Skip to main content
Wiley Open Access Collection logoLink to Wiley Open Access Collection
. 2019 May 15;79(10):1191–1196. doi: 10.1002/pros.23823

TMPRSS2‐ERG fusions linked to prostate cancer racial health disparities: A focus on Africa

James Blackburn 1,2, Stefano Vecchiarelli 1, Erin E Heyer 1, Sean M Patrick 3, Ruth J Lyons 1, Weerachai Jaratlerdsiri 1, Smit van Zyl 4, M S Riana Bornman 3, Tim R Mercer 1,2,5, Vanessa M Hayes 1,2,3,4,6,✉
PMCID: PMC6617820  PMID: 31090091

Abstract

Background

The androgen‐regulated gene TMPRSS2 to the ETS transcription factor gene ERG fusion is the most common genomic alteration acquired during prostate tumorigenesis and biased toward men of European ancestry. In contrast, African American men present with more advanced disease, yet their tumors are less likely to acquire TMPRSS2‐ERG. Data for Africa is scarce.

Methods

RNA was made available for genomic analyses from 181 prostate tissue biopsy cores from Black South African men, 94 with and 87 without pathological evidence for prostate cancer. Reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction was used to screen for the TMPRSS2‐ERG fusion, while transcript junction coordinates and isoform frequencies, including novel gene fusions, were determined using targeted RNA sequencing.

Results

Here we report a frequency of 13% for TMPRSS2‐ERG in tumors from Black South Africans. Present in 12/94 positive versus 1/87 cancer negative prostate tissue cores, this suggests a 92.62% predictivity for a positive cancer diagnosis (P = 0.0031). At a frequency of almost half that reported for African Americans and roughly a quarter of that reported for men of European ancestry, acquisition of TMPRSS2‐ERG appears to be inversely associated with aggressive prostate cancer. Further support was provided by linking the presence of TMPRSS2‐ERG to low‐grade disease in younger patients (P = 0.0466), with higher expressing distal ERG fusion junction coordinates.

Conclusions

Only the second study of its kind for the African continent, we support a link between TMPRSS2‐ERG status and prostate cancer racial health disparity beyond the borders of the United States. We call for urgent evaluation of androgen deprivation therapy within Africa.

Keywords: African ancestry, early‐onset, fusion gene, prostate cancer, racial health disparity, TMPRSS2‐ ERG

1. INTRODUCTION

The most frequent somatic alteration in prostate cancer (PCa) involves an intrachromosomal translocation or deletion event on the long arm of chromosome 21. This genomic alteration appears to occur early in tumourigenesis, resulting in fusion of the androgen‐regulated transmembrane protease serine 2 gene (TMPRSS2) to a member of the transcription factor erythroblastosis virus E26 transforming sequence family (ERG)1, leading to androgen‐dependent overexpression of ERG. 2 The frequency of TMPRSS2‐ERG fusions in PCa shows a notable racial disparity. A recent meta‐analysis confirmed the highest prevalence rates in men of European ancestry (49%), with lower levels reported for men of Asian (27%) and African (25%) ancestries.3 The latter includes three African American studies (73/260; 28%) and a single study from West Africa, specifically Ghana (47/262; 18%). There also appears to be racial discordance in the mechanism of TMPRSS2‐ERG occurrence, with African Americans most commonly exhibiting fusion through deletion, and European and Asian Americans through translocation.4 Intriguingly, African ancestry is significantly associated with high‐grade (Gleason score ≥ 8) PCa,5 which questions the role of TMPRSS2‐ERG fusions in tumor development in African populations. Reporting a 2.1‐fold increase in high‐grade PCa presentation in Black South African men compared with African Americans,6 we sought to determine the frequency, composition, and clinicopathological association of acquired TMPRSS2‐ERG fusions within non‐American men of African ancestry.

2. PATIENTS AND METHODS

2.1. Clinicopathological overview and ethics

Patients were enrolled at time of diagnosis as part of the Southern African Prostate Cancer Study (SAPCS)6 and presented at one of the participating urological clinics within the Provinces of Limpopo or Gauteng of South Africa. All self‐identified ethnically as Black South African, including a single Black Zimbabwean, from one of 11 ethnic groupings, with age and prostate specific antigen levels recorded at time of diagnosis (Table 1). Clinicopathological analyses confirmed 94 men with PCa (positive Gleason score) and 87 without PCa (negative Gleason score), either with (n = 56) or without (n = 31) the presence of benign prostate hyperplasia.

Table 1.

Clinical and pathological characteristics

PCa BPH No PCa
Number of patients (n = 181) 94 56 31
Ethnicity Pedi 39 27 22
Sotho 5 1 2
Swazi 2 3 2
Tsonga 8 6 1
Tswana 3 4 0
Venda 8 6 2
Ndebele 18 5 0
Zulu 6 3 2
Xhosa 3 0 0
Colored 1 1 0
Shona 1 0 0
Median (IQR) age at diagnosis in years 69 (44‐94) 69 (53‐89) 67 (50‐92)
Median (IQR) PSA at diagnosis ng/mL 51.5 (4.4‐2000) 17.3 (2.2‐1000) 16.1 (2‐1475)
Pathological grading ISUP1 18 – –
ISUP2 18 – –
ISUP3 12 – –
ISUP4 23 – –
ISUP5 23 – –

Abbreviations: BPH, benign prostate hyperplasia; IQR, interquartile range; ISUP, International Society of Urological Pathology grading system; PCa, prostate cancer; PSA, prostate specific antigen.

The study was approved by the Medical/Human Research Ethics Committee's (MREC or HREC) from the University of Limpopo's Medunsa Campus (MREC/H/28/2009) and the University of Pretoria's Faculty of Health Sciences (HREC #43/2010) in South Africa. Patients provided written informed consent before enrollment. Prostate tissue samples were shipped to the Garvan Institute of Medical Research under the Republic of South Africa Department of Health Export Permit, in accordance with the National Health Act 2003 (J1/2/4/2 #1/12). Analysis of the samples was performed in accordance with St Vincent's Hospital (SVH) HREC site‐specific approval (#SVH15/227).

2.2. TMPRSS2‐ERG screening

RNA was prepared from 181 prostate tissue core biopsies. Presence of the TMPRSS2‐ERG fusion gene was determined using two sets of previously described reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT‐PCR) primer pairs,1 including a single forward primer located in exon 1 of TMPRSS2: 5′‐CAGGAGGCGGAGGCGGA‐3′ and two ERG reverse primers located in exon 4: 5′‐GTAGGCACACTCAAACAACGACTGG‐3′ and exon 6: 5′‐GGCGTTGTAGCTGGGGGTGAG‐3′ (Figure 1A). PC3 and VCaP cell lines represented TMPRSS2‐ERG fusion gene negative and positive controls, respectively.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Summary of TMPRSS2‐ERG fusion gene diagnosis. (A) Schematic representation of the fusion gene resulting from a genomic rearrangement within TMPRSS2 intron 1 and ERG intron 3. Locations of forward TMPRSS2 and reverse ERG PCR primers are shown as arrows. (B) Difference in age at diagnosis for TMPRSS2‐ERG positive versus negative low‐grade (ISUP 1 and 2) and high‐grade (ISUP 3 to 5) tumors

2.3. Targeted fusion RNA sequencing

Targeted RNA sequencing (RNA CaptureSeq) was used to generate a snapshot validation for RT‐PCR screening and to define the exact TMPRSS2‐ERG fusion transcript junction coordinates. In brief, sequencing libraries were prepared from 1 μg of patient RNA using the KAPA Stranded RNA‐Seq Library Preparation Kit (Roche, Basel, Switzerland). Capture was performed according to manufacturer's instructions (Roche) using custom biotinylated probes including known PCa associated chromosomal translocations. Captured libraries were sequenced to standard depth (125‐bp paired‐end) using the Illumina HiSeq. 2500 System v4 (Illumina, San Diego, CA). Post‐filtering, reads were mapped to human reference genome hg38 with STAR v2.4.2a7 and fusion genes identified with STAR‐Fusion and FusionCatcher v0.99.6 beta.8 Only the fusion transcript isoforms identified by both programs within each patient sample were used in further analysis.

2.4. TMPRSS2‐ERG expression

Expression of the TMPRSS2‐ERG fusion gene in each patient was calculated by normalizing the total number of fusion supporting reads to individual sequencing library sizes.

2.5. Statistics

Variables between groups were analyzed using Fisher's exact test. P < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

3. RESULTS

3.1. Frequency and distribution of TMPRSS2‐ERG fusion

The frequency of TMPRSS2‐ERG fusion gene occurrence was 12.8% (12/94) in PCa and 1.5% (1/87) in noncancerous prostate tissue. Thus the presence of TMPRSS2‐ERG in this population is 92.62% predictive for a positive diagnosis of PCa (P = 0.0031), with a negative predictive value of 51.25%.

Although rare, we observed an even distribution for TMPRSS2‐ERG in patients defined at clinical presentation by the International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP)9 as high‐grade (ISUP 3 to 5; Gleason score ≥ 4 + 3; n = 6) or low‐grade (ISUP 1 and 2; Gleason score ≤ 3 + 4; n = 6) (Table 1). We found the median age at diagnosis for patients presenting with low‐grade TMPRSS2‐ERG positive tumors (65.5 years) was almost 8 years younger than patients with low‐grade TMPRSS2‐ERG negative tumors (73 years, P = 0.04656) and almost 7 years younger than TMPRSS2‐ERG positive high‐grade tumors (72 years) (Figure 1B).

3.2. TMPRSS2‐ERG validation, isoforms and ERG expression

Using our targeted RNA CaptureSeq method, we validated the RT‐PCR screening approach confirming TMPRSS2‐ERG status for the 12 fusion positive and 12 randomly selected early‐onset (range 44 to 62 years) fusion negative PCa cases. Each TMPRSS2‐ERG fusion positive tumor presented with minimally two and maximally five TMPRSS2‐ERG fusion isoforms (total of 40 fusion junctions), with three patients also presenting a novel fusion event: RP11‐356O9.1‐ETV1 in two patients and PTPRK‐LAMA2 in a single patient. No novel fusion events were identified within the fusion negative tumors.

Consistent with previous findings, the most common TMPRSS2 fusion junctions were located within the first intron downstream of three alternative noncoding exons, with only two samples utilizing TMPRSS2 fusion coordinates beyond exon 2 (4/40) (Figure 2A). Similarly, ERG fusion junctions were dominated by a fusion upstream of exon 4 (24/40), with the second most common being a fusion upstream of exon 2 (8/40, traditionally noncoding). Within each patient tumor, ERG fusion coordinates always occurred either upstream or downstream of exon 3, but never both (Figure 2B).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

TMPRSS2‐ERG fusion gene isoforms detected in 12 prostate tumors from African patients. (A) TMPRSS2 and ERG gene structures and TMPRSS2‐ERG fusion isoform prevalence across all patients based on the GENCODE v27 comprehensive exon annotation. Bar charts quantify the number of samples expressing each isoform. For simplicity, TMPRSS2 junctions beyond exon 1 are depicted with exon 1a. Black line represents retained intronic sequence. (B) Isoform prevalence, represented as fusion position between TMPRSS2 and ERG for each patient. Light and dark blue panels denote proximal and distal ERG junction positions. (C) Boxplot of TMPRSS2‐ERG expression relative to ERG fusion position. (D) Boxplot of patient age at diagnosis relative to ERG fusion position. Each dot represents a single patient sample [Color figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]

Though not statistically significant due to small sample size, there was a striking difference in the expression levels of patients presenting with either the proximal or distal ERG fusion coordinates, with higher expression detected from the distal isoforms (Figure 2C). Additionally, patients possessing the higher expressing distal ERG fusion coordinates presented earlier at diagnosis, with a median age of 69 years (range 55 to 73 years) compared with the three patients with the lower expressing proximal coordinates, at 72, 78, and 81 years (Figure 2D).

4. DISCUSSION

Although genomic instability is assumed to increase with tumor progression,10 we show that Black South African men with significant high‐grade PCa have lower frequencies of TMPRSS2‐ERG fusion than men of European ancestry. When present, we show a tendency for association with early‐onset low‐grade PCa presentation, with higher expression from distal ERG junction coordinates. Experimental data performed in prostate epithelial cells supports the hypothesis that increased androgen levels in younger men may be directly related to the increase in TMPRSS2‐ERG expression,11 while a previous European‐based study reported accumulation of nonandrogen associated genomic alterations with patient and tumor age, dependent on TMPRSS2‐ERG status.12

Interestingly, we identified two novel fusion events including ETV1—commonly fused in PCa—with novel partner RP11‐356O9.1 (in 2/12 TMPRSS2‐ERG positive tumors), and the well‐known colorectal fusion gene PTPRK 13 fused with novel partner LAMA2. While no novel fusion events were identified in the 12 TMPRSS2‐ERG negative tumors using our targeted RNA CaptureSeq method, through the first deep whole genome sequencing of tumor‐normal pairs from six African high‐risk treatment‐naïve PCa patients, we recently reported a significant increase in small somatic variation (tumor mutational burden; 3.8 mutations/Mbp), lack of ETS fusions and under‐representation of complex genomic rearrangements, compared with European‐derived matched tumors.14 As such, we have recently called for much needed genome profiling of PCa within African populations to help explain the apparent racial health disparities.15

While androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) administered through hormone blockers are traditionally used for treating advanced PCa, in Southern Africa orchidectomy is still common practice. Either way, the goal is to inhibit androgen receptor (AR) signaling.16 Combining ADT with docetaxel, a taxane chemotherapy, has been shown to provide further survival benefit to patients.17 The positive effect of docetaxel is believed to act, at least in part, through impairing AR activity.18 In turn, TMPRSS2‐ERG fusion positive patients appear to respond well to ADT and neoadjuvant docetaxel, compared with untreated patients.19 More recently, a large study out of China suggests that TMPRSS2‐ERG fusion is a biomarker for predicting response to ADT.20 The lack of androgen‐regulated TMPRSS2‐ERG fusion within African populations biased toward aggressive disease presentation, calls for immediate assessment of the true benefit of ADT, taking into consideration significant long‐term side effects of the more commonly practiced orchidectomy, within the continent.

5. SUMMARY

To the best of our knowledge, this is the second only PCa study of its kind for Africa and the first for southern Africa. Built on observations made within African Americans and combined with the single study from Ghana, it is becoming evident that TMPRSS2‐ERG fusions are significantly less common in driving prostate tumourigenesis within populations from Africa. This is further supported by an inverse association between presence and adverse outcomes, as well as our observed link with younger‐onset low‐risk disease.

CONFLICT OF INTERESTS

The authors declare that there are no conflict of interests.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTION

VMH, JB, and TRM designed the study. SMP, SvZ, and MSRB consented, performed clinical evaluation, and processed the samples. JB, SV, and RJL performed the experiments. JB, EEH, WJ, and VMH performed analysis and interpretation of results. JB and VMH drafted the manuscript. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We are eternally grateful to the patients for their participation, as well as the nurses and urology staff for recruiting and maintaining the Southern African Prostate Cancer Study (SAPCS). We thank the Cancer Association of South Africa (CANSA) and National Research Foundation (NRF) South Africa for funds to support and maintain the SAPCS (to MSRB. and VMH). The project was further supported by a University of Sydney Bridging Support Grant to V.M.H. (#G199756), with additional support from the Australian Prostate Cancer Research Centre (APCRC) NSW. National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) grants support JB (#APP1108254 and APP1114016) and EEH (#APP1103685), while VMH is supported by the University of Sydney Foundation and Petre Foundation, Australia.

DECLARATION OF TRANSPARENCY AND SCIENTIFIC RIGOR

This Declaration acknowledges that this paper adheres to the principles for transparent reporting and scientific rigor of preclinical research recommended by funding agencies, publishers, and other organizations engaged with supporting research.

AVAILABILITY OF DATA AND MATERIAL

Data sharing not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.

Blackburn J, Vecchiarelli S, Heyer EE, et al. TMPRSS2‐ERG fusions linked to prostate cancer racial health disparities: A focus on Africa. The Prostate. 2019;79:1191‐1196. 10.1002/pros.23823

References

REFERENCES

  • 1. Tomlins SA. Recurrent fusion of TMPRSS2 and ETS transcription factor genes in prostate cancer. Science. 2005;310:644‐648. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Sreenath TL, Dobi A, Petrovics G, Srivastava S. Oncogenic activation of ERG: a predominant mechanism in prostate cancer. J Carcinog. 2011;10:37. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Zhou CK, Young D, Yeboah ED, et al. TMPRSS2:ERG gene fusions in prostate cancer of West African men and a meta‐analysis of racial differences. Am J Epidemiol. 2017;186:1352‐1361. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Magi‐Galluzzi C, Tsusuki T, Elson P, et al. TMPRSS2‐ERG gene fusion prevalence and class are significantly different in prostate cancer of Caucasian, African‐American and Japanese patients. Prostate. 2011;71:489‐497. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Siegel R, Ma J, Zou Z, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2014. CA Cancer J Clin. 2014;64:9‐29. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Tindall EA, Monare LR, Petersen DC, et al. Clinical presentation of prostate cancer in Black South Africans. Prostate. 2014;74:880‐891. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Haas BJ, Dobin A, Stransky N, et al. STAR‐Fusion: fast and accurate fusion transcript detection from RNA‐Seq. bioRxiv. 2017:pp. 22 10.1101/120295 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Nicorici D, Satalan M, Edgren H, Kangaspeska S. FusionCatcher—a tool for finding somatic fusion genes in paired‐end RNA‐sequencing data. bioRxiv. 2014. 10.1101/011650 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Epstein JI, Egevad L, Amin MB, Delahunt B, Srigley JR, Humphrey PA. The 2014 international society of urological pathology (ISUP) consensus conference on Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma: definition of grading patterns and proposal for a new grading system. Am J Surg Pathol. 2016;40:244‐252. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Yao XD, Dai W. Genomic instability and cancer. J Carcinog Mutagen. 2014;5:1000165. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Mani RS, Tomlins SA, Callahan K, et al. Induced chromosomal proximity and gene fusions in prostate cancer. Science. 2009;326:1230‐1230. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Steurer S, Mayer PS, Adam M, et al. TMPRSS2‐ERG fusions are strongly linked to young patient age in low‐grade prostate cancer. Eur Urol. 2014;66:978‐981. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Sekine S, Yamashita S, Tanabe T, et al. Frequent PTPRK‐RSPO3 fusions and RNF43 mutations in colorectal traditional serrated adenoma. J Pathol. 2016;239:133‐138. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Jaratlerdsiri W, Chan EKF, Gong T, et al. Whole genome sequencing reveals elevated tumor mutational burden and initiating driver mutations in African men with treatment‐naive, high‐risk prostate cancer. Cancer Res. 2018;78:6736‐6746. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Hayes VM, Jaratlerdsiri W, Bornman MSR. Prostate cancer genomics and racial health disparity. Oncotarget. 2018;9:36650‐36651. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Knudsen KE, Scher HI. Starving the addiction: new opportunities for durable suppression of AR signaling in prostate cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2009;15:4792‐4798. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Zhu ML, Horbinski CM, Garzotto M, Qian DZ, Beer TM, Kyprianou N. Tubulin‐targeting chemotherapy impairs androgen receptor activity in prostate cancer. Cancer Res. 2010;70:7992‐8002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Vale CL, Burdett S, Rydzewska LH, et al. Addition of docetaxel or bisphosphonates to standard of care in men with localised or metastatic, hormone‐sensitive prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta‐analyses of aggregate data. Lancet Oncol. 2016;17:243‐256. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Beltran H, Wyatt AW, Chedgy EC, et al. Impact of therapy on genomics and transcriptomics in high‐risk prostate cancer treated with neoadjuvant docetaxel and androgen deprivation therapy. Clin Cancer Res. 2017;23(22):6802‐6811. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Nie L, Pan X, Zhang M, et al. The expression profile and heterogeneity analysis of ERG in 633 consecutive prostate cancers from a single center. Prostate. 2019. [published online ahead of print March 22, 2019]. 10.1002/pros.23785 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Prostate are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES