Abstract
Scope
Distinct markers for mild vitamin B3 deficiency are lacking. To identify these, the molecular responses of white adipose tissue (WAT) to vitamin B3 withdrawal are examined.
Methods and results
A dietary intervention is performed in male C57BL/6JRccHsd mice, in which a diet without nicotinamide riboside (NR) is compared to a diet with NR at the recommended vitamin B3 level. Both diets contain low but adequate level of tryptophan. Metabolic flexibility and systemic glucose tolerance are analyzed and global transcriptomics, qRT‐PCR, and histology of epididymal WAT (eWAT) are performed. A decreased insulin sensitivity and a shift from carbohydrate to fatty acid oxidation in response to vitamin B3 withdrawal are observed. This is consistent with molecular changes in eWAT, including an activated MEK/ERK signaling, a lowering of glucose utilization markers, and an increase in makers of fatty acid catabolism, possibly related to the consistent lower expression of mitochondrial electron transport complexes. The synthesis pathway of tetrahydropteridine (BH4), an essential cofactor for neurotransmitter synthesis, is transcriptionally activated. Genes marking these processes are technically validated.
Conclusion
The downregulation of Anp32a, Tnk2 and the upregulation of Mapk1, Map2k1, Qdpr, Mthfs, and Mthfsl are proposed as a WAT transcriptional signature marker for mild vitamin B3 deficiency.
Keywords: biomarkers, deficiency, MEK/ERK, tetrahydropteridine, vitamin B3
1. Introduction
Vitamin B3 represents nicotinic acid, nicotinamide, nicotinamide mononucleotide, and nicotinamide riboside (NR), which are precursors of nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD+).1 NAD+ supports multiple essential cellular functions and is principally involved in redox reactions, as electron acceptor (NAD+) or donor (NADH).2
In mammals, NAD+ can also be synthesized from the essential amino acid tryptophan (Trp).3 Long‐term inadequate intake of vitamin B3 and Trp can lead to the development of Pellagra in humans. Pellagra has a number of unspecific symptoms, including lesions of the skin, soreness of tongue and mouth, diarrhoea, and dementia. Weakness and fatigue are early symptoms of this disease. Pellagra can ultimately result in death due to multi‐organ failure, when not treated.4 Rats fed a vitamin B3‐free and Trp‐limited diet can show a pellagra‐like phenotype.5, 6
In terms of contribution to NAD+ level, dietary Trp is equivalent to vitamin B3 in a ratio of approximately 1/60 in humans,7 while this ratio is slightly higher in mice.8 The conversion of Trp to NAD+ is dependent on Trp intake, since lower Trp intake prioritizes tryptophan for protein synthesis.9 Trp is also required for the biosynthesis of the neurotransmitter serotonin. In mice, 0.1% tryptophan in the diet is considered to be an adequate level of intake for normal growth.10, 11 A higher intake of Trp may negate the consequences of vitamin B3 deficiency. Indeed, mice fed a chow diet without vitamin B3, but with 0.23% Trp, were shown to maintain normal growth and a normal blood NAD(H) level.12, 13
In mice or in vitro, NAD+ deficiency has been successfully established through genetic manipulation or pharmaceutical intervention that aim to either disrupt NAD+ synthesis or regeneration,13, 14, 15 or to enhance NAD+ consumption.16, 17 These strategies generally cause severe NAD+ depletion and consequential physiological deterioration and provide important mechanistic insights, but are less human relevant since severe vitamin B3 deficiency is rare nowadays.4
The prevalence of mild vitamin B3 deficiency is, however, not well established, because clinical symptoms and physiological signs of vitamin B3 deficiency are relative unspecific.8 Possibly, molecular responses to vitamin B3 withdrawal in mice could be used to provide more specific markers for mild vitamin B3 deficiency, a condition that is likely more common in human than severe deficiency.4 Therefore, we aimed here to identify molecular responses to vitamin B3 withdrawal using global transcriptome analysis. We used NR as exclusive source of vitamin B3, as the optimal dietary level of this B3 vitamin has been established in mice and can be used as control.18 We focused on epididymal white adipose tissue (eWAT), since we previously established eWAT as an organ that is sensitive to especially low levels of NR,19 whereas effects of low NR were not seen in subcutaneous WAT, liver, or skeletal muscle (ref. 19 and unpublished data regarding the expression of energy metabolism genes for all three tissues and subcutaneous WAT adipocyte morphometry). Furthermore, diet‐induced obesity induces an NAD+ decline in eWAT.20 In addition, in vitro studies have indicated that adipocyte differentiation is affected by vitamin B3 exposure.21, 22 We performed a dietary intervention in male C57BL/6JRccHsd mice using a diet without NR and with NR at the recommended vitamin B3 level. To identify effects, a large influx of NAD+ from tryptophan had to be prevented and we therefore used a diet with a low, but adequate level of Trp (0.115%).
2. Experimental Section
2.1. Dosage Information
A semi‐synthetic diet (Table S1, Supporting Information) was employed, containing 40% energy from fat, 41% energy from carbohydrates, and 19% energy from proteins, with a low but sufficient amount of tryptophan (calculated 0.115% l‐tryptophan) and either 0 or 30 mg NR per kg diet as vitamin B3 source (referred to as No‐NR and Ctrl‐NR, respectively).
2.2. Animal Study
The animal experiment was ethically approved (DEC2016033b) and performed in full accordance with national and EU‐regulations. This independent experiment was performed as part of a larger experiment to reduce the number of (control) animals. C57BL/6JRccHsd male mice (Envigo, Horst, the Netherlands) were individually housed (12 h light–dark cycle, 23 ± 1 °C, 55 ± 15% humidity), with ad libitum access to feed and water, unless indicated otherwise. Nine‐week‐old mice were accustomed to the Ctrl‐NR diet for 2 weeks. Subsequently, mice were stratified based on their body weight into two experimental groups (n = 12 per group) and received the No‐NR or Ctrl‐NR diet for 18 weeks. Body parameters measurements, sample collection, and processing are in Methods, Supporting Information.
2.3. Metabolic Flexibility and Energy Expenditure
Indirect calorimetry was conducted in week 14 using a PhenoMaster System (TSE Systems, Bad Homburg, Germany), as described.19 Respiratory exchange ratio (RER) and energy expenditure (EE) were obtained using TSE software. Metabolic flexibility was assessed based on the change of RER in response to a fasting‐refeeding challenge as the incremental area under the RER curve (iAUC) between 16:00 h and 23:00 h, with the RER of each group at 16:00 h as baseline. The mean of EE of the fasted and the refeeding period were calculated. RER and EE were measured under the non‐challenged conditions before the fasting‐refeeding challenge.
2.4. Oral Glucose Tolerance Test
An oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) was performed in week 17, as described23 and detailed in Supporting Information Methods.
2.5. Circulating Parameters
Determination of circulating parameters and related calculations are in Methods, Supporting Information.
2.6. RNA Isolation
Total RNA was isolated from eWAT using Trizol combined with a RNeasy Mini kit (Qiagen, Venlo, the Netherlands), as described.24 RNA isolation from liver and soleus was done as published.19 RNA purity and yield were measured using Nanodrop (NanoDrop, Wilmington, USA) and RNA integrity was verified using TapeStation (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA).
2.7. Genome Wide Gene Expression
Two‐hundred nanograms RNA of each sample (n = 12 per group) was assayed using mouse whole genome 8 × 60 K microarrays (Agilent Technologies Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA), as published.25 Signals were extracted (Feature extraction 10.7.3.1., Agilent), quality controlled, and normalized as described.25 All microarray data are MIAME compliant and were stored in GEO (GSE116483). 26 384 probes (44.0% of total) were considered expressed (average expression >2× background). 4795 probes were differentially expressed with a Benjamini–Hochberg false discovery rate adjusted Student's t‐test p value of less than 0.5 (FDR < 0.5) and 368 probes were with FDR <0.2. Fold change is the ratio of mean expression of No‐NR over Ctrl‐NR. Probes with FDR <0.2 were used for the analysis of pathway maps and GO processes using MetaCore (Thomson Reuters, New York, USA). Genes enriched in the top 10 pathway maps were gathered and presented as a heatmap using GeneMaths XT (Applied Maths, Sint‐Martens‐Latem, Belgium). The top 30 down‐ and upregulated annotated genes with FDR <0.2 were annotated using public databases (MGI [www.informatics.jax.org], Nextprot [www.nexprot.org], and Pubmed [www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed]). From these, genes related to insulin sensitivity were selected and their net effect on insulin sensitivity was indicated, based on scientific literature (PubMed). Similarly, from the FDR < 0.2 dataset, genes related to tetrahydrobiopterin (BH4) synthesis were selected, supplemented with relevant FDR < 0.5 genes and their net effect on BH4 synthesis was indicated. Mitochondrial gene expression was separately interrogated. Nuclear encoded mitochondrial genes extracted from the mouse MitoCarta2.0 database (https://www.broadinstitute.org/files/shared/metabolism/mitocarta/mouse.mitocarta.2.0.html), and the distribution of down‐ and upregulated probes was analyzed for FDR < 0.5 and for FDR < 0.2. Pathway analysis using MetaCore was performed based on the subset of “mitochondrial genes,” in which we used FDR < 0.5 dataset to ensure a sufficient number of genes. The distribution of down‐ and upregulated probes for the top 10 pathway map was calculated.
2.8. qRT‐PCR Validation
cDNA synthesis and regular qRT‐PCR were performed as described.19 Gene expression was presented as fold change of expression value normalized by reference genes with the mean value of Ctrl‐NR at 1. Primer sequences are in Table S2, Supporting Information.
2.9. Immunohistochemistry
Fluorescence microscopy of glucose transporter type 4 (GLUT4/SLC2A4) was performed as described in Methods, Supporting Information. Adipocyte cell size as well as macrophages were measured as described,19 with minor modifications and details as in Methods, Supporting Information.
2.10. Western Blot
Levels of mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) complex proteins in eWAT were assessed by western blot using an OXPHOS antibody cocktail (Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA) with total protein expression (REVERT Total Protein Stain, LI‐COR, Lincoln, NE, USA) as control. Details are in Methods, Supporting Information.
2.11. Targeted NAD+ Metabolites Analysis
NAD+ metabolites were extracted from eWAT and liver and identified and quantified using LC‐MS as described in Methods, Supporting Information.
2.12. Statistics
Data are expressed as mean ± SEM for n = 10 to 12 mice and n = 6 to 8 for immunohistochemistry. Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism v5.04 (San Diego, CA, USA). Data were verified for normality using the D'Agostino and Pearson omnibus normality test and log transformed if needed. Statistical differences were analyzed using two‐way repeated measures ANOVA followed by Bonferroni post‐hoc analysis or Students’ t‐test. p values <0.05 were considered statistically significant.
3. Results
3.1. Body Parameters and Metabolic Flexibility
Since vitamin B3 deficiency can affect health, we monitored progression of body weight and composition as well as metabolic parameters. We compared No‐NR to Ctrl‐NR, unless indicated otherwise. No significant differences were observed over the 18 week period in body weight, lean mass, fat mass, and feed intake (Figure 1A–D). In line with this, no significant differences were seen in RER or EE under non‐challenged conditions (Figure S1, Supporting Information). Under fasting‐refeeding challenge conditions, the Ctrl‐NR animals tended to have a higher iAUC of RER (p = 0.061) (Figure 1E,G), suggesting that these animals were better able to switch from fatty acid oxidation (FAO) to carbohydrate oxidation (CHO) during the refeeding transition. No significant differences were seen in EE during the challenge test (Figure 1F,H). In the refed condition, glucose, triglycerides (TG), nonesterified fatty acids (NEFA), total cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, leptin, and adiponectin, exhibited comparable circulating levels between groups (Table 1). The serum serotonin level, which is associated with tryptophan metabolism, was not changed in No‐NR (Table 1).
Figure 1.

Whole body parameters and metabolic flexibility. A) Body weight, B) lean mass, C) fat mass, D) cumulative feed intake. E) Metabolic flexibility and F) EE in week 14. The challenge (1.8 g diet at 16.00 h) was given when the animals were fully fasted (on fatty acid oxidation) resulting in a switch to carbohydrate oxidation. The shaded area indicates the dark, active period. G) Metabolic flexibility was analyzed as incremental area under the RER curve (iAUC; baseline = mean of RER at 16:00 h) during the refeeding transition. H) Mean of EE for each period. Ctrl‐NR: open square with solid line or white bar. No‐NR: closed circle with black dashed line or black bar. Data as mean ± SEM, n = 11 to 12. Analysis with two‐way ANOVA for (A)–(F), (H) and Students’ t‐test for (G).
Table 1.
Circulating parameters
| Indicatorsa) | Ctrl‐NR | No‐NR | p valueb) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | SEM | Mean | SEM | ||
| Blood glucose [mmol L−1] | 5.9 | 0.2 | 5.7 | 0.2 | 0.290 |
| TG [mg dL−1] | 131.6 | 7.0 | 127.3 | 7.9 | 0.692 |
| NEFA [mmol L−1] | 1.1 | 0.1 | 1.1 | 0.1 | 0.906 |
| Total cholesterol [mg dL−1] | 134.8 | 9.9 | 137.9 | 7.7 | 0.808 |
| HDL cholesterol [mg dL−1] | 75.4 | 8.7 | 65.3 | 7.2 | 0.242 |
| LDL cholesterol [mg dL−1] | 43.9 | 6.2 | 52.2 | 7.1 | 0.399 |
| Leptin [mg mL−1] | 1.3 | 0.2 | 1.4 | 0.1 | 0.496 |
| Adiponectin [mg mL−1] | 1.1 | 0.3 | 0.7 | 0.1 | 0.228 |
| Serotonin [µg mL−1] | 12.0 | 1.7 | 12.0 | 1.1 | 0.972 |
a)At necropsy (refed); b)Students’ t‐test (n = 10 to 12).
3.2. Systemic Glucose Tolerance
An OGTT was performed to assess insulin‐stimulated glucose clearance. The blood glucose levels and glucose iAUC did not differ between the No‐NR and the Ctrl‐NR animals during the OGTT (Figure 2A,B). The No‐NR animals required higher levels of insulin, with a significantly elevated peak insulin level (t = 15 min) and a tendency toward a larger iAUC (p = 0.083; Figure 2C,D). These animals also exhibited significantly higher fasting circulating insulin levels (Figure 2E). HOMA‐IR, an indicator of insulin resistance, was higher in No‐NR (Figure 2F). These data implicate that mice on No‐NR were less insulin sensitive.
Figure 2.

A) Oral glucose tolerance test. Blood glucose levels at the indicated time‐points before and after an oral glucose administration in week 17. B) iAUC. Plasma insulin at indicated time‐points during C) OGTT and D) plasma insulin iAUC (baseline is mean of t = 0 insulin in Ctrl‐NR). E) Plasma insulin at t = 0. F) HOMA‐IR. Ctrl‐NR: open square with solid line or white bar. No‐NR: closed circle with black dashed line or black bar. Data as mean ± SEM, n = 11 to 12. Analysis with two‐way ANOVA for (A), (C) or Students’ t‐test for (B), (D)–(F). *p < 0.05.
3.3. eWAT Transcriptome Enrichment Analysis
WAT plays an important role in the regulation of metabolic flexibility and systemic insulin sensitivity.26, 27 Therefore, we focused on the molecular responses of WAT and performed a whole‐genome transcriptome analysis of eWAT. The most affected pathways and GO‐processes were bioinformatically established. In the top 10 pathways, developmental processes and white adipocyte differentiation stand out (Figure 3A). Eight of the top 10 GO processes were related to cellular localization (G5, G7, G8, G9) and intracellular transportation, including endosomal and cytoplasmic transport and regulation of Golgi (G1, G2, G3, G4) (Figure 3B). While the pathways and GO processes seemed to differ, the underlying genes were not. The pathways were represented by a set of ten differentially expressed genes, with three genes appearing in all pathways: Mapk1 (also known as Erk2), Map2k1 (also known as Mek1), and Map2k2 (also known as Mek2) (Figure 3C). Mapk1 also appeared in all top 10 GO processes, while Map2k1 and Map2k2 were present in nine out of ten GO processes (Figure 3C). Dnm2, Rdx, and Arghf1 were present in several pathway maps, while Jak3, Ftna, Raptor, and Stim1 appeared in one pathway map. Dmn2, Rdx, Jak3, Fnta, and Raptor also appeared in the top 10 GO processes. Of these genes, Mapk1, Map2k1, and Fnta were upregulated, while the remainder were downregulated. Since pathway analysis suggested WAT differentiation, we examined eWAT morphological parameters (Figure S2, Supporting Information). In line with similar adiposity and eWAT weight (Figure S3A,B, Supporting Information), no significant differences were found in mean adipocyte size and its frequency distribution (Figure S3C–F, Supporting Information). In agreement with the data‐analysis output that did not indicate inflammation, no differences in the number of crown‐like structures (CLSs) or single macrophages were observed (Figure S3G,H, Supporting Information). The transcriptional expression of the genes related to adipogenesis and anti‐oxidant response in eWAT were not significantly changed, in accordance with the lack of evident morphological changes (Table S5, Supporting Information).
Figure 3.

Transcriptome analysis of eWAT. A) The top 10 pathway maps. B) The top 10 GO processes. C) Significant genes in the top 10 pathway maps, their expression as heat map (n = 12), FDR, fold change (No‐NR over Ctrl‐NR), and number of times appearing in a top 10 pathway maps and GO processes. The expression is presented as absolute expression in a sample minus the mean of the respective gene.
