Abstract
Background
Ultrastructural and immunohistochemical differences have been described in FDCs of primary and secondary follicles, illustrating the highly compartmentalized structure of lymph follicles. Differences in FDC immunophenotype in different grades of FL may reflect some parallelism between reactive and neoplastic conditions in terms of FDC-B cell interaction and may be used as a valuable additional tool for grading FL.
Methods
A total of 60 paraffin blocks from patients with follicular lymphoma, 30 cases each of grade 1 and 3, were retrieved from our archive. Immunohistochemical analysis was carried out for CD21, CD23, cyclin A, and Ki-67.
Results
Our study demonstrates that during evaluation, six patterns of FDC distribution were distinguished. The intensity of stain for CD21 was not statistically significant in grade 1 and grade 3 FL (p = 0.340). In contrast, grade 3 FLs exhibited a significant decrease of CD23 expression by the FDCs (p < 0.001). By CD21 stain, there was no significant difference in the distribution of pattern 1 in grades 1 and 3 (p = 0.098). In contrast, in grade 3, this pattern was significantly less observed by CD23 stain (p = 0.016). The same was observed for pattern 2 for CD21 (p = 0.940) and CD23 (p = 0.010) and pattern 4 for CD21 (p = 0.305) and CD23 (p = 0.005), respectively. Distribution of pattern 5 was significantly different between grades 1 and 3 both for CD21 (p = 0.005) and CD23 (p < 0.001). Distribution of patterns 2 and 6 was not significantly different between grades 1 and 3 for CD21 and CD23. The values of cyclin A and Mib-1 were also significantly different between grades 1 and 3 (p < 0.001).
Conclusions
The observed patterns of FDCs lead us to believe that similar to reactive lymph node follicles, neoplastic follicles in FL, at least in early stages, have an organized structure. Hypothetically, with CD21, CD23, and cyclin A immunohistochemistry, the sequence of events in FL progression may be traced.
Keywords: CD21, CD23, Immunohistochemistry, Follicular lymphoma
Introduction
Immunohistochemical identification of FDC networks and demonstration of germinal center origin of tumor cells are key diagnostic features in follicular lymphoma (FL) [1]. Three-tiered histological grading of FL, based on quantification of neoplastic centrocytes and centroblasts in the neoplastic follicles, is hampered by intra- and interobserver variability [1, 2]. Some morphologically low-grade FLs have a high proliferative index and a more aggressive behavior [1]. Generally, neoplastic follicles in FL, in contrast to reactive germinal centers, have a lower proliferative index as measured by Ki-67 immunohistochemistry. However, with the increase of FL grade, the Ki-67 index also increases [3, 4]. Given that Ki-67 marks the cells throughout the cell cycle, determination of proliferation index in follicular lymphoma by this antibody may suffer certain interpretation issues due to the overlapping of signal. On the other hand, cyclin A, a member of the cyclin family, which binds to S phase CDk2 is more restrictive to the S phase of the cell cycle, hence staining fewer cells. Accordingly, it gives lesser overall values but a better discrimination also in terms of the distribution of proliferating cells [5]. Despite histological grading and determination of Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index (FLIPI), the evolution of FL is heterogeneous [1, 6–8]. Some patients present with indolent disease undergoing several relapses while others follow a more aggressive course [8].
Gene expression profile studies have shown that the prognosis of FL is also influenced by the type, number, and activation of cells in the microenvironment [6–8]. It is hypothesized that the number and distribution of non-malignant cells can in part serve as surrogate markers for clinically relevant gene expression signatures [6].
Follicular dendritic cells (FDCs) are a unique type of cell characterized by localization within lymphoid follicles, intricately entangled cytoplasmic processes, the ability to trap and retain immune complexes, and expression of molecules involved in the proliferation and differentiation of B cells [9]. There are a number of antibodies suited for formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue, by which FDCs in both reactive and neoplastic follicles are recognized. Some of the markers more frequently employed are antibodies to complement receptors such as CD21 and CD35, IgE FC receptors such as CD23, and IgG FC receptors such as CD32 [9]. Ultrastructural and immunohistochemical differences have been described in FDCs of primary and secondary follicles, illustrating the highly compartmentalized structure of lymph follicles [9]. In reactive lymph nodes, FDCs of both primary and secondary follicles are recognized by CD21 and CD35. FDCs in germinal center (GC) light zones (LZ) additionally upregulate CD23 and CD32 [9]. Up- and downregulation of CD23 by the FDCs seems to be related to centrocytic and centroblastic differentiation of the B cells, respectively. Hence, differences in FDC immunophenotype in different grades of FL may reflect some parallelism between reactive and neoplastic conditions in terms of FDC-B cell interaction and may be used as a valuable additional tool for grading FL.
Methods
A total of 60 paraffin blocks from patients with follicular lymphoma, 30 cases each of grade 1 and 3, were retrieved from our archive. Biopsy samples had been fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin and sectioned in 3–4micron sections. Immunohistochemical analysis was carried out for CD21, CD23, cyclin A, and Ki-67 (Table 1). Antigens were retrieved by placing the slides in a target retrieval solution for 45 min at 95–98 °C. The slides were incubated with the primary antibody for 30 min. The visualization was carried out with dextran polymer conjugated with peroxidase and secondary antibody (EnVision+, DAKO, Denmark, K534011) for 30 min. Interpretation of CD21 and CD23 stain was carried out by focusing on the follicular dendritic cell network in the germinal centers and the slender extensions of FDCs in the mantle zone. Staining of lymphocytes in the mantle and interfollicular zone was not taken into account. The intensity of staining was score-ranked from 1 through 5. During evaluation, six patterns of FDC distribution were distinguished (Fig. 1). Pattern 1 was complete staining of FDC networks throughout the neoplastic follicle. Pattern 2 was peripheral staining of the neoplastic follicle in a “crescentic” fashion, resembling light zone of the reactive germinal center. In pattern 3, the FDC network was broken throughout the follicle while the follicular outline was preserved. This pattern is similar to what is observed in the progressively transformed germinal center. The follicular outline was missing in the pattern 4. Pattern 5 consisted of complete lack of visualization of the FDC network. Pattern 6 highlighted FDC extensions in the mantle zone. All the patterns present in an individual lymph node were registered. SPSS was employed for statistical analysis.
Table 1.
Antibody | Clone | Source | Dilution | Pretreatment |
---|---|---|---|---|
CD21 | 1F8 | DAKO | 1:20 | pH 6.0 |
CD23 | SP23 | Labvision | 1:100 | PH9.0 |
Cyclin A | NCL-CYCLIN A | Novocastra | 1:50 | pH 9.0 |
Ki-67 | MIB-1 | DAKO | 1:100 | pH 9.0 |
Results
A total of 60 cases of nodal follicular lymphoma were analyzed by immunohistochemistry for expression of CD21 and CD23 by FDCs, and cyclin A, and Ki-67 by the tumor cells (Table 1). The study comprised thirty cases each of grade1 and 3 FL, respectively.
The intensity of stain for CD21 was not statistically significant in grade 1 and grade 3 FL (p = 0.340). In contrast, grade 3 FLs exhibited a significant decrease of CD23 expression by the FDCs (p < 0.001). We further analyzed the distribution of FDC patterns as marked by CD21 and CD23. Statistical analysis revealed that by CD21 stain, there was no significant difference in the distribution of pattern 1 in grades 1 and 3 (p = 0.098). In contrast, in grade 3, this pattern was significantly less observed by CD23 stain (p = 0.016). The same was observed for pattern 2 for CD21 (p = 0.940) and CD23 (p = 0.010) and pattern 4 for CD21 (p = 0.305) and CD23 (p = 0.005), respectively. Distribution of pattern 5 was significantly different between grades 1 and 3 both for CD21 (p = 0.005) and CD23 (p < 0.001). Distribution of patterns 2 and 6 was not significantly different between grades 1 and 3 for CD21 and CD23. The values of cyclin A and Mib-1 were also significantly different between grades 1 and 3 (p < 0.001).
Discussion
The majority of B cell lymphomas originate from the GC. The preferential localization of lymphoma cells in the GC suggests a unique relationship between tumor cells and their microenvironment [6, 9–19]. The generation and transformation of lymphomas occurs in close association with FDCs [18, 20]. FDCs contribute to lymphomagenesis by preventing apoptosis as well as by promoting the proliferation of transformed B cells. Lymphoma cells emerge by the acquisition of additional genetic changes or through adaptation to the protumorigenic environment provided by the signaling molecules of the FDCs [18, 20–22]. FDCs are not homogenous but are composed of different subpopulations, as defined by their surface markers. For survival, different types of lymphoma cells may require unique FDC subsets providing different surface molecules [6, 9–19]. Alternatively, distinct types of lymphomas may influence the differentiation of FDCs into different subpopulations [12, 18, 20].
The cellular microenvironment in FL is of biological and clinical importance [2, 6–8, 14, 15, 20, 21, 23–26]. It is hypothesized that the frequency and distribution of non-malignant cells in the microenvironment can in part serve as surrogate markers for the clinically relevant gene expression signatures. This issue has been the focus of numerous immunohistochemical studies which evaluated T cell subsets, macrophages, mast cells, microvessel density, and FDCs [6–8, 10, 12, 19, 21, 23–25, 27–29].
Ultrastructural differences have been described between FDCs in primary and secondary follicles, also within the light zone (LZ) and dark zone (DZ) of GC [9, 13, 17, 30, 31]. A series of articles describe the differences in CD21 and CD23 expression during GC development [9, 17, 20, 31–33]. Antibodies to the complement receptors, CD21 and CD35, recognize FDCs in both primary and secondary follicles whereas FDCs in GC LZ upregulate two Fc receptors namely, CD23 and CD32 [9, 31]. In fact, at the outset, we had tested the following antibodies: CD21, CD23, CD35, and CNA42 in terms of the following: (1) intensity of stain, (2) distribution of positive FDCs, and (3) percentage of positive follicles. CD21 was the antibody that gave the best stains and second to it was CD23. By using these two, we could cover the complement receptor and IgE FC receptor group of FDC antibodies. Additionally, we consider that the utility of CD23 is not only in FDC identification but also in lymphoma diagnosis and classification since it is a well-established marker in routine immunohistochemistry panels in lymphoma diagnosis and classification. Hence, we used the two former mentioned antibodies in the subsequent steps of our study. It is well known that centrocytes populate GC LZ and centroblasts populate GC DZ. When these facts are observed from follicular lymphoma standpoint, it may well be that in grade 1 FL, where neoplastic follicles are mainly composed of centrocytes, the FDC network resembles that of the primary follicle or GC LZ, hence expressing both CD21 and CD23. In contrast, in grade 3 FL, neoplastic follicles are mainly composed of centroblasts so the FDC network resembles that of the GC DZ, thereby expressing CD21 but losing CD23. This is supported by the findings of our study where we show that generally, as shown in the first two rows of Table 2, the distribution of CD21 was the same across categories of grade whereas this was not the case with CD23. Specifically, in FL grade 1, patterns 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6 were visualized by both CD21 and CD23 stain. In contrast, in FL grade 3, patterns 1, 2, and 4 of FDCs were lost by CD23. Distribution of pattern 5 was significantly different between grades 1 and 3 both for CD21 (p = 0.005) and CD23 (p < 0.001).
Table 2.
Asymptotic significances are displayed. The significance level is .05
Hence, we show that in a typical grade 1 FL, the FDCs have the phenotype of GC LZ, staining intensely and completely for CD21 and CD23. In contrast in grade 3, the FDCs have the phenotype of GC DZ, with downregulation of CD23 (Fig. 2). We also demonstrate that these findings correlate with cyclin A and Ki-67 values (Fig. 2). Cases with intense and complete staining with CD21 and CD23, typically grade 1 FLs, demonstrate low values of cyclin A and Ki-67. In contrast, grade 3 FLs with loss of CD23 demonstrate increasing values of cyclin A and Ki-67. Concerning the issue of why we left out the grade 2 cases, we should emphasize that by the exclusion of grade 2 cases, we intended to analyze the “two ends of the spectrum.” As it is the case that histological classification of FL is hampered by inter- and intraobserver variability, we considered that most overlap is, in fact, in grade 2 FL. Hence, by analyzing the grade 1 at one end, and grade 3 at the other, the phenotypic changes of FDC should be more conspicuous and would give us a better idea of the whole process. Additionally, we consider that by utilizing this system, a significant proportion of grade 2 FLs would subsequently reclassify into either grade 1 or grade 3 FL.
Ki-67 generally gave higher values due to the fact that it detects cells in any phase of the mitotic cycle [34]. In contrast, cyclin A detects cells in S phase of the cell cycle [35] thereby giving generally lower values but important insights in terms of the distribution of proliferating cells. In our study, we observed that in cases with intense CD21/CD23 stain, a typical pattern for FL grade 1, the cyclin A-positive cells were situated at the periphery of the neoplastic follicle. In contrast, with CD23 loss, the cyclin A-positive cells acquired a more haphazard distribution. This was not observed with Ki-67 stain.
In conclusion, we observed similarities in FDC immunophenotype between reactive GCs and neoplastic follicles in FL. FDCs in grade 1 FL share a similar immunophenotype with FDCs in the primary follicle and GC LZ. Additionally, FDCs in grade 3 FL share a similar immunophenotype with FDCs in GC DZ. These findings are complemented with the proliferation rate of tumor cells as measured by cyclin A and Ki-67. Furthermore, the observed patterns of FDCs in correlation to the distribution of cyclin A-positive cells lead us to believe that similar to reactive follicles, neoplastic follicles in FL, at least in early stages, have an organized structure. Hypothetically, with CD21, CD23, and cyclin A immunohistochemistry, the sequence of events in FL progression may be traced. Further studies with a larger number of cases are necessary to provide more insights. Rigorous criteria in histological grading have to be employed for the selection of new cases to be tested.
Acknowledgements
The authors wish to thank Prof. Dr.Ruke Shala Beqiraj for her valuable technical assistance during the preparation of this manuscript.
Authors’ contributions
FK designed and performed the study. FSS analyzed the data. AQ analyzed the data. ZV analyzed the data. FJ analyzed the data. SB analyzed the data. VR analyzed the data. ShS reviewed the study and the data. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Funding
No additional funding has been provided for the study.
Availability of data and materials
The data and material are at your disposition.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
The Ethical Committee of “University Clinical Center of Kosovo” approved the conduction of this research.
Consent for publication
The study material is paraffin blocks retrieved from our archive and is of pure morphological nature. No therapeutic or other interventions were undertaken in patients.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Swerdlow SH, Weltgesundheitsorganisation, International Agency for Research on Cancer, editors. WHO classification of tumours of haematopoietic and lymphoid tissues: [... reflects the views of a working group that convened for an Editorial and Consensus Conference at the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), Lyon, October 25 - 27, 2007]. 4. ed. Lyon: Internat. Agency for Research on Cancer; 2008. 439 p. (World Health Organization classification of tumours).
- 2.Martinez AE, Lin L, Dunphy CH. Grading of follicular lymphoma: comparison of routine histology with immunohistochemistry. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2007;131(7):1084–8. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17616995 [DOI] [PubMed]
- 3.Hashmi AA, Hussain ZF, Faridi N, Khurshid A. Distribution of Ki67 proliferative indices among WHO subtypes of non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma: association with other clinical parameters. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev APJCP. 2014;15(20):8759–8763. doi: 10.7314/apjcp.2014.15.20.8759. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Nasir A, Hegerova L, Shanley R, Bachanova V, Yohe SL. Clinical significance of low grade follicular lymphoma with high proliferative index. Blood. 2017;130(Suppl 1):4044–4044.
- 5.Cyclin A Antibody 100-401-151 from Rockland Immunochemicals, Inc. | Biocompare.com [Internet]. [cited 2019 Apr 30]. Available from: https://rockland-inc.com/store/Cell-Cycle-Protein-Antibodies-100-401-151-O4L_11743.aspx
- 6.Sander B, de JD, Rosenwald A, Xie W, Balagué O, Calaminici M, et al. The reliability of immunohistochemical analysis of the tumor microenvironment in follicular lymphoma: a validation study from the Lunenburg Lymphoma Biomarker Consortium. Haematologica. 2014;99(4):715–725. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2013.095257. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Luminari S, Cox MC, Montanini A, Federico M. Prognostic tools in follicular lymphomas. Expert Rev Hematol. 2009;2(5):549–562. doi: 10.1586/ehm.09.34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Solal-Céligny P, Cahu X, Cartron G. Follicular lymphoma prognostic factors in the modern era: what is clinically meaningful? Int J Hematol. 2010;92(2):246–254. doi: 10.1007/s12185-010-0674-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Allen CDC, Cyster JG. Follicular dendritic cell networks of primary follicles and germinal centers: phenotype and function. Semin Immunol. 2008;20(1):14–25. doi: 10.1016/j.smim.2007.12.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Wahlin BE, Aggarwal M, Montes-Moreno S, Gonzalez LF, Roncador G, Sanchez-Verde L, et al. A unifying microenvironment model in follicular lymphoma: outcome is predicted by programmed death-1--positive, regulatory, cytotoxic, and helper T cells and macrophages. Clin Cancer Res Off J Am Assoc Cancer Res. 2010;16(2):637–650. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-09-2487. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Petrasch S, Perez-Alvarez C, Schmitz J, Kosco M, Brittinger G. Antigenic phenotyping of human follicular dendritic cells isolated from nonmalignant and malignant lymphatic tissue. Eur J Immunol. 1990;20(5):1013–1018. doi: 10.1002/eji.1830200510. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Lee C-G, Das B, Lin TL, Grimes C, Zhang X, Lavezzi T, et al. A rare fraction of drug-resistant follicular lymphoma cancer stem cells interacts with follicular dendritic cells to maintain tumourigenic potential. Br J Haematol. 2012;158(1):79–90. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2012.09123.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Kosco-Vilbois MH. Are follicular dendritic cells really good for nothing? Nat Rev Immunol. 2003;3(9):764–769. doi: 10.1038/nri1179. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Wahlin BE, Sander B, Christensson B, Ostenstad B, Holte H, Brown PD, et al. Entourage: the immune microenvironment following follicular lymphoma. Blood Cancer J. 2012;2(1):e52. doi: 10.1038/bcj.2011.53. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Yagi K, Yamamoto K, Umeda S, Abe S, Suzuki S, Onishi I, et al. Expression of multidrug resistance 1 gene in B-cell lymphomas: association with follicular dendritic cells. Histopathology. 2013;62(3):414–420. doi: 10.1111/his.12035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Qi H, Egen JG, Huang AYC, Germain RN. Extrafollicular activation of lymph node B cells by antigen-bearing dendritic cells. Science. 2006;312(5780):1672–1676. doi: 10.1126/science.1125703. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Li L, Choi YS. Follicular dendritic cell-signaling molecules required for proliferation and differentiation of GC-B cells. Semin Immunol. 2002;14(4):259–266. doi: 10.1016/s1044-5323(02)00058-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Park C-S, Choi YS. How do follicular dendritic cells interact intimately with B cells in the germinal centre? Immunology. 2005;114(1):2–10. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2567.2004.02075.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Farinha P, Al-Tourah A, Gill K, Klasa R, Connors JM, Gascoyne RD. The architectural pattern of FOXP3-positive T cells in follicular lymphoma is an independent predictor of survival and histologic transformation. Blood. 2010;115(2):289–295. doi: 10.1182/blood-2009-07-235598. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Carbone A, Manconi R, Poletti A, Volpe R. Heterogeneous immunostaining patterns of follicular dendritic reticulum cells in human lymphoid tissue with selected antibodies reactive with different cell lineages. Hum Pathol. 1988;19(1):51–56. doi: 10.1016/s0046-8177(88)80315-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Smeltzer JP, Jones JM, Ziesmer SC, Grote DM, Xiu B, Ristow KM, et al. Pattern of CD14+ follicular dendritic cells and PD1+ T cells independently predicts time to transformation in follicular lymphoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2014;20(11):2862–2872. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-13-2367. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Matas-Céspedes A, Rodriguez V, Kalko SG, Vidal-Crespo A, Rosich L, Casserras T, et al. Disruption of follicular dendritic cells–follicular lymphoma cross-talk by the Pan-PI3K inhibitor BKM120 (Buparlisib) Clin Cancer Res. 2014;20(13):3458–3471. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-14-0154. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Younes SF, Beck AH, Lossos IS, Levy R, Warnke RA, Natkunam Y. Immunoarchitectural patterns in follicular lymphoma: efficacy of HGAL and LMO2 in the detection of the interfollicular and diffuse components. Am J Surg Pathol. 2010;34(9):1266–1276. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0b013e3181e9343d. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Shi Y, Li X. Immunohistochemical patterns of follicular dendritic cell meshwork and Ki-67 in small B-cell lymphomas. Zhonghua Bing Li Xue Za Zhi. 2013;42(4):222–226. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-5807.2013.04.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Cui W, Che L, Sato Y, Huang X, Takata K, Orita Y, et al. Nodal follicular lymphoma without complete follicular dendritic cell networks is related to localized clinical stage. Pathol Int. 2011;61(12):737–741. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1827.2011.02736.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Fujihara M. Study of CD21-positive FDC-like structures in MALT lymphoma: does it provide helpful information for histopathological diagnosis? Pathol Int. 2010;60(9):642–643. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1827.2010.02574.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Wahlin BE, Sundström C, Holte H, Hagberg H, Erlanson M, Nilsson-Ehle H, et al. T cells in tumors and blood predict outcome in follicular lymphoma treated with rituximab. Clin Cancer Res Off J Am Assoc Cancer Res. 2011;17(12):4136–4144. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-11-0264. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Alvaro T, Lejeune M, Salvadó M-T, Lopez C, Jaén J, Bosch R, et al. Immunohistochemical patterns of reactive microenvironment are associated with clinicobiologic behavior in follicular lymphoma patients. J Clin Oncol Off J Am Soc Clin Oncol. 2006;24(34):5350–5357. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.06.4766. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Carreras J, Lopez-Guillermo A, Roncador G, Villamor N, Colomo L, Martinez A, et al. High numbers of tumor-infiltrating programmed cell death 1-positive regulatory lymphocytes are associated with improved overall survival in follicular lymphoma. J Clin Oncol Off J Am Soc Clin Oncol. 2009;27(9):1470–1476. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.18.0513. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Rademakers LH. Dark and light zones of germinal centres of the human tonsil: an ultrastructural study with emphasis on heterogeneity of follicular dendritic cells. Cell Tissue Res. 1992;269(2):359–368. doi: 10.1007/BF00319629. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Jones D. Dismantling the germinal center: comparing the processes of transformation, regression, and fragmentation of the lymphoid follicle. Adv Anat Pathol. 2002;9(2):129–138. doi: 10.1097/00125480-200203000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Maeda K, Matsuda M, Suzuki H, Saitoh H. Immunohistochemical recognition of human follicular dendritic cells (FDCs) in routinely processed paraffin sections. J Histochem Cytochem. 2002;50(11):1475–1485. doi: 10.1177/002215540205001107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Yoshida K, van den Berg TK, Dijkstra CD. Two functionally different follicular dendritic cells in secondary lymphoid follicles of mouse spleen, as revealed by CR1/2 and FcR gamma II-mediated immune-complex trapping. Immunology. 1993;80(1):34–39. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Jonat W, Arnold N. Is the Ki-67 labelling index ready for clinical use? Ann Oncol. 2011;22(3):500–502. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdq732. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Lim S, Kaldis P. Cdks, cyclins and CKIs: roles beyond cell cycle regulation. Development. 2013;140(15):3079–3093. doi: 10.1242/dev.091744. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
The data and material are at your disposition.