Skip to main content
Royal Society Open Science logoLink to Royal Society Open Science
. 2019 Jun 5;6(6):190252. doi: 10.1098/rsos.190252

Quantifying susceptibility of marine invertebrate biocomposites to dissolution in reduced pH

Matthew Chadwick 1,✉,, Elizabeth M Harper 1, Anaëlle Lemasson 2, John I Spicer 2, Lloyd S Peck 3
PMCID: PMC6599774  PMID: 31312491

Abstract

Ocean acidification threatens many ecologically and economically important marine calcifiers. The increase in shell dissolution under the resulting reduced pH is an important and increasingly recognized threat. The biocomposites that make up calcified hardparts have a range of taxon-specific compositions and microstructures, and it is evident that these may influence susceptibilities to dissolution. Here, we show how dissolution (thickness loss), under both ambient and predicted end-century pH (approx. 7.6), varies between seven different bivalve molluscs and one crustacean biocomposite and investigate how this relates to details of their microstructure and composition. Over 100 days, the dissolution of all microstructures was greater under the lower pH in the end-century conditions. Dissolution of lobster cuticle was greater than that of any bivalve microstructure, despite its calcite mineralogy, showing the importance of other microstructural characteristics besides carbonate polymorph. Organic content had the strongest positive correlation with dissolution when all microstructures were considered, and together with Mg/Ca ratio, explained 80–90% of the variance in dissolution. Organic content, Mg/Ca ratio, crystal density and mineralogy were all required to explain the maximum variance in dissolution within only bivalve microstructures, but still only explained 50–60% of the variation in dissolution.

Keywords: ocean acidification, microstructure, bivalves, dissolution, crustaceans

1. Introduction

The rising levels of atmospheric and oceanic pCO2 causing ocean acidification (OA) are predicted to lower seawater pH from approximately 8.1 to approximately 7.6 by 2100 [1]. The lower pH will reduce the saturation state of calcium carbonate in the oceans, presenting a direct threat to marine calcifiers by increasing the risk of dissolution, as well as inhibiting the production, of their mineralized components [25]. Due to the ecological and economic importance of many marine calcifiers (e.g. commercial shellfishing), there has been extensive work examining the potential effects of OA on shell production across a range of taxa [69]. The results of these studies differ, probably due to the complexity and number of variables in biological systems. By contrast, fewer studies have considered the impact of shell dissolution on maintaining shell integrity, especially important in longer-lived taxa [10,11]. While skeletal costs are a relatively small part of a calcifier's energy budget, when compared with metabolic costs, end-century pH conditions have been shown to substantially increase the skeletal costs in multiple bivalve species [12]. This study focuses on the susceptibility of different calcified skeletons to dissolution under acidified conditions, independent of any mediation that might occur in a living organism, and thus to explore which shell types are most vulnerable.

Skeletal hardparts are hierarchical biocomposites consisting of a stiff mineralized component embedded in a softer, organic matrix [13,14]. The detailed microstructural arrangements of these biocomposites are very varied with differences presumably driven by selection pressures (mechanical strength, density, ease of deposition and resistance to dissolution/corrosion) [15] with different taxa prioritizing different qualities [16]. Here, we address susceptibility to dissolution in acidified seawaters, although such chemical attack may also result from activities of drilling predators [17] or endolithic organisms [18] that bore into the shell. Factors affecting shell dissolution—measured as thickness loss in this study—include the relative solubility of both the mineralized and organic phases. While inorganic calcite is 35% less soluble than aragonite [19,20], other factors, such as crystal size [15], crystallographic orientation [21], Mg/Ca ratio [22] and the presence of organic material both within and between crystals [15,23,24], may also be important predictors of dissolution. A high proportion of organic matrix might either protect the mineral component or itself be preferentially lost, releasing acid residues [24] or simply causing shell disintegration through crystal loss rather than dissolution [25].

Molluscan shell microstructures have long been of interest because of their extraordinary diversification over the last 540 million years and also the ecological and economic importance of many mollusc species. Bivalve microstructures are the most diverse within this phylum, all shells being made of one or more microstructures arranged in discrete layers, with either calcite or aragonite mineralized components. The crystals show a wide range of morphologies and sizes and are arranged in dramatically different amounts of organic matrix (0.1–12 wt%) [26,27]. Crustaceans, another economically and ecologically important group, have a chitin-based cuticle strengthened by calcite and amorphous calcium carbonate (ACC) [28]. The chitin composition of crustacean cuticle makes it an interesting comparison with the dominantly mineralogical composition of bivalve shells. We investigate dissolution of a range of common bivalve microstructures and compare them with that of a crustacean using both ambient and predicted end-century seawater pHs.

Specifically, we test the following hypotheses:

  • The predicted pH for end-century seawater will lead to greater dissolution of all microstructures.

  • Mineralogy is the most important determinant of shell loss, with calcitic microstructures being more resistant.

  • Other factors, such as low organic contents, higher Mg/Ca ratios and smaller crystals with the associated high surface area : volume, also promote dissolution.

  • Shell loss is observable as etching on the mineral component as opposed to attacking the organic matrix.

2. Methodology

2.1. Material

We selected bivalve taxa that provided seven key microstructures widespread among the class (nacre, composite prisms, ‘homogeneous’ and crossed-lamellar (all aragonitic), calcitic prisms (columnar and fibrous) and calcitic foliae) [26] (table 1). We also tested the calcitic carapace of the European lobster. Material was obtained (table 1) from living organisms and kept wet throughout preparation in order to ensure that the natural relationship between the mineral and matrix components was maintained. Representative sections of each microstructure were characterized (organic content, crystal density and Mg/Ca).

Table 1.

Source, microstructure and mineralogy for the eight sampled species.

mineralogy and microstructure taxon used source of materials
aragonite: nacre internal layer of Anodonta cygnea (swan mussel) [29] Maidenhead Aquatics, Cambridge, UK
aragonite: composite prisms external layer of Ruditapes philippinarum (Manilla clam) [30] Cambridge Market, UK
aragonite: crossed-lamellar external layer of Ensis ensis (razor clam) [31] Portland Shellfisheries, UK
aragonite: ‘homogeneous’ external layer of Arctica islandica [32] Millport, Scotland, UK
calcite: columnar prisms external layer of Atrina pectinata [33] Cape d'Aguilar, Hong Kong
calcite: fibrous prisms external layer of Mytilus edulis (blue mussel) [34] Cambridge Market, UK
calcite: foliae external layer of Pecten maximus (king scallop) [35] Portland Shellfisheries, UK
chitin microfibres reinforced with calcite and ACC claw of Homarus gammarus (European lobster) [28] Portland Shellfisheries, UK

2.2. Microstructure characterization

Organic content was determined using thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), where weight loss on accurate temperature ramping (100–500°C) allows material proportions to be identified. We ran 5–15 mg ground samples (from which all adherent periostracum had been removed) on a TAQ500 following the protocol of Harper et al. [36]. Crystal morphology and distribution of organic material were determined by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) of fractured or polished and etched samples (using a QEMSCAN 650F at accelerating voltages of 10 kV) following a similar method to Bieler et al. [26]. Micrographs of three random 50 µm2 areas from polished samples were used to calculate the number of exposed crystals/area (crystal density). Crystal units were defined for the composite prisms by the larger prismatic units rather than the individual fibres [26] as they define the dominant crystal edges in the microstructure. Similarly, for the crossed-lamellar, we measured the first-order lamellae as the major units (e.g. [37]). For the crystal density of lobster, we measured the density of pores in the chitin lattice as an equivalent metric. The relative concentrations of magnesium and calcium were determined on polished samples by an electron nanoprobe analysis on a Cameca SX100.

2.3. Dissolution experiment

For each microstructure, 30 samples were embedded in individual polyester resin blocks, before being ground and polished down to a 9 µm grit to expose shell (free of any periostracum) with the desired microstructure at the surface. All of the polished blocks were kept moist to ensure the organics did not dry out. Fifteen blocks per microstructure were exposed to one of two pH treatments: ambient (pH 7.89) and reduced (pH 7.65). The OA mesocosm system used during the experiment was set up in the University of Plymouth and was the one described in Lemasson et al. [38] (environmental parameter variations in electronic supplementary material, A). Briefly, each of the two treatments consisted of an 80 l seawater header tank aerated with either ambient air (pCO2 ≈ 400 ppm; pH ≈ 7.89) or CO2-enriched air (pCO2 ≈ 1000 ppm; pH ≈ 7.65). CO2 levels in the gas supplies were recorded using a CO2 analyser (LI-820; LI-COR, Lincoln, NE, USA) and adjusted manually to the desired level twice daily. Seawater was gravity-fed from each of the header tanks into six 3 l replicate tanks at a constant rate of approximately 60 ml min−1. The 15 blocks for each microstructure and treatment were divided between the six replicate tanks. Excess seawater was allowed to overflow from the tanks to the sump, where it was filtered, aerated and recirculated to the header tanks. Seawater in the system originated from Plymouth Sound (UK) and, following mechanical filtering and UV sterilization, was added and replaced on a daily basis to account for evaporation. Filtration and UV treatment resulted in only partial sterilization, enough to allow the build-up, but not over-accumulation, of microbial life. Deionized water was added as needed to maintain stable salinity levels. Temperature, salinity and pH were measured daily in all replicate tanks as described in Lemasson et al. [38]. Total alkalinity was measured once a week in each of the replicate tanks (details in electronic supplementary material, A).

All blocks were removed after 100 days exposure. One block from each microstructural type and treatment was retained to study patterns of dissolution by SEM (as above). The remainder were used to estimate the amount of dissolution. This was achieved in a similar way to that described in Kennish & Lutz [39] whereby the block was topped up by further resin, sawn along central lines and thickness loss relative to the initial resin surface was measured using the graticule of an optical microscope. A minimum of 30 measurements were taken for each microstructure and treatment.

2.4. Statistics

The dissolution between treatments was compared and related to the properties for each microstructure. Two-way ANOVAs were used to compare dissolution between treatments for each microstructure (electronic supplementary material, B, table S1). Multiple regression analysis (electronic supplementary material, B, table S2) was used to investigate the relative importance of each microstructural characteristic in relation to shell dissolution. All of the statistical tests were conducted using Microsoft Excel.

3. Results

All of the sampled microstructures showed clear signs of dissolution under ambient and reduced pH conditions (visual observations; figures 1 and 2). Under both treatments, there was an order of magnitude greater dissolution of the lobster cuticle, which lost most of the total thickness (visual observations), than any of the bivalve microstructures (figure 3). The dissolution for all the bivalves was greater at the lower pH (p ≪ 0.01). The ordering of dissolution susceptibility was largely the same between treatments, although composite aragonite prisms and crossed-lamellar aragonite swapped positions as the most susceptible bivalve microstructure (figure 3) and columnar calcite prisms were much more resistant to dissolution under the ambient pH conditions (figure 3).

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

SEM images of the calcite microstructures—columnar prisms (a,b), fibrous prisms (c,d), foliae (e,f) and chitin microfibres reinforced with calcite and ACC (g,h)—before (left—a,c,e,g) and after (right—b,d,f,h) 100 days under reduced pH. Red arrows indicate areas of dissolution after 100 days. Blue arrows indicate the organic jackets around the columnar prisms (a,b).

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

SEM images of the aragonite microstructures—‘homogeneous’ (a,b), nacre (c,d), crossed-lamellar (e,f) and composite prisms (g,h)—before (left—a,c,e,g) and after (right—b,d,f,h) 100 days under reduced pH. Red arrows indicate areas of dissolution after 100 days.

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Thickness loss for ambient and reduced pH treatments. The mineralogy is given in brackets after each microstructure. Error bars are ±1 s.d. Note the different ordinate axis scales for the main plot and the inset for the European lobster.

SEM (figures 1 and 2) revealed dissolution of the originally polished surfaces. Our observation of the pattern of dissolution (marked by red arrows in figures 1 and 2) shows it occurs preferentially along grain boundaries between crystals. In all the samples at reduced pH, the organic envelopes have been removed at the same rate as the neighbouring mineralized components. This is clearest in figure 1a,b where the organic envelope (marked by the blue arrows) of the Atrina pectinata is level with the surface of the prisms both before and after dissolution. By contrast, the organic jackets are more resistant than the prisms in A. pectinata when etched with dilute HCl (M. Chadwick 2017, personal observation).

Organic content (table 2) strongly and positively correlated with dissolution under both treatments (p ≪ 0.01) when all eight species were included in the regression (electronic supplementary material, B, table S2). There was also a significant correlation (p < 0.01) if the lobster and nacre were excluded. There was no significant correlation for Mg/Ca ratio (table 2) in the bivalves (p = 0.33), but there was a strong positive correlation with dissolution when lobster cuticle was included in the regression (p ≪ 0.01). There was a negative trend for crystal density (table 2) within the bivalves, but the relationship was not significant (p = 0.18).

Table 2.

Microstructural characteristics. Values given as mean ± 1 s.d.

microstructure measured crystal density (crystals/(50 µm)2) (n = 3) measured organic content (wt%) (n = 4) measured Mg/Ca ratioa (n = 3)
nacre (aragonite) 155 ± 7 4.2 ± 0.6 0
composite prisms (aragonite) 5.7 ± 1.5 2.32 ± 0.08 0
crossed-lamellar (aragonite) 100 ± 10 2.17 ± 0.06 0
‘homogeneous’ (aragonite) 790 ± 210 1.79 ± 0.06 0
columnar prisms (calcite) 3.0 ± 0.5 1.5 ± 0.1 0.0101 ± 0.0006
fibrous prisms (calcite) 850 ± 190 1.42 ± 0.06 0.0021 ± 0.0003
foliae (calcite) 1700 ± 200 1.1 ± 0.1 0.0055 [40]
lobster cuticle (calcite and ACC with α-chitin) 240 ± 10 22 ± 2 0.051 ± 0.003

aOnly the calcitic microstructures have [Mg] above the detection limit for the nanoprobe (approx. 100 ppm). Foliae is the only calcitic sample with a zero [Mg] and for the analysis, an Mg/Ca value of 0.0055 is taken from Freitas et al. [40].

Multiple regression analysis values (electronic supplementary material, B, table S2) show that when all eight microstructures were included, organic content and Mg/Ca were the best predictors of dissolution (p ≪ 0.01) under both treatments, and when combined, they explained 80–90% of the variance in dissolution. For both treatments, organic content of the skeleton was the more important of the two predictors. When considering just the bivalve microstructures, only 50–60% of the variance in dissolution could be explained by the measured factors and for the reduced pH treatment, the most significant correlation (p ≪ 0.01) required the inclusion of organic content, Mg/Ca, crystal density and mineralogy as predictors. For the ambient pH treatment, only organic content, Mg/Ca and crystal density were required to get the most significant correlation (p ≪ 0.01), notably not mineralogy. For reduced pH, the most important predictor was mineralogy, whereas for ambient pH, it was the Mg/Ca ratio.

4. Discussion

The susceptibility of molluscs to shell loss in undersaturated waters is well known in fresh water [41], cold waters [23], deep sea [39] and natural CO2 vents [42], hence the concern for these, and other calcifying organisms, under predicted end-century pH conditions. We sought to investigate whether certain biocomposites were more resistant to such loss and therefore which species will be required to invest more energy in shell maintenance under OA.

Even during a mollusc's lifetime, damage to the periostracum, the outer protective membrane, is common [43]. By removing the periostracum from our samples (or the epicuticle on the lobster samples), we have investigated the susceptibility of the underlying microstructure to dissolution under acidified conditions. Under future OA, there is a chance that calcifying organisms will be able to alleviate this dissolution through targeted compensatory skeleton growth. However, additional skeletal growth has an associated energy cost and thus species with more susceptible skeletal microstructures are likely to have a reduced fitness under OA.

As hypothesized, our experiments showed that even over a 100-day period, dissolution was evident as thickness loss and corroded surfaces in both ambient and reduced pH treatments, and were greater in the latter. Of particular interest is whether, based on their inorganic properties [19,20], calcitic shells are more resistant to dissolution than aragonitic ones. Calcitic layers have evolved multiple times within both the bivalve and gastropod molluscs, particularly in epifaunal shallow water taxa where such layers have always been added to the outside of the shell. This has been suggested as an adaptation against shell dissolution in undersaturated habitats [23,44,45]. However, in our experiment, although calcite was found to be the most important predictor of dissolution-resistance under reduced pH among bivalves, it only explained 27% of the variance in the data (electronic supplementary material, B). Most surprising was the observation that the calcitic lobster cuticle was the most susceptible microstructure. This may be explained by the high levels of metastable ACC in the endocuticle [28], where the skeleton consists of three parts, the epicuticle, the exocuticle and the endocuticle. These high dissolution rates of lobster cuticle could also explain why decapod crustaceans have a relatively poor fossil record [46].

The quantity and distribution of the organic component is important because greater amounts of organics might be expected to shield the mineralized components from contact with the seawater and inhibit dissolution. Alternatively, organics might actually enhance dissolution by promoting the growth of microbes that release acids [24] or facilitate the disaggregation of mineral grains by the loss of binding organics [25,47]. The distribution of organics should also have an effect because more unevenly distributed organics will result in more localized enhancement/inhibition of the dissolution. In our study, the multiple regression analysis emphasized the importance of organic content as a predictor for dissolution. The high dissolution of the lobster cuticle may be related to its ACC content rather than its organic content. However, the bivalve microstructures, with nacre excluded, also show a significant positive correlation (p ≪ 0.01) between organic content and dissolution. Within the bivalve microstructures tested, the organic content of nacre was twice that of the others, but the more homogeneous distribution of organics, with each nacre tablet having its own protein envelope [48], probably increased resistance and reduced the relative levels of dissolution. The discrepancy between the seeming susceptibility of organics in the mesocosm and their resilience under etching could be explained by the presence of microbes in seawater, supported by the prolific evidence for endolithic algae boring in the more organic-rich nacre (E.M. Harper 2017, personal observation).

The mesocosm seawater is not fully ‘natural’ due to the sterilization and filtering in the experimental set-up. However, the partial sterilization is necessary to keep overproliferation of microbial life from occurring over exposure periods of weeks and months. The presence of biofilms and endolithic algae boring on the post-dissolution samples (M. Chadwick & E.M. Harper 2017, personal observation) indicates that the conditions were not completely sterile. In unsterilized seawater, with a higher microbe activity, high organic contents would be expected to further promote dissolution than in sterile conditions. Therefore, while the conditions within the mesocosm are an important consideration, our conclusions are still expected to be a faithful, if possibly conservative, representation of ‘natural’ seawater conditions.

The Mg/Ca ratio would be expected to influence dissolution because calcite with a higher Mg content has been shown to be less stable in aqueous solutions [22]. This is supported in this study by the strong positive correlation with dissolution when all the samples were considered. However, this relationship was probably due to the strong statistical pull caused by lobster cuticle having much higher values for both dissolution and Mg/Ca than any of the bivalves. When the analysis was restricted to only the bivalves, the Mg/Ca ratio had no significant influence on shell dissolution, although it did account for the most variance (approx. 42%) under ambient conditions.

Crystal size and orientation might be expected to have an effect on solubility because dissolution should preferentially occur along crystal edges, and so microstructures with larger crystals or with crystals orientated to show a larger ‘face’ at the surface will have a lower density of grain boundaries and should be more resistant to dissolution. However, although the SEM evidence showed preferential loss of material along crystal boundaries, the relationship with dissolution was not significant (p = 0.18), in contrast with previous work [15]. On the other hand, low crystal densities were generally related to higher organic contents and so the effect from the organics may have overridden any crystal density effect.

5. Conclusion

All sampled species suffered significantly higher dissolution under lower pH, but the lobster skeleton was much more susceptible to dissolution than any of the bivalves. Within the bivalves, calcite mineralogies were generally more resistant to dissolution, but organic content, Mg/Ca and crystal density were also important factors affecting susceptibility. By contrast, dissolution variation between all microstructures was most strongly correlated with just organic content and Mg/Ca ratio, with high organic content as the main predictor for higher dissolution. This counters the commonly held view that organic matter within the shell should act to shield the mineralogy from dissolution, with the possible exception of nacre, where data suggested the distribution of organics is important and not just the absolute amount (wt%). Although the majority of the variance in dissolution across all microstructures could be explained by the predictors studied here, within just the bivalves, there was almost 50% variation that remains unexplained. Factors that could be involved include crystallographic orientation of the mineralogy and the composition of the organic phase. Notwithstanding the effects of having living organisms within the shells, the seemingly greater susceptibility of lobster to OA could have important ecological consequences for predator–prey interactions in the future.

Supplementary Material

Mesocosm Environmental Data and TA Methodology
rsos190252supp1.docx (193.3KB, docx)
Reviewer comments

Supplementary Material

Statistical Analysis
rsos190252supp2.docx (24.8KB, docx)

Acknowledgements

We thank Iris Buisman, Giulio Lampronti and Rob Cornell for providing technical assistance.

Data accessibility

Data (values for microstructural characteristics (mineralogy, crystal density, organic content, Mg/Ca ratio) and thickness loss under both pH treatments (ambient and reduced)) are available from the Dryad Digital Repository at: https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.mm05699 [49].

Authors' contributions

M.C. carried out the TGA, SEM and electron microprobe work, carried out the data analysis and drafted the manuscript; E.M.H. and L.S.P. conceived the study, designed the study, coordinated the study, helped in laboratory work, helped in data analysis and edited the manuscript; J.I.S. provided access to the mesocosm facilities, set up the mesocosm and helped coordinate the study; A.L. set up and conducted the mesocosm work and provided input on the manuscript. All authors gave final approval for publication.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Funding

We received no funding for this study.

References

  • 1.Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. 2013. Climate change 2013—the physical science basis. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Orr JC, et al. 2005. Anthropogenic ocean acidification over the twenty-first century and its impact on calcifying organisms. Nature 437, 681–686. ( 10.1038/nature04095) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Cao L, Caldeira K, Jain AK. 2007. Effects of carbon dioxide and climate change on ocean acidification and carbonate mineral saturation. Geophys. Res. Lett. 34, L05607 ( 10.1029/2006gl028605) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Kroeker KJ, Kordas RL, Crim R, Hendriks IE, Ramajo L, Singh GS, Duarte CM, Gattuso J-P. 2013. Impacts of ocean acidification on marine organisms: quantifying sensitivities and interaction with warming. Glob. Change Biol. 19, 1884–1896. ( 10.1111/gcb.12179) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Coleman D, Byrne M, Davis A. 2014. Molluscs on acid: gastropod shell repair and strength in acidifying oceans. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 509, 203–211. ( 10.3354/meps10887) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Fabry VJ, Seibel BA, Feely RA, Orr JC. 2008. Impacts of ocean acidification on marine fauna and ecosystem processes. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 65, 414–432. ( 10.1093/icesjms/fsn048) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Ries JB, Cohen AL, McCorkle DC. 2009. Marine calcifiers exhibit mixed responses to CO2-induced ocean acidification. Geology 37, 1131–1134. ( 10.1130/g30210a.1) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Lombardi C, Gambi MC, Vasapollo C, Taylor P, Cocito S. 2011. Skeletal alterations and polymorphism in a Mediterranean bryozoan at natural CO2 vents. Zoomorphology 130, 135–145. ( 10.1007/s00435-011-0127-y) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Cross EL, Harper EM, Peck LS. 2018. A 120-year record of resilience to environmental change in brachiopods. Glob. Change Biol. 24, 2262–2271. ( 10.1111/gcb.14085) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Nienhuis S, Palmer AR, Harley CDG. 2010. Elevated CO2 affects shell dissolution rate but not calcification rate in a marine snail. Proc. R. Soc. B 277, 2553–2558. ( 10.1098/rspb.2010.0206) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Tunnicliffe V, Davies KTA, Butterfield DA, Embley RW, Rose JM, Chadwick WW Jr. 2009. Survival of mussels in extremely acidic waters on a submarine volcano. Nat. Geosci. 2, 344–348. ( 10.1038/ngeo500) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Watson S-A, Morley SA, Peck LS. 2017. Latitudinal trends in shell production cost from the tropics to the poles. Sci. Adv. 3, e1701362 ( 10.1126/sciadv.1701362) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Gize AP. 1990. H. A. Lowenstam and S. Weiner On Biomineralization. New York and London (Oxford Univ. Press), 1989. 336 pp. Mineral. Mag. 54, 344–345. ( 10.1180/minmag.1990.054.375.22) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Cuif J-P, Dauphin Y, Howard L, Nouet J, Rouzière S, Salomé M. 2011. Is the pearl layer a reversed shell? A re-examination of the theory of pearl formation through physical characterizations of pearl and shell developmental stages in Pinctada margaritifera . Aquat. Living Resour. 24, 411–424. ( 10.1051/alr/2011149) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Harper EM. 2000. Are calcitic layers an effective adaptation against shell dissolution in the Bivalvia? J. Zool. 251, 179–186. ( 10.1111/j.1469-7998.2000.tb00602.x) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Taylor JD, Layman M. 1972. The mechanical properties of bivalve (Mollusca) shell structures. Palaeontology 15, 73–87. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Gabriel J. 1981. Differing resistance of various mollusc shell materials to simulated whelk attack . J. Zool. 194, 363–369. ( 10.1111/j.1469-7998.1981.tb04587.x) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Kaehler S, McQuaid CD. 1999. Lethal and sub-lethal effects of phototrophic endoliths attacking the shell of the intertidal mussel Perna perna. Mar. Biol. 135, 497–503. ( 10.1007/s002270050650) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Morse JW, Mucci A, Millero FJ. 1980. The solubility of calcite and aragonite in seawater of 35% salinity at 25°C and atmospheric pressure. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 44, 85–94. ( 10.1016/0016-7037(80)90178-7) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Mucci A. 1983. The solubility of calcite and aragonite in seawater at various salinities, temperatures, and one atmosphere total pressure. Am. J. Sci. 283, 780–799. ( 10.2475/ajs.283.7.780) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Smith ME, Knauss KG, Higgins SR. 2013. Effects of crystal orientation on the dissolution of calcite by chemical and microscopic analysis. Chem. Geol. 360–361, 10–21. ( 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2013.09.015) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Bischoff WD, Mackenzie FT, Bishop FC. 1987. Stabilities of synthetic magnesian calcites in aqueous solution: comparison with biogenic materials. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 51, 1413–1423. ( 10.1016/0016-7037(87)90325-5) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Baur B. 1995. Vermeij, G. J. 1993 A Natural History of Shells. Princeton University Press, Princeton, 207 pp. ISBN: 0-691-08596-X. J. Evol. Biol. 8, 536 ( 10.1046/j.1420-9101.1995.8040536.x) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Glover CP, Kidwell SM. 1993. Influence of organic matrix on the post-mortem destruction of molluscan shells. J. Geol. 101, 729–747. ( 10.1086/648271) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Peck LS, Clark MS, Power D, Reis J, Batista FM, Harper EM. 2015. Acidification effects on biofouling communities: winners and losers. Glob. Change Biol. 21, 1907–1913. ( 10.1111/gcb.12841) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Bieler R, et al. 2014. Investigating the bivalve tree of life—an exemplar-based approach combining molecular and novel morphological characters. Invertebr. Syst. 28, 32 ( 10.1071/is13010) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Checa A, Salas C. 2017. Treatise Online no. 93: Part N, Revised, Volume 1, Chapter 3: Periostracum and shell formation in the Bivalvia. Treatise Online 93, 1–51. ( 10.17161/to.v0i0.6650) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Al-Sawalmih A, Li C, Siegel S, Fabritius H, Yi S, Raabe D, Fratzl P, Paris O. 2008. Microtexture and chitin/calcite orientation relationship in the mineralized exoskeleton of the American lobster . Adv. Funct. Mater. 18, 3307–3314. ( 10.1002/adfm.200800520) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Freer A, Greenwood D, Chung P, Pannell CL, Cusack M. 2010. Aragonite prism−nacre interface in freshwater mussels Anodonta anatina (Linnaeus, 1758) and Anodonta cygnea (L. 1758). Cryst. Growth Des. 10, 344–347. ( 10.1021/cg901265x) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Trinkler N, Bardeau J, Marin F, Labonne M, Jolivet A, Crassous P, Paillard C. 2011. Mineral phase in shell repair of Manila clam Venerupis philippinarum affected by brown ring disease. Dis. Aquat. Organ. 93, 149–162. ( 10.3354/dao02288) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Scurr DJ, Eichhorn SJ. 2011. Fracture of Ensis siliqua mollusk shell reveals multiple delaminations as a potential defence and toughening mechanism. J. Mater. Sci. 46, 4719–4722. ( 10.1007/s10853-011-5492-x) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Stemmer K, Nehrke G, Brey T. 2013. Elevated CO2 levels do not affect the shell structure of the bivalve Arctica islandica from the Western Baltic. PLoS ONE 8, e70106 ( 10.1371/journal.pone.0070106) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Lv J, Jiang Y, Zhang D. 2015. Structural and mechanical characterization of Atrina pectinata and freshwater mussel shells. J. Bionic Eng. 12, 276–284. ( 10.1016/s1672-6529(14)60120-7) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Checa AG, Pina CM, Osuna-Mascaró AJ, Rodríguez-Navarro AB, Harper EM. 2014. Crystalline organization of the fibrous prismatic calcitic layer of the Mediterranean mussel Mytilus galloprovincialis. Eur. J. Mineral. 26, 495–505. ( 10.1127/0935-1221/2014/0026-2374) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Grefsrud ES, Dauphin Y, Cuif J-P, Denis A, Strand Ø. 2008. Modifications in microstructure of cultured and wild scallop shells (Pecten maximus). J. Shellfish Res. 27, 633–641. ( 10.2983/0730-8000(2008)27633:mimoca]2.0.co;2) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Harper EM, Checa AG, Rodríguez-Navarro AB. 2009. Organization and mode of secretion of the granular prismatic microstructure of Entodesma navicula (Bivalvia: Mollusca). Acta Zool. 90, 132–141. ( 10.1111/j.1463-6395.2008.00338.x) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Almagro Í, Drzymała P, Rodríguez-Navarro AB, Sainz-Díaz CI, Willinger MG, Bonarski J, Checa AG. 2015. Crystallography and textural aspects of crossed lamellar layers in Arcidae (Bivalvia, Mollusca) shells. Key Eng. Mater. 672, 60–70. ( 10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.672.60) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Lemasson AJ, Hall-Spencer JM, Kuri V, Knights AM. 2018. Changes in the biochemical and nutrient composition of seafood due to ocean acidification and warming. Mar. Environ. Res. 143, 82–92. ( 10.1016/j.marenvres.2018.11.006) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Kennish MJ, Lutz RA. 1999. Calcium carbonate dissolution rates in deep-sea bivalve shells on the East Pacific Rise at 21°N: results of an 8-year in-situ experiment. Palaeogeogr., Palaeoclimatol., Palaeoecol. 154, 293–299. ( 10.1016/s0031-0182(99)00102-9) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Freitas PS, Clarke LJ, Kennedy H, Richardson CA. 2009. Ion microprobe assessment of the heterogeneity of Mg/Ca, Sr/Ca and Mn/Ca ratios in Pecten maximus and Mytilus edulis (bivalvia) shell calcite precipitated at constant temperature. Biogeosciences 6, 1209–1227. ( 10.5194/bg-6-1209-2009) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Araujo R, Delvene G, Munt M. 2014. Presence of organic layers in shells of fossil and recent Unionoida (Bivalvia) and their implications. J. Mollusc. Stud. 80, 74–83. ( 10.1093/mollus/eyt048) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Hall-Spencer JM, Rodolfo-Metalpa R, Martin S, Ransome E, Fine M, Turner SM, Rowley SJ, Tedesco D, Buia M-C. 2008. Volcanic carbon dioxide vents show ecosystem effects of ocean acidification . Nature 454, 96–99. ( 10.1038/nature07051) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Peck VL, Tarling GA, Manno C, Harper EM, Tynan E. 2016. Outer organic layer and internal repair mechanism protects pteropod Limacina helicina from ocean acidification. Deep Sea Res. II 127, 41–52. ( 10.1016/j.dsr2.2015.12.005) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Taylor JD, Reid DG. 1990. Shell microstructure and mineralogy of the Littorinidae: ecological and evolutionary significance. Hydrobiologia 193, 199–215. ( 10.1007/bf00028077) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Harper EM, Palmer TJ, Alphey JR. 1997. RAPID COMMUNICATION: Evolutionary response by bivalves to changing Phanerozoic sea-water chemistry. Geol. Mag. 134, 403–407. ( 10.1017/s0016756897007061) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Klompmaker AA, Portell RW, Frick MG. 2017. Comparative experimental taphonomy of eight marine arthropods indicates distinct differences in preservation potential. Palaeontology 60, 773–794. ( 10.1111/pala.12314) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Martin S, Gattuso J-P. 2009. Response of Mediterranean coralline algae to ocean acidification and elevated temperature. Glob. Change Biol. 15, 2089–2100. ( 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2009.01874.x) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Checa AG, Okamoto T, Ramirez J. 2006. Organization pattern of nacre in Pteriidae (Bivalvia: Mollusca) explained by crystal competition. Proc. R. Soc. B 273, 1329–1337. ( 10.1098/rspb.2005.3460) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Chadwick M, Harper EM, Lemasson A, Spicer JI, Peck LS. 2019. Data from: Quantifying susceptibility of marine invertebrate biocomposites to dissolution in reduced pH Dryad Digital Repository. ( 10.5061/dryad.mm05699) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Citations

  1. Chadwick M, Harper EM, Lemasson A, Spicer JI, Peck LS. 2019. Data from: Quantifying susceptibility of marine invertebrate biocomposites to dissolution in reduced pH Dryad Digital Repository. ( 10.5061/dryad.mm05699) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Supplementary Materials

Mesocosm Environmental Data and TA Methodology
rsos190252supp1.docx (193.3KB, docx)
Reviewer comments
Statistical Analysis
rsos190252supp2.docx (24.8KB, docx)

Data Availability Statement

Data (values for microstructural characteristics (mineralogy, crystal density, organic content, Mg/Ca ratio) and thickness loss under both pH treatments (ambient and reduced)) are available from the Dryad Digital Repository at: https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.mm05699 [49].


Articles from Royal Society Open Science are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES