Skip to main content
PMC home page
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2019 Jul 1;9:9414. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-45982-7

Retinoic acid and arsenic trioxide induce lasting differentiation and demethylation of target genes in APL cells

Thomas T Huynh 1,#, Mohammad Sultan 1,#, Dejan Vidovic 1, Cheryl A Dean 1, Brianne M Cruickshank 1, Kristen Lee 2, Chao-Yu Loung 3, Ryan W Holloway 1, David W Hoskin 1,3, David M Waisman 1,4, Ian C G Weaver 1,2,5,6,✉, Paola Marcato 1,3,✉
PMCID: PMC6602962  PMID: 31263158

Abstract

Acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) is characterized by arrested differentiation of promyelocytes. Patients treated with all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) alone experience relapse, while patients treated with ATRA and arsenic trioxide (ATO) are often relapse-free. This suggests sustained changes have been elicited by the combination therapy. To understand the lasting effects of the combination therapy, we compared the effects of ATRA and ATO on NB4 and ATRA-resistant NB4-MR2 APL cells during treatment versus post treatment termination. After treatment termination, NB4 cells treated with ATRA or ATO reverted to non-differentiated cells, while combination-treated cells remained terminally differentiated. This effect was diminished in NB4-MR2 cells. This suggests combination treatment induced more permanent changes. Combination treatment induced higher expression of target genes (e.g., transglutaminase 2 and retinoic acid receptor beta), which in NB4 cells was sustained post treatment termination. To determine whether sustained epigenetic changes were responsible, we quantified the enrichment of histone modifications by chromatin immunoprecipitation, and CpG methylation by bisulfite-pyrosequencing. While ATRA and combination treatment induced similar histone acetylation enrichment, combination treatment induced greater demethylation of target genes, which was sustained. Therefore, sustained demethylation of target genes by ATRA and ATO combination treatment is associated with lasting differentiation and gene expression changes.

Subject terms: Acute myeloid leukaemia, Experimental models of disease

Introduction

Acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) accounts for approximately 10–15% of adult acute myeloid leukemias1 and until recently was associated with high mortality and poor patient outcomes2. The malignancy is characterized by arrested promyelocyte differentiation in the myeloid lineage of hematopoietic stem cells, resulting in the absence of mature granulocytes and an over accumulation of promyelocyte precursors3. The deficiency of this population of cells manifests in patients as severe coagulation defects that can culminate in fatal disseminated intravascular coagulation and systemic hemorrhaging4. Uniquely, the cause in 98% of APL cases is attributed to a single chromosomal translocation event between chromosome 15 and chromosome 175–7. This results in aberrant fusion between the promyelocytic leukemia (PML) and retinoic acid receptor α (RARα) genes located on the respective chromosomes. The resultant PML-RARα chimeric protein behaves as an altered RAR nuclear receptor, which changes the DNA binding specificity, and represses the transcriptional programs normally controlled by RAR-retinoid-X-receptor heterodimers, through enhanced interactions with corepressors8–10. Consequently, differentiation is abrogated and immortalization of the promyelocytes is promoted.

Similar to other malignancies, APL cells are characterized by aberrant epigenetic changes to DNA methylation and histone modifications which interfere with normal transcriptional programs and contribute to blocked granulocyte differentiation and disease progression11. Specifically, PML-RARα binding to target gene promoters (e.g., retinoic acid receptor beta, RARβ; transglutaminase 2, TGM2) is associated with decreased activating histone marks (e.g., acetylation of histone 3 lysine 9 and 14, H3K9/14ac), increased repressive histone marks (e.g., tri-methylation of histone 3 lysine, H3K9me3) and DNA hypermethylation, leading to repressed transcription and heterochromatin formation12–16. PML-RARα binding to DNA is sufficient to induce histone modification changes, while DNA methylation changes can occur independent of PML-RARα and are believed to be a late event in leukemogenesis and associated with loss of transcription factor binding16.

In the context of treatment, the oncogenic fusion gene provides an ideal target for therapeutic intervention, since supraphysiological levels of the RAR ligand, all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA), induces degradation of the PML-RARα in APL cells and restores normal RAR transcriptional programs9,13,17. ATRA-induced target genes such as TGM2, mediate the differentiation of leukemic promyelocytes into mature granulocytes, restoring normal coagulation dynamics18,19. In terms of its effects on the aberrant epigenome of APL cells, ATRA induces genome-wide activating histone acetylation (e.g., H3K9ac and H3K9/14ac) of target genes, but it has negligible effects on histone methylation (e.g., H3K9me3 and H3K27me3) and DNA methylation12–16. Since the first introduction of ATRA therapy for APL in 1985, it has had a dramatic impact in the survival outcomes of this once deadly disease20. Used alone, ATRA induces a short-term remission in approximately 80% of patients21–24. Its subsequent combination with anthracycline-based chemotherapies significantly reduced relapse and increased response rates. Recent trials have demonstrated that the combination of ATRA with arsenic trioxide (ATO) treatment is superior to the combination of ATRA and anthracyclines; as a result, treatment recommendations are moving towards this newer combination22,25–30.

ATO induces degradation of PML-RARα, modest differentiation and apoptosis of APL cells, and is synergistic with ATRA22,31–33. The underlying mechanism behind the reduced relapse rates of the combination treatment is only partly understood and the effects of the combination treatment on epigenetic modifications have not been explored. In this study, we compare the short-term, long-term and the post treatment termination effects of ATRA and ATO on NB4 and ATRA-resistant NB4-MR2 APL cells, and characterized the epigenetic modifications of canonical target and differentiation genes RARβ and TGM2. The enhanced effectiveness of ATRA and ATO combination treatment in inducing terminal differentiation and expression of target genes was most evident 96 h after treatment was terminated. This effect was significantly diminished in ATRA-resistant NB4-MR2 cells. ATRA and ATO combination treatment reduced CpG island methylation of target gene promoters, which was sustained even after treatment was terminated. Together, this data provides new evidence of the benefits of ATRA and ATO post treatment termination and possible underlying epigenetic mechanisms for the reduced relapse associated with the combination treatment.

Methods

Cell line and culture conditions

NB4 cells (obtained from DSMZ) and NB4-MR2 cells (kindly provided by Dr. Wilson Miller Jr., McGill University, Montreal, QC)34 and cultured in suspension in cell culture grade flasks at 37 °C in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2 using RPMI-1640 (Invitrogen, Thermo Fisher Scientific) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and antibiotic-antimycotic (Invitrogen, Thermo Fisher Scientific) solution.

Treatment protocol

All-trans retinoic acid (ATRA, Sigma-Aldrich) was dissolved in DMSO as a 100 mM stock solution and arsenic trioxide (ATO, Sigma-Aldrich) was dissolved in NaOH as a 100 mM stock solution and stored in aliquots at −80 °C. Prior to use, they were serially diluted in media to working concentrations. NB4 or NB4-MR2 cells were seeded in RPMI-1640 medium into flasks under four conditions: no treatment, 1 µM ATRA, 0.5 µM or 1.5 µM ATO, and combination treatment (1 µM ATRA and 0.5 µM or 1.5 µM ATO) for 72 h. A portion of these cells were then collected for various assays at the 72 h timepoint. The remainder of the cells were then passaged, and the medium was refreshed with their respective treatment conditions to extend treatment for up to 168 h, and then cells were collected for various analyses. Alternatively, for the 96 h post treatment termination timepoint, the cells from their respective flask were collected by centrifugation at 72 h after treatment initiation, washed with phosphate buffered saline (PBS) to remove residual drug(s) and returned to culture with drug-free treatment medium for another 96 h, before termination of the experiment and collection of cells. To minimize overcrowding of the cells (which contributes to background cell death) in the no treatment, ATRA alone and low dose ATO conditions, a portion of the cells were removed at 72 h and more media was added at 120 h.

Flow cytometry

Treated NB4 cells were collected at 3 timepoints for flow cytometry analysis (72 h, 168 h and, 96 h post treatment for 72 h). Cells were collected by centrifugation (500xg) and each sample was then washed in PBS and suspended in blocking buffer consisting of PBS supplemented with 1% FBS and 1% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA, Sigma-Aldrich) and incubated with 3 µL Alexafluor 488 conjugated anti-human CD11b monoclonal mouse antibody (clone M1/70.15, Invitrogen, Thermo Fisher Scientific) in 100 µL of PBS containing 1% FBS, 1% EDTA for 30 min at 4 °C. Afterwards, the cells were centrifuged at 500xg and resuspended in PBS containing 1% FBS, 1% EDTA and 7‐aminoactinomycin D (7‐ADD, Biolegend) diluted to 1/50. A fluorescence activated cell sorter (FACS) Calibur or Canto (BD Pharmingen) was then used to detect the percentage of differentiated cells (CD11b + only or CD11b + and 7-AAD+) and dead undifferentiated cells (7-AAD only). The flow cytometry data was analyzed using FCS Express 4 Research Edition software (De Novo Software).

Quantitative PCR

Total RNA was extracted from treated NB4 cells at two timepoints (72 h and at 96 h post treatment termination) using Trizol (Invitrogen, Thermo Fisher Scientific) and a Purelink RNA purification kit (Invitrogen, Thermo Fisher Scientific), following the manufacturer’s instructions, with the addition of an on-column DNase I (Invitrogen) treatment step. Equal amounts of RNA (0.25 µg) was converted into cDNA using an iScript cDNA Synthesis Kit (Bio‐Rad) according to the manufacturer’s recommendations. Quantitative PCR (qPCR) was performed by using SsoFast EvaGreen Supermix (Bio‐Rad) and gene‐specific primers (Supplemental Table 1) with a CFX384 thermocycler Touch real‐time PCR detection system (Bio‐Rad). Standard curves were generated for each primer set, and primer efficiencies were incorporated into the CFX Manager software (Bio‐Rad). The mRNA levels of each sample was calculated relative to two reference genes (HRPT1 and TBP) and normalized to their respective no treatment controls.

Bisulfite pyrosequencing

Using a Purelink Genomic DNA mini kit (Invitrogen Thermo Fisher Scientific) and following the manufacturer’s instructions, genomic DNA was extracted from treated NB4 cells at 72 h and 96 h post treatment termination timepoints. Based on previous published methods, gene promotor specific DNA‐methylation was analyzed by sodium bisulfite pyrosequencing on a PyroMark Q24 Advanced pyrosequencer using the DNA EpiTect Fast DNA Bisulfite Kit and PyroMark PCR Kit (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Three custom assays covering the LINE-1, RARβ and TGM2 promoters were designed using PyroMark Assay Design software (v2.0; Qiagen N.V, Venlo, The Netherlands) and validated to amplify single PCR products (LINE-1 = 400nt, RARβ = 400nt, TGM2 = 428nt) and the primer sequences listed in Supplemental Table 2. PCR conditions for both assays: 95 °C, 15 minutes; (94 °C, 30 sec; 56 °C, 30 sec; 72 °C, 30 sec) × 50 cycles; and 72 °C, 10 min.

Statistical analysis

All statistical analyses were performed with GraphPad Prism Version 7. ANOVA (one‐way analysis of variance or repeated measures) was performed followed by post‐tests Dunnett or Bonferroni (specified in the figure legends), when multiple comparisons were made. Significant p values are represented as follows: * < 0.05.

Results

ATRA and ATO combination treatment sustains differentiation and results in cell death of NB4 cells post treatment termination

While ATRA alone induces short-term remission in APL patients22, the complete remission induced by daily dosage of 45 mg/m2ATRA and 0.15 mg/kg ATO combination treatment25,27,28,35,36, suggests the combination treatment is better at inducing long-term lasting effects, which are sustained post treatment termination. Pharmacokinetic studies in patients suggests that these doses translate to peak plasma concentrations of approximately 1 µM for ATRA37,38, while ATO has been reported as peaking at 6.85 µM before troughing to less than 1 µM33, to ranging from 0.08 to 0.40 µM39, or from 0.11 to 0.37 µM40. Therefore, to study the effect of these drugs alone or in combination for maintaining differentiation or inducing cell death post treatment termination, we treated the APL cell line NB4 or the MR2 ATRA-resistant clone with 1 µM ATRA and 0.5 µM ATO (Fig. 1) or 1.5 µM ATO (Supplemental Fig. 1), alone or in combination, to capture the range of potential ATO doses in patient circulation. We treated the cells continuously for 72 h or 168 h (Fig. 1A). Alternatively, after 72 h, treatment was terminated by washing the cells and subsequently culturing the cells for an additional 96 h in treatment-free medium (Fig. 1B). We determined the percentage of differentiated cells (surface expression of myeloid marker CD11b) and dead cells (7-AAD staining) under these various treatment conditions by flow cytometry. The combination of 1 µM ATRA and 0.5 µM ATO induced a larger population of differentiated CD11b positive cells in comparison to single ATRA and ATO treated cells after 72 h (Fig. 1C). As described previously, the higher dose of ATO induced greater cell death (Supplemental Fig. 1)29,41–43. The population of differentiated cells (and differentiated cells that had died) became significantly more pronounced at 168 h (CD11b/7-ADD positive cells, Fig. 1D). However, the potential synergistic benefits of ATRA and ATO combination treatments became most evident after treatment was terminated for 96 h (Fig. 1B,E, Supplemental Fig. 1). Ninety-six hours post treatment termination, most of the cells treated with the single agents now lacked staining for the differentiation and death markers (Fig. 1E). We noted that the background cell death had increased 96 h post treatment termination. This was possibly due to overcrowding of the proliferating cells or stress that was induced by washing the cells.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

Combination 1 µM ATRA and 0.5 µM ATO treatment sustains differentiation and death of NB4 cells 96 h post treatment termination. (A) Schematic of treatment timeline and the timepoints NB4 cells samples were analyzed in (C and D). (B) Schematic of treatment timeline and the timepoint NB4 cells samples were analyzed in (E). (C–E) Representative flow cytometry dot plots of CD11b+, 7-AAD+, and CD11b+ /7-AAD+ NB4 cells under no treatment, 0.5 µM ATO, 1 µM ATRA, 0.5 µM ATO + 1 µM ATRA treatment after 72 h of continuous treatment (C), or 168 h of continuous treatment (D), or after 72 h treatment and subsequent 96 h post treatment termination. (C–E) The stacked bar graphs summarize the results of dot plots (n = 4, error bars represent standard deviation).

Most strikingly and in sharp contrast to cells treated with single agents, the combination 1 µM ATRA + 0.5 µM ATO treated cells were still mostly differentiated and/or dead at 96 h post treatment termination (CD11b/7-ADD positive cells, Fig. 1D). This data mimics the clinical findings20,22,26,27, whereby ATRA and ATO combination therapy result in sustained effects, which persist after the termination of therapy.

We applied the same treatment regimen to the ATRA-resistant NB4-MR2 cells (Fig. 2A,B). As expected, ATRA alone did not induce differentiation of the cells; however, the cells were partly differentiated by the ATRA and 0.5 µM ATO combination treatment, and predominately killed by 1.5 µM ATO (Fig. 2C). This is consistent with previously published findings, where the ATRA-resistant NB4-MR2 cells remain sensitive to ATO treatment41–43.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

ATRA and ATO treatment have a reduced effect on inducing and sustaining differentiation and cell death in NB4-MR2 cells. (A) Schematic of treatment timeline and the timepoints NB4-MR2 cell samples were analyzed in (B and C). (B and C) Representative flow cytometry dot plots of CD11b+, 7-AAD+, and CD11b+/7-AAD+ NB4-MR2 cells under no treatment, 0.5uM ATO, 1.5 µM ATO, 1 µM ATRA, 0.5 µM ATO+ 1 µM ATRA, or 1.5 µM ATO+ 1 µM ATRA treatment after 72 h of continuous treatment (B) and after treatment has been terminated for 96 h (C). The stacked bar graphs summarize the results of dot plots (n = 4, error bars represent standard deviation).

Combination treatment of ATRA and ATO is more effective at maintaining high transcript levels of TGM2, RARβ, CCL2 and ASB2 in NB4 cells post treatment termination

Having observed that ATRA and ATO combination treatment maintain the majority of NB4 cells in a state of terminal differentiation after treatment had ended (Fig. 1E, Supplemental Fig. 1), we next wondered if gene expression changes were similarly more persistent. Gene expression changes are a key component of the interfered differentiation and symptoms of APL disease44. Supraphysiological levels of ATRA can restore the expression of epigenetically silenced target genes in APL cells13. Using QPCR, we determined the effect of ATRA and ATO individually or in combination at 72 h and following 96 h post treatment termination, on the mRNA levels of several genes involved in APL processes such as leukemic differentiation (TGM2, RARβ), granulocyte function (MPO, PRTN3) and other ATRA-regulated targets (e.g., CCL2) in comparison to single agent treatment15,44. ATRA alone and combination treatment resulted in significantly higher transcript levels of several genes (TGM2, RARβ, CCL2, ASB2, RPL7A, RARα, RAB33A, NDUFB10, NCL and HIST1H2BK) after 72 h of treatment (Fig. 3A). ATO treatment alone had a comparatively minor effect on expression of the genes. Notably, for most of the genes, there was no significant difference in the transcript levels induced by ATRA alone and combination treated cells (Fig. 3A). One notable exception was RARβ, which was induced to higher levels when NB4 cells were treated with combination treatment ATRA with higher dose 1.5 µM ATO. Interestingly, the sustained effects of the combination treatments over ATRA alone became much more apparent 96 h after termination of treatment, where the higher transcript levels of TGM2, RARβ, CCL2 and ASB2 were still present (Fig. 3B). Therefore, the combination treatments maintained greater transcript levels of these genes once treatment had been terminated. The sustained expression of certain target genes may explain why terminal granulocytic differentiation is sustained in combination treated cells in comparison to single agent treated cells, especially considering the key role that TGM2 has in differentiation of NB4 cells18.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

Combination treatment of ATRA and ATO is more effective at maintaining high levels of TGM2, RARβ, CCL2 and ASB2 mRNA 96 h post treatment termination. (A and B) QPCR analysis detects relative levels of mRNA of target genes in NB4 cells 72 h after treatment (A) and subsequent 96 h post treatment termination (B) with 0.5 µM ATO, 1.5 µM ATO, 1 µM ATRA, or combination treatments. The mRNA levels of target genes are log2 transformed and relative to the no treatment sample and reference genes (n = 4, error bars represent standard deviation, significance determined using one-way ANOVA with multiple comparisons, p value < 0.05 indicated by *). Notably, the 1.5 µM ATO, 1.5 µM ATO + 1 µM ATRA combination treatment samples were completed at a later time and compared to their own no treatment control.

Combination treatment of ATRA and ATO fails to maintain high transcript levels of target genes in NB4-MR2 cells post treatment termination

We compared the expression of these genes in NB4-MR2 cells under the same treatment conditions. Notably the ATRA-resistant clone has demonstrated altered ligand binding of PML/RAR-alpha and retinoid-induced gene expression34. We also found a somewhat different gene expression profile induced by the treatments at 72 h in NB4-MR2 cells, with generally more pronounced gene expression changes induced in the combination treatments (Fig. 4A). A notable exception was that much greater levels of RARβ was induced in the cells treated with higher dose 1.5 µM ATO alone (Fig. 4A). However, once treatment was terminated for 96 h, the gene expression changes that had been induced in the NB4-MR2 cells were only weakly sustained by the combination treatment ATRA with higher dose ATO (Fig. 4B). This is in sharp contrast to the NB4 cells, in which the combination treatment ATRA with even the lower dose ATO resulted in generally well sustained expression of genes (e.g. TGM2 and RARβ) at 96 h post treatment termination (Fig. 3B).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

ATRA and ATO induce gene expression changes in NB4-MR2 cells, which are weakly sustained post treatment termination. (A and B) QPCR analysis detects relative levels of mRNA of target genes in NB4-MR2 cells 72 h after treatment (A) and subsequent 96 h post treatment termination (B) with 0.5 µM ATO, 1.5 µM ATO, 1 µM ATRA, or combination treatments. The mRNA levels of target genes are log2 transformed and relative to the no treatment sample and reference genes (n = 4, error bars represent standard deviation, significance determined using one-way ANOVA with multiple comparisons, p value < 0.05 indicated by*).

ATRA induces sustained enrichment of H3K9/14ac at the TGM2 and RARβ promoters in NB4 cells, which is not augmented by combination treatment

Decreased H3K9/14ac at target genes is key in their decreased expression in APL cells and ATRA-induced gene expression is associated with H3K9/14ac enrichment15. We therefore wondered if the greater sustained expression post treatment termination of some target genes induced by combination treatment (Fig. 3B) was due to greater enrichment of H3K9/14ac. Since TGM2 and RARβ were most induced, with the greatest sustained expression by the combination treatment once treatment was terminated, we focused on these two genes for H3K9/14ac analysis by ChIP-qPCR. In agreement with previous reports, ATRA induced H3K9/14ac enrichment at TGM2 and RARβ promoters (Supplemental Fig. 2A). The combination treatment of ATRA + 0.5 µM ATO did not further augment the H3K9/14ac enrichment at both 72 h and after 96 h post treatment termination. The lack of significant difference between the combination treatment versus the ATRA treatment alone (Supplemental Fig. 2A) suggests that H3K9/14ac enrichment may not play a critical role in the greater sustained expression of the genes induced by combination treatment (Fig. 3B).

We next wondered if perhaps the combination treatment decreases repressive H3K9me3 and H3K27me3 marks associated with silencing of TGM2 and RARβ in APL cells13. Consistent with previous reports, ATRA had a minimal effect on H3K9me3 and H3K27me3 enrichment at the target genes (Supplemental Fig. 2B and C). The combination treatment also had minimal effects on the enrichment of the two repressive histone marks (Supplemental Fig. 2B and C). Overall, this indicates that the greater sustained TGM2 and RARβ mRNA levels induced by combination treatment (Fig. 3B) is probably not due to changes in these histone modifications (Supplemental Fig. 2).

Combination treatment demethylates the CpG sites in the promoter regions of TGM2 and RARβ in NB4 cells, and demethylation is sustained post t.reatment termination

CpG island DNA hypermethylation silencing of genes contributes to the arrested differentiation of granulocytes in APL16. Although ATRA is capable of inducing APL cells into a differentiated granulocytic phenotype, most evidence suggest that target genes, including differentiation-inducing gene TGM2 and canonical target gene RARβ, remain aberrantly hypermethylated upon ATRA treatment14,45. However, we wondered if the combination treatment (or ATO) could be affecting the promoter methylation of the genes, contributing to the greater sustained transcript levels of the genes post treatment termination. Bisulfite pyrosequencing was used to interrogate the 20 CpGs in the CpG island in the TGM2 promoter (Fig. 5A). Combination treatment of ATRA with 0.5 µM ATO significantly reduced the total C-methylation of the TGM2 promoter region after 72 h treatment (Fig. 5B), and the demethylation was sustained 96 h after treatment had been terminated (Fig. 5C). Interestingly, the single agents did have some effect on methylation at individual sites and at 96 h after treatment had been terminated, ATRA and ATO alone did reduce overall methylation as well, albeit to lesser degree than the combination treatment. Notably, similar to the greater gene expression changes induced by combination ATRA treatment with the higher dose 1.5 µM ATO (Fig. 3), this combination also induced greater demethylation of the gene region (Supplemental Fig. 3). We noted that RARα and RARβ binding sites are in the TGM2 promoter region (Fig. 5A), and CpG site 15 is located within a RARα binding site. CpG site 15 was among the more hypermethylated in the TGM2 promoter region, and therefore its demethylation by the combination treatments (Fig. 5 and Supplemental Fig. 3), may be particularly important for expression of TGM2 (Fig. 3).

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Open in a new tab

Combination 1 µM ATRA and 0.5 µM ATO treatment induces sustained demethylation of the CpG island in the promoter region of TGM2 in NB4 cells. (A) Schematic representation of the TGM2 promoter region and the specific 20 CpG sites located within the region that was bisulfite pyrosequenced. The binding sites for RARα and RARβ are indicated. (B and C) The methylation percentage of the individual 20 CpG sites and total C-methylation percentage of the region in NB4 cells following 72 h of treatment (B) and subsequent 96 h post treatment termination (C). Error bars represent standard deviation, significance determined using one-way ANOVA with multiple comparisons, n = 5.

We also interrogated the methylation of the 15 CpG sites in the CpG island neighboring the RARβ transcription start that contains RARα and RARβ binding sites by bisulfite pyrosequencing (Fig. 6A). Again, treatment with ATRA or 0.5 µM ATO alone did not significantly alter the overall CpG methylation of the region, but combination treatment significantly reduced the total C-methylation of the RARβ promoter region at 72 h (Fig. 6B). Importantly, this effect was sustained 96 h after treatment termination (Fig. 6C). These demethylation effects were augmented in the combination ATRA and higher dose 1.5 µM ATO treated cells (Supplemental Fig. 4). Of note as well is the overall shift in CpG methylation at some sites when comparing 72 h versus 96 h post treatment conditions, even in the no treatment condition samples (e.g. sites 11 and 14, Fig. 6). This is possibly reflective of the dynamic methylation status of some of the CpG sites in the region that may be susceptible to changes in cell culturing conditions (e.g. cell crowding, spent media, increased background cell death). Regardless, there is still a significant and sustained decrease in methylation when the cells are treated with the combination treatments. Together, the TGM2 and RARβ promoter analyses provides new evidence showing that the combination of ATRA and ATO reduces the aberrant methylation of key target genes, and similar to the transcript level analyses (Fig. 3), this effect was sustained after treatment had been terminated (Figs 5 and 6, and Supplemental Figs 3 and 4).

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Open in a new tab

Combination 1 µM ATRA and 0.5 µM ATO treatment induces sustained demethylation of the CpG island in the promoter region of RARβ in NB4 cells. (A) Schematic representation of RARβ and the specific 15 CpG sites located within the region that were bisulfite pyrosequenced. The binding sites for RARα and RARβ are indicated. (B and C) The methylation percentage of the individual 15 CpG sites and total C-methylation percentage of the region in NB4 cells following 72 h of treatment (B) and subsequent 96 h post treatment termination (C). Error bars represent standard deviation, significance determined using one-way ANOVA with multiple comparisons, n = 5.

Combination treatment demethylates of the CpG sites in the promoter regions of TGM2 and RARβ in NB4-MR2 cells, but demethylation is not sustained post treatment termination

We next wondered how these treatment conditions would affect methylation of promoter regions of TGM2 and RARβ in NB4-MR2 cells, in which gene expression changes were induced, but unlike NB4 cells, the gene expression changes were not sustained post treatment termination (Fig. 4). Bisulfite pyrosequencing revealed that the combination treatments demethylated the promoter region of TGM2 in NB4-MR2 cells (Fig. 7A), but this effect was not sustained post treatment termination (Fig. 7B). These results mirrored the gene expression data for TGM2 in NB4-MR2 cells, which was also not sustained post treatment termination (Fig. 4). Intriguingly, for RARβ, higher dose 1.5 µM ATO treatment alone induced the greatest demethylation of the promoter region (Fig. 8A), which was again reflected in the gene expression changes (Fig. 4A). Importantly, these changes in RARβ methylation (like the changes in gene expression), were not sustained post treatment termination in NB4-MR2 cells (Fig. 4B). Together, this data strongly connects demethylation of the promoter regions of these genes with their increased expression.

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Open in a new tab

ATRA and ATO combination treatment demethylate the CpG island in the promoter region of TGM2 in NB4-MR2 cells, but this is not sustained post treatment termination. (A and B) The methylation percentage of the individual 20 CpG sites and total C-methylation percentage of the region in NB4-MR2 cells following 72 h of treatment (A, n = 4) and subsequent 96 h post treatment termination (B, n = 3). Error bars represent standard deviation, significance determined using one-way ANOVA with multiple comparisons.

Figure 8.

Figure 8

Open in a new tab

1.5 µM ATO demethylates the CpG island in the promoter region of RARβ in NB4-MR2 cells, but this is not sustained post treatment termination. (A and B) The methylation percentage of the individual 15 CpG sites and total C-methylation percentage of the region in NB4-MR2 cells following 72 h of treatment (A, n = 4) and subsequent 96 h post treatment termination (B, n = 3). Error bars represent standard deviation, significance determined using one-way ANOVA with multiple comparisons.

Global DNA methylation levels, represented by bisulfite pyrosequencing of LINE-1, are unchanged in ATRA, ATO or combination treated NB4 and NB4-MR2 cells

We next wondered if the effect of combined ATRA and ATO treatment on CpG methylation extended beyond the target genes and was genome-wide. Long interspersed nucleotide element 1 (LINE-1) elements are transposable repetitive elements making up 17% of genomic DNA and are often heavily methylated, holding up to a third of the methylation in the genome. As such, assessing methylation of LINE-1 elements is an accepted surrogate for general global methylation levels of the genome46–48. Although this technique assesses relatively few CpG sites, LINE-1 bisulfite pyrosquencing has been shown to reflect global DNA methylation changes with high significance49. We performed bisulfite pyrosequencing to assess methylation levels of 27 CpG sites within the promoter region of LINE-1 subfamily L1PA2, which also lacks RARα and RARβ binding sites (Supplemental Fig. 5A)46,50. Overall, LINE-1 methylation was unchanged by any of the treatment conditions at 72 h or 96 h after treatment was terminated in both NB4 cells (Supplemental Figs 5 and 6) and NB4-MR2 cells (Supplemental Fig. 7). This suggests that the reduced CpG methylation in response to treatment is associated with target genes (Figs 5–8), and is probably not global (Supplemental Figs 5–7).

Discussion

Clinically, combined ATRA and ATO therapy is curative in APL patients, inducing long-lasting remission, whereas ATRA treatment alone is effective at eliciting short-term remission22,25–28,51. Previous studies of cultured APL cells describe the enhanced differentiation/cell death induction of the combination treatment over ATRA alone; however, these studies did not extend the analyses post treatment termination32,52,53. This study compares, for the first time, the effects of these treatments four days after treatment termination. Unexpectedly, we observed that under these conditions the effects of the combination treatment were much more dramatic. ATRA induced granulocytic differentiation in the short-term (72 h) and was increased further after long-term continuous treatment (168 h); however, ATRA-induced effects were largely lost once treatment had been terminated (Fig. 1). This is in sharp contrast to the combination treatment, which resulted in the differentiation and/or death of most the of the NB4 cells. Our analyses also revealed the greater overall efficacy achieved by treating APL cells with higher doses of ATO in combination with ATRA; the benefits of which become most apparent in the ATRA-resistant variant clone NB4-MR2 cells (Fig. 2). These findings model the long-lasting effects induced by the combination therapy in patients, which ATRA treatment alone comparably fails to do. The results further illustrate the potential benefit of higher dose ATO in combination with ATRA. The data from most clinical studies illustrating the benefit of ATRA and ATO combination treatment employ 0.15 mg/kg/day ATO25,27,28,35,36. Pharmacokinetic studies report a range of plasma ATO levels based on this dose33,39,40, although the 0.5 µM dose used in this study likely captures the lower reported plasma levels and the 1.5 µM may better represent the higher reported plasma levels. The results of a recent clinical trial utilizing 0.3 mg/kg/day ATO in combination with ATRA reported high rates of complete remission and overall survival54. From the current available patient data, it is unclear if ATRA administered with 0.3 mg/kg/day ATO versus 0.15 mg/kg/day ATO results in significantly different outcomes for APL patients.

In our analyses, the sustained effects of the ATRA and ATO combination treatment post treatment termination was also detected at the transcript level of some target genes in NB4 cells (Fig. 3B) and encouraged us to evaluate the epigenetic modifications of these genes. Epigenetic modifications such as histone marks and DNA methylation regulate gene transcription and are aberrant in APL resulting in silencing of many target genes16,45. Although the level of global methylation in APL NB4 cells remained unchanged by the combination treatments (Supplemental Figs 5 and 6), the methylation of target genes was observed (Figs 5 and 6). An important contributing factor to the increased effectiveness of combination treatment may be the sustained demethylation of target genes that are aberrantly methylated in APL cells (Figs 5 and 6). The aberrant methylation and silencing of RARβ is particularly well described in APL14,15,45,55. With the exception of one early study that used methylation-specific PCR to quantify RARβ methylation post ATRA treatment55, other later studies using more quantitative techniques report that ATRA treatment alone fails to revert the aberrant methylation of RARβ and other genes, including TGM214,15,45. Using the quantitative bisulfite pyrosequencing technique, our results show that ATRA alone does have some effects on the methylation of individual CpG sites of the target genes; however, the combination treatments are much more effective at demethylating the CpG islands of TGM2 and RARβ promoters (Figs 5–6)14,15,45.

With respect to ATO alone, there are reports of its effects on DNA methylation in APL cells. A recent study showed that 2.0 µM ATO reduced DNA methylation and increased mRNA levels of cell cycle-related genes in NB4 cells56. ATO reduced transcript levels of DNA methyltransferases 1, 3 A and 3B in NB4 cells, which should have genome-wide demethylating effects on DNA56. This is consistent with another study on the cell line HL-60 (an APL-like cell line that lacks the PML-RARα fusion), in which 1 µM ATO modestly reduced global methylation57. This suggests that more so than ATRA14,15,45, 1-2 µM ATO has demethylating effects in APL cells56,57. In our study ATO did not reduce global methylation as measured by LINE-1 methylation, but the higher dose of 1.5 µM ATO did demethylate CpG sites in both NB4 and NB4-MR2 cells. Notably, in ATRA-resistant NB4-MR2 cells, 1.5 µM ATO alone induced the greatest demethylation of the CpG island in the RARβ promoter (Fig. 8A) and RARβ expression (Fig. 4A). However, these effects were not sustained post treatment termination (Figs 8B and 4B). Therefore, in general, our data is in agreement with those studies that concentrations of 1–2 µM ATO has at least some demethylating effects56,57. In future studies, it would be interesting to determine if prolonged continuous treatment of ATRA/ATO (i.e. 168 h of treatment), or if the drugs are administered consecutively instead of in combination, affects differentiation/cell death and methylation of target genes.

Therefore, while ATRA and ATO do appear to have some effects on DNA methylation, it is their combination that induces sustained demethylation of key target genes TGM2 and RARβ post treatment termination (Figs. 5 and 6). Restoration of TGM2 levels in NB4 cells is necessary in ATRA-induced granulocyte differentiation18. The sustained reversal of aberrant methylation of the TGM2 promoter (Fig. 5), and increased transcript levels (Fig. 3B) induced by the combination, could be a key event the sustained differentiation of NB4 cells post treatment termination (Fig. 1E). Notably, in the ATRA-resistant NB4-MR2 cells, TGM2 levels were increased and the gene demethylated by the combination, but these effects were not sustained post treatment termination. Therefore, the lack of sustained effects on DNA methylation could contribute to the resistance of NB4-MR2 cells to treatment.

The results from our gene-specific QPCR and bisulfite pyrosequencing studies highlight the need to perform transcriptome and genome-wide methylation analyses (e.g. whole genome bisulfite sequencing, or EPIC array which measures methylation of over 850,000 CpG sites58,59) on combination ATRA and ATO treated NB4 cells and patient cells. This would reveal if the combination treatment induces sustained gene expression and methylation changes of other target genes with altered expression, while inducing limited genome-wide methylation changes (as suggested by the surrogate LINE-1 methylation levels measured here). Thus far, genomic analyses have been primarily focused on the effects of ATRA only in APL cells15,16; however, with the increasing utilization of ATRA and ATO in the clinic, the effects of the combination of ATRA and ATO on the epigenome and transcriptome needs to be understood. Differences in the effects of combination treatment may be crucial for APL patients who are resistant to therapy and experience disease relapse60. It is also possible that methylation changes of certain target genes (e.g. RARβ, TGM2), could be used as a predictor of complete response. Therefore, an increased understanding of the role of epigenetics in APL treatment response may help in the development of novel strategies to overcome treatment failure, and may also lead to strategies for the application ATRA-based therapies in other cancers61. Potential strategies include the use of demethylating agents such as decitabine or histone decacetylase inhibitors such as vorinostat62, which may improve on the demethylating effects demonstrated in our study.

Supplementary information

41598_2019_45982_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (1.7MB, pdf)

Supplemental methods, figures and tables

Acknowledgements

Support was provided by grant funding to PM from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR, MOP-130304 and PJT-162313), to ICGW from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC, RGPIN-2013-436204) and to THH and KL from the Beatrice Hunter Cancer Research Institute (BHCRI, collaborative grant). TTH was supported by a studentship from the BCHRI, the Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce and a Nova Scotia Research and Innovation Graduate scholarship. DV, MS, and BMC were supported by a Nova Scotia Research and Innovation Graduate scholarship and Killam Laureate scholarship. The flow cytometry data was obtained by accessing Dalhousie University’s Faculty of Medicine Flow Cytometry core facility.

Author Contributions

T.T.H., M.S.: Conception and design, collection and/or assembly of data, data analysis and interpretation, manuscript writing, final approval of manuscript. D.V., C.A.D., B.M.C., K.L., C.-Y.L., R.W.H., D.W.H., D.M.W.: collection and/or assembly of data, data analysis and interpretation, final approval of manuscript. I.C.G.W.: Collection and/or assembly of data, data analysis and interpretation, final approval of manuscript. P.M.: Conception and design, data analysis and interpretation, manuscript writing, final approval of manuscript.

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Thomas T Huynh and Mohammad Sultan contributed equally.

Contributor Information

Ian C. G. Weaver, Email: ian.weaver@dal.ca

Paola Marcato, Email: paola.marcato@dal.ca.

Supplementary information

Supplementary information accompanies this paper at 10.1038/s41598-019-45982-7.

References

  • 1.Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia Facts. (2015).
  • 2.Zhou G-B, Zhang J, Wang Z-Y, Chen S-J, Chen Z. Treatment of acute promyelocytic leukaemia with all-trans retinoic acid and arsenic trioxide: a paradigm of synergistic molecular targeting therapy. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2007;362:959–971. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2007.2026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Warrell RP, de Thé H, Wang ZY, Degos L. Acute promyelocytic leukemia. N. Engl. J. Med. 1993;329:177–189. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199307153290307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.McCraw B. Diagnosing disseminated intravascular coagulopathy in acute promyelocytic leukemia. Clin. J. Oncol. Nurs. 2008;12:717–720. doi: 10.1188/08.CJON.717-720. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Adams J, Nassiri M. Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia A Review and Discussion of Variant Translocations. Arch. Pathol. Lab. Med. 2015;139:1308–13. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2013-0345-RS. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Mueller BU, et al. ATRA resolves the differentiation block in t(15;17) acute myeloid leukemia by restoring PU.1 expression. Blood. 2006;107:3330–8. doi: 10.1182/blood-2005-07-3068. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Kakizuka A, et al. Chromosomal translocation t(15;17) in human acute promyelocytic leukemia fuses RARα with a novel putative transcription factor, PML. Cell. 1991;66:663–674. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90112-C. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Grignani F, et al. Effects on differentiation by the promyelocytic leukemia PML/RARalpha protein depend on the fusion of the PML protein dimerization and RARalpha DNA binding domains. EMBO J. 1996;15:4949–58. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1996.tb00875.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Ablain J, De Th E H. Retinoic acid signaling in cancer: The parable of acute promyelocytic leukemia. Int. J. Cancer. 2014;135:2262–72. doi: 10.1002/ijc.29081. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Zhou J, et al. Dimerization-induced corepressor binding and relaxed DNA-binding specificity are critical for PML/RARA-induced immortalization. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2006;103:9238–9243. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0603324103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Cheung, N. & So, C. W. E. Transcriptional and epigenetic networks in haematological malignancy. FEBS Lett. 585, 2100–2111. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 12.Arteaga MF, et al. The Histone Demethylase PHF8 Governs Retinoic Acid Response in Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia. Cancer Cell. 2013;23:376–389. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2013.02.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Arteaga MF, Mikesch J-H, Fung T-K, So CWE. Epigenetics in acute promyelocytic leukaemia pathogenesis and treatment response: a TRAnsition to targeted therapies. Br. J. Cancer. 2015;112:413–8. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2014.374. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Chim CS, Wong SY, Kwong YL. Aberrant gene promoter methylation in acute promyelocytic leukaemia: profile and prognostic significance. Br. J. Haematol. 2003;122:571–8. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2141.2003.04462.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Martens JHA, et al. PML-RARα/RXR Alters the Epigenetic Landscape in Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia. Cancer Cell. 2010;17:173–185. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2009.12.042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Schoofs T, et al. DNA methylation changes are a late event in acute promyelocytic leukemia and coincide with loss of transcription factor binding. Blood. 2013;121:178–187. doi: 10.1182/blood-2012-08-448860. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Yoshida H, et al. Accelerated degradation of PML-retinoic acid receptor alpha (PML-RARA) oncoprotein by all-trans-retinoic acid in acute promyelocytic leukemia: possible role of the proteasome pathway. Cancer Res. 1996;56:2945–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Csomos K, Nemet I, Fesus L, Balajthy Z. Tissue transglutaminase contributes to the all-trans-retinoic acid-induced differentiation syndrome phenotype in the NB4 model of acute promyelocytic leukemia. Blood. 2010;116:3933–3943. doi: 10.1182/blood-2010-01-266064. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Benedetti L, et al. Retinoid-induced differentiation of acute promyelocytic leukemia involves PML-RARalpha-mediated increase of type II transglutaminase. Blood. 1996;87:1939–50. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Wang Z-Y, Chen Z. Acute promyelocytic leukemia: from highly fatal to highly curable Introduction of ATRA as a differentiation therapy for APL: the first model of targeted therapy for cancer. Blood. 2008;111:2525–15. doi: 10.1182/blood-2007-07-102798. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Castaigne S, et al. All-trans retinoic acid as a differentiation therapy for acute promyelocytic leukemia. I. Clinical results. Blood. 1990;76:1704–1709. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Coombs CC, Tavakkoli M, Tallman MS. Acute promyelocytic leukemia: where did we start, where are we now and the future. Blood Cancer J. 2015;51:e304–e304. doi: 10.1038/bcj.2015.25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Huang ME, et al. Use of all-trans retinoic acid in the treatment of acute promyelocytic leukemia. Blood. 1988;72:567–72. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Fenaux P, et al. Effect of all transretinoic acid in newly diagnosed acute promyelocytic leukemia. Results of a multicenter randomized trial. European APL 91 Group. Blood. 1993;82:3241–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Au W-Y, et al. Oral arsenic trioxide-based maintenance regimens for first complete remission of acute promyelocytic leukemia: a 10-year follow-up study. Blood. 2011;118:6535–6543. doi: 10.1182/blood-2011-05-354530. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Zeidan AM, Gore SD. New Strategies in Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia: Moving to an Entirely Oral, Chemotherapy-Free Upfront Management Approach. Clin. Cancer Res. 2014;20:4985–4993. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-13-2725. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Abaza Y, et al. Long-term outcome of acute promyelocytic leukemia treated with all-trans-retinoic acid, arsenic trioxide, and gemtuzumab. Blood. 2017;129:1275–1283. doi: 10.1182/blood-2016-09-736686. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Estey E, et al. Use of all-trans retinoic acid plus arsenic trioxide as an alternative to chemotherapy in untreated acute promyelocytic leukemia. Blood. 2006;107:3469–3473. doi: 10.1182/blood-2005-10-4006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Shen Z-X, et al. All-trans retinoic acid/As2O3 combination yields a high quality remission and survival in newly diagnosed acute promyelocytic leukemia. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2004;101:5328–5335. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0400053101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Huang J, et al. Induction treatments for acute promyelocytic leukemia: a network meta-analysis. Oncotarget. 2016;7:71974–71986. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.12451. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Zheng P-Z, et al. Systems analysis of transcriptome and proteome in retinoic acid/arsenic trioxide-induced cell differentiation/apoptosis of promyelocytic leukemia. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2005;102:7653–7658. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0502825102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Giannì M, et al. Combined arsenic and retinoic acid treatment enhances differentiation and apoptosis in arsenic-resistant NB4 cells. Blood. 1998;91:4300–10. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Shen Z-X, et al. Use of Arsenic Trioxide (As2O3) in the Treatment of Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia (APL): II. Clinical Efficacy and Pharmacokinetics in Relapsed Patients. Blood. 1997;89:3354–3360. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Rosenauer A, et al. Alterations in expression, binding to ligand and DNA, and transcriptional activity of rearranged and wild-type retinoid receptors in retinoid-resistant acute promyelocytic leukemia cell lines. Blood. 1996;88:2671–82. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Abboud, C. N. et al. NCCN Guidelines Version 3.2018 Acute Myeloid Leukemia. (2019).
  • 36.Osman AEG, et al. Treatment of Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia in Adults. J. Oncol. Pract. 2018;14:649–657. doi: 10.1200/JOP.18.00328. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Muindi JR, et al. Clinical pharmacology of oral all-trans retinoic acid in patients with acute promyelocytic leukemia. Cancer Res. 1992;52:2138–42. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Lefebvre P, et al. Pharmacokinetics of oral all-trans retinoic acid in patients with acute promyelocytic leukemia. Leukemia. 1991;5:1054–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Cui W, et al. Arsenic trioxide at conventional dosage does not aggravate hemorrhage in the first-line treatment of adult acute promyelocytic leukemia. Eur. J. Haematol. 2018;100:344–350. doi: 10.1111/ejh.13018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Fox E, et al. Phase 1 trial and pharmacokinetic study of arsenic trioxide in children and adolescents with refractory or relapsed acute leukemia, including acute promyelocytic leukemia or lymphoma. Blood. 2008;111:566–73. doi: 10.1182/blood-2007-08-107839. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Chen GQ, et al. In vitro studies on cellular and molecular mechanisms of arsenic trioxide (As2O3) in the treatment of acute promyelocytic leukemia: As2O3 induces NB4 cell apoptosis with downregulation of Bcl-2 expression and modulation of PML-RAR alpha/PML proteins. Blood. 1996;88:1052–61. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Chen GQ, et al. Use of arsenic trioxide (As2O3) in the treatment of acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL): I. As2O3 exerts dose-dependent dual effects on APL cells. Blood. 1997;89:3345–53. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Jing Y, et al. Combined effect of all-trans retinoic acid and arsenic trioxide in acute promyelocytic leukemia cells in vitro and in vivo. Blood. 2001;97:264–9. doi: 10.1182/blood.V97.1.264. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Lee K-H, et al. Differential gene expression in retinoic acid-induced differentiation of acute promyelocytic leukemia cells, NB4 and HL-60 cells. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2002;296:1125–1133. doi: 10.1016/S0006-291X(02)02043-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Nouzova M, et al. Epigenomic changes during leukemia cell differentiation: analysis of histone acetylation and cytosine methylation using CpG island microarrays. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2004;311:968–81. doi: 10.1124/jpet.104.072488. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Cruickshanks HA, Tufarelli C. Isolation of cancer-specific chimeric transcripts induced by hypomethylation of the LINE-1 antisense promoter. Genomics. 2009;94:397–406. doi: 10.1016/j.ygeno.2009.08.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Yang AS, et al. A simple method for estimating global DNA methylation using bisulfite PCR of repetitive DNA elements. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004;32:38e–38. doi: 10.1093/nar/gnh032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Ohka F, et al. The Global DNA Methylation Surrogate LINE-1 Methylation Is Correlated with MGMT Promoter Methylation and Is a Better Prognostic Factor for Glioma. PLoS One. 2011;6:e23332. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0023332. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Lisanti S, et al. Comparison of Methods for Quantification of Global DNA Methylation in Human Cells and Tissues. PLoS One. 2013;8:e79044. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0079044. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Mathews LM, Chi SY, Greenberg N, Ovchinnikov I, Swergold GD. Large Differences between LINE-1 Amplification Rates in the Human and Chimpanzee Lineages. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2003;72:739–748. doi: 10.1086/368275. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Cicconi L, Lo-Coco F. Current management of newly diagnosed acute promyelocytic leukemia. Ann. Oncol. 2016;27:1474–1481. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdw171. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Luesink M, et al. Chemokine induction by all-trans retinoic acid and arsenic trioxide in acute promyelocytic leukemia: triggering the differentiation syndrome. Blood. 2009;114:5512–5521. doi: 10.1182/blood-2009-02-204834. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Nayak S, et al. Arsenic trioxide cooperates with all trans retinoic acid to enhance mitogen-activated protein kinase activation and differentiation in PML-RARalpha negative human myeloblastic leukemia cells. Leuk. Lymphoma. 2010;51:1734–47. doi: 10.3109/10428194.2010.501535. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Ghavamzadeh A, et al. Comparison of induction therapy in non-high risk acute promyelocytic leukemia with arsenic trioxide or in combination with ATRA. Leuk. Res. 2018;66:85–88. doi: 10.1016/j.leukres.2018.01.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Croce LD, et al. Methyltransferase Recruitment and DNA Hypermethylation of Target Promoters by an Oncogenic Transcription Factor. Science. 2002;295:1079–1082. doi: 10.1126/science.1065173. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Hassani S, et al. Redistribution of cell cycle by arsenic trioxide is associated with demethylation and expression changes of cell cycle related genes in acute promyelocytic leukemia cell line (NB4) Ann. Hematol. 2018;97:83–93. doi: 10.1007/s00277-017-3163-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Peng C-Y, Jiang J, Zheng H-T, Liu X-S. Growth-inhibiting effects of arsenic trioxide plus epigenetic therapeutic agents on leukemia cell lines. Leuk. Lymphoma. 2010;51:297–303. doi: 10.3109/10428190903486212. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Yong W-S, Hsu F-M, Chen P-Y. Profiling genome-wide DNA methylation. Epigenetics Chromatin. 2016;9:26. doi: 10.1186/s13072-016-0075-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Pidsley R, et al. Critical evaluation of the Illumina MethylationEPIC BeadChip microarray for whole-genome DNA methylation profiling. Genome Biol. 2016;17:208. doi: 10.1186/s13059-016-1066-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Park J, Jurcic JG, Rosenblat T, Tallman MS. Emerging New Approaches for the Treatment of Acute Promyelocytic. Leukemia. Ther. Adv. Hematol. 2011;2:335–352. doi: 10.1177/2040620711410773. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Coyle K, et al. DNA Methylation Predicts the Response of Triple-Negative Breast Cancers to All-Trans Retinoic Acid. Cancers (Basel). 2018;10:397. doi: 10.3390/cancers10110397. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Young CS, Clarke KM, Kettyle LM, Thompson A, Mills KI. Decitabine-Vorinostat combination treatment in acute myeloid leukemia activates pathways with potential for novel triple therapy. Oncotarget. 2017;8:51429–51446. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.18009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

41598_2019_45982_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (1.7MB, pdf)

Supplemental methods, figures and tables

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES