Abstract
Autophagy is a highly regulated catabolic pathway that is potently induced by stressors including starvation and infection. An essential component of the autophagy pathway is an ATG16L1‐containing E3‐like enzyme, which is responsible for lipidating LC3B and driving autophagosome formation. ATG16L1 polymorphisms have been linked to the development of Crohn's disease (CD), and phosphorylation of CD‐associated ATG16L1 T300A (caATG16L1) has been hypothesized to contribute to cleavage and autophagy dysfunction. Here we show that ULK1 kinase directly phosphorylates ATG16L1 in response to infection and starvation. Phosphorylated ATG16L1 localizes to the site of internalized bacteria and stable cell lines harbouring a phospho‐dead mutant of ATG16L1 have impaired xenophagy, indicating a role for ATG16L1 phosphorylation in the promotion of anti‐bacterial autophagy. In contrast to wild‐type ATG16L1, ULK1‐mediated phosphorylation of caATG16L1 drives its destabilization in response to stress. In summary, our results show that ATG16L1 is a novel target of ULK1 kinase and that ULK1 signalling to ATG16L1 is a double‐edged sword, enhancing the function of the wild‐type ATG16L1, but promoting degradation of caATG16L1.
Keywords: ATG16L1, autophagy, caspase, Crohn's disease, ULK1
Subject Categories: Autophagy & Cell Death; Microbiology, Virology & Host Pathogen Interaction; Molecular Biology of Disease
Introduction
Macroautophagy (hereafter referred to as autophagy) is a cellular degradative process capable of degrading a vast array of substrates including cytoplasm, organelles, aggregated macromolecules and pathogens 1. Autophagic cargo is first sequestered by the formation a double‐membraned vesicle called an autophagosome, which matures into a degradative vesicle after fusion with lysosomes. Autophagosome formation is driven by a set of autophagy‐related (ATG) genes, which include a protein kinase (Unc 51‐like kinase 1; ULK1), a lipid kinase (vacuolar protein sorting 34; VPS34) and a trimeric E3‐like enzyme (ATG5‐ATG12/ATG16L1) 1. These enzymes are all required for autophagy initiation and are tightly regulated by upstream stress‐sensitive signalling. One of the best characterized upstream regulators of the autophagy pathway is mTORC1, which potently inhibits autophagy induction through direct phosphorylation of the ULK1 and VPS34 kinase complexes 2, 3, 4, 5. mTORC1 activity is repressed, thereby allowing autophagy induction, in response to a myriad of stressors including nutrient or cytokine starvation, reactive oxygen species or infection 6, 7, 8.
Mammals have two homologues of the yeast ATG1, ULK1 and ULK2, which are largely functionally redundant for autophagy induction 9. Under basal conditions, mTORC1‐mediated phosphorylation represses ULK1 activity; however, starvation releases this inhibitory phosphorylation and upregulates ULK1 2. Activated ULK1 then phosphorylates several components of the pro‐autophagic ATG14‐containing VPS34 complexes 10, 11, 12. Autophagic VPS34 complexes are recruited to the phagophore where they phosphorylate phosphatidylinositol (PtdIns) to produce phosphatidylinositol(3)phosphate (PtdIns(3)P) 13. PtdIns(3)P functions as a platform bridging downstream components like the ATG16L1 complex to promote autophagosome formation. Additionally, mTORC1 has been shown to directly mediate the activity of VPS34 complexes, thereby allowing a tight regulation of autophagy initiation in response to stresses 3. Downstream of VPS34, ATG16L1 forms a trimeric complex with ATG5 and ATG12. ATG16L1 is the subunit responsible for recruiting the E3‐like enzyme to the phagophore 1, 14. ATG12 acts to recruit microtubule‐associated protein 1 light chain 3 (LC3) to the expanding autophagosomal membrane, and ATG5 catalyzes the conjugation of the ubiquitin‐like LC3 to phosphatidylethanolamine in membranes of nascent autophagosomes, thereby driving their development.
Activation of anti‐bacterial autophagy (hereafter referred to as xenophagy) involves these 3‐key enzymes in the autophagy pathway, but also requires xenophagy‐specific proteins involved in pathogen‐sensing that signal to the autophagy machinery during infection 8. For instance, galectin‐8 detects damaged Salmonella‐containing vacuoles (SCV) and subsequently activates xenophagy through recruitment of the autophagy receptor NDP52 15. Immunity‐related GTPase M (IRGM) has been shown to act as a scaffold bringing together ULK1, Beclin‐1‐containing VPS34 complexes and ATG16L1 to promote xenophagy initiation 16. In addition to IRGM, ATG16L1‐containing enzyme is also regulated by activation of intracellular (NOD2) sensors of bacterial peptidoglycan, where NOD2 binds ATG16L1 recruiting the LC3‐lipidating enzyme to the site of bacterial infection 17.
Interestingly, several of the proteins involved in xenophagy induction (ATG16L1 and IRGM) and pathogen detection (NOD2 and TLR4) have been linked to Crohn's disease (CD), but are not found in the related chronic inflammatory bowel disease ulcerative colitis (UC) 18. Genome‐wide association studies have linked a non‐synonymous single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) in ATG16L1 that substitutes threonine 300 for alanine with an increased susceptibility for CD 19. Molecular characterization of the CD‐associated ATG16L1 (caATG16L1) has shown that stresses such as starvation or pathogen infection enhance the susceptibility of caATG16L1 to caspase‐mediated cleavage 20, 21, 22, 23. Enhanced cleavage of caATG16L1 has been shown to lead to an increase in inflammatory cytokine secretion and a decrease in xenophagy, which are thought to contribute to CD 21, 24, 25, 26. Interestingly, a recent study has found that IκB kinase subunit IKKα is capable of phosphorylating ATG16L1 on serine 278 (S278), which regulates the sensitivity of caATG16L1 to caspase cleavage 24. The caspase cleavage site on ATG16L1 lies in between the S278 phosphorylation site and the T300A Crohn's SNP. This raises the interesting possibility that phosphorylation of ATG16L1 in response to infection leads to inappropriate cleavage if the site is in close proximity to the T300A mutation. ATG16L1 contains several conserved serine/threonine residues proximal to T300, which may also be phosphorylated and may potentially regulate ATG16L1 function. However, it remains to be seen what effect phosphorylation has on wild‐type ATG16L1 and if other stressors or kinases regulate ATG16L1 phosphorylation.
Results and Discussion
ATG16L1 is phosphorylated by ULK1/2
Starvation has been described to trigger caspase‐mediated cleavage of ATG16L1 containing a common amino acid substitution (T300A) 21. However, IKKα has not been implicated in starvation‐induced autophagy. Interestingly, ATG16L1 has been shown to bind FIP200, an essential co‐factor of the ULK1 kinase complex. The interaction of ATG16L1 with FIP200 has been shown to be involved in regulating ATG16L1 localization in autophagy induction 27, 28. Therefore, we hypothesized that ULK1/2, the only protein kinases in the autophagy pathway, may phosphorylate ATG16L1 under starvation. To test this hypothesis, we performed an in vitro kinase assay using either purified ULK1 or ULK2 with recombinant ATG16L1 as substrate. We found that both ULK1 and ULK2 were capable of phosphorylating ATG16L1 in vitro (Fig 1A). In order to narrow down the site of phosphorylation, we repeated the kinase assay using truncations of ATG16L1. We found that the truncation mutant lacking amino acids 254–294 was a very poor substrate for ULK1, indicating that the primary site(s) of ULK1‐mediated phosphorylation are located in this region (Fig 1B). Amino acids 254–294 are serine/threonine rich, containing 10 conserved residues (Fig 1C). Therefore, to identify the residue(s) that are phosphorylated by ULK1 in this region we repeated the kinase assay on full‐length ATG16L1 and performed mass spectrometry analysis. Our results revealed a single high confidence phosphorylation site on serine 278 (Fig EV1A and marked in green in Fig 1C) and another of slightly lower confidence on serine 287 (Fig EV1A and marked in grey in Fig 1C), both of which map to the region of ATG16L1 we previously identified as required for ULK1‐mediated phosphorylation (Fig 1B). Peptide coverage in the mass spectrometry was 80% across the whole protein, and only two S/T residues were missed in the putative 254–294 region. To confirm the major site(s) of phosphorylation on ATG16L1, we mutated S278 and S287 singly in the full‐length protein and performed another in vitro ULK1 kinase assay. Interestingly, we observed a significant loss of ULK1‐mediated phosphorylation in the S278A mutant and little reduction in the S287A mutant (Fig 1D). This indicates that the major site of phosphorylation on ATG16L1 is S278, which is the same residue previously identified as a site for IKKα–mediated phosphorylation 24. Next, we created phospho‐specific antibodies against S278 or S287 of ATG16L1 and tested its specificity by co‐transfection of wild‐type or mutant ULK1 and ATG16L1. Excitingly, we observed that ULK1 phosphorylates ATG16L1 on S278 in cells and that our antibody was specific to the phosphorylated form of the protein with little to no signal against ATG16L1 (S278A) or wild‐type ATG16L1 co‐transfected with kinase‐dead ULK1 (Fig 1E). Despite good specificity for our S287 antibody (Fig EV1B and C), we observed that the lower probability site obtained by mass spectrometry, S287, was not phosphorylated in an ULK1‐dependent manner (Fig 1E). Collectively, these results show that ATG16L1 is a direct target of ULK1 and that the primary site of phosphorylation is S278.
ULK1 is required for phosphorylation of ATG16L1 and xenophagy induction
We next sought to determine whether ULK1 regulated ATG16L1 phosphorylation endogenously and whether this signalling was responsive to starvation. ULK1/2 wild‐type or ULK1/2 double‐knockout (dKO) cells were starved for amino acids, either with amino acid‐free DMEM or HBSS, followed by analysis of pATG16L1 levels by western blot of whole‐cell extracts. Starvation potently inhibits mTORC1 signalling, as demonstrated by loss of S6K phosphorylation, which is a prerequisite for ULK1 activation. Importantly, we observed that starvation resulted in a clear increase in endogenous ATG16L1 phosphorylation only in cells containing ULK1 (Figs 2A and EV2A, lanes 1–6). We found that ablation of ULK1‐mediated phosphorylation of ATG16L1 had no effect on the stability of the ATG16L1/5‐12 complex (Fig EV2B). Notably, our phospho‐antibody only recognizes the slower migrating ATG16L1β isoform and is observed as a single band. As IKKα was previously described to phosphorylate ATG16L1 on S278 under infection, we also tested the requirement for IKKα in starvation‐induced ATG16L1 phosphorylation. However, we observed that IKKα deficiency had no detectable effect on starvation‐induced ATG16L1 phosphorylation (Fig 2A, lanes 7–9). This is perhaps expected as IKKα has no known role in starvation‐induced autophagy. This result indicates that the ATG16L1 subunit of the LC3‐lipidating enzyme is a direct and physiological target of ULK1 under starvation. We next asked if ULK1/2 or IKKα contributed to ATG16L1 phosphorylation upon infection or TNFα treatment. ULK1/2 wild‐type, ULK1/2 dKO or IKKα KO cells were infected with Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium (hereafter referred to as Salmonella) or treated with TNFα, and ATG16L1 phosphorylation was examined by western blot. Surprisingly, we observed that Salmonella and TNFα‐induced ATG16L1 phosphorylation was abolished in ULK1/2 dKO cells, but was still observed in IKKα knockout cells (Figs 2B and EV2C). Of note, phospho‐ATG16L1 signal is consistently lower under infection as only a small minority of cells are subjected to the stress of internalized bacteria (Fig EV2D). These results clearly indicate that ULK1/2 is required for phosphorylation of ATG16L1 under starvation, inflammatory cytokine signalling and infection.
We next sought to determine the requirement for ULK1/2 and IKKα in promoting xenophagy. Xenophagic clearance of Salmonella is very well established and its intracellular growth is restricted by the pathway, making it an ideal model pathogen for this analysis. Wild‐type or knockout cells were infected with Salmonella, and the number of LC3B‐positive Salmonella was quantified. LC3B is conjugated to the autophagosomal membrane and colocalizes with bacteria targeted for clearance by xenophagy and can be used at early time points to monitor xenophagy induction. We found that ULK1/2‐deficient cells exhibited a potent decrease in LC3B‐positive bacteria, while IKKα loss did not significantly affect xenophagy (Figs 2C and EV2E and F). In order to confirm the roles for ULK1/2 and IKKα in xenophagy induction and suppression of invasive bacteria, we performed colony‐forming unit (CFU) assays in our wild‐type or knockout lines. CFU assays measure bacterial viability after internalization and are inversely correlated with xenophagy rates 29. Analysis of Salmonella viability 4 h postinfection revealed that ULK1/2 dKO cells harboured a much higher number of viable internalized bacteria, indicative of an autophagy defect, when compared to wild‐type and IKKα knockout cells (Fig 2D). Surprisingly, our results indicate that ULK1/2, but not IKKα, is required for ATG16L1 phosphorylation and xenophagy induction.
ULK1 promotes cleavage of caATG16L1 through phosphorylation on S278
Multiple groups have shown that the T300A substitution in caATG16L1 renders it sensitive to caspase cleavage under stress conditions including nutrient starvation and infection 21, 24, 30. Moreover, it was shown that mutation of serine 278 of ATG16L1 to alanine is involved in stress‐induced caspase cleavage in the caATG16L1 background 24. Our data indicate that ULK1 is responsible for the phosphorylation of wild‐type ATG16L1 on S278 under nutrient starvation and infection. Therefore, we next sought to determine whether ULK1 signalling was involved in the stress‐induced destabilization of caATG16L1. HEK293A cells were transfected with either wild‐type ATG16L1 or caATG16L1 co‐transfected with increasing amounts of ULK1 kinase. Importantly, overexpression of ULK1 is known to result in autoactivation and induction of downstream signalling in the absence of stress, thereby allowing us to determine the isolated effect of ULK1 signalling on ATG16L1 stability independent of other stress‐responsive pathways. Interestingly, we observed that ULK1 is capable of stimulating ATG16L1 cleavage and the level of cleavage is elevated in the caATG16L1 background (Fig 3A). In order to determine whether ATG16L1 cleavage was a result of ULK1‐mediated phosphorylation on S278, we transfected HEK293A cells with wild‐type, T300A or S278/T300A mutants of ATG16L1 in the presence or absence of ULK1. Excitingly, we observed that single mutation of the ULK1 phosphorylation site was sufficient to reduce ULK1‐driven cleavage (Fig 3B). As expected mutation of S287, the low confidence ULK1 phosphorylation site identified by mass spectrometry, had no impact on cleavage in the T300A background (Fig EV3A). These results indicate that caATG16L1 is preferentially cleaved through ULK1‐mediated phosphorylation of S278. Conversely, we found that T300A did not have any effect on ATG16L1 phosphorylation (Fig EV3B). Lastly, we repeated this experiment in the presence or absence of Z‐VAD‐FMK, a pan‐caspase inhibitor, to confirm the faster migrating form of ATG16L1 was indeed a product of caspase‐mediated cleavage. Treatment with a pan‐caspase inhibitor resulted in a potent reduction in the levels of the faster migrating ATG16L1 band, confirming that the ULK1‐driven cleavage product was a caspase cleavage product (Fig 3C). Increasing evidence in vitro and in vivo has shown that caspase‐mediated destabilization of caATG16L1 is a critical event associated with the pathobiology of this SNP 21, 24. Moreover, in unstressed conditions caATG16L1 is known to have the same stability as wild type 21. To study the effect of ULK1‐mediated caspase cleavage of ATG16L1 in cells, we knocked out ATG16L1 using CRISPR/Cas9 (Fig EV3C) and transfected ATG16L1(T300A) in HEK293A cells and infected cells in the presence or absence of ULK inhibitor. Interestingly, we observed Salmonella treatment destabilized the T300A mutant, which could be reversed with ULK inhibitor (Fig 3D). However, ATG16L1(WT) stability was not drastically affected by either Salmonella or ULK inhibition (Fig 3D). We also found ATG16L1(T300A) was stabilized by ULK inhibitors under TNFα treatment (Fig EV3D). We next sought to determine the function of S278 phosphorylation of ATG16L1 in both the wild‐type and T300A background. ATG16L1 knockout cells were transfected with ATG16L1 (WT, S278A, T300A or S278A/T300A) at similar levels and treated with Salmonella (Fig EV3E). Quantification of Salmonella at 4 h postinfection showed that mutation of S278 phosphorylation in the wild‐type background resulted in an increase in Salmonella, indicating ULK1 phosphorylation may act to promote xenophagy in wild‐type ATG16L1 (Fig 3E, columns 1 and 2). Conversely, in the T300A background S278A mutation improved Salmonella clearance, indicating ULK1 phosphorylation is detrimental in this background (Fig 3E, columns 3 and 4).
Collectively, our data shed light on the relationship between stress and caATG16L1 cleavage showing that: (i) ULK1‐mediated phosphorylation of ATG16L1 is increased under infection and starvation, which are known to promote the cleavage of caATG16L1, (ii) caATG16L1 is preferentially cleaved upon ULK1 activation, and (iii) mutating the ULK1 phosphorylation site reduces ULK1‐driven cleavage and improves xenophagy in the caATG16L1 background.
ULK1‐mediated phosphorylation is required for ATG16L1 localization to Salmonella site and bacterial clearance
ULK1 kinase has a well‐established role in stimulating autophagy, making it unlikely that the primary function of ULK1‐induced ATG16L1 phosphorylation is to activate caspase‐mediated cleavage. In order to identify the physiological role of ULK1‐mediated ATG16L1 phosphorylation, we performed experiments on the wild‐type protein, which is not cleaved as readily after phosphorylation. The best described function of ATG16L1 is to promote the correct localization of the E3‐like enzyme that lipidates LC3 to the membrane of newly forming autophagosomes. Therefore, we first sought to determine whether the localization of pATG16L1 differed from that of total ATG16L1 under infection. To compare localization, we infected MEF with Salmonella and immunostained for lipopolysaccharides (LPS), pATG16L1 and total ATG16L1. We observed pATG16L1 primarily in the infected samples, confirming the reactivity of our antibody for IF (Fig 4A). Excitingly, we found that pATG16L1 was preferentially localized with internalized bacteria (Fig 4A). Analysis of total ATG16L1 staining also showed colocalization with bacteria, but also contained significantly more diffuse staining in the cytoplasm (Figs 4A, and EV4A and B). This could indicate that either ULK1‐mediated phosphorylation is important for ATG16L1 recruitment to bacteria, or that the phosphorylation occurs at the bacteria. We reasoned if phosphorylation of ATG16L1 affects bacterial localization, then ULK1‐deficient cells should exhibit an impairment in ATG16L1 recruitment to pathogen. To test this hypothesis, we infected wild‐type or ULK1‐deficient cells and quantified the ability of total ATG16L1 to localize to internalized bacteria. Interestingly, we observed that the proportion of ATG16L1‐positive bacteria in ULK1‐deficient MEF was reduced by over 80% compared with the wild‐type controls (Figs 4B, and EV4C and D).
In order to determine the contribution of S278 phosphorylation on ATG16L1 localization to bacteria, we reconstituted ATG16L1 KO cells with either wild‐type ATG16L1, a truncated form of ATG16L1 that cannot bind the ULK1 complex, or the SS278A mutant and analysed localization to intracellular bacteria. We observed that mutation of S278 or deleting the region of ATG16L1 responsible for binding the ULK1 complex resulted in a significant reduction in ATG16L1‐positive bacteria (Figs 4C, and EV4E and F). We then looked at colocalization between LC3B and Salmonella in our ATG16L mutants. We observed that the S278A mutant of ATG16L1 in the wild‐type background resulted in a reduction in LC3B‐positive bacteria (Figs 4D, and EV5A and B). Accordingly, the S278A and Δ229–242 mutants of ATG16L1 were both defective in clearing intracellular Salmonella as determined by CFU assay (Fig EV5C). In contrast, S278A mutation in the T300A background increased the percentage of LC3B‐positive Salmonella (Fig EV5A and B), which was also consistent with the decreased bacterial load observed in our CFU assay (Fig 3E).
To determine the role of ULK1‐mediated ATG16L1 phosphorylation in starvation, we starved cells reconstituted with either wild‐type ATG16L1 or ATG16L1(S278A). Surprisingly, we found that S278 mutation had no effect on starvation‐induced autophagy flux (Fig EV5D). These data indicate that either ULK1‐mediated phosphorylation of ATG16L1 is more important under infection than starvation or additional functionally redundant signalling pathways to ATG16L1 are activated by starvation. Taken together, our data indicate that ULK1‐mediated phosphorylation of wild‐type ATG16L1 acts to promote localization to internalized bacteria and thereby enhancing bacterial removal, while the same modification is detrimental in caATG16L1 (Fig 4E).
ULK1 has previously been described to phosphorylate several components of the autophagy‐promoting lipid kinase complex to activate the autophagy pathway 10, 11, 12. Here we have described that the autophagy E3‐like enzyme is also regulated by ULK1 through direct phosphorylation of the ATG16L1 subunit. The discovery of a link between ULK1 and the LC3B‐lipidating enzyme has raised several interesting lines of inquiry. For example, we have shown that wild‐type ATG16L1 is also susceptible to ULK1‐sensitive caspase‐mediated cleavage, albeit at a lower level than caATG16L1. However, we currently do not know the physiological relationship between phosphorylation and caspase‐mediated cleavage outside the context of the caATG16L1 allele. Potentially, caspase‐mediated cleavage of ATG16L1 under stress represents a mechanism to curtail autophagy under severe or prolonged stress. Understanding the mechanistic link between apoptosis and autophagy may yield important conceptual advances.
Additionally, we have uncovered a role for ULK1 signalling in CD through regulating the stability of caATG16L1. Interestingly, the functional significance of the S278 residue in CD had already been shown 24. However, the lack of tools to measure endogenous pATG16L1 resulted in IKKα being identified as the kinase responsible for the phosphorylation and triggering the cleavage of caATG16L1. Based on our data, as well as the previously reported link between starvation and pathogen‐induced caATG16L1 dysfunction, we propose that ULK1 is the primary kinase responsible for ATG16L1 phosphorylation. However, it is quite possible that IKKα contributes to the destabilization of caATG16L1 through the previously reported activation of caspases 24.
The preferential localization of pATG16L1 to internalized bacteria is also interesting. This is because frameshifts in the gene NOD2 are strongly associated with CD development and have also been described to affect ATG16L1 localization to internalized bacteria 17. This may imply a common defect of ATG16L1 function in CD. Consistent with this idea, CD‐associated SNPs have also been described in ULK1, albeit with less strength than ATG16L1 SNPs. Here we have identified a functional redundancy between ULK1 and ULK2 in the promotion of ATG16L1 phosphorylation, which may explain the weak contribution of ULK1 polymorphisms in CD susceptibility. Lastly, transcriptional repression of IRGM has also been linked to the development of CD. Molecularly, IRGM has been shown to bind both ULK1 and ATG16L1, although they have not been shown in a complex together. Therefore, it would be of value to determine whether reductions in IRGM protein would have an effect on ULK1‐mediated ATG16L1 phosphorylation. Clearly, the identification of ULK1‐mediated ATG16L1 phosphorylation has opened up several avenues for future research, which will undoubtedly expand our understanding of xenophagy and the molecular basis of autophagy defects in CD.
Material and Methods
Antibodies and reagents
Anti‐IKKα (Cat#2682), HA‐HRP (#Cat 2999), phospho‐NF‐κB S536 (Cat#3033), ATG5 (Cat#12994), NF‐κB (Cat# 8242) and phospho‐S6K T389 (Cat#9234) antibodies were obtained from Cell Signaling Technology. Anti‐LC3B (Cat#PM036 for immunofluorescence) and ATG16L1 (Cat#PM040 for immunofluorescence) antibodies were purchased from MBL. Beta‐actin (Cat#A5441 clone AC‐15) and vinculin (Cat#V9131) antibodies were obtained from Sigma. DYKDDDDK Epitope Tag (Cat#NBP1‐06712 for WB) antibody was purchased from Novus Biologicals. Anti‐LPS FITC (Cat#sc‐52223) and GST (Cat# sc‐374171) antibodies were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology. Anti‐S6K (Cat#ab32529), LPS (Cat#ab128709), ATG16L1 (Cat#ab187671) antibodies and TNFα (Cat#ab9642) were obtained from Abcam. phospho‐ATG16L1 serine 278 was made in collaboration with Abcam. Polyclonal sera was affinity purified by phosphopeptide, and recombinant ATG16L1 (non‐phosphorylated) was mixed in at a 6:1 molar ratio (Rec. ATG16L1: IgG), prior to immunoblotting. Monoclonal phospho‐antibody from a hybridoma generated from this rabbit was used for immunofluorescence (Abcam Cat#ab195242). Active GST‐ULK1 (1‐649) and GST‐ULK2 (1‐478) from insect cells were purchased from CQuential Solutions (Moraga, CA). Anti‐His‐HRP (Cat#460707) was obtained from Invitrogen. Z‐VAD(OMe)‐FMK (Cat#HY‐16658‐1MG) was purchased from MedChemExpress. Bafilomycin A1 was obtained from Tocris (Cat#133410U). ULK‐inhibitor MRT68921 was obtained from Selleckchem (Cat#S7949). Digitonin (Cat#10188‐874) was obtained from VWR.
Cell culture
MEFs, HEK293A and HCT116 cells were cultured in DMEM supplemented with 10% bovine calf serum (VWR Life Science Seradigm). IKK wild‐type and IKKα knockout MEF cells were a generous gift from Dr. Michael Karin (University of California San Diego) 31. ULK1/2 double‐knockout MEF cells were a generous gift from Dr. Craig Thompson (Memorial Sloan Kettering) 32. Amino acid starvation medium was prepared based on Gibco standard recipe omitting all amino acids and supplemented as above without addition of non‐essential amino acids and substitution with dialysed FBS (Invitrogen). Media was changed 1 h before experiments.
Transfection
HEK293A cells were transfected with tagged ATG16L1 (750 ng) and tagged ULK1 (250 ng) using polyethylenimine (PEI, medistore uOttawa). HCT116 cells were transfected with the indicated tagged ATG16L1 (3–5 μg) using PEI. The samples were analysed 48–72 h post‐transfection.
Generation of knock‐out cell lines using CRISPR/Cas9
ATG16L1 knock‐out lines were generated in the HCT116 or HEK293A backgrounds utilizing CRISPR/Cas9 targeting exon 1. Guide RNA sequence: 5′ AAACCCGCTGGAAGCGCCACATCTC 3′.
Generation of stable cell lines
The knock‐out clones were infected with retroviruses or lentiviruses carrying tagged ATG16L1 at different amounts in order to achieve near endogenous levels of ATG16L1.
Site‐directed mutagenesis
Primers used for T300A mutation are GGACAATGTGGATGCTCATCCTGGTTC (forward) and GAACCAGGATGAGCATCCACATTGTCC (reverse). Primers used for S278A mutation are GCCTTCTGGATGCTATCACTAATATC (forward) and GATATTAGTGATTGCATCCAGAAGGC (reverse). Primers used for S287A mutation are TTTGGGAGACGCGCTGTCTCTTCCT (forward) and AGGAAGAGACAGCGCGTCTCCCAAA (reverse). T300A followed by S278A or S287A mutation was performed to generate double mutations. Site‐directed mutagenesis was performed based on KOD Xtreme Hot Start DNA Polymerase kit instructions purchased from Thermo Fisher. Specificity of mutagenesis was analysed by direct sequencing.
Bacterial strains
Wild‐type (SL1344) Salmonella was a gift from Dr. Subash Sad (University of Ottawa). Bacteria were grown in Luria‐Bertani broth (Fisher).
Bacterial infection
Salmonella were grown in 4 ml of LB broth at 37°C at 250 rpm. Overnight cultures of Salmonella were diluted 30‐fold and grown until OD600 reached 1.5, followed by centrifugation of 10,000 g for 2 min, and resuspension in 1 ml of PBS. Bacterial stock was then diluted fivefold (multiplicity of infection of 900) in DMEM supplied with 10% heat‐inactivated bovine calf serum for infection. Cells cultured in antibiotic‐free medium were infected with Salmonella and incubated at 37°C in 5% CO2 for the indicated time. Cells were washed in PBS once before direct lysis with 1× denaturing SDS sample buffer.
Western blot and immunoprecipitation
Whole‐cell lysates were prepared by direct lysis with 1× SDS sample buffer. Samples were boiled for 10 min at 95°C and resolved by SDS–PAGE. Immune complexes were harvested from cells lysed in mild lysis buffer [10 mM Tris pH 7.5, 10 mM EDTA, 100 mM NaCl, 50 mM NaF, 1% NP‐40, supplemented simultaneously with protease and phosphatase inhibitor cocktails—EDTA (APExBIO)], followed by centrifugation at max speed for 10 min to remove cell debris. Protein A beads (Repligen) were washed 1× with PBS and incubated with antibodies and cell lysates for 1.5–3 h followed by one 5‐m wash with MLB and inhibitors and four quick washes with MLB alone. Beads were boiled in 1× denaturing sample buffer for 10 min before resolving by SDS–PAGE.
Statistical analysis
Error bars for western blot analysis represent the standard deviation between densitometry data collected from three unique biological experiments. Statistical significance was determined using paired Student's two‐tailed t‐test for two data sets.
Immunofluorescence
Cells were plated on IBDI‐treated coverslips overnight. After treatments, cells were fixed by 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS for 15 min and subsequently permeabilized with 50 μg/ml digitonin in PBS for 10 min at room temperature. Cells were blocked in blocking buffer (1% BSA and 2% serum in PBS) for 30 min, followed by incubation with primary antibodies in the same buffer for 1 h at room temperature. Samples were then washed 2× in PBS and 1× in blocking buffer before incubation with secondary antibodies 1 h at room temperature. Slides were washed 3× in PBS, stained with DAPI and mounted. Images were captured with inverted epifluorescent Zeiss AxioObserver.Z1. In the case of outside/inside bacterial staining, before permeabilization, the cells were incubated with anti‐LPS antibody and corresponding secondary antibody in blocking buffer, accompanied by 3× PBS washes in between.
Quantification of immunofluorescence
An automated protocol built in the ImageJ software was used to analyse epifluorescent microscopy images to avoid bias. The same protocol was applied to each field of view and across samples. An average of eight unique fields of view from representative experiments was selected for quantification.
In vitro ULK1 kinase assay
HEK293A transiently expressing tagged ATG16L1 was immunoprecipitated. Pull‐down proteins were washed 3× with MLB and 1× with MOPS buffer and were used as substrates for ULK1 kinase assay. ULK1 proteins were immunoprecipitated and extensively washed with MLB (once) and RIPA buffer (50 mM Tris at pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 50 mM NaF, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM EGTA, 1% SDS, 1% Triton X‐100 and 0.5% deoxycholate) once, followed by washing with MLB buffer once followed by equilibration with ULK1 assay buffer (kinase base buffer supplemented with 0.05 mM DTT, 10 μM cold ATP and 0.4 μCil 32P‐ATP per reaction). Reactions were shaken at 250 rpm at 37°C for 30 min and stopped by direct addition of 4× sample buffer followed by 10‐min boiling at 95°C and resolution by SDS–PAGE. The analysis of kinase reactions necessitated the separation of the kinase and substrate. In vitro kinase reactions were analysed by autoradiograms.
Colony‐forming unit assay
Cells were infected with Salmonella (MOI of 180) for 1 h. The infected cells were washed 2× and incubated with media containing 100 μg/ml Gentamicin for 0.5 h, followed by 4‐h incubation with media containing 50 μg/ml Gentamicin. The samples were rinsed 3× with PBS and lysed with CFU buffer (0.1% Triton X‐100 and 0.01% SDS in PBS). The harvested lysates were serially diluted (1:100, 1:300 and 1:1,000) and plated onto LB agar plates containing Streptomycin. The plates were incubated at 37°C for 16–18 h, and the colonies were counted to determine the number of CFU.
Author contributions
TTL, RMA and RCR wrote the manuscript. RMA and TTL were primarily responsible for data production in all figures. WT assayed endogenous pATG16L1(S278) levels under stress. AJ characterized pATG16L1(S287) function and validated the phospho‐antibody. ZG performed quantification of IF images. RCR and DCR oversaw manuscript preparation, experimental planning. RCR conceived of the study.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Supporting information
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank members of the Russell laboratory for advice and critical reading of this manuscript. We the authors would like to apologize to colleagues whose significant work could not be included due to length, citation limitations or author oversight. This work was supported by Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) Project Grants awarded to RCR (#PJT153034), the UK Dementia Research Institute (funded by MRC, Alzheimer's Research UK and the Alzheimer's Society), Wellcome Trust [Principal Research Fellowship to DCR (095317/Z/11/Z)], Strategic Grant to Cambridge Institute for Medical Research (100140/Z/12/Z) and studentship to AJ, and the Roger de Spoelberch Foundation. Academic scholarship from the Government of Saudi Arabia (#5976670433) and studentship supported RA. TTL was supported by an Ontario Graduate Scholarship. Microscopy support was provided by the Cell Biology and Image Acquisition core facility, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa.
EMBO Reports (2019) 20: e46885
References
- 1. Parzych KR, Klionsky DJ (2014) An overview of autophagy: morphology, mechanism, and regulation. Antioxid Redox Signal 20: 460–473 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Kim J, Kundu M, Viollet B, Guan KL (2011) AMPK and mTOR regulate autophagy through direct phosphorylation of Ulk1. Nat Cell Biol 13: 132–141 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Yuan HX, Russell RC, Guan KL (2013) Regulation of PIK3C3/VPS34 complexes by MTOR in nutrient stress‐induced autophagy. Autophagy 9: 1983–1995 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Hosokawa N, Hara T, Kaizuka T, Kishi C, Takamura A, Miura Y, Iemura S, Natsume T, Takehana K, Yamada N et al (2009) Nutrient‐dependent mTORC1 association with the ULK1‐Atg13‐FIP200 complex required for autophagy. Mol Biol Cell 20: 1981–1991 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Ganley IG, Lam du H, Wang J, Ding X, Chen S, Jiang X (2009) ULK1.ATG13.FIP200 complex mediates mTOR signaling and is essential for autophagy. J Biol Chem 284: 12297–12305 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Underwood BR, Imarisio S, Fleming A, Rose C, Krishna G, Heard P, Quick M, Korolchuk VI, Renna M, Sarkar S et al (2010) Antioxidants can inhibit basal autophagy and enhance neurodegeneration in models of polyglutamine disease. Hum Mol Genet 19: 3413–3429 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Russell RC, Yuan HX, Guan KL (2014) Autophagy regulation by nutrient signaling. Cell Res 24: 42–57 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Gomes LC, Dikic I (2014) Autophagy in antimicrobial immunity. Mol Cell 54: 224–233 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. McAlpine F, Williamson LE, Tooze SA, Chan EY (2013) Regulation of nutrient‐sensitive autophagy by uncoordinated 51‐like kinases 1 and 2. Autophagy 9: 361–373 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Russell RC, Tian Y, Yuan H, Park HW, Chang YY, Kim J, Kim H, Neufeld TP, Dillin A, Guan KL (2013) ULK1 induces autophagy by phosphorylating Beclin‐1 and activating VPS34 lipid kinase. Nat Cell Biol 15: 741–750 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Park JM, Jung CH, Seo M, Otto NM, Grunwald D, Kim KH, Moriarity B, Kim YM, Starker C, Nho RS et al (2016) The ULK1 complex mediates MTORC1 signaling to the autophagy initiation machinery via binding and phosphorylating ATG14. Autophagy 12: 547–564 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Di Bartolomeo S, Corazzari M, Nazio F, Oliverio S, Lisi G, Antonioli M, Pagliarini V, Matteoni S, Fuoco C, Giunta L et al (2010) The dynamic interaction of AMBRA1 with the dynein motor complex regulates mammalian autophagy. J Cell Biol 191: 155–168 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Fan W, Nassiri A, Zhong Q (2011) Autophagosome targeting and membrane curvature sensing by Barkor/Atg14(L). Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108: 7769–7774 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Fujita N, Itoh T, Omori H, Fukuda M, Noda T, Yoshimori T (2008) The Atg16L complex specifies the site of LC3 lipidation for membrane biogenesis in autophagy. Mol Biol Cell 19: 2092–2100 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Randow F, Youle RJ (2014) Self and nonself: how autophagy targets mitochondria and bacteria. Cell Host Microbe 15: 403–411 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Chauhan S, Mandell MA, Deretic V (2015) IRGM governs the core autophagy machinery to conduct antimicrobial defense. Mol Cell 58: 507–521 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Travassos LH Carneiro LA, Ramjeet M, Hussey S, Kim YG, Magalhães JG, Yuan L, Soares F, Chea E, Le Bourhis L et al (2010) Nod1 and Nod2 direct autophagy by recruiting ATG16L1 to the plasma membrane at the site of bacterial entry. Nat Immunol 11: 55–62 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Parkes M (2012) Evidence from genetics for a role of autophagy and innate immunity in IBD pathogenesis. Dig Dis 30: 330–333 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Massey DC, Parkes M (2007) Genome‐wide association scanning highlights two autophagy genes, ATG16L1 and IRGM, as being significantly associated with Crohn's disease. Autophagy 3: 649–651 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Sadaghian Sadabad M, Regeling A, de Goffau MC, Blokzijl T, Weersma RK, Penders J, Faber KN, Harmsen HJ, Dijkstra G (2015) The ATG16L1‐T300A allele impairs clearance of pathosymbionts in the inflamed ileal mucosa of Crohn's disease patients. Gut 64: 1546–1552 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Murthy A, Li Y, Peng I, Reichelt M, Katakam AK, Noubade R, Roose‐Girma M, DeVoss J, Diehl L, Graham RR et al (2014) A Crohn's disease variant in Atg16l1 enhances its degradation by caspase 3. Nature 506: 456–462 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Sorbara MT, Ellison LK, Ramjeet M, Travassos LH, Jones NL, Girardin SE, Philpott DJ (2013) The protein ATG16L1 suppresses inflammatory cytokines induced by the intracellular sensors Nod1 and Nod2 in an autophagy‐independent manner. Immunity 39: 858–873 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Homer CR, Richmond AL, Rebert NA, Achkar JP, McDonald C (2010) ATG16L1 and NOD2 interact in an autophagy‐dependent antibacterial pathway implicated in Crohn's disease pathogenesis. Gastroenterology 139: 1630–1641 1641.e1–2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Diamanti MA, Gupta J, Bennecke M, De Oliveira T, Ramakrishnan M, Braczynski AK, Richter B, Beli P, Hu Y, Saleh M et al (2017) IKKalpha controls ATG16L1 degradation to prevent ER stress during inflammation. J Exp Med 214: 423–437 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Gao P, Liu H, Huang H, Zhang Q, Strober W, Zhang F (2017) The inflammatory bowel disease‐associated autophagy gene Atg16L1T300A acts as a dominant negative variant in mice. J Immunol 198: 2457–2467 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Boada‐Romero E, Serramito‐Gómez I, Sacristán MP, Boone DL, Xavier RJ, Pimentel‐Muiños FX (2016) The T300A Crohn's disease risk polymorphism impairs function of the WD40 domain of ATG16L1. Nat Commun 7: 11821 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Gammoh N, Florey O, Overholtzer M, Jiang X (2012) Interaction between FIP200 and ATG16L1 distinguishes ULK1 complex‐dependent and ‐independent autophagy. Nat Struct Mol Biol 20: 144–149 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Nishimura T, Kaizuka T, Cadwell K, Sahani MH, Saitoh T, Akira S, Virgin HW, Mizushima N (2013) FIP200 regulates targeting of Atg16L1 to the isolation membrane. EMBO Rep 14: 284–291 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Alonso S, Pethe K, Russell DG, Purdy GE (2007) Lysosomal killing of Mycobacterium mediated by ubiquitin‐derived peptides is enhanced by autophagy. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104: 6031–6036 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Santeford A, Wiley LA, Park S, Bamba S, Nakamura R, Gdoura A, Ferguson TA, Rao PK, Guan JL, Saitoh T et al (2016) Impaired autophagy in macrophages promotes inflammatory eye disease. Autophagy 12: 1876–1885 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Hu Y, Baud V, Delhase M, Zhang P, Deerinck T, Ellisman M, Johnson R, Karin M (1999) Abnormal morphogenesis but intact IKK activation in mice lacking the IKKalpha subunit of IkappaB kinase. Science 284: 316–320 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Cheong H, Lindsten T, Wu J, Lu C, Thompson CB (2011) Ammonia‐induced autophagy is independent of ULK1/ULK2 kinases. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108: 11121–11126 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.