3.4. eWAT Insulin Signaling
To obtain a more detailed insight in eWAT gene regulation in response to No‐NR, the top 30 (fold change, FC) down‐ and upregulated genes, FDR < 0.2 genes, were further studied (Table 2; Table S3, Supporting Information). Among the 60 genes, several are directly related to insulin signaling, including the lower expressed genes Anp32a, Esr1, Ehd2, Tnk2 (also known as Ack1), Pbrm1, Jak3, and Hk1 and the higher expressed genes Map2k1, Meg3, and Mapk1 (Figure 4A and in bold in Table 2). Functional interpretation based on their direction of expression is consistently linked to a decreased activity of AKT,28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 implicating a downregulation of insulin signaling (Figure 4A). For technical validation, Anp32a, Ehd2, Tnk2, Map2k1, and Mapk1 plus Glut4 were selected and examined using qRT‐PCR. All these genes, except Ehd2, were significantly or tended to be regulated, confirming the microarray data (Figure 4B). The gene expression of Mapk1 and Map2k1 was considerably higher in No‐NR. The expression of Tnk2 and Anp32a was more than twofold lower in No‐NR. Expression of selected insulin signaling related genes that were affected in eWAT, was also examined in the liver and skeletal muscle, two other key organs controlling insulin sensitivity. However, no significant differences were observed in the gene expression of Map2k1, Mapk1, or Glut2 in the liver nor of Map2k1, Mapk1, or Glut4 in skeletal muscle (Figure S4, Supporting Information).
Table 2.
Top 30 down‐ and upregulated unique genes (FDR < 0.2, No‐NR over Ctrl‐NR)
| Gene symbol | Fold change | Gene symbol | Fold change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Anp32a | –1.95 | Mthfsl | 1.70 |
| Isoc2a | −1.86 | Rnu3b1 | 1.66 |
| Fmr1nb | −1.76 | Gm10115 | 1.64 |
| DefB36 | −1.72 | Map2k1 | 1.57 |
| Pakap | −1.59 | 5330406M23Rik | 1.54 |
| Ino80d | −1.52 | Tmem123 | 1.52 |
| Esr1 | −1.47 | Dcc | 1.47 |
| Cmtm4 | −1.46 | Gmpr2 | 1.46 |
| Cd151 | −1.45 | Mthfs | 1.45 |
| Nr3c1 | −1.45 | Qdpr | 1.42 |
| Dtx1 | −1.44 | Gcm1 | 1.42 |
| Rnd1 | −1.44 | Rhox8 | 1.42 |
| Chtf8 | −1.43 | LOC553096 | 1.41 |
| Akap11 | −1.41 | Ermn | 1.41 |
| 4833439L19Rik | −1.38 | Sumo2 | 1.40 |
| Kdsr | −1.36 | Pnma2 | 1.40 |
| Ehd2 | −1.35 | Gm33195 | 1.40 |
| Tnk2 | −1.35 | Dynlt3 | 1.40 |
| Arl4d | −1.34 | Trpm1 | 1.39 |
| Abca2 | −1.34 | B020031M17Rik | 1.39 |
| Pbrm1 | −1.34 | GaB3 | 1.39 |
| Rita1 | −1.34 | Eif2a | 1.39 |
| Arl6ip5 | −1.33 | Meg3 | 1.38 |
| Chpf2 | −1.33 | 1700097N02Rik | 1.38 |
| Rdx | −1.32 | Mapk1 | 1.38 |
| Mta1 | −1.32 | 4932431P20Rik | 1.38 |
| Cxx1a | −1.32 | Slfn9 | 1.38 |
| Cldnd1 | −1.32 | 5033418A18Rik | 1.37 |
| Jak3 | −1.32 | D030002E05Rik | 1.37 |
| Hk1 | −1.32 | Zdhhc6 | 1.36 |
Gene in bold are discussed. Gene annotation, systematic names, and gene function are in Table S3, Supporting Information.
Figure 4.

Insulin sensitivity. A) The net effect on insulin sensitivity of eWAT genes related to insulin signaling (from top regulated genes, Table 2). B) Validation of selected insulin signaling related genes using qRT‐PCR. Gene expression as No‐NR over Ctrl‐NR (n = 11 to 12). Ctrl‐NR: white bar, No‐NR: black bar. Data as mean ± SEM. Analysis with Students’ t‐test. **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.005, ****p < 0.001. C) Representative pictures for expression of GLUT4: Ctrl‐NR left (10× magnification), right (63×); No‐NR left (10× magnification), right (63×). n = 6. Scale bar 50 µm.
GLUT4 plays a key role in the downstream regulation of insulin signaling in WAT.38 Since Glut4 gene expression tended to be lower in No‐NR (p = 0.07), we analyzed GLUT4 protein expression. Using fluorescence microscopy, we observed GLUT4 expression on the adipocytes. The intensity of the GLUT4 staining was markedly reduced in No‐NR (Figure 4C), suggesting lower GLUT4 protein levels.
3.5. eWAT Mitochondria
Three mitochondrial genes Mthfs (FC 1.7), Mthfsl (FC 1.45), and Qdpr (FC 1.42) are among the most upregulated genes (Table 2). This was not due to a general upregulation of mitochondrial genes. Examining the 1661 mitochondrial probes in our dataset, derived from mouse MitoCarta 2.0, we found that 74.5% of the probes with FDR <0.5 were downregulated (5.0% for all expressed probes with FDR <0.5). This predominant downregulation was slightly more overt for FDR <0.2 (78,3%, while this was 4.9% for all expressed probes) (Figure 5A). The level of OXPHOS complex IV protein was decreased in No‐NR, and the levels of proteins representing complex II, III, and V tended to be lower (Figure 5B), confirming the mitochondrial gene expression data.
Figure 5.

Mitochondrial gene analysis and OXPHOS protein expression. A) Distribution of down‐ and upregulated (No‐NR over Ctrl‐NR) eWAT mitochondrial genes (n = 12) according to Mouse MitoCarta 2.0, up/down distribution in FDR < 0.5 set and FDR < 0.2 set. Upregulation; white bar, Downregulation: grey bar. B) OXPHOS Complex II‐V proteins, total protein loading control and quantified Complex II‐V intensity. Ctrl‐NR: white bar, No‐NR: black bar. Analysis with Students’ t‐test analysis (mean ± SEM; n = 7).
An enrichment analysis of the FDR < 0.5 mitochondrial genes showed that the ubiquinone metabolism pathway was most affected (Figure 6A). Without exception, this pathway consisted of genes encoding for NADH:ubiquinone oxidoreductase subunits that compose mitochondrial OXPHOS Complex I, with the majority of these genes being downregulated (22/24, 91.7%; Figure 6B). Among the limited number of upregulated mitochondrial genes (FDR < 0.5) were four key fatty acid oxidation genes Acsf2, Cpt1a, Etfa, and Slc25a20 (Figure 6C). This might indicate an increased fatty acid oxidation, supported by the lower RER of the No‐NR group at all time‐points over a 24 h period (Figure S1A, Supporting Information).
Figure 6.

Enrichment analysis of mitochondrial genes. A) Pathway maps analysis of FDR < 0.5 mitochondrial genes. B) Distribution of up‐/downregulated genes in the top 10 pathway ubiquinone metabolism. C) Fatty acid oxidation genes. n = 12. Upregulation: white bar, Downregulation: grey bar. Gene names and systemic names are in Table S4, Supporting Information.
3.6. Implications in Tetrahydrobiopterin Synthesis in eWAT
The upregulation of the mitochondrial genes Qdpr, Mthfs, and Mthfsl was fully confirmed by qRT‐PCR (Figure 7A). Since the function of QDPR is uniquely in salvaging of tetrahydrobiopteridin (BH4),39 and Mthfs and Mthfsl are implicated in the de novo BH4 synthesis, the more extensive FDR < 0.5 gene list was examined for additional genes directly related to these processes. One gene associated with BH4 salvage, Mthfd1, and two genes related to the de novo BH4 synthesis, Sumo2 and Gchfr, were identified (Figure 7B). The direction of expression of these six genes is consistent with the upregulation of BH4 synthesis39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44 (Figure 7B).
Figure 7.

Tetrahydropteridin (BH4) biosynthesis. A) Validation of expression of selected genes in eWAT using qRT‐PCR. B) Relevant genes were assigned according to their net effect on BH4 synthesis. Gene expression as fold change of No‐NR over Ctrl‐NR. Ctrl‐NR: white bar. No‐NR: black bar. Data as mean ± SEM. Analysis with Students’ t‐test. **p < 0.01, ****p < 0.001. n = 11 to 12.
3.7. Targeted NAD+ Metabolites in eWAT and Liver
To assess NAD+ status, levels of selected NAD+ metabolites were quantified in the eWAT and the liver. Levels of NAD+, NADP+, ADPR, NMN, and Me4py (full names in Methods, Supporting Information) were not significantly altered in eWAT (Figure 8A–E). In the liver, the level of NMN, a marker of vitamin B3 exposure, was significantly lower in the No‐NR group, whereas the levels of NAD+, NADP+, ADPR, NAAD, and Me4py remained unchanged (Figure 8F–H).
Figure 8.

NAD metabolome analysis. A–E) The levels of NAD+, NADP+, ADPR, NMN, and Me4py in the eWAT. F–K) The levels of NAD+, NADP+, ADPR, NMN, NAAD, and Me4py in the liver. Ctrl‐NR: white bar. No‐NR: black bar. Data as mean ± SEM. Analysis with Students’ t‐test. *p < 0.05. n = 3 to 7.
4. Discussion
Here, we observed a decreased insulin sensitivity in mice fed a vitamin B3 withdrawal diet. Since WAT was shown to be sensitive to vitamin B3 status,19, 45 we identified the molecular responses to vitamin B3 withdrawal in eWAT. The transcriptome data indicated a differential regulation of a set of genes involved in insulin signaling and lowering of markers of glucose utilization. Furthermore, biosynthesis of BH4, an essential cofactor for neurotransmitter synthesis, was found to be transcriptionally activated. A set of significant and strongly regulated genes related to these processes were technically validated and could serve as a WAT transcriptional signature marker for mild vitamin B3 deficiency. This signature is composed of downregulation of Anp32a,Tnk2 and the upregulation of Mapk1, Map2k1, Qdpr, Mthfs, and Mthfsl.
To impose a vitamin B3 insufficiency stress, we provided male C57BL/6JRccHsd mice with a diet without vitamin B3 and a low, but sufficient, amount of Trp to limit the rate of de novo NAD+ synthesis. The latter is essential to be able to observe effects of vitamin B3 withdrawal.12, 13 Due to cellular use of NAD+, which has a high turnover rate,3 and urinary secretion of NAD+ breakdown metabolites, this diet should gradually lead to vitamin B3 insufficiency. After the 18 week intervention, no differences were seen between the No‐NR group and the Ctrl‐NR group in body weight, lean mass, fat mass, EE, WAT weight, adipocyte size, WAT inflammation, or a range of circulating markers, including circulating serotonin levels. This could suggest the absence of a functional effect of vitamin B3 withdrawal. However, both the lower level of NMN in the liver, as well as potential NAD+ sparing molecular adaptations (see below), suggest functionality of the intervention. Maintenance of tissue NAD+ levels may be supported by de novo NAD+ synthesis from dietary Trp, which, at 0.115%, is just above minimal requirements.10 Indeed, the level of NAAD, an intermediate of the de novo NAD+ biosynthesis pathway, was not changed. By applying whole‐genome transcriptome analysis, qRT‐PCR and physiological analyses to eWAT, we were able to establish differential regulation of insulin signaling. A lowering in markers of glucose utilization and an increase in markers of fatty acid catabolism, implicate a shift from glucose to lipids for energy supply, which may be related to the reduced expression of the mitochondrial electron transport complexes. Finally, we observed transcriptional activation of the synthesis pathway of BH4, an essential cofactor for neurotransmitter synthesis.
The mild vitamin B3 deficiency resulted in a decreased insulin sensitivity. The underlying mechanisms were molecularly traceable in WAT. The top 10 GO processes center on the regulation of intracellular transport and localization (Figure 3B), which play an important role in insulin signal transduction and especially in downstream glucose transporter trafficking.46 The downregulation of most of the genes involved in these GO processes potentially implicate a downregulation of insulin signaling in the No‐NR group (Figure 3C). This is supported by decrease in the activation state of AKT, a key node in growth factor/insulin mediated glucose uptake47 (Figure 4A). GLUT4, the major glucose transporter in adipocytes, was lower expressed in No‐NR (Figure 4C). GLUT4 is responsible for insulin‐stimulated glucose uptake, and lower expression of GLUT4 is associated with local as well as systemic insulin sensitivity.48 The transcriptional activation of MEK/ERK may be implicated in a downregulation of insulin signaling as well. MEK/ERK activation was shown to decrease insulin‐stimulated glucose uptake, concomitant with the downregulation of Glut4 and the reduced glucose oxidation in adipocytes.49, 50
The upregulation of Map2k1 (Mek1) and Mapk1 (Erk2) indicate MEK/ERK activation. In agreement, Eif2a and Gcm1, targets of activated MEK/ERK,35, 51 were also upregulated (Table 2). Map2k2 (Mek2) was transcriptionally decreased, which might be due to the feedback regulation of an activated MEK/ERK pathway.52 We also technically validated the twofold downregulation of Anp32a (Pp32), which is the most responsive gene in the dataset. Its downregulation is in line with MEK/ERK activation, since silencing of Anp32a has been shown to induce MEK/ERK activation.53 Of note, all of the top 10 pathway maps and 9 of the top 10 GO processes contain Mapk1 and Map2k1, validating these genes as the core of the transcriptional signature of vitamin B3 deficiency in eWAT.
Concomitant with decreased levels of GLUT4, the gene expression of hexokinase 1 (HK1), that controls the initial rate‐limiting step of glycolysis, is downregulated, indicating that glucose utilization is inhibited in WAT of the No‐NR animals. Meanwhile, key mitochondrial FAO genes were upregulated (Figure 6C), contrasting with the downregulation of glycolysis and overall downregulation of mitochondrial genes (Figure 5A). This suggests a shift from CHO to FAO in the No‐NR animals, supported by a reduced ability to switch from FAO to CHO (from a fasted RER of 0.7 to a refed RER approaching 1.0; Figure 1E), and the 24 h RER being lower at all time‐points in No‐NR (Figure S1A, Supporting Information), confirming previously published data.19 This may be explained by the lower requirement for NAD+ of FAO, compared to aerobic CHO, to produce the same amount of ATP. Supporting this explanation, the RER was distinctly decreased upon the transition to a high fat diet in WAT‐specific Nampt knockout mice displaying WAT NAD+ deficiency,14 suggesting a clear preference of FAO compared to control. In WAT of No‐NR animals, we also observed a preferred downregulation of the mitochondrial Complex I genes (Figure 6B) and reduced expression of OXPHOS Complex IV (Figure 5B), coinciding with the putatively inhibited glucose utilization. OXPHOS Complex I accepts electrons from NADH, possibly implicating that the downregulation serves to liberate NAD+ for other cellular functions. Indeed, NAD+ level was not changed by vitamin B3 withdrawal (Figure 8A) and NAD+ biosynthesis or other consumer genes were absent from FDR < 0.2 gene set (data not shown). The lower levels of GLUT4, of Hk1 expression and of mitochondrial Complex I gene expression, and the increased FAO genes molecularly support a bioenergetic shift to liberate NAD+ for other processes, providing a possible mechanistic explanation for the reduced metabolic flexibility of the mice on the vitamin B3 withdrawal diet.
An intriguing finding of this study was the upregulation of Qdpr, Mthfs, and Mthfsl (Figure 7A), which sharply contrasts with the downregulation that was observed for the majority of mitochondrial genes (Figure 5A). Mthfs and Qdpr have an established role in pteridine metabolism. Mthfs encodes 5‐formyltetrahydrofolate cyclo‐ligase (MTHFS) that irreversibly catalyses the conversion of 5‐formyltetrahydrofolate, also known as folinic acid, to 5,10‐methenyltetrahydrofolate.40 Qdpr encodes quinoid dihydropteridine reductase (QDPR) with a unique function in the salvage synthesis of BH4 from dihydrobiopterin (BH2).39 The concurrent elevation of Mthfs and Qdpr, and possibly also structurally related Mthfsl, may indicate an enhanced interconnection between folate metabolism and BH4 salvage synthesis. In the brain, MTHFS, QDPR, and MTHFD1 have been proposed to cooperate in support of the BH4 pool as a favorable pathway to bypass the “methyl trap.”41 Of note, this pathway requires NADH as an essential cofactor, resulting in a release of NAD+. Downregulated Gchfr 42, 43 and upregulated Mthfs 44 and Sumo2 40 support an increased de novo BH4 biosynthesis (Figure 7B). It has been shown that the stimulation of this pathway by folinic acid or folic acid is effective as treatment of genetic defects of QDPR, that display abnormal low BH4 levels.39, 41 The observed gene expression changes are in line with a published metabolomics analysis of in vitro NAMPT silencing that showed an enhanced folate metabolism and de novo purine synthesis,54 that may potentiate BH4 biosynthesis.
Neural signals have an important role in the regulation of the WAT metabolic function.55, 56 In the current study, the No‐NR mice displayed an upregulation of Dcc, Gcm1, Ermn, Pnma2, and Tmem123 (Table 2), genes with a proven role in neuronal cell survival and maturation,57, 58, 59, 60, 61 possibly indicating an effect on WAT innervation. BH4 serves as an essential cofactor for tryptophan hydroxylase (TPH), phenylalanine hydroxylase, tyrosine hydroxylase as well as nitric oxide synthases. BH4 thus plays a vital role in the generation of neurotransmitters, such as serotonin, dopamine, and nitric oxide. It is tempting to speculate that the upregulation of BH4 synthesis serves to support the neuronal regulation of WAT metabolic function. To fully establish why increased BH4 synthesis occurs following vitamin B3 withdrawal and how this affects WAT metabolism awaits more detailed dedicated experimentation.
In conclusion, the current study showed an impaired insulin sensitivity in mice with mild vitamin B3 deficiency. Molecularly examined in WAT, the underlying metabolism is putatively associated with MEK/ERK activation and liberation of NAD+ from oxidative glucose metabolism to other NAD+ dependent cellular functions. Our data also implicate a possible increase in BH4 synthesis, which is an essential cofactor in neurotransmitter biosynthesis. We propose the expression of seven technically validated FDR < 0.2 genes related to these processes, the downregulation of Anp32a, Tnk2 and the upregulation of Mapk1, Map2k1, Qdpr, Mthfs, and Mthfsl, as a WAT transcriptional signature marker for mild vitamin B3 deficiency.
Conflict of Interest
Charles Brenner is inventor of intellectual property related to uses of nicotinamide riboside, which have been licensed by ChromaDex, Inc. He owns ChromaDex stock and serves as their chief scientific adviser. He is on the scientific advisory board of Cytokinetics, Inc. All other authors declare no conflict of interest.
Supporting information
Supporting information
Acknowledgements
The authors thank ChromaDex for the generous and kind supply of nicotinamide riboside. The authors thank their colleagues at Human and Animal Physiology and the animal facility for their help. The authors thank Ruth Van Heerbeek for practical contributions. Financial support by the Chinese Scholarship Council (grant #201303250054) is gratefully acknowledged. W.S., V.C.J.B., M.A.H., and J.K. were responsible for the study concept and design; W.S. conducted the animal experiment; W.S., A.D., I.S., and M.B.‐G. performed biochemical, molecular, and histological analyses; W.S. and E.M.S. performed bioinformatics; C.B. performed targeted NAD+ metabolomics. W.S. performed statistical analysis and wrote the draft manuscript. W.S., V.C.J.B., and J.K. interpreted the data and finalized the manuscript.
Shi W., Hegeman M. A., Doncheva A., van der Stelt I., Bekkenkamp‐Grovenstein M., van Schothorst E. M., Brenner C., de Boer V. C. J., Keijer J., Transcriptional Response of White Adipose Tissue to Withdrawal of Vitamin B3. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2019, 63, 1801100 10.1002/mnfr.201801100
References
- 1. Rajman L., Chwalek K., Sinclair D. A., Cell Metab. 2018, 27, 529. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Ying W., Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2008, 10, 179. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Liu L., Su X., Quinn W. J., 3rd, S. Hui , Krukenberg K., Frederick D. W., Redpath P., Zhan L., Chellappa K., White E., Migaud M., Mitchison T. J., Baur J. A., Rabinowitz J. D., Cell Metab. 2018, 27, 1067. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Wan P., Moat S., Anstey A., Br. J. Dermatol. 2011, 164, 1188. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Rawling J. M., Jackson T. M., Driscoll E. R., Kirkland J. B., J. Nutr. 1994, 124, 1597. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Rawling J. M., Jackson T. M., Roebuck B. D., Poirier G. G., Kirkland J. B., Nutr. Cancer 1995, 24, 111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Horwitt M. K., Harper A. E., Henderson L. M., Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1981, 34, 423. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Kirkland J. B., in Handbook of Vitamins (Eds: Zempleni J., Suttie J. W., Gregory J. F., III, Stover P. J.), CRC Press, Boca Raton: 2013, Ch. 5. [Google Scholar]
- 9. Bender D. A., Nutritional Biochemistry of the Vitamins, Cambridge University Press, London: 2003. [Google Scholar]
- 10. National Research Council , Nutrient Requirements of Laboratory Animals, 4th Rev. ed., National Academies Press, Washington DC: 1995. [Google Scholar]
- 11. Fox J. G., Barthold S., Davisson M., Newcomer C. E., Quimby F. W., Smith A., The Mouse in Biomedical Research: Diseases, Academic Press, Salt Lake City, UT: 2006. [Google Scholar]
- 12. Terakata M., Fukuwatari T., Kadota E., Sano M., Kanai M., Nakamura T., Funakoshi H., Shibata K., J. Nutr. 2013, 143, 1046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Terakata M., Fukuwatari T., Sano M., Nakao N., Sasaki R., Fukuoka S.‐I., Shibata K., J. Nutr. 2012, 142, 2148. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Nielsen K. N., Peics J., Ma T., Karavaeva I., Dall M., Chubanava S., Basse A. L., Dmytriyeva O., Treebak J. T., Gerhart‐Hines Z., Mol. Metab. 2018, 11, 178. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Frederick D. W., Loro E., Liu L., A. Davila, Jr. , Chellappa K., Silverman I. M., Quinn W. J., Gosai S. J., Tichy E. D., Davis J. G., Mourkioti F., Gregory B. D., Dellinger R. W., Redpath P., Migaud M. E., Nakamaru‐Ogiso E., Rabinowitz J. D., Khurana T. S., Baur J. A., Cell Metab. 2016, 24, 269. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Camacho‐Pereira J., Tarrago M. G., Chini C. C. S., Nin V., Escande C., Warner G. M., Puranik A. S., Schoon R. A., Reid J. M., Galina A., Chini E. N., Cell Metab. 2016, 23, 1127. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Yamamoto H., Uchigata Y., Okamoto H., Nature 1981, 294, 284. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Bieganowski P., Brenner C., Cell 2004, 117, 495. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Shi W., Hegeman M. A., van Dartel D. A. M., Tang J., Suarez M., Swarts H., van der Hee B., Arola L., Keijer J., Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2017, 61, 1600878. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Liu S., Kim T.‐H., Franklin D. A., Zhang Y., Cell Rep. 2017, 18, 1005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Lewis J. E., Shimizu Y., Shimizu N., FEBS Lett. 1982, 146, 37. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Ryu K. W., Nandu T., Kim J., Challa S., DeBerardinis R. J., Kraus W. L., Science 2018, 360, eaan5780. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Duivenvoorde L. P., van Schothorst E. M., Swarts H. M., Kuda O., Steenbergh E., Termeulen S., Kopecky J., Keijer J., PLoS One 2015, 10, e0128515. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Hoevenaars F. P., Bekkenkamp‐Grovenstein M., Janssen R. J., Heil S. G., Bunschoten A., Hoek‐van den Hil E. F., Snaas‐Alders S., Teerds K., van Schothorst E. M., Keijer J., Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2014, 58, 799. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. van Schothorst E. M., Pagmantidis V., de Boer V. C. J., Hesketh J., Keijer J., Anal. Biochem. 2007, 363, 315. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Storlien L., Oakes N., Kelley D., Proc. Nutr. Soc. 2004, 63, 363. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Sparks L. M., Ukropcova B., Smith J., Pasarica M., Hymel D., Xie H., Bray G. A., Miles J. M., Smith S. R., Diabetes Res. Clin. Pract. 2009, 83, 32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Yan W., Bai Z., Wang J., Li X., Chi B., Chen X., Oncol. Rep. 2017, 38, 1605. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Ribas V., Nguyen M. A., Henstridge D. C., Nguyen A.‐K., Beaven S. W., Watt M. J., Hevener A. L., Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metabol. 2009, 298, E304. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Park S. Y., Ha B. G., Choi G. H., Ryu J., Kim B., Jung C. Y., Lee W., Biochemistry 2004, 43, 7552. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Mahajan K., Coppola D., Challa S., Fang B., Chen Y. A., Zhu W., Lopez A. S., Koomen J., Engelman R. W., Rivera C., Muraoka‐Cook R. S., Cheng J. Q., Schonbrunn E., Sebti S. M., Earp H. S., Mahajan N. P., PLoS One 2010, 5, e9646. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Chowdhury B., Porter E. G., Stewart J. C., Ferreira C. R., Schipma M. J., Dykhuizen E. C., PLoS One 2016, 11, e0153718. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Wang H., Brown J., Gao S., Liang S., Jotwani R., Zhou H., Suttles J., Scott D. A., Lamont R. J., J. Immunol. 2013, 191, 1164. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Gottlob K., Majewski N., Kennedy S., Kandel E., Robey R. B., Hay N., Genes Dev. 2001, 15, 1406. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Shin S., Buel G. R., Wolgamott L., Plas D. R., Asara J. M., Blenis J., Yoon S. O., Mol. Cell 2015, 59, 382. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Zhu X., Wu Y. B., Zhou J., Kang D. M., Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2016, 469, 319. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Fujishiro M., Gotoh Y., Katagiri H., Sakoda H., Ogihara T., Anai M., Onishi Y., Ono H., Abe M., Shojima N., Fukushima Y., Kikuchi M., Oka Y., Asano T., Mol. Endocrinol. 2003, 17, 487. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Scherer P. E., Diabetes 2006, 55, 1537. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Ponzone A., Spada M., Ferraris S., Dianzani I., de Sanctis L., Med. Res. Rev. 2004, 24, 127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Field M. S., Anderson D. D., Stover P. J., Front Genet. 2011, 2, 36. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Kaufman S., Neurochem. Res. 1991, 16, 1031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Richardson M. A., Read L. L., T. Clelland C. L., Reilly M. A., Chao H. M., Guynn R. W., Suckow R. F., Clelland J. D., Neuropsychobiology 2005, 52, 190. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Xie L., Smith J. A., Gross S. S., J. Biol. Chem. 1998, 273, 21091. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Field M. S., Szebenyi D. M., Stover P. J., J. Biol. Chem. 2006, 281, 4215. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Yoshino J., Mills K. F., Yoon M. J., Imai S., Cell Metab. 2011, 14, 528. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Foster L. J., Li D., Randhawa V. K., Klip A., J. Biol. Chem. 2001, 276, 44212. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Taniguchi C. M., Emanuelli B., Kahn C. R., Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2006, 7, 85. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Carlson C. J., Koterski S., Sciotti R. J., Poccard G. B., Rondinone C. M., Diabetes 2003, 52, 634. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Brown J. M., Boysen M. S., Chung S., Fabiyi O., Morrison R. F., Mandrup S., McIntosh M. K., J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279, 26735. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Liu L., Zhou M., Lang H., Zhou Y., Mi M., J. Cell. Mol. Med. 2018, 22, 1247. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Nadeau V., Charron J., Development 2014, 141, 2825. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Hong S.‐K., Wu P.‐K., Karkhanis M., Park J.‐I., Cell. Signal. 2015, 27, 1939. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Fukukawa C., Tanuma N., Okada T., Kikuchi K., Shima H., Cancer Lett. 2005, 226, 155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Singh R. K., van Haandel L., Heruth D. P., Ye S. Q., Leeder J. S., Becker M. L., Funk R. S., J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2018, 365, 96. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Jiang H., Ding X., Cao Y., Wang H., Zeng W., Cell Metab. 2017, 26, 686. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Bartness T. J., Shrestha Y. B., Vaughan C. H., Schwartz G. J., Song C. K., Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 2010, 318, 34. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Shi M., Zheng M. H., Liu Z. R., Hu Z. L., Huang Y., Chen J. Y., Zhao G., Han H., Ding Y. Q., Dev. Biol. 2010, 348, 87. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Takekoshi T., Tada Y., Watanabe T., Sugaya M., Hoashi T., Komine M., Kawashima T., Shimizu T., Hau C. S., Asahina A., Yokomizo T., Sato S., Tamaki K., J. Biol. Chem. 2010, 285, 31876. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59. Altshuller Y., Copeland N. G., Gilbert D. J., Jenkins N. A., Frohman M. A., FEBS Lett. 1996, 393, 201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60. Brockschnieder D., Sabanay H., Riethmacher D., Peles E., J. Neurosci. 2006, 26, 757. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61. Stich O., Jarius S., Kleer B., Rasiah C., Voltz R., Rauer S., J. Neuroimmunol. 2007, 183, 220. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Supporting information
