Abstract
Gastric cancer (GC) is a severe public health problem worldwide, particularly in China. Radiotherapy is the main locoregional treatment for various types of unresectable tumor, including GC. However, many patients fail to respond to radiotherapy due to the intrinsic radioresistance of cancer cells. This study was designed to investigate the effects and potential mechanism of radiosensitization associated with DNA-dependent protein kinase catalytic subunit (DNA-PKcs) inhibitor in human GC cell lines in vitro. Among the six GC cell lines (SGC7901, HGC-27, MKN45, MKN74, BGC823 and MGC803) that were exposed to increasing doses of IR (0, 2, 4, 6 and 8 Gy), the mean lethal dose and quasi-threshold dose measurements indicated that BGC823 and MGC803 were relatively insensitive to ionizing radiation (IR). IR induced significant elevation of γ H2A histone family member X (γH2AX) in MKN45 cells compared with BGC823 cells. DNA-PKcs and phospho-DNA-PKcs protein levels were increased in BGC823 and MGC803 cells compared with other GC cell lines (SGC7901, HGC-27, MKN45 and MKN74). DNA-PKcs inhibition led to increased sensitivity of BGC823 and MGC803 cells to IR. NU7441 increased γH2AX expression in the nuclei of BGC823 cells following IR. Combination of DNA-PKcs and CK2 inhibition further increased the sensitivity of GC cells to IR. The combination of NU7441 and CX4945 increased γH2AX expression in the nucleus of BGC823 cells following IR compared with treatment with NU7441 alone. Taken together, the findings suggest that DNA-PKcs inhibitor increased the sensitivity of radioresistant BGC823 and MGC803 cells to radiotherapy through the cleaved-caspase3/γH2AX signaling pathway, thus presenting a potential treatment method for GC.
Keywords: radiotherapy resistance, gastric cancer, DNA-dependent protein kinase catalytic subunit inhibitor
Introduction
Gastric cancer (GC) is the fourth most common type of cancer globally, with high frequency and mortality rates (1). GC remains one of the most severe public health problems worldwide, and particularly in China (2). Therefore, it is necessary to explore potential novel therapeutic methods for treating GC.
Classical adjuvant treatment methods for patients with GC are based on MacDonald's protocol, combining 5-fluoruracil (5-FU) and radiation in patients with stage IB-IVA, which is associated with increased progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of patients with GC (3,4).
Radiotherapy is the major loco-regional control method for unresectable GC. Unfortunately, intrinsic radio-resistance of cells results in failure of radiotherapy in numerous patients (5). The guidelines of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network recommend radiotherapy as a standard therapy for patients with GC. There are two major limitations associated with treating GC via radiation: Intrinsic or acquired resistance to radiotherapy, and nonspecific toxicity to gastric mucosa and the surrounding normal tissues (6,7). For instance, radiotherapy is routinely used for treating cancer and generates various DNA lesions, which in turn activates the DNA damage response (8).
DNA double strand breaks (DSBs) are generated by ionizing radiation (IR), and can be repaired by non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ) and homologous recombination (9,10). DNA-dependent protein kinase catalytic subunit (DNA-PKcs) is a crucial factor involved in NHEJ, and the DNA-PK complex contributes to early-stage damage-induced DNA repair (11). DNA-PKcs expression predicts response to radiotherapy in patients with prostate cancer (12). Silencing of DNA-PKcs leads to increased radiosensitivity and DSBs (13,14). Overexpression of DNA-PKcs in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma has been reported to be associated with a relatively poor clinical outcome (15). Silence and loss-of-function mutations of DNA-PKcs were demonstrated to promote apoptosis resistance in a number of types of cancer cells, including head and neck cancer, leukemia and skin cells (16–18).
Thus, DNA-PK may be a radiotherapeutic target for cancer. In the current study, the function of a DNA-PKcs inhibitor in GC cell lines, and the corresponding molecular mechanisms were investigated, aiming to identify a potential novel treatment method for GC.
Materials and methods
Cell culture
Human BGC823, SGC7901, MGC803, HGC-27, MKN45 and MKN74 GC cell lines were obtained from Shanghai Institute of Cell Biology (Shanghai, China) and cultured in RPMI-1640 medium, supplemented with 10% calf bovine serum, 50 U/ml penicillin and 50 U/ml streptomycin in an incubator at 37°C in 5% CO2.
Ionizing radiation
The DNA-PK inhibitor NU7441 (Tocris Bioscience, Bristol, UK) was dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) as a 5 mmol/l stock solution and stored at −20°C. A casein kinase 2 (CK2) inhibitor, CX4945, was purchased from Selleck Chemicals (Houston, TX, USA). Cells were exposed to X-rays generated by a Rad Source RS2000 irradiator (Rad Source Technologies, Inc., Buford, GA, USA) operating at 25 mA with a 0.3 mm Al filter and effective photon energy of 160 kV. The dose rate at an irradiation distance of 48.6 cm was 1.31 Gy/min.
Clonogenic survival assay
Cells were seeded into 6-well plates (2×106) and treated with or without drug (0.1 µM NU7441 or 0.5 µM CX4945) following attachment for 4–6 h. The next day, the cells were exposed to different doses of IR. Cells were incubated for 10–14 days to form colonies, then fixed with 100% methyl alcohol for 5 min and stained with 1% crystal violet for 10 min at room temperature. Colonies containing >50 cells were counted. Survival fractions were normalized according to the non-irradiated subgroup to eliminate cytotoxicity generated by drug pretreatment. Cell survival curves were obtained using GraphPad Prism 7 software (GraphPad Software, Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA) according to the multitarget single hit model. The radiation-associated parameters, mean lethal dose (D0) and quasi-threshold dose (Dq), were calculated to evaluate the effect of drug pretreatment on the radiosensitivity of GC cells.
Determination of half maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50)
Determination of the IC50 of NU7441 treatment of GC cells was performed using Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8; Dojindo Molecular Technologies, Inc., Kumamoto, Japan). Briefly, following treatment with increasing concentrations of NU7441 (5, 10, 15 and 20 µM) for 48 h, 10 µl CCK-8 solution was added to each well and incubated for 2 h. Subsequently, the cells were transferred into another 96-well plate and the absorbance was detected at 450 nm using a microplate reader (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.) to reflect cell viability. The IC50 was calculated using CompuSyn software version 1.0 (ComboSyn, Inc., Paramus, NJ, USA).
Western blot analysis
Cell extracts were prepared in radioimmunoprecipitation assay lysis buffer (Sigma-Aldrich; Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany) and the concentration was measured using a Pierce BCA Protein Assay kit (Sigma-Aldrich; Merck KGaA) according to the manufacturer's protocol. Briefly, each sample (20 µg protein), prepared with loading buffer, was separated by SDS-PAGE on 8% gels and electrotransferred onto polyvinylidene difluoride membranes (EMD Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA). Membranes were blocked in 5% non-fat milk for 1 h at room temperature and incubated with primary antibody at 4°C overnight. GAPDH primary antibody (cat. no. G8795; 1:5,000) was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Sigma-Aldrich; Merck KGaA), γ H2A histone family member X (γH2AX; cat. no. 33686; 1:1,000), poly [ADP-ribose] polymerase 1 (PARP1; cat. no. 31288; 1:1,000) and caspase3 (cat. no. 29034; 1:1,000) primary antibodies were from Signalway Antibody LLC (College Park, MD, USA). The membranes were then washed with three times with Tris-buffered saline and incubated with a horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody (cat. no. 7074, 1:10,000; Cell Signaling Technology, Inc., Danvers, MA, USA) for 2 h. Finally, the blots were visualized using enhanced chemiluminescence (EMD Millipore) and the semi-quantification of bands was performed using ImageJ (version 1.51; National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA).
Immunostaining analysis
Cells were incubated with 3% H2O2 for 10 min, permeabilized with 0.3% Triton X-100 in PBS for 15 min and blocked with 10% goat serum for 1 h at room temperature. The sections were then incubated with primary antibody (γH2AX; cat. no. 33686; 1:100) at 4°C overnight. The next day, sections were washed, incubated with biotinylated goat anti-rabbit IgG (cat. no. BA-1000; 1:10,000; Vector Laboratories, Inc., Burlingame, CA, USA) in PBS for 1 h at room temperature and with VECTASTAIN (PK-6200; Vector Laboratories, Inc.) for 1 h. A horseradish peroxidase reaction product was visualized using an enhanced DAB peroxidase substrate kit (cat. no. SK-4100; Vector Laboratories, Inc.). Immunostaining signals were analyzed using the optical fractionator method with Microbrightfield Stereo-Investigator (MBF Bioscience, Williston, VT, USA). The total number of cells in four or five fields of view was counted per sample.
Statistical analysis
Data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation. Comparisons between two groups were evaluated by the Student's t-test, and comparisons among multiple groups were analyzed by analysis of variance followed by Newman-Keuls post-hoc analysis using GraphPad Prism 7 software (GraphPad Software, Inc.). P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.
Results
BGC823 and MGC803 cell lines are relatively resistant to IR
In the present study, six human GC cell lines, SGC7901, HGC-27, MKN45, MKN74, BGC823 and MGC803, were used, and the relative sensitivities to IR were determined by clonogenic survival assay. BGC823 and MGC803 cells were the most resistant to IR, with higher D0 and Dq values (Fig. 1A and Table I). In addition, the expression levels of key regulators involved in cell apoptosis and cell survival were detected in all cell lines treated with IR. The expression levels of cleaved caspase3 and γH2AX were relatively low in BGC823 and MGC803 cells compared with other cell lines following IR. PARP1, the substrate of active caspase3, was expressed at a relatively high level in BGC823 and MGC803 cells (Fig. 1B and C).
Table I.
Parameter | SGC7901 | HGC-27 | MKN-45 | MKN-28 | BGC-823 | MGC-803 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
lnN | 0.689641 | 0.822859 | 0.266203 | 0.524137 | 0.431782 | 0.66114 |
D0 | 2.795639 | 2.497502 | 3.273322 | 3.303601 | 4.539265 | 3.863988 |
Dq | 1.927987 | 2.055092 | 0.871368 | 1.731538 | 1.959975 | 2.554638 |
lnN, ln extrapolation number; D0, mean lethal dose; Dq, quasi-threshold dose.
To further evaluate their response to IR, immunofluorescence was used to observe γH2AX expression following IR treatment. BGC823 cells exhibited weak fluorescence signals compared with MKN45 cells, indicating a mild double strand break induced by IR (Fig. 2A and B).
Overexpression of DNA-PKcs and its phosphorylated form in BGC823 and MGC803 cells
The expression of DNA-PKcs, whose expression predicts response to radiotherapy in various types of cancers, is responsible for DNA repair (12,19). Western blotting detection of DNA-PKcs and p-DNA-PKcs proteins indicated that DNA-PKcs was expressed more highly in BGC823 and MGC803 cells compared with other GC cell lines (Fig. 3A and B).
Inhibition of DNA-PKcs sensitizes BGC823 and MGC803 cells towards IR
To determine whether DNA-PKcs were responsible for different sensitivities towards IR, NU7441 (a DNA-PKcs inhibitor) was used to inhibit DNA-PKcs activity. Cell viability assays revealed that the IC50 was 3.724 µM and 4.704 µM for BGC823 and MGC803, respectively (Fig. 4A). At a very low concentration without significant growth inhibitory effect, 0.1 µM NU7441 induced a decreased survival fraction in response to IR compared with cells treated with DMSO in both BGC823 and MGC803 cells (Fig. 4B and C; Table II). In addition, NU7441 treatment increased γH2AX and cleaved-caspase3 protein expression levels in BGC823 and MGC803 cells treated with IR (Fig. 4D and E); 0.1 µM NU7441 significantly elevated IR induced cell apoptosis of BGC823 and MGC803 cells (Fig. 4F and G). Furthermore, immunofluorescence analysis confirmed an elevation of γH2AX expression in the nucleus in cells treated with NU7441 after IR in BGC823 (Fig. 5A and B). These data collectively demonstrated that DNA-PKcs was involved in radiotherapy sensitivity in GC.
Table II.
BGC823 | MGC803 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Parameter | DMSO | NU7441 | DMSO | NU7441 |
lnN | 0.480573 | 0.421338 | 0.677018 | 0.285931 |
D0 | 4.526935 | 3.402518 | 3.762227 | 3.30142 |
Dq | 2.175521 | 1.433612 | 2.547095 | 0.943977 |
lnN, ln extrapolation number; D0, mean lethal dose; Dq, quasi-threshold dose.
Combination of CK2 inhibitor and DNA-PKcs inhibitor strongly enhances response to radiotherapy in GC cell lines
A previous study indicated that CK2 inhibition could increase radiotherapy sensitivity via inhibition of X-ray repair cross complementing 1 (XRCC1) (20). In BGC823 and MGC803 cells, the combination of CK2 inhibitor (CX-4945) and DNA-PKcs inhibitor (NU7441), demonstrated a stronger enhancing effect in radiotherapy sensitivity compared with NU7441 alone (Fig. 6A and B; Table III). Furthermore, the combination of CX-4945 and NU7441 further increased γH2AX and cleaved-caspase3 protein expression levels in both cell lines (Fig. 6C and D); additionally, CX4945 further significantly elevated NU7441 induced cell apoptosis of GC823 cells and MGC803 cells (Fig. 6E and F). The elevation of γH2AX expression was validated in an immunofluorescence assay (Fig. 7A and B).
Table III.
BGC823 | MGC803 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Parameter | NU7441 | NU7441 + CX4945 | NU7441 | NU7441 + CX4945 |
lnN | 0.42853 | 0.295650242 | 0.285931 | 0.104360015 |
D0 | 3.434066 | 2.849814762 | 3.30142 | 2.748763057 |
Dq | 1.471602 | 0.842548424 | 0.943977 | 0.286860955 |
lnN, ln extrapolation number; D0, mean lethal dose; Dq, quasi-threshold dose.
Discussion
Radiotherapy is one of the standard treatment approaches for GC, and can significantly improve the 5 year survival rate of patients with GC (21). It is important to maximize the therapeutic effect of radiotherapy towards tumor tissues and minimize damage to normal tissues (22). Thus, increasing sensitivity of GC towards radiotherapy may reduce the side effects of radiation. In the current study, inhibition of DNA-PKcs enhanced radiotherapy sensitivity of GC cells. Combination of DNA-PKcs and CK2 inhibition could further augment sensitivity towards radiotherapy.
Activation of DNA-PKcs has been demonstrated to be crucial for DNA double strand break repair (23). As DNA-PKcs is indispensable for DNA damage repair, its expression is an important indicator for response to DNA-damaging agents in various types of cancer (12,24). DNA-PKcs also promotes cancer cell metastasis via transcriptional regulation (25). In GC, the role of DNA-PKcs is controversial. A report demonstrated that the expression of DNA-PKcs was frequently elevated compared with normal gastric tissues and was associated with relatively lower differentiation (26). In another study, loss of DNA-PKcs in GC was associated with advanced cancer, lymphatic invasion, lymph node metastasis and advanced pTNM stage (27). The activity of DNA-PKcs is largely reliant on Ku70/80 and DNA (28). Mechanistically, Ku-DNA complex induces conformation change of phosphoinositide 3-kinase domain to activate DNA-PKcs (29). In human tumor cells, a study revealed that DNA-PKcs activation was also controlled by the Akt serine/threonine kinase pathway. Activated Akt directly interacts with DNA-PKcs to promote DSB accumulation of DNA-PKcs, which would lead to radiotherapy resistance (30). A recent report discovered that microRNA-101 negatively regulates DNA-PKcs and downregulation of microRNA-101 was responsible for overexpression of DNA-PKcs in renal cell carcinoma (31). The function of DNA-PKcs in mediating radiotherapy sensitivity of GC remains unknown. Expression of DNA-PKcs and its active form were increased in GC cell lines that were relatively insensitive towards IR. In addition, inhibition of DNA-PKcs sensitized GC cells exposed to IR, alongside significantly increased expression of γH2AX and cleaved caspase3.
CK2 is a highly conserved kinase that controls the DNA damage repair regulation process through phosphorylation of its substrates (32). Several reports have indicated that CK2 enhances radiosensitivity of non-small cell lung cancer cells via regulation of XRCC4 (33,34). However, although it modulated DNA damage response, CK2 inhibition failed to increase radiosensitivity of malignant glioma cells (35). In GC, CK2 expression promoted cancer progression and chemoresistance, and predicted poor prognosis (36,37). Inhibition of CK2 activity further increased radiosensitivity of GC cells treated with DNA-PKcs inhibitor. This indicated that CK2 and DNA-PKcs are both involved in the radiosensitivity of GC cells. A double inhibition strategy using CK2 and DNA-PKcs may be effective in improving the effect of radiotherapy in patients with GC.
In conclusion, the findings of the study revealed that DNA-PKcs expression is important for the sensitivity of GC to radiotherapy. Combination of CK2 and DNA-PKcs inhibition further sensitized GC cells to IR. These results suggest that DNA-PKcs and CK2 may be novel therapeutic targets for enhancing the effect of radiotherapy for patients with GC.
Acknowledgements
Not applicable.
Funding
The current study was funded by the Nanjing Military Area Medical Science and Technology Innovation Key Project Funding Project (grant no. 15ZD011) and the Science and Technology Project of Huaian (grant no. HAB201822).
Availability of data and materials
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Authors' contributions
WG, HS, DT, QW and SS performed the experiments and acquired the data. HS, JZ and WX analyzed the data. HS and WG wrote the paper. WG and HS supervised the current study. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Patient consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
References
- 1.Torre LA, Bray F, Siegel RL, Ferlay J, Lortet-Tieulent J, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin. 2015;65:87–108. doi: 10.3322/caac.21262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Yeh JM, Kuntz KM, Ezzati M, Hur C, Kong CY, Goldie SJ. Development of an empirically calibrated model of gastric cancer in two high-risk countries. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2008;17:1179–1187. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-07-2539. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Macdonald JS, Smalley SR, Benedetti J, Hundahl SA, Estes NC, Stemmermann GN, Haller DG, Ajani JA, Gunderson LL, Jessup JM, Martenson JA. Chemoradiotherapy after surgery compared with surgery alone for adenocarcinoma of the stomach or gastroesophageal junction. N Engl J Med. 2001;345:725–730. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa010187. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Toiyama Y, Tanaka K, Konishi N, Mohri Y, Tonouchi H, Miki C, Kusunoki M. Administration sequence-dependent antitumor effects of paclitaxel and 5-fluorouracil in the human gastric cancer cell line MKN45. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2006;57:368–375. doi: 10.1007/s00280-005-0057-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Hartgrink HH, Jansen EP, van Grieken NC, van de Velde CJ. Gastric cancer. Lancet. 2009;374:477–490. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61948-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Valentini V, Cellini F. Radiotherapy in gastric cancer: A systematic review of literature and new perspectives. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2007;7:1379–1393. doi: 10.1586/14737140.7.10.1379. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Garg AK, Buchholz TA, Aggarwal BB. Chemosensitization and radiosensitization of tumors by plant polyphenols. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2005;7:1630–1647. doi: 10.1089/ars.2005.7.1630. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Dai Y, Grant S. New insights into checkpoint kinase 1 in the DNA damage response signaling network. Clin Cancer Res. 2010;16:376–383. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-09-1029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Liu P, Gan W, Guo C, Xie A, Gao D, Guo J, Zhang J, Willis N, Su A, Asara JM, et al. Akt-mediated phosphorylation of XLF impairs non-homologous end-joining DNA repair. Mol Cell. 2015;57:648–661. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2015.01.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Zhang S, Matsunaga S, Lin YF, Sishc B, Shang Z, Sui J, Shih HY, Zhao Y, Foreman O, Story M, et al. Spontaneous tumor development in bone marrow-rescued DNA-PKcs(3A/3A) mice due to dysfunction of telomere leading strand deprotection. Oncogene. 2016;35:3909–3918. doi: 10.1038/onc.2015.459. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Lee SH, Kim CH. DNA-dependent protein kinase complex: A multifunctional protein in DNA repair and damage checkpoint. Mol Cells. 2002;13:159–166. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Bouchaert P, Guerif S, Debiais C, Irani J, Fromont G. DNA-PKcs expression predicts response to radiotherapy in prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012;84:1179–1185. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2012.02.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Peng Y, Zhang Q, Nagasawa H, Okayasu R, Liber HL, Bedford JS. Silencing expression of the catalytic subunit of DNA-dependent protein kinase by small interfering RNA sensitizes human cells for radiation-induced chromosome damage, cell killing, and mutation. Cancer Res. 2002;62:6400–6404. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Toulany M, Kehlbach R, Florczak U, Sak A, Wang S, Chen J, Lobrich M, Rodemann HP. Targeting of AKT1 enhances radiation toxicity of human tumor cells by inhibiting DNA-PKcs-dependent DNA double-strand break repair. Mol Cancer Ther. 2008;7:1772–1781. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-07-2200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Lee SW, Cho KJ, Park JH, Kim SY, Nam SY, Lee BJ, Kim SB, Choi SH, Kim JH, Ahn SD, et al. Expressions of Ku70 and DNA-PKcs as prognostic indicators of local control in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005;62:1451–1457. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.12.049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Bjork-Eriksson T, West C, Nilsson A, Magnusson B, Svensson M, Karlsson E, Slevin N, Lewensohn R, Mercke C. The immunohistochemical expression of DNA-PKCS and Ku (p70/p80) in head and neck cancers: Relationships with radiosensitivity. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1999;45:1005–1010. doi: 10.1016/S0360-3016(99)00268-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Eriksson A, Lewensoh R, Larsson R, Nilsson A. DNA-dependent protein kinase in leukaemia cells and correlation with drug sensitivity. Anticancer Res. 2002;22:1787–1793. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Tu Y, Ji C, Yang B, Yang Z, Gu H, Lu CC, Wang R, Su ZL, Chen B, Sun WL, et al. DNA-dependent protein kinase catalytic subunit (DNA-PKcs)-SIN1 association mediates ultraviolet B (UVB)-induced Akt Ser-473 phosphorylation and skin cell survival. Mol Cancer. 2013;12:172. doi: 10.1186/1476-4598-12-172. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Xu JY, Lu S, Xu XY, Hu SL, Li B, Qi RX, Chen L, Chang JY. Knocking down nucleolin expression enhances the radiosensitivity of non-small cell lung cancer by influencing DNA-PKcs activity. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2015;16:3301–3306. doi: 10.7314/APJCP.2015.16.8.3301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Strom CE, Mortusewicz O, Finch D, Parsons JL, Lagerqvist A, Johansson F, Schultz N, Erixon K, Dianov GL, Helleday T. CK2 phosphorylation of XRCC1 facilitates dissociation from DNA and single-strand break formation during base excision repair. DNA Repair (Amst) 2011;10:961–969. doi: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2011.07.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Zhang ZX, Gu XZ, Yin WB, Huang GJ, Zhang DW, Zhang RG. Randomized clinical trial on the combination of preoperative irradiation and surgery in the treatment of adenocarcinoma of gastric cardia (AGC)-report on 370 patients. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phy. 1998;42:929–934. doi: 10.1016/S0360-3016(98)00280-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Moran JM, Elshaikh MA, Lawrence TS. Radiotherapy: What can be achieved by technical improvements in dose delivery? Lancet Oncol. 2005;6:51–58. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(05)70026-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Kurimasa A, Kumano S, Boubnov NV, Story MD, Tung CS, Peterson SR, Chen DJ. Requirement for the kinase activity of human DNA-dependent protein kinase catalytic subunit in DNA strand break rejoining. Mol Cell Biol. 1999;19:3877–3884. doi: 10.1128/MCB.19.5.3877. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Beskow C, Skikuniene J, Holgersson A, Nilsson B, Lewensohn R, Kanter L, Viktorsson K. Radioresistant cervical cancer shows upregulation of the NHEJ proteins DNA-PKcs, Ku70 and Ku86. Br J Cancer. 2009;101:816–821. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Goodwin JF, Kothari V, Drake JM, Zhao S, Dylgjeri E, Dean JL, Schiewer MJ, McNair C, Jones JK, Aytes A, et al. DNA-PKcs-mediated transcriptional regulation drives prostate cancer progression and metastasis. Cancer Cell. 2015;28:97–113. doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2015.06.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Li W, Xie C, Yang Z, Chen J, Lu NH. Abnormal DNA-PKcs and Ku 70/80 expression may promote malignant pathological processes in gastric carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol. 2013;19:6894–6901. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i40.6894. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Lee HS, Yang HK, Kim WH, Choe G. Loss of DNA-dependent protein kinase catalytic subunit (DNA-PKcs) expression in gastric cancers. Cancer Res Treat. 2005;37:98–102. doi: 10.4143/crt.2005.37.2.98. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Hammarsten O, Chu G. DNA-dependent protein kinase: DNA binding and activation in the absence of Ku. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1998;95:525–530. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.2.525. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Rivera-Calzada A, Maman JD, Spagnolo L, Pearl LH, Llorca O. Three-dimensional structure and regulation of the DNA-dependent protein kinase catalytic subunit (DNA-PKcs) Structure. 2005;13:243–255. doi: 10.1016/j.str.2004.12.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Toulany M, Lee KJ, Fattah KR, Lin YF, Fehrenbacher B, Schaller M, Chen BP, Chen DJ, Rodemann HP. Akt promotes post-irradiation survival of human tumor cells through initiation, progression, and termination of DNA-PKcs-dependent DNA double-strand break repair. Mol Cancer Res. 2012;10:945–957. doi: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-11-0592. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Zheng B, Mao JH, Li XQ, Qian L, Zhu H, Gu DH, Pan XD. Over-expression of DNA-PKcs in renal cell carcinoma regulates mTORC2 activation, HIF-2α expression and cell proliferation. Sci Rep. 2016;6:29415. doi: 10.1038/srep29415. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Meggio F, Pinna LA. One-thousand-and-one substrates of protein kinase CK2? FASEB J. 2003;17:349–368. doi: 10.1096/fj.02-0473rev. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Li Q, Li K, Yang T, Zhang S, Zhou Y, Li Z, Xiong J, Zhou F, Zhou X, Liu L, et al. Association of protein kinase CK2 inhibition with cellular radiosensitivity of non-small cell lung cancer. Sci Rep. 2017;7:16134. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-16012-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Lin YC, Hung MS, Lin CK, Li JM, Lee KD, Li YC, Chen MF, Chen JK, Yang CT. CK2 inhibitors enhance the radiosensitivity of human non-small cell lung cancer cells through inhibition of stat3 activation. Cancer Biother Radiopharm. 2011;26:381–388. doi: 10.1089/cbr.2010.0917. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Kroonen J, Artesi M, Capraro V, Nguyen-Khac MT, Willems M, Chakravarti A, Bours V, Robe PA. Casein kinase 2 inhibition modulates the DNA damage response but fails to radiosensitize malignant glioma cells. Int J Oncol. 2012;41:776–782. doi: 10.3892/ijo.2012.1489. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Xu W, Chen Q, Wang Q, Sun Y, Wang S, Li A, Xu S, Røe OD, Wang M, Zhang R, et al. JWA reverses cisplatin resistance via the CK2-XRCC1 pathway in human gastric cancer cells. Cell Death Dis. 2014;5:e1551. doi: 10.1038/cddis.2014.27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Bae JS, Park SH, Kim KM, Kwon KS, Kim CY, Lee HK, Park BH, Park HS, Lee H, Moon WS, et al. CK2alpha phosphorylates DBC1 and is involved in the progression of gastric carcinoma and predicts poor survival of gastric carcinoma patients. Int J Cancer. 2015;136:797–809. doi: 10.1002/ijc.29043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.