Chronic stress and poor body condition may make animals vulnerable to predation. We examined cortisol and marrow lipids as bioindicators of stress and condition, respectively, in wolf-killed ungulates. We found that wolf-killed bison had elevated cortisol, and there was a negative correlation between cortisol and marrow lipids.
Keywords: Bison, cortisol, gray wolf, marrow fat, predation, stress
Abstract
Chronic stress and poor body condition can cause adverse physiological and behavioural responses and may make animals more vulnerable to predation. We examined hair cortisol concentration (HCC) and marrow lipid content, as bioindicators of chronic stress and body condition, respectively, of bison (Bison bison bison), moose (Alces alces) and white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) killed by wolves (Canis lupus) in Prince Albert National Park (PANP), Saskatchewan, Canada. The Sturgeon River plains bison population in PANP is one of only a few wild populations of plains bison in their historical range in Canada and has experienced a decline of around 50% since 2005. We expected wolf-killed bison to have elevated HCC compared to human-harvested bison and that there would be a negative relationship between HCC and marrow lipids among wolf-killed animals. We compared HCC between different mortality sources for bison (wolf-killed n = 20 or human-harvested n = 23) and found that HCC was significantly elevated in wolf-killed bison (¯ = 7.56 ± 1.35 pg/mg). We found that HCC, species, sex and snow depth were all significant predictor variables of marrow lipid content of bison (n = 14), moose (n = 11) and deer (n = 27). Bison displayed the strongest negative correlation between HCC and marrow lipid content (r2 = 0.31). Our results suggest that chronic stress and poor body condition make prey more vulnerable to predation by wolves. HCC and marrow lipid content can provide reliable indicators of the physiological response of animals to stressors and may provide information on expected predator success that can be used to predict predator population dynamics.
Introduction
In vertebrates, adverse stressors cause the release of glucocorticoids (GCs) from the adrenal cortex via the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal (HPA) axis (Creel et al., 2009). The release of GC is a component of the stress response and plays a key role in allostasis, which is the active process of maintaining and/or reestablishing homeostasis (McEwen, 1998). GCs, such as cortisol, cause behavioural and/or physiological responses that form an adaptive stress response (Le et al., 2005). Stressors that stimulate GC release in wildlife can include parasitism, disturbance, reduction in habitat quality, predation, human hunting pressure and climate change (Kunkel and Pletscher, 2000; Chapman et al., 2006; Lankester, 2010; Wasser et al., 2011; Jaimez et al., 2012; Mislan et al., 2016). Acute stress is an immediate adaptive response to adverse stimuli with short-term physiological effects, but chronic or repeated activation of the stress response can be maladaptive and negatively affect growth, reproduction and cognitive ability, increase catabolism of stored energy and depress immune activity (Boonstra et al., 1998; Sapolsky et al., 2000; Kitaysky et al., 2003; Charmandari et al., 2005; Macbeth et al., 2010).
Measurement of circulating GC in wildlife can be invasive (e.g. capture and restraint), which can initiate the stress response and alter GC levels (Kersey and Dehnhard, 2014). Minimally invasive methods of GC quantification often use feces, urine, feathers and hair as alternatives (Lafferty et al., 2015; Carlsson et al., 2016; Dantzer et al., 2016; Di Francesco et al., 2017; Seeber et al., 2018). Quantification of fecal GCs has been conducted on a wide range of taxa and provides a measure of stress during the time of gut passage (Bonier et al., 2004; Schwarzenberger, 2007; Kersey and Dehnhard, 2014; Rolland et al., 2017). Cortisol is incorporated into hair during growth, and hair cortisol concentration (HCC) is advantageous for examining chronic stress as it provides a long-term record of stress (e.g. weeks to months) without the need for repeated sampling (Sheriff et al., 2011; Meyer and Novak, 2012). HCC has been analyzed in numerous mammals, but fewer studies examine the relationship between HCC and body condition (Mislan et al., 2016; Di Francesco et al., 2017; Ewacha et al., 2017; Heimbürge et al., 2019).
Body condition can be assessed using a variety of morphological or physiological indices, including internal or external fat repositories and measurements, such as mass or size (Cattet, 1990; Stephenson et al., 1998; Labocha and Hayes, 2012; Risco et al., 2018). Another commonly used method to assess body condition in large mammals is marrow lipids (Neiland, 1970; Mech, 2007; Yamanaka et al., 2011; Borowik et al., 2016). Marrow lipids are the last energy stores to be metabolized in times of food shortage, and low marrow lipid percentage (10–30%) is indicative of poor body condition (Cheatum, 1949; Raglus et al., 2019). The marrow core in nutritionally stressed individuals appears gelatinous and/or red or yellow due to higher water content, low red blood cell formation and anemia (Cheatum, 1949). Poor body condition can result from low food quality, reproduction, parasitism and environmental factors such as winter severity (Delgiudice et al., 2001; Tollefson et al., 2010; Debeffe et al., 2016; Gardner et al., 2016). In turn, prey body condition, in addition to age, sex and encounter rates, can influence vulnerability to predation (Huggard, 1993b, 1993c). Animals killed by predation may have less marrow fat than the same species killed by car accidents (Mech, 2007) or human-harvests (Sand et al., 2012).
Understanding the relationship between ungulate stress response and body condition, using HCC and marrow lipid content as bioindicators, respectively, can be useful for assessing environmental stressors affecting population status. Negative correlations between GC concentrations, body condition and immunocompetence are common across taxa (Boonstra, 2004; Rich and Romero, 2005; Charbonnel et al., 2007; Mislan et al., 2016). Consequently, the combined effect of low reproductive output, poor body condition and reduced immunocompetence of individuals in a population, as a result of chronic stress, may impact population viability (Boonstra et al., 1998; Mumby et al., 2015).
We evaluated the link between chronic stress, body condition and vulnerability to predation by gray wolves (Canis lupus) in bison (Bison bison bison), moose (Alces alces) and white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) in Prince Albert National Park (PANP), Saskatchewan, Canada. The Sturgeon River plains bison (SRPB) population in PANP is one of only a few wild populations of plains bison in their historical range in Canada and has experienced a decline of around 50% since 2005 (Merkle et al., 2015). Therefore, we examined how stress and body condition may be increasing bison vulnerability to predation. We used prey HCC and marrow lipids as bioindicators of chronic stress and body condition, respectively. We hypothesized that chronic stress levels would differ based on the cause of mortality. We tested this hypothesis by comparing HCC collected from human-harvested versus wolf-killed bison. We predicted that wolf-killed bison would have elevated HCC, as chronic stress would increase vulnerability of bison to predation. We also hypothesized that HCC would predict body condition of ungulates killed by wolves, when accounting for environmental factors and age class of prey. We predicted that there would be a negative correlation between HCC and marrow lipid content in wolf-killed ungulates.
Methods
Study area
Our study area was in the southwest corner of PANP (centered at 53.7246° N, 106.6754° W; Fig. 1). This area is characterized by aspen parkland and remnant native fescue grassland in the south, boreal forest in the north and agricultural land outside of PANP to the west. The upland areas are dominated by trembling aspen (Populus tremuloides), white spruce (Picea glauca) and jack pine (Pinus banksiana), and the lowland areas are dominated by black spruce (Picea mariana) and larch (Larix laracina; Fortin et al., 2002). The area has long, cold winters (daily mean temperature for January: −16.5°C) and short, warm summers (daily mean temperature for July: +17.7°C) and receives an average of 450 mm of annual precipitation, the majority of which falls as rain.
Figure 1.

Map of PANP, Saskatchewan with our study area indicated by the red ellipse.
Sample collection
We used wolf Global Positioning System-collar data on two wolf packs to track and identify kill sites where bison (n = 20), moose (n = 11) and deer (n = 27) samples were collected. We identified kill sites using a rule-based algorithm programmed in Python TM language (Python Software, Hampton, NH, USA; Knopff et al., 2009) that identified clusters of GPS points that were geographically within 300 m and temporally within 4 days of each other (Sand et al., 2005). Kill sites were visited in November to March from 2013 to 2017. We used skeletal or hair remains from prey carcasses to identify species and sex–age class (young of year, yearling or adult). Remains of prey that we could not sex in the field were sexed using DNA extraction and single-locus analysis at Wildlife Genetics International (Nelson, BC, Canada) from ~50 mg of muscle sample. A 10–12 cm section from the middle of the femur was cut using a handsaw for marrow lipid analysis. Hair samples for cortisol analysis were collected by plucking from the prey carcass or from clumps of hair on the ground at the kill site.
Hair samples from bison (n = 23) were also collected during legal harvesting events that occurred outside of PANP (Bergeson, 1993). At the harvest location, we collected hair and muscle tissue samples and determined the age and sex of bison using the horns and teeth (Fuller, 1959). We collected samples during late summer to late autumn from 2013 to 2015, when most harvests occur as bison are more likely to leave PANP to graze on agronomic plants (Sigaud et al., 2017). All samples were stored frozen (−20°C) until analysis.
Marrow lipid analysis
We determined marrow lipid content for animals killed by wolves by scooping marrow out of a cross-sectional cut and discarding any exposed surface, which may have been subject to oxidation during storage. We quantitatively extracted the marrow lipid using a modified Folch extraction (Folch et al., 1957; Iverson et al., 2001), with a 2:1 chloroform-methanol (Chl:MeOH) solution and 0.1 mg/ml butylated hydroxytoluene to prevent oxidation. Marrow lipid content was expressed as the percent of total sample wet weight.
HCC analysis
We used guard hairs for cortisol analysis as there is less variation among and within body regions in comparison to underfur (Macbeth et al., 2010). Bison, moose and deer undergo an annual moult in the spring, after which the winter coat of underfur and overlying guard hair is grown over the summer to late autumn (Peterson, 1978; Meagher, 1986). Guard hairs reflect cortisol levels during the summer and autumn before sample collection, as cortisol is integrated during hair growth. Surface contaminants on hair (e.g. blood, urine, feces, etc.) may contain cortisol and can confound HCC analysis (Macbeth et al., 2010; Cattet et al., 2014). We removed surface contaminants from hair by performing two 3-min methanol washes (0.1 ml of methanol/mg hair) per sample and drying the samples underneath a fume hood for 2 days. Hair was ground to a fine powder, and HCC was extracted and analyzed at the Veterinary Biomedical Centre (University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada) following Macbeth et al. (2010). We conducted assay validation on bison samples, as this is the first record (that we know of) of HCC analysis for this species. The cortisol extraction efficiency was >95% (Macbeth et al., 2010). Parallelism between serially diluted bison hair extracts and standard cortisol concentrations was observed (R2 = 0.994, P = 0.19). The intra-assay coefficient of variability (n = 6) was 9.36% and the inter-assay coefficient of variability (n = 12) was 11.78%.
HCCs of wolf-killed versus human-harvested bison
We examined the difference between HCC (log-transformed) of wolf-killed and human-harvested bison. We tested assumptions of normality and homogeneity of variance of our transformed data, and we used a t-test to examine the HCC of wolf-killed or human-harvested bison if assumptions were not violated. We compared a series of linear mixed effects models to determine which factors best predicted HCC in bison. Variables in our models included mortality source (wolf-killed or human-harvested), age (young of year, yearling and adult) and sex of bison. We included an interaction term between age and sex, and year as a random effect. Because all of our models were nested, we used likelihood-ratio tests (LRTs) to examine whether the more complex model was justified by the reduction in likelihood.
Factors affecting prey body condition
We examined the relationship between marrow lipid content and HCC in prey samples from wolf kill sites. We used generalized linear mixed effects models to examine the relationship, using a binomial family for our models and a log-odds link function. We included the variables HCC, species, sex, mean snow depth from the 2 weeks before sample collection and mean low temperature from the 2 weeks before sample collection. We included year and site as a random effect, to account for variation between years and wolf packs. We used Spearman’s test of correlation to determine and exclude highly correlated variables (r2 > 0.60). Since all of our models were nested, we used LRTs to examine whether the more complex model was justified by the reduction in likelihood and accounted for the error associated with multiple comparisons using a Bonferroni correction (Bland and Altman, 1995; Cabin and Mitchell, 2000). All analyses were conducted in R (R Core Team, 2017) using the package lme4 (Bates et al., 2014) with an alpha (α) value of 0.05.
Results
HCCs of wolf-killed versus human-harvested bison
The transformed data followed a normal distribution (Shapiro–Wilk test: W = 0.96, P > 0.05) and had equal variance across samples (Bartlett test: K2 = 1.31, P > 0.05), so we used a t-test to compare HCC of wolf-killed (n = 20) to harvested bison (n = 23). HCC was significantly higher in wolf-killed bison (Fig. 2; two-sample t-test: t = 8.36, P < 0.001). We constructed four different models of varying complexity to explain HCC, including the null model (Table 1). Source of mortality (human-harvested versus wolf-killed) was the best predictor of HCC in bison (LRT: D = 7.86, P < 0.01; Table 2). Males had elevated HCC in both harvested and wolf-killed bison, but sex and age variables were not significant.
Figure 2.

Comparison of HCCs between human-harvested (n = 23) and wolf-killed (n = 20) plains bison. Mean values (± SE) are shown for each group. Samples from wolf-killed bison were collected at wolf kill sites visited from November to March in 2013 to 2017 in the SW corner of PANP, Saskatchewan. Samples from human-harvested bison were collected from harvest events that occurred outside of the park from August to November in 2013 to 2016
Table 1.
Linear mixed effects models used to investigate factors affecting HCC for plains bison in PANP, Saskatchewan
| Model number | Model description |
|---|---|
| 1 | HCC ~ 1+ (1|year) |
| 2 | HCC ~ mortality source + (1|year) |
| 3 | HCC ~ mortality source + age + (1|year) |
| 4 | HCC ~ mortality source + age + sex + (1|year) |
| 5 | HCC ~ mortality source + age + sex + age:sex + (1|year) |
Variables included in the most complex model are mortality source (human-harvested or wolf-killed), age, sex and an interaction between age and sex, with the simplest model being the null model. All models included a random effect of year.
Table 2.
LRTs of linear mixed effects models used to investigate the relationship between HCC and mortality source, age and sex of plains bison in PANP, Saskatchewan, using an alpha (α) = 0.05
| Models compared | D | df | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 vs 2 | 7.86 | 1 | <0.01 |
| 2 vs 3 | 1.26 | 1 | >0.05 |
| 3 vs 4 | 0.08 | 1 | >0.05 |
| 4 vs 5 | 0.95 | 1 | >0.05 |
If P < α then the more complex model was justified by the reduction in likelihood.
Factors affecting prey body condition
HCC and marrow lipids ranged from ¯ = 6.2 ± 1.5 to 9.1 ± 1.3 pg/mg and ¯ = 55.3 ± 9.1 to 77.2 ± 4.1%, respectively, between species (Table 3). We constructed five models of varying complexity to explain marrow lipids, including the null model, and we included site and year as random effects to account for variation between wolf packs and years (Table 4). Mean snow depth and mean minimum temperature were negatively correlated (Spearman’s correlation: r2 = −0.64, S = 38 535, P < 0.001), so we used snow depth as a measure of winter severity. We found that the addition of all variables (HCC, species, sex and snow depth) significantly added to the fit of the models, with species explaining the least in regards to marrow lipid content (Table 5). Bison displayed the strongest negative correlation between HCC and marrow lipid percentage (Pearson correlation: r2 = 0.31; Fig. 3). Females had on average higher marrow lipid content than males, and marrow lipid content decreased with increasing snow depth.
Table 3.
Ranges of HCCs and marrow lipids measured from hair and femur samples, respectively, from wolf-killed bison, deer and moose collected during the winter from 2013 to 2017 in PANP, Saskatchewan
| Species | Hair cortisol concentration (Mean ¯ pg/mg ± SE) | Marrow lipid content (Mean ¯ % ± SE) |
|---|---|---|
| Bison | 6.15 ± 1.46 | 74.57 ± 6.34 |
| Deer | 6.81 ± 0.48 | 77.22 ± 4.09 |
| Moose | 9.11 ± 1.25 | 55.27 ± 9.05 |
Table 4.
Generalized linear mixed effects models used to investigate factors affecting body condition for bison, moose and deer killed by wolves in PANP, Saskatchewan
| Model number | Model description |
|---|---|
| 1 | % Marrow lipid ~ 1 + (1|site) + (1|year) |
| 2 | % Marrow lipid ~ HCC + (1|site) + (1|year) |
| 3 | % Marrow lipid ~ HCC + species + (1|site) + (1|year) |
| 4 | % Marrow lipid ~ HCC + species + sex + (1|site) + (1|year) |
| 5 | % Marrow lipid ~ HCC + species + sex + snow depth + (1|site) + (1|year) |
Variables included in the most complex model are HCC, species, sex and snow depth, with the simplest model being the null model. All models included a random effect of site (i.e. wolf pack) and year.
Table 5.
LRTs of generalized linear mixed effects models used to investigate the relationship between marrow lipid content and HCC of bison, moose and deer in PANP, Saskatchewan, using an alpha (α) = 0.05
| Models compared | D | df | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 vs 2 | 53.40 | 1 | <0.001 |
| 2 vs 3 | 22.35 | 1 | <0.001 |
| 3 vs 4 | 62.77 | 1 | <0.001 |
| 4 vs 5 | 28.53 | 1 | <0.001 |
If P < α then the more complex model was justified by the reduction in likelihood.
Figure 3.

Linear regressions examining the relationship between marrow lipid percentage and HCC for wolf-killed bison (n = 14), moose (n = 11) and deer (n = 27). Hair and bone marrow samples were collected from wolf kill sites visited from November to March in 2013 to 2017 in PANP, Saskatchewan
Discussion
Wolf-killed bison had significantly higher HCC than human-harvested bison, and mortality source was the best predictor of HCC in bison. The range of HCC in bison is comparable to other taxa (Di Francesco et al., 2017). There is considerable inter-individual variation in HCC within a species, which may indicate the health status of individuals (Lafferty et al., 2015; Caslini et al., 2016). Because most hair samples were collected from wolf-killed animals, we were unable to sample the same body region on each individual, as it was dependent on prey remains. HCC can vary between body regions (Sharpley et al., 2010; Terwissen et al., 2013; Carlitz et al., 2015), but we would expect our range of HCC to be larger if this was biasing our results. Marrow lipid analysis provided information over the autumn and winter, based on the period of sample collection, whereas HCC provided measurement of stress over the summer and autumn, based on hair growth in ungulates. While the measurement period of each bioindicator differed, both quantify stress and body condition over weeks to months. Ideally, stress and body condition would be analyzed concurrently to better examine a finer scale relationship between the two variables.
Chronic stress can result in adverse physiological responses, and individuals with high circulating GC concentrations may experience muscle wasting, immunosuppression, a decrease in reproductive ability, growth suppression and reduced body condition (Boonstra and Singleton, 1993; Boonstra et al., 1998; Charbonnel et al., 2007). However, few studies have identified the effects of chronic stress on the fitness of free-ranging animals, and high levels of circulating GC do not necessarily indicate a stress response or that an animal is in poor health (Beehner and Bergman, 2017). Although baseline GC levels can estimate the relative fitness of individuals, the relationship varies between species, within populations and at different life stages (Bonier et al., 2009). We found the strongest negative relationship between HCC and marrow lipid content in bison, with little to no relationship in moose or deer. Such differences across taxa are common (Charbonnel et al., 2007; Mislan et al., 2016; Rakotoniaina et al., 2017; Wolf et al., 2018).
Wolves often select prey that are less fit, including young, old, diseased and injured individuals (Huggard, 1993c; Mech and Peterson, 2003; Garrott et al., 2007). Prey that are consumed by wolves may have elevated cortisol and low marrow lipid content, because it is easier for wolves to chase, subdue and kill weaker prey (Smith et al., 2000; Husseman et al., 2003). Vulnerability associated with poor body condition may be particularly important for prey such as bison, because the risk of injury to wolves is higher during predation events with bison compared to other ungulates (Huggard, 1993c; MacNulty, 2002; Tallian et al., 2017). Studies on other predators found that individual kill rate was negatively correlated with prey body condition (Mattisson et al., 2017), indicating that the body condition of prey may help to predict predator success rate.
It is difficult to distinguish if poor body condition causes an increase in circulating GC or if chronic stress causes a decrease in body condition. Animals in poor body condition may exhibit elevated GC concentrations as they must metabolize protein, rather than fat, for energy, resulting in the catabolism of muscle tissue (Cherel et al., 1988; Heath et al., 1998). Alternatively, experimentally increasing GC concentrations can adversely affect body condition and lead to muscle wasting (Boonstra, 2004; Rich and Romero, 2005; Charbonnel et al., 2007). Therefore, the effects of chronic stress and body condition on each other are most likely correlated and bidirectional.
Environmental factors that affect cortisol levels and body condition of ungulates include parasites, disease, reproductive output, disturbance, habitat quality, weather, climate, starvation and/or injury. Body condition can be negatively related to parasite infection, although the effect size is variable (Carlsson et al., 2016; Sánchez et al., 2018). We did not examine the effect of parasites on body condition on ungulates in our study area, although there was an outbreak of anthrax due to Bacillus anthracis that killed 28 bison in our study area in 2008 (Shury et al., 2009). Human disturbance and a reduction in habitat quality can increase GC concentrations in free-ranging wildlife (Boonstra et al., 1998; Creel et al., 2002; Ewacha et al., 2017). Our study area was located in a relatively remote area of a national park, so sustained human disturbance and habitat degradation was minimal. Hiking trails and roads in our study area, as well as human disturbance (vehicle traffic and hazing off of agricultural land) when animals ranged outside of PANP, may have initiated an acute stress response in individuals (Fortin and Andruskiw, 2003). Severe weather, such as prolonged, cold winters can decrease forage quality for ungulates and result in poor body condition late in the winter (Cederlund et al., 1991; Delgiudice et al. 2001). We found that deeper snow was correlated with reduced marrow lipid content. Deep snow (>70 cm) can inhibit ungulate movement, restricting access to forage and increasing energetic output, which can lead to malnutrition and starvation (Kelsall, 1969; Sweeney and Sweeney, 1984; Telfer and Kelsall, 1984; Huggard, 1993a). Overall, there are varying effects of seasonality on cortisol and body condition, which may be related to behavioural and environmental differences, such as offspring care and protection, food availability and temperature (Mislan et al., 2016; Uetake et al., 2018; Heimbürge et al., 2019). Future studies should consider sectioning ungulate hair samples to examine temporal differences in HCC over the growing period.
Sex and age can influence body condition and to a lesser extent chronic stress, although the effects of both vary between and within species (Macbeth et al., 2012; Caslini et al., 2016; Mislan et al., 2016; Di Francesco et al., 2017; Prandi et al., 2018). Sex may interact with other factors, such as reproductive status and sexual dimorphism, to influence body condition and chronic stress levels (Lafferty et al., 2015; Mislan et al., 2016). Male bison had elevated HCC and were in poorer body condition compared to females, but the results were not significant for HCC. GC concentrations may peak during the breeding season of ungulates, when there is an increase in the number of agonistic encounters between males (Reyes et al., 1997; Romero and Butler, 2007; Pavitt et al., 2015), which overlapped with HCC measurements in our study (late summer to autumn).
Our results identify a potential link between body condition and chronic stress, particularly in wolf-killed bison, that suggests wolves may be killing prey in poorer condition. Larger sample sizes may have better represented the potential variation of cortisol and marrow lipids among individuals. In addition, incorporating HCC results from harvested deer and elk may have strengthened the relationship between HCC and mortality source (harvested and wolf-killed) among different species; however, we were lacking this data. Understanding the relationship between body condition/chronic stress and environmental stressors may allow managers to reduce harvest rates during and after years when prey condition is expected to be low. It may also provide information on expected predator success, which can be used to predict predator population dynamics. Finally, the lower HCC observed in human-harvested bison, relative to wolf-killed bison, suggests that hunting may have relatively larger impacts on population dynamics, as hunters appear to remove healthier individuals that are more likely to survive and reproduce successfully.
Acknowledgements
We thank Parks Canada and PANP staff for their support of this project, including N. Stolle, T. Stene, D. Guedo, D. Thompson and J. Watson. We also thank C. Irvine, M. Sigaud, J. Curran, E. Knight, B. Godden, M. Kennedy, K. Young, M. Ottway, E. Kanak, J. Cormack, T. Connolly, M. Peterson and M. Jacklin for assistance during field work. C. Debets provided assistance with marrow lipid extractions.
Funding
This work was supported by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada Discovery grant to A.E.D.; the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada Graduate Scholarship-Master’s Program to J.R.S.; PANP; and the Parks Canada Agency Conservation and Restoration Program.
References
- Bates D, Mächler M, Bolker B, Walker S (2014) Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. R Package 1.1-8 J Stat Softw 67: 1–48. [Google Scholar]
- Beehner JC, Bergman TJ (2017) The next step for stress research in primates: to identify relationships between glucocorticoid secretion and fitness. Horm Behav 91: 68–83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bergeson D. (1993) A comparative assessment of management problems associated with the free-roaming bison in Prince Albert National Park (unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba [Google Scholar]
- Bland JM, Altman DG (1995) Multiple significance tests: the Bonferroni method. BMJ 310: 170. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bonier F, Martin PR, Moore IT, Wingfield JC (2009) Do baseline glucocorticoids predict fitness? Trends Ecol Evol 24: 634–642. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bonier F, Quigley H, Austad SN (2004) A technique for non-invasively detecting stress response in cougars. Wildl Soc Bull 32: 711–717. [Google Scholar]
- Boonstra R. (2004) Coping with changing northern environments: the role of the stress axis in birds and mammals. Integr Comp Biol 44: 95–108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Boonstra R, Hik D, Singleton GR, Tinnikov A (1998) The impact of predator-induced stress on the snowshoe hare cycle. Ecol Monogr 68: 371–394. [Google Scholar]
- Boonstra R, Singleton G (1993) Population declines in the snowshoe hare and the role of stress. Gen Comp Endocrinol 91: 126–143. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Borowik T, Wawrzyniak P, Jędrzejewska B (2016) Red deer (Cervus elaphus) fertility and survival of young in a low-density population subject to predation and hunting. J Mammal 97: 1671–1681. [Google Scholar]
- Cabin RJ, Mitchell RJ (2000) To Bonferroni or not to Bonferroni: when and how are the questions? Bull Ecol Soc Am 81: 246–248. [Google Scholar]
- Carlitz EH, Kirschbaum C, Miller R, Rukundo J, van Schaik CP (2015) Effects of body region and time on hair cortisol concentrations in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Gen Comp Endocrinol 223: 9–15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Carlsson A, Mastromonaco G, Vandervalk E, Kutz S (2016) Parasites, stress and reindeer: infection with abomasal nematodes is not associated with elevated glucocorticoid levels in hair or faeces. Conserv Physiol 4: doi:10.1093/conphys/cow058. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Caslini C, Comin A, Peric T, Prandi A, Pedrotti L, Mattiello S (2016) Use of hair cortisol analysis for comparing population status in wild red deer (Cervus elaphus) living in areas with different characteristics. Eur J Wildl Res 62: 713–723. [Google Scholar]
- Cattet M. (1990) Predicting nutritional condition in black bears and polar bears on the basis of morphological and physiological measurements. Can J Zool 68: 32–39. [Google Scholar]
- Cattet M, Macbeth BJ, Janz DM, Zedrosser A, Swenson JE, Dumond M, Stenhouse GB (2014) Quantifying long-term stress in brown bears with the hair cortisol concentration: a biomarker that may be confounded by rapid changes in response to capture and handling. Conserv Physiol 2: doi:10.1093/conphys/cou026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cederlund GN, Sand HK, Pehrson Å (1991) Body mass dynamics of moose calves in relation to winter severity. J Wildl Manage 55: 675–681. [Google Scholar]
- Chapman CA, Wasserman MD, Gillespie TR, Speirs ML, Lawes MJ, Saj TL, Ziegler TE (2006) Do food availability, parasitism, and stress have synergistic effects on red colobus populations living in forest fragments? Am J Phys Anthropol 131: 525–534. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Charbonnel N, Chaval Y, Berthier K, Deter J, Morand S, Palme R, Cosson JF (2007) Stress and demographic decline: a potential effect mediated by impairment of reproduction and immune function in cyclic vole populations. Physiol Biochem Zool 81: 63–73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Charmandari E, Tsigos C, Chrousos G (2005) Endocrinology of the stress response. Annu Rev Physiol 67: 259–284. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cheatum E. (1949) Bone marrow as an index of malnutrition in deer. NY State Conserv 3: 19–22. [Google Scholar]
- Cherel Y, Robin J-P, Maho YL (1988) Physiology and biochemistry of long-term fasting in birds. Can J Zool 66: 159–166. [Google Scholar]
- Creel S, Fox JE, Hardy A, Sands J, Garrott B, Peterson RO (2002) Snowmobile activity and glucocorticoid stress responses in wolves and elk. Conserv Biol 16: 809–814. [Google Scholar]
- Creel S, Winnie JA, Christianson D (2009) Glucocorticoid stress hormones and the effect of predation risk on elk reproduction. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106: 12388–12393. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dantzer B, Santicchia F, van Kesteren F, Palme R, Martinoli A, Wauters LA (2016) Measurement of fecal glucocorticoid metabolite levels in Eurasian red squirrels (Sciurus vulgaris): effects of captivity, sex, reproductive condition, and season. J Mammal 97: 1385–1398. [Google Scholar]
- Debeffe L, Mcloughlin PD, Medill SA, Stewart K, Andres D, Shury T, Wagner B, Jenkins E, Gilleard JS, Poissant J (2016) Negative covariance between parasite load and body condition in a population of feral horses. Parasitology 143: 983–997. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Delgiudice GD, Moen RA, Singer FJ, Riggs MR (2001) Winter nutritional restriction and simulated body condition of Yellowstone elk and bison before and after the fires of 1988. Wildl Monogr 147: 1–60. [Google Scholar]
- Di Francesco J, Navarro-Gonzalez N, Wynne-Edwards K, Peacock S, Leclerc L-M, Tomaselli M, Davison T, Carlsson A, Kutz S (2017) Qiviut cortisol in muskoxen as a potential tool for informing conservation strategies. Conserv Physiol 5: doi:10.1093/conphys/cox052. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ewacha MV, Roth JD, Anderson WG, Brannen DC, Dupont DL (2017) Disturbance and chronic levels of cortisol in boreal woodland caribou. J Wildl Manage 81: 1266–1275. [Google Scholar]
- Folch J, Lees M, Sloane SG (1957) A simple method for the isolation and purification of total lipids from animal tissues. J Biol Chem 226: 497–509. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fortin D, Fryxell JM, Pilote R (2002) The temporal scale of foraging decisions in bison. Ecology 83: 970–982. [Google Scholar]
- Fortin D, Andruskiw M (2003) Behavioral response of free-ranging bison to human disturbance. Wildl Soc Bull 31: 804–813. [Google Scholar]
- Fuller WA. (1959) The horns and teeth as indicators of age in bison. J Wildl Manage 23: 342–344. [Google Scholar]
- Gardner JL, Amano T, Sutherland WJ, Clayton M, Peters A (2016) Individual and demographic consequences of reduced body condition following repeated exposure to high temperatures. Ecology 97: 786–795. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Garrott RA, Bruggeman JE, Becker MS, Kalinowski ST, White P (2007) Evaluating prey switching in wolf–ungulate systems. Ecol Appl 17: 1588–1597. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Heath JA, Dufty J, Alfred M (1998) Body condition and the adrenal stress response in captive American kestrel juveniles. Physiol Zool 71: 67–73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Heimbürge S, Kanitz E, Otten W (2019) The use of hair cortisol for the assessment of stress in animals. Gen Comp Endocrinol 270: 10–17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Huggard DJ. (1993a) Effect of snow depth on predation and scavenging by gray wolves. J Wildl Manage 57: 382–388. [Google Scholar]
- Huggard DJ. (1993b) Prey selectivity of wolves in Banff national park. i. Prey species. Can J Zool 71: 130–139. [Google Scholar]
- Huggard DJ. (1993c) Prey selectivity of wolves in Banff national park. ii. Age, sex, and condition of elk. Can J Zool 71: 140–147. [Google Scholar]
- Husseman JS, Murray DL, Power G, Mack C, Wenger C, Quigley H (2003) Assessing differential prey selection patterns between two sympatric large carnivores. Oikos 101: 591–601. [Google Scholar]
- Iverson SJ, Lang SL, Cooper MH (2001) Comparison of the Bligh and Dyer and Folch methods for total lipid determination in a broad range of marine tissue. Lipids 36: 1283–1287. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jaimez N, Bribiescas R, Aronsen G, Anestis S, Watts D (2012) Urinary cortisol levels of gray-cheeked mangabeys are higher in disturbed compared to undisturbed forest areas in Kibale National Park, Uganda. Anim Conserv 15: 242–247. [Google Scholar]
- Kelsall JP. (1969) Structural adaptations of moose and deer for snow. J Mammal 50: 302–310. [Google Scholar]
- Kersey DC, Dehnhard M (2014) The use of noninvasive and minimally invasive methods in endocrinology for threatened mammalian species conservation. Gen Comp Endocrinol 203: 296–306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kitaysky A, Kitaiskaia E, Piatt J, Wingfield J (2003) Benefits and costs of increased levels of corticosterone in seabird chicks. Horm Behav 43: 140–149. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Knopff KH, Knopff AA, Warren MB, Boyce MS (2009) Evaluating global positioning system telemetry techniques for estimating cougar predation parameters. J Wildl Manage 73: 586–597. [Google Scholar]
- Kunkel KE, Pletscher DH (2000) Habitat factors affecting vulnerability of moose to predation by wolves in southeastern British Columbia. Can J Zool 78: 150–157. [Google Scholar]
- Labocha MK, Hayes JP (2012) Morphometric indices of body condition in birds: a review. J Ornithol 153: 1–22. [Google Scholar]
- Lafferty DJ, Laudenslager ML, Mowat G, Heard D, Belant JL (2015) Sex, diet, and the social environment: factors influencing hair cortisol concentration in free-ranging black bears (Ursus americanus). Plos One 10: e0141489. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lankester MW. (2010) Understanding the impact of meningeal worm, Parelaphostrongylus tenuis, on moose populations. Alces 46: 53–70. [Google Scholar]
- Le PP, Friedman JR, Schug J, Brestelli JE, Parker JB, Bochkis IM, Kaestner KH (2005) Glucocorticoid receptor-dependent gene regulatory networks. PLoS Genet 1: e16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Macbeth B, Cattet M, Stenhouse G, Gibeau M, Janz D (2010) Hair cortisol concentration as a noninvasive measure of long-term stress in free-ranging grizzly bears (Ursus arctos): considerations with implications for other wildlife. Can J Zool 88: 935–949. [Google Scholar]
- Macbeth BJ, Cattet MR, Obbard ME, Middel K, Janz DM (2012) Evaluation of hair cortisol concentration as a biomarker of long-term stress in free-ranging polar bears. Wildl Soc Bull 36: 747–758. [Google Scholar]
- MacNulty DR. (2002) The predatory sequence and the influence of injury risk on hunting behavior in the wolf (unpublished master’s thesis). University of Minnesota Saint Paul, Minnesota, USA. [Google Scholar]
- Mattisson J, Rauset GR, Odden J, Andrén H, Linnell JD, Persson J (2017) Predation or scavenging? Prey body condition influences decision-making in a facultative predator, the wolverine. Bull Ecol Soc Am 98: 40–46. [Google Scholar]
- McEwen BS. (1998) Stress, adaptation, and disease: allostasis and allostatic load. Ann N Y Acad Sci 840: 33–44. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Meagher M. (1986) Bison bison. Mamm Species 266: 1–8. [Google Scholar]
- Mech LD. (2007) Femur-marrow fat of white-tailed deer fawns killed by wolves. J Wildl Manage 71: 920–923. [Google Scholar]
- Mech LD, Peterson RO (2003) Wolf-prey relations In Mech LD, Boitani L, eds, Wolves: Behavior, Ecology, and Conservation. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 131–160. [Google Scholar]
- Merkle JA, Sigaud M, Fortin D (2015) To follow or not? How animals in fusion-fission societies handle conflicting information during group decision-making. Ecol Lett 18: 799–806. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Meyer JS, Novak MA (2012) Mini review: hair cortisol: a novel biomarker of hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenocortical activity. Endocrinology 153: 4120–4127. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mislan P, Derocher AE, Louis VLS, Richardson E, Lunn NJ, Janz DM (2016) Assessing stress in western Hudson Bay polar bears using hair cortisol concentration as a biomarker. Ecol Indic 71: 47–54. [Google Scholar]
- Mumby HS, Mar KU, Thitaram C, Courtiol A, Towiboon P, Min-Oo Z, Htut-Aung Y, Brown JL, Lummaa V (2015) Stress and body condition are associated with climate and demography in Asian elephants. Conserv Physiol 3: doi:10.1093/conphys/cov030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Neiland KA. (1970) Weight of dried marrow as indicator of fat in caribou femurs. J Wildl Manage 34: 904–907. [Google Scholar]
- Pavitt AT, Walling CA, Möstl E, Pemberton JM, Kruuk LE (2015) Cortisol but not testosterone is repeatable and varies with reproductive effort in wild red deer stags. Gen Comp Endocrinol 222: 62–68. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Peterson RL. (1978) North American Moose. University of Toronto Press, Toronto. [Google Scholar]
- Prandi A, Peric T, Corazzin M, Comin A, Colitti M (2018) A first survey on hair cortisol of an alpine ibex (Capra ibex ibex) population. Anim Sci Pap Rep 36: 57–74. [Google Scholar]
- R Core Team (2017) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R foundation for statistical computing, Vienna, Austria. [Google Scholar]
- Raglus TI, De Groef B, Rochfort S, Rawlin G, McCowan C (2019) Bone marrow fat analysis as a diagnostic tool to document ante-mortem starvation. Vet J 243: 1–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rakotoniaina JH, Kappeler PM, Kaesler E, Hämäläinen AM, Kirschbaum C, Kraus C (2017) Hair cortisol concentrations correlate negatively with survival in a wild primate population. BMC Ecol 17: 30. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Reyes E, Bubenik GA, Lobos A, Schams D, Bartos L (1997) Seasonal levels of cortisol, IGF-l and triiodothyronin in adult male pudu. Folia Zool 46: 109–116. [Google Scholar]
- Rich EL, Romero LM (2005) Exposure to chronic stress downregulates corticosterone responses to acute stressors. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 288: R1628–R1636. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Risco D, Gonçalves P, Mentaberre G, Navarro-González N, Casas-Díaz E, Gassó D, Colom-Cadena A, Fernández-Aguilar X, Castillo-Contreras R, Velarde R (2018) Biometrical measurements as efficient indicators to assess wild boar body condition. Ecol Indic 88: 43–50. [Google Scholar]
- Rolland RM, McLellan WA, Moore MJ, Harms CA, Burgess EA, Hunt KE (2017) Fecal glucocorticoids and anthropogenic injury and mortality in north Atlantic right whales Eubalaena glacialis. Endanger Species Res 34: 417–429. [Google Scholar]
- Romero ML, Butler LK (2007) Endocrinology of stress. Int J Comp Psychol 20: 89–95. [Google Scholar]
- Sánchez CA, Becker DJ, Teitelbaum CS, Barriga P, Brown LM, Majewska AA, Hall RJ, Altizer S (2018) On the relationship between body condition and parasite infection in wildlife: a review and meta-analysis. Ecol Lett 21: 1869–1884. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sand H, Wikenros C, Ahlqvist P, Strømseth TH, Wabakken P (2012) Comparing body condition of moose (Alces alces) selected by wolves (Canis lupus) and human hunters: consequences for the extent of compensatory mortality. Can J Zool 90: 403–412. [Google Scholar]
- Sand H, Zimmermann B, Wabakken P, Andrèn H, Pedersen HC (2005) Using GPS technology and GIS cluster analyses to estimate kill rates in wolf-ungulate ecosystems. Wildl Soc Bull 33: 914–925. [Google Scholar]
- Sapolsky RM, Romero LM, Munck AU (2000) How do glucocorticoids influence stress responses? Integrating permissive, suppressive, stimulatory, and preparative actions. Endocr Rev 21: 55–89. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schwarzenberger F. (2007) The many uses of non-invasive faecal steroid monitoring in zoo and wildlife species. Int Zoo Yearb 41: 52–74. [Google Scholar]
- Seeber P, Franz M, Dehnhard M, Ganswindt A, Greenwood A, East M (2018) Plains zebra (Equus quagga) adrenocortical activity increases during times of large aggregations in the Serengeti ecosystem. Horm Behav 102: 1–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sharpley CF, Kauter KG, McFarlane JR (2010) An investigation of hair cortisol concentration across body sites and within hair shaft. Clin Med Insights Endocrinol Diabetes 3: 17–23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sheriff MJ, Dantzer B, Delehanty B, Palme R, Boonstra R (2011) Measuring stress in wildlife: techniques for quantifying glucocorticoids. Oecologia 166: 869–887. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shury TK, Frandsen D, O’Brodovich L (2009) Anthrax in free-ranging bison in the Prince Albert National Park area of Saskatchewan in 2008. Can Vet J 50: 152–154. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sigaud M, Merkle JA, Cherry SG, Fryxell JM, Berdahl A, Fortin D (2017) Collective decision-making promotes fitness loss in a fusion-fission society. Ecol Lett 20: 33–40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Smith DW, Mech LD, Meagher M, Clark WE, Jaffe R, Phillips MK, Mack JA (2000) Wolf–bison interactions in Yellowstone National Park. J Mammal 81: 1128–1135. [Google Scholar]
- Stephenson TR, Hundertmark KJ, Schwartz CC, Ballenberghe VV (1998) Predicting body fat and body mass in moose with ultrasonography. Can J Zool 76: 717–722. [Google Scholar]
- Sweeney JM, Sweeney JR (1984) Snow depths influencing winter movements of elk. J Mammal 65: 524–526. [Google Scholar]
- Tallian A, Smith DW, Stahler DR, Metz MC, Wallen RL, Geremia C, Ruprecht J, Wyman CT, MacNulty DR (2017) Predator foraging response to a resurgent dangerous prey. Funct Ecol 31: 1418–1429. [Google Scholar]
- Telfer ES, Kelsall JP (1984) Adaptation of some large North American mammals for survival in snow. Ecology 65: 1828–1834. [Google Scholar]
- Terwissen C, Mastromonaco G, Murray D (2013) Influence of adrenocorticotrophin hormone challenge and external factors (age, sex, and body region) on hair cortisol concentration in Canada lynx (Lynx canadensis). Gen Comp Endocrinol 194: 162–167. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tollefson TN, Shipley LA, Myers WL, Keisler DH, Dasgupta N (2010) Influence of summer and autumn nutrition on body condition and reproduction in lactating mule deer. J Wildl Manage 74: 974–986. [Google Scholar]
- Uetake K, Morita S, Sakagami N, Yamamoto K, Hashimura S, Tanaka T (2018) Hair cortisol levels of lactating dairy cows in cold- and warm-temperate regions in Japan. Animal Sci J 89: 494–497. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wasser SK, Keim JL, Taper ML, Lele SR (2011) The influences of wolf predation, habitat loss, and human activity on caribou and moose in the Alberta oil sands. Front Ecol Environ 9: 546–551. [Google Scholar]
- Wolf TE, Valades GB, Simelane P, Bennett NC, Ganswindt A (2018) The relationship between physical injury, body condition and stress-related hormone concentrations in free-ranging giraffes. Wildl Biol 2018: 1–6. [Google Scholar]
- Yamanaka A, Asano M, Suzuki M, Mizoguchi T, Oi T, Shimozuru M, Tsubota T (2011) Evaluation of stored body fat in nuisance-killed Japanese black bears (Ursus thibetanus japonicus). Zoolog Sci 28: 105–111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
