Skip to main content
. 2019 Jun 3;47(8):1854–1862. doi: 10.1177/0363546519849476

Table 3.

Univariate Analysis of Factors Associated With RTS (Yes vs No) After HTO a

Outcome Measure RTS (n = 210) No RTS (n = 46) P Value
Mean age at surgery, y (SD) 50.4 (9.2) 48.7 (8.2) .25 b
Mean follow-up, y (SD) 3.7 (1.0) 3.6 (1.1) .27 b
Female sex, n (%) 81 (39) 20 (43) .54 c
Mean BMI, kg/m2 (SD) 27.1 (3.8) 28.5 (4.1) .04 b
Side, right (%) 106 (50) 24 (52) .84 c
ASA classification, n (%)
 I 131 (62) 23 (50) .25 c
 II 78 (37) 23 (50)
 III 1 (1)
Indication, n (%)
 Varus OA 168 (80) 38 (83) .69 c
 Valgus OA 42 (20) 8 (17)
Wedge size, mm (SD) 9.2 (3.2) 9.7 (3.3) .39 b
Level of impact 1 year preoperatively, n (%)
 Low 43 (25) 14 (47) .04 c
 Intermediate 64 (38) 6 (20)
 High 62 (37) 10 (33)
Sports participation 1 year preoperatively, n (%)
 Yes 169 (80) 28 (61) <.01 c
 No 41 (20) 18 (39)
a

Boldface type indicates statistical significance at P < .10. ASA, American Society of Anesthesiologists; BMI, body mass index; HTO, high tibial osteotomy; OA, osteoarthritis; RTS, return to sport; —, no data available.

b

Independent samples t test.

c

Chi-square test or Fisher exact test in cases with <5 expected counts.