Abstract
We report on improvement of sensitivity for molecular detection utilizing terahertz time domain spectroscopy. Based on confining and enhancing electromagnetic field with metallic nanoslot antennas, we additionally employ monolayer graphene sheet whose edge and hydrophobic surface nature lead to increase detecting performance. Terahertz transmittance in monolayer graphene/metallic nanoslot structure exhibits more unambiguous change after lactose molecules are attached, compared to that in metallic nanoslot structure without monolayer graphene. We attribute the prominent change to that more lactose molecules are guided inside/near the metal gap region due to edge and hydrophobic surface nature of monolayer graphene. This monolayer graphene/metallic nanoslot structure can be expanded in other organic or bio-molecular detection.
Subject terms: Imaging and sensing, Optical properties and devices, Metamaterials
Introduction
Many molecules which have intermolecular interaction exhibit resonant absorption in terahertz frequency regime. Because of millimeter wavelength of terahertz electromagnetic field, large-size pellet is required to study the light-matter interaction. Recently, there has been conducted to sensitive molecular sensing in terahertz frequency range such as explosive molecule, bio-molecule, and microorganism, utilizing large field enhancement and confinement of metallic nanostructures1–4. The usage of metallic nanostructure is a fascinating way to improve the interaction where the molecules with relevant strength of the light-matter interaction can be probed with low quantity, since the millimeter wave entirely funnels through the metal gap where the molecules exist1,5,6. Furthermore, designing metallic structure to match with resonant absorption of desired materials provides a platform for ultrasensitive detection of specific molecule1,3.
In this detecting process, one remaining issue to increase sensitivity is putting target molecules inside/near the metal gaps. Since the terahertz absorption/sensing is proportional to the number of molecule inside/near the metal gaps when the field enhancement of metallic gaps is identical by a fixed gap width, it is important to guide the molecules inside/near the gap. On the one hand, monolayer graphene (MLG) can promote molecular adsorption at its defective site which is relevant for functionalization with various materials from gases to bio-molecules7–17. One of the representative defective sites is MLG edge that acts as an effective adsorption agency. In addition to the active site for molecular adsorption, hydrophobic surface nature of MLG may provide higher probability to host the target molecules inside metal gap region because the hydrophobic surface prevents the solution from spreading away. Furthermore, the fact that MLG is compatible with metallic nanoslot antenna without any loss in terms of electric-field enhancement is favored to combine metallic nanoslot antenna and MLG to investigate light (terahertz wave)-matter (ultralow amount of molecules) interaction and develop related sensing devices.
In this work, we combine the two concepts i.e. electric-field enhancement and MLG to increase sensitivity of molecular detection. The MLG/metal gap structure results in synergy in the aspect of electric-field enhancement and increasing the number of molecule near the gap where electromagnetic waves are strongly enhanced and confined. We fabricate nanoslot antenna array conformed by MLG. The MLG/metal gap structure exhibits improved sensitivity for lactose molecules compared to nanoslot antenna without MLG. We attribute the result to the fact that the total number of lactose molecules increases near the gap due to edge structure and hydrophobic surface nature of MLG. Consequently, we elevate sensitivity (or detecting performance) combining the enhanced electric-field and effective attachment of lactose molecules near the enhanced field region, decreasing the detectable molecular density in solution.
Results and Discussion
Terahertz time-domain spectroscopy is a useful tool for detecting bio-molecules which have resonant absorption in the terahertz frequency regime. We perform the terahertz time-domain spectroscopy using an oscillator-based femtosecond Ti:sapphire laser system with 800 nm center wavelength, 80 MHz repetition rate, and 130 fs pulse width. The laser is divided into terahertz generation and probe beam. Single-cycle of terahertz pulse generated by biased photoconductive antenna with generation beam is guided and focused on samples by off-axis parabolic mirrors. Transmitted terahertz waves are detected through electro-optic sampling using 〈110〉-oriented 1 mm-thick ZnTe crystal with probe beam. We apply the transmission type of terahertz time-domain spectroscopy to detect lactose molecules as a prototypical bio-molecule which has intermolecular absorption in the terahertz frequency.
Figure 1(a) shows time traces of terahertz electric-field transmitted through bare sapphire (black) and droplet of lactose solution (total amount of 2 mg) over an area of 3 mm × 3 mm on bare sapphire substrate (red). As shown in the frequency domain (Fig. 1(b)), the lactose molecules have weak and strong resonant absorptions at 0.53 THz and 1.35 THz, respectively, which are consistent with previous works1,18. Here, since our purpose is the sensitive molecular detection, we focus on the frequency of 0.53 THz that has smaller absorption coefficient.
To obtain ultrasensitive molecular detection using MLG, we constructed two different samples which are arrays of nanoslot antenna with and without MLG. First of all, two 100 nm-thick copper (Cu) films on sapphire substrates are prepared. After then, one of them remains bare Cu film (Fig. 2(a)) and the other is covered by MLG grown by chemical vapor deposition (CVD) method (Fig. 2(b)). We have synthesized large-area MLG on Cu foil (Alfa aesar 13382) at 1070 °C under atmospheric pressure19. Subsequently, we transferred MLG on to desired substrate by bubbling transfer method with a 0.1 M NaOH solution20. A representative optical image of MLG on SiO2 (285 nm)/Si substrate is shown in top of Fig. 2(e). Bottom (lower panel) of Fig. 2(e) exhibits Raman spectrum of MLG sheet using an excitation laser with 532 nm wavelength. Typical G (~1587 cm−1) and 2D (~2679 cm−1) peaks are observed, where the intensity ratio (I2D/IG > 1) and single Lorentzian shape of 2D peak confirm the number of layers21. We also observed D (~1350 cm−1) peak of which low intensity indicates high quality of MLG sheet. Subsequently, arrays of rectangular hole with a length (l) of 150 μm and a width (w) of 130 nm were fabricated by focused ion beam (FIB). The resonance frequency of slot antennas is matched to the weak absorption frequency of lactose molecules (0.53 THz). Figure 2(c,d) indicate the final structures of metallic nanoslot antennas without and with MLG, respectively.
Figure 3(a) represents terahertz time traces transmitted through nanoslot antennas before (black) and after (blue) dropping small amount of lactose (0.04 μg) solution, showing the distinguishable transmission reduction due to intermolecular absorption of lactose molecules. The corresponding transmission spectra represent reduction of the maximum value of transmittance from 0.0149 to 0.0134 (−ΔT/T0,max ~ 0.10) (Fig. 3(c)). This has been explained with the absorption enhancement caused by the strong electric-field enhancement in metal nanogap structures1,22–26. In addition to the intensity reduction, the resonant peak position moves toward lower frequency (from 0.538 THz to 0.525 THz (−Δf/f0,res ~ 0.024)) due to the increasing of the refractive index inside/near the gap by the molecules3,27,28. However, it is still required that the sensitivity of terahertz molecular detection is improved for ultra-small number of molecules.
In case of MLG-covered nanoslot antennas, the reduction of terahertz signal is more prominently observed as shown in Fig. 3(b). It is worth to note that the transmission spectrum of MLG-covered nanoslot antennas before molecular dropping (gray line in Fig. 3(c)) has the almost same resonance strength and frequency with that of bare nanoslot antennas (black line in Fig. 3(c)). This implies that the MLG-covered metal structure provides same electric-field enhancement (~630 at the resonance) which determines the detection sensitivity. Note that the field enhancement is extracted by square root of transmittance divided by gap-coverage ratio. Despite the same field enhancement, the MLG-covered nanoslot antenna provides around two times larger transmission reduction (−ΔT/T0,max ~ 0.18) and red-shift (−Δf/f0,res ~ 0.059). This indicates that MLG covering the metal surface of nanoslot antennas boosts the sensitivity of molecular detection with increasing the effective refractive index inside/near the gap caused by more contribution of molecules. From the data, it can be estimated that total number of molecules inside the gap for MLG-covered nanoslot antennas is around two times larger than that for bare nanoslot antennas. We attribute this improved sensitivity to more contribution of molecules caused by MLG which has properties (defective site at edge and hydrophobicity), while higher sensitivity of molecular detection had been achieved by stronger field enhancement and desirable metal structures in other previous works1–3.
It is well known that the edge is more active than basal of MLG sheet. In the chemical point of view, the reactivity is determined by electron distribution depending on atomic structure. Compared to intact aromatic structure in basal of MLG, the edge of MLG consists of radicals which possess active electrons. As a result, edge-preferred chemical reactivity can occur15, which agrees with the fact that organic molecules favor to attach with defective site of MLG16. Therefore, the portion of attached lactose molecules in MLG-covered nanoslot antennas is assisted by the MLG edge which is active site for organic-molecular adsorption with the increase of sensitivity.
Other effect for increasing detection molecule can be attributed to the hydrophobic nature of MLG. MLG in ambient has been expected to have a surface with hydrophobic nature even though the MLG shows the transition effect from hydrophobicity to hydrophilicity under specific condition such as gate voltage and laser irradiation29–33. Schematic diagrams in Fig. 4(a,b) show that the shape effect of lactose solution droplet on hydrophobic (Cu with MLG) and hydrophilic (Cu without MLG) substrates with same total amount of lactose solution, respectively. The surface nature affects contact angle which determines height and area of droplet. Compared to the hydrophilic case, hydrophobic case has larger contact angle of droplet that increases height and decreases area of droplet on the surface. With same lactose concentration and total amount of solution, the height of droplet can be scaled as amount of lactose molecule per unit area. Therefore, more lactose molecules can be present inside/near nanoslot antenna with MLG due to the hydrophobic surface nature. The hydrophobic surface also has a benefit to reduce inevitable coffee-ring effect which suppresses sensitivity due to undesired molecular deposition along the perimeter of droplet. Smaller area of droplet can reduce adsorption-loss originated from the coffee-ring effect out of nanoslot antenna.
Even though quantitative analysis for the adsorption process in microscopic point of view is additionally required, the origins addressed above seem to be in agreement with our observation. Since the solution drop-casting was conducted by micro-pipet in ambient condition, we measured the contact angle of the droplet under the same conditions as drop-casting. The MLG has hydrophobic surface nature with about 88 degree of contact angle, while Cu has hydrophilic properties that decrease the contact angle of droplet about 84 degree (Fig. 4(c)). Larger contact angle represents smaller area and higher solution droplet, increasing the possibility of molecular adsorption near and inside the slot antenna. This is consistent with our terahertz transmission results in Fig. 3 that molecular absorption increases in nanoslot antenna with MLG. We note that our sensing approach can be improved by additional chemical treatment such as fluorine which has larger contact angle29.
Conclusion
In summary, we have investigated lactose molecular sensing using metal nanogap-based terahertz time-domain spectroscopy. We have endeavored to improve the sensitivity with increasing light-matter interaction. The strategies have been achieved by metallic nanoslot antenna array covered by MLG, where we expect two distinct advantages such as (i) enhancement and confinement of electromagnetic waves and (ii) more adsorption of lactose molecules to the nanoslot antenna. Employing MLG conformal to the metallic nanoslot antenna not only maintains the electric-field enhancement but also increases amount of lactose molecules inside/near the gap. The latter can be achieved by adsorption favor of organic molecules on MLG edge and positioning larger number of molecules using hydrophobic surface nature of MLG sheet. We expect that our hybrid graphene-metal nanogap structure opens up increasing sensing probability and can be applied for highly sensitive sensor based on bio- and chemical-solution.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the Incheon National University Research Grant in 20170447 and the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (NRF-2018R1D1A1B07049573).
Author Contributions
The experimental concept was conceived by S.J.H. and Y.-M.B., G.C. and S.J.H. fabricated the samples and G.C. performed the experiments. G.C. and Y.-M.B. analyzed the experimental data. This manuscript was written by G.C., S.J.H. and Y.-M.B. All authors discussed the results and commented on the manuscript.
Competing Interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Geunchang Choi, Sung Ju Hong and Young-Mi Bahk contributed equally.
Change history
12/11/2019
An amendment to this paper has been published and can be accessed via a link at the top of the paper.
Contributor Information
Geunchang Choi, Email: gchoi@skku.edu.
Sung Ju Hong, Email: sjhong@skku.edu.
Young-Mi Bahk, Email: ymb@inu.ac.kr.
References
- 1.Park H-R, et al. Colossal absorption of molecules inside single terahertz nanoantennas. Nano Lett. 2013;13:1782–1786. doi: 10.1021/nl400374z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Park SJ, et al. Detection of microorganisms using terahertz metamaterials. Sci. Rep. 2014;4:4988. doi: 10.1038/srep04988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Lee D-K, et al. Highly sensitive and selective sugar detection by terahertz nano-antennas. Sci. Rep. 2015;5:15459. doi: 10.1038/srep15459. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Ryu Y-S, et al. Ultrasensitive terahertz sensing of gold nanoparticles inside nano slot antennas. Opt. Express. 2017;25:30591–30597. doi: 10.1364/OE.25.030591. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Seo MA, et al. Terahertz field enhancement by a metallic nano slit operating beyond the skin-depth limit. Nature Photon. 2009;3:152. doi: 10.1038/nphoton.2009.22. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Ahn KJ, Bahk Y-M, Kim D-S, Kyoung J, Rotermund F. Ultrasensitive molecular absorption detection using metal slot antenna arrays. Opt. Express. 2015;23:19047–19055. doi: 10.1364/OE.23.019047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Pliego JR, Resende SM, Humeres E. Chemisorption of SO2 on graphite surface: a theoretical ab initio and ideal lattice gas model study. Chem. Phys. 2005;314:127–133. doi: 10.1016/j.chemphys.2005.01.022. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Jiang D-E, Sumpter BG, Dai S. How do aryl groups attach to a graphene sheet? J. Phys. Chem. B. 2006;110:23628–23632. doi: 10.1021/jp065980+. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Xu Y-J, Zhang Y-F, Li J-Q. The interaction of X2 (X = F, Cl, and Br) with active sites of graphite. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2006;418:413–417. doi: 10.1016/j.cplett.2005.11.027. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Xuan Y, et al. Atomic-layer-deposited nanostructures for graphene-based nanoelectronics. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2008;92:013101. doi: 10.1063/1.2828338. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Sun Z, Kohama S-I, Zhang Z, Lomeda JR, Tour JM. Soluble graphene through edge-selective functionalization. Nano Research. 2010;3:117–125. doi: 10.1007/s12274-010-1016-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Kim SN, et al. Preferential binding of peptides to graphene edges and planes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011;133:14480–14483. doi: 10.1021/ja2042832. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Cao Y, Houk KN. Computational assessment of 1,3-dipolar cycloadditions to graphene. J. Mater. Chem. 2011;21:1503–1508. doi: 10.1039/C0JM02422H. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Xie G, et al. Graphene edge lithography. Nano Lett. 2012;12:4642–4646. doi: 10.1021/nl301936r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Bellunato A, Arjmandi Tash H, Cesa Y, Schneider GF. Chemistry at the edge of graphene. Chem. Phys. Chem. 2016;17:785–801. doi: 10.1002/cphc.201500926. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Bueno RA, et al. Highly selective covalent organic functionalization of epitaxial graphene. Nature Commun. 2017;8:15306. doi: 10.1038/ncomms15306. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Tang H, et al. Wrinkle- and edge-adsorption of aromatic compounds on graphene oxide as revealed by atomic force microscopy, molecular dynamics simulation, and density functional theory. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2018;52:7689–7697. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.8b00585. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Brown ER, Bjarnason JE, Fedor AM, Korter TM. On the strong and narrow absorption signature in lactose at 0.53 THz. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2007;90:061908. doi: 10.1063/1.2437107. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Li X, et al. Large-area synthesis of high-quality and uniform graphene films on copper foils. Science. 2009;324:1312–1314. doi: 10.1126/science.1171245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Gao L, et al. Repeated growth and bubbling transfer of graphene with millimetre-size single-crystal grains using platinum. Nature Commun. 2012;3:699. doi: 10.1038/ncomms1702. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Ferrari AC, et al. Raman spectrum of graphene and graphene layers. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2006;97:187401. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.187401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Seo M, et al. Active terahertz nanoantennas based on VO2 phase transition. Nano Lett. 2010;10:2064–2068. doi: 10.1021/nl1002153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Choi G, et al. Terahertz nanoprobing of semiconductor surface dynamics. Nano Lett. 2017;17:6397–6401. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.7b03289. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Choi G, et al. Enhanced terahertz shielding of MXenes with nano-metamaterials. Adv. Optical Mater. 2018;6:1701076. doi: 10.1002/adom.201701076. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Jeong J, et al. Anomalous extinction in index-matched terahertz nanogaps. Nanophotonics. 2017;7:347. doi: 10.1515/nanoph-2017-0058. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Choi G, Kang T, Seo M, Kim D-S, Bahk Y-M. Enhanced surface carrier response by field overlapping in metal nanopatterned semiconductor. ACS photon. 2018;5:4739–4744. doi: 10.1021/acsphotonics.8b00724. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Kang JH, Choe J-H, Kim DS, Park QH. Substrate effect on aperture resonances in a thin metal film. Opt. Express. 2009;17:15652–15658. doi: 10.1364/OE.17.015652. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Park HR, et al. Resonance behavior of single ultrathin slot antennas on finite dielectric substrates in terahertz regime. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2010;96:211109. doi: 10.1063/1.3437091. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Hong G, et al. On the mechanism of hydrophilicity of graphene. Nano Lett. 2016;16:4447–4453. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b01594. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Xu Z, et al. Reversible hydrophobic to hydrophilic transition in graphene via water splitting induced by UV irradiation. Sci. Rep. 2014;4:6450. doi: 10.1038/srep06450. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Shin YJ, et al. Surface-energy engineering of graphene. Langmuir. 2010;26:3798–3802. doi: 10.1021/la100231u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Kim K-S, et al. Chemical vapor deposition-grown graphene: the thinnest solid lubricant. ACS nano. 2011;5:5107–5114. doi: 10.1021/nn2011865. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Rafiee J, et al. Wetting transparency of graphene. Nature Mater. 2012;11:217. doi: 10.1038/nmat3228. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]