.4 8728±1252.2*,# 15816±1556*,#
t½ (h) 6±0.8 10.1±1.4* 22.7±8.4*

Each value represents the mean ± S.D. (n = 4).

*

P < 0.05, compared to pure CA;

#

P < 0.05, compared to marketed formulation.

4. CONCLUSION

Lipid-based gastro-retentive floating granules loaded with amorphous cefuroxime axetil were successfully prepared using HME technology. The floating formulations were well-characterized, and effects of various factors on properties of the granules were investigated. The granules had excellent flow properties and floated for more than 8 h in SGF (without enzymes). The granules also provided for sustained drug release for up to 12 h, which will ensure controlled dissolution and absorption of the drug in the proximal part of the intestine. These results demonstrated improved processability of cefuroxime axetil in the presence of lipids using HME. HME allowed for preparation of a drug delivery system with desired characteristics that will allow for improved absorption of CA. Pharmacokinetic studies of floating granules, pure CA, and the marketed formulation in rats revealed that optimized formulation F8 is a promising formulation to improve oral bioavailability of cefuroxime through more complete dissolution of CA, longer residence time in the stomach, and potentially decreased enzymatic degradation due to presence of lipids. This lipid drug delivery system prepared via HME significantly improved performance of the drug in vitro and in vivo.

6. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

This study was supported bery Grant Number P20GM104932 from the National Institute of General Medical Sciences and the Biopharmaceutics-Clinical and Translational Core E of COBRE, a component of the National Institutes of Health.

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

5.

DECLARATION OF INTEREST

All the authors report no conflicts of interest.

