Abstract
Objectives
This study evaluated the prevalence rate of vaso-occlusive crisis (VOC) episodes, rates of uncomplicated and complicated VOC episodes, and the primary reasons for emergency room (ER) visits and inpatient admissions for sickle cell disease (SCD) patients.
Methods
The Medicaid Analytic extracts database was used to identify adult SCD patients using claims from 01JUL2009-31DEC2012. The date of the first observed SCD claim was designated as the index date. Patients were required to have continuous medical and pharmacy benefits for ≥6 months baseline and ≥12 months follow-up period. Patient demographics, baseline clinical characteristics, the rate of uncomplicated and complicated VOC (VOC with concomitant SCD complications) episodes, and reasons for ER visits and inpatient stays were analyzed descriptively.
Results
A total of 8,521 patients were included in the analysis, with a median age of 30 years. The average follow-up period was 2.7 years. The rate of VOC episodes anytime in the follow-up was 3.31 in person-years. During the first-year follow-up period, an average of 2.79 VOC episodes were identified per SCD patients, with 1.06 VOC episodes treated in inpatient setting and 0.90 VOC episodes in ER without admission. A total of 76,154 VOC episodes were identified during the entire follow-up period for the overall SCD patients. Most of the VOC episodes (70.3% [n = 53,523]) were uncomplicated episodes, and 29.7% were complicated episodes. Using primary diagnosis claims only, the most frequent complications during the VOC episode were infectious diseases (25.9%), fever (21.8%), and pulmonary disorders (16.2%). Among ER and hospitalizations related to VOC or SCD complication, ~85.0% had VOCs as the primary reason for admission; 15.0% had SCD complications as the primary reason.
Conclusion
In summary, SCD and its related comorbidities and complications result in high acute health care utilization. In addition, VOC remains the primary reason for SCD patients’ ER visits and inpatient admissions.
Introduction
Sickle cell disease (SCD) is a life-threatening genetic disorder affects ~100,000 individuals in the United States, where it is one of the most common genetic blood disorders [1,2]. Damage to the red blood cells (RBCs) occurs due to polymerization of deoxygenated hemoglobin S (HbS) and these damaged cells have abnormal structures as well as expression of adhesion molecules. This results in hemolytic anemia and the blockade of small blood vessels, which lead to vaso-occlusion and end organ failure [3]. Importantly, multicell adhesion between RBCs, white blood cells, platelets, and endothelial cells result in painful vaso-occlusive crisis (VOC) [4–6].
The most common sequelae of SCD include VOC episodes, invasive infections, acute chest syndrome, strokes, and chronic pulmonary hypertension [7]. SCD causes recurrent VOC episodes as well as increases the risk of infections and other complications that often require emergency intervention [8]. VOC is a very important complication of SCD: the higher the number of VOCs experienced by SCD patients, the worse the patient’s quality of life [9,10]. Multicell adhesion is the driver of VOC, and treatment targeting this adhesion results in more VOC-free days [11].
Some previous studies have examined health care utilizations and the main causes of acute care for SCD patients. SCD has been associated with high utilization of medical care, such as ER visits and hospitalization, as observed in a study finding that as high as 53% of SCD patients who had ER visits subsequently required inpatient stays in hospitals or other treatment facilities [12]. Studies have shown that VOC is the main cause of most SCD health care utilization or medical contact, and high health care utilization among SCD patients remains prevalent due to poor acute pain management [13–15]. A study conducted with Florida Medicaid program data from 2001–2005 across all patients showed that during the 5-year study period, SCD patients incurred an average of 3.7 inpatient hospitalizations and 24.1 hospital days, with ~84% attributable to SCD-related diagnoses [16]. Other studies have found that higher health care utilization in adult SCD patients is associated with a higher risk for mortality, and acute SCD pain episodes are the most commonly observed cause of inpatient admission in SCD patients [17,18].
Although some studies have looked at the reason for admissions and ER visits in SCD patients and the rate of pain crisis episodes, very few studies have looked at the rate of SCD complications in different settings using real-world data. Therefore, using real-world data to shed light on the more current complications and reasons for health care utilization in adult SCD patients, this study descriptively evaluates the prevalence rate of VOC, the rate of complicated VOC (VOC with concomitant SCD complications) and uncomplicated VOC episodes, and the primary reasons for ER and inpatient admissions, with the most recent Medicaid database data available.
Materials and methods
Data sources
This was a retrospective, descriptive study using US Medicaid population data from 01JAN2009-31DEC2013. The Medicaid Analytic extracts (MAX) data system contains extensive individual-level information on the characteristics of Medicaid enrollees in all 50 states and the District of Columbia as well as the services used during a calendar year. Specifically, MAX consists of 1 personal summary file and 4 claims files that provide fee-for-service claims, managed care encounter data, and premium payments.
The study included fee-for-service patients from all available states and Managed Care enrollees who resided in 14 states that had relatively complete data (Arizona, California, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Minnesota, Nebraska, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Oregon, Tennessee, Texas, and Virginia). Service use among Managed Care enrollees is captured in encounter data (ie, data collected from patients when they receive services). Patients who had dual eligibility with Medicare were not included in this study due to the incomplete information in the MAX database.
Patient selection
Adult patients were selected if they had ≥1 diagnosed claim with SCD (ICD-9-CM code 282.41–282.42, 282.60–282.69) during the identification period (01JUL2009-31DEC2012). The date of the first observed SCD diagnosis claim was designated as the index date. Patients were required to have continuous health plan enrollment with medical and pharmacy benefits for ≥6 months pre-index date (baseline period) and ≥12 months post-index date (follow-up period). Patients were excluded if they were enrolled in a clinical trial during the study period (identified using ICD-9 codes V70.7).
Baseline measures
Patient socio-demographic and clinical characteristics were measured, including age, sex, race/ethnicity, geographical region, and Charlson comorbidity index score. In addition, the rate of inpatient stays and ER visits during the baseline period was assessed.
Outcome measures
The rate of VOC episodes in person-years during the entire follow-up period and the annual counts of VOC episodes (in total and by place of service in the first year) were assessed. VOC episodes were defined using the following ICD-9 codes (282.42, 282.62, 282.64, 282.69) from both primary and secondary claim positions. VOC claims without a 3-day gap were combined and considered 1 VOC episode. The number of VOC episodes in different settings were also calculated based on place of service using a hierarchical order: inpatient, ER, outpatient, office, and other.
Among the total VOC episodes identified in the follow-up period, the percentage of complicated and uncomplicated VOC episodes were examined [19]. A complicated VOC episode was defined as the presence of a diagnosis of other SCD complications (S1 Table) during the VOC episode, and uncomplicated VOC was defined as no occurrence of any other SCD complication during the VOC episode. The top 10 concomitant SCD complications (using both primary and secondary diagnosis claim positions) were identified.
In addition, the total number of ER and hospital visits related to VOC and SCD complications were examined during the 12-month follow-up period. The primary reasons for SCD-related ER and hospital visits were assessed based on the primary discharge diagnosis codes, including VOC (ICD-9-CM: 282.41, 282.42, 282.60–282.69) and SCD complications (S1 Table). Percentage of ER and inpatient visits associated with VOC or SCD complications were calculated.
Statistical methods
All variables were analyzed descriptively. Percentages and numbers were provided for dichotomous and polychotomous variables. Means and standard deviations were examined for continuous variables. For length of stay (LOS) of inpatient admission associated with VOC or SCD complication, median and interquartile range for LOS was also evaluated.
Results
Baseline characteristics
A total of 8,521 patients met the study selection criteria and were included in the analysis (Fig 1). The mean age of patients was 32.88 years (Standard deviation [SD] = 12.21), and the median age was 30 years. Patients were mainly from the Northeast region (44.6%). Most patients were female (67.3%). In addition, a large proportion of patients were African American (74%), and the remaining 26% patients were either white, Hispanic, other, or recorded as unknown. The mean Charlson comorbidity index score was 0.65, and the most frequent comorbid conditions during the baseline period were infectious diseases (19.7%), asthma (10.9%), fever (9.3%), neoplasms (benign and malignant) (7.2%), upper respiratory tract infections (6.6%), and constipation (5.9%).
During the baseline period, 53.6% (n = 4,563) of the SCD patients had ≥1 ER visit and 29.8% (n = 2,543) had ≥1 inpatient admission (Table 1).
Table 1. Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics.
Patient Characteristics | Sickle Cell patients (Age≥18) | |
---|---|---|
(N = 8,521) | ||
n/Mean | %/SD | |
Age (years) | 32.88 | 12.21 |
Age Group | ||
18–30 | 4,421 | 51.9% |
31–45 | 2,521 | 29.6% |
46–64 | 1,526 | 17.9% |
65+ | 53 | 0.6% |
Sex | ||
Male | 2,790 | 32.7% |
Female | 5,731 | 67.3% |
Race/Ethnicity | ||
White | 534 | 6.3% |
Black | 6,305 | 74.0% |
Hispanic | 862 | 10.1% |
Other | 245 | 2.9% |
Unknown | 575 | 6.7% |
Geographic Region | ||
Northeast | 3,800 | 44.6% |
North Central | 843 | 9.9% |
South | 2,266 | 26.6% |
West | 1,612 | 18.9% |
Charlson Comorbidity Index Score | 0.65 | 1.25 |
0 | 5,665 | 66.5% |
1 | 1,593 | 18.7% |
2–3 | 941 | 11.0% |
4+ | 322 | 3.8% |
Individual Comorbid Conditions* | ||
Neoplasms benign and malignant | 617 | 7.2% |
Asthma | 928 | 10.9% |
Upper respiratory tract infections | 565 | 6.6% |
Fever | 792 | 9.3% |
Infectious and parasitic diseases | 1,682 | 19.7% |
(Other unknown and unspecified cause of morbidity and mortality) | 2,289 | 26.9% |
Constipation | 501 | 5.9% |
Baseline All-cause Health Care Resource Utilization for all patients (6 months) | ||
LOS for inpatient stays (days) | 4.7 | 13.0 |
# of outpatient ER visits | 2.3 | 5.8 |
Any outpatient ER visit | 4,563 | 53.6% |
Any inpatient stay | 2,543 | 29.8% |
ER: Emergency room; LOS: Length of stay; n/#: Number; SCD: Sickle cell disease; SD: Standard deviation.
*only categories ≥5% were reported.
Follow-up results
Rate of pain crisis episodes
The mean/(SD) and median length of the follow-up periods were 972/(378) days and 981 days, respectively. During the entire follow-up, 53.4% of the 8,521 patients had ≥ 1 VOC episode, with a rate of 3.31 VOCs per person-year. During the first year of the follow-up period, 52.3% of the patients did not have any VOC episode, 14.7% had 1 VOC episode, 6.7% had 2 VOC episodes and remaining 26.3% had more than 2 VOC episodes (Fig 2). An average of 2.79 VOCs were identified per SCD patient during the first year of follow-up. Out of the total 2.79 VOCs identified per SCD patient, 1.06 VOC episodes were in inpatient setting, 0.90 VOC episodes were in an ER setting, 0.51 VOC episodes were in an outpatient setting, 0.24 VOC episodes were in an office setting, and 0.09 VOC episodes were in another setting such as pharmacy, school, correctional facilities, etc (Fig 3).
Rate of complicated and uncomplicated VOC episodes
During the entire follow-up period, 76,154 VOC episodes were identified for the 8,521 adult patients. Of the 76,154 VOC episodes observed, 22,631 (29.7%) were complicated VOCs and 53,523 (70.3%) were uncomplicated VOCs, respectively. Of the 22,631 complicated VOC episodes, the top associated concomitant SCD complications (according to primary diagnosis claims only) included infectious diseases (25.9%), fever (21.8%), pulmonary disorders (16.2%), cerebrovascular conditions (8.5%), and thrombosis/deep vein thrombosis (8.2%). While the top associated concomitant SCD complications (according to both primary and secondary diagnosis claim positions) were pulmonary disorders (76.1%), infectious diseases (55.1%), fever (45.4%), aseptic (avascular) bone necrosis (29.7%), and cerebrovascular conditions (20.5%) (Fig 4).
Primary reasons for SCD-related ER visits and hospitalization
Of the 8,521 adult SCD patients included in the study, a total of 3,493 ER visits related to VOC or SCD complications were identified during the 1-year follow-up period. Similarly, a total of 1,705 hospital visits related to VOC or SCD complications during the 1-year follow-up period were identified. Approximately 85.0% of SCD-related ER visits (n = 2,982) or hospitalizations (n = 1,449) had VOC as the primary reason for admission; 15.0% of the SCD-related ER visits (n = 511 or hospitalizations (n = 256) had SCD complications as the primary reason (Fig 5). Of the 256 hospitalizations with an SCD complication as the primary reason, the most common complications were infectious and parasitic diseases (35.5%) and cerebrovascular complications such as seizures (12.5%) and stroke (9.8%). The mean/(SD) and median/(interquartile) for LOS were 7/(7.4) days and 5/(5) days for VOC-related admissions; the mean/(SD) and median/(interquartile) for LOS were 9.7/(11.4) days and 6/(7) days for SCD-complication-related admissions.
Discussion
Using the most recent Medicaid data, this study evaluates the rate of SCD complications in different settings. In addition, the study evaluates the prevalence rate of VOC, the rate of complicated VOC (VOC with concomitant SCD complications) and uncomplicated VOC episodes, and the primary reasons for ER and inpatient admissions.
Over 76,000 VOC episodes were observed during the entire follow-up for the 8,521 adult SCD patients. The median age of the study population was 33 years, indicating that ~50% of the population was aged between 18–33 years. Studies have shown that young patients aged 18–33 years have had the highest mean annual ER visits compared with other age groups [14, 20–22], and more than 50% of our study population were in this age group. Further studies can be examined to evaluate the relationship between economic burden from VOC and age groups.
Studies have found that VOC, which commonly presents as a pain crisis, is the most common reason for hospitalization and ER visits in SCD patients [13,14, 23]. Another study showed that >90% of acute hospital admissions of SCD patients were because of severe and unpredictable pain crises [24]. Those findings accord with this study, which observed that VOCs were responsible for 85% of acute medical care for SCD patients, such as ER visits and hospitalization. Moreover, the mean LOS of inpatient visits for SCD or VOC-related admissions was 7 days and 9.7 days for SCD-complication-related admissions, respectively. Similarly, a previous study that examined management approaches for uncomplicated VOC observed an average LOS of 7.8 days for uncomplicated SCD admissions [25].
Studies have shown that VOC episodes in adult SCD patients are actually far more prevalent and severe than what is reported because VOCs are mostly managed at home; this underreporting most likely also indicates an underestimation of VOC prevalence and undertreatment [13]. In the case of this study, discrete VOC episodes within a 3-day gap were recorded as a single episode (eg, multiple ER admissions resulting in hospitalization within a 3-day period would still be calculated as an admission). Per patient we observed an average of 9 episodes requiring health care visits during the entire follow-up period of 2.7 years (ie, an average of about 3.3 VOCs per patient per year). In this study, VOC episodes were more commonly observed in acute settings, such as inpatient and ER, compared to other settings like outpatient.
Moreover, studies have observed infectious disease and pulmonary disease as common complications for SCD patients [13, 14]. Those findings accord with this study, which showed that infectious diseases, fever, and pulmonary disorders were the most common concomitant SCD complications observed during the follow-up period.
Limitations
Although claims data are valuable for the efficient and effective examination of health care outcomes, they are collected for payment and not research. Therefore, certain limitations are associated with their use. For instance, the presence of a diagnosis code on a medical claim does not indicate a positive presence of disease, as the diagnosis code may be incorrectly coded or included as rule-out criteria rather than actual disease.
In addition, this study was conducted on a population that may preclude generalizations to other populations. Specifically, the study setting was within the Medicaid population, which consists of people with disabilities, children of low-income families, pregnant women, parents of Medicaid-eligible children who meet certain low-income requirements, and low-income seniors. These populations are more likely than the general population to have unmet health care service needs.
Some data exclusions were also limitations. We excluded individuals with dual eligibility for both Medicaid and Medicare, for instance, since the data of these observations are not complete. Additionally, due to limited availability, the data of managed care plan patients only included 14 states, and study periods up to 31DEC2013 were the most recent data at the time of the study.
Conclusions
In a real-world setting, SCD and its related complications result in high acute health care utilization, and VOCs remain the primary reason for SCD patients’ ER visits and inpatient admissions. Our study shows that there is a great need for symptomatic and preventive management of VOC to the reduce burden of VOC-related healthcare utilizations. Recommendations that would alleviate this burden in SCD patients should focus on supportive management (which entails basic requirements for healthy living), preventive management (which includes the use of target therapeutics and vaccines to prevent infections), and curative management [26]. A combination of these measures will increase the likelihood of adequate treatment of VOC patients and help to prevent the complications and comorbidities associated with SCD.
Supporting information
Acknowledgments
Editorial support was provided by Michael Moriarty and Chris Haddlesey of STATinMED.
Data Availability
Data cannot be shared publicly because of a data licensing agreement with the US Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Data are available from the US Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services for researchers who meet the criteria for access to confidential data. For further information or to make a data request, visit https://www.resdac.org/.
Funding Statement
I have read the journal's policy and the authors of this manuscript have the following competing interests: This study was funded by Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation which is a commercial company. The funder provided support in the form of salaries for authors JP and MB. The funders also provided consultation fees to STATinMED Research, employer of LX, which is a paid consultant in connection with this study and the development of this manuscript. The funder provided support to NS in the form of research funding, consultant fees, and speaker’s fees. HY has nothing to disclose. However, the funder did not have any additional role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. There are no patents, products in development, or marketed products associated with this research to declare. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.
References
- 1.Brousseau DC, Panepinto JA, Nimmer M, Hoffmann RG. The number of people with sickle‐cell disease in the United States: national and state estimates. Am J Hematol. 2010;85(1):77–8. 10.1002/ajh.21570 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Hassell KL. Population estimates of sickle cell disease in the U.S. Am J Prev Med. 2010;38(4 Suppl):S512–21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Piel FB, Steinberg MH, Rees, DC. Sickle cell disease. N Engl J Med. 2017;376(16):1561–73. 10.1056/NEJMra1510865 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Rees DC, Williams TN, Gladwin MT. Sickle-cell disease. Lancet. 2010;376(9757):2018–31. 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61029-X [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Habara A, Steinberg MH. Minireview: genetic basis of heterogeneity and severity in sickle cell disease. Exp Biol Med (Maywood). 2016;241(7):689‐96. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Zhang D, Xu C, Manwani D, Frenette PS. Neutrophils, platelets, and inflammatory pathways at the nexus of sickle cell disease pathophysiology. Blood. 2016;127(7):801–9. 10.1182/blood-2015-09-618538 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Mehta SR, Afenyi-Annan A, Byrns PJ, Lottenberg R. Opportunities to improve outcomes in sickle cell disease. Am Fam Physician. 2006;74(2):303–10. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Mann‐Jiles V, Morris DL. Quality of life of adult patients with sickle cell disease. J Am Acad Nurse Pract. 2009;21(6):340–9. 10.1111/j.1745-7599.2009.00416.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.McClish DK, Penberthy LT, Bovbjerg VE, Roberts JD, Aisiku IP, Levenson JL, et al. Health related quality of life in sickle cell patients: the PiSCES project. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2005;3:50 10.1186/1477-7525-3-50 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Kater AP, Heijboer H, Peters M, Vogels T, Prins MH, Heymans HS. Quality of life in children with sickle cell disease in Amsterdam area. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 1999;43(41):2049–53. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Ballas SK, Gupta K, Adams-Graves P. Sickle cell pain: a critical reappraisal. Blood. 2012;120(18):3647–56. 10.1182/blood-2012-04-383430 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Epstein K, Yuen E, Riggio JM, Ballas SK, Moleski SM. Utilization of the office, hospital and emergency department for adult sickle cell patients: a five‐year study. J Natl Med Assoc. 2006;98(7):1109–13. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Smith WR, Penberthy LT, Bovbjerg VE, McClish DK, Roberts JD, Dahman B, et al. Daily assessment of pain in adults with sickle cell disease. Ann Intern Med. 2008;148(2):94–101. 10.7326/0003-4819-148-2-200801150-00004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Yale SH, Nagib N, Guthrie T. Approach to the vaso-occlusive crisis in adults with sickle cell disease. Am Fam Physician. 2000;61(5):1349–56. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Smith WR, Scherer M. Sickle-cell pain: advances in epidemiology and etiology. Hematolgy Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2010;2010:409–15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Kauf TL, Coates TD, Huazhi L, Mody-Patel N, Hartzema AG. The cost of health care for children and adults with sickle cell disease. Am J Hematol. 2009;84(6):323–7. 10.1002/ajh.21408 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Ballas SK. Sickle cell pain: progress in pain research and management, Vol. II Seattle: IASP Press; 1998. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Platt OS, Brambilla DJ, Rosse WF, Milner PF, Castro O, Steinberg MH, et al. Mortality in sickle cell disease. life expectancy and risk factors for early death. N Engl J Med. 1994;330(23):1639–44. 10.1056/NEJM199406093302303 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Tripathi A, Jerrell JM, Stallworth JR. Clinical complications in severe pediatric sickle cell disease and the impact of hydroxyurea. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2011;56(1):90–4. 10.1002/pbc.22822 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Brousseau DC, Owens PL, Mosso AL, Panepinto JA, Steiner CA. Acute care utilization and rehospitalizations for sickle cell disease. JAMA. 2010;303(13):1288–94. 10.1001/jama.2010.378 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Barriteau CM, McNaull MA. Sickle cell disease in the emergency department: complications and management. Clin Pediatr Emerg Med. 2018;19(2):103–9. [Google Scholar]
- 22.Paulukonis ST, Feuchtbaum LB, Coates TD, Neumayr LD, Treadwell MJ, Vichinsky EP, et al. Emergency department utilization by Californians with sickle cell disease, 2005–2014. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2017;64(6):e26390. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Platt OS, Thorington BD, Brambilla DJ, Milner PF, Rosse WF, Vichinsky E, et al. Pain in sickle cell disease. rates and risk factors. N Engl J Med. 1991;325(1):11–6. 10.1056/NEJM199107043250103 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Sins JWR, Mager DJ, Davis SCAT, Biemond BJ, Fijnvandraat K. Pharmacotherapeutical strategies in the prevention of acute, vaso-occlusive pain in sickle cell disease: a systematic review. Blood Adv. 2017;1(19):1598–616. 10.1182/bloodadvances.2017007211 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Benjamin LJ, Swinson GI, Nagel RL. Sickle cell anemia day hospital: an approach for the management of uncomplicated painful crises. Blood. 2000:95(4):1130–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Ballas SK. Sickle cell disease: Classification of clinical complications and approaches to preventive and therapeutic management. Clinical hemorheology and microcirculation. 2018; 68(2–3), 105–128. 10.3233/CH-189002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
Data cannot be shared publicly because of a data licensing agreement with the US Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Data are available from the US Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services for researchers who meet the criteria for access to confidential data. For further information or to make a data request, visit https://www.resdac.org/.