Skip to main content
The Journal of Neuroscience logoLink to The Journal of Neuroscience
. 2015 Jun 10;35(23):8970. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1511-15.2015

Correction: Yu et al., Neural Substrates of Intention–Consequence Integration and Its Impact on Reactive Punishment in Interpersonal Transgression

PMCID: PMC6605203

For the article “Neural Substrates of Intention–Consequence Integration and Its Impact on Reactive Punishment in Interpersonal Transgression” by Hongvo Yu, Jia Li, and Xiaolin Zhou, which appeared on pages 4917–4925 of the March 25, 2015 issue, the authors wish to make four corrections listed below. These corrections do not affect the main conclusions and interpretations of the paper.

  1. On page 4917, a grant number and Miss Li Zhang and Mr. Philip Blue were erroneously omitted from the acknowledgments. The correct acknowledgments are as follows: This work was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of China (Grants 91232708, 31170972) and the National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program: 2010CB833904, 2015CB856400). We thank Xirui Cui, Huihui Zheng, Yunlu Yin, Li Zhang, and Dr. Li Hu for their assistance in data collection and data analysis; and Dr. Micheal Treadway, Mr. Philip Blue, and two anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments on previous versions of this manuscript.

  2. On page 4917, in the first paragraph of the Introduction, fourth line, a reference is missing. The corrected sentence is as follows: … when evaluating the actions of others and forming reactive attitudes (Strawson, 2008) or behaviors …

  3. In Figure 1C's legend, the corrected text is as follows: In the fMRI experiment, the punishment amount in the Harm_No-harm (i.e., failed-attempt) condition positively correlated with the trait revenge score.

  4. In the last paragraph of the Results, second column on page 4922, the first sentence should read as follows: The individual differences analysis revealed that the activation in the rAI in the accidental condition negatively correlated with trait forgiveness (r = −0.32, p = 0.068; Fig. 3C), while the activation in the rTPJ in the failed-attempt condition positively correlated with trait revenge (r = 0.38, p = 0.029; Fig. 3D).


Articles from The Journal of Neuroscience are provided here courtesy of Society for Neuroscience

RESOURCES