Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2019 Jul;20(7):e326–e332. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000001983

Severe Sepsis in Pediatric Liver Transplant Patients: The Emergence of Multidrug- Resistant Organisms

Alicia M Alcamo 1,2, Lauren J Alessi 1,2, S Noona Vehovic 1,2, Neha Bansal 3, Geoffrey J Bond 4, Joseph A Carcillo 1,2, Michael Green 2, Marian G Michaels 2, Rajesh K Aneja 1,2
PMCID: PMC6612583  NIHMSID: NIHMS1527047  PMID: 31094887

Abstract

Objective:

To describe characteristics of liver transplant patients with severe sepsis in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU)

Design:

Retrospective descriptive analysis

Setting:

Tertiary children’s hospital PICU

Patients:

Liver transplant recipients admitted Jan 2010 to Jul 2016 for pediatric severe sepsis

Interventions:

None

Measurements and Main Results:

Between Jan 2010 – Jul 2016, 173 liver transplants were performed, and 36 of these patients (21%) were admitted with severe sepsis (54 episodes total). Median age at admission was 2 y [1–6.5 y], 47.2% were male. Bacterial infections were the most common (77.8%), followed by culture negative (12.9%) and viral infections (7.4%). Fungal infections accounted for only 1.9%. Median time from transplant for viral and culture negative infections was 18 d [8.25–39.75 d] and 25 d [9–41 d], while 54.5 d [17–131.25 d] for bacterial infections. Bloodstream and intra-abdominal were the most common bacterial sites (45% and 22.5%, respectively). Multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) accounted for 47.6% of bacterial sepsis. Vancomycin resistant enterococcus and extended spectrum beta-lactamase producers were the most frequently identified MDROs. Patients with MDRO sepsis demonstrated higher admission PELOD scores (P=0.043) and were noted to have an odds ratio of 3.8 and 3.6 for mechanical ventilation and MODS, respectively (P=0.047 and P=0.044). Overall mortality was 5.5% (n=2 patients), with both deaths occurring in MDRO episodes.

Conclusions:

We report that MDROs are increasingly being identified as causative pathogens for sepsis in pediatric liver transplant recipients and are associated with significantly higher odds for mechanical ventilation and higher organ failure. The emergence of MDRO infections in pediatric liver transplant patients has implications for patient outcomes, antibiotic stewardship and infection prevention strategies.

Keywords: pediatric severe sepsis, pediatric liver transplantation, multidrug-resistant organisms

Introduction

The Sepsis Prevalence, Outcomes and Therapies (SPROUT) study, a prospective cross-sectional study of approximately 7000 children in 26 countries, reported a severe sepsis prevalence rate of 8.2% and a mortality of 25%. Similar to other studies, children with comorbid conditions were noted to have a higher mortality than previously healthy children, e.g., children with solid organ or stem cell transplant had a mortality of 48.2%1. Based on data retrieved from the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network/Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (OPTN/SRTR), approximately 600 pediatric liver transplants are performed annually, with the overall 5-year patient survival being 88%. Of note, infection was the leading cause of death followed by cardio/cerebrovascular complications in children with deceased donor transplant recipients2. Thus, this cohort of immunosuppressed patients faces an increased risk of infection by common pathogens, as well as, opportunistic infections caused by less virulent microorganisms that are harmless in an immunocompetent host35.

Several factors predispose pediatric liver transplant recipients to a higher risk for colonization and infection with multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs). These include frequent and prolonged hospitalizations, multiple rounds of antibiotics, and impairment of the immune system6. Recent data suggests that almost 25% of adult patients who are readmitted within 1 year following an MDRO infection had an MDRO isolated during the readmission7. Furthermore, the manifestations of sepsis in the immunosuppressed adult patient have been reported to be different with a slightly higher incidence of thrombocytopenia and organ failure, in contrast to non-transplant recipients8. Since there are important developmental differences between children and adults that can significantly impact the pathophysiology and outcome, we need to be cautious about extrapolating the results of adult studies to children. Therefore, it is imperative we understand if similar nuances exist in septic children who have previously received a liver transplant.

Since its inception in 1981, the pediatric liver transplantation program at UPMC Children’s Hospital of Pittsburgh (CHP) has become a leading center for technical variant allografts and living-donor liver transplantation, reporting survival rates above the national average (1-year survival, 98% vs 95%)2. Our expertise and relatively high volume in the field of pediatric organ transplantation has enabled us to perform this retrospective study. In this study, we aim to perform a descriptive analysis of pediatric liver transplant patients admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) with severe sepsis.

Methods

This was an IRB approved retrospective chart review of all pediatric liver transplant recipients between January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2015. CHP is a 293-bed tertiary hospital that has performed more pediatric transplants than any other center in the United States. All episodes of severe sepsis requiring PICU admission after transplant were identified between January 1, 2010 and July 31, 2016. This study timeframe allowed for a six-month follow-up period for any patient who received their transplantation at the end of 2015. Using the electronic medical record, demographic data were obtained, as well as the time from transplant, mortality, degree of critical illness, and location and etiology of infection. After a training session for uniformity in data collection, three reviewers (AMA, LJA, SNV) abstracted the data using a standardized data collection form. If there was any uncertainty about classification of a clinical episode, the information was independently reviewed by three separate individuals, who were not involved with the initial data extraction, and the episode was classified per the majority opinion.

Bacterial infections were identified based on positive cultures from sites of infection (respiratory aspirates, blood, peritoneal fluid, urine, or would cultures). Viral infections were identified with polymerase chain reaction testing for common respiratory tract viral pathogens, as well as, Epstein-Barr virus, cytomegalovirus, and adenovirus. Fungal cultures, as well as, Aspergillus antigen (galactomannan) testing were used to identify fungal infection. A multidrug-resistant organism (MDRO) was defined per the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines as an organism resistant to one or more classes of antimicrobials. MDROs such as vancomycin resistant enterococcus (VRE), methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), and extended spectrum beta-lactamases (ESBLs) have been identified by the CDC to deserve special attention in healthcare9.

Bloodstream and urinary tract infections were classified as positive blood and urine cultures, respectively. Urinary cultures were considered positive if greater than 50,000 colony forming units of a single organism was identified in a specimen obtained via sterile catheterization. Urinalysis at the time of culture was also evaluated for the presence of pyuria (leukocyte esterase, nitrites, and/or white blood cells) or bacteria (organisms on gram stain)10. Diagnosis of a respiratory tract infection was based on clinical signs and examination, worsening chest radiograph, and/or the need for oxygen supplementation or ventilatory support (or increased ventilatory support in a ventilator-dependent patient or patient already intubated post-operatively)11. Wound infections were denoted by positive wound cultures with consistent clinical signs and examination. Intra-abdominal infections (such as peritonitis or cholangitis) were based on clinical signs and symptoms, as well as, positive cultures. The classification of culture negative was provided to patients without an identifiable source of infection by cultures or physical examination, but whom had clinical signs of severe sepsis.

Severe sepsis was defined based on the criteria set by the International Pediatric Sepsis Consensus Conference. For episodes classified as severe sepsis, patients were identified to meet systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) criteria in the setting of presumed or confirmed infection with either cardiovascular dysfunction, respiratory distress syndrome, or organ dysfunction of two or more systems. SIRS was determined by the presence of at least two of the four criteria: 1) hypothermia or fever, 2) age-appropriate tachycardia or bradycardia, 3) age-appropriate tachypnea or need for ventilator support, or 4) leukopenia or leukocytosis for age. Patients were identified to have septic shock if their presentation was consistent with severe sepsis and had evidence of cardiovascular dysfunction12. Multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS) was defined as dysfunction of two or more organ systems in the setting of severe sepsis13,14.

Factors to assess for degree of clinical illness included vasoactive requirement, mechanical ventilation, use of hydrocortisone, and presence of multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS). Illness of severity was assessed using the pediatric logistic organ dysfunction (PELOD) score, which were calculated retrospectively using available chart data. Technical challenges and post-operative complications often lead to recurrent operative interventions and are a risk factor for development of sepsis1517. Therefore, we evaluated all obtained abdominal imaging (ultrasound, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, or cholangiogram) for findings of hepatic artery thrombosis (HAT) or new biliary complications.

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

Descriptive statistics performed for demographic data, infection etiology and site, and degree of clinical illness. Categorical variables were described using frequencies and percentages, while median and interquartile ranges (IQRs) were used to describe continuous variables. Fisher’s exact test was used to evaluate the risk for MODS and mortality in patients who had an identified MDRO infection compared to those who did not have an identified MDRO infection. Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used to compare PICU and hospital length of stay. Statistical significance was defined as a P-value ≤0.05. Statistical analysis performed using RStudio (Boston, MA).

Results

There were 173 liver transplants performed at CHP during the study period (average 28.8 liver transplants per year). Thirty-six patients (21%) were admitted to the PICU for a total of 54 severe sepsis episodes. There were 13 patients who had more than one episode of severe sepsis (9 patients with two and 4 patients with more than two episodes). Majority of patients received a deceased donor liver transplant (66.7%, n=24 patients). Primary indications for transplant are shown in Table 1. The median age for the septic patients was 2 y [1–6.5 y], and 47.2% were male. Time from transplant to sepsis for all episodes was 41 d [21.25–113 d]. Seventeen episodes (31.5%) in 16 patients were noted in the initial admission for transplant within a median of 8 days [4–13 d]. Overall morality was 5.5% in the cohort of septic pediatric liver transplant patients (n=2 patients).

Table 1.

Patient Demographics and Characteristics

Characteristic Patients with Severe Sepsis (n=36)
Age at time of admission (median, IQR)* 2 y [1–6.5 y]
Gender (n, % male) 17 (47.2%)
Reason for Transplant (n, %)
 Acute Liver Failure 2 (5.6%)
 Biliary Atresia 8 (22.2%)
 Inborn Error of Metabolism/Metabolic 7 (19.4%)
 Inherited/Intrinsic Liver Disease 11 (30.6%)
 Malignancy 5 (13.9%)
 Secondary Liver Disease 3 (8.3%)
Donor Status (n, %)
 Living 12 (33.3%)
 Deceased 24 (66.7%)
Time from transplant (median, IQR)* 41 d [12.25–113 d]

IQR=interquartile range;

*

total of 54 admissions

Etiology and site of infections for severe sepsis episodes shown in Table 2. Bacterial infections were the most commonly identified etiology for severe sepsis episodes (n=42 episodes; 27 patients). There were two episodes with simultaneous fungal co-infection where both the fungal and bacterial organisms were cultured either from the bloodstream only or in addition to the peritoneal fluid. One of these polymicrobial episodes also had detection of a respiratory virus in addition to the bacterial and fungal isolates. Overall bloodstream infections accounted for 45% of these occurrences (n=18 episodes; 15 patients). Twelve episodes had multiple sites identified (28.6%), of which the majority included bloodstream involvement (n=9 episodes). The viral infections identified were respiratory in origin, and there were no concurrent Epstein-Barr virus or cytomegalovirus infections in this cohort. There was one isolated fungal infection diagnosed from a respiratory fungal culture.

Table 2.

Etiology and Site of Severe Sepsis Episodes

Type of Infection All Episodes (total n = 54)
(n, %)
MDRO Bacterial Episodes (total n = 20)
(n, %)
Non-MDRO Bacterial Episodes (total n = 22)
(n, %)
Time from Transplant*, median [IQR]
Any Bacterial Component 42 (77.8%) 20 22 54.5 d [17–131.25 d]
Bacterial 40 (74.1%) 19 21
 Bloodstream (n, %) 18 (45%) 7 (36.8%) 11 (52.4%)
 Urinary (n, %) 1 (2.5%) 1 (5.3%) --
 Respiratory (n, %) 1 (2.5%) 1 (5.3%) --
 Wound (n, %) 1 (2.5%) -- 1 (4.8%)
 Intra-abdominal (n, %) 9 (22.5 %) 2 (10.5%) 7 (33.3%)
 Multiple sites (n, %) 10 (25%) 8 (42.1%) 2 (9.5%)
Polymicrobial 2 (3.7%) 1 1
 Multiple sites (n, %) 2 (100%) 1 (100%) 1 (100%)††
Viral 4 (7.4%) -- -- 18 d [8.25–39.75 d]
Fungal 1 (1.9%) -- -- 444 d
Culture Negative 7 (12.9%) -- -- 25 d [9–41 d]

IQR=interquartile range;

*

for all sepsis episodes;

bacterial and fungal co-isolates;

††

bacterial, fungal and viral co-isolates;

respiratory site of infection(s);

reflective of one fungal-only episode

A noteworthy finding was the presence of MDROs as the infecting organism in 47.6% of bacterial infections (n=20 episodes; 15 patients). Site of MDRO isolates are shown in Table 2. MDRO infections were more likely to involve multiple sites (n=9 episodes). Majority of these multi-site infections included bloodstream involvement (n=6 episodes). In comparison, there were more intra-abdominal and less multi-site infections identified for non-MDRO bacterial episodes. Bacterial, viral and culture negative infections occurred 54.5 d [17–131.25 d], 18 d [8.25–39.75 d] and 25 d [9–41 d] from transplant, respectively. The identified MDROs are shown in Table 3. Interestingly, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) was isolated in only one patient as being the causative organism.

Table 3.

Identified MDROs as Causative Agents

Organism % of MDRO episodes (n=20)
Vancomycin Resistant Enterococcus (VRE) 45% (n=9)
ESBL producers (E. coli or Klebsiella) 25% (n=5)
Klebsiella pneumonia carbapenemases (KPCs) 5% (n=1)
Stenotrophomonas maltophilia 5% (n= 1)
Burkholderia cepacia 5% (n=1)
Acinetobacter baumanii 5% (n=1)
More than 1 MDRO 10% (n=2)*
*

one episode includes identification of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA)

Initial empiric antibiotic choices were either piperacillin/tazobactam monotherapy or vancomycin and piperacillin/tazobactam combination therapy in over half of the episodes. This empiric therapy was appropriate in 52.4% of episodes, and if therapy needed to be modified, the length of delay to appropriate antimicrobial coverage was 2 d [0.5–4 d]. Such delay for appropriate antimicrobial coverage was more commonly observed in MDRO septic episodes, as compared to non-MDRO episodes (15 vs 5 episodes).

There were no identified occurrences of graft loss secondary to sepsis. Abdominal imaging was obtained in 42 episodes (77.8%). Five instances of HAT occurred within 8 d [3–10 d] after transplantation and only one was associated with an MDRO infection. In comparison, three patients were re-admitted to hospital with HAT occurring 24 d [20.5–109.5 d] after transplantation, all of which were associated with an MDRO septic episode. There were 10 new biliary complications (18.5%) that occurred 20.5 d [11.8–156 d] after transplantation. One third of the biliary complications occurred in the setting of an MDRO sepsis episode. Half of the biliary complications occurred concurrently with a diagnosis of HAT. In only one episode was it necessary to place a biliary drain for further management.

The level of support required for MDRO sepsis compared to remaining septic episodes is shown in Table 4. Significantly more MDRO septic episodes required mechanical ventilation and hydrocortisone therapy. No difference was noted in terms of vasoactive or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support. Patient with MDRO sepsis had significantly higher admission-level PELOD scores as compared to the remaining episodes (11 [8.75–17.25] vs 9 [6.25–11]; P=0.043). MODS was significantly more prevalent in MDRO sepsis resulting in longer PICU and hospital length of stay (Table 5). Mortality was noted exclusively in the MDRO sepsis cohort (n=2 patients).

Table 4.

Measures for Degree of Critical Illness

Level of Support All Episodes (total n=54) MDRO Episodes (n=20) Remaining Episodes (n=34)
(%, n) (%, n) (%, n) OR
MV 50% (n=27) 70% (n=14) 38.2% (n=13) 3.7 (CI 1.01–14.9), P=0.047*
Vasoactive Support 35.2% (n=19) 45% (n=9) 29.4% (n=10) 1.94 (CI 0.53–7.18), P=0.376
HCT 61.1% (n=33) 75% (n=15) 52.9% (n=18) 2.6 (CI 0.7–11.4), P=0.046*
ECMO 5.6% (n=3) 10% (n=2) 2.9% (n=1) 3.57 (CI 0.17–222.4), P=0.551

MV=mechanical ventilation, HCT=hydrocortisone, ECMO=extracorporeal membrane oxygenation

Table 5.

Clinical Outcome Measures

Outcome MDRO Episodes (n=20 episodes, 15 patients) Remaining Episodes (n=34 episodes, 21 patients) P
MODS (%, n) 60% (n=12 episodes) 29.4% (n=10 episodes) 3.5 (CI 0.98–13.5), P=0.04*
Hospital LOS (median, IQR) 47.5 d [38.5–55.3 d] 28 d [11.3–47.5 d] P =0.04*
PICU LOS (median, IQR) 15.5 d [2.8–37.5 d] 5.5 d [3–16 d] P =0.15

MODS=multiple organ dysfunction syndrome, LOS=length of stay

Discussion

Infection is known to be a significant cause for morbidity and mortality in the pediatric solid organ transplant patient, both in the early and late post-transplant period3,5,1820. To our knowledge, this is one of the first studies to provide insights into the epidemiology and outcomes of severe sepsis in pediatric liver transplant recipients, specifically as it relates to ICU admission and MDROs. Three main findings from our study include: 1) MDROs have emerged as a significant cause of severe sepsis for the pediatric liver transplant patient. 2) Higher acuity in pediatric septic transplant patients (i.e., need for mechanical ventilation and evidence of multi-system organ failure) associated with MDRO severe sepsis episodes. 3) In contrast to historical data, median time for bacterial infections was 54.5 days after transplant. Each of these findings merit further discussion, as below.

The most noteworthy finding of this study was the identification of MDRO as a significant cause of severe sepsis episodes in the pediatric liver transplant recipient. Select pediatric studies have noted the emergence of MDRO infections in pediatric oncology, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, cystic fibrosis, and neonatal patients, but there are no such studies in pediatric liver transplant recipients2124. Studies in adult transplant recipients have noted history of prior hospitalizations, previous invasive temporary or permanent lines and multiple prior antibiotic exposures as factors determined to be associated with increased risk for MDRO colonization2527. We noted that only 40% of the patients with an MDRO septic episode had a previous MDRO-identified infection or documented colonization. Part of the challenge was that identification of such factors was limited given that many patients were referred to our hospital for their transplantation and thus, the majority of their pre- or peri-transplant care was at the referring institution. Similar to the adult studies, our results indicate vancomycin resistant enterococcus and extended spectrum beta-lactamase producing organisms are the most common2527. Further studies examining the prevalence of MDRO colonization need to be performed as this has implications for treatment of these children and their outcomes.

The association of MDRO septic episodes with outcomes was an important finding in this study. Patients with MDRO infections had more significant organ dysfunction and significantly longer hospital stays, as well as a trend toward longer PICU lengths of stay. These findings are similar to others studies which have shown an association of increased mortality, need for hospital readmission, longer lengths of stay, and increased hospital costs due to MDRO infections28,29. In our study, median delay to appropriate antibiotic coverage was 2 days and more prevalent in patients with an identified MDRO, which may be a potential explanation for the observed worsened outcomes in that subset of patients. Early recognition of sepsis and prompt treatment of the underlying cause is a hallmark of the contemporary care delivered in pediatric emergency rooms and hospitals. The 2017 American College of Critical Care Medicine septic shock guidelines recommend administering empiric antibiotics within the first hour of treatment30. Kumar et al have shown that there is an increase in mortality rate for every hour delay of effective antibiotic administration after the onset of septic shock in adults31. Similarly in pediatric sepsis patients, Weiss et al have shown that a three-hour delay for appropriate antibiotics is associated with an increased mortality and prolonged organ failure32. Given the potential for MDRO septic episodes in this population, thoughtful empiric antibiotic management should be guided by each patient’s infectious history, as well as, local bacterial epidemiology. Furthermore, these findings may have important implications for hospital quality improvement efforts, infection prevention, and antibiotic stewardship programs to decrease antibiotic usage and MDRO prevalence.

The identified viruses in this study were all common respiratory viral infections and not opportunistic or latent viral reactivations. These viral infections were also determined as early post-transplant sepsis etiologies, occurring a median of 18 days following transplantation. We suspect that improvement in laboratory techniques and technology have allowed for more accurate and faster detection of viral infections, making it more feasible to detect such etiologies for severe sepsis episodes3335. Historically, it has been shown that infections following transplantation occur in a temporal and predictable pattern, with bacterial infections occurring within the first 30-days after the transplant36,37. In our study, the median time for bacterial infections was approximately 55 days, suggesting that bacterial infections can occur even after the 30-day period following transplantation. Several factors can explain these findings and include increasing patient complexity, complicated post-operative surgical courses, and in-dwelling medical devices. However, in this retrospective review, we were unable to verify these factors as it was difficult to obtain supporting data. Another striking finding was the association of HAT with severe sepsis episodes, suggesting a potential link to surgical complexity and complications, similar to previous reports38,39. Almost all patients in our study had received imaging to assess for potential surgical complications, a practice that should be “standard of care” for any septic liver transplant recipient, especially in the early transplant period.

There are several limitations to this study. As this is a retrospective, single-center study, it is difficult to draw definitive conclusions regarding the epidemiology and risk factors of sepsis within this specific cohort. Particularly, there are limitations to exploring the landscape of antibiotic exposure for each patient to facilitate further understanding of the relationship of MDRO severe sepsis and prior antibiotic administration. Also, the small sample size limited our ability to perform multi-variate analyses to further assess MDRO severe sepsis, therefore our conclusions are suggestive of associations and need further evaluation in a multi-center setting. It is important to state that as a referral hospital for pediatric liver transplantation, our institution performs many complex and high-risk transplantations, therefore it is plausible that our patients may have different risk factors for pediatric severe sepsis following transplant compared to other centers, thus potentially limiting generalizability of our data. Lastly, the follow-up time after transplant varied for each patient evaluated, hence we may have missed some late sepsis episodes for patients who received their transplant at the end of the inclusion criteria. Despite these limitations, we feel that this unique dataset does allow inferences to be drawn, specifically highlighting the necessity for evaluation of antimicrobial practices in severe sepsis episodes for this population, as well as reexamining antibiotic stewardship and infection prevention practices given the emergence of MDROs.

Conclusion

Infection is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in the pediatric liver transplant recipient, specifically in the early transplant period. Due consideration of MDROs as a causative agent should be made when these patients present with sepsis. Thus, initial antibiotic choices may differ for this population based on the patient’s history and institutional antimicrobial resistant patterns. Larger prospective studies are needed to assess post-transplant severe sepsis outcomes to identify modifiable risk factors and to develop specific treatment guidelines for this unique patient cohort.

Conflicts of Interest and Source of Funding:

Funding support from NIH T32-HD40686 (AMA) and NIH R01-GM109618 (JAC).

Copyright form disclosure: Dr. Alcamo’s institution received funding from National Institutes of Health (NIH) T32 HD040686. Drs. Alcamo, Carcillo, and Aneja received support for article research from the NIH. Dr. Carcillo’s institution received funding from the NIH/National Institute of General Medical Sciences. Dr. Michaels’ institution received funding from Pfizer (unrelated study grant), and she received funding as an AST board member (travel and room for meetings, no honoraria) and from NIAID (honoraria and travel and room for DSMB meetings). Dr. Aneja received royalties from UptoDate. The remaining authors have disclosed that they do not have any potential conflicts of interest.

References

  • 1.Weiss SL, Fitzgerald JC, Pappachan J, et al. Global epidemiology of pediatric severe sepsis: the sepsis prevalence, outcomes, and therapies study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. May 2015;191(10):1147–1157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Kim WR, Lake JR, Smith JM, et al. OPTN/SRTR 2016 Annual Data Report: Liver. Am J Transplant. January 2018;18 Suppl 1:172–253. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Fridell JA, Jain A, Reyes J, et al. Causes of mortality beyond 1 year after primary pediatric liver transplant under tacrolimus. Transplantation. December 27 2002;74(12):1721–1724. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Sudan DL, Shaw BW, Langnas AN. Causes of late mortality in pediatric liver transplant recipients. Transplant Proc. 1997 Feb-Mar 1997;29(1–2):430–431. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Sudan DL, Shaw BW, Langnas AN. Causes of late mortality in pediatric liver transplant recipients. Ann Surg. February 1998;227(2):289–295. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Leber B, Spindelboeck W, Stadlbauer V. Infectious complications of acute and chronic liver disease. Semin Respir Crit Care Med. February 2012;33(1):80–95. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Burnham JP, Kwon JH, Olsen MA, Babcock HM, Kollef MH. Readmissions With Multidrug-Resistant Infection in Patients With Prior Multidrug Resistant Infection. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. January 2018;39(1):12–19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Kalil AC, Syed A, Rupp ME, et al. Is bacteremic sepsis associated with higher mortality in transplant recipients than in nontransplant patients? A matched case-control propensity-adjusted study. Clin Infect Dis. January 15 2015;60(2):216–222. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Siegel JD, Rhinehart E, Jackson M, Chiarello L, (HICPAC) HICPAC. Management of MDRO’s in Healthcare Settings. 2006.
  • 10.Roberts KB. Urinary tract infection: clinical practice guideline for the diagnosis and management of the initial UTI in febrile infants and children 2 to 24 months. Pediatrics. September 2011;128(3):595–610. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Bradley JS, Byington CL, Shah SS, et al. The management of community-acquired pneumonia in infants and children older than 3 months of age: clinical practice guidelines by the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society and the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis. October 2011;53(7):e25–76. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Goldstein B, Giroir B, Randolph A, Sepsis ICCoP. International pediatric sepsis consensus conference: definitions for sepsis and organ dysfunction in pediatrics. Pediatr Crit Care Med. January 2005;6(1):2–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Proulx F, Fayon M, Farrell CA, Lacroix J, Gauthier M. Epidemiology of sepsis and multiple organ dysfunction syndrome in children. Chest. April 1996;109(4):1033–1037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Proulx F, Joyal JS, Mariscalco MM, Leteurtre S, Leclerc F, Lacroix J. The pediatric multiple organ dysfunction syndrome. Pediatr Crit Care Med. January 2009;10(1):12–22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Bekker J, Ploem S, de Jong KP. Early hepatic artery thrombosis after liver transplantation: a systematic review of the incidence, outcome and risk factors. Am J Transplant. April 2009;9(4):746–757. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Unal B, Gonultas F, Aydin C, Otan E, Kayaalp C, Yilmaz S. Hepatic artery thrombosis-related risk factors after living donor liver transplantation: single-center experience from Turkey. Transplant Proc. April 2013;45(3):974–977. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Pastacaldi S, Teixeira R, Montalto P, Rolles K, Burroughs AK. Hepatic artery thrombosis after orthotopic liver transplantation: a review of nonsurgical causes. Liver Transpl. February 2001;7(2):75–81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Ashkenazi-Hoffnung L, Mozer-Glassberg Y, Bilavsky E, Yassin R, Shamir R, Amir J. Children post liver transplantation hospitalized with fever are at a high risk for bacterial infections. Transpl Infect Dis. June 2016;18(3):333–340. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Dreyzin A, Lunz J, Venkat V, et al. Long-term outcomes and predictors in pediatric liver retransplantation. Pediatr Transplant. December 2015;19(8):866–874. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Rhee KW, Oh SH, Kim KM, et al. Early bloodstream infection after pediatric living donor living transplantation. Transplant Proc. April 2012;44(3):794–796. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Tsai MH, Chu SM, Hsu JF, et al. Risk factors and outcomes for multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteremia in the NICU. Pediatrics. February 2014;133(2):e322–329. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Costa Pde O, Atta EH, Silva AR. Infection with multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacteria in a pediatric oncology intensive care unit: risk factors and outcomes. J Pediatr (Rio J). Sep-Oct 2015;91(5):435–441. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Haeusler GM, Mechinaud F, Daley AJ, et al. Antibiotic-resistant Gram-negative bacteremia in pediatric oncology patients--risk factors and outcomes. Pediatr Infect Dis J. July 2013;32(7):723–726. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Raidt L, Idelevich EA, Dubbers A, et al. Increased Prevalence and Resistance of Important Pathogens Recovered from Respiratory Specimens of Cystic Fibrosis Patients During a Decade. Pediatr Infect Dis J. July 2015;34(7):700–705. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Zhong L, Men TY, Li H, et al. Multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacterial infections after liver transplantation - spectrum and risk factors. J Infect. March 2012;64(3):299–310. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Santoro-Lopes G, de Gouvêa EF. Multidrug-resistant bacterial infections after liver transplantation: an ever-growing challenge. World J Gastroenterol. May 2014;20(20):6201–6210. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Hand J, Patel G. Multidrug-resistant organisms in liver transplant: Mitigating risk and managing infections. Liver Transpl. 08 2016;22(8):1143–1153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Barrasa-Villar JI, Aibar-Remon C, Prieto-Andres P, Mareca-Donate R, Moliner-Lahoz J. Impact on Morbidity, Mortality, and Length of Stay of Hospital-Acquired Infections by Resistant Microorganisms. Clin Infect Dis. August 15 2017;65(4):644–652. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Mauldin PD, Salgado CD, Hansen IS, Durup DT, Bosso JA. Attributable hospital cost and length of stay associated with health care-associated infections caused by antibiotic-resistant gram-negative bacteria. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. January 2010;54(1):109–115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Davis AL, Carcillo JA, Aneja RK, et al. American College of Critical Care Medicine Clinical Practice Parameters for Hemodynamic Support of Pediatric and Neonatal Septic Shock. Crit Care Med. June 2017;45(6):1061–1093. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Kumar A, Roberts D, Wood KE, et al. Duration of hypotension before initiation of effective antimicrobial therapy is the critical determinant of survival in human septic shock. Crit Care Med. June 2006;34(6):1589–1596. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Weiss SL, Fitzgerald JC, Balamuth F, et al. Delayed antimicrobial therapy increases mortality and organ dysfunction duration in pediatric sepsis. Crit Care Med. November 2014;42(11):2409–2417. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Sanghavi SK, Bullotta A, Husain S, Rinaldo CR. Clinical evaluation of multiplex real-time PCR panels for rapid detection of respiratory viral infections. J Med Virol. January 2012;84(1):162–169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Hodinka RL. Point: is the era of viral culture over in the clinical microbiology laboratory? J Clin Microbiol. January 2013;51(1):2–4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Mengelle C, Mansuy JM, Pierre A, et al. The use of a multiplex real-time PCR assay for diagnosing acute respiratory viral infections in children attending an emergency unit. J Clin Virol. November 2014;61(3):411–417. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Allen U, Green M. Prevention and treatment of infectious complications after solid organ transplantation in children. Pediatr Clin North Am. April 2010;57(2):459–479, table of contents. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Keough WL, Michaels MG. Infectious complications in pediatric solid organ transplantation. Pediatr Clin North Am. December 2003;50(6):1451–1469, x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Tzakis AG, Gordon RD, Shaw BW Jr., Iwatsuki S, Starzl TE. Clinical presentation of hepatic artery thrombosis after liver transplantation in the cyclosporine era. Transplantation. December 1985;40(6):667–671. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Kelly DA, Bucuvalas JC, Alonso EM, et al. Long-term medical management of the pediatric patient after liver transplantation: 2013 practice guideline by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases and the American Society of Transplantation. Liver Transpl. August 2013;19(8):798–825. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES