Skip to main content
PeerJ logoLink to PeerJ
. 2019 Jun 27;7:e7167. doi: 10.7717/peerj.7167

Identification of microRNA-21 target genes associated with hair follicle development in sheep

Bo Zhai 1, Lichun Zhang 1, Chunxin Wang 1, Zhuo Zhao 1, Mingxin Zhang 1,, Xu Li 1,
Editor: Yuriy Orlov
PMCID: PMC6599667  PMID: 31293827

Abstract

Aim

The target molecule regulatory function of microRNA-21 (miR-21) in multiple signalling pathways has become a main focus of genetic and pharmacological regulatory studies of various diseases. The identification of target genes for miRNA-21 in the development of hair follicles can provide new research pathways for the regulation of cell development.

Methods

In the present study, eight six-month-old ewes from Super Merino (SM) and Small Tailed Han (STH) sheep breeds were selected. Target prediction and dual-luciferase wild-type and mutant vectors were used to identify the target genes of miR-21. Quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) and bioinformatics analysis were conducted to analyze the effects of miR-21.

Results

The results show that the expressions of CNKSR2, KLF3 and TNPO1 were downregulated by miRNA-21 at rates of 36%, 26% and 48%, respectively. Moreover, there was a significant negative correlation between the expression of miR-21 and the three target genes in sheep with two extreme phenotypes. The expression of microRNA-21in October was significantly lower than that in January and February; while the expression of CNKSR2, KLF3 and TNPO1 in October was higher than that in January and February. Conclusions: These results suggest that CNKSR2, KLF3 and TNPO1 are three newly discovered target genes of miR-21 and might be involved in the effects of miR-21 on hair follicle development.

Keywords: microRNA-21, Sheep, Hair follicles

Introduction

The skin is the largest organ system covering the surface of animals’ bodies and is divided into the epidermis, dermis and subcutaneous tissue. Hair follicles (HF) are a complex morphological and structural appendage of the skin that controls the growth of hair and whose most prominent characteristic is regeneration. HF consist of epithelial and dermal tissues (Alonso & Fuchs, 2006). The development process of hair follicles comprises a series of activities, such as proliferation, apoptosis, differentiation, migration and mutual connection between skin epithelial cells and dermal cells. HF can be divided into primary hair follicles and secondary hair follicles. An important characteristic of HFs is periodic growth, and HF usually undergo recurrent phases of growth (anagen), regression (catagen), and resting (telogen) with a defined periodicity (Millar, 2002; Botchkarev & Kishimoto, 2003). During the HF growth phase, stem cells are activated, hair buds extend downwards and interact with the hair papillae, and hair bulb epithelial cells and hair matrix cells continuously divide and proliferate, forming hair bulbs, inner root sheaths and hair shafts. With the growth of hair follicles, the HFs reach deep into the dermis and accessory structures, such as sebaceous glands and piloerection muscles, are also generated. During the retrograde period, the proliferation of dermal papilla cells is decreased, a large number of cells became apoptotic, the hair bulb epithelial tissues shrink, the dermal papillae are exposed, and the hair follicles became shorter overall, forming rod-like hairs. In the rest period, apoptosis is terminated, and the dermal papillae are in a dormant state (Schneider, Schmidt-Ullrich & Paus, 2009).

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are a class of endogenous genes that encode 22-nucleotide-long, non-coding, single-stranded RNA molecules that affect gene function by post-transcriptional regulation. Researchers have found that a variety of microRNAs are involved in the development of skin HFs (Andl et al., 2006; Liu et al., 2012; Zhu et al., 2010). HFs of the skin were sequenced during the growth, anagen and resting phases of Ovis aries and it was found that microRNA may regulate HF growth by modulating target genes in pathways such as MAPK and Wnt (Liu et al., 2013a; Liu et al., 2013b). MicroRNA-214 controls skin and HF development by modulating the activity of the Wnt pathway (Ahmed et al., 2014). miR-24 affects HF morphogenesis by targeting Tcf-3 (Amelio et al., 2013). miR-31 can regulate keratinocyte growth and hair differentiation through the target genes STK40 and LATS2(Luan et al., 2017). miR-200b and miR-196a may be associated with HF growth in transgenic mice by intraepithelial overexpression of DKK1 (Ryan, Olivera-Fernandes & Lavker, 2006). miR-184 can interfere with miR-205 and may inhibit HF growth and promote depression (Yu et al., 2008). miR-18b inhibits TGF- β1-mediated differentiation of human HF mesenchymal stem cells into smooth muscle cells by modulating the target gene SMAD2 (Liu et al., 2013a; Liu et al., 2013b). Post-transcriptional regulation of miR-22 may induce HF regression (Yuan et al., 2015). MicroRNA-21 is an important downstream component of BMP signalling in epidermal keratinocytes (Ahmed et al., 2011). At present, these reports mostly screen and identify microRNAs and their predicted gene targets; research addressing the regulatory mechanisms of the development of skin HF has received less attention. The elucidation of the identification and regulation of specific microRNAs has important implications for skin diseases and hair growth.

Here, we explore the applications of bioinformatics and a luciferase reporter assay in vitro to identify the target genes of miR-21. The results of the present study provide a basis for further investigation of miRNA-mediated HF development in sheep. New target genes would provide more pathways for the study of miR-21 in other animals.

Materials and Methods

Ethics statement. This study was carried out in strict accordance to relevant guidelines and regulations by the Ministry of Agriculture of the People’s Republic of China. All experimental protocols were approved by the Laboratory Animal centre of Jilin University (SKXK 2015-0006).

Animals. Eight six-month-old ewes from Super Merino (SM) and Small Tailed Han (STH) sheep breeds were selected from Jinlin province. To eliminate environmental effects, the two groups of ewes were housed on the same farm and provisioned with the same complete formula feed and hay. All skin and samples were collected during mid-October when the wool cycle was expected to be in the anagen phase.

Target prediction

Target prediction of microRNA-21 was performed using the algorithms TargetScan (http://www.targetscan.org/), Pita (http://genie.weizmann.ac.il/pubs/mir07/mir07_dyn_data.html) and miRanda (http://www.microrna.org/microrna/home.do). These algorithms are available from a previous report (Sun et al., 2014). In brief, TargetScan predictions are based on the matching of sites between the seed regions of microRNAs and mRNAs and miRanda predictions are based on the double-stranded free energy and species conservation. Pita predictions are based on target-site accessibility. All the prediction processes were conducted using custom-written executable files that computed the parameters between microRNAs and mRNAs based on the inherent algorithms and the set thresholds. The thresholds for the algorithms were as follows: the scores ≥70 for TargetScan; Δ ΔG ≤-5 for Pita; and seed ≥7 for miRanda. The intersections of the output results of the three algorithms were used as prediction results for the differentially expressed microRNAs (Sun et al., 2016).

Dual-luciferase reporter vector construction and luciferase reporter assays

The reaction conditions were as follows (landing PCR): 98 °C for 2 min of denaturation; cycling with denaturation at 98 °C for 10 s, annealing every loop drop 1 °C. From 65 °C, extension at 72 °C for 30 s; followed by 10 cycles starting with denaturation again at 98 °C for 10 s, annealing at 60 °C and then extension at 72 °C for 30 s. Finally, 15 cycles were performed, the extension was continued at 72 °C for 3 min after PCR cycles and the reactions were then stored at 4 °C.

PCR primers were designed based on the seed region sequences of candidate target genes (Ovis aries) with 3′ UTRs provided by the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI). Primers targeting the gene segments containing the seed sequences were designed with Xho I and Not I restriction enzyme sites incorporated. In addition, mutagenic primers were designed to specifically mutate 7 bases in the seed region of the candidate target genes. The primer sequences are listed in Table 1. Then, candidate target sequences containing wild-type and mutant seed regions were synthesized. The wild-type and mutant sequences were cloned into pmiR-RB-REPORT™ to construct wild-type and mutant reporter plasmids, respectively. The recombinant vector was sent to Guangzhou Ruibo Biotechnology Co., Ltd. for sequencing.

Table 1. Primers of targeting the seed region of the candidate target genes.

Name Sequence(5′–3′)
CNKSR2-W-F GGCGGCTCGAGTACACTGCGAGAGTTGGTAGA
CNKSR2-W-R AATGCGGCCGCCAAGAAGTAAGGAGAAAGTTAGG
CNKSR2-M-F ACAGATTGTATTCGAAATGTTTAGAGAATT
CNKSR2-M-R TAAACATTTCGAATACAATCTGTGAGTCCAATG TAG
KLF3-W -F GGCGGCTCGAGAGTGTTGCACTAATGTGGA
KLF3-W -R AATGCGGCCGCGAGTAGAAACAGAGAAGGAAC
KLF3-M -F TATATTTTTATTCGAAATAAGACTGAATGGGTA
KLF3-M -R GTCTTATTTCGAATAAAAATATATTACACTTTA
TNPO1-W -F GGCGGCTCGAGTAAGATTGGATGAGTTTTATGGAG
TNPO1-W -R AATGCGGCCGCACCCTCAAAACAAAAACCAAG
TNPO1-M -F AATTTTTGTATTCGAGCTGAATTTTAAAGAGAG
TNPO1-M -R AATTCAGCTCGAATACAAAAATTAAAACCGTAT

Notes.

Bold letter is the mutant sequence.

F
forward primer
R
reverse primer
W
wild type
M
mutant type

MiR-21 mimics (5 pmol) or negative control (NC 5 pmol) miR (Shanghai GenePharma Co., Ltd., China) of sheep were cotransfected with 2 ng of the candidate target gene-containing wild type, mutant or empty pmiR-RB-REPORT™ vector (negative control) into the 293T human renal epithelial cell line. The sequences are listed in Table 2. After culture for 48 h, Renilla luciferase and firefly luciferase activities were measured using a chemiluminescence reader.

Table 2. MiR-21 mimics / NC sequence.

Name Sequence(5′–3′)
MiR-21-mimics-F UAGCUUAUCAGACUGAUGUUGAC
MiR-21- mimics-R CAACAUCAGUCUGAUAAGCUAUU
NC-F UUCUCCGAACGUGUCACGUTT
NC-R ACGUGACACGUUCGGAGAATT

Notes.

NC
control group
F
forward primer
R
reverse primer

RNA extraction and quantitative real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR)

In October, January and February, to capture the different stages in hair follicle growth, four sheep were randomly selected. Total RNA from skin collected from the sides of the sheep was extracted using Trizol reagent (Invitrogen, USA) in accordance with the instruction manual provided by the manufacturer. Reverse transcription of miR-21 was conducted using the PrimeScript™ RT reagent Kit (TaKaRa, Japan). Reverse transcription reactions were prepared as follows: 2 µl of 5x PrimeScript Buffer, 0.5 µl of PrimeScript RT Enzyme Mix I, miR-21 RT primer (10 µM), 0.5 µl of U6 RT mix, and RNase-free ddH2O up to 10.0 µl. Reactions were performed with the following conditions: 37 °C, 15 min; 42 °C, 2 min; and 85 °C, 5 s. The reaction products were stored in a −80 °C freezer.

RT-qPCR was performed using SYBR Premier Dimer EraserTM (TaKaRa, Japan) and cDNA as the template according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The reaction mixes were prepared as follows: 0.5 µl of upstream primer (10 pmol/L), 0.5 µl of downstream primer (10 pmol/L), 8.0 µl of ddH2O, 1 µl of template and 10 µl of SYBR Premix Ex Taq II (2x). Reactions were performed with the following conditions: 95 °C for 30 s; and 40 cycles of 95 °C for 5 s followed by 60 °C for 30 s. The U6 small nuclear RNA (snRNA) was used as an internal control for miR-21, and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) was used as an internal control for other genes. Experimental data were analysed using a relative quantification method (2−△△CT). All reactions were performed in triplicate. The RT-qPCR primers are described in detail in Table 3.

Table 3. Primers used for RT-qPCR analysis.

Name Sequence(5′–3′)
MiR-21-RT GTCGTATCCAGTGCGTGTCGTGGAGTCGG CAATTGCACTGGATACGAC
MiR-21-F GGGTAGCTTATCAGACTGAT
MiR-21-R CAGTGCGTGTCGTGGAGT
U6-F CTCGCTTCGGCAGCACA
U6-R AACGCTTCACGAATTTGCGT
CNKSR2-F TTAGCTGAGAGCGAGCGGAT
CNKSR2-R CGCATTCAGACAGCAGTGGT
KLF3-F GTCATCTACTCCACGCCATTGTCG
KLF3-R GCTCCGCTTGTTGACTGTGAGG
TNPO1-F GCTTCCTTCCGTACTGTGAACCTG
TNPO1-R AATGTTGCCTCCAAGTCCTTCAGC
GAPDH-F GGTGAAGGTCGGTGTGAACG
GAPDH-R CTCGCTCCTGGAAGATGGTG

Notes.

U6
internal reference
F
forward primer
R
reverse primer
RT
Stem-loop RT primer

Statistical analysis

All quantitative data and luciferase reporter data are presented as the means ± SDs, and differences were assessed using one-way ANOVA followed by the Bonferroni multiple-comparison test. Values of p < 0.01 were considered statistically significant, and all analyses were performed using SPSS 20.0.

Results

Prediction of miR-21 target genes

According to the rules of bioinformatics for predicting target genes, miR-21 starts from the second base pair, and the three genes at the 3′ UTR sequence are matched with each other. The number of paired bases is more than seven, as shown in Fig. 1. The combined free energy is −16.7, −10.0 and −14.5 kcal/mol, respectively. Seed sequences are strictly conserved in species such as humans, cattle, sheep, and rats. Therefore, these three genes can be used as candidate target genes for later identification and verification.

Figure 1. Duplex structure between miR-21 and target genes.

Figure 1

(A) Duplex structure between miR-21 and MRE in the CNKSR2, KLF3 and TNPO1 mRNA predicted by mfold program (http://mfold.rna.albany.edu/?q=mfold). (B) Diagrams of WT or mutant MU constructs of miR-21 MRE in the CNKSR2, KLF3 and TNPO1 mRNA. Four nucleotides mutations were generated in the CNKSR2, KLF3 and TNPO1 binding sites to miR-21 seed region using pmiR-RB-REPORTTM.

Identification and expression of CNKSR2 target genes

To obtain the gene sequences, landing PCR was used to amplify CNKSR2 (Fig. 2A) and sequences with a length of 759 bp were identified by agarose gel electrophoresis; this length is consistent with the length provided in the nucleic acid database. The size of the 3′ UTR fragment obtained after digestion was confirmed to be the 1,000 bp expected size (Fig. 2B). The forward and reverse sequencing maps showed that the 3′ UTR sequence in the recombinant vector was exactly the same as the length of the PCR product (Fig. 2C) and the length provided in the GenBank database. The CDS sequence of the provided gene was the same, so the reporter recombinant vector was named CNKSR2-WT. After a similar procedure, the target sequence ATAAGCT was mutated to TATTCGA (Fig. 2D), and the remaining sequences were not changed. The reporter recombinant vector was named CNKSR2-Mut.

Figure 2. Dual luciferase reporter vector construction of CNKSR2.

Figure 2

(A) Landing PCR products, M: D2000; the size of the amplification is consistent with the theoretical size. (B) Construction of Vector Plasmids, M: D2000; the size of the amplification is consistent with the theoretical size. (C) Vector plasmid sequencing results. (D) Vector plasmid point mutation sequencing results. (E) Dual luciferase assays with CNKSR2 MRE wild-type (WT) (pmiR-RB-REPORTTM -WT-CNKSR2) or mutant (Mut) (pmiR-RB-REPORTTM -MUT- CNKSR2) constructs in the presence of miR-21 mimics or NC. (F) The relative mRNA expression levels of miR-21, CNKSR2 between SM sheeps and STH sheeps by RT-qPCR. Data are indicated as the means ± SE derived from triplicate transfectants of three independent experiments. * p < 0.05 stands for significant difference; ** p < 0.01 stands for extremely significant difference; p > 0.05 stands for no significant difference.

Under normal circumstances, the reporter fluorescence of miRNA mimics a 30% downregulation or more compared with that of the NC controls; after the corresponding binding site is mutated, the inhibition degree of the miRNA mimic reporter fluorescence is significantly reduced or eliminated compared with that of the mutant vector. We can infer that miRNA mimics can regulate reporter gene expression through this site. The dual-luciferase reporter gene expression analysis showed that the oar-miR-21 mimic significantly downregulated the reporter fluorescence of the three wild-type vectors. The reduction of the fluorescence rate of CNKSR2 was 36%. After the corresponding binding site was mutated, the reporter fluorescence in the mutant vector was significantly restored. Under this experimental model, oar-miR-21 may regulate the expression of the reporter gene through the corresponding 3′ UTR site on CNKSR2 (Fig. 2E). When the mRNA expression levels of miR-21 and CNKSR2 in the two extreme phenotypes were negatively correlated, highly significant differences were observed (Fig. 2F).

Identification and expression of KLF3 target genes

To obtain the gene sequences, landing PCR was used to amplify KLF3 (Fig. 3A). Fragments with a length of 607 bp were identified by agarose gel electrophoresis; this length is consistent with the length provided in the nucleic acid database. The expected size of the 3′ UTR fragment of the 850 bp obtained after digestion was confirmed (Fig. 3B). The forward and reverse sequencing maps showed that the 3′ UTR sequence in the recombinant vector was exactly the same as the length of the PCR product (Fig. 3C) and the length provided in the GenBank database. The CDS sequence of the provided gene was the same, so the reporter recombinant vector was named KLF3-WT.

Figure 3. Dual luciferase reporter vector construction of KLF3.

Figure 3

(A) Landing PCR products, M: D2000; the size of the amplification is consistent with the theoretical size. (B) Construction of Vector Plasmids, M: D2000; the size of the amplification is consistent with the theoretical size. (C) Vector plasmid sequencing results. (D) Vector plasmid point mutation sequencing results. (E) Dual luciferase assays with KLF3 MRE wild-type (WT) (pmiR-RB-REPORTTM -WT- KLF3) or mutant (Mut) (pmiR-RB-REPORTTM -MUT- KLF3) constructs in the presence of miR-21 mimics or NC. (F) The relative mRNA expression levels of miR-21, KLF3 between SM sheeps and STH sheeps by RT-qPCR. Data are indicated as the means ± SE derived from triplicate transfectants of three independent experiments. *p < 0.05 stands for significant difference; **p < 0.01 stands for extremely significant difference; p > 0.05 stands for no significant difference.

After a similar procedure, the target sequence ATAAGCT was mutated to TATTCGA (Fig. 3D), and the remaining sequences were not changed. The reporter recombinant vector was named KLF3-Mut. The reduction of the fluorescence rate of KLF3 was 26%. After the corresponding binding site was mutated, the reporter fluorescence in the mutant vector was significantly restored. Under this experimental model, oar-miR-21 may regulate the expression of the reporter gene through the corresponding 3′ UTR site on KLF3. When the mRNA expression levels of miR-21 and KLF3 in the two extreme phenotypes were negatively correlated, highly significant differences were observed (Fig. 3F).

Identification and expression of TNPO1 target genes

To obtain the gene sequences, landing PCR was used to amplify TNPO1 (Fig. 4A). Fragments with a length of 680 bp were identified by agarose gel electrophoresis; this length is consistent with the length provided in the nucleic acid database. The expected size of the 3′ UTR fragment of the 950 bp obtained after digestion was confirmed (Fig. 4B). The forward and reverse sequencing maps showed that the 3′ UTR sequence in the recombinant vector was exactly the same as the length of the PCR product (Fig. 4C) and the length provided in the GenBank database. The CDS sequence of the provided gene was the same, so the reporter recombinant vector was named TNPO1-WT.

Figure 4. Dual luciferase reporter vector construction of TNPO1.

Figure 4

(A) Landing PCR products, M: D2000; the size of the amplification is consistent with the theoretical size. (B) Construction of Vector Plasmids, M: D2000; the size of the amplification is consistent with the theoretical size. (C) Vector plasmid sequencing results. (D) Vector plasmid point mutation sequencing results. (E) Dual luciferase assays with TNPO1 MRE wild-type (WT) (pmiR-RB-REPORTTM-WT-TNPO1) or mutant (Mut) (pmiR-RB-REPORTTM -MUT- TNPO1) constructs in the presence of miR-21 mimics or NC. (F) The relative mRNA expression levels of miR-21, TNPO1 between SM sheeps and STH sheeps by RT-qPCR. Data are indicated as the means ± SE derived from triplicate transfectants of three independent experiments. *p < 0.05 stands for significant difference; **p < 0.01 stands for extremely significant difference; p > 0.05 stands for no significant difference.

After a similar procedure, the target sequence ATAAGCT was mutated to TATTCGA (Fig. 4D), and the remaining sequences were not changed. The reporter recombinant vector was named TNPO1-Mut. The reduction of the fluorescence rate of TNPO1 was 48%. After the corresponding binding site was mutated, the reporter fluorescence in the mutant vector was significantly restored. Under this experimental model, oar-miR-21 may regulate the expression of the reporter gene through the corresponding 3′ UTR site on TNPO1. When the mRNA expression levels of miR-21 and TNPO1 in the two extreme phenotypes were negatively correlated, highly significant differences were observed (Fig. 4F).

The expression pattern of miR-21 and three target genes in hair follicle development

RT-qPCR was used to obtain the expression pattern, 2−ΔΔCt method was used to quantify diferential expression level. The expression level of CNKSR2/KLF3/TNPO1 in October (HF flourishing period) are significantly higher than other months (p < 0.01) (Fig. 5A).The expression level of miR-21 in October are significantly decreases compared to other months (p < 0.01) (Fig. 5B). The expression level in January (HF degenerative period) and February (HF resting period) have no significant difference (p < 0.05).

Figure 5. The expression levels of miR-21 and target genes at different wool follicle development stage.

Figure 5

October: HF flourishing period ;January: HF degenerative period ;February: HF resting period. (A) The relative mRNA expression levels of target genes. (B) The relative mRNA expression levels of miR-21. Data are indicated as the means ± SE derived from triplicate transfectants of three independent experiments. *p < 0.05 stands for significant difference; **p < 0.01 stands for extremely significant difference; p < 0.05 stands for no significant difference.

Discussion

miRNA plays an important role in the growth and development of animals and exerts a variety of biological functions in various tissues and organs. Studies have found that miRNA-21 can regulate the proliferation and apoptosis of many kinds of cells (Feng et al., 2018; Hou et al., 2018; Zhou et al., 2018). miR-21 inhibits apoptosis in gliomas by inhibiting the expression of caspase 3 and 7 (Chan, Krichevsky & Kosik, 2005; Corsten et al., 2007). In addition to relying on caspases to regulate apoptosis, found that miR-21 can also affect the apoptosis of glioma cells through targeted regulation of the tumour suppressor gene PDCD4 (Chen et al., 2008). The study found that miR-21 can also target negatively regulated genes such as p53 and TGF- β as well as the mitochondrial apoptosis pathway gene for the voltage-dependent anion channel 1 (VDAC1) (Papagiannakopoulos, Shapiro & Kosik, 2008). In addition, miR-21 can also inhibit apoptosis by regulating FasL (Liu et al., 2018). Abnormally high expression of miR-21 in breast cancer patients suggests that miR-21 can promote tumour cell growth (Si et al., 2007). miR-21 regulates cellular proliferation, invasion, migration, and apoptosis by targeting PTEN, RECK and Bcl-2 in lung squamous carcinoma (Xu et al., 2014). miR-21 also has an inhibitory effect on the apoptosis of non-cancer cells. miR-21 is overexpressed in response to high glucose and protects endothelial cells from apoptosis (Zeng et al., 2013). Antagonists of miRNA-21 can regulate the proliferation and apoptosis of adventitial fibroblasts and myofibroblasts (Wang et al., 2012). miR-21 is the only post-transcriptional regulator that has a highly conserved effect on apoptosis in species.

In the present study, we predicted three target genes of miR-21 by the principles of free energy and base pairing and successfully constructed a dual-luciferase wild-type vector with three genes, CNKSR2, KLF3 and TNPO1. The base sequence ATAAGCT was mutated to TATTCGA, and a double-luciferase mutant vector of three genes was constructed. The successful construction of these two vectors provides the experimental basis for subsequent dual-luciferase reporter assays and functional identification of candidate genes.

To investigate whether miR-21 plays a role in HF development, the expression of miR-21 and its target genes were identified in two sheep varieties with extreme phenotypes and different development stages of HF, indicating that the three genes were regulated by miR-21 expression in the development of HFs. CNK (connector enhancer of kinase suppressor of Ras) is a putative multi-adaptor scaffold protein required in multiple receptor tyrosine kinase pathways, particularly in the RAS-RAF/ mitogen–activated protein kinase (MAPK) cascade, which is involved in conveying several proliferative and differentiative signals to the nucleus (Therrien, Wong & Rubin, 1998). The effect of miR-21 on the target regulation of the CNKSR2 gene may be mediated by modulating the PI3K-PTEN-AKT-FoxO3a pathway via the scaffold protein CNKSR2, which is involved in RAS-dependent signalling pathways. Thus, the proliferation of HF cells and the differentiation of HF stem cells were regulated, and the miR-21-CNKSR 2-MAPK signalling pathway was formed to regulate HF development. KLF3 has diverse biological roles, regulating proliferation, differentiation, and apoptosis in many tissues throughout development. KLF3 could inhibit cellular growth and suppress transformation mediated by oncogenic KRAS (V-Ki-ras2 Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homologue) and increase apoptosis in cancer cells (Fernandez-zapico, Lomberk & Tsuji, 2011). miR-204-5p regulates adipocyte differentiation by negatively regulating KLF3, a negative regulator of lipogenesis (Du, Zhang & Gan, 2018). In the case that KLF3 plays a significant role in cell proliferation and apoptosis, we speculated that miR-21 could regulate the growth and development of HF cells through KLF3 and thus affect the quality of wool. TNPO1, a translocation protein, facilitates the translocation of hnRNP A1 back to the nucleus. TNPO1 can affect the expression of downstream genes in a variety of ways. The chemokine receptor CCR2 undergoes transportin1-dependent nuclear translocation (Favre et al., 2008). Additionally, CCR2 gene expression induces apoptosis and inhibits the proliferation, migration, and invasion of PC-3M cells (Gao et al., 2013). Therefore, it can be speculated that miR-21 affects cell growth and development through TNPO1-regulated apoptosis and proliferation via CCR2; HF cell proliferation and hair follicle development may be impacted through the miR-21-TNPO1-CCR2 pathway.

In summary, we found that overexpression or inhibition of miR-21 could affect the gene expression of CNKSR2, KLF3 and TNPO1. Furthermore, the miR-21-CNKSR2-MAPK, miR-21-KLF3, miR-21-TNPO1-CCR2 pathway was found in HF cell development. Our results indicate a possible role for the involvement of miR-21 in HF development and suggest three potential targets genes of miR-21 that could be manually used to control HF development through gene therapy.

Conclusions

Our work is the first study on the potential functions of miRNA-21 in hair follicle development.Here, we also found three new genes related to the miRNA-21 which were CNKSR2, TNPO1 and KLF3. The miRNA-21 were negative correlation to three target gene in sheep with different wool quality. The data provide novel insights into the functions of miRNA-21 in hair follicle development.

Supplemental Information

Dataset S1. Dual-luciferase fluorescence reports data.

Each data point indicates the fluorescence value.

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.7167/supp-1
Dataset S2. RT-qPCR data between SM and STH.

Each data point indicates the Ct value.

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.7167/supp-2
Dataset S3. RT-qPCR data between different months.

Each data point indicates the Ct value.

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.7167/supp-3
Dataset S4. Construction of dual luciferase reporter vector.

The mutant vector and wild-type vector of the target gene were constructed by PCR, product purification, enzyme digestion, recycling, connection, transformation and colony PCR identification. Figures were PCR products, enzyme fragment and vector sequencing.

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.7167/supp-4

Funding Statement

This work was supported by the Agricultural Science and Technology Innovation Program of Jilin Province (CXGC2018ZY009)(C6215000217)(CXGC2017ZY001), Natural Science Foundation of Jilin Province of China (20190201174JC), the National Wool Sheep Industry Technical System (CARS-39-17). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Contributor Information

Mingxin Zhang, Email: zmxin@163.com.

Xu Li, Email: lixu34925@163.com.

Additional Information and Declarations

Competing Interests

The authors declare there are no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Bo Zhai conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, prepared figures and/or tables, approved the final draft.

Lichun Zhang analyzed the data.

Chunxin Wang contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools.

Zhuo Zhao and Mingxin Zhang overall experimental guidance.

Xu Li authored or reviewed drafts of the paper.

Animal Ethics

The following information was supplied relating to ethical approvals (i.e., approving body and any reference numbers):

Laboratory Animal centre of Jilin University provided full approval for this research (SKXK 2015-0006).

Data Availability

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

Data is available in the Supplemental Files.

References

  • Ahmed et al. (2014).Ahmed MI, Alam M, Emelianov VU, Poterlowicz K, Patel A, Sharov AA, Mardaryev AN, Botchkareva NV. MicroRNA-214 controls skin and hair follicle development by modulating the activity of the Wnt pathway. Journal of Cell Biology. 2014;207(4):549–567. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201404001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Ahmed et al. (2011).Ahmed MI, Mardaryev AN, Lewis CJ, Sharov AA, Botchkareva NV. MicroRNA-21 is an important downstream component of BMP signalling in epidermal keratinocytes. Journal of Cell Science. 2011;124(20):3399–3404. doi: 10.1242/jcs.086710. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Alonso & Fuchs (2006).Alonso L, Fuchs E. The hair cycle. Journal of Cell Science. 2006;119(3):391–293. doi: 10.1242/jcs02793. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Amelio et al. (2013).Amelio I, Lena AM, Bonanno E, Melino G, Candi E. miR-24 affects hair follicle morphogenesis targeting Tcf-3. Cell Death & Disease. 2013;4:e922. doi: 10.1038/cddis.2013.426. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Andl et al. (2006).Andl T, Murchison EP, Liu F, Zhang Y, Yunta-Gonzalez M, Tobias JW, Andl CD, Seykora JT, Hannon GJ, Millar SE. The miRNA-processing enzyme dicer is essential for the morphogenesis and maintenance of hair follicles. Current Biology. 2006;16(10):1041–1049. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2006.04.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Botchkarev & Kishimoto (2003).Botchkarev VA, Kishimoto J. Molecular control of epithelial-mesenchymal interactions duringhair follicle cycling. Journal of Investigative Dermatology Symposium Proceedings. 2003;8(1):46–55. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1747.2003.12171.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Chan, Krichevsky & Kosik (2005).Chan JA, Krichevsky AM, Kosik KS. MicroRNA-21 is an antiapoptotic factor in human glioblastoma cells. Cancer Research. 2005;65(14):6029–6033. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-0137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Chen et al. (2008).Chen Y, Liu W, Chao TF, Zhang Y, Yan X, Gong Y, Qiang B, Yuan J, Sun M, Peng X. MicroRNA-21 down-regulates the expression of tumor suppressor PDCD4 in human glioblastoma cell T98G. Cancer Letters. 2008;272(2):197–205. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2008.06.034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Corsten et al. (2007).Corsten MF, Miranda R, Kasmieh R, Krichevsky AM, Weissleder R, Shah K. MicroRNA-21 knockdown disrupts glioma growth in vivo and displays synergistic cytotoxicity with neural precursor cell delivered S-TRAIL in human gliomas. Cancer Research. 2007;67(19):8994–9000. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-1045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Du, Zhang & Gan (2018).Du J, Zhang P, Gan M. MicroRNA-204-5p regulates 3T3-L1 preadipocyte proliferation, apoptosis and differentiation. Gene. 2018;668:1–7. doi: 10.1002/psc.2550. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Favre et al. (2008).Favre N, Camps M, Arod C, Chabert C, Rommel C, Pasquali C. Chemokine receptor CCR2 undergoes transportin1-dependent nuclear translocation. Proteomics. 2008;8(21):4560–4576. doi: 10.1002/pmic.200800211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Feng et al. (2018).Feng MG, Liu CF, Chen L, Feng WB, Liu M, Hai H, Lu JM. MiR-21 attenuates apoptosis-triggered by amyloid- β via modulating PDCD4/ PI3K/AKT/GSK-3 β pathway in SH-SY5Y cells. Biomedicine and Pharmacotherapy. 2018;101:1003–1007. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2018.02.043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Fernandez-zapico, Lomberk & Tsuji (2011).Fernandez-zapico ME, Lomberk GA, Tsuji S. A functional family-wide screening of SP/KLF proteins identifies a subset of suppressors of KRAS-mediated cell growth. Biochemical Journal. 2011;435:529–537. doi: 10.1042/BJ20100773. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Gao et al. (2013).Gao J, Wang A, Zhang M, Li H, Wang K, Han Y, Wang Z, Shi C, Wang W. RNAi targeting of CCR2 gene expression induces apoptosis and inhibits the proliferation, migration, and invasion of PC-3M cells. Oncology Research. 2013;21(2):73–82. doi: 10.3727/096504013X13775486749173. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Hou et al. (2018).Hou N, Guo Z, Zhao G, Jia G, Luo B, Shen X, Bai Y. Inhibition of microRNA-21-3p suppresses proliferation as well as invasion and induces apoptosis by targeting RNA-binding protein with multiple splicing through Smad4/extra cellular signal-regulated protein kinase signalling pathway in human colorectal cancer HCT116 cells. Clinical and Experimental Pharmacology and Physiology. 2018;45(7):729–741. doi: 10.1111/1440-1681.12931. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Liu et al. (2013b).Liu G, Liu R, Li Q, Tang X, Yu M, Li XY, Cao JH, Zhao SH. Identification of microRNAs in wool follicles during Anagen, Catagen and Telogen Phases in Tibetan Sheep. PLOS ONE. 2013b;8(10):e77801. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0077801. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Liu et al. (2013a).Liu X, Song L, Liu J, Wang S, Tan X, Bai XG, Bai TT, Wang YM, Li MY, Song YL, Li YL. miR-18b inhibits TGF- β1-induced differentiation of hair follicle stem cells into smooth muscle cells by targeting SMAD2. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications. 2013a;438(3):551–556. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2013.07.090. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Liu et al. (2018).Liu Y, Ren L, Liu W, Xiao Z. MiR-21 regulates the apoptosis of keloid fibroblasts by caspase-8 and mitochondrial-mediated apoptotic signaling pathway via targeting FasL. Biochemistry and Cell Biology. 2018;96(5):548–555. doi: 10.1139/bcb-2017-0306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Liu et al. (2012).Liu ZH, Xiao HM, Li HP, Zhao YH, Lai SY, Yu XL, Cai T, Du CG, Zhang WG, Li GQ. Identification of conserved and novel microRNAs in cashmere goat skin by deep sequencing. PLOS ONE. 2012;7(12):e50001. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0050001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Luan et al. (2017).Luan L, Shi J, Yu Z, Andl T. The major miR-31 target genes STK40 and LATS2 and their implications in the regulation of keratinocyte growth and hair differentiation. Experimental Dermatology. 2017;26(6):497–504. doi: 10.1111/exd.13355. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Millar (2002).Millar SE. Molecular mechanisms regulating hair follicle development. Journal of Investigative Dermatology. 2002;118:216–225. doi: 10.1046/j.0022-202x.2001.01670.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Papagiannakopoulos, Shapiro & Kosik (2008).Papagiannakopoulos T, Shapiro A, Kosik KS. MicroRNA-1 targets a network of key tumor suppressive pathways in glioblastoma cells. Cancer Research. 2008;68(19):8164–8172. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-1305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Ryan, Olivera-Fernandes & Lavker (2006).Ryan DG, Olivera-Fernandes M, Lavker RM. MicroRNAs of the mammalian eye display distinct and overlapping tissue specific. Molecular Vision. 2006;12(10):1175–1184. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Schneider, Schmidt-Ullrich & Paus (2009).Schneider MR, Schmidt-Ullrich R, Paus R. The hair follicle as a dynamic miniorgan. Current Biology. 2009;19(3):R132–R142. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2008.12.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Si et al. (2007).Si ML, Zhu S, Wu H, Lu Z, Wu F, Mo YY. miR-21-mediated tumor growth. Oncogene. 2007;26(19):2799–2803. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1210083. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Sun et al. (2014).Sun T, Li S, Yang J, Yin Y, Ling S. Identification of amicroRNA regulator for axon guidance in the olfac-tory bulb of adult mice. Gene. 2014;547(2):319–328. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2014.06.063. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Sun et al. (2016).Sun T, Li W, Li T, Ling S. MicroRNA Profiling of Amniotic Fluid: evidence of Synergy of microRNAs in Fetal Development. PLOS ONE. 2016;11(5):e0153950. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0153950. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Therrien, Wong & Rubin (1998).Therrien M, Wong AM, Rubin GM. CNK, a RAF-binding multidomain protein required for RAS signaling. Cell. 1998;95:343–353. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81766-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Wang et al. (2012).Wang F, Zhao XQ, Liu JN, Wang ZH, Wang XL, Hou XY, Liu R, Gao F, Zhang MX, Zhang Y, Bu PL. Antagonist of microRNA-21 improves balloon injury-induced rat iliac artery remodeling by regulating proliferation and apoptosis of adventitial fibroblasts and myofibroblasts. Journal of Cellular Biochemistry. 2012;113(9):2989–3001. doi: 10.1002/jcb.24176. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Xu et al. (2014).Xu LF, Wu ZP, Chen Y, Zhu QS, Hamidi S, Navab R. MicroRNA-21 (miR-21) regulates cellular proliferation, invasion, migration, and apoptosis by targeting PTEN, RECK and Bcl-2 in lung squamous carcinoma, Gejiu City, China. PLOS ONE. 2014;9(8):e103698. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0103698. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Yu et al. (2008).Yu J, Ryan DG, Getsios S, Oliveira-Fernandes M, Fatima A, Lavker RM. MicroRNA-184 antagonizes microRNA- 205 to maintain SHIP2 levels in epithelia. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2008;105(49):19300–19305. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0803992105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Yuan et al. (2015).Yuan S, Li F, Meng Q, Zhao Y, Chen L, Zhang H, Xue L, Zhang X, Lengner C, Yu Z. Post-transcriptional regulation of keratinocyte progenitor cell expansion, differentiation and hair follicle regression by miR-22. PLOS Genetics. 2015;11(5):e1005253. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1005253. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Zeng et al. (2013).Zeng J, Xiong Y, Li G, Liu M, He T, Tang Y, Chen Y, Cai L, Jiang R, Tao J. MiR-21 is overexpressed in response to high glucose and protects endothelial cells from apoptosis. Experimental and Clinical Endocrinology & Diabetes. 2013;121(7):425–430. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1345169. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Zhou et al. (2018).Zhou B, Wang D, Sun G, Mei F, Cui Y, Xu H. Effect of miR-21 on apoptosis in lung cancer cell through inhibiting the PI3K/ Akt/NF- κB signaling pathway in vitro and in vivo. Cellular Physiology and Biochemistry. 2018;46(3):999–1008. doi: 10.1159/000488831. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Zhu et al. (2010).Zhu Z, He J, Jia X, Jiang J, Bai R, Yu X, Lv L, Fan R, He X, Geng J, You R, Dong Y, Qiao D, Lee KB, Smitha GW, Dong C. MicroRNA-25 functions in regulation of pigmentation by targeting the transcription factor MITF in alpaca (Lama pa-cos)skin melanocytes. Domestic Animal Endocrinology. 2010;38(3):200–209. doi: 10.1016/j.domaniend.2009.10.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Dataset S1. Dual-luciferase fluorescence reports data.

Each data point indicates the fluorescence value.

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.7167/supp-1
Dataset S2. RT-qPCR data between SM and STH.

Each data point indicates the Ct value.

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.7167/supp-2
Dataset S3. RT-qPCR data between different months.

Each data point indicates the Ct value.

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.7167/supp-3
Dataset S4. Construction of dual luciferase reporter vector.

The mutant vector and wild-type vector of the target gene were constructed by PCR, product purification, enzyme digestion, recycling, connection, transformation and colony PCR identification. Figures were PCR products, enzyme fragment and vector sequencing.

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.7167/supp-4

Data Availability Statement

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

Data is available in the Supplemental Files.


Articles from PeerJ are provided here courtesy of PeerJ, Inc

RESOURCES