REFERENCES

  1. Adams DH, Wood MJ, Farrell ID, Fox C, Ball AP, 1985. Oral cefuroxime axetil: clinical pharmacology and comparative dose studies in urinary tract infection. J.Antimicrob. Chemother 16, 359–366. 10.1093/jac/16.3.359 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Aiṅaoui A, Vergnaud JM, 1998. Modelling the plasma drug level with oral controlled release dosage forms with lipidic Gelucire. Int. J. Pharm 169, 155–162. [Google Scholar]
  3. Barrett MA, Lawrence MJ, Hutt AJ, Lansley AB, 1997. Stereoselective absorption and hydrolysis of cefuroxime axetil diastereomers using the Caco-2 cell monolayer model. Eur. J. Drug Metab. Pharmacokinet 22, 409–413. 10.1007/BF03190978 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Baumgartner S, Kristi J, Vrečer F, Vodopivec P, Zorko B, 2000. Optimisation of floating matrix tablets and evaluation of their gastric residence time. Int. J. Pharm 195, 125–135. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bomma R, Veerabrahma K, 2013. Development of gastroretentive drug delivery system for cefuroxime axetil: In vitro and in vivo evaluation in human volunteers. Pharm. Dev. Technol 18, 1230–1237. 10.3109/10837450.2012.660698 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Brambilla C, Kastanakis S, Knight S, Cunningham K, 1992. Cefuroxime and cefuroxime axetil versus amoxicillin plus clavulanic acid in the treatment of lower respiratory tract infections. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis 11, 118–124. https://doi.org/l0.1007/BF01967062 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Charkoftaki G, Dokoumetzidis A, Valsami G, Macheras P, 2011. Supersaturated dissolution data and their interpretation: the TPGS–carbamazepine model case. J. Pharm. Pharmacol 63, 352–361. 10.1111/j.2042-7158.2010.01226.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Deshpande AA, Rhodes CT, Shah NH, Malick AW, 1996. Controlled-Release Drug Delivery Systems for Prolonged Gastric Residence: An Overview. Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm 22, 531–539. 10.3109/03639049609108355 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  9. Deshpande AA, Shah NH, Rhodes CT, Malick W, 1997. Development of a novel controlled-release system for gastric retention. Pharm. Res 14, 815–819. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Dhumal RS, Biradar SV, Aher S, Paradkar AR, 2009. Cefuroxime axetil solid dispersion with polyglycolized glycerides for improved stability and bioavailability. J. Pharm. Pharmacol 61, 743–751. 10.1211/jpp.61.06.0006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Dhumal RS, Biradar SV, Yamamura S, Paradkar AR, York P, 2008. Preparation of amorphous cefuroxime axetil nanoparticles by sonoprecipitation for enhancement of bioavailability. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm 70, 109–115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Dhumal RS, Rajmane ST, Dhumal ST, Pawar AP, 2006. Design and evaluation of bilayer floating tablets of cefuroxime axetil for bimodal release. J. Sci. Ind. Res. (India). 65, 812–816. [Google Scholar]
  13. Fabre H, Ibork H, Lemer DA, 1994. Photoisomerization kinetics of cefuroxime axetil and related compounds. J. Pharm. Sei 83, 553–558. 10.1002/jps.2600830422 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Fell JT, 1996. Targeting of drugs and delivery systems to specific sites in the gastrointestinal tract. J. Anat 189 (Pt 3, 517–519. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Finn A, Straughn A, Meyer M, Chubb J, 1987. Effect of dose and food on the bioavailability of cefuroxime axetil. Biopharm. Drug Dispos. 8, 519–526. 10.1002/bdd.2510080604 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Fisher JF, Meroueh SO, Mobashery S, 2005. Bacterial Resistance to β-Lactam Antibiotics: Compelling Opportunism, Compelling Opportunity. Chem. Rev 105, 395–424. 10.1021/cr030102i [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Gordon E, Mouz N, Duée E, Dideberg O, 2000. The crystal structure of the penicillin-binding protein 2x from Streptococcus pneumoniae and its acyl-enzyme form: implication in drug resistance 11 Edited by Huber R. J. Mol. Biol 299, 477–485. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Harding SM, Williams PE, Ayrton J, 1984. Pharmacology of Cefuroxime as the 1-acetoxyethyl ester in volunteers. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 25, 78–82. 10.1128/aac.25.1.78 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Huttenrauch R, 1978. Molecular pharmaceutics as a basis for modem drug formulation. Acta Pharm. Technol. Suppl 6, 55–127. [Google Scholar]
  20. Iannuccelli V, Coppi G, Bernabei MT, Cameroni R, 1998. Air compartment multiple-unit system for prolonged gastric residence. Part I. Formulation study. Int. J. Pharm 174, 47–54. [Google Scholar]
  21. Leder RD, Carson DS, 1997. Cefuroxime axetil (ceftin): a brief review, infect. Dis. Obstet. Gynecol 5, 211–214. 10.1155/S1064744997000343 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Mader WJ, Higuchi T, 1970. Phase Solubility Analysis. CRC Crit. Rev. Anal. Chem 1, 193–215. https://doi.org/l0.1080/10408347008542734 [Google Scholar]
  23. Oszczapowicz I, Malafiej E, Horoszewicz-Malafiej A, Szelachowska M, Kuklewicz C, Sierańska E, 1995. Esters of cephalosporins. Part III. Separation and properties of the R and S isomers of the 1-acetoxyethyl ester of cefuroxime. Acta Pol. Pharm 52, 471–476. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Otun SO, Meehan E, Qi S, Craig DQM, 2015. The Use of Quasi-Isothermal Modulated Temperature Differential Scanning Calorimetry for the Characterization of Slow Crystallization Processes in Lipid-Based Solid Self-Emulsifying Systems. Pharm. Res 32, 1316–1324. https://doi.org/l0.1007/s11095-014-1535-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Perry CM, Brogden RN, 1996. Cefuroxime Axetil: A Review of its Antibacterial Activity, Pharmacokinetic Properties and Therapeutic Efficacy. Drugs 52, 125–158. https://doi.org/l0.2165/00003495-199652010-00009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Repka MA, Battu SK, Upadhye SB, Thumma S, Crowley MM, Zhang F, Martin C, McGinity JW, 2007. Pharmaceutical Applications of Hot-Melt Extrusion: Part II. Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm 33, 1043–1057. 10.1080/03639040701525627 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Repka MA, Majumdar S, Kumar Battu S, Srirangam R, Upadhye SB, 2008. Applications of hot-melt extrusion for drug delivery. Expert Opin. Drug Deliv. 5, 1357–1376. 10.1517/17425240802583421 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Rouge N, Buri P, Doelker E, 1996. Drug absorption sites in the gastrointestinal tract and dosage forms for site-specific delivery. Int. J. Pharm 136, 117–139. [Google Scholar]
  29. Shimpi S, Chauhan B, Mahadik KR, Paradkar A, 2004. Preparation and evaluation of diltiazem hydrochloride-Gelucire 43/01 floating granules prepared by melt granulation. AAPS PharmSciTech 5, e43–e43. 10.1208/pt050343 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Shimpi SL, Chauhan B, Mahadik KR, Paradkar A, 2005. Stabilization and Improved in Vivo Performance of Amorphous Etoricoxib using Gelucire 50/13. Pharm. Res 22, 1727–1734. 10.1007/sl1095-005-6694-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Siripuram PK, Bandari S, Jukanti R, Veerareddy PR, 2010. Formulation and Characterization of Floating Gelucire Matrices of Metoprolol Succinate. Dissolution Technol. 34–39. 10.14227/DT170310P34 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  32. Sommers DK, van Wyk M, Moncrieff J, Schoeman HS, 1984. Influence of food and reduced gastric acidity on the bioavailability of bacampicillin and cefuroxime axetil. Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol 18, 535–539. 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1984.tb02501.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Streubel A, Siepmann J, Bodmeier R, 2006. Drug delivery to the upper small intestine window using gastroretentive technologies. Curr. Opin. Pharmacol 6, 501–508. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Taylor LS, Zhang GGZ, 2016. Physical chemistry of supersaturated solutions and implications for oral absorption. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev 101, 122–142. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Timmermans J, Moës AJ, 1990. How well do floating dosage forms float? Int. J. Pharm 62, 207–216. [Google Scholar]
  36. United States Pharmacopeial Convention, 2000. United states of Pharmacopoeia and National Formulary (USP- 40, NF- 35). Rockville, MD. [Google Scholar]
  37. Van Den Abeele J, Rubbens J, Brouwers J, Augustijns P, 2017. The dynamic gastric environment and its impact on drug and formulation behaviour. Eur. J. Pharm. Sei 96, 207–231. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Vo AQ, Feng X, Pimparade M, Ye X, Kim DW, Martin ST, Repka MA, 2017. Dualmechanism gastroretentive drug delivery system loaded with an amorphous solid dispersion prepared by hot-melt extrusion. Eur. J. Pharm. Sei 102, 71–84. 10.1016/j.ejps.2017.02.040 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Wells J, Aulton M., 2007. Pharmaceutical Preformulation, in: Aulton’s Pharmaceutics: The Design and Manufacture of Medicines, pp. 355–357. [Google Scholar]
  40. Williams PEO, Harding SM, 1984. The absolute bioavailability of oral cefuroxime axetil in male and female volunteers after fasting and after food. J. Antimicrob. Chemother 13, 191–196. 10.1093/jac/13.2.191 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Zaro JL, 2014. Lipid-based drug carriers for prodrugs to enhance drug delivery. AAPS J. 17, 83–92. 10.1208/sl2248-014-9670-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES