Skip to main content
Journal of Athletic Training logoLink to Journal of Athletic Training
. 2019 Apr 22;54(5):472–482. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-407-16

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury Risk in Sport: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Injury Incidence by Sex and Sport Classification

Alicia M Montalvo *, Daniel K Schneider , Kate E Webster , Laura Yut *, Marc T Galloway §, Robert S Heidt Jr §, Christopher C Kaeding , Timothy E Kremcheck , Robert A Magnussen , Shital N Parikh #, Denver T Stanfield §, Eric J Wall #, Gregory D Myer *,**,
PMCID: PMC6602364  PMID: 31009238

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate sex differences in incidence rates (IRs) of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury by sport type (collision, contact, limited contact, and noncontact).

Data Sources

A systematic review was performed using the electronic databases PubMed (1969–January 20, 2017) and EBSCOhost (CINAHL, SPORTDiscus; 1969–January 20, 2017) and the search terms anterior cruciate ligament AND injury AND (incidence OR prevalence OR epidemiology).

Study Selection

Studies were included if they provided the number of ACL injuries and the number of athlete-exposures (AEs) by sex or enough information to allow the number of ACL injuries by sex to be calculated. Studies were excluded if they were analyses of previously reported data or were not written in English.

Data Extraction

Data on sport classification, number of ACL injuries by sex, person-time in AEs for each sex, year of publication, sport, sport type, and level of play were extracted for analysis.

Data Synthesis

We conducted IR and IR ratio (IRR) meta-analyses, weighted for study size and calculated. Female and male athletes had similar ACL injury IRs for the following sport types: collision (2.10/10 000 versus 1.12/10 000 AEs, IRR = 1.14, P = .63), limited contact (0.71/10 000 versus 0.29/10 000 AEs, IRR = 1.21, P = .77), and noncontact (0.36/10 000 versus 0.21/10 000 AEs, IRR = 1.49, P = .22) sports. For contact sports, female athletes had a greater risk of injury than male athletes did (1.88/10 000 versus 0.87/10 000 AEs, IRR = 3.00, P < .001). Gymnastics and obstacle-course races were outliers with respect to IR, so we created a sport category of fixed-object, high-impact rotational landing (HIRL). For this sport type, female athletes had a greater risk of ACL injury than male athletes did (4.80/10 000 versus 1.75/10 000 AEs, IRR = 5.51, P < .001), and the overall IRs of ACL injury were greater than all IRs in all other sport categories.

Conclusions

Fixed-object HIRL sports had the highest IRs of ACL injury for both sexes. Female athletes were at greater risk of ACL injury than male athletes in contact and fixed-object HIRL sports.

Keywords: epidemiology, knee, sprain, athletes


Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury is a common and debilitating injury among athletes. It can occur from both contact and noncontact mechanisms1,2 and has a relatively high incidence in sports involving deliberate contact.1 The relationship between the amount of inherent contact in a sport and the risk of injury to the ACL is unclear, especially when including sex as a variable. In the United States, collision sports, such as football, rugby, and wrestling, are male dominated. Females play collision sports such as ice hockey and rugby, but contact sports such as soccer and basketball are more commonly cited when comparing ACL injury risk by sex. Whereas the rate of ACL injury in females playing soccer was among the highest, it was also high in limited-contact and noncontact sports, including alpine skiing and gymnastics, respectively.1,3 Hootman et al1 found some of the highest rates of ACL injury among males in collision sports (spring and fall football and wrestling). Conversely, in females, gymnastics (noncontact), followed by soccer and basketball, resulted in the highest rates of ACL injury.1

Deliberate contact during sport is believed to contribute to increased rates of ACL injury.4 However, given that many ACL injuries result from noncontact mechanisms, the role of sport type in ACL injury is uncertain. Moreover, it is unclear if a sex difference in ACL injury incidence exists when stratifying by sport type (eg, collision, full contact, limited contact, and noncontact). Therefore, the purpose of our systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare the incidence rates (IRs) of ACL injury of male and female athletes in each of the following sport types: collision, contact, limited contact, and noncontact.

METHODS

We followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses5 (PRISMA) guidelines when conducting and reporting this systematic review and meta-analysis.

Literature Search

A systematic review of the current literature was performed using the electronic databases PubMed (1969–January 20, 2017) and EBSCOhost (CINAHL and SPORTDiscus; 1969–January 20, 2017) and the following search terms: anterior cruciate ligament AND injury AND (incidence OR prevalence OR epidemiology). Results were further limited to peer-reviewed articles written in English.

In addition to the electronic search, we contacted experts in the field for further suggestions and examined references cited in review papers to identify any other relevant articles for potential inclusion. Publication details from all studies identified in the literature search were exported to bibliographic software (Endnote X7; Clarivate Analytics, Philadelphia, PA).

Selection Criteria

Given the large number of identified studies, a single author (A.M.M.) performed the initial screening of articles for inclusion. Any gray areas were discussed with the second author (D.K.S.), and any disagreements were decided by the senior author (G.D.M.). Articles were screened first by title, second by abstract, and third by full text according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. We included articles in which the total number of ACL injuries and the total number of athlete-exposures (AEs) were reported by sex and the data were provided in such a way that the number of ACL injuries by sex could be calculated. We excluded articles that included further analyses on previously reported prospective studies, were written in languages other than English, or were review papers. Full texts were retrieved when the title or abstract met the selection criteria or when the status could not be determined from the title and abstract alone.

Data Extraction and Analysis

The primary variables extracted were the sport classification, number of ACL injuries for each sex, and person-time in AEs for each sex. Sports were classified as follows: collision (contact with an opponent or object is inherent), contact (contact with an opponent or object is acceptable), limited contact (contact with an opponent or object is discouraged), and noncontact (contact with an opponent or object is unexpected; Table 1). For each sport classification, we calculated the overall ACL injury rate and separate IRs for men and women. The IR ratio (IRR) between men and women was subsequently calculated using only data from studies in which injury-risk data were reported for both men and women to allow direct comparisons. Additional extracted data included year of publication, sport, sport type, and level of play. One author (A.M.M.) recorded all pertinent data from the included articles, and another author (D.K.S.) independently reviewed those data for accuracy and completeness.

Table 1.

Sport Classification Key

Classification
Sport
Collision Boxing
Boys'/men's lacrosse
Close-quarters combat
Football
Handball
Ice hockey
Rugby
Wrestling
Contact Basketball
Field hockey
Girls'/women's lacrosse
Judo
Soccer
Limited contact Baseball
Cheerleading
Fencing
Flickerball
Floorball
Frisbee
Softball
Volleyball
Noncontact Alpine skiing
Dance/ballet
Running/track
Fixed-object high-impact rotational landing Gymnastics
Indoor obstacle-course test
Obstacle-course race

The reported person-time unit was not uniform across studies. Therefore, to establish a common metric, we tabulated AEs. When the number of player-hours was reported, the number of AEs was estimated by dividing player-hours by 2. The assumption for converting player-hours to AEs was that each AE (1 game or 1 practice) on average would last about 2 hours. In addition, not all authors reported the number of ACL injuries by sex; instead, they provided IRs by sex. For these studies, the number of AEs and the reported IRs were used to calculate the number of ACL injuries by sex (number of ACL injuries by sex = total AEs by sex × the rate numerator by sex/the rate denominator by sex).68 For studies in which the number of ACL injuries by sex could not be estimated, we e-mailed the authors to gather those data. If they did not have access to the information or did not respond, the study was excluded from the meta-analysis.915

Risk of Bias Assessment

Included studies were critically appraised independently by 2 authors (A.M.M., D.K.S.). Given that most included articles described observational cohort studies that did not include an intervention, traditional checklists were not appropriate. After a thorough search for tools to appraise observational cohort studies, we decided that the tool best suited to be used quantitatively was the Quality Assessment Tool for Observational Cohort and Cross-Sectional Studies.16 This tool, available through the National Institutes of Health (Bethesda, MD), assesses criteria such as participation rate, whether exposure data were collected before the outcome, whether the time frame was sufficient to allow for the outcome to occur, and the number of participants lost to follow-up after baseline. If a criterion was met, the item was scored as 1. If it was absent or not reported, the item was scored as zero. The maximum score possible was 14. Items were scored independently by 2 authors (A.M.M., D.K.S.). These authors discussed any discrepancies in scoring. For discrepancies that could not be resolved, a third author (G.D.M.) was consulted for arbitration. Given that the included studies with interventions were treated as cohort studies in the analyses, they were assessed with the same tool, which allowed for quality comparisons across all included studies.

Statistical Analysis

The number of included studies per analysis varied. For the total IR, any study in which authors reported the rate of either sex was included. For the IR by sex, any study in which the authors reported female or male rates was included for the respective analyses. Only studies that included both female and male athletes were used to calculate ratios. The ACL injury IR in noncontact sports comprised sports with marked differences in ACL injury IRs. Given that several outliers were present, we subdivided the category into sports that did and sports that did not include a fixed-object and high-impact landing. These latter sports were removed from the noncontact category, and a new fixed-object, high-impact rotational-landing (HIRL) category was created. Fixed-object HIRL sports were defined as noncontact sports that included high-impact landings from fixed objects, such as beams, vaults, and obstacles. Injury IRs for the individual studies were summarized in forest plots for the following groups by total, female, and male IRs: collision, contact, limited-contact, noncontact, and fixed-object HIRL sports. These rates were multiplied to calculate ACL injury IRs per 10 000 AEs in each respective group. Incidence rate ratios for women versus men were calculated for each group and summarized in forest plots.

Injury data were analyzed using R (version 3.3.2; R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria) and the R packages meta and metafor with the functions metarate for IR and metainc for IRR weighted for individual study size. When AEs but no events (ACL injuries) were present, a continuity correction was applied. The default value for the continuity correction, 0.5, was used to calculate individual point estimates and the 95% confidence interval (CI) and to conduct a meta-analysis based on the inverse variance method. We set the α level at .05.

RESULTS

The electronic literature search yielded 3774 abstracts for initial review. After duplicates were removed, a total of 1300 unique titles remained. We screened the titles and abstracts and removed 1155 articles for lack of relevance to the research. The remaining 145 articles were manually cross-referenced, and experts were consulted to identify additional relevant articles, resulting in the inclusion of 17 more articles. Full texts of these 162 articles were obtained and assessed for the inclusion and exclusion criteria. We contacted the corresponding authors of the included articles for additional information as needed. At the end of the search, 36 articles were included in the study.1,68,1748 An outline of the literature review process is presented in Figure 1. The data that were extracted for each analysis and can be used to determine which studies were included in each analysis are shown in Table 2.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Flow chart of the literature review process.

Table 2.

Data Extracted From Each Included Study Continued on Next Page

Article (y)
Sport
Classification
Level
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries
Athlete-Exposures
Female
Male
Total
Female
Male
Agel et al38 (2016) Football Collision Collegiate 0 513 513 0 3 017 647
Agel et al38 (2016) Ice hockey Collision Collegiate 3 15 18 150 000 500 000
Agel et al38 (2016) Lacrosse Collision Collegiate 0 46 46 0 353 846
Agel et al38 (2016) Wrestling Collision Collegiate 0 34 34 0 226 667
Beynnon et al17 (2014) Lacrosse Collision High school 0 7 7 0 121 583
Beynnon et al17 (2014) Lacrosse Collision Collegiate 0 6 6 0 71 731
Beynnon et al17 (2014) Football Collision High school 0 8 8 0 144 233
Beynnon et al17 (2014) Football Collision Collegiate 0 3 3 0 18 417
Beynnon et al17 (2014) Rugby Collision Collegiate 6 3 9 14 723 17 886
Brooks et al6 (2005) Rugby Collision Professional 0 2 2 0 98 205
Dallalana et al18 (2007) Rugby Collision Professional 0 9 9 0 108 920
Dragoo et al19 (2012) Football Collision Collegiate 0 318 318 0 2 222 155
Gwinn et al22 (2000) Rugby Collision Collegiate 3 4 7 8475 22 788
Gwinn et al22 (2000) Instructional wrestling Collision Amateur 1 2 3 1306 10 582
Hootman et al1 (2007) Football Collision Collegiate 0 2538 2538 0 13 142 929
Hootman et al1 (2007) Ice hockey Collision Collegiate 3 78 81 100 000 1 300 000
Hootman et al1 (2007) Lacrosse Collision Collegiate 0 131 131 0 1 091 667
Hootman et al1 (2007) Wrestling Collision Collegiate 0 147 147 0 1 336 364
Joseph et al23 (2013) Football Collision High school 0 286 286 0 2 580 637
Joseph et al23 (2013) Wrestling Collision High school 0 27 27 0 809 430
Levy et al26 (1997) Rugby Collision Collegiate 21 0 21 58 296 0
Mountcastle et al29 (2007) Ice hockey Collision Collegiate 0 2 2 0 39 587
Mountcastle et al29 (2007) Lacrosse Collision Collegiate 0 8 8 0 39 204
Mountcastle et al29 (2007) Football Collision Collegiate 0 52 52 0 223 307
Mountcastle et al29 (2007) Football Collision Amateur 1 52 53 1828 129 956
Mountcastle et al29 (2007) Wrestling Collision Collegiate 0 6 6 0 47 039
Mountcastle et al29 (2007) Wrestling Collision Amateur 0 10 10 0 149 022
Mountcastle et al29 (2007) Wrestling Collision Amateur 0 4 4 0 48 203
Mountcastle et al29 (2007) Close-quarters combat Collision Amateur 0 2 2 37 184 150 606
Mountcastle et al29 (2007) Boxing Collision Amateur 0 1 1 0 165 376
Mountcastle et al29 (2007) Boxing Collision Amateur 0 2 2 0 41 270
Mountcastle et al29 (2007) Handball Collision Amateur 4 4 8 25 090 25 090
Mountcastle et al29 (2007) Handball Collision Amateur 0 2 2 13 564 39 348
Mountcastle et al29 (2007) Rugby Collision Amateur 0 13 13 770 95 200
Mountcastle et al29 (2007) Rugby Collision Amateur 0 31 31 0 62 785
Myklebust et al44 (2003) Handball Collision Elite, subelite 69 0 69 104 468 0
Petersen et al31 (2005) Handball Collision Semiprofessional, amateur 6 0 6 11 905 0
Stanley et al39 (2016) Lacrosse Collision High school 0 22 22 0 166 667
Agel et al38 (2016) Basketball Contact Collegiate 162 70 232 736 364 875 000
Agel et al38 (2016) Field hockey Contact Collegiate 20 0 20 181 818 0
Agel et al38 (2016) Lacrosse Contact Collegiate 59 0 59 256 522 0
Agel et al38 (2016) Soccer Contact Collegiate 71 26 97 710 000 650 000
Beynnon et al17 (2014) Basketball Contact High school 6 4 10 98 296 108 622
Beynnon et al17 (2014) Basketball Contact Collegiate 5 2 7 34 882 38 927
Beynnon et al17 (2014) Soccer Contact High school 15 3 18 114 077 117 140
Beynnon et al17 (2014) Soccer Contact Collegiate 11 6 17 28 115 30 241
Beynnon et al17 (2014) Field hockey Contact Collegiate 1 0 1 25 993 0
Beynnon et al17 (2014) Field hockey Contact High school 4 0 4 82 946 0
Beynnon et al17 (2014) Lacrosse Contact High school 6 0 6 86 160 0
Beynnon et al17 (2014) Lacrosse Contact Collegiate 4 0 4 37 567 0
Faude et al40 (2005) Soccer Contact Elite 11 0 11 17 655 0
Gilchrist et al20 (2008) Soccer Contact Collegiate 25 0 25 88 139 0
Giza et al48 (2005) Soccer Contact Professional 8 0 8 177 778 0
Gomez et al21 (1996) Basketball Contact High school 11 0 11 60 376 0
Gwinn et al22 (2000) Basketball Contact Collegiate 5 1 6 10 452 11 282
Gwinn et al22 (2000) Soccer Contact Collegiate 5 1 6 6508 12 408
Gwinn et al22 (2000) Basketball Contact Amateur 0 5 5 1360 33 866
Gwinn et al22 (2000) Soccer Contact Amateur 2 10 12 742 25 462
Hägglund et al41 (2009) Soccer Contact Elite 8 8 16 27 078 35 681
Hootman et al1 (2007) Basketball Contact Collegiate 498 167 665 2 165 217 2 385 714
Hootman et al1 (2007) Field hockey Contact Collegiate 53 0 53 757 143 0
Hootman et al1 (2007) Lacrosse Contact Collegiate 145 0 145 852 941 0
Hootman et al1 (2007) Soccer Contact Collegiate 411 168 579 1 467 857 1 866 667
Joseph et al23 (2013) Soccer Contact High school 96 44 140 643 206 914 551
Joseph et al23 (2013) Basketball Contact High school 92 25 117 894 391 1 106 060
Kiani et al24 (2010) Soccer Contact Amateur 5 0 5 66 505 0
Krutsch et al42 (2016) Soccer Contact Professional and amateur 0 16 16 0 75 312
LaBella et al25 (2011) Soccer, basketball Contact High school 12 0 12 22 925 0
Le Gall et al43 (2008) Soccer Contact Elite, youth 12 0 12 48 359 0
Mandelbaum et al7 (2005) Soccer Contact Amateur 73 0 73 205 308 0
Messina et al28 (1999) Basketball Contact High school 0 4 4 0 84 943
Mountcastle et al29 (2007) Basketball Contact Collegiate 6 0 6 15 300 14 273
Mountcastle et al29 (2007) Basketball Contact Amateur 1 2 3 3438 19 483
Mountcastle et al29 (2007) Basketball Contact Amateur 2 12 14 16 896 100 409
Mountcastle et al29 (2007) Soccer Contact Collegiate 4 5 9 23 080 34 192
Mountcastle et al29 (2007) Soccer Contact Amateur 0 1 1 1810 10 261
Mountcastle et al29 (2007) Soccer Contact Amateur 1 13 14 14 382 80 124
Mountcastle et al29 (2007) Judo Contact Amateur 1 5 6 4600 29 900
Nagano et al8 (2011) Basketball Contact Elite 23 0 23 254 831 0
Östenberg and Roos45 (2000) Soccer Contact Elite 3 0 3 4839 0
Pfeiffer et al32 (2006) Basketball Contact High school 5 0 5 24 378 0
Pfeiffer et al32 (2006) Soccer Contact High school 1 0 1 15 270 0
Söderman et al46 (2000) Soccer Contact Elite 5 0 5 7017 0
Stanley et al39 (2016) Basketball Contact High school 35 12 47 289 256 363 636
Stanley et al39 (2016) Lacrosse Contact High school 32 0 32 101 266 0
Stanley et al39 (2016) Soccer Contact High school 31 19 50 173 184 208 791
Steffen et al33 (2008) Soccer Contact Amateur 9 0 9 66 574 0
Tegnander et al34 (2008) Soccer Contact Elite 2 0 2 14 810 0
Trojian and Collins35 (2006) Basketball Contact Professional 9 0 9 45 036 0
Waldén et al37(2012) Soccer Contact Amateur 21 0 21 139 149 0
Waldén et al47 (2011) Soccer Contact Professional 15 20 35 52 389 164 923
Agel et al38 (2016) Baseball Limited contact Collegiate 0 12 12 0 600 000
Agel et al38 (2016) Softball Limited contact Collegiate 33 0 33 550 000 0
Agel et al38 (2016) Volleyball Limited contact Collegiate 30 0 30 500 000 0
Beynnon et al17 (2014) Volleyball Limited contact Collegiate 1 0 1 2237 0
Hootman et al1 (2007) Baseball Limited contact Collegiate 0 56 56 0 2 800 000
Hootman et al1 (2007) Softball Limited contact Collegiate 129 0 129 1 612 500 0
Hootman et al1 (2007) Volleyball Limited contact Collegiate 142 0 142 1 577 778 0
Joseph et al23 (2013) Volleyball Limited contact High school 20 0 20 841 608 0
Joseph et al23 (2013) Baseball Limited contact High school 0 6 6 0 861 964
Joseph et al23 (2013) Softball Limited contact High school 21 0 21 657 246 0
Mountcastle et al29 (2007) Baseball Limited contact Collegiate 0 1 1 0 27 674
Mountcastle et al29 (2007) Volleyball Limited contact Collegiate 2 0 2 19 357 0
Mountcastle et al29 (2007) Volleyball Limited contact Amateur 0 2 2 6856 38 849
Mountcastle et al29 (2007) Fencing Limited contact Amateur 0 1 1 12 148 16 964
Mountcastle et al29 (2007) Cheerleading Limited contact Amateur 2 2 4 16 780 16 780
Mountcastle et al29 (2007) Flickerball Limited contact Amateur 0 2 2 5845 31 896
Mountcastle et al29 (2007) Frisbee Limited contact Amateur 0 1 1 925 4829
Pasanen et al30 (2008) Floorball Limited contact Elite 10 0 10 28 679 0
Stanley et al39 (2016) Softball Limited contact High school 1 0 1 142 857 0
Stanley et al39 (2016) Baseball Limited contact High school 0 5 5 0 208 333
Liederbach et al27 (2008) Dance Noncontact Elite 10 2 12 873 067 545 266
Mountcastle et al29 (2007) Track Noncontact Collegiate 2 0 2 76 542 114 409
Mountcastle et al29 (2007) Skiing Noncontact Amateur 1 1 2 3586 20 361
Mountcastle et al29 (2007) Parachute Noncontact Amateur 0 2 2 8402 42 300
Viola et al36 (1999) Alpine skiing Noncontact Professional 10 21 31 227 766 499 070
Agel et al38 (2016) Gymnastics High-impact rotational landing Collegiate 24 0 24 100 000 0
Gwinn et al22 (2000) Obstacle-course race High-impact rotational landing Amateur 4 3 7 650 5289
Hootman et al1 (2007) Gymnastics High-impact rotational landing Collegiate 134 0 134 406 061 0
Mountcastle et al29 (2007) Gymnastics High-impact rotational landing Collegiate 1 0 1 14 317 0
Mountcastle et al29 (2007) Gymnastics High-impact rotational landing Amateur 7 7 14 29 304 166 054
Mountcastle et al29 (2007) Obstacle-course race High-impact rotational landing Amateur 5 9 14 5323 35 630

Incidence Rates for Collision Sports by Sex

In collision sports, the total IR of ACL injury among female and male athletes combined was 1.29/10 000 AEs (95% CI = 1.07, 1.54; P < .01, I2 = 95.0%; Figure 2). The injury IR among female athletes was 2.10/10 000 AEs (95% CI = 1.12, 3.96; P < .01, I2 = 84.0%; Figure 3) and among male athletes was 1.12/10 000 AEs (95% CI = 0.94, 1.33; P < .01, I2 = 93.0%; see Supplemental Figure 1 (197.2KB, zip) , available online at http://dx.doi.org/10.4085/1062-6050-407-16.S1). We observed no difference between sexes for the ACL injury IR (IRR = 1.14; 95% CI = 0.68, 1.92, P = .63; I2 = 0%; see Supplemental Figure 2 (197.2KB, zip) ).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Forest plot for the total incidence rate of anterior cruciate ligament injury in male and female collision-sport athletes combined. a Sports are provided in Table 2. Abbreviation: CI, confidence interval.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Forest plot for the incidence rate of anterior cruciate ligament injury in female collision-sport athletes. a Sports are provided in Table 2. b We substituted 0.1 for 0 to estimate an extremely low rate that could be used in the analysis. Abbreviation: CI, confidence interval.

Incidence Rates for Contact Sports by Sex

The total IR of ACL injury in contact sports was 1.51/10 000 AEs (95% CI = 1.31, 1.75; P < .01, I2 = 90.0%; see Supplemental Figure 3 (197.2KB, zip) ). The injury IR was greater among female (1.88/10 000 AEs; 95% CI = 1.61, 2.20; P < .01, I2 = 88.0%; see Supplemental Figure 4 (197.2KB, zip) ) than among male (0.87/10 000 AEs; 95% CI = 0.69, 1.11; P < .01, I2 = 84.0%; see Supplemental Figure 5 (197.2KB, zip) ) athletes. We observed a difference between sexes for the ACL injury IR (IRR = 3.00; 95% CI = 2.70, 3.34; P < .001, I2 = 4.0%; see Supplemental Figure 6 (197.2KB, zip) ).

Incidence Rates for Limited-Contact Sports by Sex

In limited-contact sports, the total IR of ACL injury was 0.48/10 000 AEs (95% CI = 0.33, 0.70; P < .01, I2 = 91.0%; see Supplemental Figure 7 (197.2KB, zip) ). The injury IR in female athletes was 0.71/10 000 AEs (95% CI = 0.50, 1.01; P < .01, I2 = 84.0%; see Supplemental Figure 8 (197.2KB, zip) ) and in male athletes was 0.29/10 000 AEs (95% CI = 0.18, 0.48; P < .01, I2 = 63.0%; see Supplemental Figure 9 (197.2KB, zip) ). The IRR was calculated using only data from Mountcastle et al,29 as data comparing injury rates among women and men in this sport type were not available. We observed no difference between sexes for the ACL injury IR (IRR = 1.21; 95% CI = 0.35, 4.20; P = .77, I2 = 0%; see Supplemental Figure 10 (197.2KB, zip) ).

Incidence Rates for Noncontact Sports by Sex

The total IR of ACL injury in noncontact sports was 0.25/10 000 AEs (95% CI = 0.10, 0.65; P < .01, I2 = 85.0%; see Supplemental Figure 11 (197.2KB, zip) ). The ACL injury IR among female athletes was 0.36/10 000 AEs (95% CI = 0.14, 0.96; P < .01, I2 = 74.0%; see Supplemental Figure 12 (197.2KB, zip) ) and among male athletes was 0.21/10 000 AEs (95% CI = 0.07, 0.62; P < .01, I2 = 70.0%; see Supplemental Figure 13 (197.2KB, zip) ). We observed no difference between sexes (IRR = 1.49; 95% CI = 0.79, 2.79; P = .22, I2 = 0%; see Supplemental Figure 14 (197.2KB, zip) ).

Incidence Rates for Fixed-Object HIRL Sports by Sex

In fixed-object HIRL sports, the total IR of ACL injury was 2.62/10 000 AEs (95% CI = 1.44, 4.75; P < .01, I2 = 89.0%; see Supplemental Figure 15 (197.2KB, zip) ). The ACL injury IR among female athletes was 4.80/10 000 AEs (95% CI = 2.37, 9.70; P < .01, I2 = 89.0%; see Supplemental Figure 16 (197.2KB, zip) ) and among male athletes was 1.75/10 000 AEs (95% CI = 0.41, 7.48; P < .01, I2 = 89.0%; see Supplemental Figure 17 (197.2KB, zip) ). We observed a difference between sexes (IRR = 5.51; 95% CI = 2.80, 10.82; P < .001, I2 = 0%; see Supplemental Figure 18 (197.2KB, zip) ).

Risk of Bias Assessment

Most studies were of moderate quality (Table 3). Three studies fulfilled 75% or more of the criteria, and 33 studies fulfilled 50% or more of the criteria. The remaining 3 studies fulfilled fewer than 50% of the criteria and were deemed to be of low quality. Studies may have received lower scores for lack of reporting information, such as the total number of eligible individuals, how outcomes were measured, and attrition. Overall, the risk of bias was deemed to be moderate.

Table 3.

Results of Risk of Bias Assessment Using the Quality Assessment Tool for Observational Cohort and Cross-Sectional Studiesa

Study (y)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Total Present
Agel et al38 (2016) 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 9
Beynnon et al17 (2014) 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 9
Brooks et al6 (2005) 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 9
Dallalana et al18 (2007) 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 9
Dragoo et al19 (2012) 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 7
Faude et al40 (2005) 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 8
Gilchrist et al20 (2008) 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 10
Giza et al48 (2005) 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 8
Gomez et al21 (1996) 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 7
Gwinn et al22 (2000) 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 9
Hägglund et al41 (2009) 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 9
Hootman et al1 (2007) 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 8
Joseph et al23 (2013) 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 8
Kiani et al24 (2010) 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 12
Krutsch et al42 (2016) 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 8
LaBella et al25 (2011) 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 10
Le Gall et al43 (2008) 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 6
Levy et al26 (1997) 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 9
Liederbach et al27 (2008) 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 8
Mandelbaum et al7 (2005) 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 10
Messina et al28 (1999) 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 5
Mountcastle et al29 (2007) 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 9
Myklebust et al44 (2003) 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 9
Nagano et al8 (2011) 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 3
Östenberg and Roos45 (2000) 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 8
Pasanen et al30 (2008) 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 10
Petersen et al31 (2005) 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 9
Pfeiffer et al32 (2006) 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 9
Söderman et al46 (2000) 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 8
Stanley et al39 (2016) 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 8
Steffen et al33 (2008) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 13
Tegnander et al34 (2008) 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 8
Trojian and Collins35 (2006) 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 9
Viola et al36 (1999) 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 8
Waldén et al37 (2012) 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 12
Waldén et al47 (2011) 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 7
a

0 = criterion was absent or not reported; 1 = criterion was present.

DISCUSSION

The purpose of our study was to quantify sex differences in ACL injury risk for sports with various amounts of contact. Female athletes participating in contact and fixed-object HIRL sports had greater ACL injury IRs than their male counterparts. In contrast, the ACL injury IRs for collision, limited-contact, and noncontact sports did not differ between sexes. The findings from this meta-analysis support a previous report4 indicating that the amount of athlete-to-athlete contact inherent to a sport was correlated with the rate of ACL injury in both male and female athletes. However, adding the fixed-object HIRL category suggested that sports such as gymnastics and obstacle-course races may result in the highest rates of ACL injury.

Identifying the ACL injury IR associated with fixed-object HIRL sports is especially relevant as it pertains to military training and activities. Over a 7-year period, the IR of ACL injury in US military members of all services was 3.09/1000 person-years for men and 2.29/1000 person-years for women.49 Investigators49 noted that service members were at 10 times greater risk of ACL injury than the general population. This increased risk may be partially explained by participation in fixed-object HIRL activities. In contrast to our findings, Owens et al49 did not find women to be at greater risk of ACL injury than men; however, they reported person-years because they did not have exposure information. In addition, men outnumbered women in their study49 and, thus, had higher rates of ACL injury. Military service members, especially those participating in regular training that includes fixed-object HIRLs, may benefit from integrative neuromuscular training to mitigate their risk of ACL injury.

In addition to the military application, our findings related to fixed-object HIRL sports are also relevant considering the advent of recreational obstacle-course races (eg, Tough Mudder, Spartan, BattleFrog). These races are based on military training obstacle courses. Currently, no information about the rates of ACL injury associated with these races is available, but our results suggest that participants should exercise caution. For gymnastics, our findings indicated that the unique demands of the sport, including both implement-based activity and high-impact landings after full-body rotation, distinguish the sport from other noncontact sports regarding the ACL injury risk. Hootman et al1 found that football, a collision sport, resulted in the greatest incidence of ACL injuries in collegiate male athletes. Our findings indicated that fixed-object HIRL sports resulted in ACL injury IRs that were similar to those of collision sports in men (1.75/10 000 versus 1.12/10 000 AEs). The ACL injury IR was more than 3 times greater among women than among men for fixed-object HIRL sports. Considering the likely mechanisms of injury (landing with rotation, stiff-legged landing), this disparity highlights the neuromuscular deficits typically demonstrated by female athletes.50 Therefore, female athletes participating in fixed-object HIRL sports may benefit the most from preventive strategies.

We also found that female athletes participating in contact sports sustained ACL injuries at 3 times the rate of male athletes in these same sports (IRR = 3.00). These findings are similar to IRRs previously reported4 for male and female collegiate basketball and soccer players, which were approximately 3.6 and 2.8, respectively. However, ACL injury IRs did not differ between women and men for collision sports. The lack of a difference in ACL injury IRs between women and men in collision sports and between women in collision and contact sports may be partially explained by the lack of collision-sport participation by women. When participation was equal among women and men (contact sports), the greater ACL injury IR among women was evident. It is possible that not enough studies were available in which researchers investigated ACL injury incidence among both female and male collision athletes to detect a difference in the rates where one truly exists (ie, low statistical power).

In contrast, the ACL injury IRs for men in collision and contact sports differed (1.12/10 000 and 0.87/10 000 AEs, respectively). The sports included in these categories are similar because they require cutting and pivoting, which are dynamic maneuvers known to contribute to noncontact ACL injury mechanisms. Again, these combined findings further support the idea that neuromuscular deficits may contribute to the greater ACL injury IR among women. Although speculative, it was also possible that the men's decreased IR in collision sports compared with contact sports was due to direct-contact blows to the knee based on the nature of the sports.

Whereas our research may provide a robust estimate of sex differences in ACL injury IRs among sport types, it had limitations. The common metric of AE had to be estimated in some cases when exposure was provided in player-hours. This was necessary to include the maximum amount of data possible. As mentioned, we assumed that 2 player-hours were approximately equal to 1 AE, and we used this assumption to generate estimates of AEs. This assumption may have resulted in the overestimation or underestimation of exposure, depending on the sport. We used broad inclusion criteria to capture the greatest amount of information for generating these estimates. The included articles ranged in study quality, and the estimates are only as strong as the evidence on which they are based. However, we believed it was important to capture a wider range of studies to obtain a truer, more robust picture of ACL injury incidence among athletes. In addition, heterogeneity was relatively high (>75%) for the point estimates, indicating that populations that were grouped together may actually have differed. However, this was expected, as different sports have different demands that change the risk of sustaining an ACL injury. Moreover, heterogeneity for the rate ratios was low, and in some cases was 0%, indicating that the results were consistent and potentially generalizable. Given that female participation in collision sports was less prevalent than male participation, we included relatively few studies in which differences in ACL injury IRs between sexes were investigated. We could not control for variables known to contribute to ACL injury, including surface type, anticipation (anticipated event versus unanticipated event), or mechanism of injury (contact versus noncontact) because of a lack of information. Finally, we did not stratify by age or level of play, as those were not aims of this study.

To address these limitations, future researchers should report their findings in the most accurate units possible (player-hours) or should make both player-hours and AEs available to provide the opportunity for meta-analysis. Given that prospective designs allow for real-time data capture, investigators conducting future research in injury epidemiology should use prospective designs. Developing a standard and comprehensive checklist for criteria that should be met when performing or designing a prospective observational cohort study would provide a guide for researchers to achieve maximum study quality. This meta-analysis should be repeated in the future when more ACL injury data are available to permit comparisons of incidence rates among female and male athletes participating in collision and limited-contact sports. Finally, researchers should establish ACL injury IRs within each sport type while controlling for confounding variables, including age and level of play.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of ACL injury is associated with the nature of player-to-player contact inherent in the sport. Female athletes had greater ACL injury IRs than male athletes in contact and fixed-object HIRL sports. The latter sports category had the highest ACL injury IRs for both sexes, which might suggest the need for a new sport type to identify athletes at the highest risk of ACL injury. Future strategies aimed at reducing the risk of ACL injury may benefit from considering and integrating sport-related perturbation that mimics contact exposure to better equip athletes with preprepatory and avoidance techniques.

Supplementary Material

SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL

Supplemental Figures (197.2KB, zip) . Series of forest plots for incidence rate ratios.

Found at DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4085/1062-6050-407-16.S1

REFERENCES

  • 1.Hootman JM, Dick R, Agel J. Epidemiology of collegiate injuries for 15 sports: summary and recommendations for injury prevention initiatives. J Athl Train. 2007;42(2):311–319. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Arendt E, Dick R. Knee injury patterns among men and women in collegiate basketball and soccer: NCAA data and review of literature. Am J Sports Med. 1995;23(6):694–701. doi: 10.1177/036354659502300611. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Prodromos CC, Han Y, Rogowski J, Joyce B, Shi K. A meta-analysis of the incidence of anterior cruciate ligament tears as a function of gender, sport, and a knee injury–reduction regimen. Arthroscopy. 2007;23(12):1320–1325. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2007.07.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Agel J, Arendt EA, Bershadsky B. Anterior cruciate ligament injury in National Collegiate Athletic Association basketball and soccer: a 13-year review. Am J Sports Med. 2005;33(4):524–530. doi: 10.1177/0363546504269937. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG The PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6(7):e1000097. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Brooks JHM, Fuller CW, Kemp SPT, Reddin DB. Epidemiology of injuries in English professional rugby union: part 2 training injuries. Br J Sports Med. 2005;39(10):767–775. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2005.018408. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Mandelbaum BR, Silvers HJ, Watanabe DS, et al. Effectiveness of a neuromuscular and proprioceptive training program in preventing anterior cruciate ligament injuries in female athletes: 2-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2005;33(7):1003–1010. doi: 10.1177/0363546504272261. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Nagano Y, Miki H, Tsuda K, Shimizu Y, Fukubayashi T. Prevention of anterior cruciate ligament injuries in female basketball players in Japan: an intervention study over four seasons [abstract] Br J Sports Med. 2011;45(4):365. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Bjordal JM, Arnly F, Hannestad B, Strand T. Epidemiology of anterior cruciate ligament injuries in soccer. Am J Sports Med. 1997;25(3):341–345. doi: 10.1177/036354659702500312. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Mufty S, Bollars P, Vanlommel L, Van Crombrugge K, Corten K, Bellemans J. Injuries in male versus female soccer players: epidemiology of a nationwide study. Acta Orthop Belg. 2015;81(2):289–295. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Ristolainen L, Heinonen A, Waller B, Kujala UM, Kettunen JA. Gender differences in sport injury risk and types of injuries: a retrospective twelve-month study on cross-country skiers, swimmers, long-distance runners and soccer players. J Sports Sci Med. 2009;8(3):443–451. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Moroder P, Runer A, Hoffelner T, Frick N, Resch H, Tauber M. A prospective study of snowkiting injuries. Am J Sports Med. 2011;39(7):1534–1540. doi: 10.1177/0363546511398214. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Hershman EB, Anderson R, Bergfeld JA, et al. An analysis of specific lower extremity injury rates on grass and FieldTurf playing surfaces in National Football League games: 2000–2009 seasons. Am J Sports Med. 2012;40(10):2200–2205. doi: 10.1177/0363546512458888. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Powell JW, Schootman M. A multivariate risk analysis of selected playing surfaces in the National Football League: 1980 to 1989. An epidemiologic study of knee injuries. Am J Sports Med. 1992;20(6):686–694. doi: 10.1177/036354659202000609. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Rauh MJ, Macera CA, Ji M, Wiksten DL. Subsequent injury patterns in girls' high school sports. J Athl Train. 2007;42(4):486–494. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Quality assessment tool for observational cohort and cross-sectional studies. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Web site. 2018 http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health-pro/guidelines/in-develop/cardiovascular-risk-reduction/tools/cohort Accessed April 7,
  • 17.Beynnon BD, Vacek PM, Newell MK, et al. The effects of level of competition, sport, and sex on the incidence of first-time noncontact anterior cruciate ligament injury. Am J Sports Med. 2014;42(8):1806–1812. doi: 10.1177/0363546514540862. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Dallalana RJ, Brooks JH, Kemp SPT, Williams AM. The epidemiology of knee injuries in English Professional Rugby Union. Am J Sports Med. 2007;35(5):818–830. doi: 10.1177/0363546506296738. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Dragoo JL, Braun HJ, Durham JL, Chen MR, Harris AH. Incidence and risk factors for injuries to the anterior cruciate ligament in National Collegiate Athletic Association football: data from the 2004–2005 through 2008–2009 National Collegiate Athletic Association Injury Surveillance System. Am J Sports Med. 2012;40(5):990–995. doi: 10.1177/0363546512442336. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Gilchrist J, Mandelbaum BR, Melancon H, et al. A randomized controlled trial to prevent noncontact anterior cruciate ligament injury in female collegiate soccer players. Am J Sports Med. 2008;36(8):1476–1483. doi: 10.1177/0363546508318188. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Gomez E, DeLee JC, Farney WC. Incidence of injury in Texas girls' high school basketball. Am J Sports Med. 1996;24(5):684–687. doi: 10.1177/036354659602400521. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Gwinn DE, Wilckens JH, McDevitt ER, Ross G, Kao TC. The relative incidence of anterior cruciate ligament injury in men and women at the United States Naval Academy. Am J Sports Med. 2000;28(1):98–102. doi: 10.1177/03635465000280012901. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Joseph AM, Collins CL, Henke NM, Yard EE, Fields SK, Comstock RD. A multisport epidemiologic comparison of anterior cruciate ligament injuries in high school athletics. J Athl Train. 2013;48(6):810–817. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-48.6.03. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Kiani A, Hellquist E, Ahlqvist K, Gedeborg R, Michaelsson K, Byberg L. Prevention of soccer-related knee injuries in teenaged girls. Arch Intern Med. 2010;170(1):43–49. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2009.289. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.LaBella CR, Huxford MR, Grissom J, Kim KY, Peng J, Christoffel KK. Effect of neuromuscular warm-up on injuries in female soccer and basketball athletes in urban public high schools: cluster randomized controlled trial. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2011;165(11):1033–1040. doi: 10.1001/archpediatrics.2011.168. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Levy AS, Wetzler MJ, Lewars M, Laughlin W. Knee injuries in women collegiate rugby players. Am J Sports Med. 1997;25(3):360–362. doi: 10.1177/036354659702500315. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Liederbach M, Dilgen FE, Rose DJ. Incidence of anterior cruciate ligament injuries among elite ballet and modern dancers: a 5-year prospective study. Am J Sports Med. 2008;36(9):1779–1788. doi: 10.1177/0363546508323644. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Messina DF, Farney WC, DeLee JC. The incidence of injury in Texas high school basketball: a prospective study among male and female athletes. Am J Sports Med. 1999;27(3):294–299. doi: 10.1177/03635465990270030401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Mountcastle SB, Posner M, Kragh JF, Jr, Taylor DC. Gender differences in anterior cruciate ligament injury vary with activity: epidemiology of anterior cruciate ligament injuries in a young, athletic population. Am J Sports Med. 2007;35(10):1635–1642. doi: 10.1177/0363546507302917. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Pasanen K, Parkkari J, Pasanen M, et al. Neuromuscular training and the risk of leg injuries in female floorball players: cluster randomised controlled study. BMJ. 2008;337:a295. doi: 10.1136/bmj.a295. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Petersen W, Braun C, Bock W, et al. A controlled prospective case control study of a prevention training program in female team handball players: the German experience. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2005;125(9):614–621. doi: 10.1007/s00402-005-0793-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Pfeiffer RP, Shea KG, Roberts D, Grandstrand S, Bond L. Lack of effect of a knee ligament injury prevention program on the incidence of noncontact anterior cruciate ligament injury. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88(8):1769–1774. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.E.00616. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Steffen K, Myklebust G, Olsen OE, Holme I, Bahr R. Preventing injuries in female youth football: a cluster-randomized controlled trial. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2008;18(5):605–614. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0838.2007.00703.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Tegnander A, Olsen OE, Moholdt TT, Engebretsen L, Bahr R. Injuries in Norwegian female elite soccer: a prospective one-season cohort study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2008;16(2):194–198. doi: 10.1007/s00167-007-0403-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Trojian TH, Collins S. The anterior cruciate ligament tear rate varies by race in professional women's basketball. Am J Sports Med. 2006;34(6):895–898. doi: 10.1177/0363546505284384. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Viola RW, Steadman JR, Mair SD, Briggs KK, Sterett WI. Anterior cruciate ligament injury incidence among male and female professional alpine skiers. Am J Sports Med. 1999;27(6):792–795. doi: 10.1177/03635465990270061701. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Waldén M, Atroshi I, Magnusson H, Wagner P, Hägglund M. Prevention of acute knee injuries in adolescent female football players: cluster randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2012;344:e3042. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e3042. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Agel J, Rockwood T, Klossner D. Collegiate ACL injury rates across 15 sports: National Collegiate Athletic Association Injury Surveillance System data update (2004–2005 through 2012–2013) Clin J Sport Med. 2016;26(6):518–523. doi: 10.1097/JSM.0000000000000290. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Stanley LE, Kerr ZY, Dompier TP, Padua DA. Sex differences in the incidence of anterior cruciate ligament, medial collateral ligament, and meniscal injuries in collegiate and high school sports: 2009–2010 through 2013–2014. Am J Sports Med. 2016;44(6):1565–1572. doi: 10.1177/0363546516630927. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Faude O, Junge A, Kindermann W, Dvorak J. Injuries in female soccer players: a prospective study in the German national league. Am J Sports Med. 2005;33(11):1694–1700. doi: 10.1177/0363546505275011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Hägglund M, Waldén M, Ekstrand J. Injuries among male and female elite football players. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2009;19(6):819–827. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0838.2008.00861.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Krutsch W, Zeman F, Zellner J, Pfeifer C, Nerlich M, Angele P. Increase in ACL and PCL injuries after implementation of a new professional football league. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016;24(7):2271–2279. doi: 10.1007/s00167-014-3357-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Le Gall F, Carling C, Reilly T. Injuries in young elite female soccer players: an 8-season prospective study. Am J Sports Med. 2008;36(2):276–284. doi: 10.1177/0363546507307866. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Myklebust G, Engebretsen L, Braekken IH, Skjolberg A, Olsen OE, Bahr R. Prevention of anterior cruciate ligament injuries in female team handball players: a prospective intervention study over three seasons [abstract] Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2003;13(4):272. doi: 10.1097/00042752-200303000-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Östenberg A, Roos H. Injury risk factors in female European football: a prospective study of 123 players during one season. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2000;10(5):279–285. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0838.2000.010005279.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Söderman K, Werner S, Pietilä T, Engström B, Alfredson H. Balance board training: prevention of traumatic injuries of the lower extremities in female soccer players? A prospective randomized intervention study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2000;8(6):356–363. doi: 10.1007/s001670000147. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Waldén M, Hägglund M, Magnusson H, Ekstrand J. Anterior cruciate ligament injury in elite football: a prospective three-cohort study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2011;19(1):11–19. doi: 10.1007/s00167-010-1170-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Giza E, Mithöfer K, Farrell L, Zarins B, Gill T. Injuries in women's professional soccer. Br J Sports Med. 2005;39(4):212–216. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2004.011973. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Owens BD, Mountcastle SB, Dunn WR, DeBerardino TM, Taylor DC. Incidence of anterior cruciate ligament injury among active duty US military servicemen and servicewomen. Mil Med. 2007;172(1):90–91. doi: 10.7205/milmed.172.1.90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Hewett TE, Myer GD, Ford KR, et al. Biomechanical measures of neuromuscular control and valgus loading of the knee predict anterior cruciate ligament injury risk in female athletes: a prospective study. Am J Sports Med. 2005;33(4):492–501. doi: 10.1177/0363546504269591. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials


Articles from Journal of Athletic Training are provided here courtesy of National Athletic Trainers Association

RESOURCES