Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences logoLink to Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences
. 2019 Feb 20;26(5):979–984. doi: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2019.02.009

Bioaccumulation of heavy metals in Channa punctatus (Bloch) in river Ramganga (U.P.), India

Robeena Sarah a, Baby Tabassum a,⁎, Nida Idrees a, Abeer Hashem b,c, Elsayed Fathi Abd_Allah d
PMCID: PMC6600791  PMID: 31303828

Abstract

Ganga is the largest riverine system of India with a fragile ecosystem. Its prone to anthropogenic disturbances because of its cultural, economic and environmental values. The contamination of river Ganga by heavy metals (HM) is due to biotic (anthropogenic sources) and abiotic (pesticides, fertilizers) sources that poses a devastating health hazard to human, plant and edible fish life. The chemical analysis with the help of atomic absorption spectrometer performed on its water samples demonstrated the accumulation of heavy metals such as Arsenic (As), Lead (Pb), Cadmium (Cd), Iron (Fe), Zinc (Zn). Moreover, the spectrophotometric analysis indicated clearly the accumulation of heavy metals in order of occurrence (Fe > As > Cd > Zn > Pb) in liver and (Zn > Fe > As > Cd > Pb) in kidney of edible fish Channa punctatus. The present study has be used to sensitively monitor the extent of heavy metals pollution in the biotic aqua life of river Ramganga system and its suggested that the bioaccumulation of heavy metal in Channa punctatus has reached above permissible limits for human consumption, indicating potential health risks. Necessary biological steps should be taken to handle such food pollution and prevent the environmental risk and food chain disruption.

Keywords: Bioaccumulation of heavy metals; Channa punctatus; Ramganga River, India

1. Introduction

Water is essential for all forms of life. Clean, clear & odorless freshwater used for drinking and other domestic purposes is the gift from the nature. From the entire water reserve of the earth, approximately 97% of water consists of seas and oceans while as freshwater resources contribute only 3% of water (Shrestha et al., 2017). from the earth’s freshwater which is locked up in glaciers and ice caps on poles, 30.1% is groundwater (Adhikari and Mal, 2019). In India, the major source of water used for drinking purposes and domestic needs is the Groundwater. Life cannot be sustained more than few days without water, while an inadequate supply of water may change the pattern of distribution of organisms as well as of human beings. But due to anthropogenic activities, the water necessary for our survival is becoming hazardous every day (Rao et al., 2018).

Ganga is the well-developed largest riverine system of India and the fifth longest in the world (Mukherjee and Pal, 2018, Sahu et al., 2018). It has several important cultural, economical and environmental values and provides water for approximately to 450 million people. Moreover, Ganga River is being used for fishing and aquaculture Gupta et al., 2018). Fishes in addition to its important source of protein have rich contents of essential minerals, vitamins and unsaturated fatty acids (Medeiros et al., 2012). They can normally accumulate heavy metals from food, water and sediments as they are situated at the top of aquatic food chain (Afshan et al., 2014). Due to rapid industrialization, this river is being continuously degrading due to direct discharge of industrial wastes, agricultural run-off and anthropogenic activity along the river bank (Jani et al., 2018). These wastes contain health hazard chemicals like salts of chromium, copper, cadmium, arsenic, mercury and lead which interact with aquatic environment and affect the river ecosystem (Usmani and Kumar, 2017, Singh et al., 2017, Singh et al., 2018a, Singh et al., 2018b). Heavy metals containing pollutants besides poses serious water pollution problem due to their toxicity, persistence and bioaccumulation, also accumulate in tissues of plants and animals leading to toxicity in aquatic biota (Chopra et al., 2011, Pandey et al., 2014). Fishes and humans being the top consumers in aquatic ecosystem and food chain are badly affected through the accumulation of these heavy metals (Afshan et al., 2014). Heavy metals are the metallic elements which are dense and heavy and are present in trace amounts (Singh et al., 2018a, Singh et al., 2018b). Heavy metals lead to alteration in physical, chemical & biological properties of water bodies (Gupta et al., 2016, Ahmad et al., 2019) as well as that of its ecosystem (Dudani et al., 2017, Sharma, 2019). Heavy metals thus discharged from the source, leach into underground waters, deposits in the aquifer, or are washed away by run-off into surface waters. Industrial wastes containing heavy metals on entering aquatic environment causes biochemical disturbances in the fish (Ansah et al., 2019, Varol and Sünbül, 2019).

The concentrations of heavy metals in aquatic environment and its organisms have been of considerable interest to understand because of their toxic effects (Wani et al., 2017, Satapathy and Panda, 2018). Over the last few decades, there has been growing interest in determining heavy metal concentration in the aquatic environment and its measurement of contamination levels in public food supplies, especially fishes (Velusamy et al., 2014, Fatima et al., 2015, Arulkumar et al., 2017, Pal and Maiti, 2018, Kumari et al., 2018).

The aim of this study was to evaluate the concentrations of heavy metals i.e. Fe, Zn, Cd and Pb in surface water of river Ramganga as well as groundwater of nearby regions and its influence on the tissues of inhabiting fresh water teleost fish, Channa punctatus. Further, their hazardous levels were compared with available certified safety guidelines proposed by World Health Organization (WHO) and Food and Agricultural Organization (FAO) for human consumption C. punctatus was selected in this experiment for bio-monitoring the concentration of heavy metals in this region because of its hardy nature, high nutritional value and its round the year availability.

2. Material and methods

2.1. Description of study area

The study area was River Ramganga located in district Moradabad, Utter Pradesh, India (Fig. 1A, Fig. 1B, Fig. 2, Fig. 3). The study was conducting at five different locations of the river and the nearby regions as described clearly in Fig. 1A, Fig. 1B. The selection was based on the severe anthropogenic activities like brass industries which is continuously discharging their effluents into the river and waste scrapping and illegal cremation of the dead bodies by the local people of Katghar, Jama Masjid and it nearby regions. Such activities have increased the concentration of heavy metals in the surface water as well as groundwater. These areas also received the domestic waste water of adjacent communities living therein..

Fig. 1A.

Fig. 1A

Open in a new tab

Google map showing the locations of sampling areas.

Fig. 1B.

Fig. 1B

Open in a new tab

Area near river Ramganga in Moradabad (UP), India.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Open in a new tab

Comparison of obtained values of heavy metals with max. permissible limit of W.H.O. (2011) and B.I.S. Fe, Iron; Cd, Cadmium; Ph, Lead; Zn, Zinc; As, Arsenic.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Open in a new tab

Bioaccumulation factor of heavy metals in liver and kidney of C. punctatus. Values are expressed in mg/kg.

2.2. Collection of samples

Water samples (five per each location) were collected in the month of September and October (2017) from the river and the nearby regions. One liter sterilized bottles were used to collect water samples for heavy metal analysis. The six-medium sized fresh water fish, (Channa punctatus) samples (five for each location) were collected with the help of local fisherman from the affected regions.

2.3. Sample preparation for heavy metal analysis

Water samples collected were filtered and acidified with Nitric acid and stored for heavy metal analysis. These six medium sized fish samples were sacrificed and the main target organ was removed. Fish tissue samples were dried at 105 °C and powdered using porcelain pestle and a mortar. Weighted amount of dried tissues was digested with a mixture of nitric acid and perchloric acid in the ratio of 3:1. Digested samples were then filtered with whatman filter paper and made up to 25.0 ml with metal free double distilled water (Tabassum et al., 2016). The metals in fish and water samples were analyzed using Atomic Absorption Spectrometer and results are expressed in μg/g (for tissue samples) and mg/L (for water samples).

2.4. Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis of the five-sampled data was done analysis variance (ANOVA) using a statistical package, SPSS 22.0 (IBM Corporation, Chicago, IL, USA). The significance of the results was ascertained at P < 0.05.

3. Results

3.1. Heavy metals in water

The heavy metals detected in water were in the decreasing order Fe > Zn > Pb > As > Cd. The values of Fe, As, Cd and Pb detected was more than the maximum permissible limit when compared with the National and International Organizations like B.I.S and W.H.O respectively while that of Zn was under the permissible limit. Hence, water is not suitable for fish and human consumption. Results shown in Table 1 depicts the range, mean and standard deviation of heavy metal content in water whereas Table 2 shows the comparison of obtained values of water samples with W.H.O. and B.I.S. values (Fig. 2).

Table 1.

Bioaccumulation of Heavy metals content (ug/L) in Water samples where.

Heavy Metals (ug/ L) Range Mean ± S.D. S.E.
Fe 2.04 1.707 ± 0.74 0.33
Cd 0.14 0.101 ± 0.05 0.02
Pb 0.89 0.613 ± 0.33 0.19
Zn 2.49 1.384 ± 0.82 0.36
As 0.13 0.111 ± 0.06 0.04
LSD at 0.05 0.04 0.17
Open in a new tab

Fe, Iron; Cd, Cadmium; Ph, Lead; Zn, Zinc; As, Arsenic; SD: Standard Deviation; S.E: Standard Error.

Table 2.

Comparison of obtained values with Max. Permissible limit of W.H.O. and B.I.S.

Permissible limit of heavy metals (mg/L)
Heavy Metals Conc. In water W.H.O. limit B.I.S. limit
Fe 1.707 0.3 1
Cd 0.101 0.003 0.01
Pb 0.408 0.01 0.05
Zn 1.384 3 5
As 0.111 0.01 0.05
LSD at 0.05 0.05 0.01 0.02
Open in a new tab

Fe, Iron; Cd, Cadmium; Ph, Lead; Zn, Zinc; As, Arsenic; W.H.O, World Health Organization; B.I.S., Bureau of Indian Standard.

3.2. Bioaccumulation Factor (BAF)

Bioaccumulation Factor (BAF) is calculated as the ratio of concentration of a pollutant (heavy metal) accumulated in the tissue of an organism with respect to the concentration of that pollutant i.e. heavy metal in water body (Authman and Abbas, 2007). The order of bioaccumulation in fish liver was Fe > As > Cd > Zn > Pb while that in kidney Zn > Fe > As > Cd > Pb (Table 3). The values observed during the present study when compared with the recommended values for heavy metals i.e. Fe, Zn and Pb were found to be under the Maximum Permissible Limit (MPL) of WHO, 1985, FEPA, 1991 while that of Cadmium is found to be 0.2 mg/kg and Arsenic is above 0.26 mg/kg recommended maximum permissible limit (Fig. 3). Hence, the results suggested that Arsenic and Cadmium has been accumulating in the tissues of fish inhabiting river Ramganga.

Table 3.

Bioaccumulation Factor (BAF) of heavy metals in C. punctatus tissue samples.

Tissues Bioaccumulation Factor (BAF) of heavy metals (ug/g)
Fe Cd Pb Zn As
Liver 2.087 0.514 0.075 0.427 0.590
Kidney 0.987 0.336 0.299 1.392 0.747
LSD at 0.05 0.46 0.07 0.03 0.24 0.08
Open in a new tab

Fe, Iron; Cd, Cadmium; Ph, Lead; Zn, Zinc; As, Arsenic.

4. Discussion

Presence of heavy metals in the environment can cause serious problems to all organisms and its bioaccumulation in the food chain can be highly dangerous to human health (Devi and Yadav, 2018, Adimalla and Wang, 2018, Ahmed et al., 2019). It can also possible that environmental toxicants may increase the susceptibility of aquatic animals to various diseases by interfering with the normal functioning of their immune, reproductive and developmental processes (Rezvanfar et al., 2016, Sang et al., 2018). Concentration of heavy metals in different tissues/organs of fishes is directly influenced by contamination in aquatic environment, its up-take, regulation and elimination inside the fish body (Yang et al., 2016, Brraich and Kaur, 2017). Fish have ability to concentrate metals in their muscles (Zhaoa et al., 2018, Juncos et al., 2019) and as they are a part of human nutrition. They need to be carefully screened to ensure unnecessary high level of these toxic trace metals which were transferred to man through its consumption (Sang et al., 2018). The content of these toxic heavy metals can counteract their beneficial effects and can lead to several adverse effects to human health (Castro-González and Méndez-Armenta, 2008). A known biological function indicates that Cadmium does not break down in the environment, remain in fish body for long periods of time and can bio-accumulate for many years after its exposure to low levels (Wang et al., 2018, Markowicz et al., 2019). Kwaansa-Ansah et al., (2019), proved that the fish liver is the target organ for Fe. Respiratory disruption due to physical clogging of the gills is suggested as a possible mechanism for iron toxicity (Wani et. al, 2017).

Aquatic organisms have tendency to accumulate lead from water and diet, although there is evidence that origin of lead accumulation in fish, is most probably from contaminated water rather than that of diet (Velusamy et al., 2014, Dudani et al., 2017, Ahmed et al., 2019).

The aquatic ecosystem is contaminated by arsenicals and their effect on the aquatic organisms has now emerged as a serious threat to environment (Chopra et al., 2011, Gupta et al., 2016, Dudani et al., 2017). Aquatic ecosystem is too complex and hence indicators are useful for its effective bio-monitoring. The environmental monitoring programmes were evolved to measure impact of stress inducers on aquatic fauna (Chopra et al., 2011). Fish is a useful bio-indicator for the determination of heavy metal pollution in aquatic ecosystems Al Sayegh Petkovšek et al., 2011). Pal et al., 2014, Punetha et al., 2015 found that Moradabad district also had high concentrations of Cd in its water samples because these areas are densely populated, industrialized and are hubs of electronic industries, so the possibility of Cadmium accumulation is high in this region.

5. Conclusion

The purpose of this investigation is to detect the concentration of heavy metals i.e. Fe, Cd, As, Pb and Zn in river Ramganga of district Moradabad, Uttar Pradesh (India). Results showed that the river is highly contaminated with heavy metals accumulated in water as well as fish. The values of Fe, As, Cd and Pb detected was more than the maximum permissible limit when compared with the National and International Organizations like B.I.S and W.H.O respectively while that of Zn is under the permissible limit. As we know that Moradabad is a famous city for its brass work. The cause of such accumulation is mainly due to illegal dumping of wastes from various small-scale industries, scrapping and illegal burning of wastes near the banks of the river. Hence, water is not suitable for fish and human consumption. On the other hand, Fe, Zn and Pb were found to be under the Maximum Permissible Limit (MPL) of WHO, 1985, FEPA, 1991 in fish tissue samples while that of Cd and As is above the MPL range. Therefore, results suggested that Cadmium and Arsenic is accumulating in the tissues of fish through contaminated river water and thus, it might be transferring via food chain to humans. So it is necessary to monitor the quality of water at regular intervals and more research work is needed to find suitable eco-friendly and cheaper antagonist of heavy metal pollution.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

“All applicable international, national, and/or institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed by the authors.”

Acknowledgment

The authors would like to extend their sincere appreciation to the Deanship of Scientific Research at king Saud University for its funding this Research group NO (RG-1435-014).

Footnotes

Peer review under responsibility of King Saud University.

References

  1. Adhikari Kalyan, Mal Ujjal. Application of multivariate statistics in the analysis of groundwater geochemistry in and around the open cast coal mines of Barjora block, Bankura district, West Bengal, India. Environ. Earth Sci. 2019;78(3) [Google Scholar]
  2. Adimalla N., Wang H. Distribution, contamination, and health risk assessment of heavy metals in surface soils from northern Telangana India. Arabian J. Geosci. 2018;11:684. [Google Scholar]
  3. Afshan S., Ali S., Ameen U.S., Farid M., Bharwana S.A., Hannan F., Ahmad R. Effect of Different Heavy Metal Pollution on Fish. Res. J. Chem. Environ. Sci. 2014;2:35–40. http://www.aelsindia.com/rjcesapril2014/4.pdf [Google Scholar]
  4. Ahmad R., Kaushik H., Ranjan R.K. Assessment of microbial communities and heavy metals in urban soils of Patna, Bihar (India) Arabian J. Geosci. 2019;12:20. [Google Scholar]
  5. Ahmed S., Khurshid S., Qureshi F., Hussain A., Bhattacharya A. Heavy metals and geo-accumulation index development for groundwater of Mathura city, Uttar Pradesh. Desal. Water Treat. J. 2019;138:291–300. [Google Scholar]
  6. Al Sayegh Petkovšek S., Mazej Grudnik Z., Pokorny B. Heavy metals and arsenic concentrations in ten fish species from the Šalek lakes (Slovenia): assessment of potential human health risk due to fish consumption. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2012;184(5):2647–2662. doi: 10.1007/s10661-011-2141-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Ansah K.E.E., Nkrumah D., Nti S.O., Opoku F. Adsorption of heavy metals (Cu, Mn, Fe and Ni) from surface water using Oreochromis niloticus scales. Pollution. 2019;5(1):115–122. [Google Scholar]
  8. Arulkumar A., Paramasivam S., Rajaram R. Toxic heavy metals in commercially important food fishes collected from Palk Bay, Southeastern India. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2017;119:454–459. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2017.03.045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Authman M.M.N., Abbas H.H.H. Accumulation and distribution of copper and zinc in both water and some vital tissues of two fish species (Tilapia zillii and Mugil cephalus) of Lake Qarun, Fayoum Province Egypt. Pakistan J. Biol. Sci. 2007;10:2106–2122. doi: 10.3923/pjbs.2007.2106.2122. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Brraich O.S., Kaur M. Histopathological alterations in the gills of Labeo rohita (Hamilton-Buchanan) due to lead toxicity. Indian J. Exp. Biol. 2017;55(8):576–583. http://nopr.niscair.res.in/handle/123456789/42552 [Google Scholar]
  11. Castro-González M.I., Méndez-Armenta M. Heavy metals: Implications associated to fish consumption. Environ. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2008;26:263–271. doi: 10.1016/j.etap.2008.06.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Chopra A.K., Sharma M.K., Chamoli S. Bioaccumulation of organochlorine pesticides in aquatic system-an overview. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2011;173:905–916. doi: 10.1007/s10661-010-1433-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Devi N.L., Yadav I.C. Chemometric evaluation of heavy metal pollutions in Patna region of the Ganges alluvial plain, India: implication for source apportionment and health risk assessment. Environ. Geochem. Health. 2018;40(6):2343–2358. doi: 10.1007/s10653-018-0101-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Dudani S.N., Lakhmapurkar J., Gavali D., Patel T. Heavy metal accumulation in the mangrove ecosystem of south Gujarat coast, India. Turkish J. Fish. Aquatic Sci. 2017;17:755–766. [Google Scholar]
  15. Fatima M., Usmani N., Firdaus F., Zafeer M.F., Ahmad S., Akhtar K., Husain S.M.D., Ahmad M.H., Anis E., Hossain M.M. In vivo induction of antioxidant response and oxidative stress associated with genotoxicity and histopathological alteration in two commercial fish species due to heavy metals exposure in northern India (Kali) river. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 2015;176–177:17–30. doi: 10.1016/j.cbpc.2015.07.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Federal Environmental Protection Agency (FEPA) Act Guidelines and Standards for Industrial Effluent, Gaseous Emissions and Hazardous Waste Management in Nigeria. Supplement to Official Gazette Extraordinary - Part B. 1991;78(42):B15–B31. [Google Scholar]
  17. Gupta A., Bhatnagar P., Bakre P.P. Physicochemical properties of water and heavy metals (lead and zinc) in water and sediment of a reservoir and drainage of Jaipur (Rajasthan) – a comparative study. Int. J. Fish. Aquatic Studies 2016. 2016;4(5):407–412. http://www.fisheriesjournal.com/archives/2016/vol4issue5/PartF/4-5-6-979.pdf [Google Scholar]
  18. Gupta D., Dwivedi A.K., Tripathi M. Taxonomic validation of five fish species of subfamily Barbinae from the Ganga river system of northern India using traditional and truss analyses. PLoS One. 2018;13(10):e0206031. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0206031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Jani K., Ghattargi V., Pawar S., Inamdar M., Shouche Y., Sharma A. Anthropogenic activities induce depletion in microbial communities at Urban sites of the River Ganges. Curr. Microbiol. 2018;75:79–83. doi: 10.1007/s00284-017-1352-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Juncos R., Arcagni M., Squadrone S., Rizzoa A., Arribérea M., Barriga J.P., Battinie M.A., Campbellf L.M., Brizioc P., Abetec M.C., Guevara S.R. Interspecific differences in the bioaccumulation of arsenic of three Patagonian top predator fish: organ distribution and arsenic speciation. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2019;168:431–442. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2018.10.077. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Kumari P., Chowdhury A., Maiti S.K. Assessment of heavy metal in the water, sediment, and two edible fish species of Jamshedpur Urban Agglomeration, India with special emphasis on human health risk. Hum. Ecol. Risk Assess.: Int. J. 2018;24(6):1477–1500. [Google Scholar]
  22. Kwaansa-Ansah E.E., Nkrumah D., Nti S.O., Opoku F. Adsorption of heavy metals (Cu, Mn, Fe and Ni) from surface water using Oreochromis niloticus Scales. Pollution. 2019;5(1):115–122. [Google Scholar]
  23. Markowicz F., Król G., Szymańska-Pulikowska A. Biodegradable package-innovative purpose or source of the problem. J. Ecol. Eng. 2019;20(1):228–237. doi: 10.12911/22998993/94585. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  24. Medeiros R.J., dos Santos L.M., Freire A.S., Santelli R.E., Braga A.M.C.B., Krauss T.M. Determination of inorganic trace elements in edible marine fish from Rio de Janeiro State. Brazil Food Control. 2012;23:535–541. [Google Scholar]
  25. Mukherjee K., Pal S. Channel migration zone mapping of the River Ganga in the Diara surrounding region of Eastern India. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 2018;20:2181–2203. [Google Scholar]
  26. Pal R., Gupta M.A., Tripathi A. Assessment of heavy metals in suspended particulate matter in Moradabad, India. J. Environ. Biol. 2014;35:357–361. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Pal D., Maiti S.K. Seasonal variation of heavy metals in water, sediment, and highly consumed cultured fish (Labeo rohita and Labeo bata) and potential health risk assessment in aquaculture pond of the coal city, Dhanbad (India) Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2018;25:12464–12480. doi: 10.1007/s11356-018-1424-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Pandey M., Pandey A.K., Mishra A., Tripathi B.D. Assessment of metal bioaccumulation in Clarias batrachus and exposure evaluation in human. Proc. Int. Acad. Ecol. Environ. Sci. 2014;4(4):176–184. http://www.iaees.org/publications/journals/piaees/articles/2014-4(4)/metal-bioaccumulation-in-Clarias-batrachus.pdf [Google Scholar]
  29. Punetha D., Tewari G., Pande C., Kharkwal G.C., Tewari K. Investigation on heavy metal content in common grown vegetables from polluted sites of Moradabad district, India. J. Indian Chem. Soc. 2015;92(1):97–103. [Google Scholar]
  30. Rao N.S., Sunitha B., Rambabu R., Rao P.V.N., Rao P.S., Spandana B.D., Sravanthi M., Marghade D. Quality and degree of pollution of groundwater, using PIG from a rural part of Telangana State, India. Appl. Water Sci. 2018;8:227. [Google Scholar]
  31. Rezvanfar M.A., Hodjat M., Abdollahi M. Growing knowledge of using embryonic stem cells as a novel tool in developmental risk assessment of environmental toxicants. Life Sci. 2016;158:137–160. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2016.05.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Sahu S., Saha D., Shukla R.R. Sone megafan: a non-Himalayan megafan of craton origin, forming a potential groundwater reservoir in marginal parts of Ganga Basin, India. Hydrogeol. J. 2018;26:2891–2917. [Google Scholar]
  33. Sang W., Xu J., Bashir M.H., Ali S. Developmental responses of Cryptolaemus montrouzieri to heavy metals transferred across multi-trophic food chain. Chemosphere. 2018;205:690–697. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.02.073. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Satapathy S., Panda C.R. Source identification, environmental risk assessment and human health risks associated with toxic elements present in a coastal industrial environment, India. Environ. Geochem. Health. 2018;40(6):2243–2257. doi: 10.1007/s10653-018-0095-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Sharma D.S. Risk assessment and mitigation Measures on the heavy metal polluted water and sediment of the Kolleru Lake in Andhra Pradesh, India. Pollution. 2019;5(1):161–178. [Google Scholar]
  36. Shrestha N.K., Du X., Wang J. Assessing climate change impacts on fresh water resources of the Athabasca River Basin, Canada. Sci. Total Environ. 2017;601–602:425–440. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.05.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Singh H., Pandey R., Singh S.K., Shukla D.N. Assessment of heavy metal contamination in the sediment of the River Ghaghara, a major tributary of the River Ganga in Northern India. Appl. Water Sci. 2017;7:4133–4149. [Google Scholar]
  38. Singh H., Kushwaha A., Shukla D.N. Assessment of eco-environmental geochemistry of heavy metals pollution of the river Gandak, a major tributary of the river Ganga in Northern India. AIP Conf. Proc. 2018;1952:020038. [Google Scholar]
  39. Singh A.N., Shrivastava R., Mohan D., Kumar P. Assessment of spatial and temporal variations in water quality dynamics of River Ganga in Varanasi. Pollution. 2018;4(2):239–250. [Google Scholar]
  40. Tabassum B., Bajaj P., Sarah R. Accumulation of arsenic induced by E-waste in fresh water fish, Channa Punctatus. BAOJ Biotechnology. 2016;2(3):019. https://bioaccent.org/biotechnology/biotechnology19.pdf [Google Scholar]
  41. Usmani Z., Kumar V. Metal bioaccumulation in tissues of Puntius sarana and Labeo rohita and its associated risk status: a case study of Damodar River, India. Desalin. Water Treat. 2017;76:196–211. [Google Scholar]
  42. Varol M., Sünbül M.R. Environmental contaminants in fish species from a large dam reservoir and their potential risks to human health. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2019;169:507–515. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2018.11.060. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Velusamy A., Kumar P.S., Ram A., Chinnadurai S. Bioaccumulation of heavy metals in commercially important marine fishes from Mumbai Harbor. India Marine Pollut. Bullet. 2014;81:218–224. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2014.01.049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Wang J.R., Liu G.Z., Zhang C.J. Breakdown of Fermi liquid theory in topological multi-Weyl semimetals. Phys. Rev. B. 2018;98:205113. [Google Scholar]
  45. Wani M.A., Shammi Q.J., Singh J. Evaluation of toxicity of heavy metal iron on a fresh water fish Labeorohita and its behavioural impacts. Res. J. Pharm., Biol. Chem. Sci. 2017;8(5):197–203. [Google Scholar]
  46. WHO . Vol. 5. World Health Organization; Geneva, Switzerland: 1985. (Guidelines for Drinking Water Quality). [Google Scholar]
  47. Yang Y., Ye X., He B., Liu J. Cadmium potentiates toxicity of cypermethrin in zebrafish. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2016;35(2):435–445. doi: 10.1002/etc.3200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Zhaoa H., Quana W., Bekelea T.G., Chena M., Zhanga X., Qu B. Effect of copper on the accumulation and elimination kinetics of fluoroquinolones in the zebrafish (Danio rerio) Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2018;156:135–140. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2018.03.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES