Abstract
Background
Orthopedic manifestations and sequelae of small pox disease are largely forgotten. Presening features in the modern era are not only the classical deformities but also includes precocious arthritis, pathological fractures and joint instability.
Objectives
To conduct a thorough and systematic review of the literature for all articles reporting osteomyelitis variolosa and its sequelae post eradication and to present an additional case as an illustration.
Study design
Systematic review and case report.
Method
ology: PubMed, EMBASE and Google Scholar databases were searched for relevant articles using different combinations of the keywords till 20th June 2017. All articles reporting cases of osteomyelitis variolosa following small pox eradication were included. Pearling of the bibliographies of selected articles was conducted to locate articles missed by the primary database search. Data from these reports were collected on pre-defined forms and the results were analysed.
Results
A total of 8 cases have been reported in the literature so far post-eradication of small pox and all cases are from India. These cases have predominant involvement of elbow followed by hands, feet and ankle. Characteristic clinical signs in the present era are secondary arthritis, pathological fractures, joint instability and some cases even have incidental presentation.
The diagnosis is further confirmed by plain radiographs which show pathognomonic features of this condition. Rate of missed/misdiagnosis is very high due to rarity of this condition. All cases in the published literature were managed conservatively except those presenting with pathological fracture.
Conclusions
The purpose of this study is to remind clinicians of an easily recognised sequelae of an eradicated disease and make them aware of its complications.
Keywords: Small pox, Osteomyelitis variolosa
1. Background
Smallpox was the first infectious disease to be eradicated1 but its consequences including osteoarticular manifestations and sequelae can occasionally be encountered in countries like India where disease was rampant in the 20th century. Musculoskeletal complications following smallpox have been reported especially in young children in the pre-eradication era. Osteomyelitis variolosa is the accepted terminology for the skeletal involvement which appears during the recovery period from the smallpox eruption.
The sequelae of osteomyelitis variolosa may raise a diagnostic challenge to the untrained eyes of the surgeon. Purpose of reporting this case is to recognize the characteristic features of osteomyelitis variolosa and its presentation in the present era, a condition very rarely encountered in clinical practice.
2. Methods
The PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses) checklist was used for key aspects of this systematic review wherever applicable.2 The PubMed, EMBASE and Google scholar databases were searched from 1980 (eradication of small pox) to 20th June 2017 using different combinations of keywords (Table 1). PEARLing of the references of full text articles included in the review was conducted to identify articles which were missed in the primary database search (see Table 2).
Table 1.
Database searched | Results |
---|---|
|
18 studies 1 Study |
|
38 studies |
|
24 studies |
Table 2.
2.1. Inclusion & exclusion criteria
We included all studies reporting osteomyelitis variolosa or musculoskeletal complications of small pox. Cases where the presentation was in the form of acute osteomyelitis variolosa and those predating 1980 were excluded. Cases of all age groups were included in the review. No language barrier was applied for the search.
2.2. Data collection & analysis
The search results were analysed by first observers independently by using the study title and abstract. In cases of ambiguity, inclusion was ascertained by analysing the entire article after obtaining the full-text and consulting the senior author (DN). Duplicates were excluded; reference manager software (Zotero® Standalone software, Fairfax, VA, USA) was used to ensure elimination of duplicity. Full-text was obtained for all studies included in the final analysis. All data from the studies selected for the systematic review was collected on pre-defined, data collection forms. The following data were collected - journal name and year of publication, country of origin, demographic features of the patients, duration at presentation, clinico-radiologic features and details of management. This data was analysed qualitatively and the results were summarised in a tabular fashion (Table 3).
Table 3.
Studies and number of cases | patients | Presentation | Bones affected |
---|---|---|---|
A Arora, A Agarwal, S Kumar (2008)3 | 2 | Pathological fracture, Secondary arthritis | Humerus, radius, ulna, ankle, feet |
Douraiswami Balaji (2011)4 | 1 | Secondary arthritis | Distal femur, patella, humerus, metacarpals, ankle. |
Nema et al. (2011)5 | 1 | Secondary arthritis | Distal Humerus, Metacarpals, metatarsals, phalynx, calcaneum |
Andrews et al. 20118 | 1 | Asymptomatic | Humerus, radius, Ulna, metacarpals |
Mugalur et al. (2015)6 | 1 | Secondary arthritis | Humerus, radius, Ulna, Metacarpals, ankle |
Singh PK 20129 | 1 | Pathological fracture | Humerus, radius, Ulna, Metacarpals |
Thomas J 20177 | 1 | Secondary arthritis | Humerus, radius, Ulna, Metacarpals, ankle |
Present study | 1 | Asymptomatic incidental finding | Humerus, radius, Ulna, |
3. Results
3.1. Literature search
Out of the initial 48 records identified by our search, 7 studies were identified which fitted the inclusion & exclusion criteria of the review. According to study design all studies are isolated case reports. Altogether 8 cases of osteomyelitis variolosa have been reported till date following eradication. A flowchart of all the studies included and excluded in the review has been given in Fig. 1. The results of these studies has been summarised in Table 3 (see Fig. 2).
3.2. Demographic features
All 8 cases have been reported from India. These cases have been reported middle age to elderly individuals of age range 40–70 years (mean age-46.5 years). Seven cases were males and one was female.
3.3. Clinical presentation
Mean age at presentation was 46.5 years (Range: 40–70 years) for the 8 cases which have specified details. Vast majority of cases (100%) reported have affected the elbows. Involvement in six cases pertain to the hands and five with involvement of foot and ankle.3, 4, 5, 6, 7 Elbow involvement was bilateral in all cases.
The presenting features are precocious arthritis or pathological fracture. Some patients are asymptomatic and are observed when the present for unrelated complaints.3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 All cases were diagnosed clinically with supplementary plain radiographs.
3.4. Management & complications
All cases were managed conservatively except those presenting with pathological fracture. Both cases with pathological fracture involved the distal shaft of the humerus. One was managed with square nailing while the other with plating with good results for both.3,9
4. Discussion
Small Pox is an infectious disease caused by either of two virus variants, Variola major and Variola minor of the genus Orthopoxvirus, the family Poxviridae and subfamily chordopoxvirinae. The term osteomyelitis variolosa refers to the osteo-articular affection of Variola major, only seen in cases arising in childhood and tends to affect predominantly the elbow joints among other joints.10,11 The clinical and radiological features of osteomyelits variolosa have been very well-described by Cockshott and MacGregor in their reports (10,11). The Manifestatations in the post eradication era are somewhat different with complaints of deformities, arthritis and instability presenting especially in middle age to elderly population. The first reference to such osteoarticular complications of small pox was by Bidder in 1873.12
During smallpox epidemics, 0.25–0.5% of the patients or 2–5% of affected children had osteoarticular manifestation,13 most commonly in the elbows, wrists, ankles, hands, and feet.10,11 Osteo-articular complications of variola infection manifest between first and fourth week of illness with gradual swelling around the joints, finally involving adjacent long bones. 80% of these involved the elbow followed by hands, wrists, ankles and feet.10,11 Ribs, spine and pelvis are relatively spared. Characteristic radiographic features of disease during evolving phase are bone destruction in metaphysic more clearly defined on epiphyseal side with epiphyseal destruction, physeal separation and extensive periosteal reaction often extending along the whole length of shaft of the bone.2, 3, 4
Viral invasion of bone is rare, with only the viruses of smallpox, vaccinia, and rubella known to invade bones and joints. Whether osteomyelitis variolosa is directly caused by the virus is controversial.14 Elementary bodies are present in fluid aspirated from the affected joints.15 As per available literature the infection involved the musculoskeletal system in the secondary viraemia stage. Though acute cases of osteomyelitis variolosa are not seen since the eradication of smallpox, the sequelae of the disease are still occasionally noticed in previously endemic areas.
The late changes are, as would be expected the presenting features in the modern era. These include ankylosis of the joints, malformation of the bones (frequently with an intact joint space), flail joints and ultimately osteoarthritis. Even if the disease was diagnosed early the osteoarticular manifestations of small pox were deemed destructive,unpreventable and untreatable.12 Sequalae of the disease have radiographic findings in the form of subluxated, flail, ankylosed, dislocated joints with precocious osteoarthritis. There is abnormal mobility at the ankles while movements at the elbows are restricted; the reason for this difference is not known.15 80% cases have symmetrical involvement. Dwarfism has also been reported (see Fig. 3, Fig. 4, Fig. 5).
The bones can be irregular, sclerosed or thickened with Deformity and irregularity of short tubular bones.
Elbow, the most frequent joint involved shows central cavitation of distal Humerus with enlarged and deformed condyles, thickening and enlargement of Olecranon and Radial head with eventual subluxation, dislocation or ankylosis of joint. There is absorption of central trochlea with elongation of both condyles around the elbows. Sclerosis around the elbow with enlargement of olecranon process of ulna and radial head has been reported.16
Analysis of post-eradication reports available on Osteomyelitis Variolosa show a predominant involvement of elbows followed by hands, feet and ankles.10,11 Of the 9 cases reported after eradication there is 100% involvement of elbow. The reason for predilection for the elbow is not known. It is hypothesised that high stresses in the joint predispose it to localization during viraemia.10,11
The differential diagnosis for this condition includes sequelae of pyogenic septic arthritis,16 congenital dysplasia (Achondroplasia),15 Salmonella Osteitis,11 pseudohypothyroidism,16 leprosy,17Caffey's disease,18 and perthes disease.19
Sequelae of pyogenic septic arthritis does not involve all 3 bones of elbow joint and spares the epiphysis and is rarely bilateral.16 Caffey's disease often affects the mandible, clavicle, ribs, scapula, which is different from osteomyelitis variolosa.18 Most of these cases can be ruled out through a proper detailed history and clinico-radiological co-relation.
Deformities of the hands and feet following dactylitis12 result in short stubby fingers and brachymetatarsalgia.5,6,8,9 There is deformity, instability and disorganization around the wrist and ankle joint caused by the disease process.3,4,6,7 Ankle involvement is further complicated by collapse of the talus.4
Arora et al.3 and Singh9 reported a distal humerus fracture around the elbow affected with osteomyelitis variolosa, which was managed operatively. Nema et al.5 also described a case report of a fracture around the involved ankle joint. The reason for this is the deformity, instability and disorganization around the joint predisposing it to abnormal stresses. Fracture union and functional outcome does not show any abnormality despite gross bony alteration.
Douraiswami Balaji4 described a case who presented with knee pain and had hypoplastic lateral condyle with involvement of bilateral elbows and ankles.
Previously reffered to as an uncomfortable interference with function rather than an illness in the present scenario such complications like precocious arthritis, pathological fracture and joint instability which should be appropriately managed.
5. Case illustration
A 56 year-old male child presented with open grade IIIb fracture of the distal femur. The patient also had bilateral elbow deformity. On physical examination he had residual facial stigmata of variola, There was flexion deformity of both elbow joints but the patient had good range of motion within the functional range (20–140° bilaterally) for elbow. X-ray of both elbow joints showed sclerosis of bones around elbow joint, enlargement of olecrenon process of ulna, and head of radius. The patient declined any treatment other than conservative management for his deformity. His compound fracture was managed by debridement, external fixator and later by definitive plating.
6. Conclusion
Deformities of osteomyelitis variolosa can be summed up as consisted of a bilateral, symmetrical osteomyelits with arthritis predominantly affecting the upper limb.
Cases of osteomyelitis variolosa can still be encountered in previous endemic areas like India. The purpose of this report is not to describe a new condition but to remind clinicians of an easily recognised complication of an eradicated disease. Radiologically despite the serious manifestations like deformed and dislocated joints and bones, good functionality of patient may be in striking contrast. Also in various case reports patient has sought clinician's opinion for other conditions like a pathological fracture rather than the preexisting condition per se.3,5
Footnotes
Supplementary data related to this article can be found at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcot.2018.08.005.
Appendix A. Supplementary data
The following is the supplementary data related to this article:
References
- 1.World Health Organization . Smallpox and its Eradication. World Health Organization; 1988. Epidemiology of smallpox; pp. 171–174. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Liberati A., Altman D.G., Tetzlaff J. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 Oct;62(10):e1–e34. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Arora A., Aggarwal A., Kumar S. Osteomyeleitis variolosa: a report of 2 cases. J Orthop Surg. 2008;16(3):355–358. doi: 10.1177/230949900801600318. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Balaji D. Osteomyelitis Variolosa: a case report. J Orthop Surg. 2011;19(1):120–122. doi: 10.1177/230949901101900128. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Nema S., Vyas G.S., Kukreja S. Sequelae of osteomyelitis variolosa: a case report. Rheumatol Int. 2012 Nov;32(11):3425–3427. doi: 10.1007/s00296-011-2194-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Mugalur A., Shahane S.M., Samant A., Pathak A.C., Reddy R. Excellent functionality despite clinico-radiological deformity in osteomyelitis variolosa - a case report [Internet]. [cited 2017 Aug 2] https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4484349/ Available from: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 7.Thomas J. Osteomyelitis variolosa. J Clin Rheumatol. 23(2):114. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 8.Andrews M.A., Jayan K.G. Osteomyelitis variolosa. Rheumatol Int. 2011 Sep;31(9):1231–1233. doi: 10.1007/s00296-009-1272-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Singh PK. reportOsteomyelitis Variolosa with Fracture: a Unique Case Report.
- 10.Cockshott P., MacGregor M. The natural history of osteomyelitis variolosa. J Facul Radiol. 1959;10:57–63. doi: 10.1016/s0368-2242(59)80062-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Cockshott P., MacGregor M. Osteomyelitis variolosa. Q J Med. 1958;27:369–387. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Davidson J.C., Bulawayo P.E. Osteomyelitis variolosa. J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 1963;45:687–693. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Middlemiss H. William Heinemann Medical; London: 1962. Tropical Radiology; pp. 11–13. [Google Scholar]
- 14.James C.D., Palmer P.E.S. Osteomyelitis variolosa. J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 1963;45(B):687–693. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Mohindra Y., Tuli S.M. Osteomyelitis variolosa stimulating achondroplasia. Indian J Pediatr. 1969;36:48–49. doi: 10.1007/BF02751861. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Gupta S.K., Srivastava T.P. Roentgen features of skeletal involvement in small pox. Australas Radiol. 1973;17:205–211. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1673.1973.tb01436.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Lentz M.W., Noyes F.R. Osseous deformity from osteomyelitis variolosa. A case report. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1979;143:155–157. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Palmer P.E., Reeder M.M. 2001st ed. Springer; 2001. The Imaging of Tropical Diseases: With Epidemiological, Pathological and Clinical Correlation. 597 p. [Google Scholar]
- 19.Brown Brwon. Osteomyelitis variolosa. J Am Med Assoc. 1923;81(17):1414–1415. [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.