Skip to main content
Primary Care Respiratory Journal: Journal of the General Practice Airways Group logoLink to Primary Care Respiratory Journal: Journal of the General Practice Airways Group
. 2010 Nov 3;19(4):335–341. doi: 10.4104/pcrj.2010.00065

The ADMIT series - Issues in Inhalation Therapy. 6) Training tools for inhalation devices

Federico Lavorini 1,*, Mark L Levy 2, Chris Corrigan 3, Graham Crompton 4, on behalf of the ADMIT Working Group
PMCID: PMC6602267  PMID: 21049263

Abstract

Inhaled medications are the preferred therapies for patients with asthma and COPD, but their effectiveness is limited by the patient's ability to use the device properly, an issue often neglected when these medications are prescribed. Correct inhaler technique must be taught and learnt, and requires educational and motivational programs aimed at patients and healthcare providers alike. Written instructions alone are manifestly insufficient: education must include practical demonstration and periodic re-assessment and re-education, since correct technique and motivation usually deteriorate with time. Several devices are available on the market, the purpose of which is to train patients to use inhalers correctly. They are often directed at particular devices or groups of devices and/or particular critical aspects of technique. This paper reviews the devices currently available for training patients in the correct use of both pressurised metered-dose inhalers (pMDIs) and dry powder inhalers (DPIs).

Keywords: In-Check-Dial, “2Tone” trainer, Turbutest, Inhalation Manager, Mag-Flo, SmartMist, pMDI, DPI

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (787.0 KB).

Footnotes

F Lavorini has been reimbursed for attending conferences and/or giving talks by Menarini Industrie Farmaceutiche, AstraZeneca and Pfizer. He serves as a consultant to Meda AB.

ML Levy has been reimbursed for attending conferences and/or giving talks by, and has acted as a consultant for, AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, Ivax, 3M, Novartis, MSD, Altana, Meda AB, Trinity Chiesi, Boehringer Ingelheim, Ranbaxy, Innovata Biomedica and Schering Plough. He has received research grants from Ivax, Boehringer Ingelheim, GlaxoSmithKline, Schering Plough and AstraZeneca. He is the Editor-in-Chief of the PCRJ, but was not involved in the editorial review of, nor the decision to publish, this article.

C Corrigan has been reimbursed for attending conferences and/or giving talks by Schering- Plough, Allergy Therapeutics, Med AB, UCB Pharma. His department has received research grants from GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, ALK-Abello, Allergy Therapeutics. He has acted as a consultant for Meda AB, GlaxoSmithKline, MSD, Allergopharma, Joachim Ganzer AB G Crompton has given talks and acted as a consultant forMEDA AB.

Conflicts of interest for all ADMIT members are listed at the end of the first paper in this series — see Dekhuijzen et al., Prim Care Resp J 2007;16(6):341–8.


Articles from Primary Care Respiratory Journal: Journal of the General Practice Airways Group are provided here courtesy of Primary Care Respiratory Society UK/Macmillan Publishers Limited

RESOURCES