In the published article, there was a mistake in Figure 3(D) and Figure 4 as published. The corrected Figure 3(D) and Figure 4 appear below. The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.
Figure 3.
Effect of Res on Dex-induced bone damage in zebrafish. IOD values of green fluorescence of Res after Dex-induced bone damage in TG zebrafish larvae (A). Images of green fluorescence in TG zebrafish larvae skull [in profile (B)]. The Res concentrations used were 25.00, 50.00, 75.00, 100.00, 150.00, 200.00, and 250.00 μmol/l, and 0.1% DMSO served as the control. The area of bone mineralization after Res treatment of Dex-induced bone damage in AB-strain zebrafish larvae at 9 dpf [(C) 15.00 μmol/l Dex vs. 15.00 μmol/l Dex plus 150.00 μmol/l Res]. Alizarin red S staining of the skull after Res treatment of Dex-induced bone damage in AB-strain zebrafish larvae at 9 dpf (D). n = 15, *p < 0.05, ***p < 0.01.
Figure 4.
Comparison of survival rates of zebrafish exposed to Dex and Res. Survival rate of zebrafish larvae with Dex-induced bone damage (A). Survival rate of zebrafish larvae with Dex-induced bone damage treated using Res (B). n = 25, *p < 0.05, ***p < 0.01.
Figure 3(D): The picture is correct, but the following explanatory note needed to be added under the picture.
0.5%DNSO 15μmol/L Dex 15μmol/L Dex +150 μmol/L Res
Figure 4: The picture is correct, but the correct explanatory note needed to be added under the picture.