Abstract.
This is the first cross-sectional study of the seroprevalence and risk factors for Coxiella burnetii in Jordan. A total of 781 individuals from 11 governorates of Jordan were tested by SERION ELISA classic C. burnetii IgG Phase 2. A validated and pretested questionnaire was used to collect risk factors and demographic data. The overall seroprevalence for C. burnetii was 24.2% (95% CI; 21.3–27.3%). Unadjusted odds ratios showed that governorate of residence, consumption of raw milk, and ownership of sheep, goats, and dogs were significantly (P ≤ 0.05) associated with C. burnetii seropositivity. The multivariate logistic regression showed that individuals who own small ruminants had three times greater odds of seropositivity than those who do not own a small ruminant, after controlling for age, gender, raw milk consumption, and ownership of dogs. In addition, individuals who live in Al-Karak, Az-Zarqa, and Al-Tafilah had significantly greater odds of seropositivity compared with individuals who live in the capital city, Amman (OR = 3.6, 4.8, and 2.7, respectively). This study suggests that preventive measures should be practiced in ruminant farms in Jordan to avoid C. burnetii infection. Coxiella burnetii should also be considered in the differential diagnosis of febrile-like illnesses in Jordan, especially among farmers and veterinarians.
INTRODUCTION
Coxiella burnetii is an intracellular, gram-negative bacteria, which is very resistant to desiccation, light, and temperature extremes and, thus, can persist in infected animal farms and their surrounding environment for at least 1 year.1 It is commonly transmitted to humans through inhalation of contaminated aerosols or dust from infected ruminants and their excretions, and a single organism can cause infection when inhaled.2 Once aerosolized, C. burnetii can be widespread and has been found far from the place of origin. Ruminants, cats, and dogs have been noted as reservoirs, and many become infected by tick bites.3–5
Coxiella burnetii infection in humans causes the disease Q fever. About 40% of infected individuals develop clinical signs, with 38% exhibiting acute febrile illness and 2% of these cases requiring hospitalization.6,7 The disease has been reported in many countries around the world but epidemiological data are limited to those generated by outbreak investigations, serosurveys in humans or animals, or data from laboratories, and most data are from the United States and Europe. Q fever has been reported in several countries that share a border with Jordan, including Iraq, Saudi Arabia, and Israel.3,8–10 A recent study reported an overall C. burnetii prevalence of 63% among dairy ruminants (cattle, sheep, and goats) in Jordan.11 However, there are no data available on seroprevalence and risk factors among humans in Jordan. Thus, this study aimed to fill this knowledge gap through testing a sample of the general population of Jordan for C. burnetii seropositivity.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
Study population and sample size.
Jordan is located in the Middle East and North Africa region with a GDP of $40.1 billion, a population of 9.7 million, and a life expectancy of 74 years.12 Sample size was calculated using the formula n = z2 p (1 − p)/d2 at 95% CI (z = 1.96) and expected seroprevalence (p) of 50%, with a precision (d) of 0.05. The minimum required sample size was 384 individuals, but 781 individuals were included for higher precision. Healthy individuals accompanying sick relatives who were seeking care at government human health centers were randomly selected to participate in this study. The health centers were selected from a list provided by the Ministry of Health and the number of health centers, and the target number of individuals from each health center were proportionately selected based on population size from each of the 11 governorates of Jordan.
Setting.
This cross-sectional study was conducted from November 2015 to May 2016. All blood samples were collected by registered nurses and medical professionals. At each health center, the sera were harvested from the blood samples by centrifugation at 3,000 rpm for 10 minutes. The sera samples were then placed in Eppendorf tubes and stored at −20°C until shipment to the Food Safety and Zoonotic Diseases Laboratory at Jordan University of Science and Technology (JUST). The samples were transported to the laboratory under cold conditions in ice boxes. Once at the laboratory, aliquots (ca. 200 µL each) were made from each serum sample. An inventory was created for all sera samples, and they were properly labeled with governorate name, health center name, and sample number. The samples were stored in racks in the laboratory freezer at −20°C until analyses. The samples were analyzed within 1 month of storage.
Risk factor data collection.
A validated questionnaire was used to collect demographic and risk factor data about each participant such as food consumption habits and animal ownership. The questionnaire was tested among 40 individuals, and all needed revisions were made to the final questionnaire. The questionnaire was self-administered in Arabic and returned in a questionnaire collection envelope.
Ethical considerations.
This research was approved by the Institutional Research Bioethics Committee of JUST (IRB#7601) and by the Jordanian Ministry of Health. All individuals were briefed about the study objectives, and it was emphasized to all of them that their enrollment is completely voluntary. All data were collected and stored confidentially.
Laboratory testing.
Sera samples were tested for C. burnetii IgG antibodies using SERION ELISA classic C. burnetii IgG Phase 2 (Institut Virion\Serion GmbH, Würzburg, Germany) following the manufacturer’s instructions.
Data management and statistical analyses.
The test results and questionnaire data were entered into Microsoft Excel (Redmond, WA) and analyzed using STATA 14.2 (College Station, TX). Frequency distributions were examined to assess the distribution of the data. Simple descriptive statistics and χ2 statistics were performed where appropriate. Bivariate analyses were conducted to assess associations between seropositivity and each independent variable collected (gender, age, education level, village or city residence, governorate, household income, history of living outside Jordan, consumption of raw meats, consumption of raw milk, and animal ownership [sheep, goats, cattle, camel, dogs, and cats]). Variables associated with the outcome at a P-value of ≤ 0.05 were considered significant. The significant variables found in this study and other significant variables reported in literature (such as age) were included in the final logistic regression model after testing for collinearity, variance inflation factors, and Hosmer–Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test.
RESULTS
Overall, the seroprevalence of C. burnetii Phase 2 IgG was 24.2% (Table 1). Univariate analysis (unadjusted odds ratios [UOR]) showed higher odds of seropositivity among males (UOR = 1.4, P = 0.6 compared with females), and individuals living in the governorates of Az-Zarqa (UOR = 4.0, P < 0.001), Tafela (UOR = 2.5, P = 0.02), and Al-Karak (UOR = 3.7, P < 0.001) compared with those residing in the capital city, Amman. Living in a village and drinking raw milk were also associated with a higher odds of C. burnetii seropositivity (Table 1). There was a significantly greater odds of seropositivity among individuals who own any small ruminants (Table 2). Dog ownership was also associated with greater odds of seropositivity (Table 2).
Table 1.
No. + /No. tested | % Positive | UOR | P-value | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Seropositive | 189/781 | 24.2 | NA | – |
Age (Years) | ||||
< 15 | 5/18 | 27.8 | 1 | NA |
15–29 | 54/251 | 21.5 | 0.71 | 0.54 |
30–49 | 76/293 | 25.9 | 0.91 | 0.864 |
50 + | 54/219 | 24.7 | 0.85 | 0.77 |
Gender | ||||
Female | 95/440 | 21.6 | 1 | NA |
Male | 94/341 | 27.6 | 1.38 | 0.05 |
City or village | ||||
Badia or village | 118/438 | 26.9 | 1 | NA |
City | 71/343 | 20.7 | 0.71 | 0.04 |
Governorate | ||||
Ma’an | 9/69 | 13.0 | 0.63 | 0.34 |
Irbid | 11/70 | 15.7 | 0.79 | 0.60 |
Jerash | 22/87 | 25.3 | 1.43 | 0.36 |
Al-Karak | 34/73 | 46.6 | 3.69 | 0.001 |
Az-Zarqa | 38/76 | 50.0 | 4.23 | < 0.00 |
Al-Tafilah | 28/75 | 37.3 | 2.52 | 0.02 |
Al-Balqa | 9/74 | 12.2 | 0.56 | 0.26 |
Amman | 13/68 | 19.1 | 1 | NA |
Madaba | 13/75 | 17.3 | 0.89 | 0.78 |
Al-Mafraq | 7/57 | 12.3 | 0.59 | 0.30 |
Ajloun | 5/57 | 8.8 | 0.41 | 0.11 |
Education | ||||
No education | 55/203 | 27.1 | 1 | NA |
Any education | 134/578 | 23.2 | 0.81 | 0.26 |
Monthly household income | ||||
Less than 750 USD | 127/522 | 24.3 | 1 | NA |
More than 750 USD | 62/259 | 23.9 | 0.98 | 0.90 |
Living Abroad | ||||
Ever lived abroad | 26/112 | 23.2 | 1 | NA |
Never lived abroad | 163/669 | 24.4 | 1.07 | 0.79 |
Consumption of undercooked meat | ||||
Yes | 17/69 | 24.6 | 1.03 | 0.93 |
No | 172/712 | 24.2 | 1 | NA |
Consumption of raw milk | ||||
Yes | 37/110 | 33.6 | 1.73 | 0.01 |
No | 152/671 | 22.7 | 1 | NA |
UOR = unadjusted odds ratios. Values in bold indicate significant association (P < 0.05) with seropositivity.
Table 2.
Animal ownership | No. + /No. tested | % Positive | UOR | P-value |
Camels | ||||
Yes | 5/11 | 45.5 | 2.65 | 0.11 |
No | 184/770 | 23.9 | 1 | NA |
Goat | ||||
Yes | 72/161 | 44.7 | 3.48 | < 0.0001 |
No | 117/620 | 18.9 | 1 | NA |
Cow | ||||
Yes | 13/48 | 27.1 | 1.18 | 0.63 |
No | 176/733 | 24.0 | 1 | NA |
Sheep | ||||
Yes | 73/156 | 46.8 | 3.86 | < 0.0001 |
No | 116/625 | 18.7 | 1 | NA |
Small ruminants | ||||
Yes | 86/201 | 42.8 | 3.46 | < 0.0001 |
No | 103/580 | 17.8 | 1 | NA |
Cats | ||||
Yes | 9/43 | 20.9 | 0.82 | 0.61 |
No | 180/738 | 24.4 | 1 | NA |
Dogs | ||||
Yes | 32/93 | 34.4 | 1.77 | 0.02 |
No | 157/688 | 22.8 | 1 | NA |
UOR = unadjusted odds ratios. Values in bold indicate significant association (P < 0.05) with seropositivity.
The multivariate logistic regression showed that individuals who own small ruminants had significantly greater odds of seropositivity compared with those who do not own small ruminants (Table 3). In addition, individuals who live in Al-Karak, Az-Zarqa, and Al-Tafilah had significantly greater odds of seropositivity (OR = 3.6, 4.8, and 2.7, respectively) than individuals who live in the capital city, Amman (Table 3).
Table 3.
Variable | Adjusted odds ratio | P-value | 95% CI |
---|---|---|---|
Age: 15–29 years* | 2.17 | 0.208 | 0.65–7.25 |
Age: 30–49 years* | 2.96 | 0.075 | 0.90–9.79 |
Age: 50+ years* | 2.58 | 0.123 | 0.77–8.63 |
Male | 0.91 | 0.653 | 0.62–1.36 |
Owns small ruminant | 3.6 | 0.002 | 1.59–8.14 |
Drinks raw milk | 1.61 | 0.066 | 0.97–2.68 |
Owns a dog | 0.90 | 0.750 | 0.49–1.68 |
Ma’an governorate† | 0.67 | 0.411 | 0.26–1.74 |
Irbid governorate† | 0.96 | 0.934 | 0.39–2.40 |
Jerash governorate† | 0.99 | 0.980 | 0.41–2.36 |
Al-Karak governorate† | 3.60 | 0.002 | 1.59–8.14 |
Az-Zarqa governorate | 4.77 | ˂0.001 | 2.13–10.69 |
Al-Tafila governorate† | 2.69 | 0.017 | 1.19–6.07 |
Al-Balqa governorate† | 0.77 | 0.597 | 0.30–2.01 |
Madaba governorate† | 0.87 | 0.759 | 0.35–2.15 |
Al-Mafraq governorate† | 0.59 | 0.313 | 0.21–1.66 |
Ajloun governorate† | 0.54 | 0.289 | 0.18–1.68 |
Values in bold indicate significant association (P < 0.05) with seropositivity.
* Compared with reference age group < 15 years old.
† Compared with the capital city, Amman.
DISCUSSION
This study was the first to report evidence of C. burnetii infection of humans in Jordan and found an overall seroprevalence of 24.2%, which is higher than the seroprevalence reported in other countries despite the lower sensitivity of the ELISA method used in our study compared with commonly used immunofluorescence assay.13 Lower seroprevalence was reported in Thailand (12.4%),14 Northern Ireland (12.8%),15 and Barcelona, Spain (15.3%),16 whereas higher seroprevalence was reported in Cyprus (52.7%).17 Our study also shows that the seroprevalence in small ruminant farmers is 42.8%. In The Netherlands, high seroprevalence was found in dairy sheep (66.7%)18 and goat (73.5%) farmers.19
The dairy cow owners in Jordan are either commercial or subsistence owners, whereas small ruminant owners are primarily subsistence ones with a very short sale chain, primarily to nearby dairy shops. In this study, small ruminant ownership is significantly associated with C. burnetii seropositivity. Previous studies in The Netherlands showed that living on a farm increases the odds of seropositivity among veterinary students,20 and farmers with frequent work or exposure to goats also had a high risk of seropositivity.18,19 In a study in the United States, farmers who had contact with goats and goat newborns had increased risk of infection during an outbreak associated with abortion storm in a goat farm.21 The latter study showed that farm visitors also contracted the disease.21 An outbreak in Germany among residents living in close proximity to a sheep farm was linked to infected sheep birthing.22,23 Proximity to farm animals and contact with infected animals was also considered as the most important risk factor for infection in other studies from Europe (Germany, France, The Netherlands, and Bulgaria).24 Another study showed that working with ruminants as laboratory animals doubled the risk for C. burnetii seropositivity.25 The high risk of infection/seropositivity among animal owners is consistent with inhalation being the major transmission route of C. burnetii and the ability of the pathogen to travel long distances in air.26 It has been shown that automatic milking of ruminants and compliance with wearing gloves during and around calving protects farmers against C. burnetii infection.27 Therefore, biosecurity and protective measures are recommended for farmers and veterinarian, especially around calving/lambing seasons. In addition, respiratory protection is recommended during abortion storms in ruminants to protect against C. burnetii infection.26
There is a significant difference in the seroprevalence among governorates in Jordan. Individuals who live in Al-Karak, Az-Zarqa, and Al-Tafilah have greater odds of seropositivity compared with individuals who live in the capital city, Amman. Significant differences among regions within the same country have also been reported in Thailand.14 In addition, two locations were identified with high seroprevalence compared with other locations in Cyprus using geographical information system.17 Differences among governorates might be explained by differences in rainfall, soil types, moisture, and vegetation density. A recent study showed that vegetation density is negatively associated with Q fever incidence in The Netherlands.28 Higher soil moisture and open land use is negatively associated with the incidence of Q fever.28 The large animal populations in Al-Karak, Az-Zarqa, and Al-Tafilah coupled with the low annual rainfall might increase the aerosolization of and infection by C. burnetii.
The univariate analysis shows that consumption of raw unpasteurized milk is significantly associated with higher C. burnetii seropositivity. However, this association is not significant in the multivariate analysis. A recent risk assessment study in the United Kingdom showed that the risk of drinking raw milk and eating unpasteurized cheese for C. burnetii infection exists, but lower than the risk of transmission by aerosol inhalation from parturient products and livestock contact.29 Moreover, ingestion of C. burnetii in raw milk might lead only to seroconversion, not necessarily to clinical disease, and seroconversion might occur from ingesting inactivated C. burnetii cells as well as live ones.30
In the present study, males have significantly higher seroprevalence compared with females in the univariate analysis, but not in the multivariate one. No significant difference by gender was observed in Thailand,14 Spain,16 and The Netherlands.19 However, some reported higher anti-C. burnetii antibodies in males compared with females and this may be due to males having more contact with livestock in some settings.31–33
CONCLUSION
This is the first study to document C. burnetii in humans in Jordan and it found that seroprevalence is high. Given that endocarditis has been reported as a chronic complication of Q-fever in several countries such as United States,34 Canada,35 and France,36 it is likely that is also the case in Jordan. Considering Q fever infection in the differential diagnosis of endocarditis could be helpful as this condition can be improved with antibiotic treatment.37 Q fever should also be considered in the differential diagnosis in febrile-like illnesses in Jordan, especially among farmers, veterinarians, and others with a history of close contact with small ruminants. Future studies of acute or chronic cases of Q fever in Jordan are recommended.
Acknowledgments:
We acknowledge and thank the participants and all nurses and health professionals who assisted in sample collection.
REFERENCES
- 1.Kersh GJ, et al. 2013. Presence and persistence of Coxiella burnetii in the environments of goat farms associated with a Q fever outbreak. Appl Environ Microbiol 79: 1697–1703. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Brooke RJ, Kretzschmar ME, Mutters NT, Teunis PF, 2013. Human dose response relation for airborne exposure to Coxiella burnetii. BMC Infect Dis 13: 488. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Amitai Z, et al. 2010. A large Q fever outbreak in an urban school in central Israel. Clin Infect Dis 50: 1433–1438. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.D’Amato F, Million M, Edouard S, Delerce J, Robert C, Marrie T, Raoult D, 2014. Draft genome sequence of Coxiella burnetii Dog Utad, a strain isolated from a dog-related outbreak of Q fever. New Microbes New Infect 2: 136–137. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Komiya T, Sadamasu K, Toriniwa H, Kato K, Arashima Y, Fukushi H, Hirai K, Arakawa Y, 2003. Epidemiological survey on the route of Coxiella burnetii infection in an animal hospital. J Infect Chemother 9: 151–155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Maurin M, Raoult D, 1999. Q fever. Clin Microbiol Rev 12: 518–553. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Raoult D, Marrie T, Mege J, 2005. Natural history and pathophysiology of Q fever. Lancet Infect Dis 5: 219–226. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Almogren A, Shakoor Z, Hasanato R, Adam MH, 2013. Q fever: a neglected zoonosis in Saudi Arabia. Ann Saudi Med 33: 464–468. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Ergas D, Abdul-Hai A, Sthoeger ZM, 2008. Acalculous cholecystitis: an unusual presentation of acute Q fever masquerading as infectious endocarditis. Am J Med Sci 336: 356–357. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Vest KG, Clark LL, 2014. Serosurvey and observational study of US army veterinary corps officers for Q fever antibodies from 1989 to 2008. Zoonoses Public Health 61: 271–282. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Obaidat MM, Kersh GJ, 2017. Prevalence and risk factors of Coxiella burnetii antibodies in bulk milk from cattle, sheep, and goats in Jordan. J Food Prot 80: 561–566. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.World Bank , 2017. Jordan data. World Bank; Available at: https://data.worldbank.org/country/jordan. Accessed January 8, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Wegdam-Blans MC, Wielders CC, Meekelenkamp J, Korbeeck JM, Herremans T, Tjhie HT, Bijlmer HA, Koopmans MP, Schneeberger PM, 2012. Evaluation of commonly used serological tests for detection of Coxiella burnetii antibodies in well-defined acute and follow-up sera. Clin Vaccine Immunol 19:1110–1115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Doung-Ngern P, Chuxnum T, Pangjai D, Opaschaitat P, Kittiwan N, Rodtian P, Buameetoop N, Kersh GJ, Padungtod P, 2017. Seroprevalence of Coxiella burnetii antibodies among ruminants and occupationally exposed people in Thailand, 2012–2013. Am J Trop Med Hyg 96: 786–790. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.McCaughey C, Murray LJ, McKenna JP, Menzies FD, McCullough SJ, O’Neill HJ, Wyatt DE, Cardwell CR, Coyle PV, 2010. Coxiella burnetii (Q fever) seroprevalence in cattle. Epidemiol Infect 138: 21–27. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Cardeñosa N, Sanfeliu I, Font B, Muñoz T, Nogueras MM, Segura F, 2006. Seroprevalence of human infection by Coxiella burnetii in Barcelona (northeast of Spain). Am J Trop Med Hyg 75: 33–35. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Psaroulaki A, Hadjichristodoulou C, Loukaides F, Soteriades E, Konstantinidis A, Papastergiou P, Ioannidou MC, Tselentis Y, 2006. Epidemiological study of Q fever in humans, ruminant animals, and ticks in Cyprus using a geographical information system. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 25: 576–586. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.De Lange MM, Schimmer B, Vellema P, Hautvast JL, Schneeberger PM, Van Duijnhoven YT, 2014. Coxiella burnetii seroprevalence and risk factors in sheep farmers and farm residents in The Netherlands. Epidemiol Infect 142: 1231–1244. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Schimmer B, Lenferink A, Schneeberger P, Aangenend H, Vellema P, Hautvast J, van Duynhoven Y, 2012. Seroprevalence and risk factors for Coxiella burnetii (Q fever) seropositivity in dairy goat farmers’ households in The Netherlands, 2009–2010. PLoS One 7: e42364. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.de Rooij MM, Schimmer B, Versteeg B, Schneeberger P, Berends BR, Heederik D, van der Hoek W, Wouters IM, 2012. Risk factors of Coxiella burnetii (Q fever) seropositivity in veterinary medicine students. PLoS One 7: e32108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Bjork A, et al. 2014. First reported multistate human Q fever outbreak in the United States, 2011. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis 14: 111–117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Boden K, Brasche S, Straube E, Bischof W, 2014. Specific risk factors for contracting Q fever: lessons from the outbreak Jena. Int J Hyg Environ Health 217: 110–115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Gilsdorf A, Kroh C, Grimm S, Jensen E, Wagner-Wiening C, Alpers K, 2008. Large Q fever outbreak due to sheep farming near residential areas, Germany, 2005. Epidemiol Infect 136: 1084–1087. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Georgiev M, et al. 2013. Q fever in humans and farm animals in four European countries, 1982 to 2010. Euro Surveill 18: 20407. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Whitney EA, Massung RF, Kersh GJ, Fitzpatrick KA, Mook DM, Taylor DK, Huerkamp MJ, Vakili JC, Sullivan PJ, Berkelman RL, 2013. Survey of laboratory animal technicians in the United States for Coxiella burnetii antibodies and exploration of risk factors for exposure. J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci 52: 725–731. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.National Association of State Public Health Veterinarians , 2015. Compendium of veterinary standard precautions for zoonotic disease prevention in veterinary personnel. J Am Vet Med Assoc 247: 1252–1278. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Schimmer B, Schotten N, van Engelen E, Hautvast JL, Schneeberger PM, van Duijnhoven YT, 2014. Coxiella burnetii seroprevalence and risk for humans on dairy cattle farms, The Netherlands, 2010–2011. Emerg Infect Dis 20: 417–425. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Van Leuken JPG, Swart AN, Brandsma J, Terink W, Van de Kassteele J, Droogers P, Sauter F, Havelaar AH, Van der Hoek W, 2016. Human Q fever incidence is associated to spatiotemporal environmental conditions. One Health 2: 77–87. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Gale P, Kelly L, Mearns R, Duggan J, Snary EL, 2015. Q fever through consumption of unpasteurised milk and milk products—a risk profile and exposure assessment. J Appl Microbiol 118: 1083–1095. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Cerf O, Condron R, 2006. Coxiella burnetii and milk pasteurization: an early application of the precautionary principle? Epidemiol Infect 134: 946–951. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Chang CC, et al. 2010. Identification of risk factors of Coxiella burnetii (Q fever) infection in veterinary-associated populations in southern Taiwan. Zoonoses Public Health 57: e95–e101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.McCaughey C, McKenna J, McKenna C, Coyle PV, O’Neill HJ, Wyatt DE, Smyth B, Murray LJ, 2008. Human seroprevalence to Coxiella burnetii (Q fever) in Northern Ireland. Zoonoses Public Health 55: 189–194. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Whitney EA, Massung RF, Candee AJ, Ailes EC, Myers LM, Patterson NE, Berkelman RL, 2009. Seroepidemiologic and occupational risk survey for Coxiella burnetii antibodies among US veterinarians. Clin Infect Dis 48: 550–557. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Straily A, Dahlgren FS, Peterson A, Paddock CD, 2017. Surveillance for Q fever endocarditis in the United States, 1999–2015. Clin Infect Dis 65: 1872–1877. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Deyell MW, Chiu B, Ross DB, Alvarez N, 2006. Q fever endocarditis: a case report and review of the literature. Can J Cardiol 22: 781–785. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Martin-Aspas A, Collado-Perez C, Vela-Manzano L, Fernandez-Gutierrez Del Alamo C, Tinoco-Racero I, Giron-Gonzalez JA, 2015. Acute Q fever and the risk of developing endocarditis. Rev Clin Esp 215: 265–271. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Kersh GJ, 2013. Antimicrobial therapies for Q fever. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther 11: 1207–1214. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]