Skip to main content
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2019 Jul 3;9:9602. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-46092-0

Xylem cavitation susceptibility and refilling mechanisms in olive trees infected by Xylella fastidiosa

Erika Sabella 1, Alessio Aprile 1,, Alessandra Genga 1, Tiziana Siciliano 2, Eliana Nutricati 1, Francesca Nicolì 1, Marzia Vergine 1, Carmine Negro 1, Luigi De Bellis 1, Andrea Luvisi 1
PMCID: PMC6610111  PMID: 31270378

Abstract

In olive trees, Xylella fastidiosa colonizes xylem vessels and compromises water transport causing the olive quick decline syndrome (OQDS). The loss of hydraulic conductivity could be attributed to vessel occlusions induced both by the bacteria biofilm and by plant responses (tyloses, gums, etc.) that could trigger embolism. The ability of the infected plants to detect embolism and to respond, by activating mechanisms to restore the hydraulic conductivity, can influence the severity of the disease symptomatology. In order to investigate these mechanisms in the X. fastidiosa-resistant olive cultivar Leccino and in the susceptible Cellina di Nardò, sections of healthy olive stems were analysed by laser scanning microscope to calculate the cavitation vulnerability index. Findings indicated that the cultivar Leccino seems to be constitutively less susceptible to cavitation than the susceptible one. Among the vascular refilling mechanisms, starch hydrolysis is a well-known strategy to refill xylem vessels that suffered cavitation and it is characterized by a dense accumulation of starch grains in the xylem parenchima; SEM-EDX analysis of stem cross-sections of infected plants revealed an aggregation of starch grains in the Leccino xylem vessels. These observations could indicate that this cultivar, as well as being anatomically less susceptible to cavitation, it also could be able to activate more efficient refilling mechanisms, restoring vessel’s hydraulic conductivity. In order to verify this hypothesis, we analysed the expression levels of some genes belonging to families involved in embolism sensing and refilling mechanisms: aquaporins, sucrose transporters, carbohydrate metabolism and enzymes related to starch breakdown, alpha and beta-amylase. The obtained genes expression patterns suggested that the infected plants of the cultivar Leccino strongly modulates the genes involved in embolism sensing and refilling.

Subject terms: Plant physiology, Environmental sciences

Introduction

Xylella fastidiosa, a gram-negative bacterium that colonizes xylem vessels, is transmitted to new host plants during sap feeding by insect vectors such as sharpshooter leafhoppers (Hemiptera, Cicadellidae) or spittlebugs (Hemiptera, Cercopidae) and spreads from the site of infection to the plant’s network of xylem vessels1. X. fastidiosa was recognized to be the causal agent of a number of so called leaf scorch diseases such as: Pierce’s disease (PD) of grapevine (Vitis vinifera), phony peach disease (PPD) in peach (Prunus persica), citrus variegated chlorosis (CVC) or citrus X disease, almond leaf scorch (ALS) in Prunus amygdalus and plum leaf scald (PLS) in Prunus domestica, coffee leaf scorch (CLS) in Coffea arabica and the oleander leaf scorch (OLS) in Nerium oleander2. Typical severe symptoms affect leaves and fruits causing significant economic loss2. Bacterial cells attach to the vessel wall and, by multiplying, they aggregate in a biofilm matrix that includes nucleic acids, proteins, humic substances, and exopolysaccharide (EPS); these biofilms protect bacterial communities from antibiotics, dehydration, host defences, and other stresses and contribute to virulence by allowing the coordinated expression of pathogenicity genes via quorum sensing3. It is conventionally thought that this biofilm is the main factor responsible for the blockage of water movement in X. fastidiosa infected plants; nevertheless, studies have found that vessel occlusions are also caused by the active host plants responses to the presence of the bacterium as defence response1,35. It was observed that in Pierce’s disease of grapevine a high proportion of colonized vessels in infected leaves were not blocked and instead had small colonies or solitary cells, suggesting that vessel blockage is not a colonization strategy employed by the pathogen but, rather, a by-product of endophytic colonization1. Stevenson et al.5, by following the progression of anatomical symptoms of Pierce’s disease in susceptible Vitis vinifera cv. Chardonnay grapevines, reported that leaf and petiole xylem was predominantly occluded with gums and bacteria, whereas, stem xylem was occluded almost exclusively with tyloses. Therefore, gums, pectin gels and X. fastidiosa biofilms contribute to the vascular obstruction3. This loss of xylem water-transporting function determines a decrease in stem-specific hydraulic conductivity. As for other vascular pathogens68, the phenomenon of vessel cavitation during the disease progression in infected plants could also explain the loss of hydraulic conductivity due to air filling of the vessels.

Pérez-Donoso et al.4 have reported early embolism in X. fastidiosa-infected grape and they have correlated this phenomenon with decreased xylem conductivity and drought stress. Nardini et al.9 summarized the mechanism utilized to restore hydraulic conductivity as the osmotic hypothesis. This hypothesis, proposes an active mechanism that may operate by refilling the embolized vessels with water and the driving force for refilling is generated by the enrichment of the sap with solutes that engages from inorganic and organic solutes (proteins, polysaccharides, etc.), to sugars derived from the hydrolysis of starch (degradation of starch in the parenchyma cells of the xylem produces soluble sugars that are released into the vessels, thereby promoting an osmotic flux of water into their lumen). Recently, X. fastidiosa was reported under field conditions in Italy (Apulia region), associated with severe cases of Olive Quick Decline Syndrome (OQDS)10,11; although the primary role of the bacterium in occlusions formation has been observed12, the pathogenesis and symptom formation in olive trees represent research challenges13 and mechanisms as vessel embolism induced by the pathogen have never been investigated in this host-pathogen association. The main objective of this work was to evaluate constitutive cavitation susceptibility and activation of refilling mechanisms to restore hydraulic conductivity in olive plants subjected to Xylella fastidiosa infection; the comparison between Cellina di Nardò and Leccino, respectively susceptible and resistant olive cultivars13,14, aimed to know if cavitation could play a role in determining the severity of symptoms caused by X. fastidiosa.

Materials and Methods

Plant materials and experimental design

Trials were carried out in two orchards near the city of Lecce (Parco Naturale Regionale Bosco e Paludi di Rauccio, 40°27′24.0″N 18°09′43.8″E, Apulia, Italy), in which olive trees of cv. Leccino and Cellina di Nardò were monitored since 2015. Selected plants (25–35 years) were characterized from the same agronomic practices in the last 5 years. Phytosanitary treatments were carried out according to EU Decision 2015/789 which is required to control the insect vector (Philaenus spumarius). Orchards were also weekly monitored to detect eventual insect or other pest outbreaks. Tree water status was assessed by Ψw measured every two weeks using a pressure chamber15. No irrigation was needed.

Leaf and branches samples were collected from X. fastidiosa-positive trees (Xf-p, 10 naturally infected plants per cultivar; according to visual inspections, the X. fastidiosa-positive trees of the cv Cellina di Nardò showed the typical symptoms of leaf scorching uniformly distributed in the canopy, instead cultivar Leccino exhibits mild symptoms) and X. fastidiosa-negative trees, (Xf-n, 10 plants/cultivar). The presence of X. fastidiosa was assessed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR)16. In both Xf-p and Xf-n samples, plants were monitored and tested for some of the most common pathogens in addition to X. fastidiosa, checking for symptoms caused by natural infection of Colletotrichum gloeosporioides, Mycocentrospora cladosporioides, Spilocaea oleagina and Pseudomonas savastanoi pv. savastanoi. Diagnostic tests (real-time PCR) were carried out on leaves or woody chips, according to protocols reported in the literature, for Verticillium dahliae17; Colletotrichum spp., C. acutatum, and C. gloeosporioides18; Phaeomoniella chlamydospora19; Phaeoacremonium aleophilum and P. parasiticum20,21; Botryosphaeria dothidea22; Diplodia seriata23 and Phytophthora spp.24 previously detected in South Italy25. Xf-p and Xf-n trees were negative to every test, apart some sporadic evidence of C. gloeosporioides, S. oleagina and P. savastanoi pv. savastanoi. However, we carried out the assessment of xylem vascular diameter and SEM/EDX analysis (see following sub-chapters) just on stem tissues in which these non-systemic pathogens were not achieved. Stem tissues from Xf-p and Xf-n trees were also used to analyse the expression of genes coding for aquaporins, starch and sucrose metabolism, sucrose transporters, enzymes related to starch breakdown, Alpha and Beta amylase.

Detection of X. fastidiosa in planta

Detection of the pathogen X. fastidiosa was carried out in both the leaves and the branches. Approximately 1 g of leaf petioles (a pool sample from 60 leaves collected from six branches) or vascular bundles (a pool sample from six branches) was transferred to an extraction bag (BIOREBA, Reinach, Switzerland) and 4 ml of extraction buffer (0.2 M Tris – HCl pH 9, 0.4 M LiCl and 25 mM EDTA) were added. Samples were homogenized using a semiautomatic homogenizer (Homex 6, BIOREBA) at 50% maximum speed. DNA extraction was performed following the protocol of Edwards et al.26. Briefly, the DNA solution is first extracted with a phenol-chloroform–isoamyl alcohol mixture to remove protein contaminants and then precipitated with 100% ethanol.

The PCR protocol with the primers X.fas-0838-a-S-21-X.fas-1439-a-A-19 and XYgyr499-RXYgyr90716 was used to confirm the infection of the samples with X. fastidiosa. Amplification was performed in a 25 μL reaction containing 0.2 μM concentrations of each primer, 200 μM concentrations of dNTPs, 1 x Taq buffer, 2.0 U of Taq DNA polymerase (TaKaRa, Kyoto, Japan), and 100 ng of DNA template. The PCR started with a 3 min denaturation step at 94 °C, followed by 30 cycles of denaturation at 94 °C for 1 min, primer annealing at 55 °C for 30 s, extension at 72 °C for 2 min, and final extension for 7 min.

Assessment of xylem vessel diameter and vulnerability to cavitation in olive stem

Stem of the Xf-n olive trees were excised with sterile razor blades, surface sterilized for 1 min in 70% ethanol and then rinsed three times in sterile distilled water. The cuttings (≈1.5 × 1.5 cm) were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde in phosphate-buffered saline (1x PBS, hereafter PBS) overnight at room temperature, followed by washing in PBS buffer for 10 min at room temperature. After fixation, samples were dehydrated by two successive 1-h incubations in each of 70, 80, 95, and 100% ethanol, then embedded in paraffin and cut into 30 μm-thick sections with a microtome Leica RM 2155 (Leica Microsystems, Mannheim, Germany). Sections were transferred to 1:1 (v/v) PBS:96% ethanol and maintained at −20 °C until staining. To dissolve the paraffin, sections were embedded in toluene for 3 min at 43 °C. After removing the toluene, all sections were stained with safranin solution (1%) to enhance contrast of wood against void space of vessels. Following the staining, sections were cleared and prepared for microscopic analyses (aqueous embedding on glass slides). All images were taken on a confocal laser-scanning microscope (Carl Zeiss LSM 700 laser scanning microscope, Jena, Germany); all images were acquired with the same microscope settings and analysed using ImageJ v1.46r.

The presented vessel diameter values are the means of more than 400 determinations (arithmetic vessel diameter and the vessel distribution were computed according to Scholz et al.27); xylem vessels were divided in six classes of diameter (0–15 µm; 15–30 µm; 30–45 µm; 45–60 µm; 60–75 µm; 75–90 µm).

The Student t-test was used to test the statistical significance of the differences found in the vessel density for different classes of diameter observed in the two studied cultivars.

Vulnerability to cavitation (vulnerability index, VI) was calculated using the equation proposed by Carlquist28, as follows:

VI=VD/VF

VF is vessel frequency (number of vessels per mm2, N/mm2), while VD is the mean vessel diameter (µm).

SEM/EDX wood analysis

Stem samples from Xf-p and Xf-n plant branches were examined with a scanning electron microscope (SEM). Sections handmade using razor blades were dehydrated by critical point step, mounted on aluminum stabs and sputter coated with three layers of gold before the SEM observation with a Tescan Vega LMU model coupled with an energy-dispersed spectrometry (EDS) microanalysis Bruker Quantax 800 (with a lower detection limit per element of less than 0.1%) at an accelerating voltage of 20 kV in high vacuum. An X-Ray spectrum has been collected for 120 sec for every SEM image. This allows us to recognize both the main elements and the trace elements to determine whether there were different chemical substances in the observed structures (tylose, starch, etc); the Student t-test was used to test the statistical significance of the differences found in the atomic percentages of the detected elements. Diameter of the starch granules were measured on SEM micrographs (1000 and 3000×) using software ImageJ 1.46r.

Total RNA isolation, cDNA synthesis and RT-PCR analysis of gene expression

Stem tissues from Xf-p and Xf-n plants were frozen in liquid nitrogen and total RNA was isolated from 0.1 gr of samples using TRIZOL (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, USA). cDNA synthesis was carried out using TaqMan® Reverse Transcription Reagents (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, USA) according to the manufacturer’s standard protocol. Amplification reactions were performed using a Biorad CFX96 Real-time PCR cycler and Biorad CFX manager software v3.1 (Bio-Rad, Irvine, CA, USA) using default settings for amplification curve analysis. Each reaction consisted of 13 ng of cDNA, 12.5 μL of Power SYBR Green RT-PCR Master mix (Applied Biosystems), 5.0 µM forward and reverse primers, ultrapure DNase/RNase-free water (Carlo Erba Reagents S.r.l.) in a total volume of 25 μL. The cycling conditions were: 2 min at 50 °C and 10 min at 95 °C, followed by 45 cycles of 95 °C for 15 s and 60 °C for 1 min. Melting curve analysis was performed after PCR to evaluate the presence of non-specific PCR products and primer dimers. Recent models on the embolism sensing and refilling mechanism describe as involved genes the following families: Aquaporins, Sucrose transporters, carbohydrate metabolism and enzymes related to starch breakdown, Alpha and Beta Amylase2931. The expression levels of some of these genes were analysed in stems of the olive trees Leccino and Cellina di Nardò, comparing Xf-p and Xf-n samples. The used primers were retrieved from the literature or designed with the software Primer Express Software 3.0 on the mRNA sequences deposited in GenBank (Table 1). β-Actin and the Elongation Factor 1-α that has been previously shown to have stable expression in Leccino stem32 and in O. europaea tissues33 were tested and used to normalize the expression levels of the target genes. The Student t-test was used to test the statistical significance of the differences found in the expression profile of genes.

Table 1.

Primers used for RT-PCR to measure expression levels of analysed genes.

Name sequence 5′-3′ Reference GenBank
Oeβ-Act_F ACTATGAACAGGATCTTGAG Rossi et al.32 AF545569.1
Oeβ-Act_R GAACCACCACTGAGGACGAT
OeEF1-α_F CTGACTGCGCCGTCCTTATC Alagna et al.63 XM_002527974.1
OeEF1-α_R TGACACCAAGGGTGAAGGC
OePIP1_F GGCATATAAATCCGGCAGTGA DQ202708.1
OePIP1_R CGGGTCAACGACAATTTCCT
OePIP2_F TGCCACCATCCCCATCAC DQ202709.2
OePIP2_R GATGACAGCAGCTCCAAAGCT
OeTIP_F CGGCGGCCACGTAAAC DQ202710.1
OeTIP_R CAATGTGATGTGACCACCAACA
Oeβ-Amy_F ATATGATGACTACGCCCACGAA JQ711506.1
Oeβ-Amy_R CGATGCCATCAACATTCAAATG
Oeβ-Amy1_F TGCCACGATATGATGACTACGC Alagna et al.63 unigene01162
Oeβ-Amy1_R TCAGGTTGGAACAAATCCGGGTTC
Oeα-Amy2_F CGGAGACGCGGTGGAAT XM_022987933.1
Oeα-Amy2_R CCGTCATTATGAGCATGGTATATTTTT
Oeα-Amy_F ATCAGGACAGGCATCGGAAT XM_023038990.1
Oeα-Amy_R GACACTGCCTCCCGCATT
OeMST2_F GCCAATGTGGACGAGGAGTT DQ087177.2
OeMST2_R TGCTCCACCTTCCTCGACTCT
OeSUT1_F TCGGTTATGCGGCTGGAT JN656245.1
OeSUT1_R CAGGCTTTTGTTTTGGTAAATGG
OeSUSy_F GCCTGGACTCTACCGAGTTGTT Alagna et al.63 unigene02089
OeSUSy_R CACGCATAGGTGTTCCTTGTTC
OeINV-V_F CCAGTCAGCGAAGTGGAAGAAT Alagna et al.63 unigene01665
OeINV-V_R TGTAACCAGCATCAGCATCAGC
OeINV-CW_F AGACAAGGCAGAGACATTCGAC Alagna et al.63 unigene02494
OeINV-CW_R ATGCATCAGAGCACATGAGAAC
OeGBSSI_F TGTGCCAAAGTCGACCCTGCCG Alagna et al.63 unigene00185
OeGBSSI_R TGGTTCACTGCTGGCAGCCCC

Results and Discussion

Xylem vessel diameter and vulnerability to cavitation in stem of Leccino and Cellina di Nardò

With regard to the number of vessels per diameter class, Student t-test showed a significant effect of cultivar for the diameter class 0–15 µm (P < 0.05), diameter class 15–30 µm (P < 0.01) and classes 45–60 µm and 60–75 µm (P < 0.001) (Table 2): our results indicated that the cultivar Leccino, reported as the resistant cultivar, displayed a higher number of small diameter vessels (0–15 µm and 15–30 µm) compared to the susceptible cultivar Cellina di Nardò, which displayed a higher number of wide diameter vessels (45–60 µm and 60–75 µm) (Fig. 1). Moreover, the two cultivars differed also for the overall distribution of vessel sizes. The Leccino graph showed a Gaussian distribution curve with a narrow base (median = 26), whereas the base of Cellina di Nardò Gaussian curve is larger (median = 45) (Fig. 1). These data suggested that Leccino cultivar is characterized by a tighter and more homogeneous vessel apparatus if compared to Cellina di Nardò ones.

Table 2.

T-test outputs of the vessel diameter classes comparison between the stems of the cvs. Leccino and Cellina di Nardò.

Vessel diameter classes
0–15 µm 15–30 µm 30–45 µm 45–60 µm 60–75 µm 75–90 µm
Cultivar 0.0319* 0.0082** 0.1450 0.0003*** 0.0005*** 0.1261

*Significance at P < 0.05; **Significance at P < 0.01; ***Significance at P < 0.001.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Diameter classes of the xylem vessels in the stems of the cvs. Leccino and Cellina di Nardò. (A) Transverse sections of olive stems stained with safranin solution to enhance void space of xylem vessels. (B) Distribution of xylem vessels diameter observed in the stem of Olea europaea cvs. Leccino and Cellina di Nardò. Please see Table 2 for further statistical analysis.

Previous works speculated on the role of vessel diameter as factor influencing plant’s susceptibility to xylem-dwelling pathogens and several cases have been described where resistance is related to shorter and smaller vessels. Chatelet et al.34 examined the vascular anatomy of 12 grape varieties as X. fastidiosa’s hosts and found that tolerant host plants had narrower vessels; they supposed a decrease in the motility of bacteria within the xylem vessels. The implications of xylem structure on the pathogen movement are discussed by Elgersma35 that reported length and diameter of xylem vessels as factors in resistance of elms to Ophiostoma ulmi (syn. Ceratocystis ulmi) due to a limited spreading of the fungus’s spores in the narrowed vessels, so the percentage of vessels with a large diameter was smaller in resistant elms than in susceptible ones. Another focus of the vessels anatomy studies in relation to vascular disease is the cavitation induced by pathogen infections. The loss of hydraulic conductivity could be attributed both to vascular pathogen growth and to plant responses7. Tyloses and gels production is a well-known plant defence response to halt the pathogens spreading. Sun et al.36 showed a quantitative comparison of vascular occlusions in the Pierce’s Disease susceptible versus resistant grapevine genotypes; they found tyloses as the predominant type of occlusion and correlated them with the larger vessels. According to their data, tyloses occlusions does not prevent the pathogen’s systemic spread but they could significantly impede water conduction contributing to disease symptoms development in the susceptible genotypes. Similarly, Pouzoulet et al.37 described an increased susceptibility to the vascular pathogen Phaemoniella chlamydospora in grapevines with wide vessel diameter since fungal compartmentalization was more efficient in wide vessels and also because large vessels displayed a higher quantity of tyloses and occlusions that create a favorable environment for the pathogen’s growth and reduce plant’s hydraulic conductance. Since cavitation assumes a key role in the symptoms development of vascular pathogens as the bacterium X. fastidiosa, vulnerability to cavitation (vulnerability index, VI) was calculated. Vulnerability index of the Cellina di Nardò showed that this cultivar was almost 2 times more vulnerable than the cultivar Leccino (Table 3).

Table 3.

Anatomical characters and Vulnerability index (VI) of the olive cultivars Cellina di Nardò and Leccino.

Cultivar VD (µm) VF (N/mm2) VI
Cellina di Nardò 45.70 ± 11.29*** 36.60 ± 2.76*** 1.25
Leccino 27.46 ± 9.49*** 40.70 ± 2.18*** 0.67

VD = Vessel diameter, VF = Vessel frequency (number of vessels per mm2, N/mm2), VI = Vulnerability index.

***Significance at P < 0.001.

Table 3 also shows that vessels frequency was lower in the stem of the cultivar Cellina di Nardò.

SEM/EDX analysis

Against the observed background, the mechanisms capable to refill xylem vessels could be important factors in vascular wilt diseases resistance. Among the embolism repair mechanisms, starch degradation (from parenchyma cells of the xylem to soluble sugars that promotes osmotic water flux capable to refill hydraulic conductivity) is well-known and it is characterized by a dense accumulation of starch grains in the xylem parenchima38 that could be revealed by the SEM analysis of the stem cross-sections.

In sections from Xf-n samples, vessels appeared free of occlusions (Fig. 2A,B).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Scanning electron photomicrograph of Leccino and Cellina di Nardò stem cross-sections. (A) Stem cross-section of Xf-n Cellina di Nardò. (B) Stem cross-section of Xf-n Leccino. In sections from Xf-n samples, vessels appeared free of occlusions. (CE) Stem cross-sections of Xf-p Leccino; scanning electron photomicrographs of xylem parenchyma reveals a dense accumulation of starch grains. (F,G) Stem cross-sections of Xf-p Cellina di Nardò. In stem’s sections from infected Cellina di Nardò trees, tyloses (indicated by green arrows) and crystals (indicated by red arrows) were observed. Xf − n = X. fastidiosa negative samples; Xf − p = X. fastidiosa positive samples.

Only in the cross-sections from the stems of infected Leccino were observed starch grains (Fig. 2C–E); they appeared as spherical structures with an average diameter of 4.01 ± 1.02 µm. Figure 3 shows the result of the elemental analyses of the starch grains conducted by SEM/EDX. Since starch is constituted by glucose units, the presence of the three elements carbon (C), hydrogen (H) and oxygen (O) would be expected; however, only C and O can be detected; H is not distinguished as there are no core electrons in hydrogen but only valence electrons. In addition, the signals emitted from H 1 s valence electrons would overlap with signals of other valence electrons and would not be possible for identification39. The atomic percentages of C and O in the observed grains gave an elemental signature that is characteristic of starch according to the data reported in literature40,41 and it showed statistically significant differences in comparison with the cell wall composition of the xylem vessel (Fig. 4).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

EDX analysis of the starch grains. The SEM/EDX analysis indicated that the structure of the starch grains was composed of carbon and oxygen with atomic percentages that are characteristic of starch according to the data reported in literature40,41.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Quantitative results of the elemental analysis of cell wall, tyloses and starch grains. Carbon (C) and oxygen (O) distribution in cell wall, tyloses and starch grains observed in stem cross-sections of Leccino and Cellina di Nardò. The atomic percentages of C and O in the observed grains showed statistically significant differences in comparison with the cell wall composition of the xylem vessel according to Student t-test (*P < 0.05; **P < 0.01). The observed masses hypothesized to be tyloses exhibited no differences when compared with the cell wall composition.

In stem’s sections from infected Cellina di Nardò trees, tyloses and crystals were observed (Fig. 2F,G). Tyloses differed from starch grains for size and composition; tyloses were found in some vessels as masses of different sizes (the average diameter, assuming these structures as circles, is 2.04 ± 0.60 µm; tyloses size showed a statistically significant difference in comparison with starch grains according to Student t-test, P < 0.001) and sometimes they appeared as partially included in the cell wall of the vessel’s lumen; about the composition, the energy-dispersive X-ray (EDX) analysis showed no differences between the cell wall composition and the observed masses (Fig. 4); this is reasonable since tyloses are outgrowths on parenchyma cells of xylem vessels42.

Several studies have documented a dense accumulation of starch grains in the vessel’s cells as an integral part of embolism recovery: Masrahi et al.43 observed in xylem parenchima of the two lianas Cocculus pendulus and Leptadenia arborea a great quantity of starch grains that can reduce the solute potential of xylem sap improving the upward flow of water, this proposed strategy could help plants to repair air filled vessels and to survive in the water deficit of their severe habitat. Starch granules are readily apparent in the fibers of grapevine xylem and it was proposed that they generated an osmotic driving force for refilling38. Bucci et al.44 explained that the abundant starch granules observed in the vessels of the two savanna tree species Schefflera macrocarpa and Caryocar Brasiliense could intensificate vascular water uptake by increasing osmotically active solutes. Finally, according to Nardini et al.9, starch depolymerization is apparently activated during xylem refilling and treatments that repress refilling also inhibit starch hydrolysis both in the lab and in field-grown plants.

According to our obtained data, the cultivar Leccino seems to be less susceptible to cavitation and able to activate more efficient refilling mechanisms restoring vessel’s hydraulic conductivity.

Expression of gene families involved in embolism sensing and refilling mechanism

In order to verify the suggested hypothesis of a more efficient strategy to restore vessel’s conductivity in the cultivar Leccino, we analysed the expression levels of the gene families involved in embolism sensing and refilling mechanism. In the Fig. 5 are reported the expression levels of the genes coding for three aquaporins: OePIP1.1, OePIP2.1 and OeTIP1.1. Aquaporins belong to a highly conserved group membrane major intrinsic protein (MIPs), they are found in the cell membranes of all living organisms and allow water flux across membranes45. In plants, the aquaporins can increase the hydraulic conductivity of the membrane by 10- to 20-fold46. In the two analysed cultivars, the OePIP1.1 transcript did not significantly change in response to the X. fastidiosa infection; OePIP2.1 resulted upregulated in the cultivar Leccino (fold change = 2.04 ± 0.17) whereas in the cultivar Cellina di Nardò its level didn’t result significantly modified. According to Secchi et al.47 that conducted experiments in a heterologous system like Xenopus oocyte, it has been observed that OePIP2.1 water transport activity is much more effective than that of OePIP1.1. OeTIP1.1 resulted strongly upregulated in the cultivar Leccino (fold change = 15.92 ± 1.02) and upregulated also in the stems of the infected Cellina di Nardò (fold change = 2.16 ± 0.31) indicating a plant disease response. According to the obtained data, in the cultivar Leccino, the genes coding for the aquaporins showed more interesting expression profiles in X. fastidiosa infected stems and OeTIP1.1 deserve specific attention. Secchi et al.47 investigated the tissue-specific expression of these three aquaporin genes and found that OeTIP1.1 was the aquaporin with a stem-specific expression while in root and leaves the expression was low. In the Fig. 5 expression data of the genes coding for the following α- and β-amylases and sugar transporters are reported: OeAMY, OeAMY2, OeBMY, OeBMY1, OeSUT1 and OeMST2. In the stems of the cultivar Cellina di Nardò, only the gene OeAMY was upregulated in the X. fastidiosa infected trees (fold change = 2.42 ± 0.35); whereas, in the stems of the infected Leccino trees, were upregulated the genes: OeAMY (fold change = 10.20 ± 0.92), OeAMY2 (fold change = 9.51 ± 0.62), OeSUT1 (fold change = 2.74 ± 0.35) and OeMST2 (fold change = 5.79 ± 0.22). According to Secchi et al.30, that studied transcriptome response to embolism formation in stems of Populus trichocarpa, the upregulation of amylases and sugar transporters were among the major biological activities associated with the proposed response of parenchyma cells to embolism. The proposed refilling mechanism is linked to starch to sugars conversion that increases the solute concentration of the residual water in the vessel’s lumens thus promoting xylem refilling by altering the osmotic potential29,30. The strongly upregulation of the genes coding for α-amylases and sugar transporters in the stems of infected Leccino trees could be correlated to an active response to restore hydraulic transport capacity during vessel cavitation as previously proposed for other plant species4850.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Expression of genes involved in embolism sensing and refilling mechanisms in X. fastidiosa infected Leccino and Cellina di Nardò plants. Quantitative analyses of expression of genes coding for aquaporins, sucrose transporters, enzymes of the carbohydrate metabolism and enzymes related to starch breakdown, Alpha and Beta Amylase. OePIP1.1 and OePIP2.1 = Olea europaea Plasma Membrane Intrinsic Protein 1.1 and 2.1; OeTIP1.1 = Olea europaea Tonoplast Intrinsic Protein 1.1; OeInv-V = Olea europaea Vacuolar Invertase; OeInv-CW = Olea europaea Cell Wall Invertase; OeGBSSI = Olea europaea Granule-Bound Starch Synthase I; OeSusy = Olea europaea Sucrose Synthase; OeMST2 = Olea europaea Monosaccharide Transporter 2; OeSUT1 = Olea europaea Sucrose Transporter 1; OeAMY and OeAMY2 = Olea europaea α-Amylases; OeBMY and OeBMY1 = Olea europaea β-Amylases. The significant differences were highlighted according to Student t-test (*P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001).

The ability to activate refilling mechanisms in response to cavitation requires efficient mechanisms of embolism sensing. Secchi and Zwieniecki51 proposed the sucrose as stimulus to sense embolism; in fact, they demonstrated that the only presence of sucrose activated physiological and molecular response similar to that induced by embolism (upregulation of aquaporins, amylases and sugar transporters family). Therefore, sucrose is a central molecule for sensing during plant defence against pathogens; there are two alternative routes of sucrolytic carbohydrate mobilization: one is reversible and is catalyzed by the sucrose synthase (SUSY); the other route is the irreversible hydrolytic cleavage by invertases (INVs). There are three groups of INV enzymes: the alkaline/neutral invertases (A/NInv) localized in cytosol, mitochondria and/or in plastids and two types of acid invertases, the insoluble one bound to the cell wall (cell wall invertase, CWI) and a soluble one found in the vacuole space (vacuolar invertase, VI); the alkaline/neutral invertases are involved in plant growth and development while the acid invertases are also modulated during plant infection52. The expression levels of the genes OeSusy, OeInv-CW, OeInv-V in the stems of infected Leccino and Cellina di Nardò trees are reported in the Fig. 5.

The level of expression of OeSusy was higher (fold change = 3.13 ± 0.30) only in stems of infected Leccino plants (Fig. 5). The genes coding for the acid invertases, OeInv-CW and OeInv-V resulted respectively stable in infected plants in comparison to healthy ones of the two cultivars (Fig. 5) while OeInv-V was strongly downregulated in the cultivar Leccino (fold change = −10.47 ± 0.89).

The activity of the sucrose synthase and of the acid invertases were suggested to be involved in plant stress responses and signaling cascades (reviewed by Bolouri-Moghaddam et al.53). Susy transcript levels increased in nematode infected Arabidopsis thaliana plants54 and in different Vitis vinifera varieties undergoing phytoplasma infection55.

Further, the expression of the different INVs was found to be related to plant defence: a reduction of Inv-V expression has been observed during the infection of Vicia faba by Uromyces fabae and Vitis vinifera by Erysiphe necator and Plasmopara viticola56,57. This down-regulation was attributed to a decrease in the availability of sucrose in the storage compartment56,57. Other works reported a decrease in the starch content during pathogen infection suggesting that the degradation of starch provides more substrates to sucrose synthesis52. Interestingly, the gene coding for GBSSI (Granule-Bound Starch Synthase I), the most important enzyme in storage starch biosynthesis58 resulted strongly downregulated both in the stems of Leccino (fold change = −62.61 ± 1.14) and in the Cellina di Nardò (fold change = −7.98 ± 0.42) infected trees (Fig. 5); this inhibition of the OeGBSSI expression could indicate the block of the conversion of sucrose to starch, supporting the sucrose’s role as signaling molecule, or its involvement in other plant defence mechanisms. Sure enough, Wall et al.59 reported GBSSI as a protein related to defence and in the work of Yi et al.60 GBSSI resulted among the downregulated gene in rice plants infected with Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae. Thus, also in relation to the mechanisms that involves sucrose as important signal molecule for embolism and plant defence response, in the infected plants of the cultivar Leccino the transcript levels of the above genes showed more interesting expression patterns. Moreover, sucrose has been described as an inducer of the phenylpropanoid pathway61 that leads to the biosynthesis of lignin which has already been associated with the major X. fastidiosa resistance of the cultivar Leccino62.

Conclusion

Here we reported, for the first time, the measurement of the xylem vessels diameter in the two Olea europaea cultivars Leccino and Cellina di Nardò; these anatomical features, as described in the previous sections, may provide an indication of susceptibility/resistance to Xylella fastidiosa. In the Olea europaea plants, as for the other plant species affected by X. fastidiosa, the symptoms development is correlated with a decrease of xylem water-transporting function that could cause embolism. We hypothesized that differences in cavitation susceptibility determined by the constitutive anatomy of the xylem and a major capacity to active refilling mechanisms after embolism sensing could be involved in the specific cultivar response to the pathogen.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank farmers Ingallo Cosimo and Mancarella Raffaele for their support in field observations.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: E.S., A.A., A.L., L.D.B. Performed the experiments on SEM/EDX: E.S., A.G., T.S. Performed the experiments on pathogens: A.A., E.S., A.L. Performed the experiments on genes expression: E.S., E.N., F.N. Analysed the data: E.S., A.A. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: C.N., M.V. Wrote the paper: E.S., A.A., A.L. The authors all have given approval to the final version of the manuscript.

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Newman KL, Almeida RPP, Purcell AH, Lindow SE. Use of a Green Fluorescent Strain for Analysis of Xylella fastidiosa Colonization of Vitis vinifera”. Appl. Environ. Microb. 2003;69:7319–7327. doi: 10.1128/AEM.69.12.7319-7327.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Janse JD, Obradovic A. Xylella fastidiosa: its biology, diagnosis, control and risks. J. Plant. Pathol. 2010;92:S1.35–S1.48. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Roper MC, Greve LC, Labavitch JM, Kirkpatrick BC. Detection and Visualization of an Exopolysaccharide Produced by Xylella fastidiosa In Vitro and In. Planta. Appl. Environ. Microb. 2007;73:7252–7258. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00895-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Pérez-Donoso AG, Greve LC, Walton JH, Shackel KA, Labavitch JM. Xylella fastidiosa Infection and Ethylene Exposure Result in Xylem and Water Movement Disruption in Grapevine Shoots. Plant Physiol. 2007;143:1024–1036. doi: 10.1104/pp.106.087023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Stevenson JF, Matthews MA, Greve LC, Labavitch JM, Rost TL. Grapevine susceptibility to Pierce’s disease. II. The progression of anatomical symptoms. Am. J. Enol. Viticult. 2004;55:238–245. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Martìn JA, Solla A, Ruiz-Villar M, Gil L. Vessel length and conductivity of Ulmus branches: ontogenetic changes and relation to resistance to Dutch elm disease. Trees. 2013;27:1239–1248. doi: 10.1007/s00468-013-0872-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Yadeta KA, Thomma BPHJ. The xylem as battleground for plant hosts and vascular wilt pathogens. Front. Plant Sci. 2013;4:97. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2013.00097. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Pouzoulet J, Pivovaroff AL, Santiago LS, Rolshausen PE. Can vessel dimension explain tolerance toward fungal vascular wilt diseases in woody plants? Lessons from Dutch elm disease and esca disease in grapevine. Front. Plant Sci. 2014;5:253. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2014.00253. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Nardini A, Lo Gullo MA, Salleo S. Refilling embolized xylem conduits: Is it a matter of phloem unloading? Plant Sci. 2011;180:604–611. doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2010.12.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Saponari M, Boscia D, Nigro F, Martelli GP. Identification of DNA sequences related to Xylella fastidiosa in oleander, almond and olive trees exhibiting leaf scorch symptoms in Apulia (Southern Italy) J. Plant. Pathol. 2013;95:668. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Luvisi A, Nicolì F, De Bellis L. Sustainable management of plant quarantine pests: The case of olive quick decline syndrome. Sustainability. 2017;9:659. doi: 10.3390/su9040659. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Cardinale M, et al. Specific Fluorescence in Situ Hybridization (FISH) Test to Highlight Colonization of Xylem Vessels by Xylella fastidiosa in Naturally Infected Olive Trees (Olea europaea L.) Front. Plant Sci. 2018;9:431. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.00431. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Luvisi A, et al. Xylella fastidiosa subsp. pauca (CoDiRO strain) infection in four olive (Olea europaea L.) cultivars: Profile of phenolic compounds in leaves and progression of leaf scorch symptoms. Phytopathol. Mediterr. 2017;56:259–273. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Saponari M, et al. Isolation and pathogenicity of Xylella fastidiosa associated to the olive quick decline syndrome in southern Italy. Sci. Rep. 2017;7:17723. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-17957-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Gucci R, Massai R, Casano S, Mazzoleni S. Seasonal changes in the water relations of six Mediterranean woody species. Plant Biosyst. 1999;133:117–128. doi: 10.1080/11263509909381540. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Rodrigues JLM, Silva-Stenico ME, Gomes JE, Lopes JRS, Tsai SM. Detection and diversity assessment of Xylella fastidiosa in field-collected plant and insect samples by using 16S rRNA and gyrB sequences. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2003;69:4249–4255. doi: 10.1128/AEM.69.7.4249-4255.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Bilodeau GJ, Koike ST, Uribe P, Martin FN. Development of an assay for rapid detection and quantification of Verticillium dahliae in soil. Phytopathology. 2012;102:331–343. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO-05-11-0130. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Garrido C, et al. Development of protocols for detection of Colletotrichum acutatum and monitoring of strawberry anthracnose using qPCR. Plant Pathol. 2009;58:43–51. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3059.2008.01933.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Martín MT, Cobos R, Martín L, López-Enríquez L. qPCR Detection of Phaeomoniella chlamydospora and Phaeoacremonium aleophilum. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2012;78:3985–3991. doi: 10.1128/AEM.07360-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Aroca A, Raposo R, Lunello P. A biomarker for the identification of four Phaeoacremonium species using the β-tubulin gene as the target sequence. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2008;80:1131–1140. doi: 10.1007/s00253-008-1647-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Carlucci A, Lops F, Cibelli F, Raimondo ML. Phaeoacremonium species associated with olive wilt and decline in Southern Italy. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 2015;141:717–729. doi: 10.1007/s10658-014-0573-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Romanazzi G, Murolo S, Pizzichini L, Nardi S. Esca in young and mature vineyards: and molecular diagnosis of the associated fungi. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 2009;125:277–290. doi: 10.1007/s10658-009-9481-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Martín MT, Cuesta MJ, Martín L. Development of SCAR primers for PCR assay to detect Diplodia seriata. Int. Sch. Res. Notices. 2014;2014:824106. doi: 10.1155/2014/824106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Drenth A, et al. Development of a DNA-based method for detection and identification of Phytophthora species. Aust. Plant Pathol. 2006;35:147–159. doi: 10.1071/AP06018. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Cacciola SO, Agosteo GE, Magnano di San Lio G. Collar and root rot of olive trees caused by Phytophthora megasperma in Sicily. Plant Dis. 2001;85:96. doi: 10.1094/PDIS.2001.85.1.96A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Edwards K, Johnstone C, Thompson C. A simple and rapid method for the preparation of plant genomic DNA for PCR analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 1991;19:1349. doi: 10.1093/nar/19.6.1349. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Scholz A, Klepsch M, Karimi Z, Jansen S. How to quantify conduits in wood? Front. Plant Sci. 2013;4:56. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2013.00056. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Carlquist S. Ecological factors in wood evolution: a floristic approach. Am. J. Bot. 1977;64:887–896. doi: 10.1002/j.1537-2197.1977.tb11932.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Sengupta, S. & Majumder, A. L. Physiological and genomic basis of mechanical-functional trade-off in plant vasculature. Front. Plant Sci. 5, 10.3389/fpls.2014.00224 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 30.Secchi F, Gilbert ME, Zwieniecki MA. Transcriptome Response to Embolism Formation in Stems of Populus trichocarpa Provides Insight into Signaling and the Biology of Refilling. Plant Physiol. 2011;157:1419–1429. doi: 10.1104/pp.111.185124. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Secchi F, Zwieniecki MA. Analysis of Xylem Sap from Functional (Non embolized) and Nonfunctional (Embolized) Vessels of Populus nigra: Chemistry of Refilling. Plant Physiol. 2012;160:955–964. doi: 10.1104/pp.112.200824. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Rossi L, et al. Salt stress induces differential regulation of the phenylpropanoid pathway in Olea europaea cultivars Frantoio (salt-tolerant) and Leccino (salt-sensitive) J. Plant. Physiol. 2016;204:8–15. doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2016.07.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Ray DL, Johnson JC. Validation of reference genes for gene expression analysis in olive (Olea europaea) mesocarp tissue by quantitative real-time RT-PCR. BMC Research Notes. 2014;7:304. doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-7-304. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Chatelet DS, Wistrom CM, Purcell AH, Rost TL, Matthews MA. Xylem structure of four grape varieties and 12 alternative hosts to the xylem-limited bacterium Xylella fastidiosa. Ann. Bot. 2011;108:73–85. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcr106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Elgersma DM. Length and diameter of xylem vessels as factors in resistance of elms to Ceratocystis ulmi. Neth. J. Pl. Path. 1970;76:179–182. doi: 10.1007/BF01974328. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Sun Q, Sun Y, Walker MA, Labavitch JM. Vascular Occlusions in Grapevines with Pierce’s Disease Make Disease Symptom Development Worse. Plant Physiol. 2013;161:1529–1541. doi: 10.1104/pp.112.208157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Pouzoulet, J., Scudiero, E., Schiavon, M. & Rolshausen, P. E. Xylem Vessel Diameter Affects the Compartmentalization of the Vascular Pathogen Phaeomoniella chlamydospora in Grapevine. Front. Plant Sci. 8, 1442, 10.3389/fpls.2017.01442 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 38. Brodersen, C. R. & McElrone, A. J. Maintenance of xylem network transport capacity: a review of embolism repair in vascular plants. Front. Plant Sci. 4, 10.3389/fpls.2013.00108 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 39.Stojilovic N. Why can’t we see hydrogen in X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy? J. Chem. Educ. 2012;89:1331–1332. doi: 10.1021/ed300057j. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Gunduz G, et al. Physical, morphological properties and Raman spectroscopy of chestnut blight diseased Castanea sativa Mill. wood. CERNE. 2016;22:43–58. doi: 10.1590/01047760201622012101. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Power RC, Salazar-García DC, Wittig RM, Henry AG. Assessing use and suitability of scanning electron microscopy in the analysis of micro remains in dental calculus. J. Archaeol. Sci. 2014;49:160–169. doi: 10.1016/j.jas.2014.04.016. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Esau, K. Anatomy of seed plants (2nd ed. John Wiley and Sons, Inc.) New York, USA (1977).
  • 43.Masrahi YS. Ecological significance of wood anatomy in two lianas from arid southwestern Saudi Arabia. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2014;21:334–341. doi: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2013.11.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Bucci SJ, et al. Dynamic changes in hydraulic conductivity in petioles of two savanna tree species: factors and mechanisms contributing to the refilling of embolized vessels. Plant Cell Environ. 2003;26:1633–1645. doi: 10.1046/j.0140-7791.2003.01082.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Tyerman SD, Niemietz CM, Bramley H. Plant aquaporins: multifunctional water and solute channels with expanding roles. Plant Cell Environ. 2002;25:173–194. doi: 10.1046/j.0016-8025.2001.00791.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Preston GM, Carroll TP, Guggino WB, Agree P. Appearance of water channels in Xenopus oocytes expressing red cell CHIP28 protein. Science. 1992;256:385–387. doi: 10.1126/science.256.5055.385. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Secchi F, Lovisolo C, Uehlein N, Kaldenhoff R, Schubert A. Isolation and functional characterization of three aquaporins from olive (Olea europaea L.) Planta. 2007;225:381–392. doi: 10.1007/s00425-006-0365-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Steudle E. The cohesion-tension mechanism and the acquisition of water by plant roots. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 2001;52:847–875. doi: 10.1146/annurev.arplant.52.1.847. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Améglio T, et al. Temperature effects on xylem sap osmolarity in walnut trees: evidence for a vitalistic model of winter embolism repair. Tree Physiol. 2004;24:785–793. doi: 10.1093/treephys/24.7.785. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Salleo S, Trililò P, Esposito S, Nardini A, Lo Gullo MA. Starch-to sugar conversion in wood parenchyma of field-growing Laurus nobilis plants: a component of the signal pathway for embolism repair? Funct. Plant Biol. 2009;36:815–825. doi: 10.1071/FP09103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Secchi F, Zwieniecki MA. Sensing embolism in xylem vessels: the role of sucrose as a trigger for refilling. Plant Cell Environ. 2011;34:514–524. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2010.02259.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Tauzin, A. S. & Giardina, T. Sucrose and Invertases, a part of the plant defense response to the biotic stresses. Front. Plant Sci5, 10.3389/fpls.2014.00293 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 53.Bolouri-Moghaddam MR, Le Roy K, Xiang L, Rolland F, Van den Ende W. Sugar signalling and antioxidant network connections in plant cells. FEBS Journal. 2010;277:2022–2037. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2010.07633.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Cabello S, et al. Altered sucrose synthase and invertase expression affects the local and systemic sugar metabolism of nematode infected Arabidopsis thaliana plants. J. Exp. Bot. 2014;65:201–212. doi: 10.1093/jxb/ert359. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Hren M, et al. Induced expression of sucrose synthase and alcohol dehydrogenase I genes in phytoplasma infected grapevine plants grown in the field. Plant Pathol. 2009;58:170–180. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3059.2008.01904.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Voegele RT, Wirsel S, Moll U, Lechner M, Mendgen K. Cloning and characterization of a novel invertase from the obligate biotroph Uromyces fabae and analysis of expression patterns of host and pathogen invertases in the course of infection. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 2006;19:625–634. doi: 10.1094/MPMI-19-0625. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Hayes MA, Feechan A, Dry IB. Involvement of abscisic acid in the coordinated regulation of a stress-inducible hexose transporter (VvHT5) and a cell wall invertase in grapevine in response to biotrophic fungal infection. Plant Physiol. 2010;153:211–221. doi: 10.1104/pp.110.154765. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Wang S-J, Yeh K-W, Tsai C-Y. Regulation of starch granule-bound starch synthase I gene expression by circadian clock and sucrose in the source tissue of sweet potato. Plant Science. 2001;161:635–644. doi: 10.1016/S0168-9452(01)00449-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Wall ML, Wheeler HL, Smith J, Figeys D, Altosaar I. Mass Spectrometric Analysis Reveals Remnants of Host–Pathogen Molecular Interactions at the Starch Granule Surface in Wheat Endosperm. Phytopatol. 2010;100:848–854. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO-100-9-0848. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Yi SY, et al. Microarray Analysis of bacterial blight resistance 1 mutant rice infected with Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae. Plant Breed. Biotech. 2013;1:354–365. doi: 10.9787/PBB.2013.1.4.354. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Morkunas I, Narozna D, Nowak W, Samardakiewicz S, Remlein-Starosta D. Cross-talk interactions of sucrose and Fusarium oxysporum in the phenylpropanoid pathway and the accumulation and localization of flavonoids in embryo axes of yellow lupine. J. Plant Physiol. 2011;168:424–433. doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2010.08.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Sabella E, et al. Xylella fastidiosa induces differential expression of lignification related-genes and lignin accumulation in tolerant olive trees cv. Leccino. J. Plant Physiol. 2018;220:60–68. doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2017.10.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Alagna F, et al. Transcript Analysis and Regulative Events during Flower Development in Olive (Olea europaea L.) PLoS One. 2016;11:e0152943. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0152943. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES