Skip to main content
NCBI home page
ZooKeys logoLink to ZooKeys
. 2019 Jul 1;858:109–126. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.858.34363

Description of a new species of Music frogs (Anura, Ranidae, Nidirana) from Mt Dayao, southern China

Zhi-Tong Lyu 1, Yun-Ming Mo 2, Han Wan 1, Yu-Long Li 1, Hong Pang 1,✉, Ying-Yong Wang 1,✉
PMCID: PMC6614172  PMID: 31312093

Abstract Abstract

A new species of Music frogs, Nidiranayaoicasp. nov. is described based on a series of adult male specimens collected from Mt Dayao, Guangxi, southern China, providing valuable new information on the phylogeny, bioacoustics, and biogeography of related species within the genus Nidirana. The new species forms the sister taxon to N.daunchina from western China and together the sister taxon to N.chapaensis from northern Vietnam. Nidiranayaoicasp. nov. can be distinguished from all known congeners by a significant genetic divergence in the mitochondrial 16S and CO1 genes, the advertisement call containing 1–3 rapidly repeated regular notes, and the combination of morphological characteristics including a medium-sized body with SVL 40.4–45.9 mm in adult males; lateroventral grooves on every digit, not meeting at the tip of disk; tibio-tarsal articulation reaching the nostril; the presence of a pair of subgular vocal sacs in males; and one single developed nuptial pad on dorsal surface of first finger in males.

Keywords: bioacoustic, Guangxi, mitochondrial DNA, morphology, Nidiranayaoica sp. nov.

Introduction

The taxonomic treatment of the Music frog genus Nidirana Dubois, 1992 was controversial for a long time (Dubois 1987, 1992; Chen et al. 2005; Frost et al. 2006; Fei et al. 2009, 2010; Chuaynkern et al. 2010). The recent contribution to the phylogeny of genus Nidirana reconsidered it as a distinct genus, on the basis of comprehensive evidence of morphology, molecular phylogeny, bioacoustics, and biogeography (Lyu et al. 2017). Eight Music frog species were recognized from subtropical eastern and southeastern Asia (Lyu et al. 2017; Frost 2019): N.okinavana (Boettger, 1895) from Yaeyama of southern Ryukyu, and eastern Taiwan; N.adenopleura (Boulenger, 1909) from Taiwan and southeastern mainland China; N.nankunensis Lyu, Zeng, Wang, Lin, Liu & Wang, 2017 from Mt Nankun of Guangdong and N.hainanensis (Fei, Ye, & Jiang, 2007) from Mt Diaoluo of Hainan, both in southern China; N.daunchina (Chang, 1933) from western China; N.pleuraden (Boulenger, 1904) from southwestern China; and N.chapaensis (Bourret, 1937) and N.lini (Chou, 1999) from the northeastern Indochinese peninsula.

During our herpetological field surveys in Mt Dayao (MDY), Guangxi, south China, we collected a series of specimens of a small-sized frog that could be assigned to the genus Nidirana by possessing large suprabrachial gland in breeding males. Further detailed comprehensive analyses of molecules, bioacoustics, and morphology indicated that this frog was distinctive from all known congeners of Nidirana. Therefore, we propose it as a new species based on this study.

Materials and methods

Taxon sampling

Eight muscular samples of the unnamed species from MDY were used for molecular analysis. All samples were attained from euthanasia specimens and then preserved in 95% ethanol and stored at -40 °C. In addition, 36 sequences from all known Nidirana species and two sequences from the out-group Babina were obtained from GenBank and incorporated into our dataset. Detail information of these materials is shown in Table 1 and Fig. 1.

Table 1.

Localities, voucher information, and GenBank numbers for all samples used in this study.

ID Species Localities (* = type localities) Voucher 16S CO1
1 Nidiranayaoica sp. nov. China: Guangxi: Mt Dayao * SYS a007009 MK882271 MK895036
2 Nidiranayaoica sp. nov. China: Guangxi: Mt Dayao * SYS a007011 MK882272 MK895037
3 Nidiranayaoica sp. nov. China: Guangxi: Mt Dayao * SYS a007012 MK882273 MK895038
4 Nidiranayaoica sp. nov. China: Guangxi: Mt Dayao * SYS a007013 MK882274 MK895039
5 Nidiranayaoica sp. nov. China: Guangxi: Mt Dayao * SYS a007014/CIB 110013 MK882275 MK895040
6 Nidiranayaoica sp. nov. China: Guangxi: Mt Dayao * SYS a007020 MK882276 MK895041
7 Nidiranayaoica sp. nov. China: Guangxi: Mt Dayao * SYS a007021 MK882277 MK895042
8 Nidiranayaoica sp. nov. China: Guangxi: Mt Dayao * SYS a007022 MK882278 MK895043
9 Nidirana adenopleura China: Zhejiang: Jingning SYS a002725 MF807827 MF807866
10 Nidirana adenopleura China: Fujian: Nanping SYS a005911 MF807844 MF807883
11 Nidirana adenopleura China: Fujian: Mt Wuyi SYS a005940 MF807851 MF807890
12 Nidirana adenopleura China: Fujian: Mt Wuyi SYS a005941 MF807852 MF807891
13 Nidirana adenopleura China: Fujian: Mt Wuyi XM2827 KF771281 /
14 Nidirana adenopleura China: Taiwan: New Taipei UMMZ 189963 DQ283117 /
15 Nidirana adenopleura Not given NMNS 2384 AF458118 /
16 Nidirana adenopleura Not given A-A-WZ001 NC018771 NC018771
17 Nidirana chapaensis Vietnam: Lao Cai: Sapa * ROM 28070 AF206460 /
18 Nidirana chapaensis Vietnam: Lao Cai: Sapa * 1999.5871 KR827710 /
19 Nidirana chapaensis Vietnam: Lao Cai: Sapa * T2483/2000.4850 KR827711 KR087625
20 Nidirana chapaensis Vietnam: Gia Lai AMSR176027 KU840598 /
21 Nidirana daunchina China: Sichuan: Mt Emei * 0609 KU840597 /
22 Nidirana daunchina China: Sichuan: Mt Emei * CIB-WU37990 DQ359988 /
23 Nidirana daunchina China: Sichuan: Mt Emei * HNNU 20060103 KF185065 /
24 Nidirana daunchina China: Sichuan: Mt Emei * SYS a004594 MF807822 MF807861
25 Nidirana daunchina China: Sichuan: Mt Emei * SYS a004595 MF807823 MF807862
26 Nidirana daunchina China: Sichuan: Hejiang SYS a004930 MF807824 MF807863
27 Nidirana daunchina China: Sichuan: Hejiang SYS a004931 MF807825 MF807864
28 Nidirana daunchina China: Sichuan: Hejiang SYS a004932 MF807826 MF807865
29 Nidirana daunchina Not given Not given / HQ395353
30 Nidirana hainanensis China: Hainan: Mt Diaoluo * SYS a003741 MF807821 MF807860
31 Nidirana hainanensis China: Hainan Not given KU840596 /
32 Nidirana lini China: Yunnan: Jiangcheng * SYS a003967 MF807818 MF807857
33 Nidirana lini China: Yunnan: Jiangcheng * SYS a003968 MF807819 MF807858
34 Nidirana lini China: Yunnan: Jiangcheng * SYS a003969 MF807820 MF807859
35 Nidirana lini China: Yunnan: Lyuchun HNNULC001 KF185066 /
36 Nidirana lini Laos: Xieng Khouang FMNH256531 KR264073 /
37 Nidirana lini Laos: Xieng Khouang FMNH256532 KR264074 /
38 Nidirana lini Not given Not given / HQ395352
39 Nidirana nankunensis China: Guangdong: Mt Nankun * SYS a005717 MF807838 MF807877
40 Nidirana nankunensis China: Guangdong: Mt Nankun * SYS a005718 MF807839 MF807878
41 Nidirana nankunensis China: Guangdong: Mt Nankun * SYS a005719 MF807840 MF807879
42 Nidirana okinavana Japan: Okinawa: Iriomote Island * Not given NC022872 NC022872
43 Nidirana pleuraden China: Yunnan: Mt Gaoligong SYS a003775 MF807816 MF807855
44 Nidirana pleuraden China: Yunnan: Mt Gaoligong SYS a003776 MF807817 MF807856
45 Babina holsti Japan: Okinawa * Not given NC022870 NC022870
46 Babina subaspera Japan: Kagoshima: Amami Island * Not given NC022871 NC022871
Open in a new tab

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Open in a new tab

Localities of the samples used in this study. The numbers correspond to the ID numbers in Table 1.

DNA Extraction, PCR amplification, and sequencing

Genomic DNA were extracted from muscle tissue samples, using DNA extraction kit from Tiangen Biotech (Beijing) Co., Ltd. Two mitochondrion genes, namely partial 16S ribosomal RNA gene (16S) and partial cytochrome C oxidase 1 gene (CO1), were amplified. Primers used for 16S were L3975 (5’-CGCCTGTTTACCAAAAACAT-3’) and H4551 (5’-CCGGTCTGAACTCAGATCACGT-3’), and L2A (5’-CCAAACGAGCCTAGTGATAGCTGGTT-3’) and H10 (5’-TGATTACGCTACCTTTGCACGGT-3’), and for CO1 were Chmf4 (5’-TYTCWACWAAYCAYAAAGAYATCGG-3’) and Chmr4 (5’-ACYTCRGGRTGRCCRAARAATCA-3’), and dgLCO (5’-GGTCAACAAATCATAAAGAYATYGG-3’) and dgHCO (5’-AAACTTCAGGGTGACCAAARAAYCA-3’), following Lyu et al. (2019). PCR amplifications were processed with the cycling conditions that initial denaturing step at 95 °C for 4 min, 35 cycles of denaturing at 94 °C for 40 s, annealing at 53 °C (for 16S) / 48 °C (for CO1) for 40 s and extending at 72 °C for 60 s, and a final extending step at 72 °C for 10 min. PCR products were purified with spin columns and then sequenced with both forward and reverse primers using BigDye Terminator Cycle Sequencing Kit per the guidelines, on an ABI Prism 3730 automated DNA sequencer by Shanghai Majorbio Bio-pharm Technology Co, Ltd. All sequences were deposited in GenBank (Table 1).

Phylogenetic analyses

DNA sequences were aligned by the Clustal W algorithm with default parameters (Thompson et al. 1997) and trimmed with the gaps partially deleted in MEGA 6 (Tamura et al. 2013). Two gene segments, 1041 base pairs (bp) of 16S and 573 bp of CO1, were concatenated seriatim into a 1614-bp sequence, and further divided into four partitions by codons. The partitions were tested in jmodeltest v2.1.2 with Akaike and Bayesian information criteria, all resulting the best-fitting nucleotide substitution models of GTR+I+G. Sequenced data was analyzed using Bayesian inference (BI) in MrBayes 3.2.4 (Ronquist et al. 2012), and maximum likelihood (ML) in RaxmlGUI 1.3 (Silvestro and Michalak 2012). Two independent runs were conducted in a BI analysis, each of which was performed for 10,000,000 generations and sampled every 1000 generations with the first 25% samples were discarded as burn-in, resulting a potential scale reduction factor (PSRF) of < 0.005. In ML analysis, the bootstrap consensus tree inferred from 1000 replicates was used to represent the evolutionary history of the taxa analyzed.

Bioacoustic analysis

Advertisement calls of the specimen SYS a007009 from MDY were recorded in the field at the air temperature of 18 °C using a SONY PCM D100 digital sound recorder. The sound files in wave format were sampled at 44.1 kHz with 24 bits in depth. Praat 6.0.27 (Boersma 2001) was used to obtain the oscillogram, sonogram, and power spectrum (window length = 0.005 s). Raven pro 1.5 (Cornell Lab of Ornithology, 2003–2014) was used to quantify the acoustic properties (window size = 256 points, fast Fourier transform, Hanning window with no overlap). The following measurements were taken for each call: call duration (the time between onset of the first note and offset of the last note in a call) and call PF (peak frequency; the frequency at which max power occurs within the call); the following measurements were taken for each note: note duration (the time between onset and offset of a note), note rise time (the time between onset and max amplitude of a note), note interval (the time between adjacent notes in a call), note PF and note IQR-BW (inter-quartile range bandwidth; the difference between the first and third quartile frequencies within a note). Mean and standard deviation (SD) were calculated in R 3.3.2 (R Core Team 2016).

Morphology

Comparison characters of all known congeners were obtained from the literature (Boettger 1895; Boulenger 1904, 1909; Schmidt 1925; Chang and Hsu 1932; Bourret 1937; Kuramoto 1985; Chou 1999; Fei et al. 2007, 2009; Matsui 2007; Chuaynkern et al. 2010; Lyu et al. 2017) and 55 examined museum specimens of six species which are listed in the Appendix 1. All specimens were fixed in 10% buffered formalin and later transferred to 70% ethanol, and deposited in the Museum of Biology, Sun Yat-sen University (SYS), Natural History Museum of Guangxi (NHMG), and Chengdu Institute of Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CIB), China.

Morphological descriptions follow the consistent definition by Fei et al. (2009), Chuaynkern et al. (2010) and Lyu et al. (2017). External measurements were made for the unnamed specimens with digital calipers (Neiko 01407A Stainless Steel 6-Inch Digital Caliper, USA) to the nearest 0.1 mm. Mean and standard deviation (SD) were calculated in R 3.3.2 (R Core Team 2016). These measurements were as follows:

SVL snout-vent length (from tip of snout to posterior margin of vent);

HDL head length (from tip of snout to the articulation of the jaw);

HDW head width (head width at the commissure of the jaws);

SNT snout length (from tip of snout to the anterior corner of the eye);

IND internasal distance (distance between nares);

IOD interorbital distance (minimum distance between upper eyelids);

ED eye diameter (from the anterior corner of the eye to posterior corner of the eye);

TD tympanum diameter (horizontal diameter of tympanum);

TED tympanum-eye distance (from anterior edge of tympanum to posterior corner of the eye);

HND hand length (from the proximal border of the outer palmar tubercle to the tip of digit III);

RAD radio-ulna length (from the flexed elbow to the proximal border of the outer palmar tubercle);

FTL foot length (from distal end of shank to the tip of digit IV);

TIB tibial length (from the outer surface of the flexed knee to the heel).

Sex and age were determined by secondary sexual characters, i.e., the presence of suprabrachial glands in males. Webbing formula was written according to Savage (1975).

Results

The ML and BI analyses resulted in essentially identical topologies and were integrated in Fig. 2, in which the major nodes were sufficiently supported with the Bayesian posterior probabilities (BPP) > 0.95 and the bootstrap supports (BS) for maximum likelihood analysis > 70. This mitochondrial result is consistent with the phylogenic relationship in Lyu et al. (2017). The Nidirana specimens from MDY, southern China, grouped in a clade with strong supported values and small divergences, forming a sister taxon to N.daunchina from western China, then together forming the sister taxon to N.chapaensis from northern Vietnam.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Open in a new tab

Bayesian inference and maximum-likelihood phylogenies. Number in parenthesis corresponds to the ID number in Table 1.

Morphologically, the specimens from MDY significantly differ from the recognized congeners by the following characteristics: (1) medium-sized body, SVL 40.4–45.9 mm in adult males vs. 33.3–37.1 mm in N.nankunensis; (2) finger IV longer than finger I vs. equal in N.chapaensis; (3) presence of lateroventral groove on every digit vs. absent on fingers and toes in N.pleuraden; absent or barely visible on fingers in N.daunchina; absent on finger I in N.chapaensis, N.lini, N.nankunensis, N.adenopleura, and N.okinavana; (4) tibio-tarsal articulation reaches the nostril vs. beyond the snout tip in N.lini; (5) the presence of a single nuptial pad vs. absent in N.hainanensis; divided into two parts in N.chapaensis; (6) the presence of a pair of subgular vocal sacs vs. absent in N.okinavana; (7) the absence of spinules on dorsal skin vs. present in N.adenopleura, N.lini and N.pleuraden. Detail comparison between the specimens from MDY and its congeners is listed in Table 2 with the characteristics item by item.

Table 2.

Diagnostic characters separating Nidiranayaoica sp. nov. from congeners.

Characteristics N. yaoica N. daunchina N. chapaensis N. hainanensis N. adenopleura N. nankunensis N. okinavana N. lini N. pleuraden
SVL of males 40.4–45.9 40.6–51.0 35.5–42.5 32.8–44.4 43.1–57.6 33.3–37.1 35.5–42.8 44.1–63.1 45.4–58.7
SVL of females / 44.0–53.0 41.0–51.8 ? 47.6–60.7 37.8–39.5 44.6–48.8 57.7–68.6 45.5–62.5
Body habitus Stocky Stocky Stocky Stocky Elongated Stocky Stocky Elongated Elongated
Fingers tips Dilated Dilated Dilated Dilated Dilated Dilated Dilated Dilated Not dilated
Lateroventral groove on fingers Present Absent or rarely present Present except finger I Present Present except finger I Present except finger I Present except finger I Present except finger I Absent
Relative length of fingers II < I < IV < III II < I < IV < III II < I = IV < III II < I < IV < III II < I < IV < III II < I < IV < III II < I < IV < III II < I < IV < III II < I < IV < III
Toes tips Dilated Dilated Dilated Dilated Dilated Dilated Dilated Dilated Not dilated
Lateroventral groove on toes Present Present Present Present Present Present Present Present Absent
Relative length of toes I < II < V < III < IV I < II < V < III < IV I < II < V < III < IV I < II < V < III < IV I < II < V < III < IV I < II < V < III < IV I < II < V < III < IV I < II < V < III < IV I < II < V < III < IV
Tibio-tarsal articulation Nostril Nostril Nostril Nostril Snout tip or eye-snout Nostril Eye center-near nostril Beyond snout Eye-snout
Subgular vocal sacs Present Present Present Present Present Present Absent Present Present
Nuptial pad One One Two Absent One One Poorly one One One
Spinules on dorsal skin Absent Absent Absent or few above vent Absent Entire or posterior dorsal skin Absent or few above vent Absent Posterior dorsal skin Posterior dorsal skin
Nest construction ? Present Present Present Absent Present Present Absent Absent
Tadpole labial tooth row formula ? 1:1+1/1+1:2 or 1:1+1/2+2:1 1:1+2/1+1:2 ? 1:1+1/1+1:2 or 1:0+0/1+1:1 1:1+1/1+1:2 1:1+1/1+1:2 1:1+1/1+1:2 1:1+1/1+1:2 or 1:1+1/2+2:1
Calling 1–3 fast-repeated notes 2–5 notes containing a specific first note 3 notes 2–4 fast-repeated double-notes 2–4 notes 13–15 fast-repeated notes containing a specific first note 10–25 fast-repeated notes 5–7 notes 4–7 notes
Cites This study Liu (1950); Fei et al. (2009); Lyu et al. (2017) Chuaynkern et al. (2010) Fei et al. (2009, 2012); Lyu et al. (2017) Pope (1931); Chuaynkern et al. (2010); Lyu et al. (2017) Lyu et al. (2017) Matsui and Utsunomiya (1983); Chuaynkern et al. (2010); Lyu et al. (2017) Chou (1999); Fei et al. (2009); Lyu et al. (2017) Fei et al. (2009); Lyu et al. (2017)
Open in a new tab

Further, the advertisement call from the frogs from MDY is different from the congeners by: (1) containing 1–3 fast-repeated identical regular notes (vs. containing 2–4 fast-repeated double-notes in N.hainanensis; containing a significantly different first note in N.daunchina and N.nankunensis); (2) the call notes last 30–54 ms vs. call notes last 115–252 ms in N.adenopleura; the first notes last 108–135 ms in N.nankunensis; the first notes last 162–197 ms and the others last 131–150 ms in N.daunchina; (3) the intervals between notes last 212–372 ms vs. last 98–213 ms in N.adenopleura; last 12–166 ms in N.nankunensis.

Therefore, based on the molecular, morphological, and bioacoustic differences, the specimens from MDY, southern China, represent an unnamed species which is described as a new species of genus Nidirana.

Taxonomy account

Nidirana yaoica sp. nov.

http://zoobank.org/D05423B2-1812-4AF4-890C-A0A1915BD8A6

Chresonymy.

Nidiranaadenopleura: Fei et al. 2009 (Mt. Dayao, Jinxiu, Guangxi); Mo et al. 2014 (Jinxiu, Guangxi)

Holotype.

SYS a007022 (Fig. 3), adult male, collected by Zhi-Tong Lyu on 1 June 2018 from Mt Dayao (24.1602N, 110.2304E; ca 1190 m a.s.l.), Jinxiu Yao Autonomous County, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, China.

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Open in a new tab

Morphological features of the adult male holotype SYS a007022 of Nidiranayaoica sp. nov. in life. A dorsolateral view B ventral view C left hand D poorly developed nuptial pad E left foot F surface of posterior dorsum and hind limbs.

Paratypes.

SYS a007009, 7011–7013, 7020–7021, SYS a007014/CIB 110013, seven adult males collected by Zhi-Tong Lyu, Yu-Long Li and Cheng-Yu Yang on 30 May–1 June 2018 from the same locality as the holotype. NHMG 1503043–47, five adult males collected by Yun-Ming Mo and Wei-Cai Chen on 19 March 2015 from the neighboring locality as the holotype (24.1035N,110.2294E; ca 1350 m a.s.l.).

Etymology.

The specific name yaoica is an adjective derived from Yao, referring to the type locality of the new species, Mt Dayao in Jinxiu Yao Autonomous County, where the settlement of the Yao people is located. We suggest its English common name to be Mt Dayao music frog and its Chinese name Yao Qin Wa (瑶琴蛙).

Differential diagnosis.

Nidiranayaoica sp. nov. is distinguished from its congeners by the following combination of the morphological characteristics: (1) body medium-size and stocky, with SVL 43.8 ± 1.7 (40.4–45.9, n = 13) mm in adult males; (2) disks of digits dilated, pointed; (3) lateroventral grooves present on every digit; (4) heels overlapping; (5) tibio-tarsal articulation reaching at the nostril; (6) mid-dorsal stripe present; (7) posterior of dorsal skin rough with dense tubercles but without spinules; (8) week supernumerary tubercles below the base of fingers III and IV, palmar tubercles prominent and distinct; (9) a pair of subgular vocal sacs present; (10) one single nuptial pad present on the first finger, nuptial spinules invisible; (11) suprabrachial gland large; (12) calling: 1–3 fast-repeated regular notes.

Description of holotype.

Adult male. Body stocky, SVL 44.6 mm; head longer than wide (HDW/HDL 0.92), flat above; snout rounded in dorsal and lateral views, slightly protruding beyond lower jaw, longer than horizontal diameter of eye (SNT/ED 1.26); canthus rostralis distinct, loreal region concave; nostril round, directed laterally, closer to the snout than to the eye; a longitudinal swollen mandibular ridge extending from below nostril through lower edges, eye and tympanum to above insertion of arm, where the ridge is intermittent, forming a maxillary gland and shoulder gland; supratympanic fold absent; interorbital space flat, narrower than internasal distance (IND/IOD 1.37); pupil elliptical, horizontal; tympanum distinct, round, TD/ED 0.72, and close to eye, TED/TD 0.38; pineal ocellus present; vomerine ridge present, bearing small teeth; tongue large, cordiform, notched behind.

Forelimbs moderately robust, lower arm 19% of SVL and hand 27% of SVL; fingers thin, relative finger lengths II < I < IV < III; tip of each finger slightly dilated and remarkable elongated, forming long pointed disks; well-developed lateroventral grooves on all fingers, not meeting at the tip of disks; fingers free of webbing; presence of weak lateral fringes on inner and outer sides of fingers II, III and IV, and on outer side of finger I; subarticular tubercles prominent and rounded; week supernumerary tubercles below the base of fingers III and IV; three elliptic, large, prominent and very distinct palmar tubercles.

Hindlimbs relatively robust, tibia 53% of SVL and foot 78% of SVL; heels overlapping when hindlimbs flexed at right angles to axis of body; tibio-tarsal articulation reaching the nostril when hindlimb is stretched along the side of the body; toes relatively long and thin, relative lengths I < II < V < III < IV; tip of each toe slightly dilated with remarkable elongated ventral callous pad, forming long and pointed disk; well-developed lateroventral grooves on toes , not meeting at the tip of disks; webbing moderate, webbing formula: I 2 - 2½ II 1⅔ - 3 III 2⅓ - 3½ IV 3½ - 2 V; presence of lateral fringes on inner and outer sides of each toes, forming distinct dermal flap on the lateral edges of toes I and V; subarticular tubercles rounded, prominent; inner metatarsal tubercle elliptic, twice as long its width; outer metatarsal tubercle indistinct, small and rounded; tarsal folds and tarsal tubercle absent.

Dorsal skin of head and anterior body smooth, posterior dorsum of body rough with dense tubercles but not bearing horny spinules; developed dorsolateral fold from posterior margin of upper eyelid to above groin but intermittent posteriorly; flank relatively smooth with dense tubercles on region nearly the dorsolateral fold; a large and smooth suprabrachial gland behind base of forelimb, slightly prominent; dorsal surface of upper arm with two longitudinal ridges and slightly extending to lower arm; the dorsal surfaces of thigh and tibia with several longitudinal ridges and tubercles bearing spinules. Ventral surface of head, body, and limbs smooth; large flattened tubercles densely arranged on the rear of thigh and around vent.

Color in life of holotype.

Dorsal surface of head and body reddish brown; pineal ocellus yellowish; a longitudinal reddish brown mid-dorsal stripe edged with broad dark brown, beginning from snout, across pineal ocellus, posteriorly extending to vent; several black spots on upper eyelids and posterior dorsum of body; dorsolateral fold bicolor, upper part reddish brown and lower part black; upper flank yellowish brown with irregular black spots; lower flank yellowish white; suprabrachial gland yellowish brown. Dorsal forelimbs reddish brown; a longitudinal black stripe on the anterior surface of the forelimb; irregular black marks on dorsal surface of the forelimb; dorsal hindlimbs non-uniform dark brown, four black crossbars on the thigh, three on the tibia and three on the tarsus; irregular black marks on dorsal toes. Loreal and temporal regions black, tympanum dark brown; upper ⅓ iris bright brownish white and lower ⅔ iris reddish brown; maxillary gland and shoulder gland yellowish white. Lips and throat grey white, but two subgular vocal sacs slightly dark colored; ventral surface of body and limbs creamy white; rear thigh tinged with pink; ventral hand and foot pale white with large black patches.

Color in preservative of holotype.

Dorsal surface faded, but dark brown edges of the mid-dorsal stripe more distinct; black spots on dorsum more distinct; upper flank black; limbs faded, the crossbars clearer; ventral surface faded, throat and posterior of chest with smoky gray markings.

Variations.

Measurements of type series are given in Table 3. All specimens were similar in morphology. Dorsal surface light brown in SYS a007009 (Fig. 4A), 7011, 7013 and 7020; mid-dorsal stripe begins from pineal ocellus in SYS a007011, 7013, 7014, 7020 and 7021 (Fig. 4B), unclear in SYS a007009; pineal ocellus invisible in SYS a007009.

Table 3.

Measurements (in mm) of the type series of Nidiranayaoica sp. nov.

Specimens No. SYS a007022 (holotype) SYS a007009 SYS a007011 SYS a007012 SYS a007013 SYS a007014 /CIB 110013 SYS a007020 SYS a007021 NHMG 1503043 NHMG 1503044 NHMG 1503045 NHMG 1503046 NHMG 1503047 summarizing of measurement (minimum-maximum, mean ± SD)
Sex Male Male Male Male Male Male Male Male Male Male Male Male Male Males
SVL 44.6 42.1 44.1 44.9 43.2 45.5 45.6 44.6 42.6 40.4 43.9 42.5 45.9 40.4–45.9, 43.8 ± 1.7
HDL 17.6 16.4 18.2 16.8 16.3 18.6 17.5 16.9 16.2 15.7 16.2 16.3 17.7 15.7–18.6, 16.9 ± 0.9
HDW 16.2 15.3 16.4 16.2 15.0 16.7 16.3 16.1 16.0 15.6 15.7 15.7 17.2 15.0–17.2, 16.0 ± 0.6
SNT 6.8 6.2 6.8 6.7 6.9 7.2 6.2 7.0 7.5 7.7 7.7 7.7 8.7 6.2–8.7, 7.2 ± 0.7
IND 5.6 5.9 5.8 6.0 5.8 5.4 5.5 5.6 6.0 6.2 6.3 6.0 6.6 5.4–6.6, 5.9 ± 0.3
IOD 4.1 4.3 4.9 4.7 5.1 4.8 4.4 4.5 4.2 3.8 3.5 3.5 4.2 3.5–5.1, 4.3 ± 0.5
ED 5.4 5.1 5.2 4.7 4.6 5.4 5.4 5.0 5.3 5.1 5.2 5.1 5.0 4.6–5.4, 5.1 ± 0.2
TD 3.9 3.2 3.4 3.7 3.9 3.9 3.6 3.9 4.1 4.1 4.2 4.1 4.5 3.2–4.5, 3.9 ± 0.4
TED 1.5 1.3 1.0 1.3 1.2 1.2 1.6 1.2 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.2 1.6 1.0–1.6, 1.2 ± 0.2
HND 12.0 10.3 11.1 10.4 10.3 11.5 10.9 12.4 10.4 10.9 12.0 10.2 12.8 10.2–12.8, 11.1 ± 0.9
RAD 8.4 8.8 9.4 8.6 8.4 8.6 8.6 8.7 8.2 8.0 7.8 8.3 8.4 7.8–9.4, 8.5 ± 0.4
FTL 34.9 33.1 34.3 34.6 34.3 35.0 33.7 35.7 32.3 3.1 32.9 32.3 35.6 3.1–35.7, 31.4 ± 9.0
TIB 23.6 23.5 23.0 22.6 23.2 23.9 23.5 23.4 22.0 21.6 22.9 22.4 25.6 21.6–25.6, 23.1 ± 1.0
HDL/SVL 0.39 0.39 0.41 0.37 0.38 0.41 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.39 0.37 0.38 0.39 0.37–0.41, 0.39 ± 0.01
HDW/SVL 0.36 0.36 0.37 0.36 0.35 0.37 0.36 0.36 0.38 0.39 0.36 0.37 0.37 0.35–0.39, 0.37 ± 0.01
HDW/HDL 0.92 0.94 0.90 0.96 0.92 0.89 0.93 0.95 0.99 0.99 0.97 0.96 0.97 0.89–0.99, 0.95 ± 0.03
SNT/HDL 0.39 0.38 0.38 0.40 0.42 0.39 0.35 0.41 0.46 0.49 0.48 0.47 0.49 0.35–0.49, 0.43 ± 0.05
SNT/SVL 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.16 0.16 0.14 0.16 0.18 0.19 0.18 0.18 0.19 0.14–0.19, 0.16 ± 0.02
IND/HDW 0.35 0.38 0.36 0.37 0.38 0.32 0.34 0.35 0.38 0.40 0.40 0.38 0.38 0.32–0.40, 0.37 ± 0.02
IOD/HDW 0.25 0.28 0.30 0.29 0.34 0.29 0.27 0.28 0.26 0.24 0.22 0.22 0.24 0.22–0.34, 0.27 ± 0.03
ED/HDL 0.31 0.31 0.28 0.28 0.28 0.29 0.31 0.30 0.33 0.32 0.32 0.31 0.28 0.28–0.33, 0.30 ± 0.02
ED/SVL 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.10 0.11 0.12 0.12 0.11 0.12 0.13 0.12 0.12 0.11 0.10–0.13, 0.12 ± 0.01
TD/ED 0.72 0.62 0.66 0.79 0.85 0.73 0.67 0.78 0.77 0.80 0.81 0.80 0.90 0.62–0.90, 0.77 ± 0.08
TED/TD 0.38 0.42 0.29 0.35 0.31 0.29 0.43 0.31 0.27 0.27 0.26 0.29 0.36 0.26–0.43, 0.32 ± 0.06
HND/SVL 0.27 0.24 0.25 0.23 0.24 0.25 0.24 0.28 0.24 0.27 0.27 0.24 0.28 0.23–0.28, 0.25 ± 0.02
RAD/SVL 0.19 0.21 0.21 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.20 0.19 0.20 0.18 0.20 0.18 0.18–0.21, 0.19 ± 0.01
FTL/SVL 0.78 0.79 0.78 0.77 0.79 0.77 0.74 0.80 0.76 0.08 0.75 0.76 0.78 0.08–0.80, 0.71 ± 0.20
TIB/SVL 0.53 0.56 0.52 0.50 0.54 0.52 0.52 0.52 0.52 0.53 0.52 0.53 0.56 0.50–0.56, 0.53 ± 0.02
Open in a new tab
Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Open in a new tab

A, B paratypes SYS a007009 and SYS a007021 of Nidiranayaoica sp. nov. C habitat of Nidiranayaoica sp. nov. in the type locality in Mt Dayao D the holotype SYS a007022 in wild.

Male secondary sexual characteristics.

A pair of subgular vocal sacs, a pair of slit-like openings at posterior of jaw; a single light brown nuptial pad on the dorsal surface of first finger, nuptial spinules invisible; suprabrachial gland present.

Distribution and ecology.

Currently, Nidiranayaoica sp. nov. is known only from the type locality, Mt Dayao, Jinxiu, Guangxi, in southern China. This frog inhabits in the swamps and ponds surrounded by moist subtropical secondary evergreen broadleaved forests (Fig. 4C, D). The adult male calls in the brushwood at the bank, from mid-March to late May. Nevertheless, the females, tadpoles, and much of the ecology and behavior of this species remain unknown.

Vocalization.

The call spectrograms are shown in Fig. 5 and the measurement parameters are listed in Table 4. The advertisement call (n = 87) of Nidiranayaoica sp. nov. contains 1–3 rapidly repeated, identical, regular notes with the PF of 516.8 Hz and note IQR-BW of 172.3 Hz or 0 generally. The one-note call (n = 25) has a duration of 43.3 ± 2.7 ms with the rise time of 10.1 ± 4.5 ms. The two-note call (n = 59) has a duration of 355.9 ± 31.1 ms; the first note lasts 43.5 ± 2.8 ms with the rise time of 8.5 ± 4.6 ms, and the second lasts 39.6 ± 3.3 ms with the rise time of 11.6 ± 4.4 ms; the note interval last 272.8 ± 31.7 ms.

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

Open in a new tab

Advertisement call spectrograms of Nidiranayaoica sp. nov. A one-note call B two-note call; C three-note call.

Table 4.

Vocalization parameters of paratype SYS a007009 of Nidiranayaoica sp. nov.

one-note call (n = 25) two-note call (n = 59) three-note call (n = 3)
Call duration (ms) 37–51, 43.3 ± 2.7 307–454, 355.9 ± 31.1 565–678, 628.0 ± 57.6
Note duration (ms) 37–51, 43.3 ± 2.7 1st note: 36–51, 43.5 ± 2.8; 1st note: 42–54, 46.7 ± 6.4;
2nd note: 30–49, 39.6 ± 3.3 2nd note: 37–40, 38.7 ± 1.5;
3rd note: 35–52, 42.3 ± 8.7
Note rise time (ms) 1.6–15.5, 10.1 ± 4.5 1st note: 2.0–16.0, 8.5 ± 4.6; 1st note: 3.7–13.7, 7.4 ± 5.5;
2nd note: 1.7–17.9, 11.6 ± 4.4 2nd note: 13.1–15.8, 14.8 ± 1.5;
3rd note: 14.0–16.1, 15.3 ± 1.1
Note interval (ms) / 215–372, 272.8 ± 31.7 1st interval: 212–250, 234.0 ± 19.7;
2nd interval: 222–302, 266.3 ± 40.7
Call PF (Hz) 516.8 516.8 516.8
Note PF (Hz) 516.8 1st note: 516.8 (98.3%) or 2584 (1.7%); 1st note: 516.8;
2nd note: 516.8 2nd note: 516.8;
3rd note: 516.8
Note IQR-BW (Hz) 172.3 (48.0%) or 0 (52.0%) 1st note: 344.5 (8.4%), 172.3 (45.8%) or 0 (45.8%); 1st note: 172.3 (33.3%) or 0 (66.6%);
2nd note: 172.3 (54.2%) or 0 (45.8%) 2nd note: 172.3 (33.3%) or 0 (66.6%);
3rd note: 172.3 (33.3%) or 0 (66.6%)
Open in a new tab

Discussion

The taxonomic status for the Nidirana population in MDY was suspected and suggested a further study by Fei et al. (2009), despite their work reported it as N.adenopleura tentatively which was followed by Mo et al. (2014). Currently this population is revealed as N.yaoica sp. nov. in present work. In morphology, this frog is similar to N.hainanensis by the presence of lateroventral groove on all digits, and further to N.daunchina, N.chapaensis, and N.okinavana by the absence of spinules on dorsal skin. Bioacoustically, N.yaoica sp. nov. has the same calling pattern as N.adenopleura, which contains several fast-repeated identical regular notes, but different from the pattern in N.daunchina and N.hainanensis. The phylogenetic tree showed that the new species is closer to N.daunchina with moderate supports (BPP 0.98 and BS 88), and then to N.chapaensis and N.hainanensis.

The genus Nidirana was recognized as a distinct genus recently based on comprehensive evidence by Lyu et al. (2017). For the interspecific relationship within the genus, Dubois (1992) constructed two morphological species groups: N.pleuraden group for N.pleuraden and N.adenopleura group for the other known species; Fei et al. (2009) proposed N.daunchina group for N.daunchina and N.psaltes Kuramoto, 1985 (= N.okinavana), and N.adenopleura group for N.adenopleura, N.lini, and N.hainanensis, but excluding N.chapaensis, and placing N.pleuraden in another genus Pelophylax Fitzinger, 1843; Chuaynkern et al. (2010) suggested three species groups for Music frogs based on the morphological characters and ecological behavior of nest construction: N.pleuraden group for N.pleuraden, N.adenopleura group for N.adenopleura and N.lini, and N.okinavana group for N.daunchina, N.okinavana, and N.chapaensis. From the current mitochondrial results (Lyu et al. 2017; this study), the N.pleuraden consistently formed the basal lineage of this genus, while the monophyly of the three species groups N.adenopleura group (Fei et al. 2009; Chuaynkern et al. 2010), N.okinavana group, and N.daunchina group, was challenged. The main conflicts are: (1) N.okinavana was suggested morphologically more similar to N.daunchina and N.chapaensis (Fei et al. 2009; Chuaynkern et al. 2010) while clustered with N.adenopleura in the phylogeny; (2) N.hainanensis was suggested morphologically more similar to N.adenopleura and N.lini (Fei et al. 2009) while clustered with N.daunchina and N.chapaensis in the phylogeny; (3) N.lini was suggested morphologically more similar to N.adenopleura (Fei et al. 2009; Chuaynkern et al. 2010) while formed the basal lineage of the congeners except N.pleuraden in the phylogeny.

Thus we propose to follow Dubois’s (1992) suggestion, regarding two species groups within the genus Nidirana: (1) N.pleuraden group, the lateroventral groove absent on fingers and toes: one species, N.pleuraden; (2) N.adenopleura group, the lateroventral groove present on toes, absent or present on fingers: eight species, N.adenopleura, N.okinavana, N.nankunensis, N.hainanensis, N.chapaensis, N.daunchina, N.yaoica sp. nov., and N.lini.

Supplementary Material

XML Treatment for Nidirana yaoica
zookeys.858.34363-treatment1.xml (52.1KB, xml)

Acknowledgements

We thank Wei-Cai Chen, Jun Wu, and Cheng-Yu Yang for their help in the fieldwork. We are grateful to Annemarie Ohler, Yodchaiy Chuaynkern, and an anonymous reviewer for their valuable suggestions on the manuscript. This work was supported by the Project of Comprehensive Scientific Survey of Luoxiao Mountains Region of Ministry of Science and Technology, China (No. 2013FY111500), the Specimen Platform of Ministry of Science and Technology, China, teaching specimens sub-platform (No. 2005DKA21403-JK), and the Project of Animal Diversity Survey and Monitoring System Construction of Guangdong Shimentai National Nature Reserve.

Appendix 1

Specimens examined

Nidiranaadenopleura (29): China: Fujian: Yanping District (type locality): SYS a005911–5916; Mt Wuyi: SYS a005939–5943; Jiangshi Nature Reserve: SYS a004112, 4132; Mt Yashu: SYS a005890–5891, 5901–5902; Jiangxi: Tongboshan Nature Reserve: SYS a001663–1665, 1667, 1698; Yangjifeng Nature Reserve: SYS a0000317, 0334; Jinggangshan Nature Reserve: SYS a004025–4027; Zhejiang: Jingning County: Dongkeng Town: SYS a002725–2726.

Nidiranadaunchina (5): China: Sichuan: Mt Emei (type locality): SYS a004594–4595; Hejiang County: Zihuai Town: SYS a004930–4932.

Nidiranahainanensis (1): China: Hainan: Mt Diaoluo (type locality): SYS a003741.

Nidiranalini (4): China: Yunnan: Jiangcheng County: Hongjiang Town (type locality): SYS a003967–3970.

Nidirananankunensis (12): China: Guangdong: Mt Nankun (type locality): SYS a003615, 3617–3620, 4019, 4905–4907, 5717–5719 (type series).

Nidiranapleuraden (4): China: Yunnan: Mt Gaoligong: SYS a003775–3778.

Citation

Lyu Z-T, Mo Y-M, Wan H, Li Y-L, Pang H, Wang Y-Y (2019) Description of a new species of Music frogs (Anura, Ranidae, Nidirana) from Mt Dayao, southern China. ZooKeys 858: 109–126. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.858.34363

Contributor Information

Hong Pang, Email: lsshpang@mail.sysu.edu.cn.

Ying-Yong Wang, Email: wangyy@mail.sysu.edu.cn.

References

  1. Boersma P. (2001) Praat, a system for doing phonetics by computer. Glot International 5: 341–345. [Google Scholar]
  2. Boettger O. (1895) Neue Frösche und Schlangen von den Liukiu-Inseln. Zoologischer Anzeiger 18: 66–270. [Google Scholar]
  3. Boulenger GA. (1904) Descriptions of new frogs and snakes from Yunnan. Annals and Magazine of Natural History, Series 7: 130–135. 10.1080/00222930408562447 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  4. Boulenger GA. (1909) Descriptions of four new frogs and a new snake discovered by Mr. H. Sauter in Formosa. Annals and Magazine of Natural History, Series 8: 492–495. 10.1080/00222930908692704 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bourret R. (1937) Notes herpétologiques sur l’Indochine française. XIV. Les batraciens de la collection du Laboratoire des Sciences Naturelles de l’Université. Descriptions de quinze espèces ou variétés nouvelles. Annexe au Bulletin Général de l’Instruction Publique, Hanoi.
  6. Chang MLY, Hsu HF. (1932) Study of some amphibians from Szechuan. Contributions from the Biological Laboratory of the Science Society of China. Zoological Series 8: 137–181. [Google Scholar]
  7. Chen L, Murphy RW, Lathrop A, Ngo A, Orlov NL, Ho CT, Somorjai IL. (2005) Taxonomic chaos in Asian ranid frogs: an initial phylogenetic resolution. Herpetological Journal 15: 231–243. [Google Scholar]
  8. Chou WH. (1999) A new frog of the genus Rana (Anura: Ranidae) from China. Herpetologica 55: 389–400. [Google Scholar]
  9. Chuaynkern Y, Ohler A, Inthara C, Duengkae P, Makchai S, Salangsingha N. (2010) A revision of species in the subgenusNidirana Dubois, 1992, with special attention to the identity of specimens allocated to Ranaadenopleura Boulenger, 1909, and Ranachapaensis (Bourret, 1937) (Amphibia: Anura: Ranidae) from Thailand and Laos. Raffles Bulletin of Zoology 58: 291–310. [Google Scholar]
  10. Dubois A. (1987) Miscellanea taxinomica batrachologica (I). Alytes 5: 7–95. [Google Scholar]
  11. Dubois A. (1992) Notes sur la classification des Ranidae (Amphibiens anoures). Bulletin Mensuel de la Société Linnéenne de Lyon 61: 305–352. 10.3406/linly.1992.11011 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  12. Fei L, Hu SQ, Ye CY, Huang YZ. (2009) Fauna Sinica. Amphibia Vol. 2 Anura. Science Press, Beijing. [In Chinese]
  13. Fei L, Ye CY, Jiang JP. (2007) A new species of Ranidae, Hylarana (Nidirana) hainanensis, from China (Amphibia: Anura). Herpetologica Sinica 11: 1–4. [In Chinese] [Google Scholar]
  14. Fei L, Ye CY, Jiang JP. (2010) Phylogenetic systematics of Ranidae. Herpetologica Sinica 12: 1–43. [In Chinese] [Google Scholar]
  15. Fei L, Ye CY, Jiang JP. (2012) Colored atlas of Chinese Amphibians and their distributions. Sichuan Publishing Group/Sichuan Publishing House of Science & Technology, Chengdu. [In Chinese]
  16. Frost DR. (2019) Amphibian Species of the World: an Online Reference. Version 6.0. Electronic Database. American Museum of Natural History, New York, USA. http://research.amnh.org/herpetology/amphibia/index.html [accessed 7 March 2019]
  17. Frost DR, Grant T, Faivovich J, Bain RH, Haas A, Haddad CF, de Sa RO, Channing A, Wilkinson M, Donnellan SC, Raxworthy CJ, Campbell JA, Blotto BL, Moler P, Drewes RC, Nussbaum RA, Lynch JD, Green DM, Wheeler WC. (2006) The amphibian tree of life. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 297: 1–291. 10.1206/0003-0090(2006)297[0001:TATOL]2.0.CO;2 [DOI]
  18. Kuramoto M. (1985) A new frog (genus Rana) from the Yaeyama Group of the Ryukyu Islands. Herpetologica 41: 150–158. [Google Scholar]
  19. Liu CC. (1950) Amphibians of western China. Fieldiana: Zoology Memoirs 2: 1–400. 10.5962/bhl.title.2977 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  20. Lyu ZT, Huang LS, Wang J, Li YQ, Chen HH, Qi S, Wang YY. (2019) Description of two cryptic species of the Amolopsricketti group (Anura, Ranidae) from southeastern China. ZooKeys 812: 133–156. 10.3897/zookeys.812.29956 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Lyu ZT, Zeng ZC, Wang J, Lin CY, Liu ZY, Wang YY. (2017) Resurrection of genus Nidirana (Anura: Ranidae) and synonymizing N.caldwelli with N.adenopleura, with description of a new species from China. Amphibia-Reptilia 38: 483–502. 10.1163/15685381-00003130 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  22. Matsui M. (2007) Unmasking Ranaokinavana Boettger, 1895 from the Ryukyus, Japan (Amphibia: Anura: Ranidae). Zoological Science 24: 199–204. 10.2108/zsj.24.199 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Matsui M, Utsunomiya T. (1983) Mating call characteristics of the frogs of the subgenusBabina with reference to their relationship with Ranaadenopleura. Journal of Herpetology 17: 32–37. 10.2307/1563777 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  24. Mo YM, Wei ZY, Chen WC. (2014) Colored atlas of Guangxi amphibians. Guangxi Science& Technology Publishing House. [In Chinese]
  25. Pope CH. (1931) Notes on amphibians from Fukien, Hainan and other parts of China. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 61: 397–611. [Google Scholar]
  26. Ronquist F, Teslenko M, Van Der Mark P, Ayres DL, Darling A, Höhna S, Larget B, Liu L, Suchard MA, Huelsenbeck JP. (2012) MrBayes 3.2: efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Systematic Biology 61: 539–542. 10.1093/sysbio/sys029 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Savage JM. (1975) Systematics and distribution of the Mexican and Central American stream frogs related to Eleutherodactylusrugulosus. Copeia 2: 254–306. 10.2307/1442883 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  28. Schmidt KP. (1925) New Chinese amphibians and reptiles. American Museum Novitates 175: 1–3. [Google Scholar]
  29. Silvestro D, Michalak I. (2012) RaxmlGUI: a graphical front-end for RAxML. Organisms Diversity and Evolution 12: 335–337. 10.1007/s13127-011-0056-0 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  30. Tamura K, Stecher G, Peterson D, Filipski A, Kumar S. (2013) MEGA6: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis, version 6.0. Molecular Biology and Evolution 30: 2725–2729. 10.1093/molbev/mst197 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Plewniak F, Jeanmougin F, Higgins DG. (1997) The CLUSTAL_X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Research 25: 4876–4882. 10.1093/nar/25.24.4876 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

XML Treatment for Nidirana yaoica
zookeys.858.34363-treatment1.xml (52.1KB, xml)

Articles from ZooKeys are provided here courtesy of Pensoft Publishers

RESOURCES